Background and Purpose of Study. The Valgus knee in total knee Arthroplasty, is considered a more demanding procedure, often with ligament balance a greater challenge than seen with neutral or Varus knees. It has also frequently been suggested that prostheses with higher levels of constraint be used to avoid late-onset instability. Various lateral release techniques have also been suggested in the literature. This study is aimed at assessing the outcomes of an unconstrained, rotating platform designed prosthesis, the LCS, using our technique, in the management of severe valgus deformity. Methods. 44 knees in 42 patients with a pre-operative valgus deformity of more than 10 degrees were included in our retrospective series. We analyzed the radiographs for the degree of correction, the angle of tibial tray implantation, and femoral implantation angle, tibial slope, as well as the presence (or degree) of lift off and any complications were noted. In this group, 7 had a
Valgus knees present a surgically demanding challenge. Dissimilar bone and soft-tissue deformities compared to varus knees complicate restoration of proper alignment, positioning of components, and attainment of joint stability. Our study examined the relationship between tourniquet time and valgus deformity. A prospective study of all valgus knees were implanted over a 30 month period with Emotion Ortho-pilot version 4.2 Navigation system (BBraun Aesculap, Tutlingen). They were done by a single knee surgeon. Tourniquet times (TT) were recorded digitally with fixed timing criteria. The software recorded all pre- and post-operative deformities. We performed the lateral parapatella approach for all valgus knees. No patella resurfacing was done but all tibiae were cemented. There were a total of 56 valgus knees (1° to 22°, Mean 5.9°, SD 4.9). The TT varied from 42 min to 121 min (mean 72 min, SD 17.4). There was a statistically significant relationship between TT and
The purpose of this retrospective study was to report the results using scarf, first metatarsal osteotomies, in correcting Hallux
Management of a knee with valgus deformities has always been considered a major challenge. Total knee arthroplasty requires not only correction of this deformity but also meticulous soft tissue balancing and achievement of a balanced rectangular gap. Bony deformities such as hypoplastic lateral condyle, tibial bone loss, and malaligned/malpositioned patella also need to be addressed. In addition, external rotation of the tibia and adaptive metaphyseal remodeling offers a challenge in obtaining the correct rotational alignment of the components. Various techniques for soft tissue balancing have been described in the literature and use of different implant options reported. These options include use of cruciate retaining, sacrificing, substituting and constrained implants. This presentation describes options to correct a severe valgus deformity (severe being defined as a femorotibial angle of greater than 15 degrees) and their long term results. 34 women (50 knees) and 19 men (28 knees) aged 39 to 84 (mean 74) years with severe valgus knees underwent primary TKA by a senior surgeon. A valgus knee was defined as one having a preoperative valgus alignment greater than 15 degrees on a standing anteroposterior radiograph. The authors recommend a medial approach to correct the deformity, a minimal medial release and a distal femoral valgus resection of angle of 3 degrees. We recommend a sequential release of the lateral structures starting anteriorly from the attachment of ITB to the Gerdy's tubercle and going all the way back to the posterolaetral corner and capsule. Correctability of the deformity is checked sequentially after each release. After adequate posterolateral release, if the tibial tubercle could be rotated past the mid-coronal plate medially in both flexion and extension, it indicated appropriate soft tissue release and balance. Fine tuning in terms of final piecrusting of the ITB and or popliteus was carried out after using the trial components. Valgus secondary to an extra-articular deformity was treated using the criteria of Wen et al. In our study the majority of severe valgus knees (86%) could be treated by using unconstrained (CR, PS) knee options reserving the constrained knee / rotating hinge options only in cases of posterolateral instability secondary to an inadequate large release or in situations with very lax or incompetent MCL.Purpose
Methods
Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in total knee arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP axis (Whiteside's Line) or epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2- to 3-degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments. The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, posterolateral corner/arcuate complex, posterior capsule, LCL, and popliteus tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general, pie crust release of the IT band is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the posterolateral corner / arcuate and posterior capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle, if necessary. Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant.
Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in total knee arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP Axis (Whiteside's Line) or Epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2- to 3-degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments. The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, Posterolateral Corner/Arcuate Complex, Posterior Capsule, LCL, and Popliteus Tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general Pie Crust release of the ITB is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the Posterolateral Corner/Arcuate Complex and Posterior Capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle, if necessary. Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant.
Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP Axis (Whiteside's Line) or Epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2 to 3 degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments. The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, Posterolateral corner/Accurate Complex, Posterior Capsule, LCL, and Popliteus Tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general Pie Crust release of the ITB is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the Posterolateral corner/Accurate Complex and Posterior Capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle if necessary. Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant.
The approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with severe valgus deformity is controversial. The lateral parapatellar approach has been proposed for several years, but surgical technique of this approach was unusual and difficult. Therefore, we have consistently been selected medial parapatellar approach (MPP) for all cases. In this study, we investigated the short term results of TKA for severe valgus deformity with MPP about clinical and radiographic assessment. Seven knees in seven cases of severe valgus knees with stand femorotibial angle (FTA) less than 160 degrees were enrolled. Osteoarthritis were 6 cases, hemophilic arthropathy was 1 case and no rheumatoid arthritis case. There were 6 female and 1 male, and mean age was 63.6 years (41–75 years). Duration of follow up ranged 3 months to 22.5 months, with mean of 10.9 months. We compared alignment on standing radiograph, range of motion (ROM), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (the JOA) score for osteoarthritic knee pre/postoperatively, and examined post operative complication retrospectively.Objectives
Methods
A significant number of hallux valgus is associated with valgus deviation of 2nd, 3rd and 4th toes. We recommend correction of the valgus deformity of all four rays simultaneously., because recurrence of the hallux valgus is very frequent if only the first ray is realigned. From 1978 to 1990 a series of 236 feet were operated upon for hallux valgus deformity using a distal osteotomy of the first rnetatarsal. These cases were followed up for a mean of 6, 1 years and showed that the recurrence rate was as high as 28%. Our observation was that, in the majority’ of cases, recurrence of the deformity occurred in those feet in which hallux valgus was combined with valgus deformity of the lesser toes due to varus deviation of the corresponded metatarsals. From 1990 to 1998, another series of 386 feet were operated for hallux valgus. In more than one third of them (142 feet in 96 patients) hallux valgus was associated by valgus deformity of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th toes. These cases were operated using a distal osteotomy of the first rnetatarsal combined with osteotomies of lesser metatarsals aiming not only to face metatarsalgia, but to correct valgus deformity of the lesser toes simultaneously. These patients were followed up for a mean of 4.8 years. The results were excellent in 73 feet, good in 47, fair in 17 and poor in 5. The recurrence rate dropped to 7%. If hallux valgus is combined with valgus deformity of the lesser toes, correction of only the first ray creates a gap between first and second toe. Consequently there is no blocking effect toward valgus deviation of the great toe due to the gap remaining between the first and second toe. The above combined procedure seems to give better results with low recurrence rate in comparison with the results of single correction of the first ray.
The aim of our study was to assess the impact that HV has on patients’ quality of life and to correlate each of the above angles to SF-36 sub-scales.
Soft tissue balancing in fixed genu valgum can be challenging and may lead to instability in flexion. Current techniques involve release of the tight secondary structures initially, with the fascia lata and the lateral capsule usually addressed first, and then the posterior capsule if necessary. If ligament testing does not permit neutral alignment in extension, release of the lateral collateral ligament becomes necessary. The most common way of achieving neutral alignment is by lengthening the lateral structures through elevation of the proximal insertion of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). This technique has two drawbacks: the lengthening affects both extension and flexion gaps and may give rise to excessive external rotation of the femoral implant, with too much offset of the rotational centre. Particularly when non-constrained prostheses are used, the resulting lateral instability in flexion can be a problem. An alternative is to perform a release at the level of the distal insertion of the LCL, as advocated by Keblish and Buechel. However, this still induces undue external rotation of the femoral implant. We think that if the situation in flexion before any release is satisfactory in terms of the patella, it should not be changed. This means that in order to maintain optimal patellofemoral function, the flexion gap should be addressed before any release. The task is then to achieve a good extension gap with a well-aligned knee. In fixed valgus deformities, this means distal translocation of the femoral insertion of the LCL by distal sliding lateral condylar osteotomy. This procedure aims to preserve the flexion condition and to allow distal slide of the lateral condylar osteotomised fragment. In doing the osteotomy, it is important to make the lateral fragment sufficiently large to allow relocation of the osteotomised fragment inside the prosthesis. This provides the immediate stability necessary for good healing. We have been using two simple cortical screws to ensure stability of the fragment. This paper reports our experience in 100 cases.