Aims. Cam and pincer morphologies are potential precursors to hip osteoarthritis and important contributors to non-arthritic hip pain. However, only some hips with these pathomorphologies develop symptoms and joint degeneration, and it is not clear why. Anterior impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim in positions of hip flexion combined with rotation is a proposed pathomechanism in these hips, but this has not been studied in active postures. Our aim was to assess the anterior impingement pathomechanism in both active and passive postures with high hip flexion that are thought to provoke impingement. Methods. We recruited nine participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and with pain, 13 participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and without pain, and 11 controls from a population-based cohort. We scanned hips in active squatting and passive sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation using open MRI and quantified anterior femoroacetabular clearance using the β angle. Results. In squatting, we found significantly decreased anterior femoroacetabular clearance in painful hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean -11.3° (SD 19.2°)) compared to pain-free hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean 8.5° (SD 14.6°); p = 0.022) and controls (mean 18.6° (SD 8.5°); p < 0.001). In sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation, we found significantly decreased anterior clearance in both painful (mean -15.2° (SD 15.3°); p = 0.002) and painfree hips (mean -4.7° (SD 13°); p = 0.010) with cam and/pincer morphologies compared to the controls (mean 7.1° (SD 5.9°)). Conclusion. Our results support the anterior femoroacetabular impingement pathomechanism in hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies and highlight the effect of posture on this pathomechanism. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):988–996

Impingement by prominence at the femoral head-neck junction on the anterior acetabular rim may cause early osteoarthritis. Our aim was to develop a simple method to describe concavity at this junction, and then to test it by its ability to distinguish quantitatively a group of patients with clinical evidence of impingement from asymptomatic individuals who had normal hips on examination.

MR scans of 39 patients with groin pain, decreased internal rotation and a positive impingement test were compared with those of 35 asymptomatic control subjects. The waist of the femoral head-neck junction was identified on tilted axial MR scans passing through the centre of the head. The anterior margin of the waist of the femoral neck was defined and measured by an angle (α). In addition, the width of the femoral head-neck junction was measured at two sites.

Repeated measurements showed good reproducibility among four observers. The angle α averaged 74.0° for the patients and 42.0° for the control group (p < 0.001). Significant differences were also found between the patient and control groups for the scaled width of the femoral neck at both sites.

Using standardised MRI, the symptomatic hips of patients who have impingement have significantly less concavity at the femoral head-neck junction than do normal hips.

This test may be of value in patients with loss of internal rotation for which a cause is not found.

Hip precautions following total hip arthroplasty (THA) limits flexion, adduction and internal rotation, yet these precautions cause unnecessary psychological stress. This study aims to assess bony and implant impingement using virtual models from actual patient's bony morphology and spinopelvic parameters to deduce whether hip precautions are necessary with precise implant positioning in the Asian population. Individualized sitting and standing sacral slope data of robotic THAs performed at two tertiary referral centers in Hong Kong was inputted into the simulation system based on patients’ pre-operative sitting and standing lumbar spine X-rays. Three-dimensional dynamic models were reconstructed using the Stryker Mako THA 4.0 software to assess bony and implant impingement both anteriorly and posteriorly, with default cup placement at 40° inclination and 20° anteversion. Femoral anteversion followed individual patient's native version. A 36mm hip ball was chosen for all cups equal or above 48mm and 32mm for those below. Anterior impingement was assessed by hip flexion and posterior impingement was assessed by hip extension. 113 patients were included. At neutral rotation and adduction, no patients had anterior implant impingement at hip flexion of 100°. 1.7% had impingement at 110°, 3.5% had impingement at 120°, 9.7% had impingement at 130°. With 20° of internal rotation and adduction, 0.8% had anterior implant impingement at hip flexion of 90°, 7.1% had impingement at 100° and 18.5% had impingement at 110°. With the hip externally rotated by 20°, 0.8% of patients had posterior implant impingement, and 8.8% bony impingement at 0° extension. With enabling technology allowing accurate component positioning, hip precautions without limiting forward flexion in neutral position is safe given precise implant positioning and adequate osteophyte removal. Patients should only be cautioned about combined internal rotation, adduction with flexion

Aims. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients report exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion. However, the exact impingement location in deep flexion is unknown. The aim was to investigate impingement-free maximal flexion, impingement location, and if cam deformity causes hip impingement in flexion in FAI patients. Methods. A retrospective study involving 24 patients (37 hips) with FAI and femoral retroversion (femoral version (FV) < 5° per Murphy method) was performed. All patients were symptomatic (mean age 28 years (SD 9)) and had anterior hip/groin pain and a positive anterior impingement test. Cam- and pincer-type subgroups were analyzed. Patients were compared to an asymptomatic control group (26 hips). All patients underwent pelvic CT scans to generate personalized CT-based 3D models and validated software for patient-specific impingement simulation (equidistant method). Results. Mean impingement-free flexion of patients with mixed-type FAI (110° (SD 8°)) and patients with pincer-type FAI (112° (SD 8°)) was significantly (p < 0.001) lower compared to the control group (125° (SD 13°)). The frequency of extra-articular subspine impingement was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in patients with pincer-type FAI (57%) compared to cam-type FAI (22%) in 125° flexion. Bony impingement in maximal flexion was located anterior-inferior at femoral four and five o’clock position in patients with cam-type FAI (63% (10 of 16 hips) and 37% (6 of 10 hips)), and did not involve the cam deformity. The cam deformity did not cause impingement in maximal flexion. Conclusion. Femoral impingement in maximal flexion was located anterior-inferior distal to the cam deformity. This differs to previous studies, a finding which could be important for FAI patients in order to avoid exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion (e.g. during squats) and for hip arthroscopy (hip-preservation surgery) for planning of bone resection. Hip impingement in flexion has implications for daily activities (e.g. putting on shoes), sports, and sex. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):22–32

The 10 year survivorship of THR is generally over 95%. However, the incidence of revision is usually higher in year one. The most common reason being dislocation which at least in part is driven by inadequate range of motion (ROM) leading to impingement, subluxation and ultimately dislocation which is more frequently posterior. ROM is affected by patient activity, bone and component geometry, and component placement. To reduce the incidence of dislocation, supported by registry data, there has been an increase in the use of so-called ‘lipped’ liners. Whilst this increases joint stability, the theoretical ROM is reduced. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lip placement on impingement. A rigid body geometric model was incorporated into a CT scan hemi-pelvis and femur, with a clinically available THR virtually implanted. Kinematic activity data associated with dislocation was applied, comprising of five posterior and two anterior dislocation risk activities, resulting from anterior and posterior impingement respectively. Cup inclination and anteversion was varied (30°-70°, 0°-50° respectively) to simulate extremes of clinical outcomes. The apex position of a ‘lipped’ liner was rotated from the superior position, anteriorly and posteriorly in steps of 45°. Incidence and location of implant and bone impingement was recorded in 5346 cases generated. A liner with the lip placed superior increased the occurrence of implant-implant impingement compared with a neutral liner. Rotation of the lip from superior reduced this incidence. This effect was more marked with posterior rotation which after 90° reduced anterior impingement to levels similar to a neutral liner. Complete inversion of the lipped liner reduced impingement, but this and anterior rotation both negate its function – additional stability. This study comprises one bone geometry and component design and one set of activity profiles. Nevertheless, it indicates that appropriate lip placement can minimise the likelihood of impingement for a range of daily activities whilst still providing additional joint stability

Mechanical irritation or impingement of the iliopsoas tendon accounts for 2–6% of persistent postoperative pain cases after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most common trigger is anterior cup overhang. CT-scan can be used to identify and measure this overhang; however, no threshold exists for symptomatic anterior iliopsoas impingement. We conducted a case–control study in which CT-scan was used to define a threshold that differentiates patients with iliopsoas impingement from asymptomatic patients after THA. We analyzed the CT-scans of 622 patients (758 CT-scans) between 2011 and 2020. Out of this population we identified 136 patients with symptoms suggestive of iliopsoas impingement. Among them, 6 were subsequently excluded: three because the diagnosis was reestablished intra-operatively (one metallosis, two anterior instability related to posterior prosthetic impingement) and three because they had another obvious cause of impingement (one protruding screw, one protruding cement plug, one stem collar), leaving 130 patients in the study (impingement) group. They were matched to a control group of 138 patients who were asymptomatic after THA. The anterior cup overhang (anterior margin of cup not covered by anterior wall) was measured by an observer (without knowledge of the clinical status) on an axial CT slice based on anatomical landmarks (orthogonal to pelvic axis). The impingement group had a median overhang of 8 mm [IQR: 5 to 11] versus 0 mm [IQR: 0 to 4] for the control group (p<.001). Using ROC curves, an overhang threshold of 4 mm was best correlated with a diagnosis of impingement (sensitivity 79%, specificity 85%, PPV = 75%, NPV = 85%). Pain after THA related to iliopsoas impingement can be reasonably linked to acetabular overhang if it exceeds 4 mm on a CT scan. Below this threshold, it seems logical to look for another cause of iliopsoas irritation or another reason for the pain after THA before concluding impingement is present

Aims. Our study aimed to 1) determine if there was a difference for the HOOS-PS score between patients with stiff/normal/hypermobile spinopelvic mobility and 2) to investigate if functional sagittal cup orientation affected patient reported outcome 1 year post-THA. Methods. This prospective diagnostic cohort study followed 100 consecutive patients having received unilateral THA for end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Pre- and 1-year postoperatively, patients underwent a standardized clinical examination, completed the HOOS-PS score and sagittal low-dose radiographs were acquired in the standing and relaxed-seated position. Radiographic measurements were performed for the lumbar-lordosis-angle, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic-femoral-angle and cup ante-inclination. The HOOS-PS was compared between patients with stiff (ΔPT<±10°), normal (10°≤ΔPT≤30°) and hypermobile spinopelvic mobility (ΔPT>±30°). Results. Preoperatively, 16 patients demonstrated stiff, 70 normal and 14 hypermobile spinopelvic mobility without a difference in the HOOS-PS score (66±14/67±17/65±19;p=0.905). One year postoperatively, 43 patients demonstrated stiff, 51 normal and 6 hypermobile spinopelvic mobility. All postoperative hypermobile patients had normal spinopelvic mobility preoperatively and showed significantly worse HOOS-PS scores compared to patients with stiff or normal spinopelvic mobility (21±17/21±22/35±16;p=0.043). Postoperatively, patients with hypermobile spinopelvic mobility demonstrated no significant difference for the pelvic tilt in the standing position compared to the other two groups (19±8°/16±8°/19±4°;p=0.221), but a significantly lower sagittal cup ante-inclination (36±10°/36±9°/29±8°;p=0.046). Conclusion. The present study demonstrated that patients with normal preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic hypermobility show worse HOOS-PS scores than patients with stiff or normal spinopelvic mobility. The lower postoperative cup ante-inclination seems to force the pelvis to tilt more posteriorly when moving from the standing to seated position (spinopelvic hypermobility) in order to avoid anterior impingement. Thus, functional cup orientation in the sagittal plane seems to affect postoperative patient reported outcome

To confirm whether developmental dysplasia of the hip has a risk of hip impingement, we analysed maximum ranges of movement to the point of bony impingement, and impingement location using three-dimensional (3D) surface models of the pelvis and femur in combination with 3D morphology of the hip joint using computer-assisted methods. Results of computed tomography were examined for 52 hip joints with DDH and 73 normal healthy hip joints. DDH shows larger maximum extension (p = 0.001) and internal rotation at 90° flexion (p < 0.001). Similar maximum flexion (p = 0.835) and external rotation (p = 0.713) were observed between groups, while high rates of extra-articular impingement were noticed in these directions in DDH (p < 0.001). Smaller cranial acetabular anteversion (p = 0.048), centre-edge angles (p < 0.001), a circumferentially shallower acetabulum, larger femoral neck anteversion (p < 0.001), and larger alpha angle were identified in DDH. Risk of anterior impingement in retroverted DDH hips is similar to that in retroverted normal hips in excessive adduction but minimal in less adduction. These findings might be borne in mind when considering the possibility of extra-articular posterior impingement in DDH being a source of pain, particularly for patients with a highly anteverted femoral neck. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:580–9

Posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral hip impingement can be caused by high femoral torsion and is typically located between the ischium and the lesser trochanter. We asked if patients undergoing derotational femoral osteotomies for posterior FAI have (1) decreased hip pain and improved function and evaluated (2) subsequent surgeries and complications?. Thirty-three hips undergoing derotational femoral osteotomies between 2005 and 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Of them 15 hips underwent derotational femoral osteotomies and 18 hips underwent derotational femoral osteotomies combined with varisation (neck-shaft angle >139°). Indication for derotational osteotomies was a positive posterior impingement test in extension and external rotation, high femoral torsion (48° ± 9) on CT scans and limited external rotation. Offset improvement was performed to avoid intraarticular impingement in hips with a cam-type FAI. All patients were female and mean followup was 3 ± 2 (1 – 11) years. At latest followup the positive posterior and anterior impingement test decreased from preoperatively 100% to 5% (p< 0.001) and from preoperatively 85% to 30% (p< 0.001). The mean Merle d'Aubigné Postel score increased from 14 ± 1 (11 – 16) to 16 ± 1 (13 – 17) at latest followup (p< 0.001). At followup 32/33 hips had been preserved and one hip had been converted to a total hip arthroplasty (THA). In two hips (6%) revision osteosynthesis was performed for delayed healing of the femoral osteotomy. Derotational femoral osteotomies for the treatment of posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral impingement caused by high femoral torsion result in decreased hip pain and improved function at midterm followup but had 6% delayed healing rate requiring revision surgery

Aims

The risk factors for abnormal spinopelvic mobility (SPM), defined as an anterior rotation of the spinopelvic tilt (∆SPT) ≥ 20° in a flexed-seated position, have been described. The implication of pelvic incidence (PI) is unclear, and the concept of lumbar lordosis (LL) based on anatomical limits may be erroneous. The distribution of LL, including a unusual shape in patients with a high lordosis, a low pelvic incidence, and an anteverted pelvis seems more relevant.

Introduction. The mechanisms of how spinal arthrodesis (SA) affects patient function after total hip replacement (THA) remain unclear. The objectives of this study were to a) Determine how outcome post-THA compares between patients with- and without-SA, b) Characterize sagittal pelvic changes that occur when moving between different functional positions, and test for differences between patients with- and without-SA, and c) Assess whether differences in sagittal pelvic dynamics are associated with outcome post-THA. Patients/Materials & Methods. Forty-two patients with THA-SA (60 hips) were case-control matched for age, gender, BMI with 42 THA-only patients (60 hips). All presented for review where outcome, PROMs [including Oxford-Hip-Score(OHS)] and 4 radiographs of the pelvis and spino-pelvic complex in 3 positions (supine, standing, deep-seated) were obtained. Cup orientation and various spino-pelvic parameters [including pelvic tilt (PT) and Pelvic-Femoral-Angle (PFA)] were measured. The difference in PT between standing and seated allowed for patient classification based on spino-pelvic mobility into normal (±10–30°), stiff (<±10°) or hypermobile (>±30°). Results. The THA-SA group had inferior PROMs (OHS: 33vs.43; P<0.001) and more complications (12vs.3; p=0.01), especially dislocation (5vs.0) than the THA-only group. No difference in change of PT between supine and standing positions was detected between groups. When standing, THA-SA patients had greater PT (24°vs.17°; p=0.01) and the hip was more extended (194°vs.185°; P<0.001). THA-SA patients were 4 times more likely to have spino-pelvic hypermobility with anterior tilting of their pelvis. Of all biomechanical parameters, only spino-pelvic hypermobility was associated with significant inferior PROMs (OHS:35; p=0.04) and was also present in dislocating hips that required revision despite optimum cup orientation. Discussion. In patients with SA who have undergone a THA, the presence of spino-pelvic hypermobility is associated with an inferior outcome and leads to hip instability secondary to anterior impingement when deep seated (anterior tilt functionally retroverting cup). For those patients, current implant positioning may not be sufficient to avoid dislocation. Conclusion. THA in the presence of a SA is associated with inferior outcomes and higher complication rates. We recommend that assessing spino-pelvic mobility should form an integral part of pre-operative assessment in patients with SA due for a THA

Aims

Precise implant positioning, tailored to individual spinopelvic biomechanics and phenotype, is paramount for stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a few studies on instability prediction, there is a notable gap in research utilizing artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of our pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of developing an AI algorithm tailored to individual spinopelvic mechanics and patient phenotype for predicting impingement.

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify the optimal lip position for total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using a lipped liner. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal position, with substantial variability in surgeon practice.

Aims

Iliopsoas impingement occurs in 4% to 30% of patients after undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a relatively high incidence, there are few attempts at modelling impingement between the iliopsoas and acetabular component, and no attempts at modelling this in a representative cohort of subjects. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel computational model for quantifying the impingement between the iliopsoas and acetabular component and validate its utility in a case-controlled investigation.

Aims

Pelvic incidence (PI) is a position-independent spinopelvic parameter traditionally used by spinal surgeons to determine spinal alignment. Its relevance to the arthroplasty surgeon in assessing patient risk for total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability preoperatively is unclear. This study was undertaken to investigate the significance of PI relative to other spinopelvic parameter risk factors for instability to help guide its clinical application.

We carried out the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of 13 dysplastic hips in 11 skeletally mature patients with an underlying neurological diagnosis. Seven hips had flaccid paralysis and six were spastic. The mean age at the time of surgery was 23 years and the mean length of follow-up was 6.4 years. Preoperatively, 11 hips had pain and two had progressive subluxation. Before operation the mean Tönnis angle was 33°, the mean centre-edge angle was −10°, and the mean extrusion index was 53%. Postoperatively, they were 8°, 25° and 15%, respectively. Pain was eliminated in 7 patients and reduced in four in those who had preoperative pain. One patient developed pain secondary to anterior impingement from excessive retroversion of the acetabulum. Four required a varus proximal femoral osteotomy at the time of the pelvic procedure and one a late varus proximal femoral osteotomy for progressive subluxation. Before operation no patient had arthritis. At the most recent follow-up one had early arthritis of the hip (Tönnis grade I) and one had advanced arthritis (Tönnis grade III). Our results suggest that the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy can be used successfully to treat neurogenic acetabular dysplasia in skeletally mature patients

Aims

Acetabular edge-loading was a cause of increased wear rates in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties, ultimately contributing to their failure. Although such wear patterns have been regularly reported in retrieval analyses, this study aimed to determine their in vivo location and investigate their relationship with acetabular component positioning.

Aims

The effect of pelvic tilt (PT) and sagittal balance in hips with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion (AR) is controversial. It is unclear if patients with AR have a rotational abnormality of the iliac wing. Therefore, we asked: are parameters for sagittal balance, and is rotation of the iliac wing, different in patients with AR compared to a control group?; and is there a correlation between iliac rotation and acetabular version?

Aims

Spinopelvic mobility plays an important role in functional acetabular component position following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary aim of this study was to determine if spinopelvic hypermobility persists or resolves following THA. Our second aim was to identify patient demographic or radiological factors associated with hypermobility and resolution of hypermobility after THA.

Aims

Our retrospective analysis reports the outcome of patients operated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis using the modified Dunn procedure. Results, complications, and the need for revision surgery are compared with the recent literature.