Introduction. Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity. Despite this, only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression. The objectives of the study were to review the pre-operative symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures undertaken and the post-operative outcomes; and investigate and ascertain prognostic factors particularly in cases of persistence of symptoms after the surgery. Methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. A structured proforma was created to document the demographics, patient complaints, method of decompression, per-operative findings and symptom status at the last follow up. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. Analysis of data was carried out using the SPSS software (Version 16.0; Illinois). The significance level was set at 5%. Results. 136 ulnar nerve decompressions formed the study group. Minimum follow-up was three months. Numbness and paresthesia in ulnar distribution were the two most common presenting symptoms (96%). The cause of compression was identified as idiopathic in 58.2%; flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis in 36.7% and Arcade of Stuthers in 5.1% extremities. The outcome was satisfactory in 85.2% of patients. No obvious association was demonstrated between the outcome of surgery and duration of symptoms, presence of co-morbidities or the type of surgery performed. Interestingly out of 12 patients who got worse or had no improvement, nine (75%) had either normal nerve conduction studies or none done pre-operatively. Conclusion. This is the largest review of outcomes after ulnar nerve decompressions at elbow. The study showed that good results (85.2%) of ulnar nerve decompression at elbow in majority of patients regardless of level of surgeon's experience or procedure undertaken

Introduction. Antegrade K wiring of the fifth metacarpal for treatment of displaced metacarpal neck fractures is a well recognized surgical procedure. However it is not without complication and injury to the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve has been reported in up to 15% of cases. Methods. We performed a cadaver study to determine the proximity of this nerve to the K wire insertion point at the base of the fifth metacarpal. K wires were percutaneously inserted under image intensification in sixteen cadaver hands and advanced into the head of the metacarpal. Wires were then cut and bent outside the skin. This was then followed by meticulous dissection of the ulnar nerve from proximal to distal. A number of measurements were taken to identify the distance from the insertion point of the K wire to each branch of this nerve. Results. The distance from the insertion point at the base of the fifth metacarpal to the dorsal component of the nerve averaged 5.6 mm (range 1mm–12mm) and from the volar component was 6 mm (range 1mm–10mm). The heel of the wire was touching the nerve in five cases. Conclusion. Our findings highlight the importance of making a small incision and bluntly dissecting to bone at the base of the fifth metacarpal to protect the nerve. In addition, use of a tissue protector is vital when drilling the 2mm hole at the base of the fifth metacarpal. We have confirmed that the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve is vulnerable during insertion of an antegrade intramedullary K wire for treatment of neck of fifth metacarpal fractures

Aim. To investigate the effectiveness of a decision-based protocol designed to minimise the use of medial incisions when performing crossed-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus whilst minimising ulnar nerve injury. Method. We have employed a protocol for placing the medial wire during crossed k-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures dependent upon the medial epicondyle. When this is palpable, the wire is introduced percutaneously; when it is not, a mini-incision is made. All cases of closed reduction and crossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture over a three year period (2008–2011) were identified from our department database. Cases with a neurological injury identified pre-operatively, and those in which the protocol had not been followed were excluded. Casenotes were reviewed to determine the incidence and outcomes of post-operative ulnar nerve deficit. Results. A total of 106 cases were identified, from which 36 cases were excluded, leaving 70 cases in the study. The mean age was 5 (range 1–11). 68 were extension-type injuries, of which 29 (41%) were type 2 and 39 (56%) type 3 according to the classification of Gartland. 2 were flexion-type. A mini-incision for placement of the medial K-wire was required in only 3 cases (4.3%), with percutaneous placement in all other cases. There was clinical evidence of partial ulnar nerve injury in 1 case (1.4%) which recovered spontaneously within 11 months. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrate our protocol to be effective. Careful percutaneous placement of the medial wire can be performed in the majority of cases with little risk of significant or permanent injury to the ulnar nerve. Open placement of the medial wire is indicated in only a small proportion of cases. We suggest that the routine use of a medial mini-incision should be re-considered

Aim:. To investigate the incidence of post-operative ulna nerve symptoms in total elbow arthroplasty after full in-situ release. Methods:. A retrospective review was completed of the medical records of eighty-three consecutive primary total elbow arthroplasties (TEA) performed between 2003 and 2012. Data analysed included the presence of pre-operative ulnar nerve (UN) symptoms, history of prior UN transposition, intra-operative management of the UN and presence of post-operative symptoms. Results:. One patient had a prior UN transposition. The nerve was transposed at time of TEA in 4 of the 83 elbows (4.8%). The indication for transposition in all 4 cases was abnormal tracking or increased tension on the nerve after insertion of the prosthesis. The remaining 78 TEA's all received a full in-situ release of the nerve. The incidence of post-operative UN symptoms in this group was 7.7% (6/78). Four neuropraxias resolved in the early post-operative period, whilst two patients (2.6%) continued to experience significant UN symptoms requiring subsequent transposition, at 6 weeks and 12 months post TEA. Conclusion:. A 2.6% incidence of significant post-operative UN symptoms compares favourably with systematic reviews in the literature (3–11% incidence of UN complications). We do not believe routine transposition, which adds to the handling of the nerve and increases total surgical time, is necessary, and should be reserved for cases where intra-operative assessment by the surgeon deems it necessary

Supercharged end-to-side nerve transfer for severe cubital tunnel syndrome is a recently developed technique which involves augmenting the ulnar motor branch with anterior interosseous nerve (AIN). Previous studies suggested that this technique augments or “babysits” the motor end plates until reinnervation occurs, however, some authors suggested possible reinnervation by the donor nerve. We present two cases where this transfer was done for rapid progressive (6–9 months) cubital tunnel syndrome. The first case was a 57 year-old right hand dominant female who presented to us with severe right cubital tunnel syndrome clinically, including intrinsic wasting and claw deformity. The patient had significant loss of function and visible atrophy to her hand intrinsics over the last few months. Electrodiagnostic studies confirmed the diagnosis of severe cubital tunnel syndrome demonstrating axonal loss, positive sharp waves and fibrillations in the ulnar nerve distribution distally. The patient underwent cubital tunnel ulnar nerve release, subcutaneous anterior transposition, Guyon's canal release along with an AIN to ulnar motor nerve end-to-side transfer. Patient-based functional outcome instruments were prospectively collected with improved overall pain and function as demonstrated from a quickDASH score of 9.1 1 year post-op in comparison to a score of 34.1 pre-op. Recovery was monitored clinically and electrodiagnostic studies at 6 months and 1 year post-operatively. She demonstrated improved intrinsic muscle bulk and strength. The nerve studies at one year showed reinnervation with large amplitude motor unit potentials in the 1st dorsal interosseous and abductor digiti minimi but the 5th finger sensory response remained absent. The second case was a 58 year-old right hand dominant male diagnosed with severe and progressive right cubital tunnel syndrome. Clinically, he had significant muscle wasting and weakness and confirmed denervation on electrodiagnostic studies. He underwent the same surgical procedure as described for the first case and follow-up regimen. The patient demonstrated improved pain score and significant overall function recovery with a quickDASH score of 11.4 one year post-op in comparison to 72.7 pre-op. Nerve studies at one year confirmed our clinical impression, showing ulnar nerve reinnervation with large amplitude motor unit potentials in the 1st dorsal interosseous, while sensory response remained absent. It is yet unclear if end-to-side nerve transfers allow reinnervation of the target muscles. Previous studies have demonstrated clinical improvement with this transfer, however we are unaware of any electrodiagnostic studies demonstrating this effect. These two cases support the notion of reinnervation after an end-to-side procedure. Further studies are needed to assess outcomes of such nerve transfers

Paediatric supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture in children, and is associated with an 11% incidence of neurologic injury. The goal of this study is to investigate the natural history and outcome of motor nerve recovery following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of this injury. A total of 246 children who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning following supracondylar humerus fractures were prospectively enrolled over a two year period. Patient demographics (age, weight), Gartland fracture classification, and associated traumatic neurologic injury were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Patients with neurologic palsies were separated based on nerve injury distribution, and followed long term to monitor for neurologic recovery at set time points for follow up. Of the 246 patient cohort, 46 patients (18.6%) sustained a motor nerve palsy (Group 1) and 200 patients (82.4%) did not (Group 2) following elbow injury. Forty three cases involved one nerve palsy, and three cases involved two nerve palsies. No differences were found between patient age (Group 1 – 6.6 years old, Group 2 – 6.2 years old, p = 0.11) or weight (Group 1 – 24.3kg, Group 2 – 24.5kg, p = 0.44). A significantly higher proportion of Gartland type III and IV injuries were found in those with nerve palsies (Group 1 – 93.5%, Group 2 – 59%, p < 0 .001). Thirty four Anterior Interosseous Nerve (AIN) palsies were observed, of which 22 (64.7%) made a full recovery by three month. Refractory AIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 6.8 months post injury. Ten Posterior Interosseous Nerve (PIN) palsies occurred, of which four (40%) made full recovery at three month. Refractory PIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 8.4 months post injury. Six ulnar nerve motor palsies occurred, of which zero (0%) made full recovery at three month. Ulnar nerve injuries recovered on average 5.8 months post injury. Neurologic injury occurs significantly higher in Gartland type III and IV paediatric supracondylar fractures. AIN palsies remain the most common, with an expected 65% chance of full recovery by three month. 40% of all PIN palsies are expected to fully recover by three month. Ulnar motor nerve palsies were slowest to recover at 0% by the three month mark, and had an average recovery time of approximately 5.8 months. Our study findings provide further evidence for setting clinical and parental expectations following neurologic injury in paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures

Introduction. Only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression, most comparing various forms of decompression. A review of the case notes of patients undergone ulnar nerve decompressions was undertaken looking at the pre-op symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures and the post-operative outcomes. Material/methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. The significance level was set at 5%. Results. A total of 136 ulnar nerve decompressions formed the study group. Numbness and paraesthesia in ulnar distribution were the two most common presenting symptoms (96%). Majority (68%) had symptoms for over a year before surgery. Simple decompression was done in 110 extremities and rest of the cases required additional anterior subcutaneous transposition. The cause of compression was identified as idiopathic in 58.2%; flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis in 36.7% and Arcade of Struthers in 5.1% extremities. The outcome was satisfactory in 85.2% of patients. No obvious association was demonstrated between the outcome of surgery and duration of symptoms, presence of co-morbidities or the type of surgery performed. Interestingly out of 12 patients who got worse or had no improvement, nine (75%) had either normal nerve conduction studies or none done pre-operatively. Conclusions. This is the largest review of outcomes after ulnar nerve decompressions at elbow. The study showed that good results (85.2%) in majority of patients regardless of level of surgeon's experience or procedure undertaken

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning has become the most common technique for the treatment of Type III displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the loss of reduction in lateral K wiring is non-inferior to crossed K wiring in this procedure. A prospective randomised non-inferiority trial was conducted. Patients aged three to seven presenting to the Emergency Department with a diagnosis of Type III supracondylar humerus fracture were eligible for inclusion in the study. Consenting patients were block randomised into one of two groups based on wire configuration (lateral or crossed K wires). Surgical technique and post-operative management were standardised between the two groups. The primary outcome was loss of reduction, measured by the change in Baumann's angle immediately post –operation compared to that at the time of K wire removal at three weeks. Secondary outcome data collected included Flynn's elbow score, the humero-capitellar angle, and evidence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Data was analysed using a t-test for independent means. A total of 52 patients were enrolled at baseline with 23 allocated to the lateral pinning group (44%) and 29 to the cross pinning group (56%). Six patients (5 crossed, 1 lateral) received a third wire and one patient (crossed) did not return for x-rays at pin removal and were therefore excluded from analysis. A total of 45 patients were subsequently analysed (22 lateral and 23 crossed). The mean change in Baumann's angle was 1.05 degrees, 95% CI [-0.29, 2.38] for the lateral group and 0.13 degrees, 95% CI [-1.30, 1.56] for the crossed group. There was no significant difference between the groups in change in Baumann's Angle at the time of pin removal (p = 0.18). Two patients in the crossed group developed post-operative iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries, while none were reported in the lateral group. Preliminary analysis shows that loss of reduction in Baumann's angle with lateral K wires is not inferior to crossed K wires in the management of Type III supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The results of this study suggest that orthopaedic surgeons who currently use crossed K wires could consider switching to lateral K wires in order to reduce the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries without significantly compromising reduction

In combined high median and ulnar nerve injury, transfer of extensor digiti minimi (EDM) and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) nerve branches to restore intrinsic hand function is previously described. A segment of nerve graft is required in this operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the sensory branch of radial nerve (SRN) as an “in situ vascular nerve bridge'” (IVNB) instead of sural nerve graft. Twenty fresh cadavers were dissected. In proximal forearm incision, the feasibility of transferring the EDM/ECU branches to the distal stump of transected SRN was evaluated. In distal forearm incision, the two distal branches of the SRN were transected near the radial styloid process to determine whether transfer of the proximal stumps of these branches to the motor branches of the median (MMN) and ulnar (MUN) nerves is possible. The number of axons in each nerve was determined. The size of the dissected nerves and their location demonstrate that tension free nerve coaptation is easily possible in both proximal and distal incisions. Utilisation of the SRN as an IVNB instead of the conventional sural nerve graft has some advantages. Firstly, the sural nerve graft is a single branch and could be sutured to either the MMN or MUN, whereas the SRN has two terminal branches and can address both of them. Secondly, the IVNB has live Schwann cells and may accelerate the regeneration. Finally, this IVNB does not require leg incision and could be performed under regional anesthesia. The SRN as an IVNB is a viable option which can be used instead of conventional nerve graft in some brachial plexus or high median and ulnar nerve injuries when restoration of intrinsic hand function by transfer of EDM/ECU branches is attempted

The patterns of nerve and associated skeletal injury were reviewed in 84 patients referred to the brachial plexus service who had damage predominantly to the infraclavicular brachial plexus and its branches. Patients fell into four categories: 1. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation (46 cases); 2. ‘Occult’ shoulder dislocation or scapular fracture (17 cases); 3. Humeral neck fracture (11 cases); 4. Arm hyperextension (9 cases). The axillary (38/46) and ulnar (36/46) nerves were most commonly injured as a result of glenohumeral dislocation. The axillary nerve was ruptured in only 2 patients who had suffered high energy trauma. Ulnar nerve recovery was often incomplete. ‘Occult’ dislocation refers to patients who had no recorded shoulder dislocation but the history was suggestive that dislocation had occurred with spontaneous reduction. These patients and those with scapular fractures had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those with known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in 11 of 17 cases. In cases of humeral neck fracture, nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral shaft. Surgery was performed in 7 cases to reduce and fix the fracture. Arm hyperextension cases were characterised by injury to the musculocutaneous nerve, with the nerve being ruptured in 8 of 9. Five had humeral shaft fracture or elbow dislocation. There was variable involvement of the median and radial nerves, with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Most cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injury associated with shoulder dislocation can be managed without operation. Early nerve exploration and repair should be considered for:. Axillary nerve palsy without recorded shoulder dislocation or in association with fracture of the scapula. Musculocutaneous nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation is necessary for nerve injury resulting from fracture of the humeral neck to relieve ongoing pressure on the nerves

In this study we reviewed all Total Elbow Replacements (TER) done in our hospital over eight years period (1997 – 2005), 21 patients (16 females, 5 males) were available for follow up and four were lost (two died and two moved out of the region) with average age of 65 years (range 44 – 77), all procedures were done by two upper limb surgeons (CHB & RGW). 16 patients (14 females, 2 males) had the procedure for Rheumatoid Arthritis and 5 patients (3 males, 2 females) undergone the procedure for post-traumatic arthritis. The average follow up was 61 months (range 12 – 120 months), the Mayo Clinic performance index, the DASH scores and activities of daily living (adopted from Secec Elbow Score) assessment tools were used. In addition, all patients were assessed for loosening using standard AP and lateral radiographs. Sixteen patients had Souter-Starthclyde prosthesis whilst three had Kudo and two had Conrad-Moorey prosthesis. All procedures were done through dorsal approach and all were cemented, the ulnar nerve was not transposed in any of the cases. The average elbow extension lag was 27 degrees (range 15 – 35) with flexion up to 130 degrees (range 110 – 140). Supination was 65 degrees (range 15 – 90) and pronation was 77 (range 55 – 90). The average DASH score was 51.3 (range 19 – 95), the Mayo elbow score was 82 (range 55 – 100) and the average Activities of daily living Secec Score was 17 (range 10 – 20). There were four complications, three ulnar nerve paresis which recovered and one wound complication which needed a flap cover. Two needed revision surgery, one for a periprosthetic fracture and one for loosening. Two patients showed radiological signs of loosening but were asymptomatic. The survival rate with revision as the end point is 95% for aseptic loosening and 90% for any other reason. Our study proves TER has good medium term results with good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction rate

In this study we reviewed all Total Elbow Replacements (TER) done in our hospital over eight years period (1997 – 2005), 21 patients (16 females, 5 males) were available for follow up and four were lost (two died and two moved out of the region) with average age of 65 years (range 44 – 77), all procedures were done by two upper limb surgeons (CHB & RGW). 16 patients (14 females, 2 males) had the procedure for Rheumatoid Arthritis and 5 patients (3 males, 2 females) undergone the procedure for post-traumatic arthritis. The average follow up was 61 months (range 12 – 120 months), the Mayo Clinic performance index, the DASH scores and activities of daily living (adopted from Secec Elbow Score) assessment tools were used. In addition, all patients were assessed for loosening using standard AP and lateral radiographs. Sixteen patients had Souter-Starthclyde prosthesis whilst three had Kudo and two had Conrad-Moorey prosthesis. All procedures were done through dorsal approach and all were cemented, the ulnar nerve was not transposed in any of the cases. The average elbow extension lag was 27 degrees (range 15 – 35) with flexion up to 130 degrees (range 110 – 140). Supination was 65 degrees (range 15 – 90) and pronation was 77 (range 55 – 90). The average DASH score was 51.3 (range 19 – 95), the Mayo elbow score was 82 (range 55 – 100) and the average Activities of daily living Secec Score was 17 (range 10 – 20). There were four complications, three ulnar nerve paresis which recovered and one wound complication which needed a flap cover. Two needed revision surgery, one for a periprosthetic fracture and one for loosening. Two patients showed radiological signs of loosening but were asymptomatic. The survival rate with revision as the end point is 95% for aseptic loosening and 90% for any other reason. Our study proves TER has good medium term results with good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction rate

The treatment for Humeral Supracondylar fractures in children is percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires using a unilateral or crossed wire configuration. Capitellar entry point with divergent wires is thought crucial in the lateral entry approach. Crossed wire configuration carries a risk of Ulnar nerve injury. Our department had recorded a number of failures and this required review. A search was conducted for children with this injury and surgical fixation. A two year time frame was allocated to allow for adequate numbers. The hospitals radiography viewing system and patient notes were utilized to gather required information. 30 patients from 2–14 years all underwent surgery on the day of admission or the following day. 18 had sustained Gartland grade 3 or 4 injuries. Unilateral configuration was used in 10 cases; a loss of reduction was noted in 5 of these with one case requiring reoperation. Crossed wires were used in 20 cases with a loss of reduction in 1. Crossed wire configuration provides a more reliable fixation with a lower chance or re-operation. Our DGH policy now advises the use of this configuration. A small “mini-open” ulnar approach is utilized with visualization and protection of the nerve

Supra-condylar humerus fractures (SCHF) are amongst the most common fractures requiring surgical stabilisation in the pediatric age group (1). Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires (KW) is currently the standard of care (2). The number of KW used and their configuration has been the subject of much research (3, 4). The failure modes leading to loss of fracture reduction are not clear and have not been quantified. The aim of this study is to compare the mechanical stability of the opt-used configurations for various loading modes and contact interactions at the KW/bone interface. A Gartland type-III SCHF was introduced to a fourth generation composite saw bone (Sawbones®, Vashon, Washington, USA). The model was CT scanned with a slice spacing of 0.5mm and pixel size 0.3×0.3mm. The CT data set was imported into AmiraDev (AmiraDev 5.2 Visage Imaging, Inc). A uniaxial mechanical test was conducted in order to measure the KW pullout forces from the distal humerus. A model of the fractured humerus was constructed with the following steps: 1) manual segmentation; 2) surface generation of each fragment, and; 3) automatic volumetric grid generation for each fragment. The fracture was then virtually reduced and KWs were placed at the desired configurations (Fig 1a-b). For each configuration, a separate model was generated. Material properties were assigned to the bone-model elements according to the manufacturer's data sheet; Young's modulus E = 16GPa and E = 150MPa for the cortical and cancellous bone respectively. The KW were assigned a Young's modulus of 200GPa. Each of the models created in Amira was imported to a finite element application (Abaqus 6.9, DS-Simula) for structural analysis. For each of KW configuration four different torque forces load types were simulated (Fig 1c left): 1) a clockwise and counterclockwise torque with a magnitude of 1.5 NM (Newton/Meters); 2) a translational force with a magnitude of 30 N (Newtons) in the direction of the humerus shaft, and; 3) a shear force with a magnitude of 30 N in the direction parallel to the fracture plane. The results were normalised such that the maximum displacement for the crossed pin configuration with a coefficient of friction equal to zero (μ = 0) was used as unity for each load configuration. Similarly, for each of KW configuration four different translational forces load types were simulated (Fig 1c right): 1) a clockwise and counter clock-wise torque with a magnitude of 1.5 NM (Newton/Meters); 2) a translational force with a magnitude of 30N in the direction of the humerus shaft, and; 3) a shear force with a magnitude of 30N in the direction parallel to the fracture plane. The results were normalised as described above. Results. Torque forces: the crossed configuration was found to be almost independent of the bone-implant friction and was symmetric in terms of direction of the applied torque. The diverging configuration exhibited larger dependency on the bone-implant interface. This is especially noticed as the coefficient of friction (COF) reduced to values below μ = 0.2. Translational forces: the diverging configuration exhibited high sensitivity to reduction of the COF μ = 0. Displacement of the fracture for μ = 0 was substantially larger for the diverging configuration relative to the crossed configuration: 13.5 times and 19 times for the transverse and pullout directions, respectively. As the COF increased to values above μ = 0.5, both fixation configurations performed in a similar manner. Stabilisation of SCHF has been the subject of numerous studies. Relative stability of the different configurations and the risk for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury has been in the center of the debate. Crossed KW configuration was shown in some clinical studies to be more stable than two lateral KW while others demonstrated no significant difference in stability. As ulnar nerve injury may occur in up to 15.4% of surgeries even if insertion of a medial KW is performed under direct vision, utilisation of two lateral KW configurations offers the advantage of reducing this risk significantly. The main finding of this study is that for a COF exceeding a threshold level (µ = 0.2) the crossed KW configuration did not offer any mechanical advantage over the diverging lateral KW configuration. However, for very low COF values (µ<0.2) the crossed configuration exhibited improved performance when compared with divergent lateral KW (figure 1d). The data demonstrates that the KW-bone bonding has a profound effect on the stability of the fixated bone construct. This is mostly evident when distraction forces are applied but also occurs, to a lesser degree, with rotational or translational forces. This may be a clinically important consideration in the rare SCHF in children with abnormal bones and possibly more commonly, when the KW-bone bonding was compromised after multiple attempts of passing the KW through the same entry point. We have conducted a combined in-vitro mechanical test and finite element-based simulations of a fixated SCHF with different KW configurations, under various friction conditions. Under normal bone-implant interface bonding conditions, the two diverging lateral KW configuration offers adequate mechanical stability and may be the preferred choice of SCHF fixation

Aim. Infections after total elbow arthroplasty are more frequent than after other joint arthroplasties. Therapeutic management varies depending of the patient status, the time of diagnosis of the infection, the status of the implant as well as the remaining bone stock around the implants. Method. Between 1997 and 2017, 180 total elbow arthroplasties were performed in our department. Eleven (6%) sustained a deep infection and were revised. Infection occurred after prosthesis of first intention in 4 and after a revision procedure in 7. Etiologies were: rheumatoid arthritis in 6, trauma sequela in 4 and osteosarcoma in 1. There were 7 women and 4 men of 59 years on average (22–87). Delay between the prosthesis and the diagnosis of infection was 66 months (0.5–300). The infection was stated as acute (<3week) in one, subacute (between 3 week and 3 months) in 1, and chronic (>3 months) in 9. Isolated bacteria were: Staphylococcus (10), Streptococcus (1), P. acnes (1), and Proteus mirabilis (1). Infection were poly microbial in 2 cases. A simple lavage with debridement was performed in 3 cases (Group 1), a 2-stage revision in 4 (Group 2), and a definitive removal of the prosthesis in 4 (Group 3). Adapted antibiotics were prescribed for all patients during at least 6 weeks. Results. All patients were reviewed with 59 months average follow-up. Eight patients were cured of their infection thanks to the initial therapeutic strategy. For 2 patients of Group 2, infection reccurrency required a new surgical procedure with one simple lavage/debridement for one, and 3 lavage/debridement for the other making it possible to cure the infection. For one patient of Group 1, a failure of lavage/debridement required removal of the implants. The MEPS reached 72 points: 67 points for patients of Group 1, 76 points for patients of Group 2, and 74 points for patients of Group 3. Complication rate was 36% (4): 2 ulnar nerve impairment with dysesthesia, one radial nerve palsy, and one humeral stem loosening. Conclusions. An adapted therapeutic strategy can allow suppression of the responsible bacteria after infection of total elbow arthroplasty. Sometimes, several procedures are necessary to obtain the cure. Better functional results were obtained when the prosthesis could be retained or replaced, but satisfactory results could also be obtained after resection arthroplasty when the humeral columns have been preserved to stabilize the joint

Aim:. To investigate the clinical outcomes of elbows with post-traumatic stiffness treated by open surgical release. Methods:. A retrospective review was completed on thirty-five consecutively managed patients who underwent an open elbow release for post-traumatic stiffness between 2007 and 2012. Pre-operative and post-operative range of motion (ROM), pain scores and functional outcomes were recorded. Results:. Mean follow-up was 31 months (6–84). The cohort consisted of 20 male and 15 female patients with an average age at time of surgery of 34 years (17–59). The interval from injury to time of release was 26 months (6–180). An improvement in mean ROM from 49° (0°–105°) to 102° (55°–150°) was obtained. The improvement in ROM in patients with pre-operative heterotopic bone was 61° compared to 45° in patients without heterotopic bone. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 44 pre-operatively to 82 at most recent follow-up. Mean VAS scores improved from 5.9 pre-operatively to 2.8 at most recent follow-up. Patients rated the affected elbow a mean of 73% as compared to the contralateral/normal side (50–100%). Apart from a 10% incidence of transient ulnar nerve neurapraxia in patients who had a medial or combined approach, complication rates and functional outcomes were comparable between medial, lateral and combined approaches. Conclusion:. Open release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness results in satisfactory functional outcomes in the majority of cases, with no significant differences between medial, lateral or combined approaches

Background. The optimal treatment for symptomatic elbow osteoarthritis remains debatable especially in patients still involved in heavy manual work. The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi (OK) procedure has been used when simple measures fail. The aim of this study is to analyse the results of the OK procedure in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis. Methods. Twenty-two patients were included in the study. The male:female ratio was 18:4. The mean age was 60 years with mean follow-up of 38 months (24–60 months). 17 were manual workers, 3 involved in sports activities and 2 non-manual workers. All patients were assessed using Mayo Elbow Performance Index Score system. Preoperative radiological assessment showed osteophytes around olecranon and coronoid process and joint space narrowing in radio-humeral articulationin all cases. Results. There was a significant improvement (p<0.05) in movement in the flexion-extension axis from 78.2° to 107.3°. There was a significant reduction in pain post-operatively (p<0.001). Mean MEPI score improved from 50 to 87.4 post surgery which was significant (p<0.05). One patient had ulnar nerve palsy which resolved in six months with conservative management. The results were excellent in six patients (27%), good in fifteen (68%), fair in one (5%) and one (5%) had poor result. Discussion and conclusion. The present study indicates that the OK procedure provides significant pain relief and a functionally useful range of movement of more than 100°. The procedure can be used in high demand patients, wherein total elbow replacement is not indicated. It significantly reduces the disability in patients with significant elbow arthritis

Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) is a procedure to treat a number of conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), post-traumatic arthritis, and osteoarthritis. To date, there has been minimal literature published on the Latitude since its release in 2001. There is one study reporting outcomes from the Latitude, a German study published in 2010. The purpose of this study was to analyse outcomes from primary Latitude TEAs. We performed a retrospective case series of 23 TEAs performed on 20 patients. 6 patients required revision surgery and were not included in the analysis. One patient was lost to follow up, resulting in 17 patients included for ROM analysis. All patients received Latitude TEA through a posterior approach and underwent a standard rehab protocol. 11 Patients were recalled at least two years post-op and were administered DASH and MAYO questionnaires. Complications such as triceps insufficiency, ulnar nerve dysfunction, infection, and aseptic loosening were recorded. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test in STATA. Immediate post-op radiographs and patients most recent radiographs were analysed by a blinded upper-extremity surgeon not involved in the initial operation and analysed for loosening and implant malpostioning. Mean follow up was 4.8 years (range 2.6–7.5 years). Analysis of 17 TEAs in 16 patients revealed no difference in pre-operative ROM and post-operative ROM for flexion (121°±20 vs 129°±16, p=0.13) extension (40°±27 vs 27°±15, p=0.19), pronation (73°±13 vs 75°±24, p=0.55) or supination (64°±22 vs 68°±14, p=0.52). Patients who underwent TEA for RA had a significant improvement in flexion (121°±15 vs 135°±10, p<0.02). There was a statistically significant improvement in flexion-extension arc post-operatively (101°±28) compared to pre-operative scores (83±23 degrees, p<0.02). DASH and MAYO scores were calculated from 11elbows in 11 non-revision patients able to return for examination. The average MAYO score was 87.9 with nine patients in the “excellent” category, two patients in the “good” category, one patient in the “fair” category, and one in the “poor” category. The average DASH score was 32.9. Two patients underwent revision for periprosthetic fractures, two patients underwent revision for infection, one underwent revision for aseptic loosening and two for radial head dissociation (rate of 30%). This is one of the first studies examining the outcomes of the Latitude TEA. This retrospective case series demonstrates that the Latitude TEA has promising outcomes with respect to improving patient pain and functioning as assessed by the MAYO. Treatment using the Latitude TEA results in favorable functional outcomes for a majority of patients and offers an improvement in flexion-extension arc. Furthermore, our results are comparable to the MAYO scores reported by other studies analysing different prosthesis designs. The complication rate in our series was comparable to published rates of 20–40%

Adequate exposure is a prerequisite for treatment of distal humeral fractures. In this study, we compared the clinico-radiological and functional outcome of TRAP approach with that of olecranon osteotomy for distal humerus fractures. 27 patients with distal humerus fractures were randomized into 2 groups: Group 1 (n=14, TRAP approach), Group 2 (n=13, Olecranon osteotomy). All patients were operated with bi-columnar fixation. All patients were mobilized from day 2. Follow-up evaluation was done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. All patients achieved union. The mean surgical time was higher in group 1 (120 min) as compared to group 2 (100 min). The final ROM was higher in group 1 (1160) as compared to group 2 (850). Two patients in group 2 needed posterior release. 5 patients in group 2 had hardware complications related to olecranon osteotomy and needed removal. Two patients in Group 1 had transient ulnar nerve paraesthesias. There was no difference in triceps power in both groups. Our results demonstrate that TRAP approach is extensile and safe enough in treating these complex fractures with better final ROM and fewer complications

Aim. To compare radiological and clinical outcomes between triceps-detaching and triceps-sparing approaches in total elbow arthroplasty, with specific focus on cementing technique and post-operative range of motion. Methods. A retrospective review was completed of medical records and radiographs of 56 consecutively managed patients who underwent a primary total elbow arthroplasty between 2000 and 2012 at a tertiary hospital. Rheumatoid Arthritis was the predominant pathology (47/56). Data analysed included patient demographics, range of motion pre-operatively and at various stages post-operatively, approach utilized, operative time and complications. Cementing technique was graded as adequate, marginal or inadequate according to Morrey's criteria. Results. 12 patients were lost to follow-up or had incomplete records, leaving 44 patients for analysis. 15 patients had a triceps-sparing approach, and 29 had a variation of a triceps-detaching approach. Average follow-up was 56.1 months. Flexion range of motion in the triceps-sparing group improved from 25°–122° (±19.6°) pre-op to 10°–140° (±22.5°) at final follow-up, and in the triceps-detaching group from 41°–104° (± 22.2°) pre-op to 27°–129° (±35.0°) at final follow-up. Tourniquet time averaged 85.4 (±17.0) minutes for the triceps-sparing group and 96.1 (±22.6) minutes for the triceps-detaching group. The complication rate in the triceps-sparing group was 13.3%, and included one olecranon fracture and one case of superficial wound sepsis. The complication rate for the triceps-detaching group was 24.1%, and included one patient with persistent ulnar nerve symptoms requiring transposition, one medial condyle fracture and five triceps ruptures. Three patients who had attempted repairs of the rupture developed deep infections requiring multiple further surgeries. Cementing technique was adequate in 91.7% in the triceps-sparing group and in 70.6% in the triceps-detaching group and marginal in the remainder of the cohort. Conclusion. A triceps-sparing approach results in a predictable improvement in range of motion with no compromise of the cement mantle. NO DISCLOSURES