Aims. This study aimed to gather insights from elbow experts using the Delphi method to evaluate the influence of patient characteristics and fracture morphology on the choice between operative and nonoperative treatment for coronoid fractures. Methods. A three-round electronic (e-)modified Delphi survey study was performed between March and December 2023. A total of 55 elbow surgeons from Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America participated, with 48 completing all questionnaires (87%). The panellists evaluated the factors identified as important in literature for treatment decision-making, using a Likert scale ranging from "strongly influences me to recommend nonoperative treatment" (1) to "strongly influences me to recommend operative treatment" (5). Factors achieving Likert scores ≤ 2.0 or ≥ 4.0 were deemed influential for treatment recommendation. Stable consensus is defined as an agreement of ≥ 80% in the second and third rounds. Results. Of 68 factors considered important in the literature for treatment choice for coronoid fractures, 18 achieved a stable consensus to be influential. Influential factors with stable consensus that advocate for operative treatment were being a professional athlete, playing overhead sports, a history of subjective dislocation or subluxation during trauma, open fracture, crepitation with range of movement, > 2 mm opening during varus stress on radiological imaging, and having an anteromedial facet or basal coronoid fracture (O’Driscoll type 2 or 3). An anterolateral coronoid tip fracture ≤ 2 mm was the only influential factor with a stable consensus that advocates for nonoperative treatment. Most disagreement existed regarding the treatment for the terrible triad injury with an anterolateral coronoid tip fracture fragment ≤ 2 mm (O’Driscoll type 1 subtype 1). Conclusion. This study gives insights into areas of consensus among surveyed elbow surgeons in choosing between operative and nonoperative management of coronoid fractures. These findings should be used in conjunction with previous patient cohort studies when discussing treatment options with patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1150–1157

Background: Posterior dislocation of the elbow with fractures of the radial head and coronoid process is a rare injury which, when treated conservatively, has a high redislocation rate and poor results (7/11 in the largest published series). Methods: Six patients with this injury were treated with triple reconstruction, involving exploration of the joint via a lateral approach with insertion of a radial head prosthesis. The coronoid fracture and anterior capsule was repaired (using an in-to-out technique) and the lateral collateral ligament was reat-tached, using Mitek Super Anchors. All patients were evaluated prospectively. Results: The average age was 52 years (37–75y). At one year follow up all elbows remained in joint and all were pain free or causing slight pain only. The average range of ulno-humeral movement was 55 degrees (range 38–68) and the average forearm rotation was 67 degrees (range 18–104). Functional assessment showed an average Liverpool score of 23/36 (range 17–29) and average Broberg and Morrey score of 74/100 (range 68–84). Conclusions: Triple reconstruction recognises and remedies the three elements of this devastating injury. All of these must be addressed in order to fulþll the short-term goal of restoring and maintaining stability. Our patients have a stable, pain free, though stiff, elbow in contrast to the poor results reported from previous conservative and operative treatments

Aims. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between the degree of injury to the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL and LCL) and associated fractures in patients with a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow, using CT and MRI. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients who presented between March 2009 and March 2018 with a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow and who underwent CT and MRI. CT revealed fractures of the radial head, coronoid process, and medial and lateral humeral epicondyles. MRI was used to identify contusion of the bone and collateral ligament injuries by tear, partial or complete tear. Results. A total of 54 patients had a fracture; some had more than one. Radial head fractures were found in 25 patients and coronoid fractures in 42. Lateral and medial humeral epicondylar fractures were found in eight and six patients, respectively. Contusion of the capitellum was found in 43 patients and rupture of the LCL was seen in all patients (partial in eight and complete in 56), there was complete rupture of the MCL in 37 patients, partial rupture in 19 and eight had no evidence of rupture. The LCL tear did not significantly correlate with the presence of fracture, but the MCL rupture was complete in patients with a radial head fracture (p = 0.047) and there was significantly increased association in those without a coronoid fracture (p = 0.015). Conclusion. In posterolateral dislocation of the elbow, LCL ruptures are mostly complete, while the MCL exhibits various degrees of injury, which are significantly associated with the associated fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):227–231

In the setting of traumatic elbow injuries involving coronoid fractures, the relative size of the coronoid fragment has been shown to relate to the stability of the joint. Currently, the challenge lies in accurately classifying the amount of bone loss in coronoid fractures. In comminuted fractures, bone loss is difficult to measure with plain radiographs or computed tomography. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel radiographic measure, the Coronoid Opening Angle (COA), on lateral elbow radiographs. We demonstrate the relationship of the COA to coronoid height and describe how this measure can be used to estimate bone loss and potentially predict elbow instability following coronoid fracture. Radiographs were drawn from a regional database in a consecutive fashion. Candidate radiographs were excluded on the basis of radiographic evidence of degenerative changes, previous surgery or injury, bony deformity, and inadequate lateral view of the elbow. The COA was measured as the angle between the long axis of the ulna at the level of the trochlear notch, and the tip of coronoid, from a common origin at the posterior cortex of the olecranon. Images were reviewed by a fellowship trained upper extremity surgeon, an upper extremity fellow, and a junior resident. Normal COA, coronoid height, and calculated COA at varying amounts of bone loss were calculated by three reviewers. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine how the COA can most effectively predict bone loss at varying coronoid heights. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for 39 subjects. Seventy-two subjects were included for analysis (M=40, F=32). The normal coronoid opening angle is 33.19 degrees [32.2 – 34.2]. Coronoid height is 18.8 mm [18.1 – 19.6]. Extrapolating this baseline data, the COA at 20%, 33%, and 50% of coronoid bone loss was calculated to be 27.5, 23.5, and 18 degrees, respectively. ICC was found to be 0.90 or higher. Cutoff values were determined to maximize the sensitivity of the COA. A cutoff value of 21 degrees has a 92% sensitivity in detecting a minimum of 50% bone loss. The COA with similar sensitivity in predicting 20% and 33% bone loss are 32 and 27 degrees. The coronoid opening angle is a novel technique that can be used on a lateral elbow radiograph to predict the minimum coronoid bone loss. This can be used to guide clinical decision making and potentially predict instability. Future research will aim to validate this tool in the clinical setting in predicting instability

Passive and active elbow flexion was performed in eight cadaveric arms to determine the effect of Type 1 coronoid fractures and suture repair on kinematics. Testing was performed in ligamentously intact and MCL deficient elbows; with radial head arthroplasty (RHA); with an intact coronoid, following a Type 1 fracture, and with suture repair of the coronoid. There was an alteration in elbow kinematics and stability following Type 1 coronoid fractures that was not corrected with coronoid repair. Suture fixation of the coronoid is probably unnecessary if the lateral ligaments are repaired and the radial head is repaired or replaced. To determine the effect of fixation of Type 1 coronoid fractures on elbow stability and kinematics in ligamentously intact and medial collateral ligament (MCL) deficient elbows with radial head arthroplasty (RHA). Type 1 coronoid fractures cause changes in elbow kinematics and stability that are not corrected with suture repair. Suture fixation of Type 1 coronoid fractures is probably unnecessary if the lateral ligaments are repaired and the radial head is repaired or replaced. With intact ligaments, there was an increase in valgus angulation following a Type 1 coronoid fracture (p< 0.05) that was not corrected with fixation. With MCL deficiency, there was no change in valgus angulation for all coronoid states. For both ligament states, there was an increase maximum varus-valgus laxity after a Type 1 coronoid fracture with forearm pronation (p=0.03) that was not corrected with fixation (p=0.4). Kinematic data was collected from eight cadaveric arms during passive and simulated active elbow motion. The protocol was performed in stable and MCL deficient elbows with RHA. Testing occurred with the coronoid intact, following Type 1 coronoid fracture, and with suture repair of the fracture. Valgus angulation and maximum varus-valgus laxity were measured. With intact ligaments, Type 1 coronoid fractures cause an alteration in elbow kinematics and laxity that is not corrected with suture fixation. With MCL disruption, Type 1 coronoid fractures have no effect on elbow kinematics and a small effect on laxity that is not corrected with coronoid repair. Funding: Research and Institutional Support received from Wright Medical Technologies. Please contact author for graphs and/or diagrams

Coronoid fractures account for 2 to 15% of the cases with elbow dislocations and usually occur as part of complex injuries. Comminuted fractures and non-unions necessitate coronoid fixation, reconstruction or replacement. The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare the axial stability achieved via an individualized 3D printed prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem to both radial head grafted reconstruction and coronoid fixation with 2 screws. It was hypothesized that the prosthetic replacement will provide superior stability over the grafted reconstruction and screw fixation. Following CT scanning, 18 human cadaveric proximal ulnas were osteotomized at 40% of the coronoid height and randomized to 3 groups (n = 6). The specimens in Group 1 were treated with an individually designed 3D printed stainless steel coronoid prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem, individually designed based on the contralateral coronoid scan. The ulnas in Group 2 were reconstructed with an ipsilateral radial head autograft fixed with two anteroposterior screws, whereas the osteotomized coronoids in Group 3 were fixed in situ with two anteroposterior screws. All specimens were biomechanically tested under ramped quasi-static axial loading to failure at a rate of 10 mm/min. Construct stiffness and failure load were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed at a level of significance set at 0.05. Prosthetic treatment (Group 1) resulted in significantly higher stiffness and failure load compared to both radial head autograft reconstruction (Group 2) and coronoid screw fixation, p ≤ 0.002. Stiffness and failure load did not reveal any significant differences between Group 2 and Group 3, p ≥ 0.846. In cases of coronoid deficiency, replacement of the coronoid process with an anatomically shaped individually designed 3D printed prosthesis with a curved cemented intramedullary stem seems to be an effective method to restore the buttress function of the coronoid under axial loading. This method provides superior stability over both radial head graft reconstruction and coronoid screw fixation, while achieving anatomical articular congruity. Therefore, better load distribution with less stress at the bone-implant interface can be anticipated. In the clinical practice, implementation of this prosthesis type could allow for early patient mobilization with better short- and long-term treatment outcomes and may be beneficial for patients with irreparable comminuted coronoid fractures, severe arthritic changes or non-unions

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of Monteggia-like lesions at midterm follow-up and to determine whether the surgical treatment of the radial head influences the clinical and radiological results. Patients and Methods. A total of 78 patients with a Monteggia-like lesion, including 44 women and 34 men with a mean age of 54.7 years (19 to 80), were available for assessment after a mean 4.6 years (2 to 9.2). The outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Radiographs were analyzed for all patients. A total of 12 Mason type I, 16 type II, and 36 type III fractures were included. Surgical treatment consisted of screw fixation for all type II and reconstructable type III fractures, while radial head arthroplasty (RHA) or excision was performed if reconstruction was not possible. Results. The mean MEPS was 88.9 (40 to 100), mean OES was 40.1 (25 to 48), mean MMWS was 88.1 (50 to 100), mean DASH score was 14.7 (0 to 60.2), and mean movement was 114° (. sd. 27) in extension/flexion and 155° (. sd. 37) in pronation/supination. Mason III fractures, particularly those with an associated coronoid fracture treated with RHA, had a significantly poorer outcome. Suboptimal results were also identified in patients who had degenerative changes or heterotopic ossification on their latest radiograph. In contrast, all patients with successful radial head reconstruction or excision had a good outcome. Conclusion. Good outcomes can be achieved in Monteggia-like lesions with Mason II and III fractures, when reconstruction is possible. Otherwise, RHA is a reliable option with satisfactory outcomes, especially in patients with ligamenteous instability. Whether the radial head should be excised remains debatable, although good results were achieved in patients with ligamentous stability and in those with complications after RHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1512–1519

Purpose. Current coronoid fracture classification systems are based on fragment size and configuration using plain radiographs and/or CT. During surgery, coronoid fracture fragments appear much larger than anticipated because cartilage is radiolucent and therefore not taken into account with preoperative imaging. The purpose of this study was to quantify the articular cartilage thickness of the coronoid process, with reference to coronoid fracture classifications. Method. Twenty-four cadaveric ulnae were dissected, imaged, and analyzed using the OsiriX software program (3.6–64 bit, Geneva). Thirteen identifiable landmarks were chosen on the coronoid, olecranon and proximal radioulnar joint to measure articular cartilage thickness. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were calculated. Results. Cartilage thickness was highest at the coronoid tip with a mean of 3.0 mm (range, 1.7–4.6mm). Cartilage thickness at the tip was inversely correlated with age (p<0.01), and strongly correlated with overall ulnar height and ulnar length (p<0.05). All measurements had excellent intra-observer and inter-observer reliability. Conclusion. The thickness of cartilage on the coronoid tip is not insignificant. For example, a 2mm coronoid tip fracture on CT scan may actually appear to be 6 mm thick when viewed clinically at the time of surgery, which may alter the classification category, the decision to treat, or the fixation chosen. Similarly, published cadaveric biomechanical studies have incorporated the thickness of cartilage when creating simulated fractures, introducing a discrepancy between biomechanical studies and clinical studies relying on radiographs. Surgeons should be aware of this discrepancy

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate two hypotheses. First, that disruption of posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (PMCL) has to occur for the elbow to subluxate in cases of posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) and second, that ulnohumeral contact pressures increase after disruption of the PMCL. Materials and Methods. Six human cadaveric elbows were prepared on a custom-designed apparatus which allowed muscle loading and passive elbow motion under gravitational varus. Joint contact pressures were measured sequentially in the intact elbow (INTACT), followed by an anteromedial subtype two coronoid fracture (COR), a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) tear (COR + LCL), and a PMCL tear (COR + LCL + PMCL). Results. There was no subluxation or joint incongruity in the INTACT, COR, and COR + LCL specimens. All specimens in the COR + LCL + PMCL group subluxated under gravity-varus loads. The mean articular contact pressure of the COR + LCL group was significantly higher than those in the INTACT and the COR groups. The mean articular contact pressure of the COR + LCL + PMCL group was significantly higher than that of the INTACT group, but not higher than that of the COR + LCL group. Conclusion. In the presence of an anteromedial fracture and disruption of the LCL, the posterior bundle of the MCL has to be disrupted for gross subluxation of the elbow to occur. However, elevated joint contact pressures are seen after an anteromedial fracture and LCL disruption even in the absence of such subluxation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1060–5

Purpose. The coronoid process is an integral component for elbow stability. In the setting of a comminuted coronoid fracture, where repair is not possible, a prosthetic device may be beneficial in restoring elbow stability. The hypothesis of this in-vitro biomechanical study was that an anatomic coronoid prosthesis would restore stability to the coronoid deficient elbow. Method. A metal coronoid prosthesis was designed and developed based on CT-derived images adjusted for cartilage thickness. The kinematics and stability of eight fresh-frozen male cadaveric arms (mean age 77.4 years, range 69–92 years) were quantified in the intact state; after collateral ligament sectioning and repair (control state); after a simulated 40% transverse coronoid fracture; and after implantation of a coronoid prosthesis. Elbow flexion was simulated passively with the arm oriented in the varus position and the forearm in pronation. Varus-valgus angulation (VV) and internal-external rotation (IE) of the ulna relative to the humerus were quantified with an electromagnetic tracking system (Flock of Birds, Ascension Technologies, Burlington, VT, static accuracy: 1.8mm position, 0.5 orientation). Results. No significant difference was found between the intact elbow and the native coronoid control state with collateral ligament repair (mean standard deviation) (VV=0.13.1, p=0.9; IE=0.82.59, p=0.4). A significant decrease in stability was observed following the 40% coronoid fracture (VV=5.73.4, p<0.01; IE=10.93.35, p<0.001). Following coronoid hemi-arthroplasty, no significant difference in stability was found between the coronoid prosthesis and the control state (VV=0.22.7, p=1.0; IE=1.33.0, p=0.8). Conclusion. An anatomic coronoid prosthesis restores the stability of the coronoid deficient elbow similar to the intact state. Further studies are needed to determine the optimum fixation method of this device and to determine the range of sizes which would be required for the successful commercialization of this device for patient use. Clinical trials will be required to confirm the favourable findings of this in-vitro investigation

There is an increasing trend towards radial head replacement (RHR) or fixation for complex radial head fractures. These injuries are identified by grossly displaced fragments or elbow instability. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of a surgical protocol that emphasised delayed radial-head excision (RHE) as the procedure of choice. When the humero-ulnar joint was congruent, intervention was delayed 10 to 14 days to allow time for ligamentous healing. RHR was performed if instability was demonstrated on-table. A retrospective study was performed to identify the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for a radial head fracture between 2008 and 2014. There were 18 Mason Type III and 18 Mason Type IV injuries. There was an associated coronoid fracture in 17 patients. RHE was performed in 28 patients, of which the reoperation rate was 2 (7.1%). RHR was performed in 15 patients, of whom 4 (27%) had reintervention. RHR was most common in the Type III coronoid fractures. The cumulative reoperation rate was 9.3% at six months and 15.4% at two years. The median Oxford Elbow Score (OES) was 85.4 (IQR 73.4 to 99.5). Time from injury was the only predictor of the Oxford Elbow Score (p=0.04). This surgical protocol resulted in a reduced need for RHR, a low reintervention rate, and satisfactory function. RHR should be reserved for cases where stability cannot be achieved on-table. Stability can be maximised by delaying RHE until early ligamentous healing occurs

We undertook this study to determine the minimum amount of coronoid necessary to stabilise an otherwise intact elbow joint. Regan–Morrey types II and III, plus medial and lateral oblique coronoid fractures, collectively termed type IV fractures, were simulated in nine fresh cadavers. An electromagnetic tracking system defined the three-dimensional stability of the ulna relative to the humerus. The coronoid surface area accounts for 59% of the anterior articulation. Alteration in valgus, internal and external rotation occurred only with a type III coronoid fracture, accounting for 68% of the coronoid and 40% of the entire articular surface. A type II fracture removed 42% of the coronoid articulation and 25% of the entire articular surface but was associated with valgus and external rotational changes only when the radial head was removed, thereby removing 67% of the articular surface. We conclude that all type III fractures, as defined here, are unstable, even with intact ligaments and a radial head. However, a type II deficiency is stable unless the radial head is removed. Our study suggests that isolated medial-oblique or lateral-oblique fractures, and even a type II fracture with intact ligaments and a functional radial head, can be clinically stable, which is consistent with clinical observation.

Fractures of the anteromedial facet (AO/OTA 21-B1.1, O'Driscoll Type 2, subtype 3) are associated with varus posteromedial rotational instability of the ulnohumeral joint and early post-traumatic arthritis. The purpose of this study was to examine the stability of plate (locking and non-locking) vs screw constructs in the fixation of anteromedial coronoid facet fractures in a sawbone model. An anteromedial coronoid facet fracture (AO/OTA 21-B1.1) was simulated in 24 synthetic ulna bones. They were then assigned into 3 fracture fixation groups: non-locking plate fixation, locking plate fixation, and dual cortical screw fixation. An AO 2.0 mm screw and plate system was used for the plate fixation groups and 2.0 mm cortical screws were used for the screw-only group. Following fixation, each construct was potted in bismuth alloy and secured to a servohydraulic load frame. Each construct was cycled in tension and then in compression at 0.5Hz. For both cycling modalities, an incremental loading pattern was used starting at 40 N and increased by 20 N every 200 cycles up to 200N. Fracture fragment displacement was recorded with an optical tracking system. Following cyclic loading each construct was loaded to failure (displacement >2 mm) at 10mm/min. Tension cycling – All constructs in the plated groups (locking and non-locking constructs) survived the cyclic tension loading protocol (to 200N) with maximum fragment displacement of 12.60um and 14.50um respectively. There was no statistical difference between the plated constructs at any load level. No screw-only fixed construct survived the tension protocol with mean force at failure of 110N (range 60–180N). Compression Testing – All constructs in the plated groups (locking and non-locking constructs) survived the cyclic compression loading protocol (to 200N), while all but one of the screw-only fixation constructs survived. Fracture fragment displacement was significantly greater in the screw-only repair group across all loading levels when compared to the plated constructs. There was no statistically significant difference in fragment motion between the locking and non-locking groups. Failure Testing – The maximum load at failure in the screw-only group (281.9 N) was significantly lower than locking and non-locking constructs (587.0 N and 515.5N respectively, p <0.05). There was no difference between the locking and non-locking group in mean load to failure or mean stiffness. Screw construct stiffness (337.2 N/mm) was lower than the locking and non-locking constructs (682.9 N/mm and 479.1 N/mm respectively) however this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.051). Fixation of anteromedial coronoid fractures is best achieved with a plating technique. Locking plates did not offer any advantage over conventional plates. Isolated screw fixation might not provide adequate stability for these fractures which could result in loss of reduction leading to post-traumatic arthrosis or instabilility

The objective of this retrospective study was to correlate the Bado and Jupiter classifications with long-term results after operative treatment of Monteggia fractures in adults and to determine prognostic factors for functional outcome. Of 63 adult patients who sustained a Monteggia fracture in a ten-year period, 47 were available for follow-up after a mean time of 8.4 years (5 to 14). According to the Broberg and Morrey elbow scale, 22 patients (47%) had excellent, 12 (26%) good, nine (19%) fair and four (8%) poor results at the last follow-up. A total of 12 patients (26%) needed a second operation within 12 months of the initial operation. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 87.2 (45 to 100) and the mean DASH score was 17.4 (0 to 70). There was a significant correlation between the two scores (p = 0.01). The following factors were found to be correlated with a poor clinical outcome: Bado type II fracture, Jupiter type IIa fracture, fracture of the radial head, coronoid fracture, and complications requiring further surgery. Bado type II Monteggia fractures, and within this group, Jupiter type IIa fractures, are frequently associated with fractures of the radial head and the coronoid process, and should be considered as negative prognostic factors for functional long-term outcome. Patients with these types of fracture should be informed about the potential risk of functional deficits and the possible need for further surgery

Purpose. The coronoid and collateral ligaments are key elbow stabilizers. When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. A coronoid prosthesis has been designed with an extended tip in an effort to augment elbow stability in the setting of residual collateral ligament insufficiency. The purpose of this biomechanical study, therefore, was to compare an anatomic coronoid replacement with an extended tip implant both with and without ligament insufficiency. Method. Two coronoid prostheses were designed and developed based on CT-derived images adjusted for cartilage thickness: an anatomical implant and an extended-tip implant. Passive elbow extension was performed in 7 cadaveric arms in the varus and valgus positions. Varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus was quantified with a tracking system with an intact coronoid, a 40% coronoid deficiency, an anatomical prosthesis, and an extended prosthesis, with the collateral ligaments sectioned and repaired. Results. Laxity increased following a 40% coronoid deficiency with both repaired (p<0.01) and sectioned collateral ligaments (p<0.01). With the ligaments repaired, there was no significant difference in laxity between the intact coronoid, the anatomic implant or the extended implant (p=0.88). Ligament sectioning with an intact coronoid produced severe joint instability, resulting in an average laxity (standard error) of 42.94.4 (p<0.01). With ligament sectioning, the anatomic prosthesis produced no change in laxity compared to the intact coronoid (p=0.72), whereas the extended implant reduced laxity by 20.56.3 (p=0.05). Conclusion. A coronoid prosthesis with an extended coronoid tip improves elbow stability relative to an anatomic prosthesis in the setting of collateral ligament insufficiency. This may prove useful in patients with comminuted coronoid fractures with concomitant ligament injuries, allowing for maintenance of elbow stability during ligament healing or reconstruction. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of these designs and to determine patient outcomes

Stability of the elbow joint is provided primarily by the integrity of the ulno humeral articulation. Secondary contributions to stability are provided by the radio-capitelar joint and the medial collateral ligament complex. Lesser contributions are provided by the lateral ligament and the joint capsule. A dislocation which is complicated by an injury to one of these main stabilising structures will have a greater risk of instability and recurrent dislocation. Poor outcomes have been noted to occur with both coronoid fractures and significant radial head fractures. There is a group of patients with a more severe injury within this spectrum who have a pattern of injury which leads to gross instability. This “unhappy triad” is a dislocation where there is an associated coronoid fracture, a radial head fracture and complete disruption of the medial collateral ligament complex. These severe injuries tend to present to a specialist after significant delay with recurrent dislocation following failure of initial management. Three cases will be presented to illustrate the anatomical considerations and management strategies for this pattern of injury by immediate reconstruction, hinged external fixation or elbow replacement

A total of 14 women and seven men with a mean age of 43 years (18 to 68) who sustained a Mason type IV fracture of the elbow, without an additional type II or III coronoid fracture, were evaluated after a mean of 21 years (14 to 46). Primary treatment included closed elbow reduction followed by immobilisation in a plaster in all cases, with an additional excision of the radial head in 11, partial resection in two and suturing of the annular ligament in two. Delayed radial head excision was performed in two patients and an ulnar nerve transposition in one. The uninjured elbows served as controls. Nine patients had no symptoms, 11 reported slight impairment, and one severe impairment of the elbow. Elbow flexion was impaired by a mean of 3° (. sd. 4) and extension by a mean of 9° (. sd. 4) (p < 0.01). None experienced chronic elbow instability or recurrent dislocation. There were more degenerative changes in the formerly injured elbows, but none had developed a reduction in joint space. We conclude that most patients with a Mason type IV fracture of the elbow report a good long-term outcome

Introduction. The stability of the elbow joint following an acute elbow dislocation is dependent on associated injuries. The ability to identify these concomitant injuries correctly directs management and improves the chances of a successful outcome. Interpretation of plain radiographs in the presence of either a dislocation or post-reduction films with plaster in-situ is difficult. This study aimed to assess the ability of orthopaedic registrars to accurately identify associated bony injuries on initial plain radiographs using CT as the gold standard for comparison. Methods. Patients over the age of 16 years undergoing an elbow CT scan within one week of a documented elbow dislocation between 1st June 2010 and 1st June 2014 were included in the study. Three orthopaedic registrars independently reviewed both the initial dislocation and immediate post reduction plain radiographs to identify any associated bony injuries. This radiograph review was repeated by each registrar after two weeks. The incidence of associated injuries as well as the inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated. Results. 28 patients were included in the study. 54% of the patients were female and the mean age was 45 years (range 16 to 90 years). The incidence of a radial head fracture was 54%, coronoid fracture 43% and epicondyle avulsion 18% on CT. The inter-observer reliability was only shown to be fair amongst registrars and the intra-observer variability moderate. Conclusions. Computerised tomography is a useful adjunct in the assessment of associated osseous injuries following an elbow dislocation due to the presence of a high number of injuries. Plain radiographs alone have been shown to have only a fair and moderate inter and intra-observer variability respectively, therefore a low threshold to obtain further 3D imaging should be practised. Level of Evidence. IV

The aim of this study was to report the outcome of radial head replacement for complex fractures of the radial head, and determine any risk factors for prosthesis removal or revision. We identified 119 patients who were managed acutely using primary radial head replacement for an unstable fracture of the radial head over a 15-year period. Demographic data, fracture classification, management, complications and subsequent surgeries were recorded following retrospective clinical record review. There were 105 (88%) patients with a mean age of 50 yrs (16–93) and 54% (n=57) were female. There were 95 (91%) radial head fractures and 96% were a Mason type 3 or 4 injury. There were 98 associated injuries in 70 patients (67%), with an associated coronoid fracture (n=29, 28%) most frequent. All implants were uncemented monopolar prostheses, with 86% metallic and 14% silastic. At a mean short-term follow-up of 1 year (range, 0.1–5.5; n=87) the mean Broberg and Morrey score was 80 (range, 40–99), with 49.5% achieving an excellent or good outcome. At a final mean review of 6.7 yrs (1.8–17.8), 29 (27%) patients had undergone revision (n=3) or removal (n=26) of the prosthesis. Independent risk factors of prosthesis removal or revision were silastic implant type (p=0.010) and younger age (p=0.015). This is the largest series in the literature documenting the outcome following radial head replacement for complex fractures of the radial head. We have demonstrated a high rate of removal or revision for all implants, with younger patients and silastic implants independent risk factors