Purpose. Degenerative changes of the lumbar motion segment often lead to stenosis of the spinal canal or neuroforamen. Axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) is intended to indirectly increase and stabilize foraminal dimensions by restoring disc height in patients with degenerative disc disease, thereby relieving axial and radicular pain. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of AxiaLIF on anterior disc height, posterior disc height, foraminal height and foraminal width as well as to determine the effectiveness of this minimally-invasive technique for indirect decompression and restoration of disc height. Method. Eighty-one patients who underwent a 360 degree lumbar interbody fusion at L4-S1 and L5-S1 with AxiaLIF between November 2008 and May 2010 and satisfied all inclusion criteria were included. The preoperative and three-month postoperative digital radiographs were reviewed and analyzed. Disc heights were measured in the planes of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the adjacent vertebral bodies. Foraminal height was measured as the maximum distance between the inferior margin of the pedicle of the superior vertebra and the superior margin of the pedicle of the inferior vertebra. Foraminal width was measured as the shortest distance between the edge of the superior facet of the caudal vertebra and the posterior edge of inferior endplate of the cranial vertebra. Potential magnification error between pre- and post-operative radiographs was corrected using the anterior vertebral height of L5 vertebra. Results. Our study shows that there is a mean increase of 42.0% in posterior disc height (PDH) at L4-5 and 21.5% in anterior disc height (ADH) at L4-5 and PDH mean increase of 33.6% and 16.3% in ADH at L5-S1 in two-level AxiaLIF cases. Similarly the mean change in foraminal height (FH) was 12.6% at L4-5 and 10.8% at L5-S1 in 2-levels AxiaLIF. The mean change in foraminal width (FW) at L4-L5 was 19.9% and 29.1% at L5-S1 in 2-levels AxiaLIF. In the single level AxiaLIF group, the mean change in PDH was 43.1%, the ADH change was 17.5%, the average change in FH was 14.4%, and mean change in FW was 25.3%. The change is reflected as a percentage of the preoperative value. All changes from preoperative to postoperative values were statistically significant. Conclusion. AxiaLIF appears to be an effective minimally invasive device to increase disc height and neuroforaminal area. Our findings appear equivalent to anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in terms of indirect decompression and increase in disc height. This, in combination with the added benefit of preserving the annulus, anterior longitudinal ligament, and posterior longitudinal ligament, suggests the AxiaLIF is an excellent alternative for this patient population. However, additional follow-up studies are necessary to confirm the long-term ability of the implant to maintain fusion and preserve the improvements in disc and foraminal area

PEEK rods construct has been proposed to allow better load sharing among spinal components when compared to the more traditional Titanium rods constructs. However, such proposal has largely derived from single-load in-vitro testing and the biomechanical differences between the two constructs when subjected to fatigue loading remain unknown. Current study comparatively analyzed the in-vitro biomechanical performance of PEEK and Titanium rod constructs as spinal implants through a 5 hour fatigue loading test. The disc height and intradiscal pressure of the instrumented and adjacent levels pre- and post-loading were recorded for analysis. The stress levels on the rods and bone stress near the screw-bone interface were also collected to investigate the likely failure rates of the two constructs. The results showed that the Titanium rods construct demonstrated a minimum amount of loss of disc height and intradiscal pressure at the instrumented level, however, a significant loss of the disc height and intradiscal pressure at adjacent levels compared to the intact spine were identified. In contrast, the disc height and intradiscal pressure of the PEEK rods were found to be comparable to those of the intact spine for all levels. The PEEK rods group also showed significantly less bone stress near the screw-bone interface compared to the Titanium rods group. Current study has demonstrated the potential benefits of the PEEK rods construct in reducing the risks of adjacent segment disease and implant failure rates when compared to the more traditional Titanium rods construct

Low back pain is the single most common cause for disability in individuals aged 45 years or younger, it carries tremendous weight in socioeconomic considerations. Degenerative aging of the structural components of the spine can be associated with genetic aspects, lifetime of tissue exposure to mechanical stress & loads and environmental factors. Mechanical consequences of the disc degenerative include loss of disc height, segment instability and increase the load on facets joints. All these can lead to degenerative changes and osteophytes that can narrow the spinal canal. Surgery is indicated in patients with spinal stenosis who have intractable pain, altered quality of life, substantially diminished functional capacity, failed non-surgical treatment and are not candidates for non-surgical treatment. The aim was to determine the reasons for refusal of surgery in patients with established degenerative lumber spine pathology eligible for surgery. All patients meeting the study criteria, patients older than 18 years, patients with both clinical and radiological established symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine pathology and patients eligible for surgery but refusing it were recruited. Questionnaire used to investigate reasons why they are refusing surgery. Results 59 were recruited, fifty-one (86.4 %) females and eight (13.6 %) males. Twenty (33.8 %) were between the age of 51 and 60 years, followed by nineteen (32.2 %) between 61 and 70 years, and fourteen (23.7 %) between 71 and 80 years. 43 (72 %) patients had lumber spondylosis complicated by lumber spine stenosis, followed by nine (15.2 %) with lumbar spine spondylolisthesis and four (6.7 %) had adjacent level disease. 28 (47.4 %) were scared of surgery, fifteen (25.4 %) claimed that they are too old for surgery and nine (15.2 %) were not ready. Findings from this study outlined that patients lack information about the spinal surgery. Patients education about spine surgery is needed

Purpose. To evaluate Radiological changes in the lumbosacral spine after insertion of Wallis Ligament for Foraminal Stenosis. Methods and Results. Thirty two Levels in Twenty Six patients were followed up with standardised radiographs after insertion of Wallis Ligaments for Foraminal Stenosis. Wallis ligaments as a top-off or those with prolapsed discs were not included. The Radiological parameters compared were Anterior and Posterior Disc height, Foraminal height and width, The inter-vertebral angle (IVA), Lumbar lordosis and Scoliosis if any. The presence of slips and their progression post-op was noted, as was bony lysis if any. There were ten males with thirteen levels and sixteen females with nineteen levels in the study. Eighteen levels (56.25%) were L4/L5, ten (31.25%) were L5/S1 and 4 (12.5%)were L3/L4. The average age in the series was 59.6 years (Range 37 – 89 yrs). Average follow up was 9.5 months (Range 2 to 36). The Average increase in Anterior disc height was 1.89 mm (+/−1.39), the posterior disc height increased by an average 1.09 mm (+/−1.14). Foraminal height increased by an average 3.85 mm (+/− 2.72), while foraminal width increased by 2.14 mm (+/− 1.38). The IVA increased in 16 and reduced in 15 patients, with no change in 1. Lumbar Lordosis increased in 23 patients, with an average value of 2.3°. No patient exhibited progression in scoliosis and no lysis could be identified. There were three Grade I slips pre-op; none progressed. Conclusion. Foraminal dimensions and Disc height were consistently improved after Wallis insertion. Changes in IVA and Lumbar lordosis were however variable. A longer follow up is suggested to look for sustained improvement and the presence of lysis. Ethics approval- None, Audit/service standard in trust. Interest statement - None

INTRODUCTION. Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is an alternative treatment to avoid fusion related adverse events, specifically adjacent segment disease. New generation of elastomeric non-articulating devices have been developed to more effectively replicate the shock absorption and flexural stiffness of native disc. This study reports 5 years clinical and radiographic outcomes, range of motion and position of the center of rotation after a viscoelastic TDR. Material and methods. This prospective observational cohort study included 61 consecutive patients with monosegmental TDR. We selected patients with intermediate functional activity according to Baecke score. Hybrid constructs had been excluded. Only cases with complete clinical and radiological follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months were included. Mean age at the time of surgery was 42.8 +7.7 years-old (27–60) and mean BMI was 24.2 kg/m² +3.4 (18–33). TDR level was L5-S1 in 39 cases and L4-L5 in 22 cases. The clinical evaluation was based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, Short Form-36 (SF36) including physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) and General Health Questionnaire GHQ28. The radiological outcomes were range of motion and position of the center of rotation at the index and the adjacent levels and the adjacent disc height changes. Results. There was a significant improvement in VAS (3.3±2.5 versus 6.6±1.7, p<0.001), in ODI (20±17.9 versus 51.2±14.6, p<0.001), GHQ28 (52.6±15.5 versus 64.2±15.6, p<0.001), SF 36 PCS (58.8±4.8 versus 32.4±3.4, p<0.001) and SF 36 MCS(60.7±6 versus 42.3±3.4, p<0.001). Additional surgeries were performed in 5 cases. 3 additional procedures were initially planified in the surgical program: one adjacent L3-L5 ligamentoplasty above a L5S1 TDR and two L5S1 TDR cases had additional laminectomies. Fusion at the index level was secondary performed in 2 L4L5 TDR cases but the secondary posterior fusion did not bring improvement. In the 56 remaining patients none experienced facet joint pain. One patient with sacroiliac pain needed local injections. Radiological outcomes were studied on 56 cases (exclusion of 5 cases with additional surgeries). The mean location centers of the index level and adjacent discs were comparable to those previously published in asymptomatic patients. According to the definition of Ziegler, all of our cases remained grade 0 for disc height (within 25% of normal). Discussion. The silent block design of LP-ESP provides an interesting specificity. It could be the key factor that makes the difference regarding facets problems and instability reported with other implants experimentally or clinically. Unfortunately no other comparative TDR series are available yet in the literature. Conclusion. This series reports significant improvement in mid-term follow up after TDR which is consistent with previously published studies but with a lower rate of revision surgery and no adjacent level disease pathologies. The radiographic assessment of the patients demonstrated the quality of functional reconstruction of the lumbar spine after LP ESP viscoelastic disc replacement

Introduction. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is considered a standard surgical treatment to degenerative discogenic diseases. Lately, the question arises whether or not ACDF significantly influences the progression of adjacent disc degeneration (ADD). The etiology of ADD is obscure and it has not been fully understood whether ADD is a consequence of fusion or it represents the aging pathway of the degenerative cervical process, thus making it a controversial topic [1-3]. There have been several discussions about the possibility of ACDF altering biomechanical conditions at adjacent segments, therefore resulting in increased load and excessive motion [3,4]. The purpose of this study was to compare the cervical segmental motion pre- and post-ACDF using novel 3D analytical techniques. Methods. Nine patients (2F/7M, mean age: 54.1 years, range 36–76 y.o.) underwent ACDF due to symptomatic cervical degenerative discogenic disease. One-level ACDF was performed in 4 patients, whereas 2-level ACDF was done in five, using cylindrical titanium porous cage implants. Pre- and post (postoperative periods ranged from 11-months, 25 days to 12-months, 22 days, mean postoperative period: 12.09 months) surgery, dynamic-CT examinations were conducted in neutral, flexion and extension positions. Subject-based 3D CT models were created for segmental motion analysis (Fig. 1). Six-degrees-of-freedom 3D segmental movements were analyzed using a validated Volume-Merge methods (accuracy: 0.1 mm in translation, 0.2°in rotation) [5]. The segmental translation was evaluated by the segmental translations of gravity centers of endplates (Fig. 2). Disc-height distribution was measured using a custom-written Visual C++ routine implementing a lease-distance calculation algorithm. The mean translation distance was calculated for the each adjacent level (Fig. 2). Differences of segmental motions and mean disc height between pre- and post-surgery at each level were compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results were presented mean±SEM. Results. Regarding the fusion level, the data shows decreases in both the flexion/extension (F/E) angular range of motion (ROM) (7.46±1.17°preoperatively vs. 3.14±0.56°post-operatively, p<0.003) and the segmental translation in the anterior/posterior direction (AP translation) after surgery (1.22±0.20 mm pre-operatively and 0.32±0.11 mm post-operatively, p<0.01). For the adjacent levels category (inferior and superior combined), the E/F angular ROM was larger after surgery (6.74±1.22°pre-operatively vs. 8.48±0.56°post-operatively, p<0.03). The lateral and axial rotational angular ranges of motion pre- and post-surgery did not show any statistically differences at the adjacent levels. The AP translation at the adjacent levels did not change after surgery (1.22±0.26 mm pre-operatively and 1.45±0.29 mm post-operatively). Translations in lateral and cranio-caudal directions also did not show change following surgery. The mean disc height in the adjacent level (2.39±0.14 mm) showed no differences with respect to the post-surgical measurements (2.40±0.19 mm). Conclusions. The use of a high-accuracy in vivo 3D kinematic analysis method enabled the detection of subtle changes in segmental movement between pre- and post-ACDF conditions. The result of the current study showed increased segmental movements in F/E angles at the adjacent level. These results are consistent with the some previous studies in the literature [4,6-11]. The magnitude of the increased movement, however, was only 1.74°from full-full-flexion to full-extension and no increase was found in AP translation. No disc height loss associated with disc degeneration was observed during a 1-year period after ACDF. Longer follow-up studies with larger patient cohorts will be required to investigate whether the increased F/E angle at the adjacent level effectively causes symptomatic ADD

Nowadays many new minimally invasive techniques are experienced to perform lower lumbar interbody fusion in attempt to decrease the complications related to open anterior approach. AxiaLIF (axial lumbar interbody fusion) system is a percutaneous transacral approach that exploits the virtual presacral retroperitoneal space to perform annulus-sparing discectomy and interbody instrumented fusion of lower lumbar disc spaces. Additioning posterior percutaneous instrumentation, a robust axial construct is placed which restores disc height, sagittal balance and lordosis with minimal muscle dissection, blood loss and postoperative pain. Via fluoroscopically-guided approach, AxiaLIF procedure creates a presacral retroperitoneal corridor in the midline through a paracoccigeal skin incision of 2-3 cm. This space is void of neuro-vascular major elements. A safe working cannula is put in and docked in the S1-S1 entry level and a transacral channel is realized gaining the central space of the disc. A 360° annulus-sparing radial discectomy is performed with special cutters even in case of collapsed disc space and the bone graft is inserted. The following screwing of AxiaLIF rod restores disc height via distraction if necessary, decompresses the neural foramen indirectly and undertakes instantaneous rigid fixation of adjacent vertebral bodies. Using the same incision point and trajectory through the presacral space as AxiaLIF, it is possible to realized a similar procedure L4-S1 vertebral fusions called AxiaLIF 2L. Between february 2009 and may 2010 25 patients (16F:9M) affected by degenerative disc disease (17) and grade 1 or 2 spondylolisthesis (8) were included in this study. Evaluated outcomes were the amount of bleeding, the presence of presacral hematoma, the functional recovery time, the surgery time rate, the x-ray time rate, the complication rate (infection, pelvic visceral injury, postoperative pain). 21 of 25 patients underwent AxiaLIF L5-S1 procedures, 4 of these with a stand alone implant and 17 followed by posterior instrumentation. In the remaining 4 patients, a AxiaLIF 2L L4-S1 procedures is performed. 4 of 25 patients had a perioperative suction drenage. Mean operative time for L5-S1 AxiaLIF procedure was 49 minutes. A 2. nd. p.o.d. CT pelvic scan of undrained and drained groups showed a mean presacral hematoma of 45 cc and 17 cc respectively reduced one month later to a mean value of 19 cc and 3 cc. Hemoglobin rate mainly reduced of 1,7 g/dL between pre and postoperative time. At one month all patients improved their quality of life significantly but one had a gluteal pain. No patient had perioperative infections or pelvic visceral injuries or required blood transfusions. This study seems to assess that AxiaLIF procedure is a minimally invasive lower spine techique actually. The presacral hematoma presence seems to have no side effect and it may be prevented by perioperative drainage. More large studies are needed to confirm our results

INTRODUCTION. Standing spinal alignment has been the center of focus recently, particularly in the setting of adult spinal deformity. Humans spend approximately half of their waking life in a seated position. While lumbopelvic sagittal alignment has been shown to adapt from standing to sitting posture, segmental vertebral alignment of the entire spine is not yet fully understood, nor are the effects of DEGEN or DEFORMITY. Segmental spinal alignment between sitting and standing, and the effects of degeneration and deformity were analyzed. METHODS. Segmental spinal alignment and lumbopelvic alignment (pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, sacral slope) were analyzed. Lumbar spines were classified as NORMAL, DEGEN (at least one level of disc height loss >50%, facet arthropathy, or spondylolisthesis), or DEFORMITY (PI-LL mismatch>10°). Exclusion criteria included lumbar fusion/ankylosis, hip arthroplasty, and transitional lumbosacral anatomy. Independent samples t-tests analyzed lumbopelvic and segmental alignment between sitting and standing within groups. ANOVA assessed these differences between spine pathology groups. RESULTS. There were 183 NORMAL, 216 DEGEN and 92 DEFORMITY patients with significant differences in age, gender, and hip OA grades. After propensity matching for these factors, there were 56 patients in each group (age 63±14, 58% female) [Fig. 1]. Significant differences were noted between spinal pathology groups with regard to changes from standing to sitting alignment with regard to NORMAL vs DEGEN vs DEFORMITY groups in PT (13.93° vs −11.98° vs − 7.95°; p=0.024), LL (21.91° vs 17.45° vs 13.23°; p=0.002), PI-LL (−22.32° vs −17.28° vs −13.18°; p<0.001), SVA (−48.99° vs −29.98° vs −32.12°; p=0.002), and TPA(−16.35° vs −12.69° vs −9.64; p=0.001). TK (−2.08° vs −2.78° vs −2.00°, p=0.943) and CL (−3.84° vs −4.14° vs −3.57°, p=0.621) were not significantly different across spinal pathology groups [Fig. 2]. NORMAL patients had overall greater mobility in the lower lumbar spine from standing to sitting compared to DEGEN and DEFORMITY patients. L4-L5 (7.50° vs 5.23° vs 4.74°, p=0.012) and L5-S1 (6.96° vs 5.28° and 3.69°, p=0.027). There were no significant differences in change in alignment from standing to sitting at the upper lumbar levels or lower thoracic levels between the three groups [Fig. 3]. CONCLUSION. The lower lumbar spine provides the greatest sitting to standing change in lumbopelvic alignment in normal patients. Degeneration and deformity of the spine significantly reduces the mobility of the lower lumbar spine and PT. With lumbar spine degeneration and flatback deformity, relatively more alignment change occurs at the upper lumbar spine and thoracolumbar junction

Introduction. Total disc replacement (TDR) provides an alternative to fusion that is designed to preserve motion at the treated level and restore disc height. The effects of TDR on spine biomechanics at the treated and adjacent levels are not fully understood. Thus, the present study investigated facet changes in contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, peak force, and contact area at the facet joints after TDR. Methods. Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric lumbar spines were potted at T12 and L5 and installed in a 6-DOF displacement-controlled testing system. Displacements of 15° flexion/extension, 10° right/left bending, and 10° right/left axial rotation were applied. Contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, peak force and contact area for each facet joint were recorded at L2-L3 and L3-L4 before and after TDR at L3-L4 (ProDisc-L, Synthes Spine). The data were analysed with ANOVAs/t-tests. Results. Axial rotation had the most impact on contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, peak force, and contact area in intact spines. During lateral bending and axial rotation, TDR resulted in a significant increase in facet forces at the level of treatment and a decrease in contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and peak force at the level superior to the TDR. With flexion/extension, there was a decrease in peak contact pressure and peak contact force at the superior level. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that rotation is the most demanding motion for the spine. We also found an increase in facet forces at the treated level after TDR. To our knowledge, we are the first to show a decrease in several biomechanical parameters after TDR at the adjacent superior level in a cadaveric model. In general, our findings suggest there is an increase in loading of the facet joints at the level of disc implantation and an overall unloading effect at the level above

Background. Synthetic interbody spinal fusion devices are used to restore and maintain disc height and ensure proper vertebral alignment. These devices are often filled with autograft bone to facilitate bone bridging through the device while providing mechanical stability. Nonporous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) devices are widely used clinically for such procedures. 1. Trabecular Metal devices are an alternative, fabricated from porous tantalum. It was hypothesized that the porous Trabecular Metal device would better maintain autograft viability through the center of the device, the ‘graft hole’ (GH). Methods. Twenty-five goats underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a Trabecular Metal or PEEK device for 6, 12 or 26 weeks. The GH of each device was filled with autograft bone morsels harvested from the animal at implantation. Fluorochrome labeling oxytetracycline was administered to the animals and used to determine bone viability in the device regions. Following necropsy, the vertebral segments were embedded in poly(methyl methacrylate) sectioned and analyzed using fluorescence and backscatter electron (BSE) imaging. The percent of bone tissue present within the GH was measured as a volume percent using BSE images (Fig. 1). Results. Bone percent analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference (p<0.05) in volume of bone tissue within the GH of the two devices at 6 and 26 weeks (Fig. 2). At 12 weeks the animals implanted with the Trabecular Metal device had significantly greater volumes of bone within the GH region. Viable bone was observed in the host bone region and periprosthetic to the implant of all PEEK (n=12) and Trabecular Metal (n=12) animals within the study, determined by the presence of fluorescent labels (Fig. 3). Viable bone was also observed in the GH region of all animals with a Trabecular Metal device. However, only 5 of 12 PEEK animals showed bone viability within the GH (2 at 12 weeks and 3 at 26 weeks). A Fisher's exact comparison of the number of animals with viable bone in the GH showed a significant difference between the two devices, p<0.05. Conclusion. Autograft viability was better maintained within the GH for the porous Trabecular Metal device compared to the PEEK device. Although the amount of bone tissue within the GH of the PEEK devices was determined to have no significant difference compared to the Trabecular Metal devices at 6 and 26 weeks, the GH bone tissue was not viable in a number of the PEEK animals at each time point. The interconnected network and high volume porosity of the Trabecular Metal device may have allowed for fluid exchange, angiogenesis and increased blood supply to the autograft morsels. The viability of the autograft morsels also played an important role in the success of bone bridging through the GH between the vertebral endplates. In this animal model it was demonstrated that the autograft bone placed within the PEEK spinal fusion device did not always remain viable after implantation, but sometimes only filled the GH and did not necessarily facilitate fusion between the vertebrae as intended