Worldwide, it is expected that 6.3 million patients will sustain a hip fracture in 2050. Hemiarthroplasty is commonly practiced for displaced femoral neck fractures. The choice between unipolar (UH) or bipolar (BH) hemiarthroplasty is still controversial. The objective of this study was to assess the effect on hip function of BH compared to UH for a displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing BH to UH. Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. All data was pooled in Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 software. Selection of the studies included, data abstraction, data synthesis, risk of biais and quality of evidence evaluation was done independently by two authors. Our primary outcome was postoperative hip function. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), acetabular erosion and postoperative complications. 13 randomized controlled trials (n=2256) were eligible for the meta-analysis. There was no difference in hip function scores (standardized mean difference of 0.33 [−0.09–0.75, n=864, I. 2. = 87%,]). Patients with bipolar heads had higher Health-Related Quality of Life scores than patients with unipolar heads (mean difference in EQ-5D scores of 0.12 [0.04–0.19, n=550, I. 2. = 44%]). The use of BH decreased the incidence of acetabular erosion (relative risk of 0.37 [0.17–0.83, n=525, I. 2. = 0%]). There was no relative risk difference for mortality, dislocation, revision and infection. Due to the high heterogeneity between the studies included, it is still unclear whether patients undergoing BH have better hip function than patients undergoing UH. Although, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may be improved. Future research could be conducted to determine whether a BH offers a better quality of life than UH to geriatric patients undergoing surgery. More precise assessment scores could be developed to better evaluate postoperative outcomes

The use of endoprosthesis implants is frequent for tumours involving the proximal third of the femur and not amenable to primary arthroplasty or internal fixation. In this population, these implants are preferentially cemented given poor bone quality associated with systemic diseases and treatments. Loosening is a common complication of these implants that have been linked to poor bone quality, type of implants and importantly cementing technique. Thus, these techniques vary between different surgeons and based mainly on previous experience. One of the most successful cementing techniques in the arthroplasty literature is the French paradox. This technique involves removing the cancellous bone of the proximal femoral metaphysis and selects the largest stem to tightly fit the created cavity delineated by cortical bone. Cementing the implant results in a very thin cement layer that fills the inconsistent gaps between the metal and the bone. To our knowledge, no previous report exists in the literature assessing loosening in proximal femur replacement using the French paradox cementing technique. In this study, we sought to examine (1) rates of loosening in proximal femur replacement, and (2) the oncological outcomes including tumour recurrence and implant related complications. A retrospective study of 42 patients underwent proximal femur replacement between 1990 and 2018 at our institution. Of these, 30 patients met our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers have evaluated the preoperative and the most recent postoperative radiographs using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) radiographic scoring system and Gruen classification for femoral stem loosening. Additionally, the acetabulum was evaluated for erosion according to the criteria of Baker et al. The mean age of this cohort was 60.5 (19–80), with 60% being males. The primary origin was metastatic in 17 (56.7%) patients, bone sarcoma in 10 (33.3%) patients and soft tissue sarcoma in 3 (10%) patients. Pathological fractures were present in 11 (36.7%) patients. Seven (23.3%) patients had prior intramedullary nailing. Preoperative radiotherapy was used in 8 (26.7%) and postoperative radiotherapy in 17 (56.7%) patients. The mean clinical follow-up was 25.2±26.3 months and the mean radiographical follow-up was 24.8±26 months. The mean ISOLS score for both reviewers was found to be 89±6.5% and 86.5±6.1%, respectively. Additionally, the first reviewer found two patients to be possibly loos (6.7%) compared to one (3.3%) patient for the second reviewer. No components scored as probably or definitely loose and non-required revision for either loosening or metal failure. Furthermore, both reviewers showed no acetabular erosion in 25 (83.3%) and 24 (80%) patients, respectively. On the other hand, the overall rate of complications was 36.6% with 11 complications reported in 30 patients. Local recurrence occurred in five (16.6%) patients. Prosthetic Dislocation was the most frequent complications with eight dislocations in four patients. Despite complications, our results showed no radiographic evidence of stem loosening. Cementing proximal femur prosthesis with a tight canal fit and with a thin cement mantle appears to be a viable option at short and medium term

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most common surgery performed for complications of bipolar arthroplasty. The present study evaluated the functional results and complications associated with this surgery. Patients and Methods. Forty eight hips (48 patients) who had conversion of bipolar arthroplasty to THA between 1998 June and 2013 June, and who were followed-up for more than one year were evaluated. Twenty one hips had conversion surgery to THA using a Fitmore cup with metal-on-metal articulation (28 mm head). Six hips had surgery using the SecurFit cup and three hips, using the Lima LTO cup with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation (28 mm or 32 mm head). Eighteen hips had surgery using a large head metal-on-metal bearing: –MMC (seven hips), ACCIS (six hips) and Magnum (five hips). The average time of follow-up duration was 3.9 years (range, 1.0–11.3). There were 22 men and 26 women between the ages of 28 and 80 years (average, 68.9 years) at the time of conversion surgery. Conversion arthroplasty was performed for acetabular erosion without femoral stem loosening in 19 hips, acetabular cartilage erosion with femoral stem loosening in 13 hips, periprosthetic fracture in 12 hips, and recurrent dislocation in four hips. Results were evaluated using Harris hip score (HHS) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. The radiographs were analyzed for evidence of acetabular and femoral osteolysis or loosening. The complications were evaluated. Results. The time interval between hemiarthroplasty and conversion total hip prosthesis was 6.7 years on average (range, 5 months to 12 years). Pain was the leading sign in all patients. Average HHS improved from 42 preoperatively (range, 34–67) to 86 (range, 65 – 97) postoperatively. The average total WOMAC score improved from 47 (range, 32–67) to 22 (range, 9–44) postoperatively. All the patients operated for groin pain reported significant improvement in their symptoms. Radiological evaluation showed good bony ingrowth and stability of all the femoral components. None of the acetabular component showed migration, loosening, wear, or osteolysis at last follow-up. Complications occurred in five hips. One dislocation and one recurrent dislocation were encountered in isolated acetabular revision hips; whereas one single dislocation, one recurrent dislocation, and one trochanteric nonunion occurred in the hips with revision of both components. All dislocations were occurred in hips with a femoral head size of 28 mm. Dislocations were managed by closed reduction, and none of the patients required revision for dislocation. Conclusions. Conversion THA after symptomatic bipolar arthroplasty can offer reliable pain relief and functional improvement. The perioperative complications approximate those of revision THAs

Uncemented metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties (THAs) have had a modular cobalt-chrome alloy head since their introduction in the early 1980's. Retrieval analysis studies and case reports in the early 1990's first reported corrosion between the femoral stem trunnion (usually titanium alloy) and cobalt-chrome alloy femoral head. However, then this condition seemed to disappear for about two decades? There are now numerous recent case series of this problem after metal-on-polyethylene THA, with a single taper or dual taper modular femoral component. Metal ion elevation, corrosion debris, and effusion are caused by mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC). These patients present with diffuse hip pain, simulating trochanteric bursitis, iliopsoas tendinitis, or even deep infection. Trunnion corrosion, with adverse local tissue reaction, is a diagnosis of exclusion, after infection, loosening, or fracture. The initial lab tests recommended are: ESR, CRP, and serum cobalt and chromium ions. With a metal-on-polyethylene THA, a cobalt level > 1ppb is abnormal. Plain radiographs are usually negative, but may show calcar osteolysis or acetabular erosion or cyst. MARS MRI may be the best imaging study to confirm the diagnosis. Hip aspiration for culture and cell-count may be necessary. The operative treatment is empiric, with debridement, and head exchange with a ceramic head-titanium sleeve (or oxidised zirconium head) placed on the cleaned trunnion. The femoral component may have to be removed if there is “whole trunnion failure”. This usually relieves the symptoms, but the complication rate of this procedure may be high

Purpose. To observe the follow-up results of standard cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with double loop and tension band wiring technique for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Materials and Methods. From May 2000 to May 2006, 86 cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties were performed in elderly patients who had unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The mean age at the time of surgery was 82 years old. The average follow-up period were 5.3 years. We evaluated post-operative results after operation by clinical and radiographic methods. Results. Clinically, the final follow-up of Harrsi hip score was noted 79.2. The mean time needed for full weight bearing following surgery was 4.2 weeks and 82.5% of patients regained their preoperative ambulatory level. All patients achieved union in lesser trochanter fracuture, but great trochanter displacement were observed in 4 cases. There was one case of acetabular erosion. Post-operative superficial infections were found in 2 cases. 1 case with stem subsidence(<5 mm) showed satisfactory results without further subsidence in follow-ups. Conclusion. If we properly apply indications in technique with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture in elderly, we will achieve systematic postoperative rehabilitation, pain control and handy nursing which is its one of merits

Background. BHA is popular surgery for femoral neck fractures expecially elderly patients. However, clinical results are variable that factors affecting results are questionable. Therefore we investigated radiologic fators, dysplastic hip whether influences results of BHA. Methods. Between 2004 and 2009, 200 patients undergoing bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture were divided two groups; a lateral center edge (LCE) angle of < 16 degree or > 16 degree on anteroposterior radiographs. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Dermogrpahic data, the harris hip score, WOMAC index, Koval activity level, and complication were recorded. The minimum follow up interval was 4 years (mean, 7.8 years). Result. Late postoperative complications such as periprosthetic joint infection, acetabular erosion, and subluxation of bioplar head were commonly observed in a group <16 degree of center edge angle. Clinical score was significantly lower in dysplastic group. Revision rate was higher in dysplastic group compared with group LCE angle of above the 16 degree. Conclusion. These results suggest that the dysplastic nature might be affected result of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femroal neck fracture especially elderly patients

Purpose. To evaluate outcome after cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasties using a standard(tapered, rectangular) stem for the treatment of above type A2 fractures in elderly patients. Material and methods. We reviewed the records of 37 patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty between February 2006 and Feburuary 2010 in our hospital who were followed for more than two years after surgery. The mean patient age was 73.5 years old (range 64∼88 years old). 16 patients were men, and 21 patients were women. We evaluated the results by analyzing operation time, amount of bleeding, recovery of walking ability, complications and radiologic findings. Result. The mean operation time was 75.3 minutes. The average total amount of bleeding was of 755.5 cc. At the last follow-up, 23 patients (62%) had recovered walking ability. Complications included a deep infection in one case, 1 cases of acetabular erosion, 2 cases of greater trochanter non-union. There were no revisions due to prosthesis loosening or another reason. Conclusion. Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a tapered, rectangular stem can be an alternative treatment for type A2 intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients so as to achieve earlier mobilisation

Long-term prospective RCT comparing hemiarthroplasty (HEMI) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of intracapsular neck of femur fracture. 81 previously mobile, independent, orientated patients were randomised to receive THA or HEMI after sustaining a displaced neck of femur fracture. Patients were followed up with radiographs, Oxford hip score (OHS), SF-36 scores and their walking distance. At a mean follow up of 8.7 years, overall mortality following THA was 32.5% compared to 51.2% following HEMI (p=0.09). Following THA, patients died after a mean of 63.6 months compared to 45 months following HEMI (p=0.093). Patients with THA walked further and had better physical function. No HEMIs dislocated but three (7.5%) THAs did. Four (9.8%) HEMI patients were revised to THA, but only one (2.5%) THA required revision. All surviving HEMI patients had acetabular erosion and all surviving THA patients had wear of the cemented polyethylene cup. Patients with THA have better function in the medium-term and survive longer

Purpose. To analyze the effectiveness of a vancomycin impregnated calcium sulfate cement bead insertion after debridement (of) an acute-immediate stage infected hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. Between 2002 and 2008, 13 patients with documented acute-immediate stage infection of hip arthroplasty were reviewed and followed for at least two years postoperatively(average 4.3 years). The preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiologic findings and blood laboratory work were checked. All cases were performed through retention of the implant and massive debridement and saline irrigation. After that a vancomycin impregnated calcium sulfate cement beads was inserted. Results. After the first operation, the average interval for second operation was 27.7 days (17–37). At the second operation, the erythrocyte sediment rate and C-reactive protein were 150.97 mm/hr (34.6 ∼339.7 mm/hr) and 76.4 mg/L (41∼132 mg/L) respectively. Infectious organism were cultured and isolated. There were 5 cases of Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In addition, results of an antibiotics sensitivity test were 8 cases of Vancomycin, and 5 cases of 3rd generation Cephalosporin. Radiologic results showed 10 cases with stable fixation on last follow-up (femoral stem) and 1 case of hip joint space narrowing, acetabular erosion. Conclusion. Vancomycin impregnated, calcium sulfate, cement bead insertion for an acute immediate infection of hip arthroplasty proved to be a useful method

The cement in cement technique for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has shown good results in selected cases. However, results of its use in the revision of hemiarthroplasty to THA has not been previously reported. Between May 1994 and May 2007 28 (20 Thompson's and 8 Exeter bipolar) hip hemiarthroplasties were revised to THA in 28 patients using the cement in cement technique. All had an Exeter stem inserted at the time of revision. Clinical and operative data were collected prospectively. Clinical evaluation was by the Charnley, Harris and Oxford. Hip scores and radiographs were analysed post-operatively and at latest follow up. The mean age at time of hemiarthroplasty revision was 80 (35 to 93) years. The reason for revision was acetabular erosion in 12 (43%), recurrent dislocation in eight (29%), aseptic stem loosening in four (14%), periprosthetic fracture in two (7%) and infection in a further two (7%) patients. No patient has been lost to follow up. Three patients died within three months of surgery. The mean follow up of the remainder was 50 (16 to 119) months. Survivorship with revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100%. Three cases (11%) have since undergone further revision, one for recurrent dislocation, one for infection, and one for periprosthetic fracture. The cement in cement technique can be successfully applied to revision of hip hemiarthroplasty to THA. It has a number of advantages in this elderly population including minimising bone loss, blood loss and operative time

Objective. To evaluate the volume of cases, causes of failure, complications in patients with a failed Thompson hemiarthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective review was undertaken between 2005–11, of all Thompson implant revised in the trust. Patients were identified by clinical coding. All case notes were reviewed. Data collection included patients demographic, time to revision, reason for revision, type of revision implant, surgical time and technique, transfusion, complications, HDU stay, mobility pre and post revision,. Results. 23 patients were identified, age 81 years (range 76–90). male to female ratio was 2:21, 11 right and 12 left hip. Mean time to failure was 50 months (1–104 m) range, mean follow up post revision surgery 26 months (3–77). Reason for revision was dislocation in 3 patients (13%), femoral loosening 5 (21%), peri-prosthetic fracture 3 (13%), Infection 6 (26%) and acetabular erosion 6 (26%). There were six infected cases in the study which was all aspirated preoperatively off which only 4 were positive. All infected cases grew an organism from intra-operative specimens. (80% cases) were coagulase negative Staphylococcus aureus. 35% only positive on enrichment cultures. 4 infected Thompsons were revised successfully with 2 stage revisions. One patient died after 1. st. stage and another was able to mobilise after the first stage with a cement spacer and refused further surgery. Mean surgical time was 3.5 hours (range 2.5–5.5). HDU stay 1.3 days (range 0–6). 6 deaths in total, 3 unrelated, 3 post operative. Complications included 1 fracture requiring revision, 1 dislocation, 1 foot drop and 4 chest infection of which two patients died from this. Conclusion. We identified a revision rate of 1.2%, complication occurred in 43% of cases with a one year mortality of 26%. Failed Thompson revision surgery is rare, challenging and patient selection is important to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality

In 1823 J. White excised the head. In 1887 a German surgeon replaced the head with ivory. Interposition arthroplasties were common after WW1. Short-stemmed head replacing prosthesis were developed after WW2. Moores and Thompson designed a more stable intramedullary stem. Acetabular erosion was troublesome—and so replacing both surfaces started in the late 1950s using Teflon cup and metal femur. Unfortunately, these quickly became loose due to wear or sepsis. In 1960, Charnley used a polyethylene cup and stainless-steel femur and fixed both with dental cement. This ‘low friction arthroplast’ became a routine procedure after 1961. In the 1970s there were many ‘Charnley look-alike’ prosthesis with similar problems of poly-wear, granulomas and cysts causing bone loss, loosening, breakages and infection. Resurfacing with two thin shells was developed to reduce the foreign material, the bone resection and the cement used. Unfortunately, neck fractures, avascular necrosis and excessive wear of the poly shell were common. Despite operating theatres with laminar flow of sterile air, space suits and improved cementing techniques, the same problems occurred. To avoid poly and cement, Mittelmayer developed a ceramic screw cup, which did not require cement. Although some screws migrated, they did not wear. Because the un-cemented metal stem remained fixed solid to the femur, un-cemented metal cups and stems were developed. To avoid the poly-wear, ceramic liners became popular. To provide the active patients with a stable joint that requires no restriction in physical activity, a large head in a large cup is desirable. Unfortunately, the large metal-on-metal resurfacing prosthesis produce metal wear ions and nanoparticles which can form hypersensitivities, cysts and pseudotumours. Computer assisted navigation to ensure correct positioning of the prosthetic components is obviously useful for surgeons that use incisions too small to see enough to be certain of the cups position. Presently, articular cartilage research is progressing rapidly and by 2020 most arthritic hip joints will be arthroscopically debrided and resurfaced by an injection of genetically engineered articular cartilage stem cells

INTRODUCTION. The number of patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery is rising and thus the number of periprosthetic fractures is set to increase. The risk factors for periprosthetic fractures include osteolysis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis and use of certain types of implants. Evidence from literature suggests that the mortality rate within one year is similar to that following treatment for hip fractures thus as surgeons it is important for us to understand the various management strategies of these fractures. MANAGEMENT. Acetabular periprosthetic fractures are uncommon and classified into Type I, in which the acetabular component is radiographically stable and Type II, in which the acetabular component is unstable. It is better to prevent than to treat these fractures. Femoral periprosthetic fractures have several classifications the most commonly used is the Vancouver classification (fig 1). Type-A fractures are proximal and can involve the greater or lesser trochanter. These are often related to osteolytic wear debris and therefore revision of the bearing surface with bone grafting is recommended. AG involves the greater trochanter and A. L. involves the lesser, and these can usually be stabilised by cerclage wires supplemented by screws or plates if required (fig 2). Management of type B fractures is more controversial and will be discussed in depth with reference to all recent papers at the meeting and data from the Swedish Joint Registry. In summary the management is shown in fig 3. In type-C fractures, one should ensure the fixation device bypasses the femoral stem by at least 2 diaphyseal diameters. Management is as shown in fig 4. DISCUSSION. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures is rising and effective management involves a multi-disciplinary approach, and begins with taking a careful history to identify co-morbidities, pre-fracture mobility, and pre-fracture symptoms of loosening or acetabular erosion. Use of NSAIDs and smoking status should be noted. Examination findings should focus on mental status, any signs of infection, neurovascular status and the integrity of the soft tissue envelope. Clear radiographs are required to effectively comment on bone quality and the identification of any pathological lesions. White cell count, CRP and ESR should help confirm the absence of infection and if any doubt exists, a pre-operative aspiration should be considered. Ideally surgery should be performed within 2 days of fracture by a revision arthroplasty surgeon, followed by monitoring on a high dependency unit. With regard to the formulation of an operative strategy, certainly there is no substitute for careful assessment of remaining bone stock, diameter of the canal, fracture configuration and patient-related factors. There is a paucity of data in the current literature relating to the management of acetabular fractures. Displaced femoral fractures are managed with cerclage fixation along with bone grafting of any osteolytic lesions and revision of the bearing surfaces. Regarding femoral periprosthetic fractures it would appear that one should err on the side of long stem revision arthroplasty +/− impaction allografting should any doubt exist around loosening of the implant since this reduces the one-year mortality rate and the risk of failure