Introduction. Most of studies on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) are focused on acetabular cup orientation. Even though the literature suggests that femoral anteversion and combined anteversion have a clinical impact on THA stability, there are not many reports on these parameters. Combined anteversion can be considered morphologically as the addition of anatomical acetabular and femoral anteversions (Anatomical Combined Anatomical Anteversion ACA). It is also possible to evaluate the Combined Functional Anteversion (CFA) generated by the relative functional position of femoral and acetabular implants while standing. This preliminary study is focused on the comparison of the anatomical and functional data in asymptomatic THA patients. Material and methods. 50 asymptomatic unilateral THA patients (21 short stems and 29 standard stems) have been enrolled. All patients underwent an EOS low dose evaluation in standing position. SterEOS software was used for the 3D measurements of cup and femur orientation. Cup anatomical anteversion (CAA) was computed as the cup anteversion in axial plane perpendicular to the Anterior Pelvic Plane. Femoral anatomical anteversion (FAA) was computed as the angle between the femoral neck axis and the posterior femoral condyles in a plane perpendicular to femoral mechanical axis. Functional anteversions for the cup (CFA) and femur (FFA) were measured in the horizontal axial patient plane in standing position. Both anatomical and functional cumulative anteversions were calculated as a sum. All 3D measures were evaluated and compared for the repeatability and reproducibility. Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U-test considering the non-normal distribution of data and the short number of patients (<30 for each group). Results. Functional cumulative anteversion was significantly higher than anatomical cumulative anteversion for all groups (p<0.05). No significant difference could be noted between the cases according to the use of short or standard stems. Conclusion. This study shows the difference of functional implant orientation as compared to the anatomical measurements. This preliminary study has limitations. First the limited sample of patients. Then this series only includes asymptomatic subjects. Nevertheless, this work focused on the feasibility of the measurements shows the potential interest of a functional analysis of cumulated anteversion. Standing position influences the relative position of THA implants according to the frontal and sagittal orientation of the pelvis. The relevance of these functional measurements in instability cases must be demonstrated, especially in patients with anterior subluxation in standing position which is potentially associated with pelvic adaptative extension. Further studies are needed for the feasibility of measurements on EOS images in sitting position and their analysis in case of instability. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Aseptic acetabular component failure rates have been reported to be similar or even slightly higher than femoral component failure. Obtaining proper initial stability by press fitting the cementless acetabular cup into an undersized cavity is crucial to allow for secondary osseous integration. However, finding the insertion endpoint that corresponds to an optimal initial stability is challenging. This in vitro study presents an alternative method that allows tracking the insertion progress of acetabular implants in a non-destructive, real-time manner. Materials and Methods. A simplified acetabular bone model was used for a series of insertion experiments. The bone model consisted of polyurethane solid foam blocks (Sawbones #1522-04 and #1522-05) into which a hemispherical cavity and cylindrical wall, representing the acetabular rim, were machined using a computer numerically controlled (CNC) milling machine (Haas Automation Inc., Oxnard, CA, USA). Fig. 1 depicts the bone model and setup used. A total of 10 insertions were carried out, 5 on a low density block, 5 on a high density block. The acetabular cups were press fitted into the bone models by succeeding hammer hits. The acceleration of the implant-insertor combination was measured using 2 shock accelerometers mounted on the insertor during the insertion process (PCB 350C03, PCB Depew, NY, USA). The force applied to the implant-insertor combination was also measured. 15 hammer hits were applied per insertion experiment. Two features were extracted from the acceleration time signal; total signal energy (E) and signal length (LS). Two features and one correlation measure were extracted from the acceleration frequency spectra; the relative signal power in the low frequency band (PL, from 500–2500Hz) and the signal power in the high frequency band (P Hf, from 4000–4800 Hz). The changes in the low frequency spectra (P Lf, from 500–2500 Hz) between two steps were tracked by calculating the Frequency Response Assurance Criterion (FRAC). Force features similar to the ones proposed by Mathieu et al., 2013 were obtained from the force time data. The convergence behavior of the features was tracked as insertion progressed. Results. Differences were noted visually between the acceleration data recorded at the beginning of insertion and towards the end, both in the time domain (fig. 2A) as well as in the frequency domain (fig. 2B). These differences were also captured by the proposed features. Fig. 3 shows a typical representation of how the time (A), frequency (B) and force (C) features evolved during insertion. Based on a simple convergence criterion, the insertion endpoint could be determined. Conclusions. The convergence behavior, and the insertion endpoint thus identified, of the force-based and acceleration based features correlated well. The different features capture the changes in damping and stiffness of the implant-bone system that are occurring as the insertion progresses and combining them improves the robustness of the endpoint detection method. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Purpose:

Crosslinking of polyethylene has become synonymous with longevity in total hip replacement. In the USA 70–85% of all polyethylene cups underwent crosslinking since 2008. Three publications appeared in the autumn 2011 volume of the “SA Orthopaedic Journal,” on the 10–33 year follow-up of the original SA crosslinked implant. The purpose of this study is to illustrate and confirm statistically, the improvement of the bone cement interface, provided that wear of polyethylene can be reduced to an absolute minimum.

We present the indications and outcomes of a series of custom 3D printed titanium acetabular implants used over a 9 year period at our institution (Sydney, Australia), in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty. Individualised image-based case planning with additive manufacturing of pelvic components was combined with screw fixation and off-the-shelf femoral components to treat patients presenting with failed hip arthroplasty involving acetabular bone loss. Retrospective chart review was performed on the practices of three contributing surgeons, with an initial search by item number of the Medicare Benefits Scheme linked to a case list maintained by the manufacturer. An analysis of indications, patient demographics and clinical outcome was performed. The cohort comprised 65.2% female with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range 61–77) and a median follow up of 32.9 months (IQR 13.1 - 49.7). The indications for surgery were infection (12.5%); aseptic loosening (78.1%) and fracture (9.4%), with 65.7% of cases undergoing previous revision hip arthroplasty. A tumour prosthesis was implanted into the proximal femur in 21.9% of cases. Complications were observed in 31.3% of cases, with four cases requiring revision procedures and no deaths reported in this series. Kaplan-Meier analysis of all-cause revision revealed an overall procedure survival of 88.7% at two years (95%confidence interval 69 - 96.2) and 83.8% (95%CI 62 - 93.7) at five years, with pelvic implant-specific survival of 98% (95%CI 86.6 - 99.7) at two and five year follow up. We conclude that an individualised planning approach for custom 3D printed titanium acetabular implants can provide high overall and implant-specific survival at up to five years follow up in complex cases of failed hip arthroplasty and acetabular bone loss

Introduction. Acetabular component loosening with associated bone loss is a challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. Trabecular Metal (TM) by Zimmer Biomet has been shown to have greater implant survivorship for all-cause acetabular revision in small cohort retrospective studies. Our study aims to review outcomes of acetabular TM implants locally. Method. This is a retrospective observational study using data from Auckland City and North Shore Hospitals from 1st of January 2010 to 31st of December 2020. Primary outcome is implant survivorship (re-revision acetabular surgery for any cause) demonstrated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary outcome is indication for index revision and re-revision surgery. Multivariate analysis used to identify statistically significant factors for re-revision surgery. Results. 225 cases used acetabular TM implants (shells and/or augments) over 10 years. Indications include aseptic loosening (63%), instability (15%) and infection (13%). Of these, 12% (n=28) had further re-revision for infection (54%) and instability (21%). Median time to re-revision was 156 days (range 11 – 2022). No cases of re-revision were due to failure of bony ingrowth or acetabular component loosening. Ethnicity, smoking status, and age were not risk factors for re-revision procedures. Additionally, previous prosthetic joint infection, ethnicity, sex and age were not significant risk factors for re-revision due to infection. Implant survivorship was 80% at 1 year, 71% at 5 years and 64% at 10 years. Discussion. Main indications for re-revision were infection and instability. Demographic factors and co-morbidities did not correlate with increased re-revision risk. Survivorship is poorer compared to cumulative survivorship reported by the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Explanations are multifactorial and possibly contributed by underestimation of true revision rates by registry data. Conclusions. We need to identify alternate causes for poorer survivorship and review the role of TM implants in acetabular revision within our specified population

Introduction. Revision total hip arthroplasty is a complex procedure and becoming more common. Acetabular implant loosening or fracture has previously been treated with a cup and cage construct. Recent studies have shown significant failure rates with Cup Cage constructs in more complex 3B and 3C Acetabular revisions. As a result the use of 3D printed custom made acetabular components has become more common. Method. We present 5 cases with severe acetabular bone loss that were treated with 3D printed acetabular components. The components were manufactured by OSSIS medical in New Zealand. The patient's original femoral stem was retained in all cases. Pre operatively the implant design was approved by the arthroplasty team prior to final manufacture. Implants were provided with a sterilisable model used intraoperatively for reference. Results. Five cases of 3D printed acetabular implants have been used locally for complex revision total hip arthroplasty with no immediate intraoperative or postoperative complications. Follow up of 1 – 5 years. One patient fell, five years post operatively. Sustaining a periprosthetic femur fracture requiring plate fixation, however, the acetabular component remained stable. No patient has undergone surgery for any failure of the acetabular component. Conclusions. This study shows 3D printed custom acetabular implants are efficient and effective in our hands. Early results from the design team suggest improved results compared to TM cup / cage systems. None of the implants have failed for any reason to date

Introduction. It is well accepted that larger heads provide more stability in total hip arthroplasty. This is due to an increase in jump height providing increased resistance to subluxation. However, other implant parameters also contribute to the bearing's stability. Specifically, the liner's rim design and the centre of rotation relative to the liner's face. Both these features contribute to define the Cup Articular Arc Angle (CAAA). The CAAA describes the degree of dysplasia of the acetabular liner, and plays an important role in defining the jump height. The aim of this study was to determine the difference in jump height between bearing materials with a commonly used acetabular implant system. Methods. From 3D models of the Trinity acetabular implant system (Corin, UK), the CAAA was measured in CAD software (SolidWorks, Dassault Systems, France) for the ceramic, poly and modular dual mobility (DM) liners, for cup sizes 46mm to 64mm. The most commonly used bearing size was used in the analysis of each cup size. For the ceramic and poly liners, a 36mm bearing was used for cups 50mm and above. For the 46mm and 48mm cups, a 32mm bearing was used. The DM liners were modelled with the largest head size possible. Using a published equation, the jump height was calculated for each of the three bearing materials and each cup size. Cup inclination and anteversion were kept constant. Results. CAAA varied substantially between cup sizes and bearing materials. The mean CAAA for the ceramic, poly and DM bearings were 166°, 175° and 186°, respectively. Consequently, over the entire size range, the ceramic liners had the lowest mean jump height of 12.9mm. In comparison to the ceramic liner, there was a mean 10% increase in jump height when transitioning to a poly (14.2mm), and a further 30% increase when transitioning from a poly to the dual mobility bearing (18.5mm) [Fig.1]. However, the difference in jump heights between bearings was variable, and dependent on cup size. Discussion. It is well understood that increasing head size increases stability in THA. However, other implant design parameters contribute to stability. With this particular implant system, the poly bearing had a greater jump height than the ceramic for cup sizes 50mm and above. The DM bearing improved jump height over the ceramic and poly by a mean of 41% and 30%, respectively. In conclusion, different liners have different design features that affect jump height. Consequently, not all bearings of identical head size are the same. We encourage a dialogue with your implant provider to understand the differences in CAAA between cup sizes and bearing materials. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The reconstruction of peri-acetabular defects after severe bone loss or pelvic resection for tumor is among the most challenging surgical intervention. The Lumic® prosthesis (Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany) was first introduced in 2008 in an effort to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with the classic peri-acetabular reconstruction techniques and to improve functional outcomes. Few have evaluated the results associated with the use of this recent implant. A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. Every patient in whom a Lumic® endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction after peri-acetabular resection or severe bone loss with a minimal follow-up of three months was included. The charts were reviewed and data concerning patients’ demographics, peri-operative characteristics and post-operative complications was collected. Surgical and functional outcomes were also assessed. Sixteen patients, 11 males and five females, were included and were followed for 28 months [3 – 60]. Mean age was 55 [17–86], and mean BMI reached 28 [19.6 – 44]. Twelve patients (75%) had a Lumic® after a resection of a primary sarcoma, two following pelvic metastasis, one for a benign tumor and one after a comminuted acetabular fracture with bone loss. Twelve patients (75%) had their surgery performed in one stage whereas four had a planned two-stage procedure. Mean surgical time was 555 minutes [173-1230] and blood loss averaged 2100 mL [500-5000]. MSTS score mean was 60.3 preoperatively [37.1 – 97] and 54.3 postoperatively [17.1-88.6]. Five patients (31.3%) had a cemented Lumic® stem. All patients got the dual mobility bearing, and 10 patients (62.5%) had the largest acetabular cup implanted (60 mm). In seven of these 10 patients the silver coated implant was used to minimize risk of infection. Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a synthetic fabric aiming to reduce the dislocation risk. Five patients had per-operative complications (31.3%), four were minor and one was serious (comminuted iliac bone fracture requiring internal fixation). Four patients dislocated within a month post-operatively and one additional patient sustained a dislocation one year post-operatively. Eight patients (50%) had a post-operative surgical site infection. All four patients who had a two-stage surgery had an infection. Ten patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation (two for fabric insertion, five for wash-outs, and three for implant exchange/removal). One patient (6.3%) had a septic loosening three years after surgery. At the time of data collection, 13 patients (81.3%) were alive with nine free of disease. Silver coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p=0.2) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p=1). These results are comparable to the sparse data published. Lumic® endoprosthesis is therefore shown to provide good functional outcomes and low rates of loosening on short to medium term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and of the use of silver coated implants. Larger series and longer follow-ups are needed

The reconstruction of peri-acetabular defects after severe bone loss or pelvic resection for tumor is among the most challenging surgical intervention. The Lumic® prosthesis (Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany) was first introduced in 2008 in an effort to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with the classic peri-acetabular reconstruction techniques and to improve functional outcomes. Few have evaluated the results associated with the use of this recent implant. A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. Every patient in whom a Lumic® endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction after peri-acetabular resection or severe bone loss with a minimal follow-up of three months was included. The charts were reviewed and data concerning patients’ demographics, peri-operative characteristics and post-operative complications was collected. Surgical and functional outcomes were also assessed. Sixteen patients, 11 males and five females, were included and were followed for 28 months [3 – 60]. Mean age was 55 [17-86], and mean BMI reached 28 [19.6 – 44]. Twelve patients (75%) had a Lumic® after a resection of a primary sarcoma, two following pelvic metastasis, one for a benign tumor and one after a comminuted acetabular fracture with bone loss. Twelve patients (75%) had their surgery performed in one stage whereas four had a planned two-stage procedure. Mean surgical time was 555 minutes [173-1230] and blood loss averaged 2100 mL [500-5000]. MSTS score mean was 60.3 preoperatively [37.1 – 97] and 54.3 postoperatively [17.1-88.6]. Five patients (31.3%) had a cemented Lumic® stem. All patients got the dual mobility bearing, and 10 patients (62.5%) had the largest acetabular cup implanted (60 mm). In seven of these 10 patients the silver coated implant was used to minimize risk of infection. Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a synthetic fabric aiming to reduce the dislocation risk. Five patients had per-operative complications (31.3%), four were minor and one was serious (comminuted iliac bone fracture requiring internal fixation). Four patients dislocated within a month post-operatively and one additional patient sustained a dislocation one year post-operatively. Eight patients (50%) had a post-operative surgical site infection. All four patients who had a two-stage surgery had an infection. Ten patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation (two for fabric insertion, five for wash-outs, and three for implant exchange/removal). One patient (6.3%) had a septic loosening three years after surgery. At the time of data collection, 13 patients (81.3%) were alive with nine free of disease. Silver coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p=0.2) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p=1). These results are comparable to the sparse data published. Lumic® endoprosthesis is therefore shown to provide good functional outcomes and low rates of loosening on short to medium term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and of the use of silver coated implants. Larger series and longer follow-ups are needed

Acetabular implant position is important for the stability, function, and long-term wear properties of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior studies of acetabular implant positioning have demonstrated a high percentage of outliers, even in experienced hip surgeons, when conventional instruments are used. Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in (THA, as it has been shown to improve the precision of acetabular component placement and reduce the incidence of outliers. However, computer navigation with imageless, large-console systems is costly and often interrupts the surgeon's workflow, and thus, has not been widely adopted. Another method to improve acetabular component positioning during THA is the use of fluoroscopy with the direct anterior approach. Studies have demonstrated that the supine position of the patient during surgery facilitates the use of fluoroscopic guidance, thus improving acetabular component position. A handheld, accelerometer based navigation unit for use in total hip replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in positioning the acetabular component during anterior approach THA, potentially reducing the need for intraoperative fluoroscopic studies. We sought to compare the radiographic results of direct anterior THA performed with conventional instrumentation vs. handheld navigation to determine the accuracy of the navigation unit, and to see whether or not there was a reduction in the fluoroscopic time used during surgery. Furthermore, we timed the use of the navigation unit to see whether or not it required a substantial addition to surgical time. Our results demonstrate that a handheld navigation unit used during anterior approach THA had no difference with regard to acetabular cup positioning when compared to fluoroscopically assisted THA, but led to a reduction in the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy time

Acetabular implant position is important for the stability, function, and long-term wear properties of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior studies of acetabular implant positioning have demonstrated a high percentage of outliers, even in experienced hip surgeons, when conventional instruments are used. Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in THA, as it has been shown to improve the precision of acetabular component placement and reduce the incidence of outliers. However, computer navigation with imageless, large-console systems is costly and often interrupts the surgeon's workflow, and thus, has not been widely adopted. Another method to improve acetabular component positioning during THA is the use of fluoroscopy with the direct anterior approach. Studies have demonstrated that the supine position of the patient during surgery facilitates the use of fluoroscopic guidance, thus improving acetabular component position. A handheld, accelerometer-based navigation unit for use in total hip replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in positioning the acetabular component during anterior approach THA, potentially reducing the need for intra-operative fluoroscopic studies. We sought to compare the radiographic results of direct anterior THA performed with conventional instrumentation vs. handheld navigation to determine the accuracy of the navigation unit, and to see whether or not there was a reduction in the fluoroscopic time used during surgery. Furthermore, we timed the use of the navigation unit to see whether or not it required a substantial addition to surgical time. Our results demonstrate that a handheld navigation unit used during anterior approach THA had no difference with regard to acetabular cup positioning when compared to fluoroscopically assisted THA, but led to a reduction in the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy time

Introduction. Cementless acetabular fixation in total hip replacement (THA) is reliable and has been the fixation method of choice in the United States for decades. While revision for failure of osseointegration or early loosening is relatively rare, recurrent dislocation remains a leading cause of early revision. Novel acetabular implants and those offered by smaller companies often lack constrained or dual mobility liners, which may result in revision of well-fixed, well-positioned cups in cases of recurrent dislocation. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of THA with three different acetabular cups with differing fixation surfaces. One hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cup (Trident, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) offered dual mobility or constrained liner options. The other cups were a novel highly porous cup (Restoris PST, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and a Calcium Phosphate (CaP)-coated cup (Trinity, Corin, Cirincester, UK), neither of which offered dual mobility or constrained options at the time of investigation. Endpoints of interest were: clinical and radiographic outcomes including evidence of osseointegration, overall reoperations, reoperations for acetabular fixation failure, and reoperations to address dislocation in which a well-positioned shell was revised due to the lack of dual mobility or constrained options. Methods. A retrospective review of 370 acetabular cups implanted in 328 patients for THA by a single surgeon between February 2013 and June 2016 was performed. There were 100 Trident cups (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), 105 Restoris PST Acetabular Cups (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and 165 Trinity Acetabular Cups (Corin, Cirincester, UK). Patient records were reviewed for post-operative complications, clinical outcomes scores and radiographic signs of acetabular osseointegration at minimum 1-year follow-up. Results. Despite differences in fixation surface, there was no difference in Harris Hip Scores at minimum 1-year follow-up and all three cohorts had 100% 1-year survivorship free of revision for failure of acetabular fixation. No cup showed signs of acetabular migration or loosening. Overall reoperation rates were low, ranging from 2.4%-3.8% (p=0.81). Femoral fractures and fixation problems were the most common cause of reoperation, occurring in nearly 2% of cases (n=7), but did not differ between groups. Reoperation for infection occurred in less than 1% of cases (n=3) and did not differ between groups. Revision for recurrent dislocation occurred in 1% of cases (n=4). All occurred with cups lacking dual mobility or constrained options. In all 4 cases the acetabular component was within the Lewinnek “safe zone” and deemed well positioned. In one revision, a lipped liner and longer head were used given concerns about the risk of acetabular component revision due to poor bone stock. In the remaining revisions, the well-positioned cup was revised to allow for the use of constrained or dual mobility implants. Conclusion. All acetabular revisions in our cohort were related to instability or infection, while none were related to acetabular fixation. Subsequent to this experience and analysis, we are wary to select any “new and improved” acetabular cup that does not have an option for a constrained or dual mobility liner, even when enabling technology makes us confident of safe-zone placement. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Acetabular implant position is important for the stability, function, and long-term wear properties of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior studies of acetabular implant positioning have demonstrated a high percentage of outliers, even for experienced hip surgeons, when conventional instruments are used. Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in THA, as it has been shown to improve the precision of acetabular component placement and reduce the incidence of outliers. However, computer navigation with imageless, large-console systems is costly and often interrupts the surgeon's workflow, and thus has not been widely adopted. Another method to improve acetabular component positioning during THA is the use of fluoroscopy with the direct anterior approach. Studies have demonstrated that the supine position of the patient during surgery facilitates the use of fluoroscopic guidance, thus improving acetabular component position. A handheld, accelerometer based navigation unit for use in total hip replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in positioning the acetabular component during anterior approach THA, potentially reducing the need for intra-operative fluoroscopic studies. We sought to compare the radiographic results of direct anterior THA performed with conventional instrumentation vs. handheld navigation to determine the accuracy of the navigation unit, and to see whether or not there was a reduction in the fluoroscopic time used during surgery. Furthermore, we timed the use of the navigation unit to see whether or not it required a substantial addition to surgical time. Our results demonstrate that a handheld navigation unit used during anterior approach THA had no difference with regard to acetabular cup positioning when compared to fluoroscopically assisted THA, but led to a reduction in the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy time

The anterolateral MIS-THA approach can be divided into the Modified Watson-Jones approach (MWJ) performed in the lateral position and the Anterolateral Supine method (ALS) performed in the supine position. Femoral preparation is flexible in stem selection in the MWJ method. On the other hand, the ALS method is more stable for placement on the acetabular implant. Now we introduce novel anterolateral MIS approach named AL60, it makes use of the merits of both MWJ and ALS methods. Technique. The patient is fixed at 30 degrees on the dorsal side from lateral position. That is 60 degrees on the half side from the horizontal plane, and the platform of the operating table is removed just as in the MWJ method. During surgery, the pelvis is fixed by the posterior support, and the stability of the pelvis is very good. Also, if the inclination is accurate at 30 degrees, by holding the holder parallel to the operating table when inserting the cup, the cup is theoretically inserted at Anatomical anteversion 30 degrees. The intraoperative field of view is also visible to the assistant due to the semi-lateral position. Femoral preparation is easier than the MWJ method because the affected limbs have fallen to the dorsal side already. Discussion. Since March 2017 to the end of August 2018, the AL60 method was used for 207 primary THA. There were no dislocations or fractures and any other complications. Full weight bearing was possible from the next day. The AL60 method has stability of the ALS method for acetabular preparation and the operability of the MWJ method for femoral preparation. Therefore, it can be said that new AL60 approach method makes use of the merits of both MWJ and ALS methods

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful and commonly performed surgical interventions worldwide. Based on registry data, at one-year post THA, implant survivorship is nearly 100% and patient satisfaction is 90%. A novel, porous coated acetabular implant was introduced in Europe and Australia in 2007. Several years after its introduction, warnings were issued for the system when used with metal-on-metal bearings due to adverse local tissue reaction, with one study reporting a 24% failure rate (Dramis et al. 2014). A subsequent 2018 study by Teoh et al. showed that the acetabular system had a survival rate of 98.9% at five years when used with conventional polyethylene or ceramic bearing surfaces. The current study was conducted to determine the safety and effectiveness of the acetabular system using standard highly-crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) and ceramic liners at five-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that the acetabular system would exhibit survivorship comparable to other acetabular components on the market at five-year follow-up. A prospective, non-randomized study was conducted from February 2009 to June 2017 at eight sites in Canada and the USA. One hundred fifty-five hips were enrolled and 148 hips analyzed after THA indicated for degenerative arthritis. At five-year follow-up, 103 subjects remained for final analysis. All patients received a zero, three, or multi-hole R3 acetabular shell with Stiktite porous coating (Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA). Standard THA surgical techniques were employed, with surgical approach and either of a XLPE or ceramic bearing surface chosen at the discretion of the surgeon. The primary outcome was revision at five-years post-op with secondary outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), radiographic analysis, and post-operative adverse events. Data and outcomes were analyzed using summary statistics with 95% confidence intervals, t-tests, and Wilcoxon Rank tests. At five-year follow-up the overall success rate was 97.14% (95% CI: 91.88–100). When analyzed by liner type, the success rate was 96.81% (95% CI: 90.96–99.34) for polyethylene (n=94) and 100% (95% CI: 71.51–100) for ceramic (n=11), with no significant difference between either liner type (p=1). There were three revisions during the study (1.9%), two for femoral stem revision post fracture, and one for deep infection. The HHS (51.36 pre-op, 94.50 five-year), all 5 HOOS sub-scales, and WOMAC (40.9 pre-op, 89.13 five-year) scores all significantly improved (p < 0 .001) over baseline scores at all follow-up points. One (0.7%) subject met the criteria for radiographic failure at one-year post-op but did not require revision. Six (1.8%) of the reported adverse events were considered related to the study device, including four cases of squeaking, one bursitis, and one femur fracture. Results from this five-year, multicenter, prospective study indicate good survivorship for this novel, porous coated acetabular system. The overall survivorship of 97.14% at five-year follow-up is comparable to that reported for similar acetabular components and aligns with previous analyses (Teoh et al. 2018)

Introduction. Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty helps acetabular preparation and implantation with the assistance of a robotic arm. A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system is also helpful for acetabular preparation and implantation, however, there is no report to compare these methods. The purpose of this study is to compare the acetabular cup position between the assistance of the robotic arm and the CT-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Methods. We studied 31 hips of 28 patients who underwent the robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty (MAKO group) between August 2018 and March 2019 and 119 hips of 112 patients who received THA under CT-based navigation (CT-navi group) between September 2015 and November 2018. The preoperative diagnosis of all patients was osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. They received the same cementless cup (Trident, Stryker). Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty were performed by four surgeons while THA under CT-based navigation were performed by single senior surgeon. Target angle was 40 degree of radiological cup inclination (RI) and 15 degree of radiological cup anteversion (RA) in all patients. Propensity score matching was used to match the patients by gender, age, weight, height, BMI, and surgical approach in the two groups and 30 patients in each group were included in this study. Postoperative cup position was assessed using postoperative anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph by the Lewinnek's methods. The differences between target and postoperative cup position were investigated. Results. The acetabular cup position of all cases in both Mako and CT-navi group within Lewinnek's safe zone (RI: 40±10 degree; RA: 15±10 degree) in group were within this zone. Three was no significant difference of RI between Mako and CT-navi group (40.0 ± 2.1 degree vs 39.7± 3.6 degree). RA was 15.0 ± 1.2 degree and 17.0 ± 1.9 degree in MAKO group and in CT-navi group, respectively, with significant difference (p<0.001). The differences of RA between target and postoperative angle were smaller in MAKO group than CT-navi group (0.60± 1.05 degree vs 2.34± 1.40 degree, p<0.001). The difference or RI in MAKO group was smaller than in CT-navi, however, there was no significance between them (1.67± 1.27 degree vs 2.39± 2.68 degree, p=0.197). Conclusions. Both the assistance of the robotic arm and the CT-based navigation system were helpful to achieve the acetabular cup implantation, however, MAKO system achieved more accurate acetabular cup implantation than CT-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty for the patients with OA secondary to DDH. Longer follow-up is necessary to investigate the clinical outcome

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a physically demanding procedure where the surgeon is subject to fatigue with increased energy expenditure comparable to exercise[1]. Robotic technologies have been introduced into operating rooms to assist surgeons with ergonomically challenging tasks and to reduce overall physical stress and fatigue[2]. Greater exposure to robotic assisted training may create efficiencies that may reduce energy expenditure[3]. The purpose of this study was to assess surgeon energy expenditure during THA and perceived mental and physical demand. Methods. 12 THAs (6 cadavers) randomized by BMI were performed by two surgeons with different robotic assisted experience. Surgeon 1 (S1) had performed over 20 robotic assisted THAs on live patients and Surgeon 2 (S2) had training on 1 cadaver with no patient experience. For each cadaver, laterality was randomized and manual total hip arthroplasty (MTHA) was performed first on one hip and robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) on the contralateral hip. A biometric shirt collected surgeon data on caloric energy expenditure (CEE) throughout acetabular reaming (AR) and acetabular implantation (AI) for each THA procedure. Surgeon mental and physical demand was assessed after each surgery. Scores were reported from 1–10, with 10 indicating high demand. A paired sample t-test was performed between MTHA and RATHA within each surgeon group with a confidence interval of (α =0.05). Results. Each surgeon demonstrated greater CEE during MTHA, Figure 1. Surgeon CEE during MTHA was greater for S1(100±28.1 cals) compared to RATHA(83.5±0.34 cals), with no significant difference (p>0.05, p=0.49). Energy expenditure was greater for S2 during MTHA(83.5±16.3 cals) compared to RATHA(75.3±0.71 cals) with no significance (p>0.05, p=0.68). RATHA resulted in a decrease in average CEE for each surgeon with a reduction of 16.5% for S1 and 9.8 % for S2. Surgeon task time during MTHA was greater for S1(14.7±3.2 mins) compared to RATHA(12.3±4.93 mins), with no significance (p>0.05, p=0.46). Average task time was greater for S2 during MTHA(10.0±2.65 mins) compared to RATHA(8.7±2.89 mins) with no significant differences (p>0.05, p=0.66). Average mental and physical demand was less for RATHA compared to MTHA, Figure 2. Average physical demand reported during AR for MTHA(5.5±1.2) was greater than RATHA(4.3±2.0, p=0.08). Average physical demand was greater for AI for MTHA(6±1.3) than RATHA(3.7±2.1, p=0.29). Average mental demand was significantly greater during AR for MTHA(5.7±1.03) when compared to RATHA(3.2±1.5, p=0.007). Average mental demand was greater during AI for MTHA(6.2±1.2) than RATHA(2.3±1.5, p=0.051). Conclusion. Regardless of prior surgical experience, both surgeons had reduced caloric expenditure when performing RATHA as compared to MTHA. For the surgeon with more RATHA experience, there was a greater percent reduction in caloric expenditure between surgical interventions. Both surgeons had similar percent reductions in time for RATHA compared to MTHA. Each surgeon noted increased mental and physical demand during MTHA. The trends suggest RATHA may reduce surgeon energy expenditure and time to perform acetabular reaming and implant insertion for THA. The pilot data suggests that there may be a relationship between energy expenditure and surgeon experience. This could be explored in future studies with a larger surgeon population. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Uncemented porous coated acetabular components have gained more research emphasis in recent years compared to their cemented counterparts, largely owing to the natural biological fixation they offer. Nevertheless, sufficient peri-prosthetic bone ingrowth is essential for long-term fixation of such uncemented acetabular components. The phenomenon of bone ingrowth can be predicted based on mechanoregulatory principles of primary bone fracture healing. Literature review reveals that the surface texture of implant plays a major role in implant-bone fixation mechanism. A few insilico models based on 2-D microscale finite elements (FE) were reported in literatures to predict the influence of surface texture designs on peri-prosthetic bone ingrowth. However, most of these studies were based on FE models of dental implants. The primary objective of this study, therefore, is to mechanobiologically predict the influence of surface texture on bone- ingrowth in acetabular components considering a novel 3-D mesh-shaped surface texture on the implant. Materials/Methods. The 3-D microscale model [Fig.1] of implant-bone interface was developed using CATIA. ®. V5R20 software (DassaultSystèmes, France) and was modelled in ANSYS V15.0 FE software (Ansys Inc., PA, USA) using coupled linear elastic ten-noded tetrahedral finite elements. The model consists of cast-inbeaded mesh textured implant having finely meshed inter-bead spacing. Linear, elastic and isotropic material properties considering Young's modulus of 210 GPa and Poisson's ratio of 0.3 for stainless steel implant were employed in the model. Boundary of bone was assumed to be rich in Mesenchymal Stem Cells(MSC) with periodic boundary conditions at contralateral surfaces. The linear elastic material properties in the model were updated iteratively through a tissue differentiation algorithm that works on the principle of mechanotransduction driven by local mechanical stimuli, e.g. hydrostatic pressure and equivalent deviatoric strain. Results. Results indicate that bone ingrowth is inhibited upon increasing the inter-bead spacing and upon decreasing the bead aspect ratio. It has been observed that there is a predominant influence of bead spacing diameter on the peri-acetabular bone ingrowth. The increase in bead spacing diameter has led to increased bead height that is found to promote higher bone ingrowth with an increase in average Young's modulus of neo-tissue layer. Conclusions. The present study focussed on the development of a new texture on the implant surface and to study the influence of surface texture on bone-ingrowth in acetabular components. Since there is a promising increase in average Young's modulus of the newly formed tissue layer, it predicts the increase in stiffness of the newly formed tissue. The increase in tissue stiffness reveals that, there is not much inhibition in bone ingrowth after the employment of the acetabular implant. The numerical study based on mechanoregulatory algorithm considering the appropriate mechanical stimuli responsible for bone ingrowth, reveals that, compared to hemispherical beaded surface texture, mesh shaped surface texture provides an improved fixation of the acetabular component. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Recently, new metallurgical techniques allowed the creation of 3D metal matrices for cementless acetabular components. Among several different products now available on the market, the Biofoam Dynasty cup (MicroPort Orthopedics® Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) uses an ultraporous Titanium technology but has never been assessed in literature. Coping with this lack of information, our study aims to assess its radiological osteointegration at two years in a primary total hip arthroplasty and compares it to a successful contemporary cementless acetabular cup. This monocentric retrospective study includes 96 Dynasty Biofoam acetabular components implanted between March 2010 and August 2014 with a minimum 2 years radiographic follow-up. Previous acetabular surgery, any septic issue or re-operation for component malposition were exclusion criteria. They were compared to 96 THA using the Trident PSL matched for age, gender, BMI and follow-up. Presence of radiolucencies and sclerotic lines were described on AP pelvis views using the classification of DeLee and Charnley. There was no statistical difference between the two groups concerning demographics and mean follow-up (p> 0.05). Shell's anteversion was similar but inclination was greater in the biofoam group (p=0.006). 27,17% of the Biofoam shells presented radiolucencies in 2 zones or more and 0% of the Trident shells. 11,96% of Biofoam cups showed radiolucencies in the 3 zones of DeLee comparing to 0% of the Trident cups. There was no statistical difference between the Biofoam group (n=54/96) and the Trident PSL group (n=57/96) in pre-operative functional scores for both WOMAC subscales and SF-12. When evaluating last follow-up PROM's, no significant differences were found comparing the entirety of both groups, 56 Biofoam and 51 Trident PSL. No difference was found either when comparing Biofoam patients with ³ 2 zones of radiolucencies (n=15) to the whole Trident group (n=51). This study raises concerns about radiologic evidence of osteointegration of the Biofoam acetabular cup. Nevertheless, these radiological findings do not find any clinical correlation considering clinical scores. Thus, it may question the real meaning of these high-rated radiolucencies, which at first sight reflect a poorer osteointegration. The first possible limitation with this study is an overinterpretation of the radiographs. Nevertheless, both observers were blinded regarding the patients groups and clinical outcomes and there was a strong inter-observer reliability. Although both cohorts were matched on their demographics and were similar on the cup anteversion, we noticed a slightly lower abduction angle in the Biofoam population. It could reduce the bone-implant coverage area and hence hinders the bony integration, but this difference was small and both groups remained in the Lewinneck security zone. Furthermore, even if patients were matched on age, gender, BMI and follow-up, other variables can influence early osteointegration (smoke status, osteoporosis) and have not been controlled even though we have no reasons to think their distribution could differ in the 2 groups. The real clinical meaning of these findings remains unknown but serious concerns are raised about the radiographic osteointegration of the Dynasty Biofoam acetabular components. Concerns are all the more lawful that this implants aim to enhance osteointegration

Introduction. Previous research defines the existence of a “safe zone” (SZ) pertaining to acetabular cup implantation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is believed that if the cup is implanted at 40°±10° inclination and 15°±10° anteversion, risk of dislocation is reduced. However, recent studies have documented that even when the acetabular cup is placed within the SZ, high incidence dislocation and instability remains due to the combination of patient-specific configuration, cup diameter, head size, and surgical approach. The SZ only investigates the angular orientation of the cup, ignoring translational location. Translational location of the cup can cause a mismatch between anatomical hip center and implanted cup center, which has not been widely explored. Objective. The objective of this study is to define a zone within which the implanted joint center can be altered with respect to the anatomical joint center but will not increase the likelihood of post-operative hip separation or dislocation. Methods. A theoretical forward solution hip model, previously validated by telemetric devices and fluoroscopy data of existing implants, was used for analysis. The model allows for modifications of implant geometries/placement and soft tissue resection to simulate various surgical conditions. For the baseline simulation, the cup center was matched to the anatomical hip joint center, calculated as the center of the best fit sphere mapping the acetabulum, and the orientation of the cup was 40°/15° (inclination/anteversion). Keeping cup orientation the same, the location of the cup was moved in 1 mm increments in all directions to identify the region where a mismatch between the two centers did not lead to separation or instability in the joint. Results. During both swing and stance phase, when the acetabular cup was placed within the optimal conic with a slant height of 5±1 mm, no hip instability or dislocation risk occurred. As the acetabular cup was translated to the boundary of the optimal conic, hip instability increased. When the acetabular cup was placed at the boundary of the optimal conic, up to 2 mm of hip separation in the lateral direction occurred during swing phase, resulting in a decrease in contact area and an increase in contact stress. As the cup was placed outside the optimal conic, severe edge loading and hip separation up to 3.5 mm occurred during swing phase. In general, this resulted in large increases in cup stress, resulting in increased risk of wear leading to early complications. Discussion. This study introduces the concept of an optimal conic in the hip joint space to reduce the incidence of dislocation and hip instability after THA. Placing the cup center within the optimal conic reduces hip instability. Moving the cup further from the anatomical hip center increases the occurrence of hip instability. Cup placement within the optimal conic and angular SZ can lead to better postoperative outcomes. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly