Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 19 - 19
1 May 2015
Pease F Ward A Stevens A Cunningham J Sabri O Acharya M Chesser T
Full Access

Stable, anatomical fixation of acetabular fractures gives the best chance of a good outcome. We performed a biomechanical study to compare fracture stability and construct stiffness of three methods of fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures. Two-dimensional motion analysis was used to measure fracture fragment displacement and the construct stiffness for each fixation method was calculated from the force / displacement data. Following 2 cyclic loading protocols of 6000 cycles, to a maximum 1.5kN, the mean fracture displacement was 0.154mm for the rim plate model, 0.326mm for the buttress plate and 0.254mm for the spring plate model. Mean maximum displacement was significantly less for the rim plate fixation than the buttress plate (p=0.015) and spring plate fixation (p=0.02). The rim plate was the stiffest construct 10962N/mm (SD 3351.8), followed by the spring plate model 5637N/mm (SD 832.6) and the buttress plate model 4882N/mm (SD 387.3). Where possible a rim plate with inter-fragmentary lag screws should be used for isolated posterior wall fracture fixation as this is the most stable and stiffest construct. However, when this method is not possible, spring plate fixation is a safe and superior alternative to a posterior buttress plate method


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 76 - 76
1 Sep 2012
Lidder S Heidari N Grechenig W Clements H Tesch N Weinberg A
Full Access

Introduction. Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures account for 7 % of all proximal tibial fractures. Their fixation often requires posterolateral buttress plating. Approaches for the posterolateral corner are not extensile beyond the perforation of the anterior tibial artery through the interosseous membrane. This study aims to provide accurate data about the inferior limit of dissection by providing measurements of the anterior tibial artery from the lateral joint line as it pierces the interosseous membrane. Materials and Methods. Forty unpaired adult lower limbs cadavers were used. The posterolateral approach to the proximal tibia was performed as described by Frosch et al. Perpendicular measurements were made from the posterior limit of the articular surface of the lateral tibial plateau and fibula head to the perforation of the anterior tibial artery through the interosseous membrane. Results. The anterior tibial artery coursed through the interosseous membrane at 46.3 +/− 9.0 mm (range 27–62 mm) distal to the lateral tibial plateau and 35.7 +/− 9.0 mm (range 17–50 mm) distal to the fibula head. There was no significant difference between right or left sided knees. Discussion. This cadaveric study demonstrates the safe zone (min 27 mm, mean 45mm) up to which distal exposure can be performed for fracture manipulation and safe application of a buttress plate for displaced posterorlateral tibial plateau fractures. Evidence demonstrates quality of reduction correlates with clinical outcome and the surgeon can expect to be able to use a small fragment buttress plate of up to 45mm as this is the mean


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 153 - 153
1 Jan 2013
Lidder S Masterson S Grechenig S Heidari N Clements H Tesch P Grechenig W
Full Access

Introduction. Posterior malleolar fractures are present in up to 44% of all ankle fractures. Those involving > 25% of the articular surface have a higher rate of posterior ankle instability which may predispose to post traumatic arthritis. The posterolateral approach to the distal tibia allows direct reduction and stabilization of the posterior malleolus and concomitant lateral malleolus fractures. An anatomical study was performed to establish the safe zone of proximal dissection to avoid injury to the peroneal vessels in this uncommon approach. Methods. 26 unpaired adult lower limbs were dissected using the posterolateral approach to the distal tibia as described by Tornetta et al. The peroneal artery was identified coursing through the intraosseous membrane on deep dissestion as the flexor hallucis longus muscle was reflected medially. The level of its bifurcation was also noted over the tibia. Perpendicular measurements were made from the tibial plafond to these variable anatomical locations. Results. The peroneal artery bifurcated at 83+/−21 mm (41–115mm) proximal to the tibial plafond and perforated through the interossoeus membrane 64+/−18 mm (47–96mm) proximal to the tibial plafond. Conclusion. The safe zone for the posterolateral approach to the distal tibia is described. Caution is advised as the bifurcation and perforating artery may be as little as 41mm from the tibial plafond. This is important during deep dissection when the belly of the flexor hallucis longus muscle is reflected medially from the medial edge of the fibula. Once the peroneal artery was mobilized a buttress plate could easily be placed beneath it