Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

COMPARATIVE BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SUPERIOR CAPSULAR RECONSTRUCTION (SCR) AND LOWER TRAPEZIUS TRANSFER (LTT) IN TREATING MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 32nd Annual Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 September 2024.



Abstract

Introduction

Treatment strategies for irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears (MRCTs) are debatable, especially for younger, active patients. Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) acts as a static stabilizer, while Lower Trapezius Transfer (LTT) serves as a dynamic stabilizer. This study compares the biomechanical effectiveness of SCR and LTT, hypothesizing that their combination will enhance shoulder kinematics.

Methods

Eight human shoulders from donors aged 55-75 (mean = 63.75 years), balanced for gender, averaging 219.5 lbs, were used. Rotator cuff and deltoid tendons were connected to force sensors through a pulley system, with the deltoid linked to a servohydraulic motor for dynamic force measurement.

Results

From intact to MRCT, deltoid force was reduced by 28% (p = 0.023). LTT increased deltoid force by 27.25 (p = 0.166). SCR decreased deltoid force by 34% (p = 0.208). Combining LTT with SCR increased deltoid force by 32.57% compared to SCR (p = 0.023) and decreased it by 13.6% compared to LTT alone (p = 0.017). Combined LTT and SCR reduced deltoid force by 20.9% from the control (p = 0.001). Subacromial contact pressure rose by 15% in MRCT over intact, but LTT decreased it by 7.6%, achieving nearly 50% correction. SCR increased subacromial space volume, raising pressure by 6.5%. The humeral head translation (HHT) increases with MRCT, reaching 3.33 mm (SD = 0.95) at 0 degrees, compared to 2.24 mm (SD = 0.78) in the intact. LTT and the combined LTT + SCR significantly reduce HHT, with combined LTT + SCR achieving HHT of 2.24 mm (SD = 0.63) at 0 degrees, comparable to the control.

Conclusion

Notable changes in deltoid force were observed. LTT outperformed the combined SCR and LTT in reducing deltoid force and subacromial peak pressure. Both SCR and LTT corrected HTT, with LTT being more effective. However, combining SCR and LTT optimally corrected HHT.