Aim. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) aggravates an already difficult treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). The prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens varies across countries and increases over time. Regular monitoring of bacteriological analyses should be performed. Due to many factors influencing the AMR, the correct choice of antimicrobial management remains arguable. The primary purpose of this retrospective study was to identify and compare causative bacteria and to compare the incidence of antibiotic resistance between the septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and septic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Method. A review of all revision TKAs and revision THAs, undertaken between 2007 and 2020 in a tertiary referral centre, was performed. Included were cases meeting the consensus criteria for PJI, in which an organism has been identified. There were no major differences in tissue sampling between revision TKAs and revision THAs over time. Results. A total of 228 bacterial strains, isolated after revision TKA and THA, were analysed for their resistance to 20 different antibiotics. There was a statistically significant higher occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria (p=0.002) and Enterococcus species (p=0.026) identified after revision THAs compared to TKA. The comparison of antibiotic resistance between revision TKAs and revision THAs was statistically significant in 9 of 20 analysed antibiotics. Pathogens isolated after revision THA were much more resistant compared to pathogens isolated after revision TKA. Resistance in revision THAs was significantly higher to oxacillin (p=0.03), ciprofloxacin (p<0.001), levofloxacin (p<0.001), moxifloxacin (p=0.005), clindamycin (p<0.001), co-trimoxazole (p<0.001), imipenem (p=0.01), rifampicin (p=0.005) and tetracycline (p=0.009). There was no significantly higher resistance of pathogens isolated after revision TKAs detected. No statistically significant difference in antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria between revision TKA and revision THA was observed. Conclusions. The occurrence and the resistance of bacteria to antibiotics differs significantly between revision TKAs and revision THAs. This has implications on of the choice of empirical antibiotic in revision surgery as well as prophylactic antibiotic in primary surgery, depending on the joint that is to be replaced

Aims. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains the most severe complication of arthroplasty. Failure of intensive, long-term antibiotic treatment for PJI often requires removal of the implant. Antibiotic failure is thought to be caused by biofilm and persister formation. Novel anti-biofilm and anti-persister strategies are urgently needed. Here, we investigated the effects of several antimicrobial peptides on the bacteria within antibiotic-treated biofilms in an in vitro mature biofilm model on abiotic surfaces. Methods. On polystyrene, a mature (7 day-old) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilm was developed. Thereafter, bacteria in the biofilm were exposed to rifampicin and ciprofloxacin (both 10× >MIC) for three days. Surviving bacteria in the antibiotic-treated biofilm, presumed to include persisters, were exposed to increasing doses of the antimicrobial peptides SAAP-148, acyldepsipeptide 4 (ADEP4), LL-37 and pexiganan. SAAP-148 was further tested on antibiotic-treated mature biofilms on titanium/aluminium/niobium (TAN) discs and prosthetic joint liners. Results. Daily exposure of the mature biofilm for seven days with antibiotics resulted in a 4-log reduction of MRSA without elimination of the bacteria. The surviving bacteria within the biofilm were eliminated upon subsequent exposure to SAAP-148 and pexiganan but not with LL-37 ad ADEP4. Antibiotic treatment of mature biofilms on TAN discs followed by SAAP-148 also resulted in eradication of bacteria within the biofilm. SAAP-148 also fully eliminated bacteria within antibiotic-treated mature MRSA biofilms on an ex vivo liner of a prosthetic joint. Conclusions. A novel mature biofilm model has been developed in which the efficacy of antimicrobial peptides against bacteria, including persisters, residing within a biofilm was investigated. SAAP-148 and pexiganan were highly effective against the bacteria residing in antibiotic-exposed mature MRSA biofilms. This in vitro model system will be used to analyze the effects of novel antibiotic strategies and other anti-PJI agents

Aim. Septic arthritis (SA) is considered a medical emergency. The most common etiological agents are glucose consuming bacteria, so we evaluated the clinical utility of synovial fluid (SF) glucose levels and other biochemical parameters for supporting the diagnosis of the disease and their association with a positive bacteria culture and joint destruction. Methods. Adult patients with SA diagnose were enrolled prospectively between July 2018 and October 2019. As control group, adults with knee osteoarthritis, meniscus and/or knee ligaments lesions were enrolled. SF samples were obtained from the joints by arthrocentesis/arthrotomy. Microbiological analyses of SF were performed using Brucella broth blood culture flasks, samples were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO. 2. for 24 hours. Gram stain, chocolate and blood agar were used for the identification and growth of the bacteria. SF glucose levels, pH and leukocyte esterase were measured as biochemical parameters using a glucometer and colorimetric test strips. The Outerbridge classification was used for grading the osteochondral injury. Furthermore, blood samples were collected from patients and control subjects for determining glucose levels. Results. We included 8 subjects with knee ligaments lesions, 6 with meniscus lesions and 5 with osteoarthritis as control group, as well as 20 patients with SA diagnose. The mean age of the patients was 57.8 years with a 65% of male predominance. The most common affected joint was the knee (85%). SF culture was positive in 60% of the cases and the most common etiological agent was Staphylococcus aureus (58.3%). SF glucose levels from patients were lower than the controls (P=0.0018) and showed the lowest concentration in patients with a positive culture (P=0.0004). There was also a difference between blood and SF glucose concentration from the positive culture patients (P<0.0001). Leucocyte esterase presented the highest values in positive culture patients (P=<0.0001) and a more acidic pH was found compared to the control group (P<0.0001). Regarding the osteochondral injury, the lowest concentrations of SF glucose were found in patients with a higher grade in the classification (P = 0.0046). Conclusions. SF glucose and leukocyte esterase concentrations might be a quick and cheap useful parameter for the physician for distinguishing between bacterial infection and not infected joint. In addition, the lowest SF glucose levels might give information about the joint damage due to the disease

Aim. Currently, gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including multidrug-resistant (MDR-GNB) pathogens, are gaining importance in the aetiology of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). To characterize the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) causing hip prosthetic joint infections in elderly patients treated at a Brazilian tertiary academic hospital. Method. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients over 60 years of age undergoing hip arthroplasty from 2018 to 2023 at a tertiary academic trauma, which were diagnosed with hip prosthetic joint infection. PJI diagnosed was based on EBJIS criteria, in which intraoperative tissue cultures identified the pathogens. Demographics, reason for arthroplasty, type of implant and susceptibility patterns using disk diffusion method were analysed. Results. Overall, among 17 elderly patients diagnosed with hip infected arthroplasty, 45 bacterial isolated were identified. Debridement, irrigation, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR) procedures due to uncontrolled infection occurred in 47.0% (n=8/17), and five patients underwent more than two DAIR surgeries. Tissue cultures yielded eleven different bacterial species, with GNB accounted for 64.4% (n=29/45) of pathogens. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified in 34.5% (n=10/29), 17.25% (n=5/29), 13.8% (n=4/29), and 13.8% (n=4/29), respectively. In the resistance profile analysis, E. coli was most sensitive to antibiotics, whereas K. pneumoniae showed resistance rates higher than 70% for cephalosporins, carbapenems, and quinolones. All A. baumannii isolates were resistant to meropenem, and 80% of these isolates were resistant to amikacin. Conclusions. This study emphasizes the role of GNB in the microbiological profile of PJI among elderly patients at a tertiary hospital in a Brazilian centre. The present study portrays a worryingly higher rates of MDR-GNB, mainly to quinolones and cephalosporins resistance which have been the cornerstone of PJI antibiotic treatment. In addition, higher rates carbapenems and aminoglycosides resistance shows a threat to antibiotic treatment of PJI. More global studies need to be carried out to show a likely change in the microbial epidemiology of PJI

Title. Longitudinal Intravital Imaging to Quantify the “Race for the Surface” Between Host Immune Cell and Bacteria for Orthopaedic Implants with S. aureus Colonization in a Murine Model. Aim. To assess S. aureus vs. host cell colonization of contaminated implants vis intravital multiphoton laser scanning microscopy (IV-MLSM) in a murine model. Method. All animal experiments were approved by IACUC. A flat stainless steel or titanium L-shaped pin was contaminated with 10. 5. CFU of a red fluorescent protein (RFP) expressing strain of USA300LAC, and surgically implanted through the femur of global GFP-transgenic mice. IV-MLSM was performed at 2, 4, and 6 hours post-op. Parallel cross-sectional CFU studies were performed to quantify the bacteria load on the implant at 2,4,6,12,18 and 24 hours. Results. 1) We developed a high-fidelity reproducible IV-MLSM system to quantify S. aureus and host cell colonization of a bone implant in the mouse femur. Proper placement of all implants were confirmed with in vivo X-rays, and ex vivo photos. We empirically derive the ROI during each imaging session by aggregating the imaged volume which ranges from (636.4um × 636.4um × 151um) = 0.625 +/- 0.014 mm. 3. of bone marrow in a global GFP-transgenic mouse. 2) IV-MLSM imaging acquisition of the “race for the surface”.In vitro MPLSM images of implants partially coated with USA300LAC (RFP-MRSA) were verified by SEM image. Results from IV-MLSM of RFP-MRSA and GFP. +. host cell colonization of the contaminated implants illustrated the mutually exclusive surface coating at 3hrs, which to our knowledge is the first demonstration of “the race for the surface” between bacteria and host cells via intravital microscopy. 3) Quantifying the “race for the surface” with CFU verification of S. aureus on the implant. 3D volumetric rendering of the GFP. +. voxels and RFP+ voxels within the ROI were generated in Imaris. The voxel numbers suggeste that the fight for the surface concludes ∼3hrs post-infection, and then transitions to an aggressive MRSA proliferation phase. The results of WT control demonstrate a significant increase in CFU by 12hrs post-op for both stainless steel (P<0.01) and titanium (P<0.01). Conclusions. We developed IV-MLSM to quantify the “Race for the Surface” between host cells and contaminating S. aureus in a murine femur implant model. This race is remarkably fast, as the implant surface is completely covered with 3hrs, peak bacterial growth on the implant occurs between 2 and 12 hours and is complete by 12hrs

Aim. Here we describe a cohort study to determine the performance of a commercially available Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)-kit on samples of 65 consecutive patients suspected of orthopedic implant associated infections (IAI). Culture is routinely used and has a high specificity and sensitivity but requires days to more than a week for slow growing bacteria. FISH results are available within 45–60 minutes and thus specific treatment can start immediately. In addition, previous antibiotic therapy may hinder culture while bacteria may still be detected by FISH. Method. The hemoFISH-kit from Miacom diagnostics (Dusseldorf, Germany) was used on a total of 82 joint aspirates, sonication fluids and tissue samples of 65 consecutive patients to detect and identify possible microorganisms. This FISH-kit contains a universal 16S rRNA probe and species-specific probes for bacteria commonly encountered in blood infections. FISH and culture were compared to the clinical definition of IAI. These definitions were based on the criteria described by Pro-Implant Foundation criteria for IAI after fracture fixation or prosthetic joint infection. If no criteria were described in the literature for a specific IAI then MSIS criteria were used. Results. FISH and culture was done in 33 plain tissue samples, 43 sonication fluid samples and 6 joint aspirates of 65 patients. Results are shown in table 1. In clinical infections FISH provided earlier results in 7 and 2 extra for culture-negative. In 5 IAI-negative cases FISH was false-positive. Conclusions. Faster diagnosis by FISH is appealing, however with a PPV of 64% the hemoFISH-kit is not accurate enough for clinical use. Also, blood and orthopedic infections have different common pathogens, therefor FISH could not identify all of the bacterial strains due to a lack of specific probes. An orthopedic FISH-kit could solve this problem

Aim. The risk of haematogenic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after dental procedures is discussed controversially. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated infections according to the origin of infection based on the natural habitat of the bacteria. We investigated the frequency of positive monomicrobial cultures involving bacteria from oral cavity in patients with suspected PJI compared to bone and joint infections without joint prosthesis. Method. In this retrospective study we included all patients with suspected PJI or bone and joint infection without endoprosthesis, hospitalized at our orthopaedic clinic from January 2009 through March 2014. Excluded were patients with superficial surgical site infections or missing data. Demographic, clinical and microbiological data were collected using a standardized case report form. Groups were compared regarding infections caused by oral bacteria. χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was employed for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Results. A total of 1673 patients were included, of whom 996 (60%) had a suspected PJI and 677 (40%) an osteoarticular infection without joint endoprosthesis (control group). In patients with suspected PJI the median age (standard deviation) was 67 (14) years; 407 (41%) were males. The anatomic location of the prosthesis was hip in 522 (52%) patients, knee in 437 (44%), megaprostheses in 14 (1%), shoulder in 8 (1%) and other endoprosthesis in 15 (2%) patients. In 437 (44%) of PJI cases pathogen(s) were detected, 271 (62%) were monomicrobial and 166 (38%) polymicrobial. Of 996 patients with suspected PJI, 2.4% (n = 24) had monomicrobial infections caused by bacteria belonging to the normal oral flora, predominantly oral streptococci (n = 21). In contrast, only 0.4% (n =3) of the control group without joint prosthesis had monomicrobial infections caused by oral bacteria. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002), whereas the patient age (p = 0.058) and the anatomic location of the joint prosthesis (p = 0.622) did not have any effect on the infections due to oral bacteria. Conclusions. The incidence of infections caused by oral bacteria was significantly higher in patients with endoprosthesis than in other osteoarticular infections (2.4% versus 0.4%). This finding indicates that joint prostheses are at risk of haematogenous PJI originating from oral cavity. Future prospective studies need to determine the exact risk of haematogenic PJI caused by oral bacteria, as well as the potential of preventing these infections by antibiotic prophylaxis

Correct diagnosis of infection is crucial for an adequate treatment of orthopedic implant-related infections. In the orthopedic field, infections can be difficult to diagnose(1). As a consequence, patients may suffer from an undiagnosed and untreated implant-related infection. To solve this problem, we are searching for a diagnostic method to detect these so-called low-grade infections. The technique fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can detect slow-growing and even dead bacteria. Further, as FISH results are available within an hour after tissue collection it is an ideal candidate for diagnostic purposes. AIM: to evaluate the FISH technique for its potential to detect and identify orthopedic infections. Sonication fluid (SF) was collected by sonicating retrieved implants(2) from 62 patients. All samples were subjected to bacterial culture for clinical diagnostics. In addition, a commercially available FISH kit (miacom diagnostics, Germany), specifically designed for blood analysis (hemoFISH Masterpanel), was used. The kit contained 16S rRNA probes (positive control), non-sense probes (negative control), probes for Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acetinobacter spp., and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. All FISH analyses were performed according to the protocol provided with the kit. Culture and FISH results were compared, considering culture as the gold standard. Culture resulted in 27 positive and 35 negative samples. Comparing FISH (16S rRNA probe) with culture, 24 samples tested true-positive and 32 samples true-negative. Furthermore, 3 samples tested false-negative and 3 samples false-positive. The species cultured with the highest incidence were Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis, both from 8 SF samples. As the kit did not contain a probe for Propionibacterium acnes, these strains were only detected by the 16S rRNA probe. In addition, the latter samples tested positive with the Staphylococcus spp. probe. Interestingly, 3 samples tested positive with FISH that were culture negative. This result could indicate a higher sensitivity for detection of bacteria with FISH than with culture. Before FISH can be used for diagnostic purposes, the technique needs to be optimized to prevent false-negative results, for use on other patient materials and for detection of bacterial strains relevant for the orthopedic field like Propionibacterium acnes. In conclusion, FISH holds promise to be used as a diagnostic tool for identifying orthopedic infections

Introduction. According to the Australian registry 2014, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the fourth important reason for revision of a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). PJI is frequently caused by commensal strains of the skin such as Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus epidermis. Deep infection is depending on many factors, such as implant surface chemical and physical behaviour, device design, host site, surgery and host response. Nevertheless, a lack of knowledge is seen concerning the specific effects of different surfaces on the biological response of different biomaterials. In addition, it is difficult to discriminate the material chemico-physical properties by the topological features, such as surface roughness. Indeed, it has been widely demonstrated that surface composition, electric charge, wettability and roughness of implant surfaces have a strong influence on their interactions with biological fluids and tissues. Therefore, also bearing surface properties can influence the incidence of PJI, just shown recently. Objectives. To verify the capability of ceramic bearings to reduce bacteria biofilm adhesion by means of their surface chemico-physical properties. Methods. The surface chemico-physical properties of the most common materials in THA as monolithic alumina, zirconia platelet toughened alumina (ZPTA), zirconia (TZP), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), stainless-steel and cobalt alloy (Co28Cr6Mo) were compared. All materials were characterized using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), fourier transform spectroscopy (FTIR), x-ray diffraction (XRD) and zeta-potential. Additionaly wettability by contact angle measurement with various media as simulated body fluid (SBF), bacterial broth, cell culture media and fetal bovine serum (FBS) was determined. Furthermore, the surface protein adsorption amount was evaluated by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay analysis using FBS as protein source. Selective protein adsorption was also evaluated by electroforetic technique. The specimens' surface anti-bacterial adhesion activity was evaluated by Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation after 24h by colonies forming units count. Cytocompatibility was assessed using human primary osteoblasts cell culture and MTT assay. Results. The surface of all tested materials was found to be electronegative at physiological pH by means of zeta-potential measurement. Nevertheless, monolithic alumina and ZPTA have the isolectric point at lower pHs and adsorbed a larger amount of proteins (albumin and fibronectin) in comparison with metal surfaces. Such feature might be correlated with bacteria biofilm growth, since the ceramic surfaces were also less colonized by Staphylococcus aureus in comparison to metal surfaces (p<0.005) while they maintained the ability to promote osteoblasts adhesion and proliferation. The above results were confirmed by XPS technique where the ceramic surfaces had less hydroxyl groups and consequently were less prone to adhere with biological species as the bacteria. No correlation was observed using the FTIR and XRD surface characterization techniques. Conclusions. The ceramic bearing surfaces were found to reduce the bacteria biofilm adhesion, because of their surface chemico-physical properties

The role of biofilm in pathogenesis of several chronic human infections is widely accepted, as this structure leads pathogens to persist among the human body, being protected from the action of antibacterial molecules and drugs (1). It has been estimated that up to 65% of bacterial infections are caused by microorganisms growing in biofilms (2). Moreover, biofilm is involved in device-related orthopaedic bacterial infections, which are unaffected by vaccines and antibiotic therapies, constituting a serious problem for the human health care.

The aim of the present work was to evaluate the anti-biofilm action of a selected and patented lactobacillus strain (MD1) supernatant, both on the in-formation- biofilm and on mature biofilm produced by pathogenic bacteria.

MD1 was grown in BHI for 48 h at 37°C. After incubation, the sample was centrifuged for 5’ for 14,000 × g and the supernatant previously filtered and treated in order to obtain the anti-biofilm compounds (Special Supernatant – SS) was collected. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were grown in BHI for 24h at 37°C. The anti-biofilm ability of the tested SS – lactobacillus strain was evaluated by a spectrophotometric method according to Christensen at al., following the incubation of pathogens and the “mature biofilm” with the lactobacillus supernatant. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy was used to confirm the data obtained from Crystal Violet Assay.

After the incubation of the SS with pathogens and mature biofilm, the formation of biofilm was inhibited and a significant disruption of the mature biofilm was observed. Interestingly, the same properties were observed also when the SS pH was neutralized to pH 6.5. In particular, the reduction of biofilm production and the disruption of mature biofilm was about 50–70% for all microorganisms.

The SS lactobacillus strain MD1 exhibited a relevant antibiofilm action against mature and in-formation-biofilm produced by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa strains tested in the study. Moreover, the antibiofilm action has been observed to be pH-independent, as when the supernatant was neutralized to pH 6.5, the reduction of pathogenic biofilm has been still observed. These promising results highlighted the possibility to use this SS-lactobacillus anti-biofilm property to develop a cost-effective and safety treatment able to reduce the impact of pathogenic biofilm on device-related orthopaedic bacterial infections.

Aim. Compare clinical outcomes following staged revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) secondary to either multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria or non-MDR (NMDR) bacteria. Method. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected bone infection database. Adult patients diagnosed and treated for hip or knee PJI, between January 2011 and December 2014, with minimum one-year follow-up, were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: MDR group (defined as resistance to 3 or more classes) and N-MDR group (defined as acquired resistance to two classes of antibiotic or less). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to stratify patients into low, medium and high risk. The diagnosis of PJI, and any recurrence following treatment, was made in accordance with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Failure was defined as recurrence of infection necessitating implant removal, excision arthroplasty, arthrodesis or amputation. Results. The study population comprised 240 patients. 74 (31%) had an MDR infection. 14 patients were deceased at the time of data capture. All infections were treated by staged revision with interval antibiotic space and targeted systemic antibiotics under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team. Total number of failures in both groups was 39 (16%), 15 hips (12%) and 24 knees (21%). There were significantly more failures in the MDR group (n=24, 32%) than the non-MDR group (n=15, 9%)(p<0.0001). Using the Charlson Comorbidity Index within the N-MDR group there was no significant difference in outcomes between the low and medium groups (p=0.352), the low and high risk groups (p=1.000) and the high and medium risk groups (p=1.000). There was no statistically significant association discerned within the MDR group based on co-morbidity also. (p values = 0.1702, 0.665 and 0.1096 respectively). When comparing all cases, there was a statistically significantly higher rate of failure in patients with polymicrobial infection versus single organism infection (P<0.0001). When stratifying by the presence of an MDR organism versus an N-MDR organism, both polymicrobial sub groups showed a greater rate of failure than their single organism counterparts, however this was only significant in the MDR group and not the N-MDR group (p=0.0007 vs p=0.123). Furthermore the polymicrobial MDR group showed a statistically significant higher rate of failure versus the polymicrobial N-MDR group (p=0.002). Conclusions. The study suggests that the presence of an MDR organism may be a predictor of failure, independent of patient co-morbidity, in staged revision hip and knee arthroplasty for PJI

Aim. To test the hypothesis that surface skin swabs taken after skin preparation with alcoholic povidone iodine (APVPI) would not grow bacteria, whereas full thickness biopsies taken from the line of surgical incision would grow bacteria. Method. Informed consent was obtained from 44 patients undergoing primary hip (n=13) and knee (n=31) arthroplasty. Each received antimicrobial prophylaxis before skin preparation with APVPI under laminar flow. After the APVPI had dried, a skin swab and a full thickness 8mm x 4mm elliptical skin biopsy were taken from the line of incision. The skin swab was rolled in 5mL anaerobe basal broth to inactivate the APVPI, incubated at 37 degrees and checked for growth for 2 weeks. One half of the skin biopsy was snap frozen and used for gram and nitroblue tetrazolium staining. The other half was placed into 5mL of anaerobe basal broth, incubated at 37 degrees and monitored for growth for 2 weeks. Results. Forty-four skin biopsy samples and 42 corresponding swabs were collected. Fourteen of 42 surface swabs were positive for bacteria (5 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 6 Propionibacteria acnes, 1 S. aureus, 1 S. capitis, 1 S. epidermidis and P. acnes, and 1 S. warneri and P. acnes). Fifteen of 44 skin biopsies were positive for bacteria (7 P. acnes, 3 S. epidermidis, 1 S. aureus, 1 S. capitis, 1 Psuedomonas spp, 1 P. acnes and S. epidermidis, 1 S. edidermidis and S. capitis). Gram positive bacteria were seen in all gram stained sections of skin and all sections of skin were positive for live bacteria when stained with nitroblue tetrazolium. Discussion. This study shows that skin preparation with APVPI does not completely remove viable bacteria from the skin. Surgeons need to be aware of this and to adapt their surgical technique to avoid coming into contact with the patient's skin, including cut edges, when performing surgery involving implants

Aim. Data on Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) or XDR (extensively drug resistant) Gram negative bacteria (GNB) are limited. Treatment options are also restricted. We conducted a multi-national, multi-center assessment of clinical data and factors of outcome for these infections. Method. PJI were defined upon international guidelines. Data from 2000–2015 on demographics, clinical features, microbiology, surgical treatment and antimicrobial therapy was collected retrospectively. Factors associated with treatment success were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Results. A total of 133 PJI were evaluated. Female (n=84, 61.4%) and the elderly [mean age (+/-SD) 73 (12.7)] predominated. Diabetes mellitus was the most frequent comorbidity (n=42,32.1%) followed by rheumatoid arthritis (n=14,10.7). Most PJI were early infections (84.4 %). XDR accounted for 23 cases; half of them due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Prevalence of MDR or XDR GNB was not different between early and late PJIs (p=0.114). Overall, P.aeruginosa (n=25, 19.1%) was followed by Klebsiella spp (n=23,17.6%) and Enterobacter spp (n=22,16.8%). PJI was located at the hip (n=85 65.6%), knee (n=41,31.3%), shoulder (n=3,2.3%) and ankle (n=1, 0.8%). Clinical characteristics included soft tissue infection (66.4%), pain (51.1%), fever (32.1%) and sinus tract(29.8%). Surgery for PJIs consisted of DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention), (n=64, 49.6%), followed by explantation of the arthroplasty (n=32, 24.8%), two-stage revision (n=16, 12,4%), one stage revision (n=9, 7%), arthrodesis (n=2, 1.6%). Median duration of antibiotic therapy was 51 days (IQR 25–75: 40–90 days). Cure after treatment was assessed in 78 patients (58.6%). No-DAIR surgical procedures in PJIs were more likely to be successful compared to DAIR surgery (75.8% vs 50%, OR 3.13, 95% CI:1.47–6.70, p=0.003)both in early or late infections. Conclusions. PJI by MDR/XDR GNB affects female, the elderly with comorbidities and previous surgery for PJI. P.aeruginosa is frequent, mostly XRD. No-DAIR procedures have higher probability of treatment success than DAIR even in early infection. Despite surgery and long-term antimicrobial administration, treatment success was less than 60%, probably reflecting the lack of effective treatment options

To prevent nosocomial transmission (NT) of multiresistent germs (MRG) the German Robert Koch Institute (RKI) recommends to isolate patients with MRG. At a so-called normal ward isolating patients is a challenging and stressful procedure for both patients and hospital staff. The present study proposes the hypothesis that, compared to normal wards, an isolation ward reduces the nosocomial infection rate. After an isolation ward with twelve beds has been established in 2005, patients with MRG on the wards of the department for spinal cord injury as well as on the isolation ward were monitored using a prospective screening and meeting the requirements of the RKI. Apart from detecting transmitter of MRG the NT of these bacteria was identified and registered between 2006 and 2013. The total length of a patients stay in the hospital, the number of isolation days and the rate of NTs were documented. The quotient of MRG load per ward and the number of NTs per ward were compared. In the investigation period of eight years 262175 patient days, 33416 isolation days and 33 transmissions were registered. On the spinal cord injury ward 223167 of the patient days, 1120 of the isolation days and 29 of the NTs were documented. On the isolation ward 39008 of the patient days and 32296 of the isolation days with four of the transmissions were registered. The mean load of MRG resulted from the quotient of the number of days with MRG per 100 patient days. The effective nosocomial frequency of transmission resulted from the quotient of the mean load of MRG to the number of transmissions. As a result, the frequency of transmission on the isolation ward was significantly lower (p=0,001) in comparison to the spinal cord injury ward. The presented results suggest that, despite multiple higher loads of MRG, constructional measures combined with contact isolation facilitate a reduction of NT rates of MRG. The reservation must be made, however, that in case of known MRG the screening was performed under isolation conditions, with unkown MRG without meeting requirements of isolation. The present comparison of NT rates on an isolation ward and a normal spinal cord injury ward emphasizes the importance and function of an isolation ward through constructional (physical) separation and pooling of professional competency for successful management of MRG in healthcare facilities

Aim. Orthopedic implants play a tremendous role in fixing bone damages due to aging as well as fractures. However, these implants tend to get colonized by bacteria on the surface, leading to infections and subsequently prevention of healing and osteointegration. Recently, Roupie et al. showed that a nisin layer-by-layer based coating applied on biomaterials has both osteogenic and antibacterial properties. The Galleria mellonella larva is a well-known insect infection model that has been used to test the virulence of bacterial and fungal strains as well as for the high throughput screening of antimicrobial compounds against infections. Recently, we have developed an insect infection model with G. mellonella larvae to study implant-associated biofilm infections using Kirschner (K)-wires as implant material. Here, we would like to test the antibacterial capacity of nisin layer-by-layer based coatings on K-wires against Staphylococcus aureus in the G. mellonella larva implant infection model. Method. Prior to the implantation procedure, G. mellonella larvae are maintained at room temperature on wheat germ in an incubator. The larvae received bare titanium K-wires (uncoated), or either control-coated or nisin-coated K-wires. After one hour, the larvae were injected with 5×10. 5. S. aureus bacteria per larva (i.e., hematogenous implant infection model). Next, the larvae were incubated at 37. o. C in an incubator and the survival of the larvae was monitored for five days. Moreover, the number of bacteria on the implant surface and in the surrounding tissue was determined after 24h of incubation. Further, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were performed to study the effect of nisin on biofilm formation. Results. The larvae receiving the nisin-coated K-wires showed significantly higher survival rates compared to uncoated titanium K-wires, although not when compared to control-coated K-wires. A more than 1-log reduction in number of bacteria on the implant surface and in the surrounding tissue was observed in larvae receiving the nisin-coated K-wires, when compared to uncoated titanium K-wires SEM analysis showed reduced colonization of the bacteria nisin-coated K-wires compared to the controls. Conclusions. In conclusion, the antimicrobial nisin layer-by-layer based coating applied on titanium surfaces is able to prevent implant-related S. aureus biofilm infection in G. mellonella and is a promising antimicrobial strategy to prevent implant-related infections

Most patients treated at our clinical setting present during chronic osteomyelitis stage, which is anecdotally likely to be poly-microbial. Adults with poly-microbial infection have a predilection for gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes, a scenario that hypothetically leads to a higher morbidity of poly-microbial osteomyelitis following trauma. Our study looks into the epidemiology of poly-microbial osteomyelitis treated at our Tumour and Infection unit. Retrospective study of patients treated for osteomyelitis from 2016 to 2020. Records of eligible patients were retrieved for examination. Demographics such as age, sex and race were recorded. Clinical presentation, organisms cultured, including their anti-microbial sensitivities were documented. There were 63 participants in the study. 31 (49.21%) had mono-microbial osteomyelitis with 32 (50.79%) having poly-microbial osteomyelitis. Majority of the poly-microbial patients presented with a sinus (68.75%) mostly located in the tibia (50%). Multiple mixed pathogens (both gam-positive and gram-negative) were cultured in our patients and this comprised 71.21% of the total bacteria cultured. Staphylococcus Aureus was the commonest bacteria (30%) isolated, followed by Enterococcus faecalis (12%). The commonest gram-negative bacteriae cultured was Enterococcus cloacae (10%) followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (7%). Most enterobacteriacae species were sensitive to Ertapenem and Ceftazidime. A slightly higher incidence of poly-microbial osteomyelitis was found in our study than that reported in literature. Furthermore, our study demonstrated a wide variety of organisms found in poly-microbial osteomyelitis, with a large contribution made by gram-negative anaerobic rod-shaped bacteria

Aim. Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are serious infections requiring early optimized antimicrobial therapy. BJIs can be polymicrobial or caused by fastidious bacteria, and the patient may have received antibiotics prior to sampling, which may decrease the sensitivity of culture-based diagnosis. Furthermore, culture-based diagnosis can take up to 14 days. Molecular approaches can be useful to overcome these concerns. The BioFire® system performs syndromic multiplex PCR in 1 hour, with only a few minutes of sample preparation. The BioFire® Joint Infection (JI) panel (BF-JI), recently FDA-cleared, detects both Gram-positive (n=15) and Gram-negative bacteria (n=14), Candida, and eight antibiotic resistance genes directly from synovial fluids. The aim of this study was to evaluate its performance in acute JIs in real-life conditions. Method. BF-JI was performed on synovial fluid from patients with clinical suspicion of acute JI, either septic arthritis or periprosthetic JI, in 6 French centers. The results of BF-JI were compared with the results of culture of synovial fluid and other concomitantly collected osteoarticular samples obtained in routine testing in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Results. From July 2021 to May 2022, 319 patients (including 10 children < 5y and 136 periprosthetic infections) had been included in the study. The BF-JI test was invalid for one patient (not retested). Among the 318 remaining patients, overall concordance with comparative microbiology methods was 88% (280/318): 131 samples were negative with both BF-JI and culture, and 149 samples were positive with the same microorganisms using complementary techniques. In 33 cases (10.4%), BF-JI was negative while culture was positive: 18 microorganisms were not targeted by BF-JI (including Staphylococcus epidermidis, n=10, and Cutibacterium acnes, n=2); 15 microorganisms targeted by BF-JI were obtained in culture but not by the molecular test (false-negative 4.7%). In 20 cases, BF-JI was positive while culture was not: 12 patients had received antibiotics before sampling, and 7 cases involved fragile and fastidious bacteria (Kingella kingae, n=5; Neisseria gonorrhoeae, n=2). In 6 cases, both BF-JI and culture were positive, but no yielding the same bacteria (polymicrobial specimens). Conclusions. In acute JIs, the BF-JI panel shows a good concordance with culture for the microorganisms targeted by the panel. Therefore, this molecular tool may have a place in microbiological diagnosis of acute JIs in order to confirm JI faster than culture. Moreover, it allows easy detection of difficult-to-culture bacteria. Acknowledgements. study was supported by bioMérieux, who provided all reagents

Aim. Rifampicin as a biofilm-active antibiotic drug has a significant role in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, rifampicin resistance is an increasing threat to PJI treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of rifampicin resistant staphylococci over time and its association with infection-free survival after PJI in a single centre in Sweden. Methods. We included 238 PJIs in 238 patients who had undergone PJI revision surgery from 2001 to 2020 on whom the causative bacteria were staphylococci, and the agent was tested for rifampicin resistance. Data regarding agents, rifampicin resistance, treatment and outcome was obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a Cox regression model with adjustment for age, sex, localisation (hip or knee) and type of prosthesis (primary or revision) were used to calculate infection-free survival rates and adjusted risk ratios (HRs) of the risk of treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as any reoperation or suppression treatment with antibiotics due to prolonged infection. Results. Among the included 238 PJIs, 40 rifampicin-resistant staphylococci [93% Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS)] and 29 treatment failures were identified. The proportion of rifampicin resistant agents decreased from 25% in 2010–2015 to 12% in 2016–2020. The 2-year infection-free survival rates were 79.0% (95% CI 0.66–0.92) for the rifampicin resistant and 90% (95% CI 0.86–0.94) for the rifampicin sensitive group. Patients with PJI caused by rifampicin resistant bacteria had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure than those caused by sensitive bacteria (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.0–6.2). Conclusions. The incidence of PJI caused by rifampicin resistant staphylococci decreased in Uppsala, Sweden over the past 20 years. PJI caused by rifampicin-resistant staphylococci has a two-fold risk for treatment failure compared to PJI caused by rifampicin-sensitive staphylococci, which stresses the importance of retaining rifampicin resistance low. Additionally, the increased risk of treatment failure when PJI is caused by a rifampicin-resistant bacteria warrants consideration of a more conservative treatment strategy

Background. Although described as a commensal bacterium with low pathogenicity, Cutibacterium acnes involvement has been reported in many clinical entities: infections associated with devices, such as shoulder prosthetic joint infections, osteosynthesis, breast implants or cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Various studies show that C. acnes grows as a biofilm, contributing to its persistence by allowing its escape from the action of the immune system and antibiotics. Purpose. Our aim was to assess the activity of different active substances (erythromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline and Myrtacine. ®. ) on eight different well-characterized C. acnes strains after growth in biofilm mode. Methods. Eight susceptible strains of C. acnes were selected for this study, including two reference strains (ATCC6919 and ATCC11827) and six clinical strains. All C. acnes strains were studied using two different methods to study the biofilm production at different time points: the BioFilm Ring Test. ®. technique (early stages of adhesion) and the Crystal Violet (CV) method (mature biofilm). In a second step, the impact of different active substances (erythromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline and Myrtacine. ®. ) was studied. For the CV technique, two types of tests were performed: preventive tests (addition of active substances and bacteria at the same time) and curative challenge tests (addition of active substances on a biofilm already formed after 48h). Transmission electron microscopy was performed to investigate the morphology modifications. Results. C. acnes isolates from phylotypes IA. 1. and IA. 2. , seem to produce more mature biofilm in the first stages of adhesion than other phylotypes. Curative assays were performed to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotics and Myrtacine. ®. on mature biofilm. Significant efficacy of Myrtacine. ®. at 0.03% was observed for C. acnes strains. Moreover, the combination of Myrtacine. ®. and doxycycline appears to decrease the total biofilm biomass. The effect of doxycycline as a preventive measure was minimal. On the contrary, a similar use of Myrtacine. ®. as early as 0.001% showed significant efficacy with a significant decrease in total biofilm biomass for all C. acnes strains. Transmission electron microscopy revealed a significantly decreased biofilm growth in treated bacteria with Myrtacine. ®. compared to untreated bacteria. Moreover, the total number of bacteria decreased as the concentration of Myrtacine. ®. increased suggesting also an antimicrobial effect. Conclusion. These results confirm the difference in biofilm producing ability depending on C. acnes phylotypes. These results suggest that Myrtacine. ®. may be a promising alternative antibacterial and anti-biofilm agent like peroxide de benzoyle to prevent shoulder prosthetic joint infection involving planktonic and biofilm C. acnes

Aim. The origin of surgical site and biomaterial-associated infection is still elusive. Microorganisms contaminating the wound may come from the air, the surgical team, or from the skin of the patient. Prior to surgery the skin of patients is disinfected, but bacteria deeper in the skin (e.g. in sweat glands or sebaceous glands), may not be reached. This study aims to assess a potential role of this intracutaneous bacterial reservoir in biomaterial-associated infection. Method. To study if cutaneous microbiota colonize the wound when released from the skin upon cutting, we isolated, quantified and identified aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from the skin of 99 patients undergoing trauma surgery, before and after skin disinfection, from the knife blades and from the wound directly after the first cut. Results. Ninety-nine percent of the patients were culture-positive before disinfection with chlorhexidine. Of these, 40% were still culture-positive after disinfection. Of these, 54% had a positive culture of the wound after the skin cut. Twenty percent of the patients with a negative culture after disinfection, nevertheless had a positive wound culture after cutting the skin. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Cutibacterium acnes were the most often cultured bacterial species. In 9%, more than 100 bacterial colonies were cultured from the wound, a dose that may cause biomaterial-associated infections. Conclusions. Bacteria residing in the skin and not eradicated by disinfection may enter the surgical wound upon cutting, resulting in contamination which may cause a biomaterial-associated infection. Use of two knifes likely reduces the risk of wound contamination