Sclerostin (SOST) is an endogenous inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway to impair osteogenic differentiation and bone anabolism. SOST immunotherapy like monoclonal antibody has been observed to control bone remodeling and regeneration. This study is aimed to develop a SOST vaccine and test its protective effects on estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss in mice. Gene sequences coded SOST peptide putative targeting Wnt co-receptor LRP5 were cloned and constructed into vectors expressing Fc fragment to produced SOST-Fc fusion protein. Mice were subcutaneously injected SOST-Fc to boost anti-SOST antibody. Bone mineral density, microstructure, and mechanical property were quantified using μCT scanning and material testing system. Serum bone formation and resorption markers and anti-SOST levels were measured using ELISA. SOST-Fc injections significantly increased serum anti-SOST antibody levels but reduced serum SOST concentrations. SOST-Fc vaccination significantly reduced estrogen deficiency-induced serum bone resorption markers CTX-1 increased serum bone formation marker osteocalcin. Of note, it significantly alleviated the severity of estrogen-induced loss of bone mineral density, trabecular morphometric properties, and biomechanical forces of bone tissue. Mechanistically, SOSF-Fc vaccination attenuated trabecular loss histopathology and restored immunostaining of Wnt pathway like Wnt3a, β-catenin, and TCF4 in bone tissue along with increased serum osteoclast inhibitor OPG levels but decreased serum osteoclast enhancer RANKL concentrations. Taken together, SOST-Fc vaccination boosts anti-SOST antibody to neutralize SOST and mitigates the estrogen deficiency-induced bone mass and microstructure deterioration through preserving Wnt signalling. This study highlights an innovative remedial potential of SOST vaccine for preventing osteoporosis

Objectives

Surgeons face a substantial risk of infection because of the occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) from patients undergoing high-risk orthopaedic procedures. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of four BBPs among patients undergoing joint arthroplasty in Shanghai, China. In addition, we evaluated the significance of pre-operative screening by calculating a cost-to-benefit ratio.

We studied 51 patients with osteo-articular tuberculosis who were divided into two groups. Group I comprised 31 newly-diagnosed patients who were given first-line antituberculous treatment consisting of isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. Group II (non-responders) consisted of 20 patients with a history of clinical non-responsiveness to supervised uninterrupted antituberculous treatment for a minimum of three months or a recurrence of a previous lesion which on clinical observation had healed. No patient in either group was HIV-positive. Group II were treated with an immunomodulation regime of intradermal BCG, oral levamisole and intramuscular diphtheria and tetanus vaccines as an adjunct for eight weeks in addition to antituberculous treatment. We gave antituberculous treatment for a total of 12 to 18 months in both groups and they were followed up for a mean of 30.2 months (24 to 49). A series of 20 healthy blood donors served as a control group.

Twenty-nine (93.6%) of the 31 patients in group I and 14 of the 20 (70%) in group II had a clinicoradiological healing response to treatment by five months.

The CD4 cell count in both groups was depressed at the time of enrolment, with a greater degree of depression in the group-II patients (686 cells/mm³ (sd 261) and 545 cells/mm³ (sd 137), respectively; p < 0.05). After treatment for three months both groups showed significant elevation of the CD4 cell count, reaching a level comparable with the control group. However, the mean CD4 cell count of group II (945 cells/mm³ (sd 343)) still remained lower than that of group I (1071 cells/mm³ (sd 290)), but the difference was not significant. Our study has shown encouraging results after immunomodulation and antituberculous treatment in non-responsive patients. The pattern of change in the CD4 cell count in response to treatment may be a reliable clinical indicator.