Aims. Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest. Methods. A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS). Results. In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures. Conclusion. A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):236–242

Aim. The treatment of fracture-related infections (FRI) focuses on obtaining fracture healing and eradicating infection to prevent osteomyelitis. Treatment guidelines include removal, exchange, or retention of the implants used according to the stability of the fracture and the time from the infection. Infection of a fracture in the process of healing with a stable fixation may be treated with implant retention, debridement, and antibiotics. Nonetheless, the retention of an intramedullary nail is a potential risk factor for failure, and it is recommended to exchange or remove the nail. This surgical approach implies additional life-threatening risks in elderly fragile hip fracture patients. Our study aimed to analyze the results of implant retention for the treatment of infected nails in elderly hip fracture patients. Methods. Our retrospective analysis included patients 65 years of age or older with an acute fracture-related infection treated with implant retention from 2012 to 2020 in 6 Spanish hospitals with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients that required open reduction during the initial fracture surgery were excluded. Variables included in our analysis were patient demographics, type of fracture, date of FRI diagnosis, causative microorganism, and outcome. Treatment success was defined as fracture healing with infection eradication without the need for further hospitalization. Results. A total of 48 patients were identified. Eight patients with open reduction were excluded and 11 did not complete a 1-year follow-up. Out of the 29 remaining patients, the mean age was 81.5 years, with a 21:9, female to male ratio. FRI was diagnosed between 10 and 48 days after initial surgery (mean 26 days). Treatment success was achieved in 24 patients (82.7%). Failure was objectivated in polymicrobial infections or infections caused by microorganisms resistant to antibiofilm antibiotics. Seven patients required more than one debridement with a success rate of 57%. Twelve patients had an infection diagnosed after 21 days from the initial surgery and implant retention was successful in all of them. Conclusion. Our results suggest implant retention is a valid therapeutic approach for fracture-related infection in elderly hip fracture patients treated by closed reduction and intramedullary nailing

Background. This clinical study aims to establish the rate of operative inadvertent hypothermia (IH) in elderly hip fracture patients (>65 years old). We postulate that differences exist in risk factors and hypothesised poorer outcomes in patients with IH. Methods. A single centre, retrospective study of 929 hip fracture patients managed operatively between June 2015 and July 2017 was conducted. Patients’ demographic, anaesthetic and surgical variables were analysed together with outcomes for length of stay (LOS), 30-day re-admissions, and 30-day mortality. Results. Overall rates of IH in elderly hip fracture patients undergoing surgery were 10%, with increasing age as a risk factor (p = 0.005). There was trend towards IH in patients receiving sliding hip screw (SHS) (p = 0.079). No difference in LOS was observed between IH and normothermic patients (8.9 ± 7.1 versus 8.6 ± 4.9, p= 0.51). 30-day re-admissions were 18.5% for IH patients versus 7.8% in normothermic patients (p<0.001). There was a trend towards a higher 30-day mortality (p = 0.089), and a significantly higher mortality in IH patients undergoing SHS (p = 0.014). Conclusion. Rates of IH are high in operatively managed hip fracture patients. IH is significantly associated with a higher 30-day readmission rate with a trend towards higher 30-day mortality. This study mandates an examination of strategies for maintaining normothermia in operatively managed elderly hip fracture patients

Introduction

Following publication of the Ankle Injury Management (AIM) trial in 2016 which compared the management of ankle fractures with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed contact casting (CCC), we looked at how the results of this study have been adopted into practice in a trauma unit in the United Kingdom.

Aims

Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery.

Purpose. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of early and delayed surgery on the risk of mortality, common post-operative complications, and length of hospital stay among elderly hip fracture patients. Methods. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant prospective studies evaluating surgical delay in patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures published in all languages between 1966 and 2008. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted relevant data. Results. Of 1939 citations identified, 16 observational studies that included a total of 13,478 patients with complete mortality data (1764 total deaths) met our inclusion criteria. Irrespective of the cut-off for delay (24, 48, or 72 hours), earlier surgery (< 24, < 48, or < 72 hours) was significantly associated with a reduction in the risk of unadjusted one-year mortality (relative risk 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.75, p=0.0002) and adjusted mortality rates (relative risk 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.96, p=0.01). Based on unadjusted data, earlier surgery also reduced in-hospital pneumonia (relative risk 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.93, p=0.02), pressure sores (relative risk 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.69, p< 0.0001) and hospital stay (weighted mean difference 9.95 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 18.39, p=0.02). Conclusion. Earlier surgery was associated with a reduced risk of mortality, post-operative pneumonia, pressure sores, and length of hospital stay among elderly hip fracture patients. This suggests that it may be warranted to reduce surgical delays whenever possible. However, unadjusted analyses are certainly confounded, and residual confounding may be responsible for apparent effects in adjusted analyses. A definitive answer to this issue will require the conduct of a large randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of earlier surgery among patients admitted with a hip fracture

Purpose: Hip fractures are associated with a high rate of mortality and profound temporary and sometimes permanent impairment of independence and quality of life. While guidelines exist for the surgical treatment of hip fracture patients, the effect of surgical delay on mortality and other patient-important outcomes remains unclear. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of early surgery compared with delayed surgery on the risk of mortality, common postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay among elderly hip fracture patients. Method: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant prospective studies evaluating surgical delay in patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures published in all languages between 1966 and 2008. We identified additional studies through contacting experts, as well as hand searches of the bibliographies of relevant articles and the archives of orthopaedic annual meetings. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted relevant data. When necessary, we contacted authors for clarification of study design or to provide additional data. Data were pooled by use of a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model based on the inverse variance method. Results: Of 1917 citations identified, 16 observational studies, which included a total of 13,565 patients with complete mortality data, met our inclusion criteria. Irrespective of the cut-off for delay (24, 48, or 72 hours), earlier surgery (< 24, < 48, or < 72 hours) was significantly associated with a reduction in the risk of unadjusted one-year mortality (relative risk 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.75, p=0.0002) and adjusted mortality rates (relative risk 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.96, p=0.01). Earlier surgery also reduced in-hospital pneumonia (relative risk 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.93, p=0.02), pressure sores (relative risk 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.69, p< 0.0001) and hospital stay (weighted mean difference 9.95 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 18.39, p=0.02). Conclusion: Earlier surgery reduced the risk of mortality, postoperative pneumonia, pressure sores, and length of hospital stay among elderly hip fracture patients suggesting that it may be warranted to reduce administrative delays whenever possible. However, potential residual confounding of observational studies may limit any definitive conclusions

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assess the prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in hip fracture patients, prior to fracture. Materials and Methods: We interviewed and reviewed medical files of 127 patients (39 men and 88 women), with an average age of 81.25. All were admitted with a hip fracture caused by minor trauma between February and June 2004. Data was collected regarding previous fractures, DEXA (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) examination and previous drug therapy. Results: 31 patients (24.4%) were previously diagnosed as osteoporotic. 19 patients (15%) had a DEXA examination in the past, and 17 of them were positive. 20 patients (15.7%) were treated with vitamin D and calcium supplements. 11 patients (8.7%) were treated with specific antiosteoporotic drugs. 36 patients (28.3%) had a previous fracture within 10 years, including 18 hip fractures. In 19 patients information about fractures could not be obtained due to dementia. Of this 36, only 7 (19.4%) had a DEXA examination, and 14 (38.9%) were diagnosed as osteoporotic. 5 patients in this group (13.9%) were treated with an antiosteoporotic drug. Conclusions: Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in elderly population is insufficient. Even after suffering a fracture, most elderly people are not investigated for bone density. In patients who are diagnosed as osteoporotic, only one third are treated with specific drugs

Introduction

The calcium-PTH-vitamin D-axis has long been highlighted for its effects on bone status and much interest has been given to how this relates to the risk of sustaining an osteoporotic fracture. Little attention has on the other hand been given to how disturbances in this axis, as for example secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), relate to mortality among hip fracture patients. We therefore wanted to determine if SHPT could predict mortality in this group of patients.

A clinical evaluation of the effect of MRI scan to bring about a change in surgical management of elderly patients who present with hip fracture with no history of trauma or a suspicious looking lesion on x-rays. Many of these patients present with or without history of previous malignancy or bone disorder.

We evaluated that if the delay in treatment within 36 hours as per national guide lines is justified to benefit patients.

Current recommendations advocate for surgery within 48 hours from time of injury as a keystone in care for elderly patients with hip fractures. A spare population density within regional Australia provides physical challenges to meet time critical care parameters. This study aims to review the impact of delays to timely surgery for elderly hip fracture patients within a regional Australian population. A retrospective, comparative analysis was undertaken of 140 consecutive hip fracture patients managed at a single rural referral hospital, from June 2020 until June 2021. Factors such as age, time to transfer, time to surgery, 30-day complication and 6-month complication rates were collected. Statistical analysis was performed where applicable. Mean time to surgery was 33.9 hours. A greater proportion of patients whom directly presented underwent surgery within the recommended 48 hours (91.5% vs 75.3%). The statistically significant delay in time to surgery was found to be 6.4 hours. Lower 180-day morbidity and mortality rates were observed in patients undergoing surgery within 48 hours (13.8% vs 36%), This is in comparison to the overall mortality rate of 19.2%. Delay to surgery for elderly hip fracture patients was associated with an increase 30-day and 180-day morbidity and mortality rate. A greater proportion of patients transferred from peripheral hospitals experienced a delay in surgery. Early transfer and prioritization of such patients is recommended to achieve comparative outcomes for rural and remote Australians

The need to accurately forecast the injury burden has never been higher. With an aging, ever expanding trauma population and less than half of the beds available compared to 1990, the National Health Service (NHS) is stretched to breaking point. 1,2. . We utilised a dataset of 22,585 trauma patients across the four countries of the United Kingdom (UK) admitted to 83 hospitals between 22/08/22 – 16/10/22 to determine whether it is possible to predict the proportionality of injuries treated operatively within orthopaedic departments based on their number of Neck of Femur fracture (NOF) patients. More operations were performed for elderly hip fractures alone than for the combined totals of the next four most common fractures: ankle, distal radius, tibial shaft and forearm (6387 vs 5922). Conversely, 10 out of the 13 fracture types were not encountered by at least one hospital and 93% of hospitals encountered less than 2 fractures of a certain type. 60% trauma is treated within Trauma Units (TUs) however, per unit, Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) treat approximately 43% more patients. After excluding NOF, lower limb fractures accounted for approximately 57% of fractures in all countries and ankle and distal radius fracture combined comprised more than 50% in 74% of regions. The number of hip fractures seen on average by an individual unit remains relatively consistent as does the regional variation of any given fracture; resultantly, it is possible to predict injury proportionality based off a unit's hip fracture numbers. This powerful tool could transform both resource allocation and recruitment

Introduction. Ankle fractures in the elderly are an increasing problem with our aging population. Options for treatment include non-operative and operative with a range of techniques available. Failure of treatment can lead to significant complications, morbidity and poor function. We compared the outcomes of two operative techniques, intramedullary hindfoot nailing (IMN) and fibular-pro-tibia fixation (FPT). This is the largest analysis of these techniques and there are no comparative studies published. Method. We retrospectively reviewed patients over the age of 60 with ankle fractures who were treated operatively between 2012 and 2017. We identified 1417 cases, including 27 patients treated with IMN and 41 treated with FPT. Age, sex, co-morbidities and injury pattern were collected. Primary outcome was re-operation rate. Secondary outcomes included other complications, length of stay and functional status. Results. The IMN group had a higher average co-morbidity score compared with the FPT group (estimated 10-year survival, 21% vs 53%, p=0.03). Re-operation rate was higher in the IMN group compared with FPT (12 v 1, p< 0.0001). There were more complications in the IMN group compared with the FPT group (23 v 11, p< 0.0001). Length of stay was longer in the IMN group (17 v 29 days, p=0.02). Mobility tended to return to baseline in the FPT patients but decreased in the IMN patients. Conclusion. Outcomes were worse in the IMN group compared with the FPT group in terms of re-operation, complications and length of stay. However, the IMN group tended to have increased comorbidities and poorer soft tissues. We believe that both techniques have a role in the management of elderly ankle fractures, but patient selection is key. We suggest FPT should be the first-choice technique when soft tissues permit. We discuss the indications, risks and benefits of each method based on our experience and literature review

Abstract. Objectives. The need to accurately forecast the injury burden has never been higher. With an aging, ever expanding trauma population and less than half of the beds available compared to 1990, the National Health Service (NHS) is stretched to breaking point1,2. Resultantly, we aimed to determine whether it is possible to predict the proportionality of injuries treated operatively within orthopaedic departments based on their number of Neck of Femur fracture (NOF) patients reported both in our study and the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Methods. We utilised the ORthopaedic trauma hospital outcomes - Patient operative delays (ORTHOPOD) dataset of 22,585 trauma patients across the four countries of the United Kingdom (UK) admitted to 83 hospitals between 22/08/22 – 16/10/22. This dataset had two arms: arm one was assessing the caseload and theatre capacity, arm two assessed the patient, injury and management demographics. Results. Our results complied with the data reported to the NHFD in over 80% of cases for both the 2022 and five-year average reported numbers. More operations were performed for elderly hip fractures alone than for the combined totals of the next four most common fractures: ankle, distal radius, tibial shaft and forearm (6387 vs 5922). Conversely, 10 out of the 13 fracture types were not encountered by at least one hospital and 93% of hospitals encountered less than 2 fractures of a certain type.60% of trauma is treated within Trauma Units (TUs) however, per unit, Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) treat approximately 43% more patients. Similarly, 11 out of the 14 fracture types examined presented more frequently to a MTC however 3 of the most common fractures had a preponderance for TUs (elderly hip, distal radius and forearm fractures). After excluding NOF, lower limb fractures accounted for approximately 57% of fractures in all countries and ankle and distal radius fracture combined comprised more than 50% in 74% of regions. There were few outliers across the study regarding number of fractures treated by a hospital with tibial shaft fractures demonstrating the highest number of outliers with 4. Conclusions. The number of hip fractures seen on average by an individual unit remains relatively consistent as does the regional variation of any given fracture; resultantly, it is possible to predict injury proportionality based off a unit's hip fracture numbers. This powerful tool could transform both resource allocation and recruitment. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Aims

The aims of this study were to assess quality of life after hip fractures, to characterize respondents to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to describe the recovery trajectory of hip fracture patients.

Elderly femoral neck fractures are often treated with cemented stems according to the reason that bone quality of the patients is not good enough to obtain the initial stability for supporting press fit cementless stem. Some elderly patients also have medullary expanding so called stovepipe canals which make initial stability of press fit stems difficult. Stems with lateral flare have some mechanical advantages to obtain proximal fixation compare to the straight stems without lateral flare. Concerning to initial stability, their vertical loads can be supported not only by proximal medial cortex but also by proximal lateral cortex. The stems also have rotational stability because of the proximal high fit and fill. As lateral flare is a transverse extension in axial section, the stem occupies the proximal canal widely. So it provides strong rotational stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of press fit cementless stem with lateral flare for elderly femoral neck fractures with poor bone quality and with medullary expanding. We performed a retrospective review of the clinical records and radiograghs of consecutive 42 patients (42 hips) of femoral neck fracture operated with cement-less stems with lateral flare in 2005 and 2006. In this period, all displaced femoral neck fractures were operated using cementless stems with lateral flare (Revelation Hip System, DJO, USA) in our hospital. We could follow 24 patients for over one year. 12 of 24 patients had so called stovepipe canals according to Canal Flare Index< 3.0 (Noble et al). Minimum follow up duration was one year. The mean age of the patients at the time of operation was 78.2 years. The mean duration of follow-up was one year and three month. At the time of final follow-up, stem subsidence, stem fixation, spot welds and demarcation line at distal part of stem are assessed on radiograph. And operation time, blood loss at operation and complaint of thigh pain through all the follow up period are also investigated on clinical record. There was no stem subsidence over 2mm and demarcation line in two cases. All stems were assessed bone-grown fixation. We could find at least one spot welds in all patients around porous coated part of the stem. The mean operation time was 60.1 min. and mean blood loss was 240.5 ml. There was no patient who complaints of thigh pain after operation. Cementless stems with lateral flare were seemed to obtain good initial stem fixation for elderly femoral neck fracture patients even they have poor bone quality and medullary expanding

Fracture of the acetabulum can result in damage to the articular surface that ranges from minimal to catastrophic. Hip arthroplasty may be required for more severe injuries due to marked articular surface damage, post traumatic degenerative changes, persistent malunion or nonunion, or occasionally avascular necrosis and destruction of the femoral head. These problems may be seen following both closed and open fracture treatment, but prior open reduction and internal fixation often makes subsequent THA more difficult due to soft tissue scarring and retained hardware. In select acute acetabular fracture cases with severe initial comminution of the joint, open reduction and fixation can be technically impossible or so clearly destined to early failure that initial fracture treatment with combined limited fixation and simultaneous THA is the best option, especially in osteoporotic elderly fracture patients. Problems which may be encountered during any THA in a patient with a prior acetabular fracture include: difficult exposure due to soft tissue defects and scarring, presence of heterotopic ossification, and nerve palsy from the original fracture or subsequent osteosynthesis. Retained hardware can present significant challenges and frequently is left in place or removed in part or completely, when intraarticular in location or blocking preparation of the acetabular cavity and placement of the cup. Additional potential problems include residual deformity and malunion, persistent pelvic dissociation or nonunion of fracture fragments, cavitary or segmental bone loss from displaced or resorbed bone fragments, and occasionally occult deep infection. Preoperative assessment and planning should include careful consideration of the most appropriate surgical approach, which may be impacted by the need for hardware removal. Screening laboratory studies and aspiration of the hip may prove helpful in excluding associated deep infection. Intraoperative sciatic nerve monitoring may be of assistance in patients with partial residual nerve deficits or where extensive posterior exposure and mobilization of the sciatic nerve is needed for hardware removal or excision of heterotopic ossification. Metal cutting tools to allow partial removal of long plates and adjunctive equipment for removal of broken or stripped screws should be routinely available during these cases. Careful preoperative planning regarding implant and reconstructive options can also ensure availability of proper components and equipment. Often implants and techniques developed for revision surgery for management of major bone deficiencies are needed. Reported results suggest that surgery is frequently prolonged, can be associated with greater blood loss and may result in increased risk of post-arthroplasty heterotopic ossification when compared to routine primary procedures. Bone stock and fracture union may be better in patients with prior internal fixation than in those with nonoperative treatment of major displaced acetabular fractures. Available long-term results document more durable results with lower rates of aseptic loosening with uncemented acetabular fixation compared to cemented acetabular components. These patients are at higher risk of revision and failure than patients undergoing THA for simple osteoarthritis, though initial short-term results are comparable to conventional hip arthroplasty patients, as long as early wound healing problems and deep infection can be avoided, which is a greater risk for acute THA for initial fracture care. The application of newer implant designs, highly porous ingrowth materials, and methods for management of acetabular bone deficiency developed for revision THA have helped improve results in this challenging subset of primary THA patients

Introduction. Aged trauma patients with proximal femur fractures are prone to various complications. They may be associated with their comorbidities which also need to be adressed. These complications limit the patient”s postoperative health status and subsequently their activity and independency. As an attempt to improve the postoperative management of aged hip fracture patients a better understanding of the postoperative condition in these patients is necessary. Therefore, this meta-analysis is intended to provide an overview of postoperative complications in the elderly hip fracture patients and to improve the understanding of an adequate postoperative management. Material and method. Medline was used to screen for studies reporting on the complication rates of hip fracture patients > 65 years. The search criteria were: “proximal femur fracture, elderly, complication”. In addition to surgical studies, internal medicine and geriatric studies were also included. Randomized studies, retrospective studies as well as observation studies were included. Furthermore, reoperation rates as well as treatment-related complications were recorded. The 1-year mortality was calculated as outcome parameter. Results. Overall 54 studies were enrolled, published between 2011 and 2016. The mean age of the 9812 patients was 81 years (65–99 years). Follow-up was at least one year. The reoperation rate after osteosynthesis of pertrochanteric femur fractures was 8.7%. The reoperation rate was dependent on the type of fracture and the surgical method. Pneumonia (9,5%) and urinary tract infections (27%) were the most common postoperative infections. With 23%, delirium was one of the most common medical complications. The 1-year mortality rate was 18.7%. Conclusion. Orthogeriatric patients represent a complex patient population. Addressing the special needs of elderly patients reduces postoperative complications. Establishing comanagement or orthogeriatric wards can also be helpful to manage comorbidities and postoperative complications. It is important to not only choose the proper surgical procedure but to monitor orthogeriatric patients closely during their hospitalization

Periprosthetic fractures around the femur during and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain a common mode of failure. It is important therefore to recognise those factors that place patients at increased risk for development of this complication. Prevention of this complication, always trumps treatment. Risk factors can be stratified into: 1. Patient related factors; 2. Host bone and anatomical considerations; 3. Procedural related factors; and 4. Implant related factors. Patient Factors. There are several patient related factors that place patients at risk for development of a periprosthetic fracture during and after total hip arthroplasty. Metabolic bone disease, particularly osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic fracture. In addition, patients that smoke, have long term steroid use or disuse, osteopenia due to inactivity should be identified. A metabolic bone work up and evaluation of bone mineralization with a bone densitometry test can be helpful in identifying and implementing treatment prior to THA. Pre-operative Host Bone and Anatomic Considerations. In addition to metabolic bone disease the “shape of the bone” should be taken into consideration as well. Dorr has described three different types of bone morphology (Dorr A, B, C), each with unique characteristics of size and shape. It is important to recognise that not one single cementless implant may fit all bone types. The importance of templating a THA prior to surgery cannot be overstated. Stem morphology must be appropriately matched to patient anatomy. Today, several types of cementless stem designs exist with differing shape and areas of fixation. It is important to understand via pre-operative templating which stem works best in what situation. Procedural Related Factors. There has been a resurgence in interest in the varying surgical approaches to THA. While the validity and benefits of each surgical approach remains a point of debate, each approach carries with it its own set of risks. Several studies have demonstrated increased risk of periprosthetic fractures during THA with the use of the direct anterior approach. Risk factors for increased risk of periprosthetic fracture may include obesity, bone quality and stem design. Implant Related Factors. As mentioned there are several varying cementless implant shapes and sizes that can be utilised. There is no question that cementless fixation remains the most common mode of fixation in THA. However, one must not forget the role of cemented fixation in THA. Published results on long term fixation with cemented stems are comparable if not exceeding those of press fit fixation. In addition, the literature is clear that cemented fixation in the elderly hip fracture patient population is associated with a lower risk of periprosthetic fracture and lower risk of revision. The indication and principles of cemented stem fixation in THA should not be forgotten