Introduction. Following National patient safety alert on cement use in hip fracture surgery, we investigated the incidence and pattern of 72 hours peri-operative mortality after hip fracture surgery in a District General Hospital. Methods. We reviewed all patients who had hip fracture surgery between 2005-April, 2010. We recorded demographic variables, type of fracture, implant used, medical co-morbidity, seniority of operating surgeon and anaesthetist, peri-operative haemodynamic status, time and cause of death. Results. Over a 64 month period 15 cases were identified. Peri-operative death (PAD) was 1% (15/1402). 4/15 patients died intra-operatively. PAD was highest following Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) implantation (5/85, 6%) and nil following Bipolar arthroplasty, Austin-Moore arthroplasty (AMA) or Cannulated screw fixation. PAD following total hip arthroplasty was 4% (1/25), Thompson's hemi-arthroplasty 2% (3/191), and Dynamic Hip Screw fixation 1% (6/695). Overall mortality after cemented implant was 2%. ETS implantation led to significantly increased peri-operative mortality compared to AMA (p=0.004). Operations were performed by both trainees (12) and Consultants (3). Both trainees (9) and Consultants (6) anaesthetised the patients. None of the patients belonged to ASA I or II (ASA III 6 and IV 9). All patients had significant cardio-vascular or pulmonary co-morbidity (Ca Lung 2, pulmonary fibrosis 1, end stage COAD 1, AF 6). Cemented implant insertion was followed by immediate haemodynamic collapse and death in 4/15, intra-operative haemodynamic instability in 1/15 and peri-operative instability in 5/15. Post-mortem was performed in 5/15: 2/5 were Pulmonary Embolism (PE), 2/5 bronchopneumonia and 1/5 Myocardial infarction (MI). 4/15 had suspected MI and 1/15 suspected PE. Conclusion. There was 1% risk of peri-operative death after hip fracture surgery. This risk was increased following cemented hemiarthroplasty and highest after ETS implantation. Risk was exacerbated in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular morbidity and independent of the seniority of the surgeon or the anaesthetist

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume. This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161. Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume. This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161. Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in geriatric and/or multimorbid patients is an enormous challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Revision procedures have also been demonstrated to expose patients to higher infection risks. Prior patient stratification according to presumed infection risks, followed by a more potent local antibiotic prophylaxis protocol with selective use of DALBC, is an interesting strategy to decrease the burden of PJI in high risk patients. The PubMed & EMBASE databases were screened for publications pertaining to the utilization of DALBC in cement for infection prophylaxis & prosthesis fixation. 6 preclinical & 7 clinical studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria and were stratified by level of clinical evidence. Only those studies were considered which compared the PJI outcome in the DALBC vs the SALBC group. (1). DALBC have been shown to exert a much stronger and longer lasting inhibition of biofilm formation on many PJI relevant bacteria (gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens) than single gentamicin-only containing cements. (2). DALBC use (COPAL G+C) in the intervention arm of 7 clinical studies has led to a significant reduction of PJI cases in a) cemented hemiarthroplasty procedures (3 studies, evidence level I and III), in b) cemented septic revision surgeries (2 studies, evidence level III), in c) cemented aseptic knee revisions (1 study, evidence level III) and in d) cemented primary arthroplasties in multi-morbid patients (1 study, evidence level III-IV). These benefits were not associated with more systemic side effects or a higher prevalence of broad antimicrobial resistancies. Use of DALBC is likely to be more effective in preventing PJI in high risk patients. The preliminar findings so far may encourage clinicians to consolidate this hypothesis on a wider clinical range

NICE guidelines support the use of total hip replacement (THR) in preference to cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of fit and active elderly patients with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture. We hypothesized that not all patients eligible for a THR received one in our unit. We performed a prospective cohort study including all consecutive hip fracture patients admitted to our unit over a 6 month period. Case notes and data from the National Hip Fracture Database were evaluated. Patients were deemed suitable for a THR if they mobilised outdoors with a maximum of one stick, had an abbreviated mental test score of 8 or greater and had an ASA score of 1 or 2. 256 patients sustained a neck of femur fracture during the study period and 36 met the inclusion criteria. 26 (72%) had cemented hemiarthroplasties and 10 (22%) had a THR. THR rates varied with the day of surgery. At our unit we have a low rate of THR for patients who fulfil the NICE criteria for suitability, however it is around the national average. This could be improved upon by increasing the availability of surgeons who are able to perform THR, especially on weekends

Purpose. To observe the follow-up results of standard cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with double loop and tension band wiring technique for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Materials and Methods. From May 2000 to May 2006, 86 cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties were performed in elderly patients who had unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The mean age at the time of surgery was 82 years old. The average follow-up period were 5.3 years. We evaluated post-operative results after operation by clinical and radiographic methods. Results. Clinically, the final follow-up of Harrsi hip score was noted 79.2. The mean time needed for full weight bearing following surgery was 4.2 weeks and 82.5% of patients regained their preoperative ambulatory level. All patients achieved union in lesser trochanter fracuture, but great trochanter displacement were observed in 4 cases. There was one case of acetabular erosion. Post-operative superficial infections were found in 2 cases. 1 case with stem subsidence(<5 mm) showed satisfactory results without further subsidence in follow-ups. Conclusion. If we properly apply indications in technique with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture in elderly, we will achieve systematic postoperative rehabilitation, pain control and handy nursing which is its one of merits

Undisplaced or minimal displaced medial neck femoral fractures are treated with canulated screws either in young or in elderly patients with good functional capacity, without severe comorbidity and cognitive impairment. We also perform this procedure in patients with very low daily activities and affected by severe comorbidity, with the aim to reduce pain. We reserve total hip replacement in middle-advanced age, with good level of functional activity and adequate bone-stock. We use bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients that need early mobilization for the presence of comorbidities that could worsen. We prefer cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty, as it gives an optimal primary stability, without press-fit. We prefer to utilize bipolar hemiarthroplasty with memory shape stem F.G.L. (Fig.1) in high risk patients (ASA classification). In fact the use of cement prolongs duration of surgery and is associated with higher perioperative mortality from cardiopulmonary complications. This stem in its metaphyseal region has 10 tabs, made of a Nitinol alloy (Ni-Ti). The feature of this alloy is to enlarge when brought to a certain temperature. When F.G.L. stem is mantained at 4° - 7° C the Nitinol (r) tabs are in the “restrained” configuration. Just at the time of surgery procedure, the stem is taken out of the refrigerator and inserted into the femoral diaphysis. At corporeal temperature, the Nitinol tabs enlarge, compressing the metaphyseal cancellous femoral region and give an immediate primary stability. We report clinical and radiological results of 15 patients (mean follow-up: 8 months) that underwent surgical procedure of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with F.G.L. stem in our department from March 2008 to December 2009. We had no perioperative complications and the results overlapped those of patients that underwent standard cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. The advantage of the use of F.G.L. stem is that it allows an immediate primary stability without searching an extreme press-fit. The disadvantage is the higher cost respect a standard cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Therefore its use should be limited to those patients in which the surgery time must be contained for severe comorbidity, or in patients in which specific cardio-pulmonary complaints make dangerous the use of cement

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing either total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty for intra-capsular neck of femur fractures between April 2013 and April 2014; identified from entries into the National Hip Fracture Database. PACS and the electronic database encompassing operation notes and discharge summaries were reviewed. 309 patients were identified, 3 of whom fractured both hips during the study period giving a total of 312 operations. The age range was 46 to 102 with a mean age of 82. 59 cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties, 143 cemented unipolar hemiarthroplasties, 2 uncemented hemiarthroplasties and 108 total hip replacements were performed. 10 patients required further operations. There have been 5 dislocations: 2 underwent MUA only, 2 treated by excision arthroplasty and 1 converted to THR. 1 patient developed a haematoma requiring wound washout. There were 4 wound infections - 1 treated by a washout, 2 by excision arthroplasty and one patient has undergone first stage revision; an overall reoperation rate of 3.2% comparing well with data published elsewhere

Introduction. Recurrent dislocation after hip arthroplasty is a difficult problem. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the results with the use of a constrained cup for treatment for instability after hip arthroplasty. Materials/Method. A prospective database of 30 patients who underwent revision hip surgery for dislocation of hip arthroplasty was kept with the surgeries taking place between Nov 2005 to Feb 2010. Results. The mean age of the cohort was 76.5 years (53–93 years) with 17 female and 13 male patients. The gap between primary hip surgery and constrained cup ranged from 1 week to 21 years. The follow-up ranged from 8 months to 62 months with an average of 31 months. The primary surgery was a total hip arthroplasty in 27 patients and cemented hemiarthroplasty in 3 patients. Femoral component revision was done in 6 patients. At latest clinical follow-up 16 patients were mobilising unaided and 6 needed some support. Post-operative complications included capture cup pullout from the sidewall of the pelvis in the first week post op. Infection complicated 2 patients with one patient ending up having a girdlestone type excision and the other treated with antibiotic suppression. One patient had post op problems of wound dehiscence treated with VAC therapy. Conclusion. This is a useful technique for a difficult management problem

Hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral fixation are common procedures performed in trauma units, but there is very little information regarding post-operative pain experience. Pain control is a keystone in the successful management of hip fractures. A sound strategy of pain management is easier to implement in patients where pain levels can be predicted, allowing for an effective balanced analgesic regime. Analysis was performed on patients presenting with a hip fracture in two hospitals. Patients with a diagnosis of dementia were excluded. Post-operative pain scores were taken from patient observation charts using a verbal analogue scale. Post-operative opiate consumption was calculated from inpatient drug charts. 357 patients were included, 205 patients underwent a cemented hemiarthroplasty (HG) and 152 had fixation with a dynamic hip screw (DG). No significant difference was found in the length of hospital stay. HG patients recorded a mean morphine requirement of 20.2mg compared with 40.3mg for the DG group. Although the early pain score difference was significant (p=0.009), after 4 days, the scores were equivalent. This may support the notion of non-surgical factors determining the total length of hospital stay. The reason for the elevated pain scores and higher morphine requirement in the DHS group remains unclear. One theory is the fracture site still exists, and it is possible that pre-existing hip arthritis may continue to be symptomatic. It is important to recognise the difference in pain experienced between the groups and analgesia should be tailored towards the individual, allowing for improved peri-operative surgical care and patient experience

The two commonest types of hemiarthroplasty used for the treatment of a displaced intracapsular fracture are the uncemented Austin Moore Prosthesis and cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasty. To determine if any difference in outcome exists between these implants we undertook a prospective randomised controlled trial of 300 patients with a displaced intracapsular hip fractures. All operations were performed or supervised by one orthopaedic surgeon and all by a standard anterolateral approach. Patients were followed by a nurse blinded in the type of prosthesis to assess residual pain and mobility. The average age of the patients was 83 years and 23% were male. 73% came from their own home with the remainder from institutional care. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups, with 34/151 having died at one year in the cemented group and 45/149 in the uncemented group. Pain scores (grade 1-6) were less for those treated by a cemented prosthesis (mean score 1.8 versus 2.4, p value <0.00001). Mobility change was also less for those treated with a cemented implant (p=0002). No difference was found in hospital stay. Operative complications are as listed. One case of non-fatal intraoperative cardiac arrest occurred in the cemented group. In summary a cemented Thompson Hemiarthroplasty causes less pain and less deterioration in mobility compared to uncemented Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty, without any increase in complications. The continued use of an uncemented Austin Moore cannot be recommended

Current evidence suggests that we should be moving away from Thompson's hemiarthroplasties for patients with intracapsular hip fractures. Furthermore, the use of cement when inserting these prostheses is controversial. This study aims to show the Inverness experience. We performed a retrospective review of all NHS Highland patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular neck of femur fracture over the last 15 years. Demographics and the use of cement were documented. Further analysis of this group was performed to identify any of these patients who required revision of their prosthesis. Patients requiring revision had their case-notes reviewed to identify the cause for further surgery. From 1996 until present 2221 patients from the Highland area had a hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular neck of femur fracture. 1708 where female (77%) and 513 male (23%). The ages ranged from 28 years to 104 years (mean 80 years, median 81). 2180 of this group had their operations in Raigmore Hospital with the remaining 41 at various centres throughout Scotland. 623 (28%)had a cemented hemiarthroplasty, with the remaining 1578 (72%) having an uncemented Thompson's hemiarthroplasty. The revision rate for the cemented group was 2% (13 of 623 patients). In the uncemented group it was 0.4% (6 of 1578). Reasons from revision included dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, infection and pain. Current evidence from some joint registers regarding the use of Thompson's hemiarthroplasty in the elderly is discouraging. The use of bone cement in this group with multiple co-morbidities is not without it's risks. Our data suggests that uncemented Thompson's hemiarthroplasties in low demand elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities can yield excellent results with less risk to the patients

Geriatric hip fracture patients have a 14-fold higher 30-day mortality than their age matched peers. Up to 50% of these patients receive blood transfusion perioperatively. Both restrictive and liberal transfusion policies are controversial in this population. Aim: The longitudinal description of transfusion practice in geriatric hip fracture patients in a major trauma centre. An 8-year (2002–2009) retrospective study was performed on patients over the age of 65 undergoing hip fracture fixation. Yearly transfusion rate; the influence of transfusion on 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality and length of stay (LOS) was investigated. On admission haemoglobin (Hb), pre-transfusion Hb and post-transfusion Hb and their effect on transfusion requirement and mortality was also reviewed. The yearly changes in on-admission and pre-transfusion Hb were also examined. The influence of comorbidities, timing, procedure performed and operation duration on transfusion requirement and mortality was also studied. From the 3412 patients, 35% (1195) received transfusion during their hospital stay. There was no change in age, gender and co-morbidities during the study. Thirty-day mortality improved from 12.4% in 2002 to 7% in 2009. The transfusion rate showed a gradual decrease from the highest of 48.3% (2003) to 22.9% (2009) (Pearson correlation - R2 = −0.707, p=0.05). There was no change during the study period in on-admission and pre-transfusion Hb. The mortality for non-transfused and transfused patients was [9.6% vs. 10.3 % (30-day)], [17.2% vs. 18.4%(90-day)] and [27% vs. 30.5%(1-year), p=0.031]. LOS was 11±9 for non-transfused patients and 13±10 (p<0.001) for transfused patients. Patients with more comorbidities experienced a higher transfusion rate, (0 – 31%, 1 – 38%, 2 – 46%, 3 – 57%), (Pearson Chi-squared, p<0.001). The need for transfusion by different procedures in decreasing order was 47.6% intramedullary device, 44.0% DHS, 25.2% cemented hemiarthroplasty, 23.6% Austin-Moore, and 5.5% cannulated screws. The length of the operation increases the chance of transfusion (<1hrs, – 33%, 1–2hrs – 35%, 2–3hrs – 41%, >3 hours – 65%), (Pearson Chi-squared, p=0.010). Preoperative waiting time had no influence on transfusion frequency (<24hrs – 36%, 24–48hrs – 34%, 48–96hrs – 36%, >96hrs – 33%), (Pearson Chi-squared, p=0.823). The percentage of transfused geriatric hip fracture patients halved during the eight-year period without changes in demographics and co-morbidities. Perioperative transfusion of hip fracture patients is associated with higher 1-year mortality and increased LOS. A more restrictive transfusion practice has been safe and may be a factor in the improved 30-day mortality

Introduction & aims. Geriatric hip fractures are a challenging clinical problem throughout the world. Hip fracture services have been shown to shorten time to surgery, decrease the cost of admissions, and improve the outcomes. We instituted a geriatric hip fracture program for co management of these injuries by orthopedic and internal medicine teams at our hospital in India. Method. From January 2010 till December 2011, 119 patients with a femoral neck fracture were treated with cemented modular hemiarthroplasty under this program using a cost-effective Indian implant. The cohort included 63 males and 56 females with a mean age of 70.7 years (range 55–98 years). Hypertension (n=42) and diabetes mellitus (n=29) were the most common co morbidities. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 37 months with an average of 24 months. Results. The surgery was performed within 24 hours of admission in 60.5% (n=72) patients. The use of anti platelet drugs was the most common reason for delay of surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.4 days (range 3–24 days) with 77% (n=92) of patients discharged within 1 week of admission. On follow-up, good to excellent Harris hip scores were seen in 88% of patients with 76% of patients returning to the pre injury ambulatory status. The mortality rate was 6% at 6 months follow-up and 10.9% at 2 years. Conclusions. Our study shows that a hip fracture program can be instituted in India. The program helped us in achieving the goal of early surgery, mobilization, and discharge from hospital with decreased mortality. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Literature suggests in senile IT fracture group with osteoporosis and comminution, the rates of complications are very high. Documented figures show 16% deaths in non-operative treatment and 16% (late) non-union IT fractures in non operative treatment. The post fixation re-operation rate is 23% after two to three years. High rate implant cutout, penetration and plate cutout leads to increased morbidity and mortality again. The aim of this study is to find out the results of primary prosthetic replacement in comminuted, osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Eight patients of the age group from 68 to 94 years (average 78.4) with four part fractures were operated primarily with bipolar hemiarthroplasty. They were operated by posterolateral approach and the hip joint was exposed through the fracture site itself. After pan release the proximal fragment was delivered and a modular locally manufactured cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty was performed. Due care was taken to restore offset, limb length and soft tissue balancing. The patients were mobile early after two days with walker and they became independent within four weeks after operation. They were followed up from six months to 3.5 years (average 2.1 years). The functional and radiological evaluation was done. There were five females and three males. The modified Charnley score improved from average 2.3 pre-operatively to an average of 5.2 with respect to pain, mobility and function. All the patients were happy and independent. One patient developed abductor lurch, but managed to carry out independently all her activities of daily living. One patient had a dislocation. This lady was very unco-operative and never helped in the rehabilitation programme. She lost to follow-up. Radiologically, there were no signs of loosening, progressive adiolucent lines, subsidence or osteolysis at the latest follow-up. Primary prosthetic hemi-replacement in cases of osteoporotic four part fractures in elderly patients helps early restoration of function and thereby prevents complications