Background. Spinal deformity has a known deleterious effect upon the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty and acetabular component positioning. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between severity of spinal deformity parameters and acetabular cup position, rate of dislocation, and rate of revision among patients with total hip arthroplasties and concomitant spinal deformity. Methods. A prospectively collected database of patients with spinal deformity was reviewed and patients with total hip arthroplasty were identified. The full body standing stereoradiographic images (EOS) were reviewed for each patient. From these images, spinal deformity parameters and acetabular cup anteversion and inclination were measured. A chart review was performed on all patients to determine dislocation and revision arthroplasty events. Statistical analysis was performed to determine correlation of deformity with acetabular cup position. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with spinal fusion, dislocation events, and revision THA. Results. One-hundred and seven spinal deformity patients were identified, with 139 hips for analysis. The rate of THA dislocation in this cohort was 8.0%, with a revision rate of 5.8% for instability. Patients who sustained dislocations had significantly higher spinopelvic tilt, T1-pelvic angle, and mismatch of lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence. Among all patients, only 68.8% met the radiographic “safe zone” for anteversion in the standing position (Figure 1). A comparison of radiographic cup position on supine x-ray with standing EOS imaging demonstrated an increase in anteversion of 6.2 degrees. Standing decreased rate of safe zone anteversion of the cup by 20%. Conclusions. In this cohort, patients with THA and concomitant spinal deformity have a particularly high rate of dislocation. This dislocation risk may be driven by the degree of spinal deformity and by spinopelvic compensation, which is suggested by our findings. Arthroplasty surgeons should be aware of the elevated dislocation rate and consider a surgical strategy for maintaining hip stability in this population

Preoperative talar valgus deformity increases the technical difficulty of total ankle replacement (TAR) and is associated with an increased failure rate. Deformity of ≥15° has been reported to be a contraindication to arthroplasty. The goal of the present study was to determine whether the operative procedures and clinical outcomes of TAR for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis were comparable for patients with preoperative talar valgus deformity of ≥15° as compared to those with <15°. We will describe the evolving surgical technique being utilized to tackle these challenging cases. Fifty ankles with preoperative coronal-plane tibiotalar valgus deformity of ≥15° “valgus” group) and 50 ankles with valgus deformity of <15° (“control” group) underwent TAR. The cohorts were similar with respect to demographics and components used. All TARs were performed by a single surgeon. The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 5.5 years (minimum two years). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements of coronal-plane deformity, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) scores and Short Form (SF)-36 scores were prospectively recorded. All ancillary (intraoperative) and secondary procedures, complications and measurements were collected. The AOS pain and disability subscale scores decreased significantly in both groups. The improvement in AOS and SF-36 scores did not differ significantly between the groups at the time of the final follow-up. The valgus group underwent more ancillary procedures during the index surgery (80% vs 26%). Tibio-talar deformity improved significantly toward a normal weight-bearing axis in the valgus group. Secondary postoperative procedures were more common in the valgus group (36%) than the controls (20%). Overall, re-operation was not associated with poorer patient outcome scores. Metal component revision surgery occurred in seven patients (three valgus and four controls). These revisions included two deep infections (2%), one in each group, which were converted to hindfoot fusions. Therefore, 94% of the valgus group retained their original components at final follow-up. Thus far, this is the largest reported study that specifically evaluates TAR with significant preoperative valgus alignment, in addition to having the longest follow-up. Satisfactory midterm results were achieved in patients with valgus mal-alignment of ≥15°. The valgus cohort required more procedures during and after their TAR, as well as receiving more novel techniques to balance their TAR. Whilst longer term studies are needed, valgus coronal-plane alignment of ≥15° should not be considered an absolute contraindication to TAR if the associated deformities are addressed

Introduction. Charcot neuroarthropathy is a limb threatening condition and the optimal surgical strategy for limb salvage in gross foot deformity remains unclear. We present our experience of using fine wire frames to correct severe midfoot deformity, followed by internal beaming to maintain the correction. Materials and Methods. Nine patients underwent this treatment between 2020–2023. Initial deformity correction by Ilizarov or hexapod butt frame was followed by internal beaming with a mean follow up of 11 months. A retrospective analysis of radiographs and electronic records was performed. Meary's angle, calcaneal pitch, cuboid height, hindfoot midfoot angle and AP Meary's angle were compared throughout treatment. Complications, length of stay and the number of operations are also described. Results. Mean age was 53 years (range:40–59). Mean frame duration was 3.3 months before conversion to beaming. Prior frame-assisted deformity correction resulted in consistently improved radiological parameters. Varying degrees of subsequent collapse were universal, but 5 patients still regained mobility and a stable, plantargrade, ulcer-free foot. Complications were common, including hardware migration (N=6,66%), breakage (N=2,22%), loosening (N=3,33%), infection (N=4,44%), 1 amputation and an unscheduled reoperation rate of 55%. Mean cumulative length of stay was 42 days. Conclusions. Aggressive deformity correction and internal fixation for Charcot arthropathy requires strategic and individualised care plans. Complications are expected for each patient. Patients must understand this is a limb salvage scenario. This management strategy is resource heavy and requires timely interventions at each stage with a well-structured MDT delivering care. The departmental learning points are to be discussed

Constrained implants with intra-medullary fixation are expedient for complex TKA. Constraint is associated with loosening, but can correction of deformity mitigate risk of loosening?. Primary TKA's with a non-linked constrained prosthesis from 2010-2018 were identified. Indications were ligamentous instability or intra-medullary fixation to bypass stress risers. All included fully cemented 30mm stem extensions on tibia and femur. If soft tissue stability was achieved, a posterior stabilized (PS) tibial insert was selected. Pre and post TKA full length radiographs showed. i. hip-knee-ankle angles (HKAA). ii. Kennedy Zone (KZ) where hip to ankle vector crosses knee joint. 77 TKA's in 68 patients, average age 69.3 years (41-89.5) with OA (65%) post-trauma (24.5%) and inflammatory arthropathy (10.5%). Pre-op radiographs (62 knees) showed varus in 37.0%. (HKAA: 4. o. -29. o. ), valgus in 59.6% (HKAA range 8. o. -41. o. ) and 2 knees in neutral. 13 cases deceased within 2 years were excluded. Six with 2 year follow up pending have not been revised. Mean follow-up is 6.1 yrs (2.4-11.9yrs). Long post-op radiographs showed 34 (57.6%) in central KZ (HKKA 180. o. +/- 2. o. ). . Thirteen (22.0%) were in mechanical varus (HKAA 3. o. -15. o. ) and 12 (20.3%) in mechanical valgus: HKAA (171. o. -178. o. ). Three failed with infection; 2 after ORIF and one with BMI>50. The greatest post op varus suffered peri-prosthetic fracture. There was no aseptic loosening or instability. Only full-length radiographs accurately measure alignment and very few similar studies exist. No cases failed by loosening or instability, but PPF followed persistent malalignment. Infection complicated prior ORIF and elevated BMI. This does not endorse indiscriminate use of mechanically constrained knee prostheses. Lower demand patients with complex arthropathy, especially severe deformity, benefit from fully cemented, non-linked constrained prostheses, with intra-medullary fixation. Hinges are not necessarily indicated, and rotational constraint does not lead to loosening

Aims. The timing of when to remove a circular frame is crucial; early removal results in refracture or deformity, while late removal increases the patient morbidity and delay in return to work. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of a staged reloading protocol. We report the incidence of mechanical failure following both single-stage and two stage reloading protocols and analyze the associated risk factors. Methods. We identified consecutive patients from our departmental database. Both trauma and elective cases were included, of all ages, frame types, and pathologies who underwent circular frame treatment. Our protocol is either a single-stage or two-stage process implemented by defunctioning the frame, in order to progressively increase the weightbearing load through the bone, and promote full loading prior to frame removal. Before progression, through the process we monitor patients for any increase in pain and assess radiographs for deformity or refracture. Results. There were 244 frames (230 patients) included in the analyses, of which 90 were Ilizarov type frames and 154 were hexapods. There were 149 frames which underwent single-stage reloading and 95 frames which underwent a two-stage reloading protocol. Mechanical failure occurred after frame removal in 13 frames (5%), which suffered refracture. There were no cases of change in alignment. There was no difference between refracture patients who underwent single-stage or two-stage reloading protocols (p = 0.772). In all, 14 patients had failure prevented through identification with the reloading protocol. Conclusion. Our reloading protocol is a simple and effective way to confirm the timing of frame removal and minimize the rate of mechanical failure. Similar failure rates occurred between patients undergoing single-stage and two-stage reloading protocols. If the surgeon is confident with clinical and radiological assessment, it may be possible to progress directly to stage two and decrease frame time and patient morbidity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(5):359–366

Children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) frequently present with coxa vara (CV). Skeletal fragility, severe deformity and limited fixation options make this a challenging condition to correct surgically. Our study aimed to determine the efficacy of the Fassier technique to correct CV and determine the complication rate. Retrospective, descriptive case series from a tertiary hospital. We retrospectively reviewed records of a cohort of eight children (four females, 12 hips) with OI (6/8 Sillence type III, 2/8 type IV) who had surgical treatment with Fassier technique for CV between 2014 and 2020. Inclusion Criteria: All patients with CV secondary to OI treated surgically with Fassier technique. Exclusion Criteria: Patients older than 18 years; Patients with CV treated non-operatively or by surgical technique different to Fassier technique. Data relating to the following parameters was collected and analyzed: demographic data, pre- and postoperative neck shaft angle (NSA), complications and NSA at final follow-up. The mean age at operation was 5.8 years (range 2–10). The mean NSA was corrected from 96.8° preoperatively to 137º postoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 38.6 months, the mean NSA was maintained at 133°, and 83% (10/12) of hips had an NSA that remained greater than 120°. There was a 42% (5/12) complication rate: three Fassier–Duval rods failed to expand after distal epiphyseal fixation was lost during growth; one Rush rod migrated through the lateral proximal femur cortex with recurrent coxa vara; and one Rush rod migrated proximally and required rod revision. The Fassier technique effectively corrected CV in children with moderate and progressively deforming OI. The deformity correction was maintained in the short term. The complication rate was high, but mainly related to the failed expansion of the Fassier–Duval rods

Aims. To assess if older symptomatic children with club foot deformity differ in perceived disability and foot function during gait, depending on initial treatment with Ponseti or surgery, compared to a control group. Second aim was to investigate correlations between foot function during gait and perceived disability in this population. Methods. In all, 73 children with idiopathic club foot were included: 31 children treated with the Ponseti method (mean age 8.3 years; 24 male; 20 bilaterally affected, 13 left and 18 right sides analyzed), and 42 treated with primary surgical correction (mean age 11.6 years; 28 male; 23 bilaterally affected, 18 left and 24 right sides analyzed). Foot function data was collected during walking gait and included Oxford Foot Model kinematics (Foot Profile Score and the range of movement and average position of each part of the foot) and plantar pressure (peak pressure in five areas of the foot). Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire, Disease Specific Index for club foot, Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 were also collected. The gait data were compared between the two club foot groups and compared to control data. The gait data were also correlated with the data extracted from the questionnaires. Results. Our findings suggest that symptomatic children with club foot deformity present with similar degrees of gait deviations and perceived disability regardless of whether they had previously been treated with the Ponseti Method or surgery. The presence of sagittal and coronal plane hindfoot deformity and coronal plane forefoot deformity were associated with higher levels of perceived disability, regardless of their initial treatment. Conclusion. This is the first paper to compare outcomes between Ponseti and surgery in a symptomatic older club foot population seeking further treatment. It is also the first paper to correlate foot function during gait and perceived disability to establish a link between deformity and subjective outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:384–391

Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex foot deformity with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, forefoot varus, and collapse or hypermobility of the medial column. In its management, muscle and tendon balancing are important to address the deformity. Peroneus brevis is the primary evertor of the foot, and the strongest antagonist to the tibialis posterior. Moreover, peroneus longus is an important stabilizer of the medial column. To our knowledge, the role of peroneus brevis to peroneus longus tendon transfer in cases of PCFD has not been reported. This study evaluates patient reported outcomes including pain scores and any associated surgical complications for patients with PCFD undergoing isolated peroneus brevis to longus tendon transfer and gastrocnemius recession. Patients with symptomatic PCFD who had failed non-operative treatment, and underwent isolated soft tissue correction with peroneus brevis to longus tendon transfer and gastrocnemius recession were included. Procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a large University affiliated teaching hospital between January 1 2016 to March 31 2021. Patients younger than 18 years old, or undergoing surgical correction for PCFD which included osseous correction were excluded. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, procedures performed, and pre and post-operative patient related outcomes were collected via medical chart review and using the appropriate questionnaires. Outcomes assessed included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for foot and ankle pain as well as sinus tarsi pain (0-10), patient reported outcomes on EQ-5D, and documented complications. Statistical analysis was utilized to report change in VAS and EQ-5D outcomes using a paired t-test. Statistical significance was noted with p<0.05. We analysed 43 feet in 39 adults who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 55.4 ± 14.5 years old. The patient reported outcome mean results and statistical analysis are shown in Table one below. Mean pre and post-operative foot and ankle VAS pain was 6.73, and 3.13 respectively with a mean difference of 3.6 (p<0.001, 95% CI 2.6, 4.6). Mean pre and post-operative sinus tarsi VAS pain was 6.03 and 3.88, respectively with a mean difference of 2.1 (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.9, 3.4). Mean pre and post-operative EQ-5D Pain scores were 2.19 and 1.83 respectively with a mean difference of 0.4 (p=0.008, 95% CI 0.1, 0.6). Mean follow up time was 18.8 ± 18.4 months. Peroneus brevis to longus tendon transfer and gastrocnemius recession in the management of symptomatic progressive collapsing foot deformity significantly improved sinus tarsi and overall foot and ankle pain. Most EQ-5D scores improved, but did not reach statistically significant values with the exception of the pain score. This may have been limited by our cohort size. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature describing clinical results in the form of patient reported outcomes following treatment with this combination of isolated soft tissue procedures for the treatment of PCFD. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. We present the first 12 consecutive patients, undergoing elective paediatric limb reconstruction with an external fixator, for the 12-month period October 2020-October 2021. This is a single surgeon series for a newly appointed Consultant with limited previous experience. Arrangements were made for mentoring by a senior surgeon recently retired from the NHS but still active in private practice. Materials and Methods. The average age of patients was 10.5years at the time of frame application (5—15 years). Four frames in three patients were for Blount's; two for sequelae of NF1; two for posteromedial tibial bow with shortening, two for fibula hemimelia; one congenital short femur, one for sequelae of neonatal sepsis and one for bone loss following tumour resection. Results. We present early outcomes and complications for this challenging cohort. Two frames were revision frames, and a further two had had previous frame treatment. Where shortening was a primary component of the deformity (six cases) the mean lengthening required was 5cm (4–6cm). Conclusions. The benefits of this arrangement include enabling newly appointed Consultants to take on complex cases from the start of appointment, dealing with enormous waiting pressures and minimising complications. The BOA reported this year that 25% of the over 45 consultant workforce intend to retire within three years. In this context, a renewed focus is needed on succession planning, proleptic appointments, and novel schemes to retain experienced surgeons within complex NHS practice: we present a successful example of this strategy

Management of a knee with valgus deformities has always been considered a major challenge. Total knee arthroplasty requires not only correction of this deformity but also meticulous soft tissue balancing and achievement of a balanced rectangular gap. Bony deformities such as hypoplastic lateral condyle, tibial bone loss, and malaligned/malpositioned patella also need to be addressed. In addition, external rotation of the tibia and adaptive metaphyseal remodeling offers a challenge in obtaining the correct rotational alignment of the components. Various techniques for soft tissue balancing have been described in the literature and use of different implant options reported. These options include use of cruciate retaining, sacrificing, substituting and constrained implants. Purpose. This presentation describes options to correct a severe valgus deformity (severe being defined as a femorotibial angle of greater than 15 degrees) and their long term results. Methods. 34 women (50 knees) and 19 men (28 knees) aged 39 to 84 (mean 74) years with severe valgus knees underwent primary TKA by a senior surgeon. A valgus knee was defined as one having a preoperative valgus alignment greater than 15 degrees on a standing anteroposterior radiograph. The authors recommend a medial approach to correct the deformity, a minimal medial release and a distal femoral valgus resection of angle of 3 degrees. We recommend a sequential release of the lateral structures starting anteriorly from the attachment of ITB to the Gerdy's tubercle and going all the way back to the posterolaetral corner and capsule. Correctability of the deformity is checked sequentially after each release. After adequate posterolateral release, if the tibial tubercle could be rotated past the mid-coronal plate medially in both flexion and extension, it indicated appropriate soft tissue release and balance. Fine tuning in terms of final piecrusting of the ITB and or popliteus was carried out after using the trial components. Valgus secondary to an extra-articular deformity was treated using the criteria of Wen et al. In our study the majority of severe valgus knees (86%) could be treated by using unconstrained (CR, PS) knee options reserving the constrained knee / rotating hinge options only in cases of posterolateral instability secondary to an inadequate large release or in situations with very lax or incompetent MCL. Results. The average follow up was 10 years (range 8 to 14 years). The average HSS knee scores improved from 48 points preoperatively (range 32 to 68 points) to 91 points (range 78 to 95 points) postoperatively. The average postoperative range of motion measured with a goniometer was 110 degrees (range 80 to 135 degrees) which was a significant improvement over the preoperative levels (average 65 degrees). None of the patients were clinically unstable in the medioloateral or anteroposterior plane at the time of final follow up. The average preoperative valgus tibiofemoral alignment was 19.6 degrees (range 15 degrees to 45 degrees). Postoperatively the average tibio-femoral alignment was 5 degrees (range 2 degrees to 7 degrees) of valgus. No patient in the study was revised. Conclusion. Adequate lateral soft tissue release is the key to successful TKA in valgus knees. The choice of implant depends on the severity of the valgus deformity and the extent of soft tissue release needed to obtain a stable knee with balanced flexion and extension gaps. The most minimal constraint needed to achieve stability and balance was used in this study. In our experience the long term results of TKR on severe valgus deformities using minimal constrained knee have been good

Extra-articular deformity may be present in patients requiring TKA. Underlying causes include trauma, metabolic bone disease, congenital deformity, or prior osteotomy. Patients with intra-articular deformity have a combination of intra-articular bone loss and concomitant ligament contraction which can be managed in the standard fashion. In these cases establishing appropriate limb alignment and management of bone loss coincide well with the standard ligament balancing employed to provide a stable knee. However, if extra-articular deformity is not corrected extra-articularly, it must be corrected by a compensatory distal femoral or proximal tibial resection to reproduce appropriate limb alignment. Complex instabilities may result from this type of wedge resection because it occurs between the proximal and distal attachments of the collateral ligaments and so produces asymmetrical ligament length alterations. Femoral compensatory wedge resection for extra-articular deformity produces extension instability without affecting the flexion gap and so femoral deformities are POTENTIALLY more difficult to correct than tibial deformities where the compensatory tibial cut influences flexion AND extension equally. Lack of access to the intramedullary canal (as well as increased complexity of producing appropriately placed bone cuts) may be managed with computer guidance or patient specific instruments. The closer a deformity is to the knee, the greater its importance and the effect on the surgical correction. This is a directly proportional relationship, so that as the apex of the deformity moves from juxta-articular to more distant, the amount of corrective wedge needed to re-align the limb decreases proportionally. Rotatory deformities most commonly effect extensor mechanism tracking. The effect is similar to any other deformity in that proximity to the knee and increases the likelihood that it will have a significant local effect. In general, these deformities may be clinically, and radiographically more subtle and so must be searched for. They should be managed by restoring normal rotational parameters of the bone or by appropriate compensation of component rotation relative to the bone. As the need for prosthetic constraint increases due to ligament imbalance or deficiency, intramedullary stems may be required. Their use may be compromised by the presence of the deformity. The younger the patient and the more severe the deformity the more likely I am to treat the deformity by correction at the site of the deformity rather than compensating with abnormal bone resections. The older the patient and the milder the deformity (or the amount of correction required) the more intra-articular correction +/− increased TKA constraint is feasible

Management of the pathologic long-head biceps tendon remains controversial. Biceps tenotomy is a simple intervention but may result in visible deformity and subjective cramping. Comparatively, biceps tenodesis is technically challenging, and has increased operative times, and a more prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis, identify predictors for developing a deformity, and compare subjective and objective outcomes between those that have one and those that do not. Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial comparing tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. Patients 18 years of age or older with an arthroscopy confirmed biceps lesion were randomized to one of these two techniques. The primary outcome measure for this sub-study was the rate of a popeye deformity at 24-months post-operative as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Secondary outcomes were patient reported presence/absence of a popeye deformity, satisfaction with the appearance of their arm, as well as pain and cramping on a VAS. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa) was calculated between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of its occurrence. Linear regression was performed to identify if age, gender, or BMI were predictive of satisfaction in appearance if a deformity was present. Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to each group of which 42 in the tenodesis group and 45 in the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. The incidence of popeye deformity was 9.5% (4/42) in the tenodesis group and 33% (15/45) in the tenotomy group (18 male, 1 female) with a relative risk of 3.5 (p=0.016). There was strong interrater agreement between evaluator and patient perceived deformity (kappa=0.636; p<0.001). Gender tended towards being a significant predictor of having a popeye with males having 6.6 greater odds (p=0.090). BMI also tended towards significance with lower BMI predictive of popeye deformity (OR 1.21; p=0.051). Age was not predictive (p=0.191). Mean (SD) satisfaction score regarding the appearance of their popeye deformity was 7.3 (2.6). Age was a significant predictor, with lower age associated with decreased satisfaction (F=14.951, adjusted r2=0.582, p=0.004), but there was no association with gender (p=0.083) or BMI (p=0.949). There were no differences in pain, cramping, or strength between those who had a popeye deformity and those who did not. The risk of developing a popeye deformity was 3.5 times higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis. Male gender and lower BMI tended towards being predictive of having a deformity; however, those with a high BMI may have had popeye deformities that were not as visually apparent to an examiner as those with a lower BMI. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger patients with low BMI to mitigate the risk of an unsatisfactory popeye deformity

Extra-articular deformity may be present in patients requiring TKA. Underlying causes include trauma, metabolic bone disease, congenital deformity, or prior osteotomy. Patients with intra-articular deformity can have a combination of intra-articular bone loss and concomitant ligament contraction which can be managed in the standard fashion. In these cases establishing appropriate limb alignment and management of bone loss coincide well with the standard ligament balancing employed to provide a stable knee. However, if extra-articular deformity is not corrected extra-articularly, it must be corrected by a compensatory distal femoral or proximal tibial resection to reproduce appropriate limb alignment. Complex instabilities may result from this type of wedge resection because it occurs between the proximal and distal attachments of the collateral ligaments and so produces asymmetrical ligament length alterations. Femoral compensatory wedge resection for extra-articular deformity produces extension instability without affecting the flexion gap and so femoral deformities are POTENTIALLY more difficult to correct than tibial deformities where the compensatory tibial cut influences flexion AND extension equally. Lack of access to the intramedullary canal (as well as increased complexity of producing appropriately placed bone cuts) may be managed with computer guidance or patient specific instruments. The closer a deformity is to the knee, the greater its importance and the effect on the surgical correction. This is a directly proportional relationship, so that as the apex of the deformity moves from juxta-articular to more distant, the amount of corrective wedge needed to re-align the limb decreases proportionally. Rotatory deformities are complex and most commonly effect extensor mechanism tracking. In general the effect is similar to any other deformity in that proximity to the knee increases the likelihood that it will have a significant local effect. In general, these deformities are clinically, and radiographically more subtle and so must be searched for. They should be managed by an attempt to restore normal rotational parameters of the bone itself or appropriate compensation of component rotation in relation to the bone. As prosthetic constraint increases one may need to use intramedullary stems. Their use may be compromised by the deformity. Finally, the younger the patient and the more severe the deformity the more likely I am to treat the deformity by correction at the site of the deformity rather than compensating with abnormal bone resections. The older the patient and the milder the deformity (or the amount of wedge correction required) the more likely I am to manage the deformity with intra-articular correction and increased TKA constraint

Introduction. Management of deformity involving limb length discrepancy (LLD) using intramedullary devices offers significant benefits to both patients and clinicians over traditional external fixation. Following the withdrawal of the PRECICE nail, the Fitbone became the primary implant available for intramedullary lengthening and deformity correction within our service. This consecutive series illustrates the advantages and complications associated with the use of this device, and describes a novel technique modification for antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails. Materials & Methods. A retrospective cohort review was performed of patient outcomes after treatment with the Fitbone nail at two tertiary referral limb reconstruction services (one adult, one paediatric) between January 2021 to December 2023. Aetiology, indications, initial and final LLD, use of concomitant rail assisted deformity correction (ORDER), removal time and healing index were assessed. Complications of treatment were evaluated and described in detail, alongside technique modifications to reduce the rate of these complications. Results. 21 nails (18 femoral, 2 tibial, 1 humeral) were inserted in 6 adult and 13 paediatric patients. Post-traumatic and congenital/developmental LLD were the most common indications for surgery in the adult and paediatric cohorts respectively. ORDER was employed in 11 cases (9 femurs and 2 tibias). Treatment goals were achieved in all but one case. Complications included superficial infection, locking bolt migration, periprosthetic fracture and component failure. Seven patients required unplanned returns to theatre. Conclusions. The Fitbone nail is an established option for intramedullary limb lengthening, however its use in the UK has been relatively limited compared to the PRECICE until 2021. Our data helps to define its place for limb lengthening and complex deformity correction in both adult and paediatric patients, including in humeral lengthening and retrograde femoral insertion across an open physis. We have identified important potential risks and novel techniques to simplify surgery and avoid complications

Introduction. The most challenging aspect in rotational deformity correction is translating the pre-operative plan to an accurate intra-operative correction. Landmarks away from the osteotomy site are typically employed at pre-operative planning and this can render inadequate correction. Our proposed technique of pre-operative planning using CT scan and leg length radiographs can translate to accurate intra-operative correction. Materials and Methods. A circle was superimposed at osteotomy site with its centre serving as the centre of correction of rotation. Medio-lateral distance at osteotomy site measured and used as diameter of the circle. Circumference of the circle was calculated by multiplying diameter with Pi and used in the below formula to obtain accurate de-rotation distance;. Derotation distance = (Circumference/360) × correction value for desired ante-version. The exact site of osteotomy was measured in theatre under C-arm and exposed. Derotation distance was marked on the surface of bone as point A and point B with a flexible ruler. Osteotomy performed with saw and derotation was done till point A and point B were co-linear. Derotation distance obtained using this technique is specific for the site of chosen osteotomy and implies a specific degree of correction for every millimeter derotated. Distal femur was the chosen site of osteotomy if there was associated patellar instability and proximal femur if there was no patellar instability. Results. We have used the above technique to successfully correct rotational malalignment of femur and tibia in three patients thus far. The foot progression angle improved in all patients following surgery. One patient had post-operative CT scan of the hips which showed accurate reduction of ante-version. Conclusions. Our new technique of rotational deformity correction is simple and reproducible using commonly available tools as CT scan and leg length radiographs. This technique effectively translates the pre-operative plan to accurate intra-operative correction of rotational deformity

Limb deformity is common in patients presenting for knee arthroplasty, either related to asymmetrical wear patterns from the underlying arthritic process (intra-articular malalignment) or less often major extra-articular deformity due to prior fracture malunion, childhood physical injury, old osteotomy, or developmental or metabolic disorders such as Blount's disease or hypophosphatemic rickets. Angular deformity that is above the epicondyles or below the fibular neck may not be easily correctable by adjusted bone cuts as the amount of bone resection may make soft tissue balancing impossible or may disrupt completely the collateral ligament attachments. Development of a treatment plan begins with careful assessment of the malalignment which may be mainly coronal, sagittal, rotational or some combination. Translation can also complicate the reconstruction as this has effects directly on location of the mechanical axis. Most intra-articular deformities are due to the arthritic process alone, but may occasionally be the result of intra-articular fracture, periarticular osteotomy or from prior revision surgery effects. While intra-articular deformity can almost always be managed with adjusted bone cuts it is important to have available revision type implants to enhance fixation (stems) or increase constraint when ligament balancing or ligament laxity is a problem. Extra-articular deformities may be correctable with adjusted bone cuts and altered implant positioning when the deformity is smaller, or located a longer distance from the joint. The effect of a deformity is proportional to its distance from the joint. The closer the deformity is to the joint, the greater the impact the same degree angular deformity will have. In general deformities in the plane of knee are better tolerated than sagittal plane (varus/valgus) deformity. Careful pre-operative planning is required for cases with significant extra-articular deformity with a focus on location and plane of the apex of the deformity, identification of the mechanical axis location relative to the deformed limb, distance of the deformity from the joint, and determination of the intra-articular effect on bone cuts and implant position absent osteotomy. In the course of pre-operative planning, osteotomy is suggested when there is inability to correct the mechanical axis to neutral without excessive bone cuts which compromise ligament or patellar tendon attachment sites, or alternatively when adequate adjustment of cuts will likely lead to excessive joint line obliquity which can compromise ability to balance the soft tissues. When chosen, adjunctive osteotomy can be done in one-stage at the time of TKA or the procedures can be done separately in two stages. When simultaneous with TKA, osteotomy fixation options include long stems added to the femoral (or tibial) component for intramedullary fixation, adjunctive plate and screw fixation, and antegrade (usually locked) nailing for some femoral osteotomies. Choice of fixation method is often influenced by specific deformity size location, bone quality and amount, and surgeon preference. Surgical navigation, or intra-operative x-ray imaging methods (or both) have both been used to facilitate accurate correction of deformity in these complex cases. When faced with major deformity of the femur or tibia, with careful planning combined osteotomy and TKA can result in excellent outcomes and durable implant fixation with less constraint, less bone loss, and better joint kinematics than is possible with modified TKA alone

The goal is to avoid letting femoral deformity force suboptimal implant position/fixation. Suboptimal implant position has an adverse effect on hip biomechanics and often on hip function and durability. Classification - Practical approach to femoral deformities: categorise into 3 main groups: 1.) Very proximal, 2.) Subtrochanteric, 3.) Distal. Management of distal deformities: Most can be ignored if there is sufficient room to place conventional femoral implant. Management of proximal deformities: Option 1: Use implants that allow satisfactory positioning despite deformity…or… Option 2: Remove the deformity. Management of subtrochanteric level deformities: These are the most difficult. Problems: 1.) Too proximal to ignore, 2.) Too distal to bypass. Main treatment options: 1.) Resurfacing THA, 2.) Short stem THA, 3.) Corrective osteotomy with THA. Corrective osteotomy with THA: 1.) Perform osteotomy at level of deformity, 2.) In most cases a corrective osteotomy that creates a transverse osteotomy junction is simplest, 3.) Use an implant that provides reliable fixation in the femur (usually uncemented), 4.) Use implant that provides fixation of the proximal and distal fragments. Majority of proximal femoral deformities managed with one-stage procedure: 1.) Excise deformity and replace with metal, 2.) Implants that allow ignoring deformity, 3.) Corrective osteotomy

INTRODUCTION. Gross deformity such as severe flexion contraction or severe varus deformity in both knees is better corrected simultaneously to prevent recurrence of flexion contracture and also to have equal leg length which facilitate proper physiotherapy post operatively. However, there is great reluctance in many institute to perform Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement (SBTKR) fearing higher complication rate. The purpose of this paper is to show that SBTKR is economical, safe and sometimes is necessary in gross deformity such as bilateral flexion contracture. In this paper we will review the most recent literature about SBTKR which support our argument. Also we will review our cases of over 7500 of SBTKR done at our institution. In this study we will focus on the process that we went through at our institution to upgrade our medical care to enable to do this SBTKR safely. We will share also our post-operative protocol and some hint on the administrative level in order to perform SBTKR. METHODS. In the last 20 years we performed over 7500 SBTKR, 15,000 implants. We have established at our institution a pre-operative team where this team included internist, physiotherapist, anesthesiologist and other medical sub specialty as recommended by the internist. The patient was pre-oped carefully and the extent of medical examination was determined by the internist and the anesthesiologist. Each patient care was determined preoperatively and also we have utilized special complexity scale that we have developed at our institution to reflect the complexity of the primary total knee replacement 1–5. The ASA and complexity scale is now routinely printed on our OR schedule. If the patient was cleared, SBTKR were carried on. The surgery is done first for the right side and after cementing the assistant will start the left side while the senior surgeon will clean the knee and then assist in the second knee. We have tried different modalities and the safest, less confusing was to first finish the first knee and after cementing the other limb was started by the assistant. The surgeon had only two assistants and one scrub nurse. Increasing the no. of assistant will make things more confusing. So we strongly recommend having only one senior surgeon. Post-operative care was almost identical to that of a single total knee replacement. We documented the complication rate, blood transfusion and unexpected ICU admission etc. in the SBTKR and we compared it to over 1000 cases of single knee replacement done at our institution by the same surgeon. The knee score was also was documented on both sides. RESULTS. Blood transfusion as much higher in SBTKR and in spite of using many methods to decrease blood loss we continued to have transfusion rate of 52%. We have established a Task Force that usually meets every two weeks in order to improve the medical conditions. Infection rate was the same in the single and SBTKR. Of interest of the fact that the no. of unexpected ICU admission dropped significantly in the second year- which could be related more to the cooperation and collaboration between the medical team. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. SBTKR is safe as single knee replacement. It is needed in gross deformity and in non-ambulating patient. Getting the institution ready for such a procedure has to be organized through special Task Force and requires extensive collaboration among different part of the hospital dept. We strongly recommend doing SBTKR especially in patients who has a gross deformity and in non-ambulating patient

Introduction: The goal is to avoid letting femoral deformity force suboptimal implant position/fixation. Suboptimal implant position has an adverse effect on hip biomechanics and often on hip function and durability. Classification: Practical approach to femoral deformities: categorise into 3 main groups: Very proximal, Subtrochanteric, Distal. Management: Management of distal deformities: Most can be ignored if there is sufficient room to place conventional femoral implant. Management of proximal deformities: Option 1: Use implants that allow satisfactory positioning despite deformity…or… Option 2: Remove the deformity. Management of subtrochanteric level deformities: These are the most difficult. Problems: Too proximal to ignore, Too distal to bypass. Main treatment options: Resurfacing THA, Short stem THA, Corrective osteotomy with THA. Corrective osteotomy with THA: Perform osteotomy at level of deformity, In most cases a corrective osteotomy that creates a transverse osteotomy junction is simplest, Use an implant that provides reliable fixation in the femur (usually uncemented), Use implant that provides fixation of the proximal and distal fragments. Conclusions: Majority of proximal femoral deformities managed with one-stage procedure: Excise deformity and replace with metal, Implants that allow ignoring deformity, Corrective osteotomy

Genu recurvatum deformity is uncommon in arthritic knees undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We retrospectively analysed radiographs and navigation data to determine the clinical and radiographic results of computer-assisted TKA in knee arthritis with recurvatum deformity. Based on alignment data obtained during computer assisted (CAS) TKA, 40 arthritic knees (36 patients) with a recurvatum deformity of at least 5° were identified. The mean recurvatum deformity was 8.7° (6° to 14°). On preoperative standing hip-ankle radiographs, 23 limbs (57.5%) had a mean varus deformity of 169.4° (153° to 178°) and 17 limbs had a mean valgus deformity of 189.2° (182° to 224°). The intraoperative navigation data showed mean tibial resection of 7.5mm (4.6 to 13.4mm) and distal femur resection of 7.5mm (3.3 to 13mm) with a mean final extension gap of 21.2mm and a flexion gap at 90° of 21.1mm and on extension. On table, the mean knee deformity in sagittal plane was 3° flexion (1.5° to 4.5° flexion). Postoperatively, the mean HKA angle on standing hip-ankle radiographs was 179.2° (177° to 182°). On postoperative lateral radiographs, joint line in extension was moved distally in 35 limbs by 2.3mm (0.3 to 4mm) and proximally in 5 limbs by 2.2mm (2.2 to 2.4mm); the mean preoperative posterior femoral offset of 28.7 mm changed to 27.9 mm postoperatively. At a mean follow up 28 months (14- 48 months) the knee, function, and pain scores improved by 61, 48, and 28 points, respectively and there was no recurrence of recurvatum deformity at final follow up. Genu recurvatum is a notoriously difficult condition to address at TKA. The challenges are to be able to detect it at surgery and take appropriate measures in terms of resection and releases to correct it satisfactorily. Computer assisted TKA helps to achieve excellent deformity correction, limb alignment, gap balancing and function in patients with recurvatum deformity by accurately quantifying and helping to modify the amount of bone cuts and titrate soft tissue release