The rate of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is approximately 1%. As the number of THAs performed each year continue to increase (550,000 by 2030), a corresponding increase in the number of hip PJI cases is likely to occur. A chronic deep infection may be treated by either chronic suppression, irrigation and debridement, single-stage exchange, or two-stage exchange. In the United States, the gold standard for chronic PJI continues to be a two-stage exchange. The benefit of an antibiotic impregnated cement is that they produce higher local concentrations of antibiotics than systemic intravenous administration. Hip spacers may be either static or articulating. Static spacers are reserved for cases of massive acetabular bone loss in which an articulating spacer is not feasible. A static spacer consists of a block of antibiotic cement in the native acetabulum and antibiotic coated rod in the femoral canal. Limb shortening, loss of soft tissue planes, and disuse osteopenia and muscle atrophy are all limitations of static spacers. In contrast, articulating spacers fulfill the goals of the interim construct during two-stage exchange which is to enhance eradication of the infecting organism through drug elution, to maintain limb length, to facilitate exposure during revision surgery, and to improve functional mobilization. Articulating spacers may be divided into three general categories based on method of spacer creation: Handmade custom spacers, prefabricated spacers, custom molded spacers (hemiarthroplasty molds and molded stem with cemented all-polyethylene cup). Handmade custom spacers are usually created with K-wire or rush rods coated with antibiotic cement. Handmade spacers are relatively simple to make, they are economical, and the amount and type of antibiotics incorporated can be customised for the infecting organism. Commercially available hemiarthroplasty spacers can be either prefabricated (Spacer G, Exactech, Gainesville. FL) or made intraoperatively (Stage One, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) are available in several head and stem sizes. The advantage of prefabricated spacers is that they do not require additional time to mold in the operating room. The downside of prefabricated spacers is that the antibiotic concentration and type is predetermined. A custom molded stem with cemented all-polyethylene cup can be made with off the shelf implants or used as part of a commercially available spacer (PROSTALAC, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN). A common antibiotic/cement combination includes Tobramycin (3.6 g/40 g of cement) and vancomycin (1.5 g/40 g of cement). In all of these spacer constructs, the principles of using a high-elution cement mixed without a vacuum and with high doses of heat stable antibiotics are consistent. Tobramycin works synergistically to improve Vancomycin elution properties and is usually added in higher doses. Overall infection eradication is similar between all categories of spacers and range between 90–97%. Complications after placement of an articulating spacer are often specific to the type of spacer used. Handmade spaces that have K-wires for support are at risk for spacer cement fracture. Spacer dislocation is also a common complication in up to 15% of cases with all types of spacers. In addition, periprosthetic fractures can occur postoperatively in up to 10% of patients. Overall, despite this complication profile, articulating antibiotic spacers have excellent rates of infection eradication and offer improved mobilization in the interim two stage period and reduce operative time, complexity, and morbidity during reimplantation

The infected TKA is one of the most challenging complications of knee surgery, but spacers can make them easier to treat. An articulating spacer allows weight bearing and range of motion of the knee during rehabilitation. This spacer is made using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement applied to the tibial and femoral implants. For our purpose, 4.8g powdered tobramycin is mixed with 2gm vancomycin and one batch of antibiotic. Cement is applied early to the components, but applied late to the femur, tibia, and patella to allow molding to the defects and bone without solid adherence to bone. Patients have tailored intravenous antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks for treatment of various gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. At 10–12 weeks patients are revised to a cemented revision total knee arthroplasty using standard cementing techniques. From our experience, range of motion before reimplantation was 5 – 90 degrees. Follow-up averaged 73 months for fifty patients with 90% good to excellent results; 10% had a recurrence of infections. Use of an articulating spacer achieves soft tissue compliance, allows for ease of re-operation, reduced postoperative pain, improved function, and eradicates infection equal to standards reported in the literature

Aim. The primary endpoint of this study is to characterize the progression of bone defects at the femoral and tibial side in patients who sustained PJI of the knee that underwent two-stage revision with spacer implantation. In addition, we want to analyze the differences between functional moulded and hand-made spacers. Methods. A retrospective analysis of patients that underwent two-stage revision due to PJI of the knee between January 2014 and December 2021 at our institution. Diagnosis of infection was based on the criteria of the Muscoloskeletal Infection Society. The bone defect evaluation was performed intraoperatively based on the AORI classification. The basal evaluation was performed at the time the resection arthroplasty and spacer implantation surgery. The final evaluation was performed at the second-stage surgery, at the time of spacer removal and revision implant positioning. The differences between groups were characterized by using T-test student for continuous variables, and by using chi-square for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was defined as significant. Results. Complete data of 37 two-stage TKAs revision were included in the study. An articulating moulded functional spacer was used in 14 (35.9%) cases, while a hand-made spacer was used in 23 (58.9%) cases. The average length of interval period (excluding the time for patients that retained the spacer) was 146.6 days. A bone defects progression based on the AORI classification was documented in 24 cases at the femoral side (61.6%), a bone defect progression was documented in 17 cases at the tibial side (43.6%), and a bone defect at both sides was documented in 13 cases (33.3%). A statistically significant greater bone defect progression at the tibial side was observed when hand-made spacers were used. A complication during the interval period was reported in five cases (12.8%) and postoperative complication was reported in 9 cases (23.1%). Conclusions. When comparing patients in which a functional articulating spacer was used, with patients in which static spacer was used, we reported a statistically significant reduced bone defect progression during the interval period at the femoral side only when moulded spacers were used. We observed a higher incidence of bone defect progression also at the tibial and both sides when hand-made spacers were used. This is the first study that documented the bone defect progression during two-stage revision of the knee, the results observed in this study are very encouraging

Background. Vancomycin and fosfomycin are antibiotic commonly used in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. This study compares the efficacy of articulating cement spacer implegnated with vancomycin and articulating cement spacer implegnated with fosfomycin to inhibit MRSA. Methods. Vancomycin implegnated articulating cement spacers and Fosfomycin implegnated articulating cement spacers were immersed in sterile phosphate buffered saline(PBS) and then incubated at 37 C. The samples were collected and change daily. Aliquots were tested for MRSA inhibition by disc diffusion method. The inhibition zones diameters were measured. Results. Vancomycin group showed an MRSA inhibition zone up to four weeks. However, Fosfomycin group showed inhibition zone in day 3 in some samples but after that no sample had the potential to inhibit MRSA. Conclusion. In this experiment. Vancomycin impregnated articulating cement spacers showed longer efficacy to inhibit MRSA when compared to Fosfomycin

The infected TKA is one of the most challenging complications of knee surgery, but spacers can make them easier to treat. An articulating spacer allows weight bearing and range of motion of the knee during rehabilitation. This spacer is made using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement applied to the tibial and femoral implant. For our purpose, 4.8g powdered tobramycin is mixed with 2g vancomycin and one batch of cement. Cement is applied early to the components, but applied late to the femur, tibia, and patella to allow molding to the defects and bone without solid adherence to bone. Patients have tailored intravenous antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks for treatment of various gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. At 10–12 weeks patients are revised to a cemented revision total knee arthroplasty using standard cementing techniques. From our experience, range of motion before reimplantation was 5 – 90 degrees. Follow-up averaged 73 months for fifty patients with 90% good to excellent results; 10% had a recurrence of infections. Use of an articulating spacer achieves soft tissue compliance, allows for ease of re-operation, reduced post-operative pain, improved function, and eradicates infection equal to standards reported in the literature

We present a case of multifocal infection involving the left total hip replacement and the right total knee replacement of a patient, further complicated by an infected non-union of a periprosthetic fracture of the right knee. This required the unique simultaneous management of both infection eradication and fracture stabilization in the knee. Both sites were treated with a 2-stage procedure, including the novel use of a stemmed articulating spacer for the right knee. This spacer was made combining a retrograde humeral nail, coated with antibiotic-impregnated cement, and a pre-formed articulating cement spacer. The patient was able to weight-bear on this spacer. The fracture went on to unite, and a second stage was performed with the use of stemmed prosthesis and augments. She remains infection free 2 years after the second stage operation. The use of a stemmed articulating knee spacer can facilitate infection eradication and fracture stabilization while preserving some motion and weight-bearing ability in the 2 stage management of an infected periprosthetic fracture of the knee

Infected TKA is one of the most challenging complications of knee surgery, but spacers can make them easier. An articulating spacer allows partial weight bearing and range of motion of the knee during rehabilitation. This spacer is made using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement applied to the implant. For our purpose, 4.8 g powdered tobramycin is mixed with 2 g vancomycin and one batch of cement. Cement is applied early to the components, but applied late to the femur, tibia, and patella to allow molding to the defects and bone without solid adherence to bone. Patients have tailored intravenous antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks for treatment of various gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. At 10–12 weeks patients receive a cemented revision total knee arthroplasty using standard cementing techniques. From our experience range of motion before reimplantation is 5–90 degrees. Follow-up averaged 73 months for 50 patients with 90% good to excellent results, 10% may have a recurrence. Use of an articulating spacer achieves soft tissue compliance, allows for ease of operation, reduced post-operative pain, improved function, and eradicates infection equal to standards reported in the literature

Introduction. Septic knee arthritis with severe osteoarthritis (OA) presents challenging clinical situations because of unexpected and long time for treatment and less satisfactory clinical outcomes. Septic arthritis with damage to articular cartilage developed osteomyelitis (OM) frequently. Although arthroscopic debridement was the common treatment of septic arthritis, there was some limitation on the management of infected bone structures and then open arthrotomy should be reserved. In the patients of OM located only periarticular areas, the author used the PROSTALAC system for infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and achieved good results. Objectives. In periarticular OM with septic knee arthritis in patients with severe OA, we report the rate of control of infection using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer and to assess the clinical outcome after staged TKA. Methods. This study was conducted on a total of 11 patients (11 knees) treated for septic knee arthritis in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence classification grade 3–4 OA between April, 2014 and April, 2015. Of these, we retrospectively reviewed 6 knees of 6 patients (54.5%) who underwent staged TKA using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. The inclusion criteria were periarticular OM confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and whole body bone scan (WBBS), affected bone could be resected and covered by the PROSTALAC system. There were 2 males and 4 females with a mean age of 64 years (range, 61 to 68 years). Prior to the initial surgery, the average erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 87mm/h, and C-reactive protein (CRP) 8.8 mg/dl. The mean follow-up period was 14 months (range, 12 to 24 months). For clinical assessment, WOMAC, UCLA, Patient Satisfaction scores and postoperative complications were evaluated. For radiological assessment, weight-bearing radiographs of the knee were obtained to evaluate bone change, component loosening, and recurrence of infection. Results. The mean interval between initial operation using the PROSTALAC system and staged TKA was 8.2 weeks (range, 8–10 weeks). The species could be identified in the culture of aspiration of joint fluid prior to the initial operation. The most frequently found etiologic agent was gram-positive cocci (66.6%), followed by MRSA (16.7%) and yeast like fungi (16.7%). At last review, ESR and CRP returned to normal and follow-up cultures were negative in all patients. We observed improvements in mean WOMAC, UCLA, and Patient Satisfaction scores at last review. Radiographs at final follow-up showed well-fixed implants with no radiographic evidence of loosening or infection. Conclusions. In this study, we observed a 100% microbiologic cure and 89% clinical cure in patients who underwent a staged TKA using the PROSTALAC system with a 14-months follow-up. This method appears to have several important advantages (1) there is less possibility of additional bone resection due to uncontrolled infection of adjacent bone; (2) there are possibly expected interval between two stages and more good patient satisfaction. The staged TKA using the PROSTALAC spacer would have a predictable, favorable effect on the control of infection and improvements in the functional outcomes for the treatment periarticular OM with septic knee arthritis in patients with severe arthritis

Purpose. Two-stage revision with the removal of all prosthesis has been considered to be the gold standard for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. However, removal of well-fixed femoral stem is technically challenging and may cause excessive bone loss. The aim of this study was to compare the results between retention and removal of femoral stem when performing two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. Materials & Methods. From 2007 to 2014, ninety-four patients with infection after hip arthroplasty were treated by using two-stage exchange protocol with temporary articulating spacers. Among them, 38 patients completed the planned second stage reimplantation. Stem was exchanged in 15 patients (group I) and retained in 23 patients (group II). We retrospectively investigated the clinical and radiographic results after an average 39.9 months follow up. Results. The rate of infection control was 86.6% (13/15) in group I, 86.9% (20/23) in group II. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in term of demographics or presence of resistant organism. Conclusion. Retention of well-fixed cementless stem during two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty could be alternative treatment option for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection

Deep peri-prosthetic infection after partial or total knee arthroplasty is a disconcerting problem for patient and surgeon alike. The diagnosis of infection is sometimes obvious but frequently requires that the surgeon maintain a substantial index of suspicion for infection as the cause of pain or poor outcome after any joint arthroplasty. While surgical debridement with component retention is appropriate in a subgroup of patients with an acute peri-prosthetic infection, most delayed and chronic infections are best treated with component resection. With carefully selected patients and very aggressive debridement protocols some success has been demonstrated in Europe with single-stage exchange for infection. Most surgeons in North America, however, are unfamiliar with the very aggressive debridement techniques employed at European centers that promote single stage replant; and few surgeons in North America are currently comfortable in cementing a hinged total knee replacement in place for the typical infected TKA nor do they have the patience to re-prep and drape with an entirely new OR setup after debridement and prior to the insertion of the new implant − 2 steps that are often mentioned as important to the success of single stage exchange. The pre-eminent role of two-stage exchange as the definitive treatment was established over 30 years ago. Two-stage exchange remains the gold-standard in treatment with an established track record from multiple centers and with multiple different types of infecting organisms. Some of the historical problems with two-stage exchange, such as limited mobility during the interval stage, have been mitigated with the development of effective articulating spacer techniques. Further, the emergence of drug resistant bacteria and the possibility of fungal infection make two-stage exchange the best choice for the majority of patients with deep periprosthetic joint infection in 2017

Deep periprosthetic infection after hip or knee arthroplasty is a disconcerting problem for patient and surgeon alike. The diagnosis of infection is sometimes obvious but frequently requires that the surgeon maintain a substantial index of suspicion for infection as the cause of pain or poor outcome after any joint arthroplasty. While surgical debridement with component retention is appropriate in a subgroup of patients with an acute periprosthetic infection most delayed and chronic infections are best treated with component resection. The pre-eminent role of two-stage exchange as the definitive treatment was established over 30 years ago. Two-stage exchange remains the gold-standard in treatment with an established track record from multiple centers and with multiple different types of infecting organisms. Some of the historical problems with two-stage exchange, such as limited mobility during the interval stage, have been mitigated with the development of effective articulating spacer techniques. Further, the emergence of drug resistant bacteria and the possibility of fungal infection make two-stage exchange the best choice for the majority of patients with deep periprosthetic joint infection in 2015

Background. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication and interest exists in finding lower cost alternatives to current management strategies. Current strategies include a two-stage revision with placement of an antibiotic spacer and delayed placement of a new arthroplasty implant. This study aimed to show that biofilm residue can be reliably eradicated on infected implants, safely allowing re-implantation in a spacer. Methods. Strains of Staphylococcus aureus MRSA252 or Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A were grown on cobalt-chrome discs. For each strain, discs were divided into 5 groups (5 discs each) and exposed to several sterilization and biofilm eradication treatments: (1) autoclave, (2) autoclave + sonication; (3) autoclave + saline scrub; (4) autoclave + 4% chlorhexidine (CHC) scrub; and (5) autoclave + sonication + CHC scrub. Sterilization and biofilm eradication were quantified with crystal violet assays and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results. Relative to non-treated controls, autoclaving alone reduced biofilm load by 33.9% and 54.7% for MRSA252 and RP62A strains, respectively. On average, the most effective sterilization and biofilm removal treatment was the combined treatment of autoclaving, sonication and CHC-scrub for MRSA252 (100%) and RP62A (99.8%). High resolution SEM revealed no cells or biofilm for this combined treatment. Conclusions. Using two commonly encountered bacterial strains in PJI, infected cobalt-chrome implants were sterilized and eradicated of residual biofilm with a combination of autoclaving, sonication and CHC scrubbing. This protocol is time efficient, can be done in the OR and provides a basis for reuse of infected implants as articulating spacers in PJI

Infection after total knee arthroplasty poses formidable challenges to the surgeon. Once an infection is diagnosed, the identification of the organism and its sensitivity to antibiotics is essential. The host's healing capacity is vital. Optimisation of modifiable comorbidities, supplemental nutrition and cessation of smoking can improve wound healing. Surgical goals include debridement of necrotic tissue and elimination of the dead space. Intravenous antibiotics and a two-stage protocol are the standard of care. At our institution, the first stage is performed with an implant and antibiotic-cement composite. This articulating spacer maintains limb length and tissue compliance. The patient can maintain a functional status between stages. Definitive reconstruction is more readily accomplished with this method in contrast to the static spacer approach. The clinical efficacy of this protocol has been well documented in the literature

To report a rare case of successfully treated synchronous shoulder septic arthritis, total knee replacement infection and lumbar spondylodiscitis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Fifty-six year old woman, with a history of rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed at twenty-five year old, and total knee replacement at fifty-four. Recently treated with etanercept, presented with acute inflammatory signs of the right shoulder in addition to right knee and lumbar back pain for 6 months. After a shoulder and knee arthrocentesis the diagnosis suspicion of shoulder septic arthritis and total knee replacement infection was confirmed. Therefore it was performed shoulder arthroscopic irrigation and debridement and the first of two stages knee revision, with implantation of antibiotic cement on cement articulating spacer. It was also diagnosed a L1–L2 and L4–L5 spondylodiscitis with dural compression documented on MRI, which determined surgical treatment. By a posterior approach it was performed instrumentation from T11 to L5, followed by L1–L2 and L4–L5 discectomy and interbody fusion with autograft. Shoulder and knee synovial fluid cultures where positive for Methicillin Sensible Staphylococcus aureus narrowing the broad-spectrum combination therapy to levofloxacin for six weeks, with symptomatic relieve and C-reactive protein and white blood cell count returning to normal values. Almost one year down the line the patient remained with no sign of infection, even under the influence of immunosuppressive therapeutic. She returned to her previous status concerning the rheumatologic disease and the second stage knee revision is being planned to happen on the short run. Rheumatoid arthritis patients are a high-risk group for septic arthritis considering, among others, the immunosuppressive therapeutics and the frequent history of arthroplasty. The presented case illustrates three different type of septic complication in the same patient. The timely and aggressive approach was the key factor for a good outcome

A “two-stage exchange” remains the gold standard for treatment of the infected TKA in North America. Although there is interest in “one-stage exchange” this technique is not as familiar to many US surgeons and it is unclear if the reported results of Europe can be translated to North American practice. Specific concerns include the “radicalness” of the debridement required (which oftentimes includes the collateral ligaments, hence the popularity of hinged implants where this approach is common) and the use of fully cemented stems, which are extremely difficulty to remove if infection recurs. Thus while the idea of a one stage exchange is attractive to many North American surgeons, careful study will be required to determine if success can be achieved with a more “conservative” debridement and the use of cementless stems which are preferred by some surgeons. The basic principles of a two-stage exchange include: Thorough debridement of all infected appearing foreign material and all cement; Placement of an interval antibiotic loaded spacer (note that the addition of antibiotics to bone cement is NOT FDA approved) – 4–6g of antibiotics per pkg of cement; typically vancomycin + tobramycin; Higher viscosity cement may be associated with higher elution; The combination of antibiotics also leads to higher elution. Antibiotic spacers can be “articulating” or “static”. Potential advantages of an articulating spacer include greater patient comfort and an easier approach at the second stage exchange as soft tissue tension and range of motion is maintained. However, these spacers are oftentimes more costly and can break or dislocate. The first stage is followed by approximately 6 weeks of organism specific IV antibiotics. An interdisciplinary approach with an infectious disease specialist, internal medicine and a nutritionist optimises outcomes. Our protocol then includes weekly ESR and CRP to monitor their trend. These labs are re-checked two weeks after cessation of antibiotics to ensure the trend has not changed. The knee is routinely aspirated at this time point and the fluid obtained sent for a synovial fluid WBC count with differential and cultures (although the value of such cultures is controversial). We have found that while the ESR and CRP are significantly lower than prior to removal of the infected implant, they often times DO NOT normalise and there is no specific cut-off value that predicts persistent infection

A “two-stage exchange” remains the gold standard for treatment of the infected THA in North America. Although there is interest in “one-stage exchange” this technique is predicated on the use of fixation of the revision implants with antibiotic loaded cement, which is not as popular in North America. Diagnosis is critical and in general consists of a screening serum ESR and CRP followed by selective aspiration if the above are abnormal and/or if the clinical history is suspicious. The aspirated fluid is sent for a synovial fluid WBC (cut-off approximately 3,000 WBC/μL), differential (cut-off 80% PMN) and culture. The basic tenets of treatment include: . Thorough debridement of all infected appearing cement and all foreign material. Placement of an interval antibiotic loaded spacer (note that the addition of antibiotics to bone cement is NOT FDA approved). –. 4–6 g of antibiotics per pkg of cement; typically vancomycin + tobramycin. –. Higher viscosity cement may be associated with higher elution. –. Higher elution with combination of antibiotics. Antibiotic spacers can be “articulating” or “static”. Potential advantages of an articulating spacer include greater patient comfort and an easier approach at the second stage exchange as leg length and soft tissue tension is maintained. However, these spacers are oftentimes more costly and can dislocate. May not be appropriate in cases where there is severe bone loss that cannot support partial weight bearing or if the abductors are compromised (higher risk of dislocation). The first stage is followed by approximately 6 weeks of organism specific IV antibiotics. An interdisciplinary approach with an infectious disease specialist, internal medicine and a nutritionist optimises outcomes. Our protocol then includes weekly ESR and CRP to monitor their trend. These labs are re-checked two weeks after cessation of antibiotics to ensure the trend has not changed. We have found that while the ESR and CRP are significantly lower than prior to the 1st stage, they often times DO NOT normalise and there is no specific cut-off value that predicts persistent infection. An intra-operative aspiration for synovial fluid WBC count and differential is obtained intra-operatively (cut-off values of approximately 3,000 WBC/μl and 80% PMN) and are the best tests to identify persistent infection

Purpose. Infection following total knee arthroplasty is a devastating complication, requiring considerable effort on the part of the surgeon to eradicate the infection and restore joint function. Two-stage revision is the standard of care in the treatment of peri-prosthetic infection, using a temporary antibiotic-impregnated spacer between procedures. However, controversy remains concerning the use of static versus dynamic spacers, as well as the spacer material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in patients treated with a metal-on-polyethylene articulating spacer, as compared to those treated with a static antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer at the same centre. Method. Twenty-seven knees in patients with a mean age of 65 years (range, 40 to 80 years) were treated with two-stage revision of an infected total knee arthroplasty using a metal-on-polyethylene dynamic prosthetic spacer fixed with antibiotic-impregnated cement. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using maximum active knee range of motion, as well as modified Knee Society knee scores and incidence of re-infection at a minimum one-year follow-up. The results were compared to those achieved at similar follow-up in 10 patients treated with a static cement spacer. Demographic profile as measured by age and gender, and pre-operative Knee Society scores and range of motion were similar between the two groups. Results. At a mean of twenty-five months following re-implantation (range, 12 to 50 months), the patients treated with dynamic spacers had significantly higher Knee Society scores (mean 93 points, range 77 to 100 points) as compared to the group treated with static spacers (mean 76 points, range 59 to 89 points; p=0.039). Additionally, mean range of motion at final follow-up was substantially higher in the patients treated with dynamic spacers (mean 102 degrees, range 60 to 120 degrees versus mean 92 degrees, range 40 to 120 degrees). There was one re-infection in the dynamic spacer group (3.7%), in a patient whos clinical course was previously complicated by subluxation of the dynamic spacer between procedures. Otherwise, no gross loosening or fractures of the dynamic spacers were noted. Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the use of a cemented metal-on-polyethylene dynamic prosthetic spacer at the time of two-stage revision knee arthroplasty is similarly effective in eradicating peri-prosthetic infections when compared to the use of a cemented static spacer, while providing better clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up. Additionally, this spacer design provides a degree of mobility and knee function between procedures that is unachievable with a static construct, and appears to eliminate the potential complication of spacer fracture associated with pre-formed cement implants. The authors await further data to confirm these findings at longer-term follow-up

Introduction. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious problem and requires great effort and cost for its treatment. Treatment options may vary from resection arthroplasty, retention of prosthesis with debridement, one stage revision and two stage revision with handmade antibiotic impregnated cement spacer or with prefabricated antibiotic loaded cement spacer. Two stage revision remains the gold standard for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). This study was aimed to find the efficacy and cost effectiveness of handmade antibiotic impregnated articulating cement spacer over commercially available prefabricated antibiotic loaded cement spacer for the treatment of deep PJI of hip prosthesis and to evaluate its functional outcome. Material and methods. A total of 23 PJI patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. In the two stages of revision, the first stage consisted of thorough debridement, implant removal and implantation of handmade articulating antibiotic impregnated cement spacer. The second stage surgery consisted of removal of cement spacer, thorough debridement and implantation of new prosthesis. All patients were followed for a period of 24 months. Results. A total of 23 patients (15 males and 8 females) underwent two stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection. The mean age of the patient was 57 years. The handmade antibiotic impregnated cement spacer was retained for 16– 20 weeks. Common organism observed was coagulase negative staphylococci followed by Staphylococcus aureus. After an average follow up of 2 years, 20 patients with PJI remained clinically free of infection. In 2 patients there was recurrence of infection. Conclusion. We conclude that two stage revision by hand made cement spacer is successful in eradication of infection with satisfactory functional outcome. Furthermore, these handmade cement spacer are cost effective and their efficacy may be comparable to commercially available prefabricated spacer

Introduction. Antibiotic loaded polymethyle methacrylate spacers are commonly used in the management of septic hip replacements. Aim. The aim of this study was to determine wear patterns on the articulating surfaces of these spacers, as well as to determine the extent of PMMA particulate debris generation. Method. We took tissue specimens around the acetabulae in 12 cases at the time of the second stage procedure for septic total hip revisions. These were subjected to histological analysis to determine the extent of PMMA particulate debris contamination. We also performed a basic explant retrieval analysis of the articulating surfaces of the PMMA spacers to determine any specific wear patterns. Results. We found numerous PMMA particles in the acetabular soft tissues biopsied. The particle concentration was highest in the area of the acetabular fovea. We could also demonstrate specific wear patterns on the spacers that could be correlated with the generally mismatched articulating couple between the spacer and the bony acetabulum. We could also demonstrate some boney destruction present in the acetabulum with long-term spacer use. Conclusions. We concluded that significant amounts of PMMA particulate debris are generated by these articulating antibiotic spacers. The total volume of this debris may be determined by specific wear patterns on the spacers’ surfaces. We recommend a thorough debridement to decrease the PMMA particle load generated. Consideration in respect of the bearing surface implanted after the explantation of the PMMA spacer should take into account the effect of the debris on the bearing surfaces. We also make recommendations in respect of the design of these PMMA spacers

Infection after TKA remains a common reason for reoperation, and represents a significant burden for the patient and health care system. Having effective treatment strategies, therefore, is important to ensure the highest possible rate of success, and the lowest possible rate of reoperation due to treatment failure. This lecture will focus on the chronically infected TKA, where treatment options include either one stage exchange or two stage exchange. Proponents of one stage exchange cite lower costs, less morbidity, and reasonable success rates when compared to two stage exchange protocols. One must realise that strict selection criteria are generally used by proponents of single stage exchange. Favorable pathogens, healthy hosts, good soft tissues, minimal bone loss, etc. are generally used as indications to consider one stage exchange. Such “ideal” clinical situations, however, are exceedingly rare. The overwhelming majority of infected TKA in my practice involve resistant bacteria, significant bone loss, hosts with medical comorbidity, and often, poor soft tissues. In these situations, two stage exchange remains the gold standard to which all other interventions should be compared. With few exceptions, the published success rates for two stage procedures have been better, albeit slightly, than those published for one stage exchanges. Both static and articulating cement spacers have been used with good results. Further research is needed to better define the most effective treatment protocols, however, until further information is available, two stage exchange, with success rates of 80–90%, remains the most successful intervention for chronically infected TKA