We have reviewed 26 patients treated by trapezius transfer for deltoid paralysis due to brachial plexus injury or old poliomyelitis. We assessed the power of shoulder abduction and the tendency for subluxation. There were good results in 16 patients (60%); five were fair and five poor. Trapezius transfer appears to give reasonable results in the salvage of abductor paralysis of the shoulder

Introduction. Treatment strategies for irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears (MRCTs) are debatable, especially for younger, active patients. Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) acts as a static stabilizer, while Lower Trapezius Transfer (LTT) serves as a dynamic stabilizer. This study compares the biomechanical effectiveness of SCR and LTT, hypothesizing that their combination will enhance shoulder kinematics. Methods. Eight human shoulders from donors aged 55-75 (mean = 63.75 years), balanced for gender, averaging 219.5 lbs, were used. Rotator cuff and deltoid tendons were connected to force sensors through a pulley system, with the deltoid linked to a servohydraulic motor for dynamic force measurement. Results. From intact to MRCT, deltoid force was reduced by 28% (p = 0.023). LTT increased deltoid force by 27.25 (p = 0.166). SCR decreased deltoid force by 34% (p = 0.208). Combining LTT with SCR increased deltoid force by 32.57% compared to SCR (p = 0.023) and decreased it by 13.6% compared to LTT alone (p = 0.017). Combined LTT and SCR reduced deltoid force by 20.9% from the control (p = 0.001). Subacromial contact pressure rose by 15% in MRCT over intact, but LTT decreased it by 7.6%, achieving nearly 50% correction. SCR increased subacromial space volume, raising pressure by 6.5%. The humeral head translation (HHT) increases with MRCT, reaching 3.33 mm (SD = 0.95) at 0 degrees, compared to 2.24 mm (SD = 0.78) in the intact. LTT and the combined LTT + SCR significantly reduce HHT, with combined LTT + SCR achieving HHT of 2.24 mm (SD = 0.63) at 0 degrees, comparable to the control. Conclusion. Notable changes in deltoid force were observed. LTT outperformed the combined SCR and LTT in reducing deltoid force and subacromial peak pressure. Both SCR and LTT corrected HTT, with LTT being more effective. However, combining SCR and LTT optimally corrected HHT

Most brachial plexus palsies are due to trauma, often resulting from motorcycle accidents. When nerve repair and physiotherapy are unsuccessful, muscle transfer may be considered. Paralysis of the deltoid and supraspinatus muscles can be addressed by transfer of the trapezius. Between March 1994 and June 1997 we treated 38 patients with brachial plexus palsy by trapezius transfer and reviewed 31 of these (7 women, 24 men) after a mean follow-up of 23.8 months (12 to 39), reporting the clinical and radiological results and subjective assessment. The mean age of the patients was 29 years (18 to 46). The operations had been performed according to the method of Saha described in 1967, involving transfer of the acromion with the insertion of the trapezius to the proximal humerus, and immobilisation in an abduction support for six weeks. Rehabilitation started on the first postoperative day with active exercises for the elbow, hand and fingers, and electrical stimulation of the transferred trapezius. All 31 patients had improved function with a decrease in multidirectional instability of the shoulder. The average increase in active abduction was from 7.3° (0 to 45) to 39° (25 to 80) at the latest review. The mean forward flexion increased from 20° (0 to 85) to 44° (20 to 90). Twenty-nine of the 31 were satisfied with the improvement in stability and function. Trapezius transfer for brachial plexus palsy involving the shoulder improves function and stability with clear subjective benefits

Between March 1994 and June 2003, 80 patients with brachial plexus palsy underwent a trapezius transfer. There were 11 women and 69 men with a mean age of 31 years (18 to 69). Before operation a full evaluation of muscle function in the affected arm was carried out. A completely flail arm was found in 37 patients (46%). Some peripheral function in the elbow and hand was seen in 43 (54%). No patient had full active movement of the elbow in combination with adequate function of the hand. Patients were followed up for a mean of 2.4 years (0.8 to 8). We performed the operations according to Saha’s technique, with a modification in the last 22 cases. We demonstrated a difference in the results according to the pre-operative status of the muscles and the operative technique.

The transfer resulted in an increase of function in all patients and in 74 (95%) a decrease in multidirectional instability of the shoulder. The mean increase in active abduction was from 6° (0 to 45) to 34° (5 to 90) at the last review. The mean forward flexion increased from 12° (0 to 85) to 30° (5 to 90).

Abduction (41°) and especially forward flexion (43°) were greater when some residual function of the pectoralis major remained (n = 32). The best results were achieved in those patients with most pre-operative power of the biceps, coracobrachialis and triceps muscles (n = 7), with a mean of 42° of abduction and 56° of forward flexion. Active abduction (28°) and forward flexion (19°) were much less in completely flail shoulders (n = 34).

Comparison of the 19 patients with the Saha technique and the 15 with the modified procedure, all with complete paralysis, showed the latter operation to be superior in improving shoulder stability. In all cases a decrease in instability was achieved and inferior subluxation was abolished.

The results after trapezius transfer depend on the pre-operative pattern of paralysis and the operative technique. Better results can be achieved in patients who have some function of the biceps, coracobrachialis, pectoralis major and triceps muscles compared with those who have a complete palsy. A simple modification of the operation ensures a decrease in joint instability and an increase in function.

Introduction

Supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears (Massive Rotator Cuff Tear- MRCT) cause compensatory activation of the teres minor (TM) and subscapularis (SubS) to maintain humeral head alignment. This study measures force changes in TM and SubS using a dynamic shoulder testing setup. We hypothesize that combining superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) and lower trapezius tendon (LTT) transfer will correct rotator cuff forces.

Background:

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical effects of the trapezius transfer and the latissimus dorsi transfer in a cadaveric model of a massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear.

A total of 35 children with Erb’s palsy and shoulder abduction of < 90° underwent transfer of teres major. In 18 cases (group 1) a trapezius transfer was added (combined procedure). In 17 cases (group 2) teres major transfer was carried out in isolation (single procedure). The mean gain in abduction was 67.2° (60° to 80°) in group 1 and 37.6° (20° to 70°) in group 2, which reached statistical significance (p < 0.001).

Group 2 was further divided into those who had deltoid power of < M3 (group 2a) and those with deltoid power ≥ M3 (group 2b). The difference in improvement of abduction between groups 2a and group 2b was statistically significant (p < 0.001) but the difference between group 2b and group 1 was not (p = 0.07).

We recommend the following protocol of management: in children with abduction ≥ 90° a single procedure is indicated. In children with abduction < 90°: a combined procedure is indicated if deltoid power is < M3 and a single procedure is indicated if deltoid power is ≥ M3. If no satisfactory improvement is achieved, the trapezius can be transferred at a later stage.

Rotator cuff tears are the most common cause of shoulder disability, affecting 10% of the population under 60 and 40% of those aged 70 and above. Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears account for 30% of all tears and their management continues to be an orthopaedic challenge. Traditional surgical techniques, that is, tendon transfers are performed to restore shoulder motion, however, they result in varying outcomes of stability and complications. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is a novel technique that has shown promise in restoring shoulder function, albeit in limited studies. To date, there has been no biomechanical comparison between these techniques. This study aims to compare three surgical techniques (SCR, latissimus dorsi tendon transfer and lower trapezius tendon transfer) for irreparable rotator cuff tears with respect to intact cuff control using a clinically relevant biomechanical outcome of rotational motion. Eight fresh-frozen shoulder specimens with intact rotator cuffs were tested. After dissection of subcutaneous tissue and muscles, each specimen was mounted on a custom shoulder testing apparatus and physiologic loads were applied using a pulley setup. Under 2.2 Nm torque loading maximum internal and external rotation was measured at 0 and 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction. Repeat testing was conducted after the creation of the cuff tear and subsequent to the three repair techniques. Repeated measures analysis with paired t-test comparisons using Sidak correction was performed to compare the rotational range of motion following each repair technique with respect to each specimen's intact control. P-values of 0.05 were considered significant. At 0° abduction, internal rotation increased after the tear (intact: 39.6 ± 13.6° vs. tear: 80.5 ± 47.7°, p=0.019). Internal rotation was higher following SCR (52.7 ± 12.9°, intact - SCR 95% CI: −25.28°,-0.95°, p=0.034), trapezius transfer (74.2 ± 25.3°, intact – trapezius transfer: 95% CI: −71.1°, 1.81°, p=0.064), and latissimus transfer (83.5 ± 52.1°, intact – latissimus transfer: 95% CI: −118.3°, 30.5°, p=0.400) than in intact controls. However, internal rotation post SCR yielded the narrowest estimate range close to intact controls. At 60° abduction, internal rotation increased after the tear (intact: 38.7 ± 14.4° vs. tear: 49.5 ± 13°, p=0.005). Internal rotation post SCR did not differ significantly from intact controls (SCR: 49.3 ± 10.1°, intact – SCR: 95% CI: −28°, 6.91°, p=0.38). Trapezius transfer showed a trend toward significantly higher internal rotation (65.7 ± 21.1°, intact – trapezius transfer: 95% CI: −55.7°, 1.7°, p=0.067), while latissimus transfer yielded widely variable rotation angle (65.7 ± 38°, intact – latissimus transfer: 95% CI: −85.9°, 31.9°, p=0.68). There were no significant differences in external rotation for any technique at 0° or 60° abduction. Preliminary evaluation in this cadaveric biomechanical study provides positive evidence in support of use of SCR as a less morbid surgical option than tendon transfers. The cadaveric nature of this study limits the understanding of the motion to post-operative timepoint and the results herein are relevant for otherwise normal shoulders only. Further clinical evaluation is warranted to understand the long-term outcomes related to shoulder function and stability post SCR

Shoulder arthrodesis is often used to treat flail shoulder after a brachial plexus injury, but has a high complication rate and entails loss of passive mobility. We have reviewed 27 patients with brachial plexus injury treated by transfer of the trapezius to the proximal humerus at an average time from injury of 31.3 months. Pre-operatively, all 27 shoulders were subluxated, with an average abduction of 3.5 degrees. Postoperatively, shoulder abduction averaged 45.4 degrees, and subluxation was abolished. All patients were satisfied with their improvement in function. Trapezius transfer is recommended as a simple procedure that requires only a brief period in hospital, allows early rehabilitation, and gives a satisfactory outcome, while retaining passive mobility of the shoulder