Background. Phone based Physiotherapy is a topical area of investigation. Salisbury, (2013) states it may be as effective as usual care. It is also suggested that satisfaction is similar, but more specific attitudes have not been investigated. This study aims to retrospectively investigate the attitudes of PD vs usual care patients and to identify any differences in the attitudes of spine pain vs peripheral pain patients. Methods and Results. Questionnaires including 6 attitude questions (3 negatively, 3 positively worded) scored between 0–10 were completed by 197 physiotherapy patients discharged between 6 and 12 months previously. n=99 had received usual care, n=19 only PD care and n=79 both PD and usual care. N=61 had been treated for back or neck pain and n=136 had peripheral pain. Overall patients who had received some PD care were more likely to strongly agree (score 8–10) with the positive statements and strongly disagree (score 0–2) with the negative ones than patients who had not had some PD care. Spine patients who had never had PD were more likely to strongly agree with the negative statements than non-spines, but this was only the case with 1-in-3 negative statements in spine patients who had received PD. Compared to spine pain patients who had never had PD care, spine patients who had received PD were far more likely to strongly disagree with negative statements about PD than non-spine patients. Multiple other interesting trends exist. Conclusion. Spine pain patients' attitudes to PD care may differ from non-spine pain patients

To assess whether Patients who are clinically Obese are more likely to require further or revision Surgery following One-Level simple Microdiscectomy compared to Non-obese Patients. Retrospective, single centre and single Surgeon review of Patients' Clinical notes of consecutive Patients who underwent primary One-Level Microdiscectomy between December 2007 and July 2009. Background: Obesity in Surgery has become a topical subject given the increasing proportion of Surgical Patients being Obese. This study provides the largest single centre and single Surgeon comparative cohort. All Patients had undergone One-level simple Primary Microdiscectomy Surgery. Data from the Clinical notes included Patient Demographics, level and side of operation, Length of stay and Re-Operation details. A total number of 71 Patients were eligible for inclusion of which 38 were Female and 33 Male with an average age of 41 years. 25 Patients were Clinically Obese (35%). Average LOS was 1.1 days. 8% of the clinically Obese Patients required further Surgery compared to 8.7% in the Non-obese group. Revision surgery for recurrent discs and Surgery for dural tear repair were the main reasons for return to theatre. Revision rates were comparable between the two Patient groups. LOS was no different for Obese Patients. This study concludes that Obese Patients undergoing One-Level simple Microdiscectomy do not face a significantly higher risk of requiring Revision Surgery in the future

Aims

In a multicentre, randomised study of adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis, we investigated the effect of adding gelatine matrix with human thrombin to the standard surgical methods of controlling blood loss.

Aims

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of coccygectomy for patients with chronic coccydynia.