Abstract. Skeletal kinematics are traditionally measured by motion analysis methods such as optical motion capture (OMC). While easy to carry out and clinically relevant for certain applications, it is not suitable for analysing the ankle joint due to its anatomical complexity. A greater understanding of the function of healthy ankle joints could lead to an improvement in the success of ankle-replacement surgeries. Biplane video X-ray (BVX) is a technique that allows direct measurement of individual bones using highspeed, dynamic X-Rays. Objective. To develop a protocol to quantify in-vivo foot and ankle kinematics using a bespoke High-speed Dynamic Biplane X-ray system combined with OMC. Methods. Two healthy volunteers performed five level walks and step-down trials while simultaneous capturing BVX and synchronised OMC. participants undertook MR imaging (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens) which was manually segmented into 3D bone models (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis). Bone position and orientation for the Talus, Tibia and Calcaneus were calculated by manual matching of 3D Bone models to X-Rays (DSX Suite, C-Motion, Inc.). OMC markers were tracked (QTM, Qualisys) and processed using Visual 3D (C-motion, Inc.). Results. Initial results for level walking showed that OMC overestimated the rotational range of motion (ROM) in all three planes for the tibiotalar joint compared with BVX (Sagittal: OMC 30°/BVX 20°, Frontal: OMC 16°/BVX 15° and Transverse: OMC 20°/BVX 17°). For the subtalar joint, OMC (22°) over-estimated sagittal ROM compared with BVX (14°) and underestimated the ROM in the other planes (Frontal: OMC 8°/BVX 15° and Transverse: OMC 18°/BVX 20°). Conclusions. The results highlight the discrepancy between OMC and BVX methods. However, the BVX results are consistent with previous literature. The protocol developed here will form the foundation of future patient-based studies to investigate in-vivo ankle kinematics. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

To be able to assess the biomechanical and functional effects of ankle injury and disease it is necessary to characterise healthy ankle kinematics. Due to the anatomical complexity of the ankle, it is difficult to accurately measure the Tibiotalar and Subtalar joint angles using traditional marker-based motion capture techniques. Biplane Video X-ray (BVX) is an imaging technique that allows direct measurement of individual bones using high-speed, dynamic X-rays. The objective is to develop an in-vivo protocol for the hindfoot looking at the tibiotalar and subtalar joint during different activities of living. A bespoke raised walkway was manufactured to position the foot and ankle inside the field of view of the BVX system. Three healthy volunteers performed three gait and step-down trials while capturing Biplane Video X-Ray (125Hz, 1.25ms, 80kVp and 160 mA) and underwent MR imaging (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens) which were manually segmented into 3D bone models (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis). Bone position and orientation for the Talus, Calcaneus and Tibia were calculated by manual matching of 3D Bone models to X-Rays (DSX Suite, C-Motion, Inc.). Kinematics were calculated using MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc. USA). Pilot results showed that for the subtalar joint there was greater range of motion (ROM) for Inversion and Dorsiflexion angles during stance phase of gait and reduced ROM for Internal Rotation compared with step down. For the tibiotalar joint, Gait had greater inversion and internal rotation ROM and reduced dorsiflexion ROM when compared with step down. The developed protocol successfully calculated the in-vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints for different dynamic activities of daily living. These pilot results show the different kinematic profiles between two different activities of daily living. Future work will investigate translation kinematics of the two joints to fully characterise healthy kinematics

Abstract. Objectives. The syndesmosis joint, located between the tibia and fibula, is critical to maintaining the stability and function of the ankle joint. Damage to the ligaments that support this joint can lead to ankle instability, chronic pain, and a range of other debilitating conditions. Understanding the kinematics of a healthy joint is critical to better quantify the effects of instability and pathology. However, measuring this movement is challenging due to the anatomical structure of the syndesmosis joint. Biplane Video Xray (BVX) combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) allows direct measurement of the bones but the accuracy of this technique is unknown. The primary objective is to quantify this accuracy for measuring tibia and fibula bone poses by comparing with a gold standard implanted bead method. Methods. Written informed consent was given by one participant who had five tantalum beads implanted into their distal tibia and three into their distal fibula from a previous study. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the tibia and fibula were segmented (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis) from an MRI scan (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens). The beads were segmented from a previous CT and co-registered with the MRI bone models to calculate their positions. BVX (125 FPS, 1.25ms pulse width) was recorded whilst the participant performed level gait across a raised platform. The beads were tracked, and the bone position of the tibia and fibula were calculated at each frame (DSX Suite, C-Motion Inc.). The beads were digitally removed from the X-rays (MATLAB, MathWorks) allowing for blinded image-registration of the MRI models to the radiographs. The mean difference and standard deviation (STD) between bead-generated and image-registered bone poses were calculated for all degrees of freedom (DOF) for both bones. Results. The absolute mean tibia and fibula bone position differences (Table 1) between the bead and BVX poses were found to be less than 0.5 mm for both bones. The bone rotation differences were found to be less than 1° for all axes except for the fibula Z axis rotation which was found to be 1.46°. One study. 1. has reported the kinematics of the syndesmosis joint and reported maximum ranges of motion of 9.3°and translations of 3.3mm for the fibula. The results show that the accuracy of the methodology is sufficient to quantify these small movements. Conclusions. BVX combined with MRI can be used to accurately measure the syndesmosis joint. Future work will look at quantifying the accuracy of the talus to provide further understanding of normal ankle kinematics and to quantify the kinematics across a healthy population to act as a comparator for future patient studies. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Total ankle replacement (TAR) is a substitute to ankle fusion, replacing the degenerated joint with a mechanical motion-conserving alternative. Compared with hip and knee replacements, TARs remain to be implanted in much smaller numbers, due to the surgical complexity and low mid-to-long term survival rates. TAR manufacturers have recently explored the use of varying implant sizes to improve TAR performance. This would allow surgeons a wider scope for implanting devices for varying patient demographics. Minimal pre-clinical testing has been demonstrated to date, while existing wear simulation standards lack definition. Clinical failure of TARs and limited research into wear testing defined a need for further investigation into the wear performance of TARs to understand the effects of the kinematics on varying implant sizes. Six medium and six extra small BOX® (MatOrtho) TARs will be tested in a modified knee simulator for 5 million cycles (Mc). The combinations of simulator inputs that mimic natural gait conditions were extracted from ankle kinematic profiles defined in previous literature. The peak axial load will be 3.15 kN, which is equivalent to 4.5 times body weight of a 70kg individual. The flexion profile ranges from 15° plantarflexion to 15° dorsiflexion. Rotation about the tibial component will range from −2.3° of internal rotation to 8° external rotation, while the anterior/posterior displacement will be 7mm anterior to −2mm posterior throughout the gait cycle. The components will be rotated through the simulation stations every Mc to account for inter-station variability. Gravimetric measurements of polyethylene wear will be taken at every Mc stage. A contact profilometer will also be used to measure average surface roughness of each articulating surface pre-and-post simulation. The development of such methods will be crucial in the ongoing improvement of TARs, and in enhancing clinical functionality, through understanding the envelope of TAR performance

Abstract. Background. Proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) was defined to provide a treatment option for knee pain caused by gonarthrosis(1). Minor surgical procedure, low complication rate and dramatic pain relief were the main reasons for popularization of this procedure(2, 3). However, changes at the knee and ankle joint after PFO were not clarified objectively in the literature. Questions/purposes. We asked: 1) Does PFO change the maximum and average pressures at the medial and lateral chondral surface of the tibia plateau? 2) Are chondral surface stresses redistributed at the knee and ankle joint after PFO? 3)Does PFO change the distribution of total load on the knee joint? 4) Can PFO lead to change in alignment of lower limb?. Methods. This study was conducted at Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department and Yildiz Technical University Mechanical Engineering Department in Istanbul, Turkey, between September 2019 and February 2020. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to evaluate effects of PFO(4). One 62 years old, female volunteer's X-ray, computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging images were used for creating right lower limb model. Two different lower limb models were created. One of them was osteotomized model (OM) which was created according to definition of PFO and the other was non-osteotomized model (NOM). To obtain a stress distribution comparison between the two models, 350 N of axial force was applied to the femoral heads of the models. Results. After PFO, the maximum contact pressures at the medial and lateral tibial cartilages decreased 83.2% and 66.9%, respectively at the knee joint. The average contact pressure decreased 26.1% at the medial tibial cartilage and increased 42.4% at the lateral tibial cartilage. The Von Mises stresses decreased 57.1% at the femoral cartilage and decreased 79.1% at tibial cartilage. The stress on the tibial cartilage increased 44.6%, and stress on the talar cartilage increased 7.1% at the ankle joint. Under a 350 N axial force, distribution of the total load at the knee joint was changed and become more homogenous in OM compared to NOM. Change in lower extremity alignment after PFO could not be evaluated with FEA. Conclusion. FEA revealed that PFO causes some changes in knee and ankle joint kinematics. Main loading at the knee joint shifted from medial tibial cartilage to the lateral tibial cartilage after PFO. Additionally, the stresses on each cartilage were redistributed across a wider and more peripheral area. These changes could be the main reason for pain relief at the knee joint. FEA also demonstrated that the Von Mises stresses of the tibial and talar cartilages of the ankle joint increased after PFO. This stress increase may cause long-term arthritic changes in the ankle joint. Level IV; in silico study