Background. A cautious outlook towards neck injuries is the norm to avoid missing cervical spine injuries. Consequently there has been an increased use of cervical spine radiography. The Canadian Cervical Spine rule was proposed to reduce the unnecessary use of cervical spine radiography in alert and stable patients. Our aim was to see whether applying the Canadian Cervical Spine rule reduced the need for cervical spine radiography without missing significant cervical spine injuries. Methods. This was a retrospective study conducted in 2 hospitals. 114 alert and stable patients who had cervical spine radiographs done for suspected neck injuries were included in the study. Data on patient demographics, Canadian Cervical Spine rule, cervical spine radiography results and further visits after discharge were recorded. Results. 14 patients were included in the high risk category according to the Canadian Cervical Spine rule. 100 patients were assessed according to the low risk category. If the Canadian Cervical Spine rule was applied, there was a significant reduction in cervical spine radiographs (p<0.001) as 86/100 patients (86%) in the low risk category would not have needed cervical spine radiograph. 2/100 patients who had significant cervical spine injuries would have been identified when the Canadian Cervical Spine rule was applied. Conclusion. Applying the Canadian Cervical Spine rule for neck injuries in alert and stable patients reduced the use of cervical spine radiographs without missing out significant cervical spine injuries. This relates to reduction in radiation exposure to patients and cost benefits

Background. One of the basic principles in the primary survey of a trauma patient is immobilisation of the cervical spine till cleared of any injury. Lateral cervical spine radiograph is the gold standard initial radiographic assessment. More than often additional radiographs like the Swimmer's view are necessary for adequate visualisation of the cervical spine. How good is the Swimmer's view in visualisation of the cervical spine after an inadequate lateral cervical spine radiograph?. Materials & methods. 100 Swimmer's view radiographs randomly selected over a 2 year period in trauma patients were included for the study. All the patients had inadequate lateral cervical spine radiographs. The radiographs were assessed with regards to their adequacy by a single observer. The criteria for adequacy were adequate visualisation of the C7 body, C7/T1 junction and the soft tissue shadow. Results. Only 55% of the radiographs were adequate. None of the inadequate radiographs provided adequate visualisation of the C7 body and the C7/T1 junction. In 19% radiographs the soft tissue shadow was unclear. Poor exposure accounted for 53% of the inadequacies while overlapping bones accounted for the rest. Conclusion. Clearing the cervical spine prior to removing triple immobilisation is essential in a trauma patient. This needs adequate visualisation from C1 to C7/T1 junction. In our study Swimmer's views did not satisfactorily provide adequate visualisation of the cervical spine in trauma patients. We recommend screening the cervical spine by a CT scan when the cervical spine lateral radiographs and Swimmer's views are inadequate

Reduced cervical spine canal AP diameter is linked to the development of spinal cord injury and myelopathy. This is of particular interest to clinicians in New Zealand, given a unique socio-ethnic make-up and prevalent participation in collision sport. Our study builds upon previous unpublished evidence, by analysing normal cervical spine CT scans to explore morphological differences in the sub-axial cervical spine canal, between New Zealand European, Māori and Paciāca individuals. 670 sub-axial cervical vertebrae (C3-C7) were analysed radiographically using high resolution CT trauma scans, showing no acute pathology with respect to the cervical spine. All measurements were made uPlising mulP-planar reconstruction software to obtain slices parallel to the superior endplate at each vertebral level. Maximal canal diameter was measured in the AP and transverse planes. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). We included 250 Maori, 250 NZ European and 170 Paciāca vertebrae (455 male, 215 female). Statistically and clinically signiācant differences were found in sagittal canal diameter between all ethnicities, at all spinal levels. NZ European vertebrae demonstrated the largest AP diameter and Paciāca the smallest, at all levels. Transverse canal diameter showed no signiācant difference between ethnicities, however the raatio of AP:transverse diameter was signiācantly different at all spinal levels except C3. Subjective morphological differences in the shape of the vertebral canal were noted, with Māori and Paciāca patients tending towards a flatter, curved canal shape. A previous study of 166 patients (Coldham, G. et al. 2006) found cervical canal AP diameter to be narrower in Māori and Paciāca patients than in NZ Europeans. Our study, evaluating the normal population, conārms these differences are likely reflecPve of genuine variation between these ethniciPes. Future research is required to critically evaluate the morphologic differences noted during this study

Bone localization of tuberculosis mainly affects the thoracolumbar spine. The cervical spine is rare. Its diagnosis is often late which exposes to great instability and potentially serious complications. We reported the case of a patient with cervical spine tuberculosis with a rare localisation. A 10-years old boy with no medical history, showed torticolis and high temperature without neurological complication. In the physical examination, he had torticolis and pain in the third, forth and fifth cervical vertebra. The biology showed high CRP 200mg/l. The tomodensitometry of the cervical spine showed a collection of the third cervical spine. The patient took non specific Antibiotics for two months with no radiological improvement. When biopsy was performed, we find an inter apophysis (between C3 and C4) collection. The histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of apophysis tuberculosis. The cervical spine is a rare localisation of the tuberculosis. The apophysis localisation is a more uncommon localisation. The diagnosis is difficult. The histological examination is essential for the diagnosis. The management based on tuberculosis chemotherapy and immobilization started as soon as possible

Objectives. To demonstrate that instrumented fusion of the paediatric cervical spine is possible and can be performed safely. Study Design. A retrospective review of paediatric patients who had instrumented fusion of the cervical spine. Materials and method. Sixteen paediatric patients (10 male, 6 female) with a mean age of 8 years who underwent instrumented cervical fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Surgery was performed for trauma (5 cases), spinal tuberculosis (3 cases), congenital anomalies (6 cases) and malignancies (2 cases). Fixation methods included occipito-cervical fusion, pedicle and lateral mass screws and anterior cervical plating. Ten posterior approaches, four anterior approaches and four combined anterior and posterior approaches were performed. We looked at fusion rates, blood loss, levels fused, theatre time, technique and complications. Results. All patients achieved radiological and clinical fusion. The average number of levels fused was 2.5, blood loss 418ml and theatre time 222 minutes for all patients. Anterior procedures had an average of 1 levels fused, blood loss 117ml and theatre time 98 minutes. Posterior procedures had an average number of 1.9 levels fused, blood loss of 306ml and theatre time of 131 minutes. For the combined anterior and posterior procedures the average levels fused were 5.5, blood loss 975ml and theatre time 248 minutes. Five surgery related complications were encountered. These consisted of dural leaks and wound sepsis which were all treated effectively. Conclusion. The use of modern segmental spinal instrumentation in the paediatric cervical spine is a viable option in this young population. Although our study sample was small we are able to demonstrate that no major surgical complications were encountered due to the use of cervical spinal instrumentation. NO DISCLOSURES

Neck pain can be caused by pressure on the spinal cord or nerve roots from bone or disc impingement. This can be treated by surgically decompressing the cervical spine, which involves excising the bone or disc that is impinging on the nerves or widening the spinal canal or neural foramen. Conventional practise is to fuse the adjacent intervertebral joint after surgery to prevent intervertebral motion and subsequent recompression of the spinal cord or nerve root. However fusion procedures cause physiological stress transfer to adjacent segments which may cause Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD), a rapid degeneration of the adjacent discs due to increased stress. ASD is more likely to occur in fusions of two or more levels than single level fusions and is more common where there is existing degeneration of the adjacent discs, which is not unusual in people over 30 years of age. Partial dynamic stabilisation, which generally involves a semi-rigid spinal fixation, allows a controlled amount of intervertebral motion (less than physiological, but more than fusion) to prevent increased stress on the adjacent segments (potentially preventing ASD) whilst still preventing neural recompression. Partial dynamic stabilisation is suitable for treating spinal instability after decompression as well as certain degenerative instabilities and chronic pain syndromes. Dynamic stabilisation and semi-rigid fixation systems for the spine are typically fixated posteriorly. However, choice of posterior surgical stabilisation techniques in the cervical spine is limited due to the size of the osseous material available for fixation and the close proximity of the neural structures and the vertebral artery. Posterior dynamic stabilisation systems for stabilisation of the lumbar spine often use the pedicle as an anchor point. Using the pedicle of the cervical spine as an anchor point is technically difficult because of its small size, angulation and proximity to neurovascular structures. Therefore, one of the main challenges to provide stabilisation in the cervical spine is the limitations of the anatomy. This presentation will introduce a novel spinal implant (patent pending) which is proposed for the cervical spine to provide partial dynamic stabilisation in the C3 to T1 region from a posterior approach. The implant is a single unit with a safe and technically simple insertion technique into the lateral masses. The implant uses a simple mechanism to allow limited intervertebral motion at each instrumented level. It is hoped that the simplicity of the device and removing the need to provide a bone graft anteriorly may reduce the cost of the procedure compared to traditional fusion and competing surgeries

Cervical spine collars are applied in trauma situations to immobilise patients' cervical spines. Whilst movement of the cervical spine following the application of a collar has been well documented, the movement in the cervical spine during the application of a collar has not been. There is universal agreement that C-spine collars should be applied to patients involved in high speed trauma, but there is no consensus as to the best method of application. The clinical authors have been shown two different techniques on how to apply the C-spine collars in their Advanced Life Support Training (ATLS). One technique is the same as that recommended by the Laerdal Company (Laerdal Medical Ltd, Kent) that manufactures the cervical spine collar that we looked at. The other technique was refined by a Neurosurgeon with an interest in pre-hospital care. In both techniques the subjects' head is immobilised by an assistant whilst the collar is applied. We aimed to quantify which of these techniques caused the least movement to the cervical spine. There is no evidence in the literature quantifying how much movement in any plane in the unstable cervical spine is safe. Therefore, we worked on the principle: the less movement the better. The Qualisys Motion Capture System (Qualisys AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) was used to create an environment that would measure movement on the neck during collar application. This system consisted of cameras that were pre-positioned in a set order determined by trial and error initially. These cameras captured reflected infra-red light from markers placed on anatomically defined points on the subject's body. As the position of the cameras was fixed then as the patients moved the markers through space, a software package could deduce the relative movement of the markers to each camera with 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF). Six healthy volunteers (3 M, 3 F; age 21-29) with no prior neck injuries acted as subjects. The collar was always applied by the same person. Each technique was used 3 times on each subject. To replicate the clinical situation another volunteer would hold the head for each test. The movements we measured were along the x, y, and z axes, thus acting as an approximation to flexion, extension and rotation occurring at the C-spine during collar application. The average movement in each axis (x, y and z) was 8 degrees, 8 degrees and 5 degrees respectively for both techniques. No further data analysis was attempted on this small data set. However this pilot study shows that our method enables researchers to reproducibly collect data about cervical spine movement whilst applying a cervical collar

We analysed the morbidity, mortality and outcome of cervical spine injuries in patients over the age of 65 years in a retrospective review of 107 elderly patients admitted to our tertiary referral spinal injuries unit with cervical spine injuries between 1994 and 2002. The data were acquired by analysis of the national spinal unit database, hospital inpatient enquiry (HIPE) system, chart and radiographic review. Mean age was 74 years (range 66-93yrs). The male to female ratio was 2.1: 1(M=72, F=35). The mean follow-up was 4.4 years (1-9 years) and mean in-hospital stay was 10 days. The mechanism of injury was a fall in 75 and a road traffic accident (RTA) in the remaining 32 patients. The overall complication rate was 18.6% with an associated in-hospital mortality of 11.2%. Outcome was assessed using the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire (CSOQ) from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Functional outcome scores approached pre-morbid level in almost all patients. Functional disability was more marked in the patients with neurological deficit at the time of injury. Outcome of the injury is related to the increasing age, co-morbidity and the severity of the neurological deficit. Injuries of the cervical spine are a not infrequent occurrence in the elderly and occur with relatively minor trauma. Neck pain in the elderly patient should be thoroughly evaluated to exclude C2 injuries. Most patients can be managed in an orthosis but unstable injuries require rigid external immobilisation

Purpose. Patient expectations influence post-treatment outcomes, both surgical and non-surgical. Existing studies evaluate the technical aspects of interventions and functional outcomes but fail to take into account patient expectations. This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multi-center data aims to explore the relationship between pre-operative expectations and post-operative outcomes and satisfaction in lumbar and cervical spine surgery. The authors hypothesized that expectations dramatically affect spine patient satisfaction independent of functional outcomes. Method. Patient data from lumbar and cervical spine patients collected prospectively using a patient health survey system was analyzed. The study included patients who underwent operative intervention (decompression with or without fusion) with at least a 3-month period of follow-up. Pre-operative expectations were measured using the MODEMS expectation survey. Post-operative satisfaction and fulfillment of expectations were measured using the MODEMS satisfaction survey. Post-operative functional outcomes were measured using the ODI and SF-36. Multi-variate ordinal logistic regression modeling was used to examine predictors of post-operative satisfaction. Multi-variate linear regression modeling was used to examine predictors of functional outcomes. Results. 402 patients were included in the study. Significant predictors of increased satisfaction include: higher fulfillment of expectations regarding work (p=0.003) and pain relief (p=0.008), greater post-operative SF-36 (p=0.04), and lower pre-operative expectations regarding ability to exercise (p=0.03). Lumbar spine patients were more satisfied than cervical-spine patients. Significant predictors of better post-operative function include: higher expectations regarding sleep (p<0.0002), fulfillment of expectations regarding work (p<0.0001), sleep (p=0.03), and daily activities (p=0.02). Cervical spine patients had better functional outcomes (p=0.006). Conclusion. This study showed that pre-operative expectations and their fulfillment influence post-operative satisfaction in lumbar and cervical spine patients. This underlines the importance of taking pre-operative expectations into account in order to obtain an informed choice based on patient preferences

Aim

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis remains a therapeutic challenge, as demonstrated by divergent treatment guidelines. The combination of moxifloxacin and rifampicin may be an attractive treatment option for cases caused by staphylococci; however, previous studies have reported a reduction in plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin when co-administered with rifampicin. The magnitude of this reduction in spinal tissues is not known. We aimed to investigate the interaction of rifampicin on moxifloxacin tissue concentrations in vertebral cancellous bone, intervertebral disc and subcutaneous adipose tissue in steady-state conditions using microdialysis in a porcine model.

Aims

Vancomycin may be an important drug for intravenous perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in spine surgery. We assessed single-dose vancomycin intervertebral disc, vertebral cancellous bone, and subcutaneous adipose tissue concentrations using microdialysis in a pig model.

Introduction

Recently ventral plating implants made of carbon/PEEK composite material have been developed with apparently superior material properties in terms of implant fatigue and imaging suitability. In this study we assessed the outcome of the first clinical application of this new implant.

Purpose of Study

Debate exists in the literature about the surgical management of sub-axial cervical burst fractures regarding the approach and types of fixation of these injuries. Our Acute Spinal Injury (ASCI) unit prefers anterior only cervical corpectomy and plate fixation in the management of these injuries. The objective of this study was to radiologically assess the long term outcomes (minimum 2 yrs) of our series.

Purpose

To determine whether MRI done prior to reduction altered the surgeon's choice of reduction method.

Existing techniques of posterior multi-point C1/2 stabilisation are technically demanding and can be hazardous. The coauthors have recently reported successful atlantoaxial fusion using a novel C1/2 stabilisation technique employing C1 multi-axial posterior arch screws (MA-PAS) in a clinical series of three patients where anatomical anomalies precluded established techniques.

The technically less demanding nature of this new technique, and possible wider application in patients with normal anatomy, led the authors to investigate its biomechanical stability compared to other established techniques.

Twenty-four human fresh-frozen cadaveric spines were harvested C0-C5. Motion was restricted to between C0 and C4. Each spine was non-destructively tested in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, firstly in the intact state and then after Type 2 odontoid fracture destabilisation and insertion of Magerl-Gallie, Unicortical Harms, Bicortical Harms or MA-PAS instrumentation. ROM between C1 and C2 was monitored using two digital cameras. Results for each technique were compared statistically compared using ANOVA.

The C1-C2 joint of the intact spines demonstrated high flexibility in flexion/extension (16.5deg). After instrumentation all specimens showed significantly reduced ROM in flexion/extension (Magerl-Gallie FE = 4.2deg, Unicort Harms FE = 7.2deg, Bicort Harms FE = 4.4deg). Lateral bend ROM of instrumented specimens (Magerl-Gallie LB =3.8deg, Unicort Harms LB = 3.8deg, Bicort Harms LB =2.3 deg) was, however, similar or slightly greater than intact (2.7 deg) . MA-PAS showed similar ROM in flexion/extension (4.2 deg) as the Magerl-Gallie and Harms techniques but was slightly higher in lateral bend (5.3 deg).

The MA-PAS technique was shown to have similar biomechanical stability to the Magerl-Gallie and Harms techniques. Given the demonstrated biomechanical stability of the MA-PAS technique, it may be a suitable alternative to the existing technically demanding, and possibly more hazardous, multi-point fixation techniques in patients with normal, as well as anomalous, C1/2 segmental anatomy.

The best algorithm, measurements, and criteria for screening children with Down syndrome for upper cervical instability are controversial. Many authors have recommended obtaining flexion and extension views. We noted that patients who require surgical stabilization due to myelopathy or cord compression typically have grossly abnormal radiographic measurements on the neutral upright lateral cervical spine radiograph (NUL). This study was designed to determine whether a full series of cervical spine images including flexion/extension lateral radiographs (FEL) was important to avoid missing upper cervical instability. This is a retrospective evaluation of cervical spine images obtained between 2006 and 2012 for the purposes of “screening” children with Down syndrome for evidence of instability. The atlanto-dental interval, space available for cord, and basion axial interval were measured on all films. The Weisel-Rothman measurement was made in the FEL series. Clinical outcome of those with abnormal measurements were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of NUL and FEL x-rays for identifying clinically significant cervical spine instability were calculated. Two-hundred and forty cervical spine series in 213 patients with Down syndrome between the ages of four months and 25 years were reviewed. One hundred and seventy-two children had a NUL view, and 88 of these patients also had FEL views. Only one of 88 patients was found to have an abnormal ADI (≥6mm), SAC (≤14mm), or BAI (>12mm) on an FEL series that did not have an abnormal measurement on the NUL. This patient had no evidence of cord compression or myelopathy. Obtaining a single NUL x-ray is an efficient method for radiographic screening of cervical spine instability. Further evaluation may be required if abnormal measurements are identified on the NUL x-ray. We also propose new “normal” values for the common radiographic measurements used in assessing risk of cervical spine instability in patients with Down syndrome

Cervical spinal arthrodesis is the standard of care for the treatment of spinal diseases induced neck pain. However, adjacent segment disease (ASD) is the primary postoperative complication, which draws great concerns. At present, controversy still exists for the etiology of ASD. Knowledge of cervical spinal loading pattern after cervical spinal arthrodesis is proposed to be the key to answer these questions. Musculoskeletal (MSK) multi-body dynamics (MBD) models have an opportunity to obtain spinal loading that is very difficult to directly measure in vivo. In present study, a previously validated cervical spine MSK MBD model was developed for simulating cervical spine after single-level anterior arthrodesis at C5-C6 disc level. In this cervical spine model, postoperative sagittal alignment and spine rhythms of each disc level, different from normal healthy subject, were both taken into account. Moreover, the biomechanical properties of facet joints of adjacent levels after anterior arthrodesis were modified according to the experimental results. Dynamic full range of motion (ROM) flexion/extension simulation was performed, where the motion data after arthrodesis was derived from published in-vivo kinematic observations. Meanwhile, the full ROM flexion/extension of normal subject was also simulated by the generic cervical spine model for comparative purpose. The intervertebral compressive and shear forces and loading-sharing distribution (the proportions of intervertebral compressive and shear force and facet joint force) at adjacent levels (C3-C4, C4-C5 and C6-C7 disc levels) were then predicted. By comparison, arthrodesis led to a significant increase of adjacent intervertebral compressive force during the head extension movement. Postoperative intervertebral compressive forces at adjacent levels increased by approximate 20% at the later stage of the head extension movement. However, there was no obvious alteration in adjacent intervertebral compressive force, during the head flexion movement. For the intervertebral shear forces in the anterior-posterior direction, no significant differences were found between the arthrodesis subject and normal subject, during the head flexion/extension movement. Meanwhile, cervical spinal loading-sharing distribution after anterior arthrodesis was altered compared with the normal subject's distribution, during the head extension movement. In the postoperative loading-sharing distribution, the percentage of intervertebral disc forces was further increased as the motion angle increased, compared with normal subject. In conclusion, cervical spinal loading after anterior arthrodesis was significantly increased at adjacent levels, during the head extension movement. Cervical spine musculoskeletal MBD model provides an attempt to comprehend postoperative ASD after anterior arthrodesis from a biomechanical perspective

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established spinal operation for cervical disc degeneration disease with neurological compromise. The procedure involves an anterior approach to the cervical spine with discectomy to relieve the pressure on the impinged spinal cord to slow disease progression. The prosthetic cage replaces the disc and can be inserted stand-alone or with an anterior plate that provides additional stability. The literature demonstrates that the cage-alone (CA) is given preference over the cage-plate (CP) technique due to better clinical outcomes, reduced operation time and resultant morbidity. This retrospective case-controlled study compared CA versus CP fixation used in single and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for myelopathy in a tertiary centre in Wales. A retrospective clinico-radiological analysis was undertaken, following ACDF procedures over seven years in a single tertiary centre. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age with cervical myelopathy who had at least six-month follow-up data. SPSS was used to identify any statistically significant difference between both groups. The data were analysed to evaluate the consistency of our findings in comparison to published literature. Eighty-six patients formed the study cohort; 28 [33%] underwent ACDF with CA and 58 [67%] with CP. The patient demographics were similar in both groups, and fusion was observed in all individuals. There was no statistical difference between the two constructs when assessing subsidence, clinical complication (dysphagia, dysphonia, infection), radiological parameters and reoperations. However, a more significant percentage [43% v 61%] of patients improved their cervical lordosis angle with CP treatment. Furthermore, the study yielded that surgery to upper cervical levels results in a higher incidence of dysphagia [65% v 35%]. Finally, bony growth across the cage was observed on X-ray in 12[43%] patients, a unique finding not mentioned in the literature previously. Our study demonstrates no overall difference between the two groups, and we recommend careful consideration of individual patient factors when deciding what construct to choose

Worldwide, most spine imaging is either “inappropriate” or “probably inappropriate”. The Choosing Wisely recommendation is “Do not perform imaging for lower back pain unless red flags are present.” There is currently no detailed breakdown of lower back pain diagnostic imaging performed in New Brunswick (NB) to inform future directions. A registry of spine imaging performed in NB from 2011-2019 inclusive (n=410,000) was transferred to the secure platform of the NB Institute for Data, Training and Research (NB-IRDT). The pseudonymized data included linkable institute identifiers derived from an obfuscated Medicare number, as well as information on type of imaging, location of imaging, and date of imaging. The transferred data did not include the radiology report or the test requisition. We included all lumbar, thoracic, and complete spine images. We excluded imaging related to the cervical spine, surgical or other procedures, out-of-province patients and imaging of patients under 19 years. We verified categories of X-ray, Computed Tomography (CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Red flags were identified by ICD-10 code-related criteria set out by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. We derived annual age- and sex-standardized rates of spine imaging per 100,000 population and examined regional variations in these rates in NB's two Regional Health Authorities (RHA-A and RHA-B). Age- and sex-standardized rates were derived for individuals with/without red flag conditions and by type of imaging. Healthcare utilization trends were reflected in hospital admissions and physician visits 2 years pre- and post-imaging. Rurality and socioeconomic status were derived using patients’ residences and income quintiles, respectively. Overall spine imaging rates in NB decreased between 2012 and 2019 by about 20% to 7,885 images per 100,000 people per year. This value may be higher than the Canadian average. Females had 23% higher average imaging rate than males. RHA-A had a 45% higher imaging rate than RHA-B. Imaging for red flag conditions accounted for about 20% of all imaging. X-rays imaging accounted for 67% and 75% of all imaging for RHA-A and RHA-B respectively. The proportions were 20% and 8% for CT and 13% and 17% for MRI. Two-year hospitalization rates and rates of physician visits were higher post-imaging. Females had higher age-standardized hospitalization and physician-visit rates, but the magnitude of increase was higher for males. Individuals with red flag conditions were associated with increased physician visits, regardless of the actual reason for the visit. Imaging rates were higher for rural than urban patients by about 26%. Individuals in the lowest income quintiles had higher imaging rates than those in the highest income quintiles. Physicians in RHA-A consistently ordered more images than their counterparts at RHA-B. We linked spine imaging data with population demographic data to look for variations in lumbar spine imaging patterns. In NB, as in other jurisdictions, imaging tests of the spine are occurring in large numbers. We determined that patterns of imaging far exceed the numbers expected for ‘red flag’ situations. Our findings will inform a focused approach in groups of interest. Implementing high value care recommendations pre-imaging ought to replace low-value routine imaging

Background. Surgical site infection following spine surgery is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and increased cost for the health care system. The reported pooled incidence is 3%. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is a key factor in lowering the risk of acquiring an infection. Previous studies have assessed perioperative cefuroxime concentrations in the anterior column of the cervical spine with an anterior surgical approach. However, the majority of surgeries are performed in the posterior column and often involve the lumbar spine. Accordingly, the objective was to compare the perioperative tissue concentrations of cefuroxime in the anterior and posterior column of the same lumbar vertebra using microdialysis in an experimental porcine model. Method. The lumbar vertebral column was exposed in 8 female pigs. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling in the anterior column (vertebral body) and posterior column (posterior arch) within the same vertebra (L5). Cefuroxime (1.5 g) was administered intravenously over 10 min. Microdialysates and plasma samples were continuously obtained over 8 hours. Cefuroxime concentrations were quantified by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Microdialysis is a catheter-based pharmacokinetic tool, that allows dynamic sampling of unbound and pharmacologic active fraction of drugs e.g., cefuroxime. The primary endpoint was the time with cefuroxime above the clinical breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) for Staphylococcus aureus of 4 µg/mL as this has been suggested as the best predictor of efficacy for cefuroxime. The secondary endpoint was tissue penetration (AUC. tissue. /AUC. plasma. ). Results. Mean T>MIC 4 µg/mL (95% confidence interval) was 123 min (105–141) in plasma, 97 min (79–115) in the anterior column and 93 min (75–111) in the posterior column. Tissue penetration (95% confidence interval) was incomplete for both the anterior column 0.48 (0.40–0.56) and posterior column 0.40 (0.33–0.48). Conclusions. Open lumbar spine surgery often involves extensive soft tissue dissection, stripping and retraction of the paraspinal muscles which may impair the local blood flow exposing the lumbar vertebra to postoperative infections. A single intravenous administration of 1.5 g cefuroxime resulted in comparable T>MIC between the anterior and posterior column of the lumbar spine. Mean cefuroxime concentrations decreased below the clinical breakpoint MIC for S. aureus of 4 µg/mL after 123 min (plasma), 97 min (anterior column) and 93 min (posterior column). This is shorter than the duration of most lumbar spine surgeries, and therefore alternative dosing regimens should be considered in posterior open lumbar spine surgeries lasting more than 1.5 hours