Introduction. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture to restore range of motion and knee function. However, the effect of joint line elevation on the resulting TKA kinematics including frontal plane laxity is unclear. Thus, our goal was to quantify the effect of additional distal femoral resection on passive extension and mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with capsular and collateral ligament properties specific to TKA were developed and implanted with a contemporary posterior-stabilized TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was modeled by imposing capsular contracture as determined by simulating a common clinical exam of knee extension and accounting for the length and weight of each limb segment from which the models were derived (Figure 1). Distal femoral resections of 2 mm and 4 mm were simulated for each model. The knees were then extended by applying the measured knee moments to quantify the amount of knee extension. The output data were compared with a previous cadaveric study using a two-sample two-tailed t-test (p<0.05) [1]. Subsequently, varus and valgus torques of ±10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at the baseline, and after distal resections of 2 mm, and 4 mm. Coronal laxity, defined as the sum of varus and valgus angulation in response to the applied varus and valgus torques, was measured at 30° and 45°of flexion, and the flexion angle was identified where the increase in laxity was the greatest with respect to baseline. Results. With 2 mm and 4 mm of distal femoral resection, the knee extended an additional 4°±0.5° and 8°±0.75°, respectively (Figure 2). No significant difference was found between the extension angle predicted by the six models and the results of the cadaveric study after 2 mm (p= 0.71) and 4 mm (p= 0.47). At 2 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 3.1° and 2.7° at 30° and 45°of flexion, respectively. At 4 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° and 5.5° at 30° and 45° of flexion, respectively (Figures 3a and 3b). The flexion angle corresponding to the greatest increase in coronal laxity for 2 mm of distal resection occurred at 22±7° of flexion with a mean increase in laxity of 4.0° from baseline. For 4 mm distal resection, the greatest increase in coronal laxity occurred at 16±6° of flexion with a mean increase in laxity of 7.8° from baseline. Conclusion. A TKA computational model representing a knee with preoperative flexion contracture was developed and corroborated measures from a previous cadaveric study [1]. While additional distal femoral resection in primary TKA increases passive knee extension, the consequent joint line elevation induced up to 8° of additional coronal laxity in mid-flexion. This additional midflexion laxity could contribute to midflexion instability; a condition that may require TKA revision surgery. Further studies are warranted to understand the relationship between joint line elevation, midflexion laxity, and instability. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture. However, the effect of joint line proximalization on TKA kinematics is unclear. Thus, our goal was to quantify the effect of additional distal femoral resection on knee extension and mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with TKA-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a contemporary posterior-stabilized TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was modeled to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of +2 mm and +4 mm were simulated for each model. The knees were then extended under standardized torque to quantify additional knee extension achieved. Subsequently, varus and valgus torques of ±10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at the baseline, +2 mm, and +4 mm distal resections. Coronal laxity, defined as the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective torques, was measured at mid-flexion. Results. With +2 mm and +4 mm of distal femoral resection, the knee extended an additional 4°±0.5° and 8°±0.75°, respectively. At 30° and 45°of flexion, baseline laxity averaged 4.8° and 5.0°, respectively. At +2 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 3.1° and 2.7° at 30° and 45°of flexion, respectively. At +4 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° and 5.5° at 30° and 45° of flexion, respectively. Maximal increased coronal laxity for a +4 mm resection occurred at a mean 16° (range, 11–27°) of flexion with a mean increased laxity of 7.8° from baseline. Conclusion. While additional distal femoral resection in primary TKA increases knee extension, the consequent joint line elevation induces up to 8° of coronal laxity in mid-flexion in this computational model. As such, posterior capsular release prior to resecting additional distal femur to correct a flexion contracture should be considered

Aims. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture, which leads to femoral joint line elevation. There is a paucity of data describing the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion stability and knee kinematics. Thus, the goal of this study was to quantify the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with cadaver-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was created in each model to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of + 2 mm and + 4 mm were then simulated for each knee. The knee models were then extended under a standard moment. Subsequently, varus and valgus moments of 10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at baseline and repeated after each of the two distal resections. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective maximum moments) was measured throughout flexion. Results. With + 2 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by a mean of 3.1° (SD 0.18°) (p < 0.001) and 2.7° (SD 0.30°) (p < 0.001), respectively. With + 4 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° (SD 0.56°) (p < 0.001) and 5.5° (SD 0.72°) (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum increased coronal laxity for a + 4 mm resection occurred at a mean 15.7° (11° to 33°) of flexion with a mean increase of 7.8° (SD 0.2°) from baseline. Conclusion. With joint line elevation in primary PS TKA, coronal laxity peaks early (about 16°) with a maximum laxity of 8°. Surgeons should restore the joint line if possible; however, if joint line elevation is necessary, we recommend assessment of coronal laxity at 15° to 30° of knee flexion to assess for mid-flexion instability. Further in vivo studies are warranted to understand if this mid-flexion coronal laxity has negative clinical implications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):87–93

Total Knee Joint Replacement is mostly commonly performed using a measured resection technique. When the PCL is retained 9mm of bone is resected off the distal femur. If the PCL is excised 11m of bone is resected. Computer assisted total knee joint replacement will guide the surgeon to perform the optimal distal femoral resection to gain neutral alignment and full post operative extension. Three hundred TKJR’s were performed by one surgeon using the De Puy Ci navigation system. A ligament balancing technique is used whereby a neutral tibial resection is performed. A ligament tensor is inserted in extension and flexion. The navigation system then performs an optimization process whereby the distal femoral cut is calculated to give a neutral mechanical axis and 0° of knee extension. Data was collected measuring the distal femoral resection in the PCL retained and resected knees. The distal femoral cut required to achieve full extension for the PCL retaining TKJR ranged from 5 – 15mm. The mean was 11.2mm. The distal femoral cut required to achieve full extension for the PCL sacrificing TKJR ranged from 5 – 15mm. The mean was 10.8mm. There was no difference between the two groups (p=0.07). Both the PCL retaining and sacrificing TKJR distal resections correlated with the preoperative flexion deformity, i.e. patients with a greater fixed flexion deformity required a greater distal femoral resection to achieve full extension. There is a wide variation in the distal femoral cut to achieve full extension in TKJR. It is accepted that a smaller distal resection is required for a PCL retaining than a PCL sacrificing TKJR. Our study refutes this premise. A greater femoral resection is required if there is a greater fixed flexion deformity. A measured resection technique will result in a large percentage of patients with a fixed flexion deformity following TKJR

The routine use of a fixed distal femoral resection angle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) assumes little or no variation in the angle between the anatomical and mechanical femoral axes (FMA angle) in different patients. The aims of this study were threefold, firstly to investigate the distribution of FMA angle in TKA patients, secondly to identify any correlation between the FMA angle and the pre-operative coronal mechanical femoro-tibial (MFT) angle and in addition to assess post-operative MFT angle with fixed or variable distal femoral resection angles. 277 primary TKAs were performed using either fixed or variable distal femoral resection angles (174 and 103 TKAs respectively), with intramedullary femoral and extramedullary tibial jigs. The variable distal femoral resection angles were equal to the FMA angle measured on pre-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) digital radiographs for each patient. Outcomes were assessed by measuring the FMA angle and the pre- and post-operative MFT angles on HKA radiographs. The FMA angle ranged from 2° to 9° (mean 5.9°). Both cohorts showed a correlation between FMA and pre-operative MFT angles (fixed: r = -0.499, variable: r = -0.346) with valgus knees having lower FMA angles. Post-operative coronal alignment within ±5° increased from 86% in the fixed angle group to 96% when using a variable angle, p = 0.025. For post-operative limb alignment within ±3°, accuracy improved from 67% (fixed) to 85% (variable), p = 0.002. These results show that the use of a fixed distal femoral resection angle is a source of error regarding post-operative coronal limb malalignment. The correlation between the FMA angle and pre-operative varus-valgus alignment supports the rational of recommending the adjustment of the resection angle according to the pre-operative deformity (3°-5° for valgus, 6°-8° for varus) in cases where HKA radiographs are not available for pre-operative planning

Aims. Sagittal plane imbalance (SPI), or asymmetry between extension and flexion gaps, is an important issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare SPI between kinematic alignment (KA), mechanical alignment (MA), and functional alignment (FA) strategies. Methods. In 137 robotic-assisted TKAs, extension and flexion stressed gap laxities and bone resections were measured. The primary outcome was the proportion and magnitude of medial and lateral SPI (gap differential > 2.0 mm) for KA, MA, and FA. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of knees with severe (> 4.0 mm) SPI, and resection thicknesses for each technique, with KA as reference. Results. FA showed significantly lower rates of medial and lateral SPI (2.9% and 2.2%) compared to KA (45.3%; p < 0.001, and 25.5%; p < 0.001) and compared to MA (52.6%; p < 0.001 and 29.9%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in medial and lateral SPI between KA and MA (p = 0.228 and p = 0.417, respectively). FA showed significantly lower rates of severe medial and lateral SPI (0 and 0%) compared to KA (8.0%; p < 0.001 and 7.3%; p = 0.001) and compared to MA (10.2%; p < 0.001 and 4.4%; p = 0.013). There was no difference in severe medial and lateral SPI between KA and MA (p = 0.527 and p = 0.307, respectively). MA resulted in thinner resections than KA in medial extension (mean difference (MD) 1.4 mm, SD 1.9; p < 0.001), medial flexion (MD 1.5 mm, SD 1.8; p < 0.001), and lateral extension (MD 1.1 mm, SD 1.9; p < 0.001). FA resulted in thinner resections than KA in medial extension (MD 1.6 mm, SD 1.4; p < 0.001) and lateral extension (MD 2.0 mm, SD 1.6; p < 0.001), but in thicker medial flexion resections (MD 0.8 mm, SD 1.4; p < 0.001). Conclusion. Mechanical and kinematic alignment (measured resection techniques) result in high rates of SPI. Pre-resection angular and translational adjustments with functional alignment, with typically smaller distal than posterior femoral resection, address this issue. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):681–687

In Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) restoring the mechanical alignment of the knee joint is essential. This can be improved by considering the individual variability in the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur (FMA angle). However with the traditional instrumentation and the use of the most common fixed distal femoral resection angle of 6° we assume little or no variation in the FMA angles in different patients. In a previous study we showed that the FMA angle had a wide distribution and that there was a good correlation between the FMA angle and the pre-operative lower limb alignment in the coronal plane. Our hypothesis was that improved post operative limb alignment would be achieved with traditional instrumentation by individual measurement of the FMA angles pre-operatively and adjusting the distal femoral resections accordingly. In the study we compared the post-operative coronal limb alignment for a cohort of patients with a variable distal femoral resection angle to the previous cohort of fixed distal femoral resection angle. The study consisted of 103 patients undergoing 103 consecutive primary TKAs between October 2008 and March 2009. All patients had pre- and post-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle digital radiographs and had TKAs performed using a variable distal femoral cut angle. The FMA angle and the mechanical femoro-tibial (MFT) angles were measured in all cases. Inter-observer variation was measured by second observer readings. We compared our results with the group of 158 consecutive patients undergoing 174 primary TKAs operated between January and October 2007 using fixed distal femoral resection angle. Patient demographics of the two cohorts (age, gender, BMI) were similar. The pre-operative coronal deformity for the variable cohort was less than the fixed, mean 3.7° varus (SD 5.8°) compared to 4.7° varus (SD 7.9°). The FMA angles for the variable cohort ranged from 4° to 8°, (the fixed cohort from 2° to 9°). The variable valgus resection angles cohort showed a correlation between FMA and pre-operative MFT angles as had previously been shown in the fixed cohort (r = −0.499 and r = −0.346 respectively). Post op alignment showed that accuracy within ±5° increased from 86% (fixed resection angle group) to 96% (variable resection group). When using the more commonly quoted accuracy of within ±3°, this changed from 67% (fixed resection angle group) to 85% (variable resection group). These improvements were statistically significant (chi-squared 0.025 and 0.002, respectively). To further evaluate the effect of using variable angles we analysed the improvement of each of the different groups of deformity identified in the previous study (> 8° varus, 8° varus to 1° valgus, > 2° valgus). The range was reduced in both the extreme varus and valgus groups with the variable angles. The most significant improvement was found in the valgus group with the median reducing from 3° to 2° and range from 14° to 8°. It seems logical to use a variable distal femoral resection angle based on the patient’s individual anatomy. By doing so, our results show significant improvement of postoperative limb alignment compared to traditional method of using fixed distal femoral resection angle. In units where preoperative long leg film radiographs are available, measuring the FMA angle and setting the distal femoral resection angle guide accordingly improves the postoperative limb alignment. However, where long leg radiographs are not available, changing the distal femoral resection angle according to the pre-operative varus-valgus deformity is likely to improve the post operative limb alignment. (e.g. 4°–5° distal femoral resection angle for preoperative valgus, 6° for preoperative mild/moderate varus, and 7°–8° for preoperative severe varus).Computer navigation, however, enables us not only to use customised distal femoral cut for each patients, but it also provides many other useful information such as dynamical limb alignment through motion, component rotation, soft tissue balancing

Fixed flexion contracture is often present in association with osteoarthritis of the knee and correction is one of the key surgical goals in total knee replacement. Surgical strategies to correct flexion contracture include removal of posterior osteophytes, posterior capsular release and additional distal femoral bone resection. Traditional teaching indicates 2 mm of additional distal femoral bone resection will correct 10 degrees of flexion deformity. However some studies have questioned this figure and removing excessive distal femoral bone results in elevation of the joint line, potentially causing patella baja, alteration in collateral ligament tension through the flexion arc and mid-flexion instability. The aim of our study is to determine the relationship between distal bone resection of the femur and passive knee extension in total knee arthroplasty. A cohort of 50 patients, undergoing total knee arthroplasty, was recruited. Following complete femoral and tibial bone preparation, to simulate the effect of distal femoral bone resection, augments of 2 mm increments (2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm) were placed onto the trial femoral component. The degree of flexion contracture with each augment was measured using computer navigation. The results showed a 2 mm augment produced an average of 3.37 degrees of flexion deformity. A 4 mm augment led to an average of 6.68 degrees fixed flexion, whilst a 6 mm augment produced 11.38 degrees. To correct 10 degrees flexion deformity, an additional 6 mm distal femoral bone resection is required. In conclusion, additional distal femoral bone resection may not be as an effective strategy as previously believed to correct fixed flexion deformity in total knee arthroplasty

Proximal femoral resection (PFR) is a proven pain-relieving procedure for the management of patients with severe cerebral palsy and a painful displaced hip. Previous authors have recommended post-operative traction or immobilisation to prevent a recurrence of pain due to proximal migration of the femoral stump. We present a series of 79 PFRs in 63 patients, age 14.7 years (10 to 26; 35 male, 28 female), none of whom had post-operative traction or immobilisation. A total of 71 hips (89.6%) were reported to be pain free or to have mild pain following surgery. Four children underwent further resection for persistent pain; of these, three had successful resolution of pain and one had no benefit. A total of 16 hips (20.2%) showed radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification, all of which had formed within one year of surgery. Four patients had a wound infection, one of which needed debridement; all recovered fully. A total of 59 patients (94%) reported improvements in seating and hygiene. The results are as good as or better than the historical results of using traction or immobilisation. We recommend that following PFR, children can be managed without traction or immobilisation, and can be discharged earlier and with fewer complications. However, care should be taken with severely dystonic patients, in whom more extensive femoral resection should be considered in combination with management of the increased tone. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:701–6

A technical goal in total knee arthroplasty is the production of a neutral coronal plane mechanical axis. Errors may produce large mechanical axis deviations precipitating early implant failure. This study sought to test if measured distal femoral resection produced more accurate and consistent coronal alignment than arbitrarily set distal femoral resection. Data from a cohort of 255 consecutive unselected primary total knee arthroplasties undertaken by the senior author (PM) was collected prospectively and independently assessed. In the first 167 cases distal femoral resection was arbitrarily set to 5 degrees of valgus. In the remaining 88 cases the distal femoral resection angle was determined on a preoperative long leg standing AP radiograph. Postoperative coronal alignment was measured on long leg standing AP radiograph in all cases. The measured distal femoral valgus angle was between 4 and 7 degrees. An equal number measured either 5 or 6 degrees and accounted for 85% of the total number. Statistically insignificant improvements in mean axis and standard deviation were observed in the measured group: mean axis deviation −0.31 vs −0.51: p=0.17 (independent samples t test) and standard deviation 0.91 vs 1.09: p=0.055 (Levene test). Acceptable coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty can reliably be obtained with conventional instrumentation. Improvement in standard deviation with measured distal femoral valgus angle approaches statistical significance

INTRODUCTION. Although the most commonly used method of femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an intramedullary (IM) guides, this method demonstrated a limited degree of accuracy. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a portable, accelerometer-based surgical navigation system (Knee Align 2 system; Orth Align, Inc, Aliso Viejo, Calif) improve accuracy of the post-operative radiographic femoral component alignment compared to conventional IM alignment guide. MATERIALS & METHODS. Since February 2014, 44 consecutive patients (39 female, 5 male) with primary arthritis of the knee were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study. 24 patients underwent TKA (Vanguard RP or PS, Biomet Japan) using the navigation device for the distal femoral resection (Navigated Group), and 20 patients with conventional femoral IM alignment guide. The proximal tibial resection was performed using an extramedullary guide. All the operation was performed by a single senior surgeon (YK) with the same gap balancing technique except for the use of the navigation system for the femur. Accuracy of femoral implant positioning was evaluated on 2 weeks postoperative standing anteroposterior (AP) hip to ankle radiographs. RESUTS. In the navigated group, 100% of patients had an alignment within 90 ± 3° to the femoral mechanical axis in the coronal plane, versus 90.0% in the IM guides cohort (Fig). The mean absolute difference between the intraoperative goal and the postoperative alignment was 0.79 ± 1.0° in the Knee Align 2 cohort, and 1.72 ± 1.6° in the IM guides cohort (P < 0.05). There was a difference in the standard deviations observed for the navigated cases and the conventional cases when femoral component position was considered. There were no technique specific complications associated with the navigation system. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION. The distal femoral resection has been the main source of error as for the neutral mechanical axis because of the difficulty in visualization and detection of the center of the femoral head. The results in the current study have shown that a portable, accelerometer-based navigation device (Knee Align 2 system) significantly decreases outliers in femoral component alignment compared to conventional IM alignment guides in TKA

Chronic spastic hip dislocation in patients with spastic quadriplegia can lead to restricted range of movement and severe pain, inability to sit, respiratory and urinary infections, perineal hygiene problems and decubitus ulceration. The Castle procedure is designed to relieve pain and prevent these complications. This investigation evaluates whether the Castle procedure succeeds as a salvage procedure in a pediatric population. Patients with cerebral palsy who had undergone a proximal femoral resection according to Castle’s description were identified. Exclusion criteria included age over nineteen years at time of surgery, acute hip dislocation, and diagnoses other than cerebral palsy. Eight children completed a chart and radiographic review, and a clinical review. A staff physician evaluated range of motion, apparent discomfort of the child, and the state of the perineal skin. A questionnaire was given the primary caregiver assessing post-operative improvement in pain, sitting duration, infections, ulcers, ease of postoperative care, and overall satisfaction. Five males and three females with mean age at surgery of 13 ± 1 years, and an average follow-up of 42 ± 13 months were enrolled. All had proximal migration of the residual femur to at least the midpoint of the acetabulum. The average heterotopic ossification score post-op was Brooker one with no symptoms. Five of eight had mild discomfort, with two having moderate to severe discomfort. Five had reduced pain post-op such that they didn’t require analgesics, and were able to sit the entire day. One had a urinary infection post-op, and two had recurrent pneumonias and decubitus ulcerations postop. One child underwent a revision resection for pain and proximal migration, and one was rehospitalised for failure to thrive and pain control. Seven of eight caregivers were somewhat or very satisfied with the procedure, but only five of eight would recommend it to others. Problems identified by the caregivers included treatment failure, difficulty with post-operative care, and significant leg length discrepancy. The Castle procedure is a successful salvage in severe spastic hip disease, but not universally so. Education concerning potential outcomes and rehabilitation period is also essential in achieving satisfaction

Fifteen patients (11 males, 4 females) with a median age of 16 years (range, 7–25) were treated in our centre by intra-articular resection of the proximal femur, and hip arthrodesis using a vascularized fibular graft. Eight patients had Ewing’s sarcoma, 5 osteogenic sarcoma, and 2 chondrosarcoma. After a mean follow up of 58.2 months, 13 patients were alive with no evidence of disease. All fibular grafts united at a mean time of 7.6 months (range, 7–9 months). Four patients had stress fractures of the vascularized fibular graft, all healed after a mean period of 6.5 weeks. Failure of the fixation system occurred in two patients. Deep infection developed in one case which necessitated plate removal. Three of these patients with complications underwent a second procedure, giving a re-operation rate of 20%. The mean MSTS functional score was 85.9% at the time of the latest follow-up. We conclude that hip arthrodesis using a vascularized fibular graft is a viable alternative to endoprosthetic replacement after proximal femoral resections. It should be considered as an effective and durable reconstructive technique in young patients with high physical demands

Purpose: The functional consequences of femoral nerve resection during soft tissue sarcoma management are not well described. Sciatic nerve resection with a sarcoma, once considered an indication for amputation, is now commonly performed during limb salvage. We compared the functional outcomes of femoral and sciatic nerve resections in patients undergoing wide resection of soft-tissue sarcomas. Method: The prospectively collected database from a tertiary referral center for sarcomas was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with resection of the femoral or sciatic nerve performed during wide excision of a soft tissue sarcoma. Patient demographics, treatment, complications and functional outcomes were collected. Results: Ten patients with femoral nerve resections were identified, all women, aged 47 to 78, with large soft tissue sarcomas of varied subtypes. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, most pre-operatively. Six patients developed fractures with long-term follow-up, only two of which were in the prior radiation field. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 1987 scores demonstrated one excellent, 4 good, and 5 fair results. MSTS 1993 scores averaged 71.4 ± 17.2 percent and Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores (TESS) averaged 61.7 ± 21.8. There were no significant differences between the functional scores for patients with femoral or sciatic nerve resections (P=1.0). Conclusion: Femoral nerve resection appears more morbid than anticipated. The falls to which patients were prone, even years after surgery, subject them to ongoing long-term risks for fractures and other injuries. Nerve-specific functional outcomes should be considered when counseling patients prior possible resection of the femoral nerve for involvement by a soft tissue sarcoma

Our study includes 20 patients with femoral tumors during the years 1997–2002. The primary tumors were 5 sarcomas and 3 myelomas and we had 12 metastatic bone tumors. We used 12 modular prothesis and 8 long stem revision both for primary and for metastatic bone tumors. We applied special surgical techniques for the prevention of hip dislocation, the most common complication of proximal femoral resections. In our study we describe the various surgical techniques used, the modes of application of the endoprothesis and also the techniques of the soft tissue reconstruction, hi 17 cases we used bipolar hemiarthroplasty and in 3 cases, where acetabular metastasis was evident, we used special endoprothesis which allowed us to reconstruct the acetabulum with the use of a special plexus. The most frequently used approach was the anterolateral. In one case we used an anteromedial approach due to the femoral triangle invasion by the tumor. We put special emphasis in the techniques of the soft tissue reconstruction, like capsuloplasty, with the use of a Dacron plexus under a specific modification. This plexus was also used as an extension to cover the muscular defects created due to wide tumor resection. The follow up period ranged from 6 months up to 5 years. Out of the 20 cases we had only one dislocation. The functional results according to the Ennekin scale were: Excellent – Good: 65%, Fair: 30%, Poor: 5%. In conclusion, the new reconstruction techniques and the appropriate application of the modular prothesis that also preserve the femoral length, provide very good joint stability with good functional results

Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of limb alignment and component positioning after total knee arthroplasty(TKA) performed using fixed or individual distal femoral valgus correction angle(VCA)in valgus knees. Materials and Methods. One hundred and twenty-four patients were randomised to undergo TKA with either of the clinical baseline, radiological outcomes and subsequent outcome such as knee HSS scores, knee range of motion (ROM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed. Knees in the individual group (n=62) were performed with a tailored VCA. Knees in the fixed group (n=62) were performed utilizing a 4°VCA. Results. The distribution of distal femoral valgus cut angle used in the individual group range from 3° to 8°. There were statistically significant differences between groups in post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (individual: 180.0°±3.8°; fixed: 178.5°±2.9°; P=0.00). 86.9% of patients in the individual group had a post-operative mechanical axis deviation within ± 3°compared to 70.7% in the fixed group (P = 0.03). Patients in the fixed group had a higher percentage of postoperative residual deformity than in the individual group, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of femoral and component alignment except coronal femoral component angle (α), although the size of the difference was very small(individual: 90.12°±1.61°; fixed: 88.97°±2.50°), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.00). There were no differences in HSS scores, knee ROM, or VAS pain scores in the early phase after surgery between groups. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that the VCA in patients with knee valgus deformities are smaller than normal or varus knee. Individual VCA for distal femoral resection could enhance the accuracy of postoperative neutral limb alignment in the coronal plane. Both individual and fixed VCA place the components with the similar accuracy

Aims. One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions. Methods. In this single-centre, case-control study, 57 patients who underwent one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip and required resection of the proximal femur between 2009 and 2018 were identified. The control group consisted of 57 patients undergoing one-stage revision without bony resection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any correlation with resection and the risk factors for re-revisions. Rates of all-causes re-revision, reinfection, and instability were compared between groups. Results. Patients who required resection of the proximal femur were found to have a higher all-cause re-revision rate (29.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.018), largely due to reinfection (15.8% vs 0%; p = 0.003), and dislocation (8.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.762), and showed higher rate of in-hospital wound haematoma requiring aspiration or evacuation (p = 0.013), and wound revision (p = 0.008). The use of of dual mobility components/constrained liner in the resection group was higher than that of controls (94.7% vs 36.8%; p < 0.001). The presence and removal of additional metal hardware (odds ratio (OR) = 7.2), a sinus tract (OR 4), ten years’ time interval between primary implantation and index infection (OR 3.3), and previous hip revision (OR 1.4) increased the risk of proximal femoral resection. A sinus tract (OR 9.2) and postoperative dislocation (OR 281.4) were associated with increased risk of subsequent re-revisions. Conclusion. Proximal femoral resection during one-stage revision hip arthroplasty for PJI may be required to reduce the risk of of recurrent or further infection. Patients with additional metalware needing removal or transcortical sinus tracts and chronic osteomyelitis are particularly at higher risk of needing proximal femoral excision. However, radical resection is associated with higher surgical complications and increased re-revision rates. The use of constrained acetabular liners and dual mobility components maintained an acceptable dislocation rate. These results, including identified risk factors, may aid in preoperative planning, patient consultation and consent, and intraoperative decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1678–1685

Aims. Rotating-hinge knee prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct the distal femur after resection of a tumour, despite the projected long-term burden of reoperation due to complications. Few studies have examined the factors that influence their failure and none, to our knowledge, have used competing risk models to do so. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for failure of a rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 209 consecutive patients who, between 1991 and 2016, had undergone resection of the distal femur for tumour and reconstruction using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis. The study endpoint was failure of the prosthesis, defined as removal of the femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation; major revision (exchange of the femoral component, tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation); or amputation. Results. Multivariate Fine-Gray regression analyses revealed different hazards for each Henderson failure mode: percentage of femoral resection (p = 0.001) and extent of quadriceps muscle resection (p = 0.005) for overall prosthetic failure; extent of quadriceps muscle resection (p = 0.002) and fixation of femoral component (p = 0.011) for type 2 failure (aseptic loosening); age (p = 0.009) and percentage of femoral resection (p = 0.019) for type 3 failure (mechanical failure); and type of joint resection (p = 0.037) for type 4 (infection) were independent predictors. A bone stem ratio of > 2.5 reliably predicted aseptic loosening. Conclusion. We identified independent risk factors for overall and cause-specific prosthetic failure after rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using a competing risk Fine-Gray model. A bone stem ratio > 2.5 reliably predicts aseptic loosening. An accurate knowledge of the risks of distal femoral arthroplasty after resection for tumour assists surgical planning and managing patient expectations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1405–1413

Inverse Kinematic Alignment (iKA) and Gap Balancing (GB) aim to achieve a balanced TKA via component alignment. However, iKA aims to recreate the native joint line versus resecting the tibia perpendicular to the mechanical axis. This study aims to compare how two alignment methods impact 1) gap balance and laxity throughout flexion and 2) the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK). Two surgeons performed 75 robotic assisted iKA TKA's using a cruciate retaining implant. An anatomic tibial resection restored the native joint line. A digital joint tensioner measured laxity throughout flexion prior to femoral resection. Femoral component position was adjusted using predictive planning to optimize balance. After femoral resection, final joint laxity was collected. Planned GB (pGB) was simulated for all cases posthoc using a neutral tibial resection and adjusting femoral position to optimize balance. Differences in ML balance, laxity, and CPAK were compared between planned iKA (piKA) and pGB. ML balance and laxity were also compared between piKA and final (fiKA). piKA and pGB had similar ML balance and laxity, with mean differences <0.4mm. piKA more closely replicated native MPTA (Native=86.9±2.8°, piKA=87.8±1.8°, pGB=90±0°) and native LDFA (Native=87.5±2.7°, piKA=88.9±3°, pGB=90.8±3.5°). piKA planned for a more native CPAK distribution, with the most common types being II (22.7%), I (20%), III (18.7%), IV (18.7%) and V (18.7%). Most pGB knees were type V (28.4%), VII (37.8%), and III (16.2). fiKA and piKA had similar ML balance and laxity, however fiKA was more variable in midflexion and flexion (p<0.01). Although ML balance and laxity were similar between piKA and pGB, piKA better restored native joint line and CPAK type. The bulk of pGB knees were moved into types V, VII, and III due to the neutral tibial cut. Surgeons should be cognizant of how these differing alignment strategies affect knee phenotype

Aims. A significant percentage of patients remain dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential addition of accelerometer-based navigation for femoral component preparation and sensor-guided ligament balancing improved complication rates, radiological alignment, or patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with a historical control group using conventional instrumentation. Methods. This retrospective cohort study included 371 TKAs performed by a single surgeon sequentially. A historical control group, with the use of intramedullary guides for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided ligament balancing, was compared with a group using accelerometer-based navigation for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided balancing (group 1), and one using navigated femoral resection and sensor-guided balancing (group 2). Primary outcome measures were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) scores measured preoperatively and at six weeks and 12 months postoperatively. The position of the components and the mechanical axis of the limb were measured postoperatively. The postoperative range of motion (ROM), haematocrit change, and complications were also recorded. Results. There were 194 patients in the control group, 103 in group 1, and 74 in group 2. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the groups. Patients in group 2 had significantly higher baseline mental health subscores than control and group 1 patients (53.2 vs 50.2 vs 50.2, p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in any PROMs at six weeks or 12 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the rate of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), complication rates, postoperative ROM, or blood loss. There were fewer mechanical axis outliers in groups 1 and 2 (25.2%, 14.9% respectively) versus control (28.4%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). Conclusion. The sequential addition of navigation of the distal femoral cut and sensor-guided ligament balancing did not improve short-term PROMs, radiological outcomes, or complication rates compared with conventional techniques. The costs of these added technologies may not be justified. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):24–30