There has been an exponential increase in the use of direct thrombin (DT) and factor Xa inhibitors (FXI) in patients with cardiovascular problems. Premature cessation of DT/FXI in patients with cardiac conditions can increase the risk of coronary events. Our aim was to ascertain whether it is necessary to stop DT and FXI preoperatively to avoid postoperative complications following hip fracture surgery. Prospective data was collected from 189 patients with ongoing DT/FXI therapy and patients not on DT/FXI who underwent hip fracture surgery. Statistical comparison on pre- and postoperative haemoglobin (Hb), ASA grades, comorbidities, operative times, transfusion requirements, hospital length of stay (LOS), wound infection, haematoma and reoperation rates between the two groups was undertaken.Background of study
Materials and Methods
Aim. Prosthetic joint replacement is more commonly done in the elderly group of patients due to an increase pathology related to joint degeneration that comes with age. In this age group is also more frequent having underling condition that may predispose to a prosthetic joint infection. Also, the pharmacological intervention in those patients may play an important role as a risk factor for infection after joint replacement surgery. The use of oral anticoagulants seems to be particularly increased in elderly patients but there aren't enough data published to support an association between prosthetic joint infection and the use of oral anticoagulants. Identifying risk factors in elderly patients age >75 years old with a special focus on the oral
Background. Intravenous and topical tranexamic acid (TXA) has become increasingly popular in total joint arthroplasty to decrease perioperative blood loss. In direct comparison, the outcomes and risks of either modality have been found to be equivalent. In addition, current literature has also demonstrated that topical TXA is safe and effective in the healthy population. To our knowledge, there is a scarcity of studies demonstrating the safety of topical TXA in high risk patient populations undergoing total joint arthroplasty or revision joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of topical TXA in patients undergoing total or revision arthroplasty that are also on chronic anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy. Methods. We performeded a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary and revision total hip or knee arthroplasties that received topical TXA (3g/100mL NS) from November 2012 to March 2015. All patients, regardless of co-morbidities, were included in the study population. Patients were divided into 3 groups:. Group 1: Patients without any antiplatelet or
Introduction. Embolism in total arthroplasty or hip fractures, coagulation disorders, such as a variety of ways for the prevention of complications of
There is a narrow line between the benefits and risks of
Objective:. To observe the incidence of intra-operative vascular injuries during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). Secondly, management and monitoring of the outcome post vascular injury during ACDF. Methods:. This a prospective study. A review of all spinal patients' records was performed from June 2006 to April 2011. A comprehensive literature review was also utilized. Inclusion criteria – all patients had ACDF post trauma. All non-traumatic cases were excluded. Results:. The study consisted of 55 patients; 15 were females and 40 were males. The age distribution was 23–65 years. Two patients were excluded due to non-traumatic causes. Of the remaining 53 patients, four sustained intra-operative vascular injuries during ACDF surgery. All 4 patients had corpectomies, and one case was an iatrogenic injury. The commonly injured vessel during the ACDF surgery was the left vertebral artery. Haemostatic control was achieved via tamponade and haemostatic agents. The left common carotid was iatrogenically injured in one case and was treated by microvascular repair. Three patients were treated with antiplatelet therapy for three months duration. The patient with an iatrogenic injury was treated with
Introduction. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved by USFDA for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in hip and knee arthroplasties. Its indication in hip fracture surgery has been recently recommended in Asian venous thromboembolism (VTE) guidelines. Phase II dose-ranging study demonstrated that 5 mg rivaroxaban is as effective as enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis with lower incidence of bleeding complication than the recommended 10 mg dose. Rivaroxaban is recommended to be given 6–8 hours after operation. However, many surgeons are hesitated to follow this guideline since it might increase post-operative blood loss and wound complication. Elderly patients, such as hip fracture patients, are generally at more risk of bleeding and wound complications. These patients may benefit from using the delayed and reduced-dose regimen. Methods. Since July 2011, all eligible hip fracture patients treated by single group of surgeons were given 5mg daily dose of rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis. Initial dose of rivaroxaban was given after drain had been removed (24–36 hours post-operatively) and continued for 14 days. Inclusion criteria are femoral neck fracture or intertrochanteric fracture in patients age 60 and over. Exclusion criteria are pathologic fracture, reoperation for failed fixation, chronic
The timely management of anticoagulated elderly trauma patients remains a contentious issue. Presently, the literature consists of largely contradictory expert opinions without evidence from randomised control trials. This study seeks to audit the practices of a non-metropolitan orthopaedic service, as a prelude to developing a local protocol for optimal management. All orthopaedic admissions to Toowoomba Hospital from January 2004 to December 2008 were reviewed. Approximately 700 patients over the age of 60 years were admitted with lower limb trauma. Those patients with pre-injury medication with warfarin and clopidogrel were identified, along with chronologically matched untreated patients. Those patients with coexisting head-injures, and those with sub therapeutic INR (INR <1.5) on admission were excluded from the study groups. Groups were analysed with respect to age, Injury Severity Score, ASA, time to theatre, time to discharge, transfusion requirement, and complications. Statistical analysis was completed using the T-test. Of the 700 patients identified, 24 were treated with warfarin and 28 treated with clopidogrel. Two patients with pre-injury warfarin use were excluded due to sub therapeutic INR on admission (INR 1.0 and 1.3). The control and treatment groups were statistically similar with respect to age, Injury Severity Score, and ASA. Injury patterns were similar across groups with over 80% proximal femoral fractures in each group. In both the warfarin and clopidogrel groups there was a statistically significant increase in time from admission to theatre compared with their matched controls (P<0.001). Average number of days to theatre was seven days and five days for the clopidogrel and warfarin groups respectively, compared to two days for both control groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in length of time from operation to the end of their acute care. There was no increase in transfusion requirement in those patients with pre-injury clopidogrel use. Pre-injury warfarinisation demonstrated a trend toward increased transfusion requirement compared with the matched controls (P=0.052); however, this was not significant. There was no clinically significant increase in complications in those patients with pre-injury use of warfarin or clopidogrel. This study demonstrated no increased morbidity in elderly patients with lower limb trauma when being treated with anticoagulants prior to injury. However, there is a significant delay in operative intervention in these patients. We believe this presents a case for early reversal of