Aims. The impact of a diaphyseal femoral deformity on knee alignment varies according to its severity and localization. The aims of this study were to determine a method of assessing the impact of diaphyseal femoral deformities on knee alignment for the varus knee, and to evaluate the reliability and the reproducibility of this method in a large cohort of osteoarthritic patients. Methods. All patients who underwent a knee arthroplasty from 2019 to 2021 were included. Exclusion criteria were genu valgus, flexion contracture (> 5°), previous femoral osteotomy or fracture, total hip arthroplasty, and femoral rotational disorder. A total of 205 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62.2 years (SD 8.4). The mean BMI was 33.1 kg/m. 2. (SD 5.5). The radiological measurements were performed twice by two independent reviewers, and included hip knee ankle (HKA) angle, mechanical medial distal femoral angle (mMDFA), anatomical medial distal femoral angle (aMDFA), femoral neck shaft angle (NSA), femoral bowing angle (FBow), the distance between the knee centre and the top of the FBow (DK), and the angle representing the FBow impact on the knee (C’KS angle). Results. The FBow impact on the mMDFA can be measured by the C’KS angle. The C’KS angle took the localization (length DK) and the importance (FBow angle) of the FBow into consideration. The mean FBow angle was 4.4° (SD 2.4; 0 to 12.5). The mean C’KS angle was 1.8° (SD 1.1; 0 to 5.8). Overall, 84 knees (41%) had a severe FBow (> 5°). The radiological measurements showed very good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreements. The C’KS increased significantly when the length DK decreased and the FBow angle increased (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The impact of the diaphyseal femoral deformity on the mechanical femoral axis is measured by the C’KS angle, a reliable and reproducible measurement. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(4):262–272

The goal is to avoid letting femoral deformity force suboptimal implant position/fixation. Suboptimal implant position has an adverse effect on hip biomechanics and often on hip function and durability. Classification - Practical approach to femoral deformities: categorise into 3 main groups: 1.) Very proximal, 2.) Subtrochanteric, 3.) Distal. Management of distal deformities: Most can be ignored if there is sufficient room to place conventional femoral implant. Management of proximal deformities: Option 1: Use implants that allow satisfactory positioning despite deformity…or… Option 2: Remove the deformity. Management of subtrochanteric level deformities: These are the most difficult. Problems: 1.) Too proximal to ignore, 2.) Too distal to bypass. Main treatment options: 1.) Resurfacing THA, 2.) Short stem THA, 3.) Corrective osteotomy with THA. Corrective osteotomy with THA: 1.) Perform osteotomy at level of deformity, 2.) In most cases a corrective osteotomy that creates a transverse osteotomy junction is simplest, 3.) Use an implant that provides reliable fixation in the femur (usually uncemented), 4.) Use implant that provides fixation of the proximal and distal fragments. Majority of proximal femoral deformities managed with one-stage procedure: 1.) Excise deformity and replace with metal, 2.) Implants that allow ignoring deformity, 3.) Corrective osteotomy

Introduction: The goal is to avoid letting femoral deformity force suboptimal implant position/fixation. Suboptimal implant position has an adverse effect on hip biomechanics and often on hip function and durability. Classification: Practical approach to femoral deformities: categorise into 3 main groups: Very proximal, Subtrochanteric, Distal. Management: Management of distal deformities: Most can be ignored if there is sufficient room to place conventional femoral implant. Management of proximal deformities: Option 1: Use implants that allow satisfactory positioning despite deformity…or… Option 2: Remove the deformity. Management of subtrochanteric level deformities: These are the most difficult. Problems: Too proximal to ignore, Too distal to bypass. Main treatment options: Resurfacing THA, Short stem THA, Corrective osteotomy with THA. Corrective osteotomy with THA: Perform osteotomy at level of deformity, In most cases a corrective osteotomy that creates a transverse osteotomy junction is simplest, Use an implant that provides reliable fixation in the femur (usually uncemented), Use implant that provides fixation of the proximal and distal fragments. Conclusions: Majority of proximal femoral deformities managed with one-stage procedure: Excise deformity and replace with metal, Implants that allow ignoring deformity, Corrective osteotomy

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the deformities. However, distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We describe a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylised as a block. A line bisecting the anatomical axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (?) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis, and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of deformity, permitting accurate correction. We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. We found this technique to be universally robust in a variety of distal femoral deformities

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (θ) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction. We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. θ = 81 ± sd 2.5°. As expected, θ correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with θ. Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for θ and p on the two sides. We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a variety of distal femoral deformities

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (Θ) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction. We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. Θ = 81 ± sd 2.5. As expected, Θ correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with Θ. Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for Θ and p on the two sides. We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a variety of distal femoral deformities

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and limb dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between the anatomic and mechanical axes. We have found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We have devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylised as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (𝛉) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction. We have examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using one hundred normal femurs. Θ=81+/− sd 2.5°. As expected, 𝛉 correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distal from the medial edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% +/− sd 8%. P was not correlated with 𝛉. Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of twenty paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for 𝛉 and p on the two sides. We have employed this technique in a variety of distal femoral deformities, including vitamin D resistant rickets, growth arrest, fibula hemimelia, post-traumatic deformity and Ellis-van Creveld syndrome. We find the system universally applicable and reliable

Children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) frequently present with coxa vara (CV). Skeletal fragility, severe deformity and limited fixation options make this a challenging condition to correct surgically. Our study aimed to determine the efficacy of the Fassier technique to correct CV and determine the complication rate.

Retrospective, descriptive case series from a tertiary hospital. We retrospectively reviewed records of a cohort of eight children (four females, 12 hips) with OI (6/8 Sillence type III, 2/8 type IV) who had surgical treatment with Fassier technique for CV between 2014 and 2020.

Inclusion Criteria: All patients with CV secondary to OI treated surgically with Fassier technique.

Exclusion Criteria: Patients older than 18 years; Patients with CV treated non-operatively or by surgical technique different to Fassier technique.

Data relating to the following parameters was collected and analyzed: demographic data, pre- and postoperative neck shaft angle (NSA), complications and NSA at final follow-up.

The mean age at operation was 5.8 years (range 2–10). The mean NSA was corrected from 96.8° preoperatively to 137º postoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 38.6 months, the mean NSA was maintained at 133°, and 83% (10/12) of hips had an NSA that remained greater than 120°. There was a 42% (5/12) complication rate: three Fassier–Duval rods failed to expand after distal epiphyseal fixation was lost during growth; one Rush rod migrated through the lateral proximal femur cortex with recurrent coxa vara; and one Rush rod migrated proximally and required rod revision.

The Fassier technique effectively corrected CV in children with moderate and progressively deforming OI. The deformity correction was maintained in the short term. The complication rate was high, but mainly related to the failed expansion of the Fassier–Duval rods.

Introduction. Patients who are symptomatic with concurrent acetabular dysplasia and proximal femoral deformity may have Perthes disease. Osteotomies to correct both the acetabular and proximal femur deformities may optimise biomechanics and improve pain and function. In this study, we assessed the long-term results for such a combined procedure. Methods. We included patients who underwent concurrent pelvic and proximal femoral osteotomies by the senior surgeon (JNOH) with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. A modified triple pelvic interlocking osteotomy was performed to correct acetabular inclination and/or version with a concurrent proximal femoral osteotomy to correct valgus/varus and/or rotational alignment. We assessed functional scores, radiological paramenters, arthroplasty conversion rate, time interval before conversion to arthroplasty and other associated complications. Results. We identified 63 patients (64 hips) with a mean age of 29.2 years (range 14.3–51) at a mean follow-up of 10.1 years (range 5.1–18.5). The mean sourcil inclination postoperatively was 4.9. O. (range 1–12) compared to 24. O. (range 14.5–33) preoperatively. The mean Tonnis grade postoperatively was 2.2 (1–3) compared to 1.8 (range 1–2) preoperatively. At the last follow-up assessment, the mean Oxford Hip Score was 56 (range 60–47), Non-arthritic Hip Score was 71 (range 59–80) and UCLA activity score was 8 (range 5–10). There were 12 (18.8%) conversions to arthroplasty at a mean of 7.9 years (range 2.2–12.2) after surgery. Other associated complications include 1 sciatic nerve injury, 1 deep infection and 5 non-unions that required refixation. Discussion. Symptomatic acetabular dysplasia with concurrent proximal femoral deformity is difficult to treat. The use of combined pelvic and femoral osteotomies can optimise acetabular and femoral head alignment to improve pain and function with more than 4 out of 5 hips preserved at 10 years

Introduction. Patients who are symptomatic with concurrent acetabular dysplasia and proximal femoral deformity may have Perthes disease. Osteotomies to correct both the acetabular and proximal femur deformities may optimise biomechanics and improve pain and function. In this study, we assessed the long-term results for such a combined procedure. Methods. We included patients who underwent concurrent pelvic and proximal femoral osteotomies by the senior surgeon (JNOH) with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. A modified triple pelvic interlocking osteotomy was performed to correct acetabular inclination and/or version with a concurrent proximal femoral osteotomy to correct valgus/varus and/or rotational alignment. We assessed functional scores, radiological paramenters, arthroplasty conversion rate, time interval before conversion to arthroplasty and other associated complications. Results. We identified 63 patients (64 hips) with a mean age of 29.2 years (range 14.3–51) at a mean follow-up of 10.1 years (range 5.1–18.5). The mean sourcil inclination postoperatively was 4.9. O. (range 1–12) compared to 24. O. (range 14.5–33) preoperatively. The mean Tonnis grade postoperatively was 2.2 (1–3) compared to 1.8 (range 1–2) preoperatively. At the last follow-up assessment, the mean Oxford Hip Score was 56 (range 60–47), Non-arthritic Hip Score was 71 (range 59–80) and UCLA activity score was 8 (range 5–10). There were 12 (18.8%) conversions to arthroplasty at a mean of 7.9 years (range 2.2–12.2) after surgery. Other associated complications include 1 sciatic nerve injury, 1 deep infection and 5 non-unions that required refixation. Discussion. Symptomatic acetabular dysplasia with concurrent proximal femoral deformity is difficult to treat. The use of combined pelvic and femoral osteotomies can optimise acetabular and femoral head alignment to improve pain and function with more than 4 out of 5 hips preserved at 10 years

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and clinical outcome of patients with a femoral shaft fracture and a previous complex post-traumatic femoral malunion who were treated with a clamshell osteotomy and fixation with an intramedullary nail (IMN).

Purpose: Use of six-axis analysis and computer assisted deformity correction via a circular external fixator is a new method for deformity correction. We investigated its accuracy and safety in reconstruction of femoral deformity in children and young adults. Method: We retrospectively reviewed all cases including the indications for use and the methodology of application of the computer assisted six-axis analysis and circular external fixator for reconstruction of 22 femora in 20 patients. Twelve patients were female, and 8 were male. The average age was 13.9 (range, 5.9–24.6). Etiology included traumatic (7), idiopathic (6), multiple enchondromatosis (2), rickets (2), congenital femoral deficiency (2), spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (1), congenital pseudohypoparathyroidisim (1), and multifocal osteomyelitis (1). Clinical and radiographic data were analyzed. Results: Average follow-up was 14.4 months (range, 4.5–32). Average time in frame was 6.2 months (range, 2.6–19). Bone lengthening of 3.9 cm (range, 1–8.5) was performed in 12 femora. In genu valgum patients, the mLDFA improved from a mean of 73.7° to a mean of 89°. In genu varum patients, the mLDFA improved from a mean of 99.8° to a mean of 89.5°. Complications included pin tract infection in 6, knee stiffness in 3, delayed union in 2, skin irritation in 1, posterior knee subluxation in 2, both of which had stable knees preoperatively. One patient was lost to follow-up and returned back with deformity. No complications occurred in 8 patients. Conclusion: Computer assisted femoral deformity correction with six-axis analysis and application of circular external fixator is a useful technique with the advantage of managing multiplanar deformities in children and young adults. It has the potential complications of the use of any external fixator. Close follow-up is necessary to avoid subluxation of the knee joint even in patients with stable knees. Accurate and safe correction can be achieved in almost all patients

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often present femoral bone deformities not accounted for in generic musculoskeletal models [1,2]. MRI-based models can be used to include subject-specific muscle paths [3,4], although this is a time-demanding process. Recently, non-rigid deformation techniques have been used to transform generic bone geometry, including muscle points, onto personalized bones [5]. However, it is still unknown to what extent such an approximation of subject-specific detail affects calculated hip contact forces (HCFs) during gait in CP children. Seven children diagnosed with diplegic CP walked independently at self-selected speed. 3D marker trajectories were captured using Vicon (Oxford Metrics, UK) and force data was measured using two AMTI force platforms (Watertown, MA). MR-images were acquired (Philips Ingenia 1.5T) of all subjects lying supine. Firstly, a generic model [6] was scaled using the marker positions of a static pose. Secondly, a MRI-model containing the subject-specific bone structures and muscle paths of all hip and upper leg muscles was created [3]. Thirdly, the generic femur and pelvis geometries and muscle points were transformed onto the image-based femur and pelvis using an advanced non-rigid deformation procedure (Materialise N.V.). For all models, further analyses were performed in OpenSim 3.1 [7]. A kalman smoother procedure was used to calculate joint angles [8]. Muscle forces were calculated using a static optimization minimizing the sum of squared muscle activities. Next, HCFs were calculated and normalized to body weight (BW). First and second peak HCFs were determined and used for a Kruskal-Wallis test to determine differences between models. In case of a significant difference, a post-hoc rank-based multiple comparison test with Bonferonni adjustment was used. Further, average absolute differences in muscle points between the models was calculated, as well as average differences in moment arm lengths (MALs), reflecting muscle function. Where the scaled generic muscle points differed on average 2.49cm from the MRI points, the non-rigidly deformed points differed 1.54cm from the MRI muscle points. Specifically, the tensor fascia latae differed most between the deformed and MRI models (11.7cm). When considering MALs, the gluteii muscles present an altered function for the generic and deformed models compared to the MRI model for all degrees of freedom of the hip at the time of both HCF peaks. The differences between models resulted in a significantly increased second peak HCF for the MRI models compared to the generic models (first peak average HCF: 3.88BW, 3.95BW and 4.90BW; second peak average HCF: 3.03BW, 4.89BW and 5.32BW for the generic, MRI and non-rigidly deformed models respectively). Although not significantly different, the deformed models calculated slightly increased HCFs compare to the MRI models. The generic models underestimated HCFs compared to the MRI models, while the non-rigidly deformed models slightly overestimated HCFs. However, differences between the deformed and MRI models in terms of muscle points and MALs remain, specifically for the gluteii muscles. Therefore, further user-guided modification of the model based on MR-images will be necessary

Introduction

Many patients who had previous proximal femoral osteotomies develop deformities that may not be amenable to total hip replacement (THR) with standard off-the-shelf femoral stems. Previous studies have shown high revision rates (18% at 5–10 years follow-up). Computer-assisted-design computer-assisted-manufacture (CAD-CAM) femoral stems are indicated but the results are not known. We assessed the clinical results of THR using CAD-CAM femoral stems specifically for this group of patients.

As the number of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty rises, the number of patients who require surgery for a failed total hip arthroplasty is also increasing. It is estimated that 183,000 total hip replacements were performed in the United States in the year 2000 and that 31,000 of these (17%) were revision procedures. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging from a technical perspective and in pre-operative planning. With multiple reconstructive options available, it is helpful to have a classification system which guides the surgeon in selecting the appropriate method of reconstruction. A classification of femoral deficiency has been developed and an algorithmic approach to femoral reconstruction is presented.

Type I:

Minimal loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often seen when conversion of a cementless femoral component without biological ingrowth surface requires revision. Type II: Extensive loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often encountered after the removal of a cemented femoral component. Type IIIA: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with more than 4cm of intact diaphyseal bone for distal fixation. This type of defect is commonly seen after removal of grossly loose femoral components inserted with first generation cementing techniques. Type IIIB: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with less than 4cm of diaphyseal bone available for distal fixation. This type of defect is often seen following failure of a cemented femoral component that was inserted with a cement restrictor and cementless femoral components associated with significant distal osteolysis. Type IV: Extensive meta-diaphyseal damage in conjunction with a widened femoral canal. The isthmus is non-supportive.

An extensively coated, diaphyseal filling component reliable achieves successful fixation in the majority of revision femurs. The surgical technique is straightforward and we continue to use this type of device in the majority of our revision total hip arthroplasties. However, in the severely damaged femur (Type IIIB and Type IV), other reconstructive options may provide improved results.

Revision of the failed femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty can be challenging. Multiple reconstructive options are available and the operation itself can be particularly difficult and thus meticulous pre-operative planning is required to pick the right “tool” for the case at hand. The Paprosky Femoral Classification is useful as it helps the surgeon determine what bone stock is available for fixation and hence, which type of femoral reconstruction is most appropriate.

Monoblock, fully porous coated diaphyseal engaging femoral components are the “work-horse” of femoral revision and are used in my practice for approximately 70% of reconstructions. These stems are associated with problems, in the following situations: The canal diameter is greater than 18mm; There is less than 4cm available for distal fixation in the isthmus; There is proximal femoral remodeling into retroversion.

When the limits of monoblock stems are exceeded, we use modular tapered femoral components. These stems in general allow for better fixation in short isthmic segments and the bi-body nature allows for independent positioning of the proximal body, which is particularly helpful when the femur has remodeled into retroversion.

Angular proximal femoral deformities increase the technical complexity of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs). The goals were to determine the long-term implant survivorship, risk factors, complications, and clinical outcomes of contemporary primary THAs in this difficult cohort. Our institutional total joint registry was used to identify 119 primary THAs performed in 109 patients with an angular proximal femoral deformity between 1997 and 2017. The deformity was related to previous femoral osteotomy in 85%, and developmental or metabolic disorders in 15%. 53% had a predominantly varus angular deformity. The mean age was 44 years, mean BMI was 29 kg/m. 2. , and 59% were female. An uncemented metaphyseal fixation stem was used in 30%, an uncemented diaphyseal fixation stem in 28%, an uncemented modular body stem with metaphyseal fixation sleeve in 24%, and a cemented stem in 18%. Simultaneous corrective femoral osteotomy was performed in 18%. Kaplan-Meier survivorships and Harris hip scores were reported. Mean follow-up was 8 years. The 10-year survivorships free of femoral loosening, aseptic femoral revision, any revision, and any reoperation were 95%, 93%, 90% and 88%, respectively. Revisions occurred in 13 hips for: aseptic femoral component loosening (3), stem fracture (2), dislocation (2), aseptic acetabular loosening (2), polyethylene liner exchange (2), and infection (2). Preoperative varus angular deformities were associated with a higher risk of any revision (HR 10, p=0.03), and simultaneous osteotomies with a higher risk of any reoperation (HR 3.6, p=0.02). Mean Harris hip scores improved from 52 preoperatively to 82 at 10 years (p<0.001). In the largest series to date of primary THAs in patients with angular proximal femoral deformities, we found a good 10-year survivorship free from any revision. Varus angular deformities, particularly those treated with a simultaneous osteotomy due to the magnitude or location of the deformity, had a higher reoperation rate. Keywords: Proximal femoral deformity; dysplasia; femoral osteotomy; survivorship; revision. Level of evidence: Level III, comparative retrospective cohort

Introduction. Angular deformities of the distal femur can be corrected by opening, closing and neutral wedge techniques. Opening wedge (OW) and closing wedge (CW) are popular and well described in the literature. CW and OW techniques lead to leg length difference whereas the advantage of neutral wedge (NW) technique has several unique advantages. NW technique maintains limb length, wedge taken from the closing side is utilised on the opening side and since the angular correction is only half of the measured wedge on either side, translation of distal fragment is minimum. Leg lengths are not altered with this technique hence a useful technique in large deformities. We found no reports of clinical outcomes using NW technique. We present a technique of performing external fixator assisted NW correction of large valgus and varus deformities of distal femur and dual plating and discuss the results. Materials & Methods. We have treated 20 (22 limbs – 2 patients requiring staged bilateral corrections) patients for distal femoral varus and valgus deformities with CWDFO between 2019 and 2022. Out of these 4 patients (5 limbs) requiring large corrections of distal femoral angular deformities were treated with Neutral Wedge (NW) technique. 3 patients (four limbs) had distal femoral valgus deformity and one distal femoral varus deformity. Indication for NW technique is an angular deformity (varus or valgus of distal femur) requiring > 12 mm opening/closing wedge correction. We approached the closing side first and marked out the half of the calculated wedge with K – wires in a uniplanar fashion. Then an external fixator with two Schanz screws is applied on the opposite side, inserting the distal screw parallel to the articular surface and the proximal screw 6–7 cm proximal to the first pin and at right angles to the femoral shaft mechanical axis. Then the measured wedge is removed and carefully saved. External fixator is now used to close the wedge and over correct, creating an appropriate opening wedge on the opposite side. A Tomofix (Depuoy Synthes) plate is applied on the closing side with two screws proximal to osteotomy and two distally (to be completed later). Next the osteotomy on the opposite side is exposed, the graft is inserted. mLDFA is measured under image intensifier to confirm satisfactory correction. Closing wedge side fixation is then completed followed by fixation of opposite side with a Tomofix or a locking plate. Results. 3 patients (4 limbs) had genu valgum due to constitutional causes and one was a case of distal femoral varus from a fracture. Preoperative mLDFA ranged from 70–75° and in one case of varus deformity it was 103°. We achieved satisfactory correction of mLDFA in (85–90°) in 4 limbs and one measured 91°. Femoral length was not altered. JLCA was not affected post correction. Patients were allowed to weight bear for transfers for the first six weeks and full weight bearing was allowed at six weeks with crutches until healing of osteotomy. All osteotomies healed at 16–18 weeks (average 16.8 weeks). Patients regained full range of movement. We routinely recommend removal of metal work to facilitate future knee replacement if one is needed. Follow up ranged from 4 months to 2 yrs. Irritation from metal work was noted in 2 patients and resolved after removing the plates at 9 months post-surgery. Conclusions. NWDFO is a good option for large corrections. We describe a technique that facilitates accurate correction of deformity in these complex cases. Osteotomy heals predictably with uniplanar osteotomy and dual plate fixation. Metal work might cause irritation like other osteotomy and plating techniques in this location

We sought to determine the short to medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes using a short stem in young adults with a proximal femoral deformity (PFD). We prospectively studied 31 patients (35 hips) with PFDs treated with an uncemented primary THA using a short stem with cervicometaphyseal fixation between 2011–2018. There were 19 male (23 hips) and 12 female (12 hips) patients, with a mean BMI of 26.7±4.1 kg/m. 2. Twelve cases had a previous surgical procedure, and six of them were failed childhood osteotomies. Mean age of the series was 44±12 years, mean follow-up was 81±27 months and no patients were lost to follow-up. PFDs were categorized according to a modified Berry´s classification. Average preoperative leg-length discrepancy (LLD) was −16.3 mm (−50 to 2). At a mean time of 81 months of follow-up, survival rate was 97% taking revision of the stem for any reason and 100% for aseptic loosening as endpoints. No additional femoral osteotomy was required in any case. Average surgical time was 66 minutes (45 to 100). There was a significant improvement in the mHHS score when comparing preoperative and postoperative values (47.3±10.6 vs. 92.3±3.7, p=0.0001). Postoperative LLD was in average 1 mm (−9 to 18) (p=0.0001). According to Engh's criteria, all stems were classified as stable without signs of loosening. Postoperative complications included 1 pulmonary embolism, 1 neurogenic sciatic pain, 1 transient sciatic nerve palsy that recovered completely after six months, and 2 acute periprosthetic joint infections. One patient suffered a Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture 45 days after surgery and was revised with a modular distally fixed uncemented fluted stem. A type 2B short stem evidenced promising outcomes at short to medium-term follow up in young adult patients with PFDs, avoiding the need for corrective osteotomies and a revision stem

Introduction. Osteogenesis imperfect (OI) is a geno- and phenotypically heterogeneous group of congenital collagen disorders characterized by fragility and microfractures resulting in long bone deformities. OI can lead to progressive femoral coxa vara from bone and muscular imbalance and continuous microfracture about the proximal femur. If left untreated, patients develop Trendelenburg gait, leg length discrepancy, further stress fracture and acute fracture at the apex of the deformity, impingement and hip joint degeneration. In the OI patient, femoral coxa vara cannot be treated in isolation and consideration must be given to protecting the whole bone with the primary goal of verticalization and improved biomechanical stability to allow early loading, safe standing, re-orientation of the physis and avoidance of untreated sequelae. Implant constructs should therefore be designed to accommodate and protect the whole bone. The normal paediatric femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) ranges from 135 to 145 degrees. In OI the progressive pathomechanical changes result in FNSA of significantly less than 120 degrees and decreased Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angles (HEA). Proximal femoral valgus osteotomy is considered the standard surgical treatment for coxa vara and multiple surgical techniques have been described, each with their associated complications. In this paper we present the novel technique of controlling femoral version and coronal alignment using a tubular plate and long bone protection with the use of teleoscoping rods. Methodology. After the decision to operate had been made, a CT scan of the femur was performed. A 1:1 scale 3D printed model (AXIAL3D, Belfast, UK) was made from the CT scan to allow for accurate implant templating and osteotomy planning. In all cases a subtrochanteric osteotomy was performed and fixed using a pre-bent 3.5 mm 1/3 tubular plate. The plate was bent to allow one end to be inserted into the proximal femur to act as a blade. A channel into the femoral neck was opened using a flat osteotome. The plate was then tapped into the femoral neck to the predetermined position. The final position needed to allow one of the plate holes to accommodate the growing rod. This had to be determined pre operatively using the 3D printed model and the implants. The femoral canal was reamed, and the growing rod was placed in the femur, passing through the hole in the plate to create a construct that could effectively protect both the femoral neck and the full length of the shaft. The distal part of the plate was then fixed to the shaft using eccentric screws around the nail to complete the construct. Results. Three children ages 5,8 and 13 underwent the procedure. Five coxa vara femurs have undergone this technique with follow-up out to 62 months (41–85 months) from surgery. Improvements in the femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) were av. 18. o. (10–38. o. ) with pre-op coxa vara FNSA av. 99. o. (range 87–114. o. ) and final FNSA 117. o. (105–125. o. ). Hilgenreiner's epiphyseal angle was improved by av. 29. o. (2–58. o. ). However only one hip was restored to <25. o. In the initial technique employed for 3 hips, the plates were left short in the neck to avoid damaging the physis. This resulted in 2 of 3 hips fracturing through the femoral neck above the plate at approximately 1 year. There were revisions of the 3 hips to longer plates to prevent intra-capsular stress riser. All osteotomies united and both intracapsular fractures healed. No further fractures have occurred within the protected femurs and no other repeat operations have been required. Conclusions. Surgical correction of the OI coxa vara hip is complex. Bone mineral density, multiplanar deformity, a desire to maintain physeal growth and protection of the whole bone all play a role in the surgeon's decision making process. Following modifications, this technique demonstrates a novel method in planning and control of multiplanar proximal femoral deformity, resulting in restoration of the FNSA to a more appropriate anatomical alignment, preventing long bone fracture and improved femoral verticalization in the medium term follow-up