We present a study done to measure the change of angle of the acetabulum or cup, due to leg length discrepancy, deformity of hip and spine on standing. In 1998 a 3-dimensional reconstruction of hip model was prepared on CAD and the change of angle of the cup was measured as Functional Acetabular Inclination Angle (FAIA) with patient standing without squaring the pelvis. The FAIA on standing was compared with angle of the cup with patient in supine position with squared pelvis. The position of the cup changed on weight bearing due to multiple issues. The results showed that one centimetre of leg lengthening changed FAIA by 3°, 10° of abduction deformity resulted in apparent lengthening of 2.87 cm and loss of lordosis anteverted the cup on loading and vice-versa. We conclude that fixed hip deformities, leg length discrepancy and spine deformities can affect the angle of cup in hip replacement surgery and may prone to dislocations, impingement and segmental wear of the cup

The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the acetabular component introducer as a tool to intra-operatively predict implant inclination in total hip arthroplasty. This study investigated (1) the correlation between intra-operative photographic assessment of cup inclination using the acetabular introducer and that measured on post-operative radiograph; and (2) the accuracy of intra-operative prediction of abduction angle. For this study, we prospectively recruited 56 patients scheduled to receive primary hip arthroplasty from one of two senior surgeons. During the procedure, the lead surgeon provided a prediction of the abduction angle based on the alignment of the impactor attached to the cup in its final seated position. A standardized anteroposterior (AP) photograph was then taken of the acetabular impactor in situ. Abduction angles were measured by two observers on the photographs and post-operative AP pelvis radiographs. Linear regression was used to determine the correlation between the angle of the guide measured on the photographs and the actual position of the implant measured on the radiograph. Descriptive statistics were further used to analyze the accuracy of the intra-operative prediction as compared with the abduction angle measured on the photographs. Measurements of cup position made from post-operative radiographs were significantly correlated with the measurements as assessed by intra-operative photographs (r = 0.34, p = 0.00). Our findings demonstrate that radiological abduction angles tend to be greater than that assessed by intra-operative photographs by a mean of 5.6 degrees (SD = 6.6 degrees; 95% CI = 7.3 to 3.9 degrees). Conversely, surgeon prediction of cup inclination based on the acetabular introducer differed from the radiographic measurements by a mean of 6.8 degrees (SD = 8.7 degrees). There was good agreement between the two observers in both photographic and radiographic measurement (k = 0.95, k = 0.96, respectively). In conclusion, we found that the intra-operative photographic assessment of acetabular cup inclination by acetabular impactor alignment tends to underestimate the abduction angle by a mean of approximately 5 degrees. In addition, intra-operative surgeon estimation of acetabular inclination did not appear accurate in this study demonstrating that cup position should rely on additional visual cues beyond that captured in the anteroposterior view of the cup introducer

Introduction. Primary robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) yields more accurate and reproducible acetabular cup placement, nonetheless, data is scarce in terms of outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to report on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in a large group of patients who underwent robotic-arm assisted THA. The authors hypothesized that (1) patients who underwent robotic-arm assisted primary THA would achieve favorable and significant improvement in PROMs, (2) an accurate and reproducible acetabular cup placement with respect to the defined SafeZones would be obtained, and (3) a low rate of THA dislocation would be observed. Methods. Prospectively collected data were retrospectively reviewed between April 2012 to May 2017. Primary THA using Mako Robotic-Arm [Mako Surgical Corp. (Stryker), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA] with minimum two-year follow-up for the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were included. Exclusion criteria were: bodymass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2, age < 21-year old, worker's compensation, or unwilling to participate. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction were obtained. Intraoperative measurements for leg-length, global offset, acetabular inclination and version were documented. Results. 501 hips were included (57.29% females), follow-up was 43.99 ± 15.59 months. Average age was 58.70 ± 9.41 years, and the BMI was 28.41 ± 4.55 kg/m2. The group reported HHS of 90.87 ± 13.45, FJS-12 of 79.97 ± 25.87, VAS of 1.20 ± 2.06, and patient satisfaction of 8.85 ± 2.08. Intraoperative values for acetabular inclination and version were 40.0° ± 2.2 ° and 20.5° ± 2.4° respectively. Revision due to instability was 0.2%. Conclusions. Patients who received primary robotic-arm assisted THA reported excellent results at 44-month follow-up for multiple PROMs. Consistency in acetabular cup placement accuracy was achieved in regard to the Lewinnek and Callanan safe-zones

Introduction. When performing a total hip arthroplasty (THA), some surgeons routinely perform an intraoperative anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph to assess components. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the intraoperative radiograph to accurately reflect acetabular inclination, leg length, and femoral offset as compared to the immediate postoperative supine AP radiograph. Methods. The intraoperative (lateral decubitus position) and immediate postoperative (supine position) AP pelvis x-rays of 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular inclination, leg length, and femoral offset were measured on both radiographs. We analyzed the correlation coefficient of the recorded measurements between the two films as well as the interobserver reliability of each measurement obtained. Results. Our data demonstrated a high positive correlation between the intraoperative and postoperative acetabular inclination measurements of both reviewers (r=.886 and .896). In addition, no significant difference was observed between the inclination measurements (p= .06 and .37). There was a moderate correlation among the leg length (r= .58 and .66) and poor correlation among the offset (r= .29 and .25) between the two radiographs. One observer generated a significant difference between leg length measurements while both reviewers generated a significant difference between offset measurements. Interobserver reliability was high for all measurements. Conclusion. Intraoperative AP radiographs are commonly obtained during THA to aid in evaluation of component position and size, femoral neck cut, femoral canal fill, and detection of occult fractures. Results from this study suggest that this film could also be used to accurately measure acetabular inclination, but is a less reliable indicator of femoral offset and leg length when compared to the immediate postoperative film. In addition, the high interobserver correlation illustrates the high reproducibility of the measurement methods utilized

Introduction. Studies of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) have reported high complication and failure rates due to elevated metal ion levels. These rates were shown to be especially high for the Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) HRA, possibly due to its unique design. Associations between metal ion concentrations and various biological and mechanical factors have been reported. Component positioning as measured by acetabular inclination has been shown to be of especially strong consequence in metal ion production in ASR HRA patients, but few studies have evaluated acetabular anteversion as an independent variable. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the associations between component orientation, quantified by acetabular inclination and anteversion, and blood metal ions. Secondly, we sought to report whether conventional safe zones apply to MoM HRA implants or if these implants require their own positioning standards. Methods. We conducted a multi-center, prospective study of 512 unilateral ASR HRA patients enrolled from September 2012 to June 2015. At time of enrollment our patients were a mean of 7 (3–11.5) years from surgery. The mean age at surgery was 56 years and 24% were female. All subjects had complete demographic and surgical information and blood metal ions. In addition, each patient had valid AP pelvis and shoot-though lateral radiographs read by 5 validated readers measuring acetabular abduction and anteversion, and femoral offset. A multivariate logistic regression was used with high cobalt or chromium (greater than or equal to 7ppb) as the dependent variable. The independent variables were: female gender, UCLA activity score, age at surgery, femoral head size, time from surgery, femoral offset, acetabular abduction, and acetabular anteversion. Results. The average acetabular inclination angle was found to be 44.7° (20.6°–64.5°), and the average anteversion angle was 24° (0.2°–55.3°) (Figure 1). After controlling for the possible confounding variables, the factors contributing to elevated metal ions (≥ 7 ppb) were found to be time from surgery (OR = 1.29, p = 0.011), high abduction angle (– 55°) (OR = 4.40, p = 0.001), low anteversion angle (0°–10°) (OR = 3.82, p = 0.001), and female gender (OR = 3.45, p = 0.001). Discussion and Conclusion. We found that blood metal ion levels are affected by both acetabular inclination and anteversion (Figure 2). Furthermore, we observed that there was a high degree of variation in the positioning of these implants, and we conclude that those with high inclination and/or low anteversion angle should be most vigilantly monitored

Introduction. Implant position plays a major role in the mechanical stability of a total hip replacement. The standard modality for assessing hip component position postoperatively is a 2D anteroposterior radiograph, due to low radiation dose and low cost. Recently, the EOS® X-Ray Imaging Acquisition System has been developed as a new low-dose radiation system for measuring hip component position. EOS imaging can calculate 3D patient information from simultaneous frontal and lateral 2D radiographs of a standing patient without stitching or vertical distortion, and has been shown to be more reliable than conventional radiographs for measuring hip angles[1]. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare EOS imaging to computer tomography (CT) scans, which are the gold standard, to assess the reproducibility of hip angles. Materials and Methods. Twenty patients undergoing unilateral THA consented to this IRB-approved analysis of post-operative THA cup alignment. Standing EOS imaging and supine CT scans were taken of the same patients 6 weeks post-operatively. Postoperative cup alignment and femoral anteversion were measured from EOS radiographs using sterEOS® software. CT images of the pelvis and femur were segmented using MIMICS software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), and component position was measured using Geomagic Studio (Morrisville, NC, USA) and PTC Creo Parametric (Needham, MA). The Anterior Pelvic Plane (APP), which is defined by the two anterior superior iliac spines and the pubic symphysis, was used as an anatomic reference for acetabular inclination and anteversion. The most posterior part of the femoral condyles was used as an anatomic reference for femoral anteversion. Two blinded observers measured hip angles using sterEOS® software. Reproducibility was analysed by the Bland-Altman method, and interobserver reliability was calculated using the Cronbach's alpha (∝) coefficient of reliability. Results. The Bland-Altman analysis of test-retest reliability indicated that the 95% limits of agreement between the EOS and CT measurements ranged from −3° to 4° for acetabular inclination, from −5° to 5° for acetabular anteversion, and from −7° to 2° for femoral anteversion. The average difference between EOS measurements and CT measurements was 2° ± 2° for acetabular inclination, 3°± 2° degrees for acetabular anteversion and 4° ± 4° femoral anteversion. Interobserver agreement was good for acetabular inclination (Cronbach's α = 0.55), acetabular anteversion (Cronbach's α = 0.76) and femoral components (Cronbach's α = 0.98) using EOS imaging. Conclusions. EOS imaging can accurately and reliably measure hip component position, while exposing patients to a much lower dose of radiation than a CT scan

INTRODUCTION. Traditionally, acetabular component insertion in direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been performed using fluoroscopic guidance. Handheld navigation systems can be used to address issues of alignment, cup placement and accuracy of measurements. Previous navigation systems have been used successfully in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and has now been introduced in THA. We investigated the use of a new accelerometer-based, handheld navigation system during DAA THA to compare it to traditional means. This study aims to determine accuracy of acetabular cup placement as well as fluoroscopy times between two groups of patients. METHODS. Data was prospectively collected for a group of consecutive DAA THA procedures using a handheld navigation system (n=45) by a single surgeon. This was compared to data retrospectively collected for a group that underwent the same procedure without use of the navigation system(n=50). The time for use of the navigation system, including insertion of pins/registration, guiding cup position, and removal of pins, was recorded intraoperatively. Postoperative anteroposterior and cross-table lateral radiographs were used to measure acetabular inclination and anteversion angles. Targeted angles for all cases were 40° ±5 for inclination and 20° ±5 for anteversion. Intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure times were obtained from post-anesthesia care unit radiographs. RESULTS. Mean time of pin insertion/registration, cup positioning and removal was 180.5 seconds, 127.7 seconds and 26 seconds, giving a mean total time of 5.6 minutes. There were no significant differences in mean postoperative acetabular inclination angles between the navigation group as compared to the non-navigation group (39.8° vs 40.6°) (p = .2). There were no significant differences in mean postoperative acetabular anteversion angles between the navigation group as compared to the non-navigation group (24.3° vs 23.7°) (p=.5). Mean intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure times were significantly lower in the navigation group as compared to the non-navigation group (12.6 vs 22.2 seconds) (p<.0001). CONCLUSION. The findings demonstrated that a new handheld navigation system required minimal increase in operative time and was as accurate for cup positioning as fluoroscopically assisted DAA THA. Furthermore, there was a 45% reduction in fluoroscopy exposure time. Reduction in fluoroscopy time will lower radiation exposure for the surgeon and patients

Navigation in total hip arthroplasty has been shown to improve acetabular positioning and can decrease the incidence of mal-positioned acetabular components. The aim of this study was to assess two surgical guidance systems by comparing intra-operative measurements of acetabular component inclination and anteversion with a post-operative CT scan. We prospectively collected intra-operative navigation data from 102 hips receiving conventional THA or hip resurfacing arthroplasty through either a direct anterior or posterior approach. Two guidance systems were used simultaneously: an inertial navigation system (INS) and optical navigation system (ONS). Acetabular component anteversion and inclination was measured on a post-operative CT. The average age of the patients was 64 years (range: 24-92) and average BMI was 27 kg/m. 2. (range 19-38). 52% had hip surgery through an anterior approach. 98% of the INS measurements and 88% of the ONS measurements were within 10° of the CT measurements. The mean (and standard deviation) of the absolute difference between the post-operative CT and the intra-operative measurements for inclination and anteversion were 3.0° (2.8) and 4.5° (3.2) respectively for the ONS, along with 2.1° (2.3) and 2.4° (2.1) respectively for the INS. There was significantly lower mean absolute difference to CT for the INS when compared to ONS in both anteversion (p<0.001) and inclination (p=0.02). Both types of navigation produced reliable and reproducible acetabular cup positioning. It is important that patient-specific planning and navigation are used together to ensure that surgeons are targeting the optimal acetabular cup position. This assistance with cup positioning can provide benefits over free-hand techniques, especially in patients with an altered acetabular structure or extensive acetabular bone loss. In conclusion, both ONS and INS allowed for adequate acetabular positioning as measured on postoperative CT, and thus provide reliable intraoperative feedback for optimal acetabular component placement

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the early 1 and 2-year clinical and radiographical follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) HRA in a multi-centric Australian cohort. Patient undergoing HRA between September 2018 and April 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), HOOS Jr, WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and UCLA Activity Score were collected preoperatively and at 1- and 2-years post-operation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis/loosening and heterotopic ossification formation. 209 patients were identified of which 106 reached 2-year follow-up. Of these, 187 completed PROMS at 1 year and 90 at 2 years. There was significant improvement in HOOS (p< 0.001) and OHS (p< 0.001) between the pre-operative, 1-year and 2-years outcomes. Patients also reported improved pain (p<0.001), function (p<0.001) and reduced stiffness (p<0.001) as measured by the WOMAC score. Patients had improved activity scores on the UCLA Active Score (p<0.001) with 53% reporting return to impact activity at 2 years. FJS at 1 and 2-years were not significantly different (p=0.38). There was no migration, osteolysis or loosening of any of the implants. The mean acetabular cup inclination angle was 41.3° and the femoral component shaft angle was 137°. No fractures were reported over the 2-year follow-up with only 1 patient reporting a sciatic nerve palsy. There was early return to impact activities in more than half our patients at 2 years with no early clinical or radiological complications related to the implant. Longer term follow-up with increased patient numbers are required to restore surgeon confidence in HRA and expand the use of this novel product. In conclusion, CoC resurfacing at 2-years post-operation demonstrate promising results with satisfactory outcomes in all recorded PROMS

Imageless computer navigation systems have the potential to improve acetabular cup position in total hip arthroplasty (THA), thereby reducing the risk of revision surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of three alternate registration planes in the supine surgical position generated using imageless navigation for patients undergoing THA via the direct anterior approach (DAA). Fifty-one participants who underwent a primary THA for osteoarthritis were assessed in the supine position using both optical and inertial sensor imageless navigation systems. Three registration planes were recorded: the anterior pelvic plane (APP) method, the anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS) functional method, and the Table Tilt (TT) functional method. Post-operative acetabular cup position was assessed using CT scans and converted to radiographic inclination and anteversion. Two repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess errors and agreement of the final cup position. For inclination, the mean absolute error was lower using the TT functional method (2.4°±1.7°) than the ASIS functional method (2.8°±1.7°, ρ = .17), and the ASIS anatomic method (3.7°±2.1, ρ < .001). For anteversion, the mean absolute error was significantly lower for the TT functional method (2.4°±1.8°) than the ASIS functional method (3.9°±3.2°, ρ = .005), and the ASIS anatomic method (9.1°±6.2°, ρ < .001). All measurements were within ± 10° for the TT method, but not the ASIS functional or APP methods. A functional registration plane is preferable to an anatomic reference plane to measure intra-operative acetabular cup inclination and anteversion accurately. Accuracy may be further improved by registering patient location using their position on the operating table rather than anatomic landmarks, particularly if a tighter target window of ± 5° is desired

Background. The current orthopaedic literature demonstrates a clear relationship between acetabular component positioning, polyethylene wear and risk of dislocation following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Problems with edge loading, stripe wear and squeaking are also associated with higher acetabular inclination angles, particularly in hard-on-hard bearing implants. The important parameters of acetabular component positioning are depth, height, version and inclination. Acetabular component depth, height and version can be controlled with intra-operative reference to the transverse acetabular ligament. Control of acetabular component inclination, particularly in the lateral decubitus position, is more difficult and remains a challenge for the Orthopaedic Surgeon. Lewinnek et al described a ‘safe zone’ of acetabular component orientation: Radiological acetabular inclination of 40 ± 10° and radiological anteversion of 15 ± 10°. Accurate implantation of the acetabular component within the ‘safe zone’ of radiological inclination is dependent on operative inclination, operative version and pelvic position. Traditionally during surgery, the acetabular component has been inserted with an operative inclination of 45°. This assumes that patient positioning is correct and does not take into account the impact of operative anteversion or patient malpositioning. However, precise patient positioning in order to orientate acetabular components using this method cannot always be relied upon. Hill et al demonstrated a mean 6.9° difference between photographically simulated radiological inclination and the post-operative radiological inclination. The most likely explanation was felt to be adduction of the uppermost hemipelvis in the lateral decubitus position. The study changed the practice of the senior author, with target operative inclination now 35° rather than 40° as before, aiming to achieve a post-operative radiological inclination of 42° ± 5°. Aim. To determine which of the following three techniques of acetabular component implantation most accurately obtains a desired operative inclination of 35 degrees:. Freehand. Modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide, or. Digital inclinometer assisted. Methods. 270 patients undergoing primary uncemented THA were randomised to one of the three methods of acetabular component implantation. Target operative inclination for all three techniques was 35°. Operative inclination was measured intra-operatively using both a digital inclinometer and stereophotogrammetric system. For both the freehand and Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation techniques, the surgeon was blinded to intra-operative digital inclinometer readings. Results. The freehand implantation technique had an operative inclination range of 25.2 – 43.2° (Mean 32.9°, SD 2.90°). The modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation technique had an operative inclination range of 29.3 – 39.3° (Mean 33.7°, SD 1.89°). The digital inclinometer assisted technique had an operative inclination range of 27.5 – 37.5° (Mean 34.0°, SD 1.57°). Mean unsigned deviation from target 35° operative inclination was 2.92° (SD 2.03) for the freehand implantation technique, 1.83° (SD 1.41) for the modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation technique and 1.28° (SD 1.33) for the digital inclinometer assisted technique. Conclusions. When aiming for 35° of operative inclination, the digital inclinometer technique appears more accurate than either the freehand or Mechanical Alignment Guide techniques. In order to improve accuracy of acetabular component orientation during Total Hip Arthroplasty, the surgeon should consider using such a technique

In order to avoid complications of hip arthroplasty such as dislocation, impingement and eccentric liner wear accurate acetabular orientation is essential. The three-dimensional assessment of acetabular cup orientation using two-dimensional plain radiographs is inaccurate. The aim of this study was to develop a CT-based protocol to accurately measure postoperative acetabular cup inclination and anteversion establishing which bony reference points facilitate the most accurate estimation of these variables. An all-polyethylene acetabular liner was implanted into a cadaveric acetabulum. A conventional pelvic CT scan was performed and reformatted images created in both functional and anterior pelvic planes. CT images were transferred to a Freedom-Plus Graphics software package enabling an identical, virtual, three dimensional model of the cadaveric pelvis to be created. Using a computer interface this model could be ‘palpated’, bony landmarks accurately identified and definitive acetabular cup orientation established. Using original CT scans, acetabular cup inclination and anteversion were measured on five occasions by eight radiographers using differing predetermined bony landmarks as reference points. The intra- and inter-observer variation in measurement of acetabular cup orientation using varying bony reference points was assessed in comparison to the previously elucidated definitive cup position. Statistical analysis using appropriate ANOVA models was performed in order to assess the significance of the results obtained. Virtually derived definitive acetabular cup orientation was measured showing cup inclination and anteversion as 41.0 and 22.5 degrees respectively. Mean CT-based measurement of cup inclination and anteversion by eight radiographers were 43.1 and 20.8 degrees respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in intra- and inter-observer recorded results. No statistically significant differences were found when using different bony landmarks for the measurement of inclination and anteversion (p= 0.255 and 0.324 respectively). CT assessment of acetabular component inclination and anteversion is accurate, reliable and reproducible when measured using differing bony landmarks as reference points. We recommend measuring acetabular inclination and anteversion from the inferior acetabular wall/teardrop and posterior ischium respectively. The Perth CT hip protocol is easily reproducible in the clinical setting both in the routine assessment of hip arthroplasty patients and as research tool. In our unit its initial application will be to validate commercially available hip navigation systems

The success of total hip replacement (THR) is closely linked to the positioning of the acetabular component. Malalignment increases rates of dislocation, impingement, acetabular migration, pelvic osteolysis, leg length discrepancy and polyethylene wear. Many surgeons orientate the cup in the same anteversion and inclination as the inherent anatomy of the acetabulum. The transverse acetabular ligament and acetabular rim can be used as a reference points for orientating the cup this way. Low rates of dislocation have been reported using this technique. Detailed understanding of the anatomy and orientation of the acetabulum in arthritic hips is therefore very important. The aim of this study was to describe the anteversion and inclination of the inherent acetabulum in arthritic hips and to identify the number that fall out with the ‘safe zone’ of acetabular position described by Lewinnek et al. (anteversion 15°±10°; inclination 40°±10°). A series of 65 hips, all with symptomatic osteoarthritis undergoing THR were investigated. Patients with developmental dysplastia of hip (DDH) were excluded. All patients had a navigated THR as part of their normal clinical treatment. A posterior approach to the hip was used. A commercially available non image based computer navigation system (Orthopilot BBraun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used. Rigid bodies (using active trackers) were attached to pelvis and femur. Anterior pelvic plane was registered using the two anterior superior iliac spines and pubic symphysis. The femoral head dislocated and removed and the labrum and soft tissue were excised to clear floor and rim of the acetabulum. Inner size of the empty acetabulum was sized with cup trials and appropriately size trial fixed with a computer tracker was then aligned in the orientation of the natural acetabulum as defined by the acetabular rim ignoring any osteophytes. The inclination and anteversion were calculated by the software. Surgery then proceeded with guidance of the computer navigation system. The computer software defines the anatomical values of orientation, to allow comparison with radiographs these were converted to radiological values as described by Murray et al. The acetabular inclination in all hips was also measured on pre-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. This was done using digital radiographs analysed with the PACS system (Kodak, Carestream PACS Client, version 10.0). Acetabular inclination was measured using as the angle between a line passing through the superior and inferior rim of the acetabulum and a line parallel to the pelvis as identified by the tear drops, using the method described by Atkinson et al. All patients were Caucasian and had primary osteoarthritis. There were 29 males and 36 females. The average age was 68 years (SD 8). Mean anteversion was 9.3° (SD 10.3°). Anteversion for males was significantly lower than females with a mean difference of −5.5° (95%CI −10.5°,−0.5°) p = 0.033 but there was no significant difference in the number falling outside the “safe zone”. Mean inclination was 50.4° (SD 7.4°). There was no significant difference between males and females with respect to inclination angle or the number that fell outside the “safe zone”. Overall 69% of patients had a combined inclination and anteversion of the native acetabulum that fell outside the “safe zone” of Lewinnek. Mean acetabular inclination falls out with the ‘safe zone’. This trend has been seen in a recent study of arthritic hips using CT scans which found that the average angle of inclination in both males and females was greater than the upper limit of the safe zone. This study using CT also demonstrated a statistically significant 5.5° difference between males and females in terms of anteversion. This is the same as the figure we have found in our work. Inherent acetabular orientation in arthritic hips falls out with the safe zone defined by Lewinnek in 69% of cases. When using the natural acetabular orientation as a guide for positioning implants it should therefore not be assumed this will fall with in the safe zone although the validity of safe zones itself is questionable. Variation between patients must be taken into account and the difference between males and females, particularly in terms of anteversion, should also be considered

Medical and Health care products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) released an alert in 2010 regarding metal on metal (MoM) bearings in hip arthroplasty owing to soft tissue reactions to Metal debris. Following this, we adopted a targeted screening protocol to review patients with this bearing couple. 218 Patients (252 hips), mean age 53.2 (25–71) years were assessed clinically using Oxford hip score (OHS) and X-ray examination. The mean follow up was 44.5 (12–71) months. Patients were considered at higher risk (118 patients/133 hips) if they had deterioration of OHS (50 hips), Small sized heads <50mm (114 hips), acetabular inclination >500 (37 hips), neck thinning (17 hips). These patients (107/118), (120/133 hips) were further investigated through measuring metal ion levels and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The mean blood levels of cobalt and chromium in this group were 6.7, 8.62 ug/L respectively. Metal ions increased significantly with high acetabular inclination angles (p=0.01, 0.004 respectively), but was not affected by the size of the head (p=0.13). MRI showed periprosthetic lesions around 28 hips (26 fluid collections, 2 pseudotumours). The screening protocol detected all patients who subsequently required elective revision. We believe that this protocol was beneficial in detecting problematic MoM hip replacements

Introduction. Success of total hip replacement (THR) is closely linked to positioning of the acetabular component. Malalignment increases complication rates. Our aim was to describe the anteversion and inclination of the inherent acetabulum in arthritic hips and identify the number that fall out with the ‘safe zone’ of acetabular position described by Lewinnek et al. (anteversion 15±10 degrees; inclination 40±10 degrees). Materials/Methods. A series of 65 hips undergoing non-image based computer navigated THR for Osteoarthritis were investigated. Anteversion and inclination was measured with the help of cup trials fixed with computer trackers aligned in orientation of the natural acetabulum. The acetabular inclination in all hips was measured on pre-operative digital radiographs. Results. There were 29 males and 36 females with average age of 68 years. Anteversion of males was significantly lower than females with a mean difference of −5.5 degrees (95% CI-10.5–0.5 degrees) with p value of 0.033. There was no significant difference with respect to inclination. Overall 69 % of patients had a combined inclination and anteversion that fell outside the ‘safe zone’. Conclusion. Mean acetabular inclination falls outwith the ‘safe zone’ but mean anteversion falls within. The inherent acetabular anatomy of arthritic hips varies widely. Females have significantly more anteversion. Care should be taken when using inherent anatomy of acetabulum as a guide when doing a THR

Introduction. Adverse wear related failure (AWRF) after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has been described as a new failure mechanism. We describe the results of revision of these failures. Methods. Between July 1999 and Jan 2014, a single surgeon performed 3407 HRA. Nine (9/3407; 0.3%) cases in 8 patients were revised due to AWRF. In two additional revisions for AWRF the primary HRA was done elsewhere. There were a total of 11 revisions (9 women, 2 men) for AWRF cases reported in this study. The primary diagnoses were OA in 7 and dysplasia in 4. At the time of the primary surgery, the average age was 50±5 years and the average BMI was 27±4. The average femoral component sizes were 46±3mm. Only the acetabular component was revised in eight cases, both components were revised in 4 cases (revised to THA), three of these four used metal on metal bearings. A postop CT was requested for all patients after revision. 4 scans were of sufficient quality to analyze implant positions. Algorithms for metal artifact reduction were utilized to obtain high quality 2D images (Figure 1); 3D CAD models of the bones and implants were regenerated in order to calculate the acetabular inclination and anteversion angle (Figure 2). Results. Prior to revision, all 11 cases had acetabular inclination angles on standing radiographs (AIA) greater than 50° (mean 56. 0. range: 51°-60°) and Cobalt blood levels greater than 10ug/L (mean 94±64ug/L, range: 12–173 ug/L). Chromium levels were a mean of 50±33ug/L (range: 8–111 ug/L). 3D studies showed fluid collections and metalosis was seen in all cases. The mean follow-up length after revision was 2.4±1 years. In 4 cases the postop CT could be used to accurately measure implant positions resulting in a mean AIA=34°±9° and a mean anteversion angle of 18°±4°. Metal ion tests were available for 7 cases at least 1 year after revision. Cobalt levels were reduced to a mean of 4.1±3.1 ug/L (range: 1.5–6.2 ug/L) and Chromium levels fell to 6.3±2.9 ug/L (range: 3.4–10.9 ug/L). The mean HHS was 93±15. There was one failure of acetabular component fixation, which required repeat revision. Her latest HHS was 100 one year after the second surgery. For all revisions, the mean operative time was 123±15 min, incision length was 5±1 inches, estimated blood loss was 258±82 cc, and hospital stay was 1.3±0.5 days. There were no other major complications including no nerve palsies, vascular injuries or abductor mechanism disruptions. No patients limped. Conclusion. Our study suggests AWRF in HRA can successfully be revised with metal-on-metal surfaces. Revision of the femoral component is not necessary despite the abnormal wear. Correction of the steep AIA is the key to success. This confirms the concept that edge loading, leading to a high wear state, rather than allergy to metal is the cause of these failures

There are numerous factors that influence total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability including surgical approach, soft-tissue tensioning, impingement, abductor status, and component positioning. A long-held tenet regarding acetabular component positioning is that cup inclination and anteversion of 40 ± 10 degrees and 15 ± 10 degrees, respectively, represents a “safe zone” as to minimise dislocation after primary THA. However, several studies have recently challenged that notion for individual patients. A study completed by Abdel et al. identified a cohort of 9784 primary THAs performed at a single institution with 206 THAs (2%) that subsequently dislocated. The authors determined that 58% of the dislocated THAs had their acetabular component within the safe zone for both acetabular inclination and anteversion. When looked at separately, 84% had their inclination within the safe zone (mean value of 44 ± 8 degrees), and 69% had their anteversion within the safe zone (mean value of 15 ± 9 degrees). As such, surgeons should take into account that cup positioning alone does not determine the risk of instability following THA, as there are a multitude of other factors that can contribute to dislocation. Hip stability is multifactorial and likely patient-specific, and must take into account bony and muscular anatomy, static and dynamic soft tissue balance and intraoperative tensioning, and the functional demand and rehabilitative efforts of the patient

Two critical steps in achieving optimal results and minimizing complications (dislocation, lengthening, and intraoperative fracture) are careful preoperative planning and more recently, the option of intraoperative imaging in order to optimise accurate and reproducible total hip replacement. The important issues to ascertain are relative limb length, offset and center of rotation. It is important to start the case knowing the patient's perception of their limb length. Patient perception is equally important, if not more important, than the radiographic assessment. On the acetabular side, the teardrop should be identified and the amount of reaming necessary to place the inferior margin of the acetabular component adjacent to the tear drop should be noted. Superiorly the amount of exposed metal that is expected to be seen during surgery should be measured in millimeters. Once the key issues of limb length, offset, center of rotation, and acetabular component position relative to the native acetabulum have been confirmed along with the expected sizing of the acetabular and femoral components, it is critical that the operative plan is reproduced at the time of surgery and this can best be consistently performed with the use of intraoperative imaging. Advances in digital imaging now make efficient, cost-effective assessment of hip replacement possible. Embedded software allows accurate confirmation of the preoperative plan intraoperatively when correction of potential errors is easily possible. Such technology is now mature after years of clinical use and studies have confirmed its success in avoiding outliers and achieving optimal results. A pilot study at Washington University demonstrated that intraoperative imaging was able to eliminate outliers for acetabular inclination and anteversion. In addition, the ability to achieve accurate reproduction of femoral offset and limb length within 5mm was three times better with intraoperative imaging (P < 0.001)

Introduction. Primary stability is achieved by the press fit technique, where an oversized component is inserted into an undersized reamed cavity. The major geometric design of an acetabular shell is hemispherical type. On the other one, there are the hemielliptical type acetabular shells for enhanced peripheral contact. In the case of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the aseptic loosening may be induced by instability due to decreased in the contact area between the acetabular shell and host bone. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of reaming size on the primary stability of two different outer geometry shells in DDH models. Materials and methods. The authors evaluated hemispherical (Continuum Acetabular Shell, Zimmer Biomet G.K.) and hemielliptical (Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular Shell, Zimmer Biomet G.K.) acetabular shells. Both shells had a 50 mm outer diameter and same tantalum 3D highly porous surface. An acetabular bone model was prepared using a solid rigid polyurethane foam block with 20 pcf density (Sawbones, Pacific Research Laboratories Inc.) as a synthetic bone substrate. Press fit conditions were every 1 mm from 4 mm under reaming to 2 mm over reaming. To simulate the acetabular dysplasia the synthetic bone substrate was cut diagonally at 40°. Where, the acetabular inclination and cup-CE angle were assumed to 40° and 10°, respectively. Acetabular components were installed with 5 kN by a uniaxial universal testing machine (Autograph AGS-X, Shimadzu Corporation). Primary stability was evaluated by lever-out test. The lever-out test was performed in 4 mm undersized to 2 mm oversized reaming conditions. Lever out moment was calculated from the multiplication of the maximum load and the moment arm for primary stability of the shell. The sample size was 6 for each shell type. Results. The hemisphererical acetabular shell had the maximum lever out moment in 3 mm under reaming condition (7.4 ± 0.4 N·m). The hemielliptical acetabular shell had the maximum lever out moment in 1 mm under reaming condition (8.7 ± 0.8 N·m). Furthermore, the lever out moment of the hemielliptical acetabular shell was significantly 1.2 times greater by the t-test than the hemispherical acetabular shell under the maximum primary fixation conditions. Discussion. The risk parameter of the acetabular loosening is indicated the lack of lateral bony support. The hemielliptical shell was not adversely effected more than the hemispherical shell. Furthermore, the reaming condition of the most primary fixation on the hemielliptical shell was 1 mm under reaming, and was a more general operating procedure than the hemispherical shell (3 mm under reaming). From this study, it was suggested that the hemielliptical shell might be expected excellent clinical outcomes in severe acetabular dysplasia hips. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Background. There is much research on metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) but few studies have reported the outcome with respect to implant characteristics from non-specialist centres. Aim. To report the survival, clinical and radiological outcomes of a single surgeon series of HRA with an average follow-up of 5 years. Methods. All consecutive HRAs performed by a single surgeon between 2002–2010 at a district general hospital were examined clinically and radiologically. The median follow-up was 61 months (12–102). Clinical assessment included the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and University of Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score. Radiological assessment included implant position and various bony changes. Survival was defined as a need for revision of either component. Results. There were 75 HRA procedures (59 patients): 70 Birmingham, 2 Conserve, 2 Adept and 1 ASR. The median age was 58 years (25–75) with 46.7% (35) male and 53.3% (40) female. 4.2% (3) patients were lost to follow-up. The mean acetabular and femoral implant sizes were 54.8mm (48–64) and 48.2mm (42–58) respectively. The mean acetabular and femoral inclination angle was 45.4° (20.8–75.2°) and 138° (133–149.5°) respectively. Survival rate was 92% with 6 revisions due to aseptic loosening (3) and fracture (3). These failures were all predominantly female (5) with significantly smaller mean acetabular (50mm, p=0.036) and femoral (43.3mm, p=0.038) implant sizes. Moreover, they had a higher mean acetabular inclination angle of 47.8° (p=0.27). The mean OHS was 43.5 (25–48) and the mean UCLA activity score was 6.7 (3–10). Radiological findings included heterotopic ossification in 21.6% (16), radiolucent lines in 6.8% (5), femoral neck thinning in 2.7% (2) and notching in 5.4% (4). Discussion. HRA has been shown to have comparable clinical and radiological short-medium term outcomes in a non-specialist centre using different implants. Failed procedure rate is high and patients were predominantly female, with significantly smaller implants and a higher acetabular inclination angle. Vigilance is therefore required in case selection and in follow-up for such patients