Introduction. Limb length discrepancy after THA can result in medicolegal litigation. It can create discomfort for the patient and potentially cause back pain or affect the longevity of the implant. Some patients tolerate the length inequality better compared to others despite difference in anatomical femoral length after surgery. Methods and materials. We analyzed the 3D EOS images of 75 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral THA (27 men, 48 women). We measured the 3D length of the femur and tibia (anatomical length), the 3D global anatomical length (the sum of femur and tibia anatomical lengths), the 3D functional length (center of the femoral head to center of the ankle), femoral neck-shaft angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, knee flexum/recurvatum angle, sacral slopes and pelvic incidence. We correlated these parameters with the patient perception of the leg length. Results. The values for leg length and pelvic parameters are shown in table 1. 37 patients had a perception of the LLD (49.3%). When the global anatomical length was shorter on the operated side, the perception of the discrepancy was observed in 56% of the cases. In case of anatomical length longer on the operated side, the perception of the discrepancy was described by the patients in 46% of the cases. The LLD perception was correlated with difference in functional length (p=0.0001), pelvic obliquity (p=0.003) and sacral slope (p=0.023). The anatomical femoral length was not correlated with the LLD perception (p=0,008). Discussion. The perception of LLD is a multifactorial complication. We found that the anatomical femoral length (that can be directly affected by the position of the stem) is not the only important factor. The functional length of the lower extremity which can also be affected by the knee deformities is better correlated with the LLD. The pelvic obliquity and version also affect the patient perception of the LLD

Purpose. Investigating the effects of femoral stem length on hip and knee muscle strength. Methods. The study included 20 patients having undergone total knee prostheses (TKP) due to coxarthrosis and 10 healthy subjects. Of the 20 patients, 10 underwent conventional TKP and 10 had Thrust Plate Prothesis (TPP). For the assessment of the patients’ muscle strength of operated and non-operated hips (Gl. medius and Gl. Maximus) and knees (Quadriceps Femoris-QF), the Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) was used. Results. A significant difference was observed in the muscle strength of Gl. medius in TPP patients and of Gl. maksimus in conventional TKP patients (p <0.05). Compared to the healthy group, only hip muscle strength decreased in TPP patients, but both hip and knee muscle strengths decreased in conventional TKP patients (p <0.05). Conclusion. A decrease in hip and knee muscle strengths was determined in the TPP and conventional THA patients, compared to healthy subjects. Compared to the bone protective prosthetic systems (eg TPP), a significant difference is observed in the QF muscle strength in intramedullary prosthesis applications. This data may be used in planning the treatment of patients with hip arthroplasty

Introduction. Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) often results in femoral head deformity and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Objective of this study was to analyse femoral morphology in LCPD patients at skeletal maturity to assess where the LLD originates, and evaluate the effect of contralateral epiphysiodesis for length equalisation on proximal and subtrochanteric femoral lengths. Materials and Methods. All patients treated for LCPD in our institution between January 2013 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with unilateral LCPD, LLD of ≥5mm and long leg standing radiographs at skeletal maturity were included. Total leg length, femoral and tibial length, articulotrochanteric distance (ATD) and subtrochanteric femoral length were compared between LCPD side and unaffected side. Furthermore, we compared leg length measurements between patients who did and who did not have a contralateral epiphysiodesis. Results. 79 patients were included, 21/79 underwent contralateral epiphysiodesis for leg length correction. In the complete cohort the average LLD was 1.8cm (95% CI 1.5 – 2.0), average ATD difference was 1.8cm (95% CI −2.1 – −1.9) and average subtrochanteric difference was −0.2cm (95% CI −0.4 – 0.1). In the epiphysiodesis group the average LLD before epiphysiodesis was 2.7 (1.3 – 3.4) cm and 1.3 (−0.5 – 3.8) cm at skeletal maturity. In the non-epiphysiodesis group the average LLD was 2.0 (0.5 – 5.1), p=0.016. The subtrochanteric region on the LCPD side was significantly longer at skeletal maturity in the epiphysiodesis group compared to the non-epiphysiodesis group: −1.0 (−2.4 – 0.6) versus 0.1 (−1.0 – 2.1), p<0.001. Conclusions. This study concludes that LLD after LCPD originates from the proximal segment only. In patients who had had a contralateral epiphysiodesis, the subtrochanteric femoral region was significantly longer on the LCPD side. These anatomical changes need to be considered by paediatric surgeons when advising leg length equalisation procedures, and by arthroplasty surgeons when LCPD patients present for hip arthroplasty

Introduction. Angular deformities of the distal femur can be corrected by opening, closing and neutral wedge techniques. Opening wedge (OW) and closing wedge (CW) are popular and well described in the literature. CW and OW techniques lead to leg length difference whereas the advantage of neutral wedge (NW) technique has several unique advantages. NW technique maintains limb length, wedge taken from the closing side is utilised on the opening side and since the angular correction is only half of the measured wedge on either side, translation of distal fragment is minimum. Leg lengths are not altered with this technique hence a useful technique in large deformities. We found no reports of clinical outcomes using NW technique. We present a technique of performing external fixator assisted NW correction of large valgus and varus deformities of distal femur and dual plating and discuss the results. Materials & Methods. We have treated 20 (22 limbs – 2 patients requiring staged bilateral corrections) patients for distal femoral varus and valgus deformities with CWDFO between 2019 and 2022. Out of these 4 patients (5 limbs) requiring large corrections of distal femoral angular deformities were treated with Neutral Wedge (NW) technique. 3 patients (four limbs) had distal femoral valgus deformity and one distal femoral varus deformity. Indication for NW technique is an angular deformity (varus or valgus of distal femur) requiring > 12 mm opening/closing wedge correction. We approached the closing side first and marked out the half of the calculated wedge with K – wires in a uniplanar fashion. Then an external fixator with two Schanz screws is applied on the opposite side, inserting the distal screw parallel to the articular surface and the proximal screw 6–7 cm proximal to the first pin and at right angles to the femoral shaft mechanical axis. Then the measured wedge is removed and carefully saved. External fixator is now used to close the wedge and over correct, creating an appropriate opening wedge on the opposite side. A Tomofix (Depuoy Synthes) plate is applied on the closing side with two screws proximal to osteotomy and two distally (to be completed later). Next the osteotomy on the opposite side is exposed, the graft is inserted. mLDFA is measured under image intensifier to confirm satisfactory correction. Closing wedge side fixation is then completed followed by fixation of opposite side with a Tomofix or a locking plate. Results. 3 patients (4 limbs) had genu valgum due to constitutional causes and one was a case of distal femoral varus from a fracture. Preoperative mLDFA ranged from 70–75° and in one case of varus deformity it was 103°. We achieved satisfactory correction of mLDFA in (85–90°) in 4 limbs and one measured 91°. Femoral length was not altered. JLCA was not affected post correction. Patients were allowed to weight bear for transfers for the first six weeks and full weight bearing was allowed at six weeks with crutches until healing of osteotomy. All osteotomies healed at 16–18 weeks (average 16.8 weeks). Patients regained full range of movement. We routinely recommend removal of metal work to facilitate future knee replacement if one is needed. Follow up ranged from 4 months to 2 yrs. Irritation from metal work was noted in 2 patients and resolved after removing the plates at 9 months post-surgery. Conclusions. NWDFO is a good option for large corrections. We describe a technique that facilitates accurate correction of deformity in these complex cases. Osteotomy heals predictably with uniplanar osteotomy and dual plate fixation. Metal work might cause irritation like other osteotomy and plating techniques in this location

Introduction. Limb-length discrepancy (LLD) is a common postoperative complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study focuses on the correlation between patients’ perception of LLD after THA and the anatomical and functional leg length, pelvic and knee alignments and foot height. Previous publications have explored this topic in patients without significant spinal pathology or previous spine or lower extremity surgery. The objective of this work is to verify if the results are the same in case of stiff or fused spine. Methods. 170 patients with stiff spine (less than 10° L1-S1 lordosis variation between standing and sitting) were evaluated minimum 1 year after unilateral primary THA implantation using EOS® images in standing position (46/170 had previous lumbar fusion). We excluded cases with previous lower limbs surgery or frontal and sagittal spinal imbalance. 3D measures were performed to evaluate femoral and tibial length, femoral offset, pelvic obliquity, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), knee flexion/hyperextension angle, tibial and femoral rotation. Axial pelvic rotation was measured as the angle between the line through the centers of the hips and the EOS x-ray beam source. The distance between middle of the tibial plafond and the ground was used to investigate the height of the foot. For data with normal distribution, paired Student's t-test and independent sample t-test were used for analysis. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the correlation between the perception of limb length discrepancy and different variables. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the correlation between the patient perception of LLD and variables found significant in the univariate analysis. Significance level was set at 0.05. Results. Anatomical femoral length correlated with patients’ perception of LLD but other variables were significant (the height of the foot, sagittal and frontal knee alignment, pelvic obliquity and pelvic rotation more than 10°). Interestingly some factors induced an unexpected perception of LLD despite a non-significant femoral length discrepancy less than 1cm (pelvic rotation and obliquity, height of the foot). Conclusions. LLD is a multifactorial problem. This study showed that the anatomical femoral length as the factor that can be modified with THA technique or choice of prosthesis is not the only important factor. A comprehensive clinical and radiological evaluation is necessary preoperatively to investigate spinal stiffness, pelvic obliquity and rotation, sagittal and coronal knee alignment and foot deformity in these patients. Our study has limitations as we do not have preoperative EOS measurements for all patients. We cannot assess changes in leg length as a result of THA. We also did not investigate the degree of any foot deformities as flat foot deformity may potentially affect the patients perception of the leg length. Instead, we measured the distance between the medial malleolus and ground that can reflect the foot arch height. More cases must be included to evaluate the potential influence of pelvis anatomy and functional orientation (pelvic incidence, sacral slope and pelvic tilt) but this study points out that spinal stiffness significantly decreases the LLD tolerance previously reported in patients without degenerative stiffness or fusion

Objectives. For patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) who progress to needing total joint arthroplasty it is important to understand the morphology of the femur when planning for and undertaking the surgery, as the surgery is often technically more challenging in patients with DDH on both the femoral and acetabular parts of the procedure. 1. The largest number of male DDH patients with degenerative joint disease previously assessed in a morphological study was 12. 2. In this computed tomography (CT) based morphological study we aimed to assess whether there were any differences in femoral morphology between male and female patients with developmental dysplasia undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a cohort of 49 male patients, matched to 49 female patients. Methods. This was a retrospective study of the pre-operative CT scans of all male patients with DDH who underwent THA at two hospitals in Japan between 2006–2017. Propensity score matching was used to match these patients with female patients in our database who had undergone THA during the same period, resulting in 49 male and 49 female patients being matched on age and Crowe classification. The femoral length, anteversion, neck-shaft angle, offset, canal-calcar ratio, canal flare index, lateral centre-edge angle, alpha angle and pelvic incidence were measured for each patient on their pre-operative CT scans. Results. Significant differences were found in femoral anteversion with a mean male anteversion of 22 ˚ (±14.2), compared to 30˚ (±15.5), in females (p=0.02, Confidence Interval (C.I.) 1.6 to 14.9, Figure 1), offset, with a mean male offset of 31 mm (±6.2), compared to 29 mm (±6.1) in females, (p=0.04, C.I: 0.2 to 4.8), and femoral length with a mean femoral length of 434 mm in males (±22.2), compared to 407 mm in females (±23.9), (p<0.001, C.I: 19.2 to 34.3, Figure 2). No significant differences between male and female patients were found for the other measurements. Discussion. This was the first study of this size assessing femoral morphology in male patients with DDH undergoing THA. Significant differences were found between male and female patients in femoral anteversion, length and offset. This should be taken into account when planning and performing THA in these patients. Based on the findings from this study, a more anteverted femoral neck can be expected at the time of surgery in a female patient with DDH undergoing total hip arthroplasty, compared to a male patient

Introduction. Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is one of the major reasons of dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty(THR) and limb equalization after THR in unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is very important. study designed to measure the difference of adult femoral length between normal and dislocated hip in unilateral DDH. Method. Sixty patients with unilateral high riding DDH (crow type 3,4) who were underwent THR included. All the cases had digital lower limb scanograms. Exclusion criteria was any previous hip or femur surgery, any rheumatoid disease, history of any disease that affect the growth. All the scanograms measured by one fellowship of adult reconstruction and one radiologist specialized in musculoskeletal imaging. Each one repeated the measurements two months later blindly and inter observer and intra observer reliability checked. Each one measured femoral length in both sides from greater trochanter(GT), to the distal surface of the femoral condyles. Results. 59 female and one males included. Average age was 27.5 years (19–50 years). Inter observer reliability index were excellent (ICC 98%). Only 6 cases (10%) had exactly equal femoral length, 31(52%) cases were longer on the dislocated side and 23 (38%) cases were shorter. Average overgrowth was 6.1 mm (Range: 1–22) and average undergrowth was 10.7 (Range 1–21). 35 cases (58.3%) cases had 5 mm or more differences and 30% had 5–10 mm .17 cases (28.3%) had at least 10 mm difference that 8 cases (13%) had shorter and 9 cases (15%) had longer femur on dislocated side. Maximum difference was 22 mm over length on dislocated side. Conclusions. More than half of patients with unilateral high riding DDH have longer femur on the dislocated side and 15% of them are longer than 10 mm. we recommend to get the scanograms in all the unilateral DDH cases to avoid post-operative limb discrepancy and detecting the amount of shortening in cases that need femoral shortening

Introduction. The success of knee replacement surgery depends, in part, on restoration of the correct alignment of the leg with respect to the load-bearing vector passing from the hip to the ankle (the mechanical axis). Conventional thinking is that the correct angle of resection of the distal femur (Valgus Cut Angle, VCA) depends on femoral length or femoral offset, though femoral bowing, in addition to length and medial offset, may also have a significant influence on the VCA. We hypothesized that femoral bowing has a strong effect on the VCA necessary to restore physiologic alignment after arthroplasty or osteotomy. Methods. A total of 102 long-leg radiographs were obtained from patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty. The patients on average were 41% male 59% female, 67.9 ± 11.1 years, 67.0 ± 4.7 in, 192 ± 43 lbs, and had a BMI of 29.7 ± 4.8. All radiographs were prepared with the feet placed in identical rotation and the patellae pointing forward, and were excluded if there was evidence of malrotation, as defined by (i) a difference in the medial head offsets of the right and left femur of >3mm, (ii) a difference in the width of the tibiofibular syndesmoses, or (iii) a difference in the rotation of one foot compared to the other. The following anatomic variables were measured on each radiograph: (i) the neck shaft angle (NSA) of the femur, (ii) the length of the femur, (iii) the length of the femoral shaft, (iv) the medial head offset, (v) the medial-lateral bow of the distal femur, (vi) the hip- knee axis angle, (vii) the mechanical axis deviation of the extremity at the knee, (viii) the medio-lateral bow of the tibia, and (ix) the valgus cut angle required to restore the mechanical axis to the center of the knee during surgery (VCA). Bivariate plots were constructed using the measurements thought to influence the VCA: femoral bowing, femoral offset, and length of femur. Multivariate regression was then used to find the variable that had the strongest effect on the VCA. Results. The bivariate plot of offset and VCA yielded an R2 of 0.02544 (p = 0.11) was not statistically significant. However, the bivariate plot of femoral length and VCA yielded an R2 of 0.1294 (p = 0.0002) showing significant correlation. Lastly, the bivariate plot of femoral bowing and VCA yielded an R2 of 0.59136 (p < 0.00001) demonstrating significant correlation (Figure 3). Multivariate analysis revealed that femoral bowing was the best predictor of VCA: VCA = 5.46–0.363 femoral bowing (°) + 0.106 Femoral offset (mm) − 0.010 femoral length (mm). Discussion. While clinicians performing knee replacements typically do not consider femoral bowing when selecting the valgus angle appropriate for each patient, our findings demonstrate that femoral bowing has a potent effect on VCA. The multivariate regression indicated that femoral bowing had the highest effect on VCA followed by offset and femoral length. These findings suggest that surgeons should consider measuring long alignment radiographs before performing a total knee arthroplasty

Introduction. The assessment of leg length is essential for planning the correction of deformities and for the compensation of length discrepancy, especially after hip or knee arthroplasty. CT scan measures the “anatomical” lengths but does not evaluate the “functional” length experienced by the patients in standing position. Functional length integrates frontal orientation, flexion or hyperextension. EOS system provides simultaneously AP and lateral measures in standing position and thus provides anatomical and functional evaluations of the lower limb lengths. The objective of this study was to measure 2D and 3D anatomical and functional lengths, to verify whether these measures are different and to evaluate the parameters significantly influencing these potential differences. Material and Methods. 70 patients without previous surgery of the lower limbs (140 lower extremities) were evaluated on EOS images obtained in bipodal standing position according to a previously described protocol. We used the following definitions:. anatomical femoral length between the center of the femoral head (A) and center of the trochlea (B). anatomical tibial length between the center tibial spine (intercondylar eminence) (C) and the center of the ankle joint (D). functional length is AD. global anatomical length is AB + CD. Other parameters measured are HKA, HKS, femoral and tibial mechanical angles (FMA, TMA), angles of flexion or hyperextension of the knee, femoral and tibial torsion, femoro-tibial torsion in the knee, and cumulative torsional index (CTI). All 2D et3D measures were evaluated and compared for their repeatability. Results. Regarding repeatability, an ICC> 0.95 was found for all measurements except for the tibial mechanical angle (0.91 for 2D, 3D 0.92 for 3D). We observed 54/140 lower limbs with Flessum/Recurvatum angles (FRA) >10°. 2D results (mean, SD) were. 41,8mm(2,9) for femoral anatomical length. 36,1mm(2,8) for tibial anatomical length. 78,0mm(5,4) for global anatomical length. 78,5 mm(5,5) for functional length. 7,4°(12,0) for Flessum/Recurvatum angle. −1,5°(6,4) for HKA. 4,9°(2,0) for HKS. 92,1°(3,4) for FMA. 87,1°(3,4) for TMA. 3D results (mean, SD) were. 42,4mm (2,8) for femoral anatomical length. 36,6mm (2,8) for tibial anatomical length. 79,0mm (5,4) for global anatomical length. 78,9mm (5,5) for functional length. 7,2°(12,0) for Flessum/Recurvatum angle. −1,0°(5,9) for HKA. 4,9°(1,5) for HKS. 92,7°(2,7) for FMA. 87,9°(3,9) for TMA. The 2D/3D measurements of functional lengths were statistically significant (p <0.0001. Student's test). For anatomical lengths. 2D/3D measurements were also statistically significant (p <0.0001. Student's test for femoral tibial and global anatomical lengths). Some parameters significantly influenced 2D/3D differences:. for the global anatomical length: FRA P<0,0001, TMA P=0,0173, HKA P=0,0259 and femoro-tibial torsion P=0,0026. for the functional length FRA P=0,0065. Discussion and conclusion. EOS imaging allows to accurately assess the anatomical and functional length experienced by the patient. These new data open new perspectives for planning length or axis corrections and for an optimized evaluation in some medico legal issues after joint replacement or posttraumatic sequelae. This study points out the importance of 3D measurements in outliers cases (varus or valgus cases, flessum or recurvatum of the knee)

Open femoral fractures are uncommon, and there are very few reports in the literature which refer specifically to their management. The results of the treatment of 31 open femoral fractures with significant bone loss in 29 patients treated in a single Orthopaedic Trauma Unit were reviewed. All fractures underwent wound and bony debridement before skeletal stabilisation at restored femoral length, using primary locked intramedullary nailing or dynamic condylar screw fixation for diaphyseal or metaphyseal fractures respectively. Soft tissue closure was performed at 48 hours in the majority of cases, followed by elective bone grafting procedures for 13 of the fractures. All fractures achieved bony union at an average of 51 weeks (range 20-156 weeks). The time to fracture union and subsequent functional outcome were largely dependent upon the location, type and extent of the bone loss. Union was achieved more rapidly in fractures associated with wedge defects than those with segmental bone loss, and fractures with metaphyseal defects healed more rapidly than those of comparable size in the diaphysis. Metaphyseal wedge fractures did not require any further procedures to achieve union. Complications were more common in the fractures with greater bone loss, which included knee stiffness, delay to union, malunion and leg length discrepancy. One patient had a deep infection, treated by debridement. We have produced an algorithm for the treatment of these injuries, based upon our findings. We feel that satisfactory results can be achieved in most femoral fractures with bone loss, using appropriate initial debridement and modern methods of primary skeletal fixation at a restored femoral length, followed by soft tissue coverage procedures and elective bone grafting, as required

Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as it is well known that alignment is important for the proper function of a total knee replacement. Malalignment of the prosthetic joint can lead to abnormal kinematics, unbalanced soft-tissues, and early loosening. Although there are no long term studies proving the clinical benefits of computer navigation in TKA, studies have shown that varus alignment of the tibial component is a risk factor for early loosening. A handheld, accelerometer based navigation unit for use in total knee replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in making the proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. Studies have shown the accuracy to be comparable to large, console-based navigation units. Additionally, accuracy of cuts is superior to the use of traditional alignment guides, improving the percentage of cuts within 2 degrees of the desired alignment. Because the registration is based on the mechanical axis of the knee, anatomic variables such as femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral length, and presence of a tibial bow do not affect the results. The handheld aspect of this navigation unit allows its use without additional incisions or array attachment. Furthermore, the learning curve and usage time is minimal, supporting its use in primary TKA

Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as it is well known that alignment is important for the proper function of a total knee replacement. Malalignment of the prosthetic joint can lead to abnormal kinematics, unbalanced soft-tissues, and early loosening. Although there are no long term studies proving the clinical benefits of computer navigation in TKA, studies have shown that varus alignment of the tibial component is a risk factor for early loosening. A handheld, accelerometer based navigation unit for use in total knee replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in making the proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. Studies have shown the accuracy to be comparable to large, console-based navigation units. Additionally, accuracy of cuts is superior to the use of traditional alignment guides, improving the percentage of cuts within 2 degrees of the desired alignment. Because the registration is based on the mechanical axis of the knee, anatomic variables such as femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral length, and presence of a tibial bow do not affect the results. The handheld aspect of this navigation unit allows its use without additional incisions or array attachment. Furthermore, the learning curve and usage time is minimal, supporting its use in primary TKA

Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as it is well known that alignment is important for the proper function of a total knee replacement. Malalignment of the prosthetic joint can lead to abnormal kinematics, unbalanced soft tissues, and early loosening. Although there are no long term studies proving the clinical benefits of computer navigation in TKA, studies have shown that varus alignment of the tibial component is a risk factor for early loosening. A handheld, accelerometer-based navigation unit for use in total knee replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in making the proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. Studies have shown the accuracy to be comparable to large, console-based navigation units. Additionally, accuracy of cuts is superior to the use of traditional alignment guides, improving the percentage of cuts within 2 degrees of the desired alignment. Because the registration is based on the mechanical axis of the knee, anatomic variables such as femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral length, and presence of a tibial bow do not affect the results. The handheld aspect of this navigation unit allows its use without additional incisions or array attachment. Furthermore, the learning curve and usage time is minimal, supporting its use in primary TKA

Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as it is well known that alignment can affect clinical results. Malalignment of the prosthetic joint can lead to abnormal kinematics, unbalanced soft-tissue, and early loosening. Although there are no long term studies proving the clinical benefits of computer navigation in TKA, studies have shown that varus alignment of the tibial component is a risk factor for early loosening. A handheld, accerelerometer based navigation unit for use in total knee replacement has recently become available to assist the proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. Studies have shown the accuracy to be comparable to large, console-based navigation units. Additionally, accuracy of cuts is superior to the use of traditional alignment guides, improving the percentage of cuts within 2 degrees of the desired alignment. Because the registration is based on the mechanical axis of the knee, anatomic variables such as femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral length, and presence of a tibial bow do not affect the results. The handheld aspect of this navigation unit allows its use without additional incisions or array attachment. Furthermore, the learning curve and usage time is minimal, supporting its use in primary TKA

Introduction. Natural population variation in femoral morphology results in a large range of offsets, anteversion angles and lengths. During total hip arthroplasty, accurate restoration of hip biomechanics is essential to achieve good functional results. One option is to restore the anatomic hip rotation center. Alternatively, medializing the rotation center and compensating by increasing the femoral offset, reduces acetabular contact forces and increases the abductor lever arm. We investigated the ability of two cemented stem systems to restore hip biomechanics in an anatomic and medialized way. We compared an undersized “Exeter-type” of stem with three offset options and 18 sizes (CPT, Zimmer), to a line-to-line “Kerboul-type” of stem with proportional offset and 12 sizes (Centris, Mathys). Methods. Thirty CT scans of whole femora were segmented and the hip rotation center, proximal femoral axis and femoral length were determined with Mimics and 3-matic (Materialise). Using scripting functionality in the software, CAD design files of both stems were automatically sized and aligned along the proximal femoral axis to restore an anatomical and a 5 mm medialized hip rotation center. Stem size and position could be fine-tuned manually. The maximum distances between the prosthetic (PRC), the anatomic (ARC) and the medialized hip rotation center (MRC) were calculated (Fig. 1). Variations in femoral offset (ΔFO), anteroposterior (ΔAP) and proximodistal distance (ΔPD) were analyzed. Finally, the number of cases where the hip rotation center could be restored within 5 mm was reported. Results. Both implants allowed restoring the ARC accurately (mean distance PRC-ARC: CPT 0.97±0.88 mm, Centris 1.66±1.59 mm; mean difference ΔFO: CPT 0.09±0.19 mm, Centris 0.11±0.29 mm; mean difference ΔAP: CPT 0.12±1.22°, Centris 0.27±1.78 mm, mean difference ΔPD: CPT 0.04±0.44 mm, Centris 0.49±1.35 mm). The CPT stem allowed restoring the PRC within 5 mm of the ARC in all cases (max. 4.31 mm), whereas the Centris stem achieved this in only 28/30 hips (max. 6.72 mm) (Fig. 2). Aiming for a MRC was less satisfactory with both stems (mean distance PRC-MRC: CPT 1.38±1.63 mm, Centris 3.61±2.73 mm; mean difference ΔFO: CPT 0.09±0.10 mm, Centris 0.06±0.35 mm; mean difference ΔAP: CPT 0.17±2.02 mm, Centris 2.58±2.68 mm, mean difference ΔDP; CPT 0.28±0.67 mm, Centris 1.98±1.66 mm). The CPT stem allowed restoring the PRC within 5 mm of the MRC in 29/30 cases (max. 8.09 mm), whereas the Centris stem achieved this in only 25/30 cases (max. 11.15 mm) (Fig. 3). Discussion. Although both stem systems allowed restoring hip biomechanics accurately in most cases, the CPT system was superior to the Centris stem for achieving both ARC and MRC. This could be explained by more implant sizes (18 vs. 12) and undersized stems offering more freedom to correct version. Although medializing the hip rotation center offers biomechanical advantages, both stems had more difficulties achieving this. In some cases, differences between aimed and planned rotation centers were close to 1 cm which might negatively impact on clinical outcome. As such, to avoid suboptimal reconstructions with the available implants, templating is mandatory especially when aiming at a medialized reconstruction strategy

Introduction. EOS® is a low dose imaging system which allows the acquisition of coupled AP and lateral high-definition images while the patient is in standing position. HipEos has been developped to perform pre-surgical planning including hip implants selection and virtual positioning in functional weight-bearing 3D. The software takes advantage of the real size 3D patient anatomical informations obtained from the EOS exam. The aim of this preliminary study on 30 consecutive THP patients was to analyze the data obtained from HipEos planning for acetabular and femoral parameters and to compare them with pre and post-operative measurements on standing EOS images. Material and methods. Full body images were used to detect spino-pelvic abnormalities (scoliosis, pelvic rotation) and lower limbs discrepancies. One surgeon performed all THP using the same type of cementless implants (anterior approach, lateral decubitus). The minimum delay for post-op EOS controls was 10 months. A simulation of HipEos planning was performed retrospectively in a blinded way by the same surgeon after the EOS controls. All measurements were realized by an independent observer. Comparisons were done between pre and post-op status and the “ideal planning” taking in account the parameters for the restitution of joint offset and femur and global limb lengths according to the size of the selected implants. Regarding cup anteversion, the data included the anatomical anteversion (with reference to the anterior pelvic plane APP) and functionnal anteversion (according to the horizontal transverse plane in standing position). Results. The difference between pre-op and post-op APP angles is not statistically significant (p = 0.85), likewise for the sacral slope (p = 0.3). Thus, there has been no change in the orientation of the pelvis after THP. Comparing the two hips on post-op EOS data shows that the difference in femoral offset is not statistically significant (p = 0.76). However, the femoral length is statistically different (p <0.05) (mean 4mm, 0–12mm). The difference for femoral offset between HipEOS planning and post-op EOS data is not statistically significant (p = 0.58). However, the mean difference is significant (p <0.05) for femur length (5mm), inclination (5°) and anteversion of the cup. The mean post-op anatomic anteversion measured in the APP is 27°, whereas it is 11° with HipEOS planning. The mean functional anteversion of the cup on standing post-op EOS data is 35° while planning it is 17°. Otherwise, differences in femoral anteversion are not significant. Conclusion. The planning tools currently available include only the local anatomy of the hip for THP adjustment. This software integrates weight-bearing position, which allows to consider the impact of spine deformities and length discrepancies. This preliminary study is only retrospective, but it highlights the potential interest this “global planning” particularly for the optimization of acetabular anteversion and length adjustment according to pelvic tilt. Planning using the standing lateral view is interesting not only for visualization of the sagittal curvature of the femur and the detection of potential difficulties, but also for the visual data provided on the sagittal orientation of the cup

The purpose of this study is to describe the use of intramedullary distraction coupled with an additional osteotomy to achieve union with simultaneous deformity correction and lengthening in femoral non-union. Femoral non-union is a difficult problem often associated with shortening, angulation, and mal-rotation. We report the use of an intramedullary distraction device, with additional osteotomy, to achieve union, restore femoral length and alignment. Simple distraction in femoral non-union is often ineffective, possibly because the non-union site is relatively avascular. Osteotomy is known to increase blood flow and, with lengthening, promote union through distraction histiogenesis. 7 patients with posttraumatic diaphyseal femoral non-union with shortening were studied. Pre-operative planning included long leg standing views, with CT to measure mal-rotation. 6 patients were treated with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD) with an osteotomy distant from non-union site within the parameters required for the device. One patient underwent distraction without osteotomy. Patients were followed to union. Complications and adjuvant interventions were recorded. All 7 patients with femoral non-union treated with ISKD were included and followed up. Patients treated with osteotomy united at average of 9 months with satisfactory deformity correction and lengthening. However patient who underwent pure distraction failed to unite. Complications included failure to lengthen, requiring manipulation, and delayed consolidation of regenerate requiring bone graft. The procedure was well tolerated. The initial results of the management of femoral non-union with deformity by intramedullary distraction coupled with osteotomy are encouraging. Complications were minor and readily manageable. We believe there is an important role for this method in the management of femoral non-unions associated with deformity and length discrepancy

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (θ) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction. We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. θ = 81 ± sd 2.5°. As expected, θ correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with θ. Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for θ and p on the two sides. We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a variety of distal femoral deformities

We present the results of a new non-invasive lengthening nail enabling accurate control of the lengthening process and joint rehabilitation. Introduction. The use of intramedullary lengthening nails have gained popularity as they reduce common complications associated with external fixators, including infection, joint stiffness, bone regenerate deformity, late fracture and patient implant acceptance. Current nails however are associated with complications including implant breakage, mechanical failure, runaway nail and requiring MUA to restart or obtain segment lengthening. The Precice nail incorporates magnet technology with a hand held device allowing non-invasive lengthening. The nail is also reversible allowing shortening if required. Physiotherapy can continue throughout treatment to maintain joint range of motion without concern of uncontrolled nail runaway. The lengthening is axial reducing shear/torsional forces on the regenerate. Method. The lengthening of 4 femora was undertaken in 3 patients, mean age 34 yrs for post-traumatic shortening and short stature. A standard technique included an Ilizarov corticotomy followed by a 6 day latent period. Patients were mobilised partial weight bearing and knee range of motion maintained. The femora were lengthened one third of a millimetre three times per day. Radiographic and clinical review was performed every 2 weeks. Results. The desired femoral length was obtained in all patients, mean 5.6 cms (4.5–6.5). There were no complications of infection, poor bone regenerate or premature consolidation. One patient undergoing bilateral femoral lengthening underwent surgical release of a tight Tensor Fascia Lata following completion of lengthening due to hip flexion contracture. One patient required slowing of the lengthening rate due to knee flexion contracture. Physiotherapy corrected the deformity and the normal lengthening rate could be resumed. Conclusion. The Precice nail is a new device that offers accurate control of the lengthening process and rehabilitation. This should reduce complications of poor regenerate formation and soft tissue contractures

Objective. Failures of internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures pose great challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. Hip arthroplasty can be a remedy for such failures, however, the selection of femoral stem length is controversial. This study aims to report our experience of managing failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures with standard femoral stem arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective review of patients who were managed with hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures in the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, P.R. China between January 2001 to December 2013 was performed. Patients’ age, gender, pre- and postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), femoral stem types and surgical outcomes were traced and analyzed. Results. 14 patients were included. The average age at the time of internal fixation and hip arthroplasty was 74.6 years old (Range, 56–89) and 75.8 years old (Range, 58–90), respectively. The time duration between internal fixation and hip arthroplasty ranged from 3 to 26 months. 5 were total hip arthroplasty while 9 were hemiarthroplasty. 4 were implanted with long femoral stems while 10 with standard stems, including 4 cementless (SL-PLUS, Smith & Nephew)and 6 cemented stems. Standard femoral stems were defined as ones that are designed to be used in primary hip replacement, with the length of which ranging from 120 to 140mm. The distal ends of these stems did not exceed the distal screw hole levels of 2 cortical diameters. After a mean follow-up time of 6.4 years (Range, 1–13), 2 patients lost to follow-up and 2 died of non-surgically related diseases. For the 8 cases with standard stems, at the latest follow-up, no periprosthetic fractures or periprosthetic joint infections were observed. A total of 3 hip dislocations happened in 2 patients but were managed successfully with manipulative reduction followed by hip brace. The HHS score increased from an average of 35.6 preoperatively to 79.4 after surgery. Conclusions. Hip arthroplasty can be performed as revision for failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures. Use of standard femoral stems is less invasive, reduces expenditure and can also achieve similar satisfactory clinical outcomes as long femoral stems. However, the long-term clinical outcomes required further follow-up