Abstract
Correct diagnosis of infection is crucial for an adequate treatment of orthopedic implant-related infections. In the orthopedic field, infections can be difficult to diagnose(1). As a consequence, patients may suffer from an undiagnosed and untreated implant-related infection.
To solve this problem, we are searching for a diagnostic method to detect these so-called low-grade infections. The technique fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can detect slow-growing and even dead bacteria. Further, as FISH results are available within an hour after tissue collection it is an ideal candidate for diagnostic purposes.
AIM: to evaluate the FISH technique for its potential to detect and identify orthopedic infections.
Sonication fluid (SF) was collected by sonicating retrieved implants(2) from 62 patients. All samples were subjected to bacterial culture for clinical diagnostics. In addition, a commercially available FISH kit (miacom diagnostics, Germany), specifically designed for blood analysis (hemoFISH Masterpanel), was used. The kit contained 16S rRNA probes (positive control), non-sense probes (negative control), probes for Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acetinobacter spp., and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. All FISH analyses were performed according to the protocol provided with the kit.
Culture and FISH results were compared, considering culture as the gold standard. Culture resulted in 27 positive and 35 negative samples. Comparing FISH (16S rRNA probe) with culture, 24 samples tested true-positive and 32 samples true-negative. Furthermore, 3 samples tested false-negative and 3 samples false-positive.
The species cultured with the highest incidence were Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis, both from 8 SF samples. As the kit did not contain a probe for Propionibacterium acnes, these strains were only detected by the 16S rRNA probe. In addition, the latter samples tested positive with the Staphylococcus spp. probe.
Interestingly, 3 samples tested positive with FISH that were culture negative. This result could indicate a higher sensitivity for detection of bacteria with FISH than with culture.
Before FISH can be used for diagnostic purposes, the technique needs to be optimized to prevent false-negative results, for use on other patient materials and for detection of bacterial strains relevant for the orthopedic field like Propionibacterium acnes.
In conclusion, FISH holds promise to be used as a diagnostic tool for identifying orthopedic infections.
