Aims. There are limited long-term studies reporting on outcomes of the Zimmer Modular Revision (ZMR) stem, and concerns remain regarding failure. Our primary aim was to determine long-term survival free from all-cause revision and stem-related failure for this modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary aims included evaluating radiological and functional outcomes. Methods. We retrospectively identified all patients in our institutional database who underwent revision THA using the ZMR system from January 2000 to December 2007. We included 106 patients (108 hips) with a mean follow-up of 14.5 years (2.3 to 22.3). Mean patient age was 69.2 years (37.0 to 89.4), and 51.9% were female (n = 55). Indications for index revision included aseptic loosening (73.1%), infection (16.7%), fracture (9.3%), and stem fracture (0.9%). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the all-cause and stem-related failure revision-free survival. At most recent follow-up, Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were collected, and radiological stem stability was determined using the Engh classification. Results. A total of 17 hips (15.7%) underwent re-revision of any component. Indications for re-revision were stem failure (35.3%; n = 6), infection (29.4%; n = 5), instability (29.4%; n = 5), and acetabular aseptic loosening (5.9%; n = 1). The five- and 15-year all-cause survival was 89.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.7 to 92.7) and 83.3% (95% CI 79.6 to 87.0), respectively. There were six re-revisions (5.6%) for stem failure; five for stem fracture and one for aseptic loosening. The five- and 15-year survival free from stem-related failure was 97.2% (95% CI 95.6 to 98.8) and 94.0% (95% CI 91.6 to 96.4), respectively. At final follow-up, the mean OHS was 36.9 (8.0 to 48.0) and 95.7% (n = 66) of surviving modular revision stems were well-fixed in available radiographs. Conclusion. Femoral revision with the ZMR offers satisfactory long-term all-cause revision-free survival, good survival free of stem-related failure, and favourable clinical outcomes. Stem fracture was the most common reason for stem-related failure and occurred both early and late. This highlights the importance of both early and long-term surveillance for stem-related failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):112–117

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to alleviate pain and restore joint biomechanics to an equivalent degree to age-matched peers. Zimmer Biomet's Nexgen TKA was the most common implant in the UK between 2003 and 2016. This study compared the biomechanical outcomes of the Nexgen implant against a cohort of healthy older adults to determine whether knee biomechanics is restored post-TKA. Patients with a primary Nexgen TKA and healthy adults >55 years old with no musculoskeletal deficits or diagnosis of arthritis were recruited locally. Eligible participants attended one research appointment. Bilateral knee range of motion (RoM) was assessed with a goniometer. A motorised arthrometer (GENOUROB) was then used to quantify the anterior-posterior laxity of each knee. Finally, gait patterns were analysed on a treadmill. An 8-camera Vicon motion capture system generated the biomechanical model. Preliminary statistical analyses were performed in SPSS (α = 0.05; required sample size for ongoing study: n=21 per group). The patient cohort (n=21) was older and had a greater BMI than the comparative group (n=13). Patients also had significantly poorer RoM than healthy older adults. However, there were no inter-group differences in knee laxity, walking speed or cadence. Gait kinematics were comparable in the sagittal plane during stance phase. Peak knee flexion during swing phase was lower in the patient group, however (49.0° vs 41.1°). Preliminary results suggest that knee laxity and some spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of gait are restored in Nexgen TKA patients. While knee RoM remains significantly poorer in the patient cohort, an average RoM of >110° was achieved. This suggests the implant provides sufficient RoM for most activities of daily living. Further improvements to knee kinematics may necessitate additional rehabilitation. Future recruitment drives will concentrate on adults over the age of 70 for improved inter-group comparability

Aims. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and safe orthopaedic procedure. Zimmer Biomet's NexGen is the second most popular brand of implant used in the UK. The primary cause of revision after the first year is aseptic loosening. We present our experience of using this implant, with significant concerns around its performance with regards early aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Methods. A retrospective, single-surgeon review was carried out of all of the NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized (LPS) TKAs performed in this institute. The specific model used for the index procedures was the NexGen Complete Knee System (Legacy Knee-Posterior Stabilized LPS-Flex Articular Surface, LPS-Flex Femoral Component Option, and Stemmed Nonaugmentable Tibial Component Option). Results. Between 2013 and 2016, 352 NexGen TKAs were carried out on 331 patients. A total of 62 TKAs have been revised to date, giving an all-cause revision rate of 17.6% at a minimum of five years. Three of these revisions were due to infection. Overall, 59 of the revisions were performed for aseptic loosening (16.7%) of the tibial component. The tibial component was removed intraoperatively without instrumentation due to significant tibial debonding between the implant-cement interface. Conclusion. While overall, we believe that early aseptic loosening is multi-factorial in nature, the significantly high aseptic revision rate, as seen by an experienced fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon, has led us to believe that there is a fundamental issue with this NexGen implant design. Continued implant surveillance and rigorous review across all regions using this particular implant is warranted based on the concerning findings described here. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):495–501

Aims. Mid-level constraint designs for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are intended to reduce coronal plane laxity. Our aims were to compare kinematics and ligament forces of the Zimmer Biomet Persona posterior-stabilized (PS) and mid-level designs in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes under loads simulating clinical exams of the knee in a cadaver model. Methods. We performed TKA on eight cadaveric knees and loaded them using a robotic manipulator. We tested both PS and mid-level designs under loads simulating clinical exams via applied varus and valgus moments, internal-external (IE) rotation moments, and anteroposterior forces at 0°, 30°, and 90° of flexion. We measured the resulting tibiofemoral angulations and translations. We also quantified the forces carried by the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL/LCL) via serial sectioning of these structures and use of the principle of superposition. Results. Mid-level inserts reduced varus angulations compared to PS inserts by a median of 0.4°, 0.9°, and 1.5° at 0°, 30°, and 90° of flexion, respectively, and reduced valgus angulations by a median of 0.3°, 1.0°, and 1.2° (p ≤ 0.027 for all comparisons). Mid-level inserts reduced net IE rotations by a median of 5.6°, 14.7°, and 17.5° at 0°, 30°, and 90°, respectively (p = 0.012). Mid-level inserts reduced anterior tibial translation only at 90° of flexion by a median of 3.0 millimetres (p = 0.036). With an applied varus moment, the mid-level insert decreased LCL force compared to the PS insert at all three flexion angles that were tested (p ≤ 0.036). In contrast, with a valgus moment the mid-level insert did not reduce MCL force. With an applied internal rotation moment, the mid-level insert decreased LCL force at 30° and 90° by a median of 25.7 N and 31.7 N, respectively (p = 0.017 and p = 0.012). With an external rotation moment, the mid-level insert decreased MCL force at 30° and 90° by a median of 45.7 N and 20.0 N, respectively (p ≤ 0.017 for all comparisons). With an applied anterior load, MCL and LCL forces showed no differences between the two inserts at 30° and 90° of flexion. Conclusion. The mid-level insert used in this study decreased coronal and axial plane laxities compared to the PS insert, but its stabilizing benefit in the sagittal plane was limited. Both mid-level and PS inserts depended on the MCL to resist anterior loads during a simulated clinical exam of anterior laxity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(6):432–441

Aims. Prior studies have identified that malseating of a modular dual mobility liner can occur, with previous reported incidences between 5.8% and 16.4%. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of malseating in dual mobility implants at our institution, assess for risk factors for liner malseating, and investigate whether liner malseating has any impact on clinical outcomes after surgery. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 239 primary and revision total hip arthroplasties with a modular dual mobility liner. Two independent reviewers assessed radiographs for each patient twice for evidence of malseating, with a third observer acting as a tiebreaker. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine risk factors for malseating with Youden’s index used to identify cut-off points. Cohen’s kappa test was used to measure interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Results. In all, 12 liners (5.0%), including eight Stryker (6.8%) and four Zimmer Biomet (3.3%), had radiological evidence of malseating. Interobserver reliability was found to be 0.453 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.64), suggesting weak inter-rater agreement, with strong agreement being greater than 0.8. We found component size of 50 mm or less to be associated with liner malseating on univariate analysis (p = 0.031). Patients with malseated liners appeared to have no associated clinical consequences, and none required revision surgery at a mean of 14 months (1.4 to 99.2) postoperatively. Conclusion. The incidence of liner malseating was 5.0%, which is similar to other reports. Component size of 50 mm or smaller was identified as a risk factor for malseating. Surgeons should be aware that malseating can occur and implant design changes or changes in instrumentation should be considered to lower the risk of malseating. Although further follow-up is needed, it remains to be seen if malseating is associated with any clinical consequences. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):858–864

Background

Stress fracture of the acromium and scapular spine is a common complication following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), with a reported incidence of 3.1%–11%. There is some evidence associating osteoporosis with increased risk of acromial stress fractures, but little else is known about the causes of acromial stress fractures after RSA. This study aims to define better preoperative factors, including demographics, comorbidities, and diagnoses, which predispose patients to postoperative acromial stress fractures.

Abstract. Introduction. This study compared biomechanical and functional parameters of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant (Cemented Zimmer Hi-Flex) against healthy older adults to determine whether knee biomechanics was restored in this patient population. Methodology. Patients with a primary TKA and healthy adults >55 years old with no musculoskeletal deficits or arthritis participated. Bilateral knee range of motion (RoM) was assessed with a goniometer, then gait patterns were analysed with a 3D motion-capture system. An arthrometer then quantified anterior-posterior laxity of each knee. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS (α=0.05; required sample size: n=21 per group). Results. 25 knees were replaced in 21 patients. Nine presented with fixed flexion deformities (FFD) (13.3±5.6°). FFDs were abolished intraoperatively, and the average flexion increased from 124.8±9.1° to 130.9±5.8°. At 9.6±3.2 years postoperatively, the patients achieved poorer RoM than healthy controls (n=23); p<0.0001. These differences were due to limited flexion in the knee. Patients also failed to achieve the same degree of flexion as controls bilaterally during gait. No differences were observed during mid-flexion; a state that has been associated with instability (p=0.614). There were no differences between groups in knee laxity. Conclusion. Patients in this study had similar gait patterns to healthy older adults during mid-flexion, and were no more likely to exhibit anterior-posterior translation of the knee >7mm; a known risk factor of instability. However, the flexion range was poorer. This led to bilateral pathological knee flexion patterns during gait. Further research should identify the cause of these limitations

PROBLEM. Since the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, there has been a marked rise in the use of telemedicine to evaluate patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Telemedicine is helpful to maintain patient contact, but it cannot provide objective functional TKA data. External monitoring devices can be used, but in the past have had mixed results due to patient compliance and data continuity, particularly for monitoring over numerous years. This novel stem is a translational product with an embedded sensor that can remotely monitor patient activity following TKA. SOLUTION. The Canturio™ TE∗ System (Canary Medical) functions structurally as a tibial extension for the Persona® cemented tibial plate (Zimmer Biomet). The stem is instrumented with internal motion sensors (3-D accelerometer and gyroscope) and telemetry that collects and transmits kinematic data. Raw data is converted by analytics into clinically relevant gait metrics using a proprietary algorithm. The Canturio™ TE∗ will monitor the patient's gait daily for the first year and then with lower frequency thereafter to conserve battery power enabling the potential for 20 years of longitudinal data collection and analysis. A base station in the OR activates the device and links the stem and data to the patient. A base station in the patient's home collects and uploads data to the Cloud Based Canary Data Management Platform (Canary Medical). The Canary Cloud is structured as an FDA regulated and HIPPA-compliant database with cybersecurity protocols integrated into the architecture. A third base station is an accessory used in the health care professional's office to perform an on-demand gait analysis of a patient. A dashboard allows the health care professional and patient to monitor objective data of the patient's activity and progress post treatment. MARKET. The early target market for this device includes total joint surgeons who are early adopters of technology and currently utilize technology in their practice. The kinematic data provided by the Canturio™ TE∗ System will enable clinicians to augment patient care by reviewing their objective gait metrics. In the future, this data has the potential to be integrated with other Zimmer Biomet technologies, such as the Rosa™ Knee robotic platform, mymobility™, and sensored devices like iAssist™, to provide the surgeon with a complete pre-surgical functional assessment, intraoperative data, and post-operative functional data. PRODUCT. Persona IQ will be the combination of the proven Persona personalized total knee system with the Canary Medical Canturio™ TE∗. TIMING AND FUNDING. The Canturio™ TE is currently under De Novo FDA review for market clearance; it is not yet available for commercial distribution. The plan is to launch the product in 2021 pending regulatory De Novo grant. This effort is a partnership between Zimmer Biomet and Canary Medical. ∗ The Canturio™ - TE is currently under De Novo FDA review for market clearance; it is not yet available for commercial distribution

Previous studies have reported excellent results with tapered, titanium alloy, porous plasma-sprayed components in patients undergoing uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to examine survival and clinical results at minimum 25-year follow-up. We reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA at our center through 1995 with a specific femoral component, the Mallory-Head Porous (MHP; Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN). This device, marketed in the U.S. until December 2021, was essentially unchanged since its 1984 introduction, except the porous coating was continued circumferentially along the lateral aspect in 1987, a hydroxyapatite-coated option was offered in 1988, and an offset option was added in 1999 after the study period. Three hundred thirty-two patients (396 THA) had a minimum of 25-year follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 47.6 years (range, 21–70 years). Mean follow-up in non-failed patients was 28.7 years (range, 25 to 37 years). There were 31 femoral revisions (7.8%): 9 infection, 3 failure of ingrowth, 5 aseptic loosening, 8 osteolysis revised well-fixed, 2 periprosthetic fracture, 2 polyethylene wear with trochanteric avulsion, 1 component breakage, and 1 malalignment well-fixed. Kaplan-Meier survival with endpoint of stem revision for all causes was 94.8% (95% CI: ±0.9%) at 36.7 years, and survival with endpoint of aseptic loosening/failure of ingrowth was 98.7% (95% CI: ±0.5) at 36.7 years. Harris hip scores improved significantly from 43 preoperatively to 76 most recently. This tapered, titanium, porous plasma spray-coated femoral component continues to demonstrate high long-term survival with a low rate of femoral component revision for any reason or aseptic loosening/failure of ingrowth

Introduction. Acetabular component loosening with associated bone loss is a challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. Trabecular Metal (TM) by Zimmer Biomet has been shown to have greater implant survivorship for all-cause acetabular revision in small cohort retrospective studies. Our study aims to review outcomes of acetabular TM implants locally. Method. This is a retrospective observational study using data from Auckland City and North Shore Hospitals from 1st of January 2010 to 31st of December 2020. Primary outcome is implant survivorship (re-revision acetabular surgery for any cause) demonstrated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary outcome is indication for index revision and re-revision surgery. Multivariate analysis used to identify statistically significant factors for re-revision surgery. Results. 225 cases used acetabular TM implants (shells and/or augments) over 10 years. Indications include aseptic loosening (63%), instability (15%) and infection (13%). Of these, 12% (n=28) had further re-revision for infection (54%) and instability (21%). Median time to re-revision was 156 days (range 11 – 2022). No cases of re-revision were due to failure of bony ingrowth or acetabular component loosening. Ethnicity, smoking status, and age were not risk factors for re-revision procedures. Additionally, previous prosthetic joint infection, ethnicity, sex and age were not significant risk factors for re-revision due to infection. Implant survivorship was 80% at 1 year, 71% at 5 years and 64% at 10 years. Discussion. Main indications for re-revision were infection and instability. Demographic factors and co-morbidities did not correlate with increased re-revision risk. Survivorship is poorer compared to cumulative survivorship reported by the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Explanations are multifactorial and possibly contributed by underestimation of true revision rates by registry data. Conclusions. We need to identify alternate causes for poorer survivorship and review the role of TM implants in acetabular revision within our specified population

Stem loosening can be associated with a wide spectrum of bone loss and deformity that represent key factors for choosing the most appropriate revision implant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the survivorship of a consecutive series of THA revisions using a taper rectangular cementless stem for primary implants (Alloclassic® Zweymuller®, Zimmer Warsaw US) at medium-term follow-up. We retrospectively evaluated 113 patients (115 revisions) who underwent femoral revision with Zweymuller stem with a preoperative Paprosky I (86) or II (29) defects from January 2011 to December 2020. The mean follow up was 6 years (2–10). The median age at time of surgery was 71(41–93) with 60 males and 53 females. Osteolysis/radiolucency were observed in the following Gruen zones: I (91), II (3), III (2), VII (15), V (3), VI (1). Clinical assessment was performed by means of Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), whereas for the radiological analysis we used conventional x-rays of the hips. The statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism v5.0 and data distribution was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test, and Wilcoxon matched paired test was used to test the differences between preoperative and postoperative score. 9 patients were lost to fu (deceased or not available), 104 (106 hips) were evaluated. The mean HHS and VAS significantly improved at final follow-up, going from 33,84 and 5,78 preoperatively to 66,42 and 2,05 postoperatively, respectively. 28 patients (25%) showed unprogressive radiolucent lines in Gruen zones 1 and 7 with no other radiological nor clinical signs of loosening. One patient suffered from recurrence of the infection. The survivorship with stem revision as endpoint was 100%. Alloclassic Zweymüller primary stem showed good medium-term results and survival rate in revision THA for aseptic loosening and second stages of two stage revisions

Aims. Pelvic discontinuity is a challenging acetabular defect without a consensus on surgical management. Cup-cage reconstruction is an increasingly used treatment strategy. The present study evaluated implant survival, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications associated with the cup-cage construct. Methods. We included 53 cup-cage construct (51 patients) implants used for hip revision procedures for pelvic discontinuity between January 2003 and January 2022 in this retrospective review. Mean age at surgery was 71.8 years (50.0 to 92.0; SD 10.3), 43/53 (81.1%) were female, and mean follow-up was 6.4 years (0.02 to 20.0; SD 4.6). Patients were implanted with a Trabecular Metal Revision Shell with either a ZCA cage (n = 12) or a TMARS cage (n = 40, all Zimmer Biomet). Pelvic discontinuity was diagnosed on preoperative radiographs and/or intraoperatively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, with failure defined as revision of the cup-cage reconstruction. Results. The five-year all-cause survival for cup-cage reconstruction was 73.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 61.4 to 85.4), while the ten- and 15-year survival was 63.7% (95% CI 46.8 to 80.6). Survival due to aseptic loosening was 93.4% (95% CI 86.2 to 100.0) at five, ten, and 15 years. The rate of revision for aseptic loosening, infection, and dislocation was 3/53 (5.7%), 7/53 (13.2%), and 6/53 (11.3%), respectively. The mean leg length discrepancy improved (p < 0.001) preoperatively from a mean of 18.2 mm (0 to 80; SD 15.8) to 7.0 mm (0 to 35; SD 9.8) at latest follow-up. The horizontal and vertical hip centres improved (p < 0.001) preoperatively from a mean of 9.2 cm (5.6 to 17.5; SD 2.3) to 10.1 cm (6.2 to 13.4; SD 2.1) and 9.3 cm (4.7 to 15.8; SD 2.5) to 8.0 cm (3.7 to 12.3; SD 1.7), respectively. Conclusion. Cup-cage reconstruction provides acceptable outcomes in the management of pelvic discontinuity. One in four constructs undergo revision within five years, most commonly for periprosthetic joint infection, dislocation, or aseptic loosening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):66–73

Introduction. Long term data on the survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated excellent outcomes; however, with younger, more active patients, surgeons have a renewed interest in improved biologic fixation obtained from highly porous, cementless implants. Early designs of cementless total knees systems were fraught with high rates of failure for aseptic loosening, particularly on the tibial component. Prior studies have assessed the bone ingrowth extent for tibial tray designs reporting near 30% extent of bone ingrowth . (1,2). While these analyses were performed on implants that demonstrated unacceptably high rates of clinical failure, a paucity of data exists on the extent on bone ingrowth in contemporary implant designs with newer methods for manufacturing the porous surfaces. We sought to evaluate the extent of attached bone on retrieved cementless tibial trays to determine if patient demographics, device factors, or radiographic results correlate to the extent of bone ingrowth in these contemporary designs. Methods. Using our IRB approved retrieval database, 17 porous tibial trays were identified and separated into groups based on manufacturer: Zimmer Natural Knee (1), Zimmer NexGen (10), Stryker Triathlon (4) and Biomet Vanguard Regenerex (2). Differences in manufacturing methods for porous material designs were recorded. Patient demographics and reason for revision are described in Table 1. Radiographs were used to measure tibiofemoral alignment and the tibial mechanical axis alignment. Components were assessed using visual light microscopy and Photoshop to map bone ingrowth extent across the porous surface. ImageJ was used to threshold and calculate values for bone, scratched metal, and available surface for bone ingrowth (Fig. 1). Percent extent was determined as the bone ingrowth compared to the surface area excluding any scratched regions from explantation. Statistics were performed among tray designs as well as between the lateral and medial pegs, if designs had pegs available for bony ingrowth. Results. Mean bone ingrowth extent was 51.4% for the tibial tray for the entire cohort. Bone ingrowth extent was statistically greater in the Zimmer NexGen design (63.8%; p=.027) compared to the other three designs (Table 2). Four sets of pegs were excluded from analysis due to lack of porous coatings or pegs having been removed at revision surgery. Across all designs, the medial peg had 45.2% ingrowth and the lateral peg had 66.1% ingrowth. The medial peg for the NexGen design had significantly less bone ingrowth compared to the lateral peg (58.7% vs. 75.4%; p=0.044). No significant differences were found in tibiofemoral alignment or tibial mechanical axis alignment between the implant groups. No significant differences were found among implants revised for aseptic loosening versus any other reason for revision (54% vs 30%; p=.18). Discussion. Our results demonstrate high rates of bone ingrowth extent in contemporary designs, further supporting porous design rationales and a role for additive manufacturing to form enhanced porosity. We plan on exploring staining techniques to confirm our visual inspection. Contemporary designs have shown successful rates for improved longevity for cementless total knee systems. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Automated identification of arthroplasty implants could aid in pre-operative planning and is a task which could be facilitated through artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning. The purpose of this study was to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for automated identification and classification of knee arthroplasty (KA) on radiographs. Methods. We collected 237 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, total KA (TKA), and unicompartmental KA (UKA), as well as 274 radiographs with equal proportions of Smith & Nephew Journey and Zimmer NexGen TKAs. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images available for DLS development. These images were used to train, validate, and test deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) to 1) detect the presence of TKA; 2) differentiate between TKA and UKA; and 3) differentiate between the 2 TKA models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated with area under the curve (AUC) calculated to assess test performance. Results. The DCNNs trained to detect KA and to distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. In both cases, heatmap analysis demonstrated appropriate emphasis of the KA components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the 2 TKA models also achieved AUC of 1. Heatmap analysis of this DCNN showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs for decision making, such as the anterior flange shape of the Zimmer NexGen TKA (Figure 1) and the tibial baseplate/stem shape of the Smith & Nephew Journey TKA (Figure 2). Conclusion. DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific designs. The proof-of-concept of these DCNNs may set the foundation for DCNNs to identify other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) generates customized guides from an MRI- or CT-based preoperative plan for use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PSI software executes the preoperative planning process. Several manufacturers have developed proprietary PSI software for preoperative planning. It is possible that each proprietary software has a unique preoperative planning process, which may lead to variation in preoperative plans among manufactures and thus variation in the overall PSI technology. The purpose of this study was to determine whether different PSI software generate similar preoperative plans when applied to a single implant system and given identical MR images. Methods. In this prospective comparative study, we evaluated PSI preoperative plans generated by Materialise software and Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments software for 37 consecutive knees. All plans utilized the Zimmer Persona™ CR implant system and were approved by a single experienced surgeon blinded to the other software-generated preoperative plan. For each knee, the MRI reconstructions for both software programs were evaluated to qualitatively determine differences in bony landmark identification. The software-generated preoperative plans were assessed to determine differences in preoperative alignment, component sizes, and resection depth. PSI planned bone resection was compared to actual bone resection to assess the accuracy of intraoperative execution. Results. Materialise and Zimmer PSI software displayed differences in identification of bony landmarks in the femur and tibia. Zimmer software determined preoperative alignment to be 0.5° more varus (p=0.008) compared to Materialise software. Discordance in femoral component size prediction occurred in 37.8% of cases (p<0.001) with 11 cases differing by one size and 3 cases differing by two sizes. Tibial component size prediction was 32.4% discordant (p<0.001) with 12 cases differing by 1 size. In cases in which both software planned identical femoral component sizes, Zimmer software planned significantly more bone resection compared to Materialise in the medial posterior femur (1.5 mm, p<0.001) and lateral posterior femur (1.4 mm, p<0.001). Discussion. The present study suggests that there is notable variation in the PSI preoperative planning process of generating a preoperative plan from MR images. We found clinically significant differences with regard to bony landmark identification, component size selection, and predicted bone resection in the posterior femur between preoperative plans generated by two PSI software programs using identical MR images and a single implant system. Surgeons should be prepared to intraoperatively deviate from PSI selected size by 1 size. They should be aware that the inherent magnitude of error for PSI bone resection with regard to both planning and execution is within 2–3 mm. Users of PSI should acknowledge the variation in the preoperative planning process when using PSI software from different manufacturers. Manufacturers should continue to improve three-dimensional MRI reconstruction, bony landmark identification, preoperative alignment assessment, component size selection, and algorithms for bone resection in order to improve PSI preoperative planning process

Introduction. Primary stability is achieved by the press fit technique, where an oversized component is inserted into an undersized reamed cavity. The major geometric design of an acetabular shell is hemispherical type. On the other one, there are the hemielliptical type acetabular shells for enhanced peripheral contact. In the case of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the aseptic loosening may be induced by instability due to decreased in the contact area between the acetabular shell and host bone. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of reaming size on the primary stability of two different outer geometry shells in DDH models. Materials and methods. The authors evaluated hemispherical (Continuum Acetabular Shell, Zimmer Biomet G.K.) and hemielliptical (Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular Shell, Zimmer Biomet G.K.) acetabular shells. Both shells had a 50 mm outer diameter and same tantalum 3D highly porous surface. An acetabular bone model was prepared using a solid rigid polyurethane foam block with 20 pcf density (Sawbones, Pacific Research Laboratories Inc.) as a synthetic bone substrate. Press fit conditions were every 1 mm from 4 mm under reaming to 2 mm over reaming. To simulate the acetabular dysplasia the synthetic bone substrate was cut diagonally at 40°. Where, the acetabular inclination and cup-CE angle were assumed to 40° and 10°, respectively. Acetabular components were installed with 5 kN by a uniaxial universal testing machine (Autograph AGS-X, Shimadzu Corporation). Primary stability was evaluated by lever-out test. The lever-out test was performed in 4 mm undersized to 2 mm oversized reaming conditions. Lever out moment was calculated from the multiplication of the maximum load and the moment arm for primary stability of the shell. The sample size was 6 for each shell type. Results. The hemisphererical acetabular shell had the maximum lever out moment in 3 mm under reaming condition (7.4 ± 0.4 N·m). The hemielliptical acetabular shell had the maximum lever out moment in 1 mm under reaming condition (8.7 ± 0.8 N·m). Furthermore, the lever out moment of the hemielliptical acetabular shell was significantly 1.2 times greater by the t-test than the hemispherical acetabular shell under the maximum primary fixation conditions. Discussion. The risk parameter of the acetabular loosening is indicated the lack of lateral bony support. The hemielliptical shell was not adversely effected more than the hemispherical shell. Furthermore, the reaming condition of the most primary fixation on the hemielliptical shell was 1 mm under reaming, and was a more general operating procedure than the hemispherical shell (3 mm under reaming). From this study, it was suggested that the hemielliptical shell might be expected excellent clinical outcomes in severe acetabular dysplasia hips. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The aim of this study is the comparative assessment of long term clinical (subjective and objective), functional and quality of life outcome data between primary and revision THA. 122 patients (130 hips) who underwent cementless revision THA of both components (TMT cup, Wagner SL stem, Zimmer Biomet) for aseptic loosening only (Group A) were compared to a matched group of 100 patients (100 hips) who underwent cementless primary THA for osteoarthritis (Synergy stem, R3 cup, Smith & Nephew) (Group B). Outcomes were evaluated with survival analysis curves, Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford hip score (OHS), Short form-12 health survey (SF-12) and EQ-5D-5L scales. Mobility was assessed with walking speed, timed up and go test (TUG), Parker mobility, Lower extremity function score (LEFS) and UCLA scores. At a mean follow up of 14.4 years (10 to 20) a cumulative success rate of 96% (95% CI 96 to 99%) in Group A and 98% (95% CI 97 to 99%) in Group B with operation for any reason as an end point was recorded. Statistically significant differences between groups were developed for WOMAC (Mann-Whitney U test, p= 0.014), OHS (Mann-Whitney U test, p= 0.020) and physical component of SF-12 scores (Mann-Whitney U test, p= 0.029) only. In Group A, in multiple regression analysis, patients’ cognition (p=0.001), BMI (p=0.007) and pain (p=0.022) were found to be independent factors influencing functional recovery (WOMAC). Similarly, pain (p=0.03) was found to influence quality of life (EQ-5D-5). In the long term, revision THA shows satisfactory but inferior clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes when compared to primary THA. Residual pain, BMI and cognitive impairment independently affect functional outcomes

Aim. There has been a significant reduction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures recorded in Australia. This follows several national joint registry studies documenting high UKA revision rates when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the recent introduction of robotically assisted UKA procedures, it is hoped that outcomes improve. This study examines the cumulative revision rate of UKA procedures implanted with a newly introduced robotic system and compares the results to one of the best performing non-robotically assisted UKA prostheses, as well as all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures. Methods. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR) for all UKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA) between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Procedures using the Restoris MCK UKA prosthesis implanted using the Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted System were compared to non-robotically assisted Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System (ZUK) UKA, a commonly used UKA with previously reported good outcomes and to all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship. Results. There was no difference in the rate of revision when the Mako-assisted Restoris UKA was compared to the ZUK UKA (zero to nine months: HR 1.14 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.83; p = 0.596) vs nine months and over: HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; p = 0.058)). The Mako-assisted Restoris had a significantly lower overall revision rate compared to the other types of non-robotically assisted procedures (HR 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.79); p < 0.001) at three years. Revision for aseptic loosening was lower for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to all other non-robotically assisted UKA (entire period: HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.65); p = 0.001), but not the ZUK prosthesis. However, revision for infection was significantly higher for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to the two comparator groups (ZUK: entire period: HR 2.91 (95% CI 1.22 to 6.98; p = 0.016); other non-robotically assisted UKA: zero to three months: HR 5.57 (95% CI 2.17 to 14.31; p < 0.001)). Conclusion. This study reports comparable short-term survivorship for the Mako robotically assisted UKA compared to the ZUK UKA and improved survivorship compared to all other non-robotic UKA. These results justify the continued use and investigation of this procedure. However, the higher rate of early revision for infection for robotically assisted UKA requires further investigation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):319–328

Purpose: Tribological studies of hip arthroplasty suggest that larger diameter metal-on-metal (MOM) articulations would produce less wear than smaller diameter articulations. Other advantages of these large femoral head implants include better stability with lower dislocation rates and improved range of motion. The aim of the present study was to compare chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co) and titanium (Ti) ion concentrations up to one year after different large diameter MOM total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Method: One hundred and twelve patients were randomized to receive large (femoral head > 36 mm diameter) metal-on-metal articulation THA (LDH) from one of the following companies: Zimmer, Smith & Nephew, Biomet or Depuy. Samples of whole blood were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at six months and one year. Cr, Co and Ti concentrations were measured by high-resolution mass spectrometry in an independent laboratory. All LDH implants have a modular Cr-Co tapered sleeve for leg length adjustment, except for Biomet with its sleeve made of Ti. All groups had Ti stems, and Zimmer and Biomet had, in addition, a Ti acetabular porous surface for secondary fixation. We undertook statistical analysis (SPSS 14.0) with p< 0.05 as significant. Results: The groups were comparable in respect to pre-operative parameters (age, gender ratio, body mass index, etc.) as well as post-operative functional scores at six months and one year. We found that Biomet, Depuy and Smith & Nephew LDH had similar Co ion levels at 12 months post-op with 1.5, 1.4 and 1.6 ug/L, respectively. Durom LDH had the highest Co level with 2.3 ug/L (p< 0.01 versus the three other groups). The highest Ti ion levels were observed in the Zimmer group with 3.2 ug/L (p< 0.01 versus the three other groups) and the Biomet group with 2.0 ug/L (p=0.01 versus Zimmer and NS versus the other 2). Ti levels tripled versus pre-op for BHR and ASR (0.5 versus 1.5 and 0.5 versus 1.4 ug/L). Conclusion: Different implant factors may influence metal ion levels measured in whole blood: articular surface wear and implant passive corrosion. Zimmer’s Durom LDH presents higher Co levels than the other groups. Since previously-published Durom hip resurfacing (same bearing characteristics as Durom LDH) showed much lower Co ion results, the modular sleeve may be incriminated. The plasma-sprayed acetabular surface of Zimmer’s and Biomet’s components seems to be responsible for the significant difference in Ti versus the other implants. Biomet’s plasma-sprayed Ti appears to be less prone to corrosion than Durom’s plasma spray coating. When evaluating metal ion release from MOM THA, total metal load from the implants should be considered, and newer implant designs should be evaluated scientifically before their widespread clinical use. LDH-THA should be seen as an improvement and should not be blamed as the source of metal ion release when a specific implant produces unsatisfactory results