The purpose of this study is to assess the long term results of combined ACL reconstruction and unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR). These patients have been selected for this combined operation due to their combination of instability symptoms from an absent ACL and unicompartmental arthritis. Retrospective review of 44 combined UKR and ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Surgeries included both medial and lateral UKR combined with either revision ACL reconstruction or primary ACL reconstruction. Patient reported outcomes were obtained preoperatively, at one year, 5 years and 10 years. Revision rate was followed up over 13 years for a mean of 7.4 years post-surgery. The average Oxford score at one year was 43 with an average increase from pre-operation to 1 year post operation of 15. For the 7 patients with 10 year follow up average oxford score was 42 at 1 year, 43 at 5 years and 45 at 10 years. There were 5 reoperations. 2 for revision to total knee arthroplasty and 1 for an exchange of bearing due to wear. The other 2 were the addition of another UKR. For those requiring reoperation the average time was 8 years. Younger more active patients presenting with ACL deficiency causing instability and unicompartmental arthritis are a difficult group to manage. Combining UKR and ACL reconstruction has scant evidence in regard to long term follow up but is a viable option for this select group. This paper has one of the largest cohorts with a reasonable follow up averaging 7.4 years and a revision rate of 11 percent. Combined unilateral knee replacements and ACL reconstruction can be a successful operation for patients with ACL rupture causing instability and unicompartmental arthritis

Due to shorter hospital stays and faster patient rehabilitation Unicompartmental Knee Replacements (UKR) are now considered more cost effective than Total Knee Joint Replacements (TKJR). Obesity however, has long been thought of as a relative contraindication to UKR due to an unproven theoretical concern of early loosening. This study is a retrospective review of patient reported outcome scores and revision rates of all UKR with recorded BMI performed by the Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) from January 2011 and September 2021. Patient reported outcome scores were taken preoperatively, at 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years post operatively. These included WOMAC, Oxford, HAAS, UCLA, WHOQOL, normality, pain and patient satisfaction. 873 patients had functional scores recorded at 5 years and 164 patients had scores recorded at 10 years. Further sub-group analysis was performed based on patient BMI of <25, 25–30, 30–35 and >35. Revision data was available for 2377 UKRs performed in Christchurch during this period. Both obese (BMI >30) and non-obese (BMI <30) patients had significantly improved post-operative scores compared to preoperative. Pre-operatively obese patients had significantly lower functional scores except for pain and UCLA. All functional scores were lower in obese patients at 5 years but this did not meet minimum clinical difference. At 10 years, there was significantly lower HAAS, satisfaction and WOMAC scores for obese patients but no difference in Oxford, normality, WHOQOL, UCLA and pain scores. There was no significant difference in the improvement from pre-operative scores between obese and non-obese patients. All cause revision rate for obese patients at 10 years was 0.69 per 100 observed component years compared to 0.76 in non-obese. This was not statistically significant. Our study proves that UKR is an excellent option in obese patients with post-operative improvement in functional scores and 10 year survivorship equivalent to non-obese patients

Patellofemoral unicompartmental joint replacement is a controversial subject with a relatively small evidence base. Of the 50,000 total knee arthroplasties performed each year in the UK, approximately 10% are performed for predominantly patellofemoral arthritis. There are several patellofemoral unicompartmental prostheses on the market with the National Joint Registry recording 745 such prostheses used in 2007. Most evidence in favour of this procedure comes from experience with the Avon prosthesis (Stryker) predominantly from designer-surgeons. The FPV patellofemoral joint replacement (Wright Medical) has been in use in Europe for several years. The instruments have recently been redesigned and the device marketed in the UK. In 2007 the FPV had 5.9% market share (n=44). We present our early experience with the FPV patellofemoral joint replacement, which to our knowledge, is the first clinical outcome series for this prosthesis. 33 consecutive FPV joint replacements in 29 patients were performed between April 2007 and September 2009 for unicompartmental patellofemoral OA. All cases were performed or directly supervised by the senior author. Results are presented with a minimum follow-up of six months. Oxford and American Knee Society scores (AKSS) were obtained on all patients preoperatively and at subsequent outpatient visits. Mean preoperative AKSS knee score was 49.7 points and postoperative scores at 6 months and 1 year were 82.5 and 86.4 respectively. Mean Oxford score preoperatively was 30.4 (37%) and at 6 months and 1 year were 21.3 (56%) and 11.2 (77%) respectively. There were no complications related to the implant. One knee required a secondary open lateral release due to inadequate balancing at the index procedure. Further medium to long-term follow up data are required, but our initial experience with this device is encouraging

Background. Wear and fatigue damage to polyethylene components remain major factors leading to complications after total knee and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A number of wear simulations have been reported using mechanical test equipment as well as computer models. Computational models of knee wear have generally not replicated experimental wear under diverse conditions. This is partly because of the complexity of quantifying the effect of cross-shear at the articular interface and partly because the results of pin-on-disk experiments cannot be extrapolated to total knee arthroplasty wear. Our premise is that diverse experimental knee wear simulation studies are needed to generate validated computational models. We combined five experimental wear simulation studies to develop and validate a finite-element model that accurately predicted polyethylene wear in high and low crosslinked polyethylene, mobile and fixed bearing, and unicompartmental (UKA) and tricompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Low crosslinked polyethylene (PE). A finite element analysis (FEA) of two different experimental wear simulations involving TKA components of low crosslinked polyethylene inserts, with two different loading patterns and knee kinematics conducted in an AMTI knee wear simulator: a low intensity and a high intensity. Wear coefficients incorporating contact pressure, sliding distance, and cross-shear were generated by inverse FEA using the experimentally measured volume of wear loss as the target outcome measure. The FE models and wear coefficients were validated by predicting wear in a mobile bearing UKA design. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE). Two FEA models were constructed involving TKA and UKA XLPE inserts with different loading patterns and knee kinematics conducted in an AMTI knee wear simulator. Wear coefficients were generated by inverse FEA. Results. Predicted wear rates were within 5% of experimental wear rates during validation tests. Unicompartmental mobile bearing back-side wear accounted for 46% of the total wear in the mobile bearing. Wear during the swing phase was 38% to 44% of total wear. Discussion & Conclusions. Crosslinking polyethylene primarily decreased (by nearly 10-fold) the wear generated by cross-shear. This result can be explained by the reduced propensity of crosslinked polyethylene molecules to orient in the dominant direction of sliding. A highly crosslinked fixed-bearing polyethylene insert can provide high wear performance without the increased risk for mobile bearing dislocation. Finite element analysis can be a robust and efficient method for predicting experimental wear. The value of this model is in rapidly conducting screening studies for design development, assessing the effect of varying patient activity, and assessing newer biomaterials. This FEA model was experimentally validated but requires clinical validation

Unicompartmental knee replacement components have gained favor because they replace only the most damaged areas of articular cartilage and the less invasive operation results in a faster patient recovery than traditional TKR. Additionally, they can provide a solution when a full TKR is not yet needed. However, the wear magnitude of such implants is not well understood, primarily due the variation in design and the difficulty of testing them in knee simulators designed to test full TKRs. Modern innovative partial cartilage replacement knee components which are typically even smaller and more bone conservative than unicompartmental implants, are even less common in testing with added challenges. This study investigates the fatigue characteristics of partial cartilage replacement knee components, and the wear of the UHMWPE bearing of a new, truly less invasive unicompartmental design by Arthrex Inc./Florida. Fatigue testing was performed on MTS 858 MiniBionix machines. Two 12mm diameter UHMWPE tibial components were cemented into jigs at 0° posterior slope and were axially loaded at 2Hz for 10 million cycles (Mc) with a sinusoidal profile peaking at 60% of 8 average human bodyweights (3800N) and a load ratio R of 0.1. Two femoral components were tested with the same load profile at 10Hz for 10 million loading cycles (Mc). The femoral components were mounted at 15° flexion and only the anterior half of the implant was supported, replicating a worst-case scenario where fixation had failed on the posterior half of the implant. This resulted in a large bending moment when force was applied that would fatigue the femoral implant. Following the fatigue test, two full wear simulation tests were conducted on four 12mm and four 20mm unicompartmental components on a four-station Instron-Stanmore force-control knee simulator. The spring-based system to simulate soft-tissue restraining forces and torques was adapted to operate the machine in a displacement control mode to achieve the motions of the medial compartment based on ISO 14243-3. The specimens were lubricated with bovine serum (20g/L protein, 37°C) and the simulator was operated at 1Hz. Liquid absorption was corrected through passive-soak-control bearing inserts. The tibial specimens were cleaned and weighed at standard intervals with the usual ISO test protocols. After 10Mc of fatigue testing, both tibial components had deformed by some flattening out but were able to sustain the full load without failure and displayed average stiffness (over the whole 10Mc) of 27,600±1,180 N/mm. Neither partially supported femoral component failed, and the femorals displayed average stiffness (over 10Mc) of 37,500 ±3,280N/mm. After 5Mc of wear testing, the 12mm tibial components displayed a wear rate of 4.56±1.45mg/Mc while the larger 20mm size wore at a lower 2.80±0.39mg/Mc. The results from the fatigue test suggest that this unicompartmental cartilage replacement design will not fail under simple axial loading, even under the extreme case where the tibial implant is receiving the entire share of the load, and the femoral component is only partially supported. In the clinical application, of course some load-sharing with the native unworn cartilage would occur, reducing the stresses on the implant. The results from the wear test showed very low wear for tibial components of this design, lower than many successful TKRs. The larger size tibial components wore less likely due to reduced contact stress. Based on the results of this test, an implant of this type could be a viable option prior to TKR

Since 2005, the author has performed 422 Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasties (UKA) using a mobile bearing. There were 263 females and 119 males, (40 patients had bilateral UKAs) with a mean age of 62 years. The indications were: Isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis with ‘bone-on-bone’ contact, which had failed prior conservative treatment; Medial femoral condyle avascular necrosis or spontaneous osteonecrosis, which had failed prior conservative treatment. Patients were recommended UKA only if the following anatomic requirements were met: Intact ACL, Full thickness articular cartilage wear limited to the anterior half of the medial tibial plateau, Unaffected lateral compartment cartilage, Unaffected patellar cartilage on the lateral facet, Less than 10 degrees of flexion deformity, Over 100 degrees of knee flexion, Varus deformity not exceeding 15 degrees. Exclusion criteria for surgery were BMI of more than 30, prior high tibial osteotomy, and inflammatory arthritis. All cases were performed with a tourniquet inflated using a minimally-invasive incision with a quadriceps-sparing approach. Both femoral and tibial components were cemented. Rehabilitation consisted of teaching the patients 6 exercises to regain strength and range of motion, and weight-bearing as tolerated with a cane began from the evening of surgery. Most patients were discharged home the next morning; bilaterals usually stayed a day longer. We have previously described our results and the factors determining alignment. In a more recent study we have compared the coronal postoperative limb alignment and knee joint line obliquity after medial UKA with a clinically and radiologically (less than Grade 2 medial OA) normal contralateral lower limb. In our series of 423 cases, we have had 1 revision for aseptic loosening of both components, and 4 meniscal dislocations. There have been no cases of wound infections and thromboembolism. We are currently undertaking a review of the 2–10 year follow-up of our cases. The vast majority of our patients have been generally very satisfied with the results. Our study shows that most patients (who have no disease in the contralateral knee) regain their ‘natural’ alignment and joint line obliquity comparable to their contralateral limb. Over the past few years our percentage of UKAs has been steadily rising. UKA serves as a definitive procedure in the elderly. We see it as a suitable procedure in middle-aged patients who want an operation that provides a quick recovery, full function and range of motion, and near-normal kinematics, with the understanding that they have a small chance of conversion to a total knee arthroplasty in the future

INTRODUCTION. Wear and polyethylene damage have been implicated in up to 22% of revision surgeries after unicompartmental knee replacement. Two major design rationales to reduce this rate involve either geometry and/or material strategies. Geometric options involve highly congruent mobile bearings with large contact areas; or moderately conforming fixed bearings to prevent bearing dislocation and reduce back-side wear, while material changes involve use of highly crosslinked polyethylene. This study was designed to determine if a highly crosslinked fixed-bearing design would increase wear resistance. METHODS. Gravimetric wear rates were measured for two unicompartmental implant designs: Oxford unicompartmental (Biomet) and Triathlon X3 PKR (Stryker) on a knee wear simulator (AMTI) using the ISO-recommended standard. The Oxford design had a highly conforming mobile bearing of compression molded Polyethylene (Arcom). The Triathlon PKR had a moderately conforming fixed bearing of sequentially crosslinked Polyethylene (X3). A finite element model of the AMTI wear simulation was constructed to replicate experimental conditions and to compute wear. This approach was validated using experimental results from previous studies. The wear coefficient obtained previously for radiation-sterilized low crosslinked polyethylene was used to predict wear in Oxford components. The wear coefficient obtained for highly crosslinked polyethylene was used to predict wear in Triathlon X3 PKR components. To study the effect design and polyethylene crosslinking, wear rates were computed for each design using both wear coefficients. RESULTS. Wear rates were significantly lower (69%) for the Triathlon fixed-bearing design compared to the Oxford mobile-bearing design (Fig 1, p<0.01). The FEA model predicted 46% of wear occurring at the back side of the mobile bearing (Fig 2). When wear was computed for the Triathlon PKR design using the wear coefficients used for the low crosslinked polyethylene, wear rates increased to 13.9 mg/million cycles. DISCUSSION. We used a combined experimental and computational approach to quantify factors contributing to polyethylene wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. To isolate the effect of crosslinking level and mobile-bearing design, we computed wear rates for both designs using the same wear coefficient obtained for low crosslinked polyethylene. Wear rates in the low crosslinked Triathlon PKR insert increased by more than 160% relative to those in the highly crosslinked Triathlon X3 PKR. The finite element method facilitates computation of relative back-side to front-side wear, which is challenging to obtain experimentally. The back-side wear Oxford mobile bearing was 46% of total wear. Major factors contributing to the difference in wear were back-side wear (46%) and increased crosslinking (63%) with the combined effect having an additive effect. Our FEA-predicted wear penetration rates (0.024 mm/million cycles) also compare well to in vivo studies, which reported penetration rates of 0.022 mm/year for Oxford bearings. A validated computer model is extremely valuable for efficient evaluation of wear performance and design development. In summary, increasing conformity to increase contact area and reduce contact stress may not be the sole predictor of wear performance. A highly crosslinked polyethylene insert in a fixed-bearing design may provide the high wear performance of a mobile-bearing design without the increased risk for bearing dislocation

Aim. To assess the survivorship of unicompartmental replacements (UKR) revised to UKR. Background: Partial revision of UKR, or revision to a further UKR is a rarely performed procedure with some data from the Australian registry suggesting that results are not good, with early revision being required. Method. All revision procedures from initial UKR are prospectively followed and scored as part of our department's knee database. We analysed the 37 cases in our database that showed revision of UKR to UKR. These included cases in the following categories: a) Mobile bearing revised to mobile bearing (n=8) b) Mobile bearing revised to fixed bearing (n=20) c) Fixed bearing revised to fixed bearing (n=9). Results. The survivorship of revisions of mobile UKR to mobile UKR was 87.5% at a mean of 5 yrs. The survivorship of revisions from mobile UKR to fixed bearing UKR was 95% at a mean of 8 yrs. The survivorship of revisions from fixed bearing UKR to fixed bearing UKR was 78% at 15 yr (1 revised at 9yrs, 1 at 12 yrs). Conclusion. Despite the perception that revision of a UKR to another UKR is likely to fail and require early revision, our results suggest that in specific circumstances acceptable survivorship and outcome are possible. MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES

INTRODUCTION:. Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) facilitates the use of smaller sized implants that require less bone resection and allows preservation of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments (ACL and PCL)[1]. Therefore, UKR preserves the intact kinematics and may improve the clinical outcomes especially compared to the outcomes of total knee replacement (TKA). Despite the known benefits of UKR in arthritis limited to one compartment, in multicompartment disease TKA remains the gold standard. Current TKA designs require the sacrifice of the ACL in all cases, whereas the surgeon can decide to use a cruciate sparing or substituting design altering normal knee kinematics. Performing bi-UKR or tri-UKR with traditional instruments is very challenging and rarely done due to the difficulty in establishing the correct spatial relationship of the separate components. Recent advances in robotic surgery have provided the opportunity to utilize partial knee replacements. The MAKO Rio platform is a surgeon-interactive robotic arm with haptic guidance that allows computer assisted planning and intraoperative accurate placement of multiple unicompartmental components including the bi-UKR. Currently there is a lack of understanding about the short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of the bi-UKR compared to the traditional TKA. OBJECTIVES:. The objective of the current study was to investigate the differences in the clinical outcomes of bi-UKR and TKA. METHODS:. In the current study the clinical outcomes of the patients in three groups were obtained who were operated by the same surgeon. Table-1 shows the demographics of the participants. All patients were evaluated via Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the scores were compared to reported scores from standard TKA. One-way ANOVA was performed to determine significance within demographics. The signed consent was obtained from each participant. RESULTS:. Post-operative data were collected at a mean followup time of 12.3 months. The results indicated higher KOOS in individuals in group-1 compared to TKA individuals. No intraoperative complications during implantation were noted for the bi-UKR group. At the latest followup, no revision surgery was required for any of the subjects. CONCLUSION:. Our experience with the bi-UKR has shown promising clinical outcomes with no post-operative complications. These outcomes may be explained by the less invasive nature of bi-UKR surgeries that preserves of the integrity of the both the ACL and PCL ligaments. Additionally, there is a more accurate joint line reconstruction compared to TKA which may reproduce the functional capabilities of the intact knee more closely. Considering these advantages in addition to preservation of bone and less soft tissue destruction, robotically assisted multi-compartment knee replacement may be a viable alternative treatment in select patients

INTRODUCTION. Computer-aided systems have been developed recently in order to improve the precision of implantation of a total knee replacement (TKR). Several authors demonstrated that the accuracy of implantation of an unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) was also improved. Minimal invasive techniques have been developed to decrease the surgical trauma related to the prosthesis implantation. The benefits of minimal-incision surgery might include less surgical dissection, less blood loss and pain, an earlier return to function, a smaller scar, and subsequently lower costs. However, there might be a concern about the potential of minimal invasive techniques for a loss of accuracy. Navigation might help to compensate for these difficulties. Mobile bearing prostheses have been developed to decrease the risk of polyethylene wear. The benefits might be a better survival and less bone loss during revisions. However, these prosthesis are technically more demanding, and involve the specific risk of bearing luxation. Again, navigation might help to compensate for these difficulties. MATERIAL AND METHODS. We wanted to combine the theoretical advantages of the three different techniques by developing a navigated, minimal invasive, mobile bearing unicompartmental knee prosthesis. 160 patients have been operated on at our institution with this system. The 81 patients with more than 2 year follow-up have been re-examined. Complications have been recorded. The clinical results have been analyzed according to the Knee Society Scoring System. The subjective results have been analyzed with the Oxford Knee Questionnaire. The accuracy of implantation has been analyzed on post-operative antero-posterior and lateral long leg X-rays. The 2-year survival rate has been calculated. RESULTS. We observed 8 complications related to the implant or the operative technique: 2 cases of meniscus instability (1 revision to TKR, 1 bearing exchange); 2 cases of tibia loosening (revised to TKR), 2 cases of femoral loosening (revised to TKR), 1 case of lateral disease progression (revised to TKR), 1 case of unexplained pain syndrome (revised to TKR). The mean Knee Score was 93 points, 44% had the maximum of 100 points, and only 10% have less than 85 points. The mean pain score was 48 points/50. The mean flexion angle was 128°, and 60% had at least 130° of knee flexion. The mean Function Score was 97 points, 84% have the maximum of 100 points, and only 5% had less than 85 points. The mean Oxford Knee Questionnaire score was 19 points (best result: 12 points, worst result: 60 points). Expected limb axis correction was obtained in 77% of the cases. 62% of the cases had an optimally implanted prosthesis for all studied criteria. The 2-year survival rate was 97%. DISCUSSION. Most of the revision cases were related to technical difficulties during the development phase. Fixation of the implant has been improved, and some imprecise steps of the software have been corrected. Since these changes occurred, no severe early complication related to implant or software has been observed. The current implant is considered reliable, and the current minimal invasive navigated technique is considered reliable as well

Introduction

Although surgical remedies tend to be the long-term solutions for patients with osteoarthritis (OA), many alternatives exist that offer the potential to slow progression, alleviate pain, and/or restore function. One such option is the unloader OA knee brace. The objective of this study was to assess the in vivo medial joint space narrowing with and without the brace during weight-bearing portion of gait.

The Oxford mobile bearing knee prosthesis (Zimmer Biomet Inc, Warsaw, Ind) is considered a good treatment option for isolated medial compartment knee arthrosis. From February 2001 until August 2016, 1719 primary Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement procedures were completed at our center by a group of seven surgeons. We undertook this study to examine the long-term survivorship of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement looking at survivorship and reasons for failure.

A retrospective consecutive case series review was completed, and all revisions and re-operations were identified. Conversion to total knee replacement (TKA) was considered a failure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the 15-year survivorship of the group overall. We specifically looked at age, gender, BMI and surgeon caseload in addition to the reasons for failure. A statistical analysis was performed and differences in survivorship were compared for the variables listed. A logistic cox regression was performed to explore predictors of revision.

Overall 15-year survivorship was 89.9%. Female survivorship of 88.1% was statistically worse than the male group at 91.8% (p=0.018). Younger patients (75yrs of age (p= 0.036). There was a large range in surgical case load by individual surgeons (range 17–570 knees). There were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, or gender when comparing the individual surgeon groups. There was a large range in 15-year survivorship between individual surgeons (range 78.3% – 95%). Overall the most common reason for revision was due to wear of the unreplaced portion of the knee (lateral and/or patella-femoral joint) followed by aseptic loosening, polyethylene dislocation, infection or persistent pain.

The 15-year survivorship results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement at our center compares favourably to other published series and large registry data series. We found a reduction in survivorship in female patients and younger patients (< 5 5yrs). There were also significant differences in survivorship based on the individual surgeon. A more selective patient approach yielded the best long-term survivorship and equivalent to that of total knee replacement. We therefore suggest using a more selective approach when choosing patients for a medial unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford mobile bearing prosthesis in order to enhance long-term survivorship.

Enhanced appreciation of normal knee kinematics and the inability to replicate these in the replaced total knee has led to increased enthusiasm for partial knee arthroplasty by some. These arthroplasties more closely replicate normal kinematics since they inherently preserve the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Indications for medial UKA are: anteromedial osteoarthritis with an intact ACL, posterior cruciate ligament, and medial collateral ligament (MCL), full thickness cartilage loss, and correctable deformity demonstrated radiographically with valgus stress view; full thickness cartilage laterally with no central ulcer; <15 degrees of flexion contracture, < 15 degrees varus and > 90 degrees flexion. The state of the patellofemoral joint, chondrocalcinosis, obesity, age and activity level are NOT contraindications to medial mobile-bearing UKA. The only certain contraindications are the presence of inflammatory arthritis or a history of previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Advantages of medial UKA are that it preserves undamaged structures, it is a minimally invasive technique with low incidence of perioperative morbidity, preservation of the cruciate mechanism results in more “normal” kinematics versus TKA, it normalises contact forces and pressures in the patellofemoral joint, and it provides better range of motion than TKA. Furthermore, medial UKA results in better function than TKA in gait studies, with demanding activities, such as climbing stairs, having a better “feel”. Pain relief with medial UKA is equivalent or better than TKA, and morbidity and mortality are decreased compared with TKA, as well as venous thromboembolism. Recommended preoperative imaging studies consist of plain radiographs with the following views obtained: standing AP, PA flexed, lateral, Merchant or axial, and valgus stress. There are several surgical perils associated with performing medial UKA. First, in regard to patient selection, avoid medial UKA in patients with residual hyaline cartilage – the joint must be bone on bone. Second, perform a conservative tibial resection with respect to depth to prevent tibial collapse as well as excessive overload of weakened bone, and avoid excessive posterior slope. Perform the tibial resection coplanar with tibial spine/ACL insertion to maximise tibial coverage. Avoid overcorrection of deformity. Do not perform a medial release. Balance flexion/extension gaps meticulously. For mobile-bearing designs, remove all impinging osteophytes. Over 55 published studies report results with mobile-bearing medial UKA, with survival ranging 63.2–100% at mean follow-up ranging from 1 to 17.2 years.

Unicompartmental knee replacements (unis) offer an early option for the treatment of osteoarthritis. However there is no standard method for measuring the wear of unis in the laboratory. Most knee simulators are designed for TKA, for which there is an ISO standard. This study is about a wear method for unis, applied to a novel unicompartmental knee replacement (design by PSW). It has a metal-backed UHMWPE femoral component to articulate against a monoblock metallic tibial component. The advantage is reduced resection of strong bone from the proximal tibia for more durable fixation. The femoral component resurfaces the distal end of the femur to a flexion arc of only 42°, the area of cartilage loss in early OA (Fig. 1). We compared this novel bearing couple to the same design but with the usual arrangement of femoral metal and tibial plastic. Our hypothesis was that the wear of the reversed materials would be comparable to conventional and within the range of TKR bearings.

The test was conducted on a 4-station Instron-Stanmore force-controlled knee simulator. Both specimen groups (n=4 each) were highly crosslinked UHWMPE stabilized with vitamin E. On each of the four stations, one uni system was mounted on the medial side and one on the lateral, as if a standard TKR was being tested. The ISO-14243-1 walking cycle force-control waveforms were applied for 5 million cycles (Mc) at 1Hz, but with the maximum flexion during the swing phase (usually 58°) curtailed to 35° to maintain the contact within the arc of the femoral component. In-vivo this implant would be inlaid into the distal medial femoral condyle and the articulating surface immediately transitions into native cartilage. In our test set-up there was no secondary surface as such. The reduced flexion occurred during the swing phase where compressive load was low and the effect on the wear would be negligible. Wear was measured gravimetrically at many intervals and corrected by the weight gain of extra two active soak controls per group.

After 5 Mc, the average rates of gravimetric weight loss from the UHMWPE femoral and tibial bearings were 4.73±0.266 mg/Mc and 3.07±0.388 mg/Mc, respectively (statistically significantly different, p=0.0007) (Fig. 2). No significant difference was found in wear between medial and lateral placement for specimens of the same type, although the medial side generally wore more. Although the plastic femorals of the reverse design wore more than the plastic tibials, the wear was still low at <5 mg/Mc. The range for typical TKRs using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, tested under the same conditions in our laboratory has been 2.85–24.1 mg/Mc.

In summary, we adapted the ISO standard TKA wear test for the evaluation of unis, and in this case, a uni with reversed materials. Based on the wear results, this type of ‘early intervention’ design could therefore be a viable option, offering simplicity with less modular parts as well as load sharing with the native articular cartilage.

Introduction

Isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) occurs in 5–10% of knees with OA [1, 2]. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (LUKA) emerged as a treatment to this disease in the early 80s but challenging surgical technique has limited the prevalence of this treatment option [1–3]. A robotic-arm assisted surgical technique (MAKO Surgical Corp.) has emerged as a way to achieve precise implant positioning which can potentially improve surgical outcomes.

Introduction

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has seen renewed interest in recent years and is a viable option for patients with limited degenerative disease of the knee as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty. However, the minimally invasive UKA procedure is challenging, and accurate component alignment is vital to long-term survival. Robotic-assisted UKA allows for greater accuracy of component placement and dynamic intraoperative ligament balancing which may improve clinical patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical outcomes in a large, consecutive cohort of patients that underwent robotic-assisted UKA at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The study hypothesis was that robotic-assisted UKA improves patient outcomes by decreasing the rate of revision in comparison to conventional UKA.

The knee is one of the most commonly affected joints in osteoarthritis. Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKA) was developed to address patients with this disease in only one compartment. The conventional knee arthroplasty jigs, while usually being accurate, may result in the prosthesis being inserted in an undesired alignment which may lead to poor post-operative outcomes. Common modes of failure in UKA include edge loading due to incorrect sizing or positioning, development of disease in the other compartment due to over-stuffing or over-correction and early loosening or stress fractures due to inaccurate bone cuts.

Computer navigation and robotically assisted unicompartmental knee replacement were introduced in order to improve the surgical accuracy of both the femoral and tibial bone cuts. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy and reliability of robotic assisted, unicondylar knee surgery in producing reported bony alignment.

Two hundred and twenty consecutive patients with a mean age of 64 + 11 years who underwent successful medial robotic assisted unicondylar knee surgery performed by two senior total joint arthroplasty surgeons were identified retrospectively. The mean body mass index of the cohort was 33.5 + 8 kg/m² with a minimum follow-up of 6 months (range: 6–18 months). Femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal alignments as well as the posterior slope of the tibial component were measured in the post-operative radiographs. These measurements were compared with the equivalent measurements collected during intra-operative period by the navigation to study the reliability and accuracy of femoral and tibial cuts. Radiographic evaluation was independently conducted by two observers.

There was an average difference of 2.2 to 3.6 degrees between the intra-operatively planned and post-operative radiological equivalent measurements. For the femur, mean varus/valgus angulation was 2.8 + 2.5 degrees with 83% of those measured within 5% of planned. For the tibia mean varus/valgus angulation was 2.4 + 1.9 degrees with 93% within 5% of planned resection. There was minimal inter-observer variability between radiographic measurements. There were no infections in the evaluated group at the time of radiographic examination.

Alignment for unicondylar knee arthroplasty is important for implant survival and is a more difficult procedure to instrument as it is a minimally invasive surgery. Assuming appropriate planning, robotically assisted surgery in unicondylar knee replacement will result in reliably accurate positioning of component and reduce early component failures caused by malpositioning. A mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography is often caused by poor cementing technique of the prosthesis rather than incorrect bony cuts. Addressing these factors can lead to greater success and improved outcomes for patients.

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an established treatment for single compartment end-stage knee arthrosis with good recorded survivorship. Although often used in more active, younger patients, patient selection remains controversial. To identify risk factors for early failure we compared patients with UKR failure requiring revision to total knee replacement (TKR) with a control group.

Between September 2002 and 2008, 812 Oxford Mobile Bearing Medial UKRs were implanted. 21 implants (20 patients) required revision to TKR within 5 years. The leading cause for revision was lateral compartment disease progression (11 patients). In the revision group, 17 patients were female (81%), average age at index surgery was 64.1 (range 48–81) and average BMI 31.8 (range 24.4–41.5).

Our UKR patients with early failure requiring revision were more likely to be female (p=0.0012) whilst age and BMI were similar between groups. Although the change in tibio-femoral valgus angle was similar, control group patients started in varus becoming valgus post-operatively, whereas revision group patients started in valgus and became more valgus post-operatively. This might explain lateral compartment disease progression as our leading cause of early failure. We believe females with medial compartment disease but valgus alignment are at greater risk of early failure and it is particularly important not to overstuff the medial compartment.

INTRODUCTION

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been shown to have many benefits over conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), but has also been shown to be technically difficult. In fact, technical error is the most common cause of premature failure in UKA. Bicompartmental arthroplasty (BKA) has the potential to perform like TKA with the benefits of UKA. We describe the initial experience with customized alignment guides and implants for UKA and BKA, manufactured based upon preoperative CT scan.

Background

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an established treatment for single compartment end-stage knee arthrosis with good recorded survivorship. Although often used in more active younger patients, patient selection remains controversial. To identify risk factors for early failure we compared patients with UKR failure requiring revision to total knee replacement (TKR) with a control group.