Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

RECURRENCE OF VARUS/VALGUS DEFORMITY AFTER TKR AT 3 YEARS’ FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Aims: Neutral alignment and soft tissue balance are universally accepted as the most important objectives when performing a total knee replacement regardless of the preoperative deformity and implant type. Nevertheless, there is scarce evidence in the scientific literature of the effect of surgical correction on varus/valgus alignment variation during follow-up. We wanted to verify if the femur-tibial alignment after a total knee replacement was maintained at three years’ follow-up, and whether any variation might be correlated to anatomical characteristics before surgery, and to position and fixation of the tibial component within bone.

Methods: We assessed thirty patients with a cemented TKR implant preoperatively, and at one and three years’ follow-up. Lower limb alignment and tibial component position were evaluated manually from antero-posterior radiographs in weight-bearing position. The tibial component varus/valgus migration was measured by Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry.

Results: In spite of the correct alignment obtained during surgery, at 3 years’ follow-up 40% of patients presented an alignment variation of over 3°. The variation of deformity was not correlated with the preoperative deformity, nor with the tibial component position with respect to the tibial shaft nor with its migration.

Conclusions: After total knee arthroplasty, the recurrence of deformity is a common finding in spite of correct alignment obtained during surgery, but it does not influence the clinical result at mid-term follow-up. Anyway the unbalanced forces determining variation in coronal alignment, at a longer follow-up might produce deficiency of soft tissue structures, loosening of the prosthesis component, or polyethylene failure, leading to revision surgery.

The abstracts were prepared by incoming Professor Elena Brach del Prever. Correspondence should be addressed to IORS – President office, Dipartimento di Traumatologia, Ortopedia e Mediciana del Lavoro, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico - Via Zuretti, 29 I-10135 Torino, Italy.