Introduction. Manifestation of high interface stresses coupled with micromotion at the interface can render the taper lock joint in a modular hip replacement prosthesis at risk for failure. Bending can lead to crevice formation between the trunnion and the head and can potentially expose the interface to the biological fluids, generating interface corrosion. Additionally, development of high stresses can cause the material to yield, ultimately leading to irreversible damage to the implant. The objective of this study is to elucidate the mechanical response of taper junction in different material combination assemblies, under the maximum loads applied during everyday activities. Methods. Computer simulations were executed using a verified FE model. A stable hexahedral mesh (33648 elements) was generated for the trunnion (taper size: 12/14mm) and a tetrahedral mesh (51182 elements) for the head (CoCr, size: 32mm). An assembly load of 4000N was applied along the trunnion axis followed by the application of a load of 230–4300N at 25° and 10° angle to the trunnion axis in the frontal and sagittal planes. A linear static solution was set up using Siemens NX Nastran. Two material combinations were tested - cobalt-chrome head with a titanium alloy trunnion and
Introduction. Wear and corrosion between head and stem tapers of modular hip implants have recently been related to clinical failures, possibly due to high friction moments in poorly lubricated joints [1–2]. In-vivo measurements have revealed reversing joint friction moments in the hip during a gait cycle [3], which may foster relative motion between the modular components. Blood, soft tissue or bone debris at the taper interface during assembly can lead to decreased stability or increased stress concentrations due to non-uniform loading [4]. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of taper contamination and the assembly force on the seating characteristic of the head on the stem incorporating realistic reversing joint friction moments. Methods.
A multitude of different bearing combinations exist to recreate the artificial hip joint. To date, there is no particular ‘gold-standard’ total hip arthroplasty (THA) couple since none is faultless. Strategies to improve performance are aimed either at modifying the shape and design of components or their material properties. Wear particle generation is now well recognised as a cause of aseptic loosening which consistently features amongst the most common indication for revision THA and thus minimising wear lies at the cornerstone of developing bearing couples. However, history has shown the use of supposed newer and improved materials have not been without occasional catastrophic failure. Hard-on-hard bearings are theoretically more resistant to wear but component fracture and squeaking has been witnessed with ceramic-on-ceramic articulations whilst metal-on-metal articulations have been plagued by reports of pseudotumor and ALVAL formation. This has all led to resurgence in the hard-on-soft couple. More recently, corrosion at taper junctions has been identified as a significant factor in hip arthroplasty failure. Femoral head materials, surface changes or coatings may therefore have an increasing role to play. In 2005, a multi-center, prospective, assessor and patient-blinded, randomised control trial was initiated. This was designed as a three armed study with either cobalt-chrome or oxidized zirconium femoral heads articulating against highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners and oxidized zirconium articulating against ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Early reports that XLPE was significantly superior to UHMWPE when coupled with cobalt-chrome meant no patient involved in the study was approved to receive a couple of cobalt-chrome and UHMWPE since it was deemed to be a high wear group. We hypothesised that oxidized zirconium femoral heads would produce less linear wear than cobalt- chrome femoral heads at mid-term evaluation, whilst maintain similar outcomes when recording WOMAC, SF-36 and pain scores, and complication rates. All three groups were statistically comparable preoperatively and at five years when measuring normalised WOMAC, SF-36 and pain scale scores; all groups showed a statistically significant improvement in scores from baseline compared to at five years (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in mean femoral head penetration when either oxidized zirconium or cobalt-chrome where articulated with XLPE (p=0.1533) but a significant difference in mean femoral head penetration was observed between the group that had used UHMWPE and both the other groups which had used XLPE (p<0.001). There were no hips in which either acetabular or femoral osteolysis was observed. We have demonstrated that oxidized zirconium femoral heads are safe with low rates of wear when coupled with XLPE. However at five year follow-up, it appears that the choice of material of the acetabular bearing is more important than the choice of femoral head bearing. Further follow-up is needed in order to see if femoral head choice leads to a difference in outcome beyond 5 years as laboratory data suggests. Moreover the potential reduction of corrosion with ceramic or oxidized zirconium heads may yet also prove to be significant. It is likely that current and future data will lead us away from the use
Introduction. Geometric variations of the hip joint can give rise to abnormal joint loading causing increased stress on the articular cartilage, which may ultimately lead to degenerative joint disease. In-vitro simulations of total hip replacements (THRs) have been widely reported in the literature, however, investigations exploring the tribology of two contacting cartilage surfaces, and cartilage against metal surfaces using complete hip joint models are less well reported. The aim of this study was to develop an in-vitro simulation system for investigating and comparing the tribology of complete natural hip joints and hemiarthroplasties with THR tribology. The simulation system was used to assess natural porcine hip joints and porcine hemiarthroplasty hip joints. Mean friction factor was used as the primary outcome measure to make between-group comparisons, and comparisons with previously published tribological studies. Method. In-vitro simulations were conducted on harvested porcine tissue. A method was developed enabling natural acetabula to be orientated with varying angles of version and inclination, and natural femoral heads to be potted centrally with different orientations in all three planes. Acetabula were potted with 45° of inclination and in the complete joint studies, natural femoral heads were anatomically matched and aligned (n=5). Hemiarthroplasty studies (n=5) were conducted using