Aims. Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest. Methods. A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS). Results. In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures. Conclusion. A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):236–242

Aims. The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study was performed to provide clarity in open fracture management previously skewed by small, specialist centre studies and large, unfocused registry investigations. We report the current management metrics of open fractures across the UK. Method. Patients admitted to hospital with an open fracture (excluding phalanges or isolated hand injuries) between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 were included. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture software. All domains of the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Open Fracture Management were recorded. Results. Across 51 centres, 1,175 patients were analyzed. Antibiotics were given to 754 (69.0%) in the emergency department, 240 (22.0%) pre-hospital, and 99 (9.1%) as inpatients. Wounds were photographed in 848 (72.7%) cases. Median time to first surgery was 16 hrs 14 mins (interquartile range (IQR) 8 hrs 29 mins to 23 hrs 19 mins). Complex injuries were operated on sooner (median 12 hrs 51 mins (IQR 4 hrs 36 mins to 21 hrs 14 mins)). Of initial procedures, 1,053 (90.3%) occurred between 8am and 8pm. A consultant orthopaedic surgeon was present at 1,039 (89.2%) first procedures. In orthoplastic centres, a consultant plastic surgeon was present at 465 (45.1%) first procedures. Overall, 706 (60.8%) patients required a single operation. At primary debridement, 798 (65.0%) fractures were definitively fixed, while 734 (59.8%) fractures had fixation and coverage in one operation through direct closure or soft-tissue coverage. Negative pressure wound therapy was used in 235 (67.7%) staged procedures. Following wound closure or soft-tissue cover, 509 (47.0%) patients received antibiotics for a median of three days (IQR 1 to 7). Conclusion. OPEN provides an insight into care across the UK and different levels of hospital for open fractures. Patients are predominantly operated on promptly, in working hours, and at specialist centres. Areas for improvement include combined patient review and follow-up, scheduled operating, earlier definitive soft-tissue cover, and more robust antibiotic husbandry. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1073–1080

Aims. Musculoskeletal infection is a devastating complication in both trauma and elective orthopaedic surgeries that can result in significant morbidity. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and complications of local antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic calcium sulphate beads (Stimulan Rapid Cure) in the hands of different surgeons from multiple centres in surgically managed bone and joint infections. Methods. Between January 2019 and December 2022, 106 patients with bone and joint infections were treated by five surgeons in five hospitals. Surgical debridement and calcium sulphate bead insertion was performed for local elution of antibiotics in high concentration. In all, 100 patients were available for follow-up at regular intervals. Choice of antibiotic was tailor made for each patient in consultation with microbiologist based on the organism grown on culture and the sensitivity. In majority of our cases, we used a combination of vancomycin and culture sensitive heat stable antibiotic after a thorough debridement of the site. Primary wound closure was achieved in 99 patients and a split skin graft closure was done in one patient. Mean follow-up was 20 months (12 to 30). Results. Overall, six out of 106 patients (5.6%) presented with sepsis and poorly controlled comorbid conditions, and died in the hospital within few days of index surgery. Out of the remaining 100 patients, control of infection was achieved in 95 patients (95%). Persistence of infection was noted in five (5%) patients. Out of these 95 patients that had good control of infection, four patients (4.2%) with gap nonunion needed Masquelet procedure to achieve union. Conclusion. Our multicentre experience confirmed that surgical debridement along with calcium sulphate bead insertion was effective in treating bone and joint infections without any side effects and complications. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):516–522

The Versajet™ Hydrosurgery system (Smith & Nephew) offers a unique way of performing debridement using a high pressure fluid jet parallel to the surface to draw devitalized soft tissues into a cutting chamber for excision and evacuation. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of the Versajet hydrosurgery system in the treatment of Gustilo and Anderson grade III A and III B open tibial fractures using a pilot scale prospective randomized controlled trial against conventional surgery. The primary variable was the total number of debridements until wound closure. A total of 40 patients were recruited: 16 patients Versajet Plus™ (Smith & Nephew) hydrosurgery vs patients 24 standard surgical debridement. Baseline characteristics were well balanced with respect to the age, mechanism of injury, contamination, wound area, depth, and displacement of the bone. There was some imbalance between treatment groups where more (68.8%) Versajet patients had III A classification; vs. (37.5%) standard surgical debridement patients. The number of debridement procedures before wound closure was for Versajet: 1 debridement procedure for 11 patients (69%), 2 for 3 patients (19%) and 3 for 2 patients (12.5%). For standard surgical patients: 1 debridement procedure for 1 patient (4.3%), 2 for 19 patients (83%) and 3 for 3 patients (13%). There was significant evidence (p<0.001) that Versajet patients required fewer debridement procedures than standard surgical debridement prior to wound closure (ratio Standard: Versajet=1.747). There was no evidence that the number of debridement procedures to achieve wound closure differed between the Gustilo and Anderson grade IIIA and grade IIIB classifications (p=0.692). The median time to wound closure was 3 days (95% CI 3 days, 5 days) for Versajet and 5 days (95% CI 4 days, 8 days) for standard surgically debrided wounds, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.275). There was no evidence (p=0.397) of a difference in the total number of surgical sessions (debridement or debridement with closure) required to close the wound (ratio Standard: Versajet=1.040; 95% CI (0.950, 1.137). There were no instances of post operative infection. This pilot study has shown that on average only a single Versajet Plus hydrosurgery debridement is needed before IIIA or IIIB wounds are ready for closure and there is a trend (not significant) towards the possibility of earlier closure following the use of Versajet compared with standard surgery

Aims. To compare results of institutional preferences with regard to treatment of soft tissues in the setting of open tibial shaft fractures. Methods. We present a retrospective review of open tibial shaft fractures at two high-volume level 1 trauma centres with differing practices with regard to the acute management of soft tissues. Site 1 attempts acute primary closure, while site 2 prefers delayed closure/coverage. Comparisons include percentage of primary closure, number of surgical procedures until definitive closure, percentage requiring soft tissue coverage, and percentage of 90-day wound complication. Results. Overall, there were 219 patients at site 1 and 282 patients at site 2. Differences in rates of acute wound closure were seen (168 (78%) at site 1 vs 101 (36%) at site 2). A mean of 1.5 procedures for definitive closure was seen at site 1 compared to 3.4 at site 2. No differences were seen in complication, nonunion, or amputation rates. Similar results were seen in a sub-analysis of type III injuries. Conclusion. Comparing outcomes of open tibial shaft fractures at two institutions with different rates initial wound management, no differences were seen in 90-day wound complications, nonunion rates, or need for amputation. Attempted acute closure resulted in a lower number of planned secondary procedures when compared with planned delayed closure. Providers should consider either acute closure or delayed coverage based on the injury characteristics, surgeon preference and institutional resources without concern that the decision at the time of index surgery will lead to an increased risk of complication. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:481–487

The aim of this study was to document our experience of acute forearm compartment syndrome, and to determine the risk factors for requiring split skin grafting (SSG) and developing complications post fasciotomy. We identified from our trauma database all patients who underwent fasciotomy for an acute forearm compartment syndrome over a 22-year period. Diagnosis was made using clinical signs and/or compartment pressure monitoring. Demographic data, aetiology, management, wound closure, complications and subsequent surgeries were recorded. Outcome measures were the use of SSG and the development of complications following forearm fasciotomy. 90 patients were identified with a mean age of 33 yrs (range, 13–81 yrs) and a significant male predominance (n=82, p<0.001). A fracture of one or both of the forearm bones was seen in 62 (69%) patients, with soft tissue injuries causative in 28 (31%). The median time to fasciotomy was 12hrs (2–72). Delayed wound closure was achieved in 38 (42%) patients, with 52 (58%) undergoing SSG. Risk factors for requiring a SSG were younger age and a crush injury (both p<0.05). Complications occurred in 29 (32%) patients at mean follow-up of 11 (3–60) months. Risk factors for developing complications were a delay in fasciotomy of >6 hrs (p=0.018), with pre-operative motor symptoms approaching significance (p=0.068). Forearm compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy predominantly affects males and can occur following either a fracture or soft tissue injury. Age is an important predictor of undergoing SSG for wound closure. Complications occur in a third of patients and are associated with an increasing delay in the time to fasciotomy

Objective. The development of surgical site infection in the early weeks following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a challenging problem. There are no evidence-based guidelines to direct the number of surgical debridements prior to definitive wound closure. The purpose of this study was to assess the success of infection resolution, and to identify risk factors for failure, in post-operative infections treated with a single debridement and primary wound closure. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 61 postoperative infections (60 patients) that developed following fracture ORIF that were treated with a single debridement and primary closure. Data was collected from a review of the patients’ medical record. Variables were compared between the two groups using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results. Twenty nine cases (48%) in 28 patients achieved successful outcome following a single debridement and primary closure without hardware removal. Risk factors for treatment failure, identified by multivariate analysis, were AO/OTA classification B and C type fractures (odds ratio = 2.539; 95% confidence interval = 1.110, 5.807; p = 0.027) and elevated C-reactive protein at admission (odds ratio = 1.017; 95% confidence interval = 1.002, 1.032; p = 0.026). Conclusions. Acute postoperative infection following ORIF treated by a single debridement and primary closure with hardware retention is successful in only half of the cases

Introduction. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and vessel loop assisted closure are two common methods used to assist with the closure of fasciotomy wounds. This retrospective review compares these two methods using a primary outcome measurement of skin graft requirement. Methods. A retrospective search was performed to identify patients who underwent fasciotomy at our institution. Patient demographics, location of the fasciotomy, type of assisted closure, injury characteristics, need for skin graft, length of stay and evidence of infection within 90 days were recorded. Results. A total of 56 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 49 underwent vessel loop closure and seven underwent NPWT assisted closure. Patients who underwent NPWT assisted closure were at higher risk for requiring skin grafting than patients who underwent vessel loop closure, with an odds ratio of 5.9 (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 31.24). There was no difference in the rate of infection or length of stay between the two groups. Demographic factors such as age, gender, fracture mechanism, location of fasciotomy and presence of open fracture were not predictive of the need for skin grafting. Conclusion. This retrospective descriptive case series demonstrates an increased risk of skin grafting in patients who underwent fasciotomy and were treated with NPWT assisted wound closure. In our series, vessel loop closure was protective against the need for skin grafting. Due to the small sample size in the NPWT group, caution should be taken when generalising these results. Further research is needed to determine if NPWT assisted closure of fasciotomy wounds truly leads to an increased requirement for skin grafting, or if the vascular injury is the main risk factor

Introduction. Open fractures are managed in the UK guided by standards issued by the BOAST-4 standards. A study was undertaken to evaluate compliance with these standards in a regional trauma unit (MTU), and compared following upgrading to a Major Trauma Centre (MTC). Methods. Compliance was assessed against 11 of the 15 BOAST-4 standards (7, 9, 10 and 15 were not assessed). Patients were included with open diaphyseal tibial fractures (AO 42-), admitted to the department in the year before and the year after the Major Trauma Centre opened. Results. A total of 78 patients were evaluated; 30 within the MTU and 48 as a MTC. Of the 11 standards assessed, 6 (at least in part), achieved 100% compliance in the MTU study, and 5 in the MTC study. Compliance was poor for; antibiotic use in relation to definitive wound closure, formulating a joint plan, and undergoing surgery on a planned trauma list. In contrast, following MTC status antibiotic compliance had improved, as had evidence of joint planning, although antibiotic administration time on admission had declined. Consultant-level orthopaedic and plastic surgeon involvement at first intervention had improved, although plastic surgical input remained predominantly registrar-led. Time from injury to definitive stabilisation improved following MTS status. Discussion. This study demonstrates improvements in many aspects of care for open fracture since the MTC opened. However, further improvements can be made, particularly regarding the early treatment pathway. Since this audit a plastic surgeon with specific interest in lower limb reconstruction has been appointed

To analyse the management of open paediatric tibial fractures treated at a children's Major Trauma Centre (MTC), comparing fixation methods, union and complications. We retrospectively identified all patients admitted to RMCH with an open tibia fracture between 2008 – 2016. Demographics, mechanism, inpatient stay and follow-up management were reviewed. There were a total of 44 patients, with an average age = 10 years (3–15). 93% of cases were caused by road traffic accidents, commonly pedestrian versus car. Older children were more likely to sustain higher grade injuries, requiring increased length of stay. 35 patients had primary / delayed wound closure, 1 patient required fasciotomies and 4/44 needed skin grafts and/or flap. 7 patients were treated in plaster, 9 by elastic nailing, 15 had mono-lateral fixators and 12 with circular frame. The average number of surgeries = 3 (1–7) with older children having increased risk of revision surgery. Monolateral fixators were the most common primary fixation method (n=15), however 60% required revision to ring fixator due to displacement or delayed union. The main risk factor for displacement was inadequate fracture reduction in theatre, as well as those fracture patterns involving butterfly fragments. Union (defined as RUST score = 3 on >3 cortices) was achieved in all patients (ave 6 months). Delayed union was associated with higher grade injuries, those treated with elastic nails demonstrated the longest union time (ave 7.3 months). 21/44 (47.7%) patients had complications, with pin site infection being the most commonly seen. 18% patients suffered a major complications needing further surgery. Various fixation methods can be successfully used to treat these fractures. They demonstrate a high complication rate and often require multiple surgeries, with union taking an average of 6 months. Mono-lateral fixators demonstrate a high revision rate, particularly if the fracture is not well reduced

Introduction. Despite the routine use of irrigation, debridement and systemic antibiotics, there is a high incidence of infection in severe open fractures. The synergistic use of local and systemic antibiotics appreciably reduces infection rates although the time window within which this is effective is unknown. The aim was to determine if delaying treatment of wounds causes higher levels of infection. Methods. A defect was created in the femurs of 90 Sprague-Dawley rats and inoculated with 105CFUs Staphylococcus aureus. At 2, 6 and 24 hours following contamination, the defect was irrigated and debrided. The experimental groups had either vancomycin or tobramycin impregnated PMMA beads placed within the segmental defect. The controls received no further treatment. Two weeks after wound closure, the bacteria within the femur were quantified. Results. Delaying irrigation and debridement resulted in significantly more bacteria (p<0.01) within the control group (2 hr < 6 hr <24 hr). Both locally delivered tobramycin and vancomycin significantly reduced the bacteria (p<0.05) when administered at the earlier time points (2 and 6 hours). Locally-delivered antibiotics were ineffective when delivered at 24 hours. Conclusion. Delaying treatment of contaminated defects reduces its effectiveness to eradicate infection. This is presumably because of the biofilm formation by the bacteria. Biofilms begin to form within a couple of hours and are mature within 12 hours. Early treatment of the wound allows the surgeon to physically remove the bacteria or have antibiotics present before a mature biofilm protects the bacteria

Introduction. The peri-operative analgesic management of patients having either Total Knee Replacement (TKR) or Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is an area that continues to have prominence, driven in part by the desire to reduce hospital stay, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. This is particularly relevant in the current climate of healthcare cost savings. We evaluated the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection after identifying that an appreciable number of patients in the unit suffered “breakthrough pain” on the first post-op day, when the effects of local analgesia are wearing off. Method. 43 patients, who were scheduled to have a cemented Oxford UKR, were prospectively recruited and randomised. All patients had the same initial anaesthetic regime of general anaesthesia, femoral nerve block and intra-operative intra-articular infiltration of the cocktail. All patients had a 16G multi-holed epidural catheter placed intra-articularly prior to wound closure. Patients had the same operative technique, post operative rehabilitation and rescue analgesia. An independent observer recorded post-operative pain scores using a visual analogue score (1–10) every 6 hours and any rescue analgesia that was required. On the morning after surgery, 22 patients, (Group I), received 20 mls of 0.5% bupivicaine through the catheter whilst 21 patients, (Group II), had 20 mls of normal saline by the same observer, (who was blinded to the contents of the solution being injected), after which the catheter was removed. Results. When comparing these two groups there was no statistical difference found in their pain scores on the day of operation. However, patients in Group I had a significantly better pain score initially post top up and then at 6 hours (2.4 (0–8) vs 5.7 (2–9), Mann-Whitney p<0.001). This cohort of patients required less rescue analgesia (22% vs 75%, Mann-Whitney p<0.001). In addition, Group I had statistically significant higher patient satisfaction outcome scores after the infiltration, (p<0.001), with 16 reporting very good satisfaction in comparison to 1 in Group II. There were no complications in either group. Discussion. Our study has shown that injection of local anaesthesia via an intra-articular catheter does reduce pain scores when compared to placebo. This implies that this technique may have a role in providing optimal pain relief after UKR

Aims

Ankle fracture fixation is commonly performed by junior trainees. Simulation training using cadavers may shorten the learning curve and result in a technically superior surgical performance.

Aims

The aim of the present study was to assess the outcomes of the induced membrane technique (IMT) for the management of infected segmental bone defects, and to analyze predictive factors associated with unfavourable outcomes.

Objective. Ankle fractures are frequent and seem to be easy to handle in most cases. Of course, also these easy fractures can cause infections that must be carefully managed. What risk factors do we find? What options do we have in treating these complications? What are the consequences and what will the result for the patient be like, compared to non-infected cases?. In a retrospective study we included 82 patients treated with an osteosynthesis in ankle fractures (AO 44 B or C fractures). Average age was 52.4 years (range 20–84 years, median 51.0). Results. In 9 (10.9%) patients there were septic complications. Concerning risk factors, we found 4 (44.4%) patients with nicotine abuse, 2 (22.2%) with additional alcohol abuse. Average stay in hospital was 39.6 days (range 9–95 days). In 4 (44.4%) cases local infection was treated with antibiotics and rest alone. 5 (55.5%) of the patients had additional operations due to infection, in average 5.4 per patient (range 1–10). Early implant removal was done in 3 (33.3%) cases, in average after 3 months. We found 2 (22.2%) infections due to Staphylococcus aureus, 1 (11.1%) due to MRSA and one infection with MRSA and Proteus mirabilis. In one case vacuum dressing had been applied for 44 days. In another case infection could only be healed with an intramedullary vancomycin augmented spacer and finally a screw arthodesis of the ankle, this was a patient with proven arteriosclerosis of the lower extremities. All other fractures finally showed bony healing in xrays. No plastic surgery (e.g. flaps) was needed to close a wound definitely. In follow up (in average after 33 months, range 17–42), the average AOFAS of these patients was 76.5 (range 35–100, median 81.5), compared to an average AOFAS of 89.4 (range 35–100, median 98.0) of all patients. No patient developed a septic syndrom, no ICU stay occurred because of the infection. Conclusions. In spite of most cases of ankle fractures having good outcomes without complications, once infected an ankle osteosynthesis can be a serious problem for both surgeon and patient. Consequent surgical therapy at the right time including early hardware removal, spacers or vacuum dressing if necessary as well as an antibiotic regime addressing problematic pathogens like MRSA are needed to control infections. Problems remaining are functional outcome and wound closure in this sensitive area. Plastic surgery might be needed

Aims

Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS) classification of open fractures and economic costs.

Aims

This study aims to estimate economic outcomes associated with 30-day deep surgical site infection (SSI) from closed surgical wounds in patients with lower limb fractures following major trauma.

Aims

Despite long-standing dogma, a clear relationship between the timing of surgical irrigation and debridement (I&D) and the development of subsequent deep infection has not been established in the literature. Traditionally, I&D of an open fracture has been recommended within six hours of injury based on animal studies from the 1970s, however the clinical basis for this remains unclear. Using data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of 2,447 open fracture patients, the primary objective of this secondary analysis is to determine if a relationship exists between timing of wound I&D (within six hours of injury vs beyond six hours) and subsequent reoperation rate for infection or healing complications within one year for patients with open limb fractures requiring surgical treatment.

Aims

To identify the prevalence of neuropathic pain after lower limb fracture surgery, assess associations with pain severity, quality of life and disability, and determine baseline predictors of chronic neuropathic pain at three and at six months post-injury.