Background. Data on varus-valgus and rotational profiles can be obtained during navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Such intraoperative kinematic data might provide instructive clinical information for refinement of surgical techniques, as well as information on the anticipated postoperative clinical outcomes. However, few studies have compared intraoperative kinematics and pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes; therefore, the clinical implications of intraoperative kinematics remain unclear. In clinical practice, subjects with better femorotibial rotation in the flexed position often achieve favorable postoperative range of motion (ROM); however, no objective data have been reported to prove this clinical impression. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate the correlation between intraoperative rotation and pre- and postoperative flexion angles. Materials and Methods. Twenty-six patients with varus osteoarthritis undergoing navigated posterior-stabilized TKA (Triathlon, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) were enrolled in this study. An image-free navigation system (Stryker 4.0 image-free computer navigation system; Stryker) was used for the operation. Registration was performed after minimum soft tissue release and osteophyte removal. Then, maximum internal and external rotational stress was manually applied on the knee with maximum extension and 90° flexion by the same surgeon, and the rotational angles were recorded using the navigation system. After knee implantation, the same rotational stress was applied and the rotational angles were recorded again. In addition, ROM was measured before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. The correlation between the amount of pre- and postoperative
Introduction:. Proper rotational alignment of the tibial component is a critical factor in the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and misalignment has been implicated as a major contributing factor to several mechanisms of TKA failure. In this study we examine the relationship between bony and soft tissue tibial landmarks against the knee motion axis (plane that best approximates tibiofemoral motion through range of motion). Methods:. The kinematic motions of 16 fresh-frozen lower limb specimens were analyzed in simulated lunging and squatting. All the tendons of the quadriceps and hamstrings were independently loaded to simulate a lunging or squatting maneuver. All specimens underwent CT scan and the 3D position of the knee was virtually reconstructed. Ten anatomic axes were identified using both the intact tibia and the resected tibial surface. Two axes were normal vectors to either the medial-lateral plateau center or the posterior tibial surface. Seven axes were defined between the tibial tubercle (the most prominent point, center of the tubercle, or medial third of the tubercle) and soft tissue landmarks of the tibia (the medial insertion of the patellar tendon, the center of the PCL and ACL, and the tibial spines). The last axis was the Knee Motion Axis (KMA), which was defined as the longitudinal axis of the femur from 30 to 90 degrees of flexion. Results:. The closest approximation of the KMA was provided by the axis from the PCL to Medial Tibial Spine Axis, which was internally rotated 1.9 ± 7.6 degrees (Table – 1). The closest axis to the KMA in external rotation was the axis from the tibial plateau center to the medial third of the tibial tubercle, which was externally rotated 2.8 ± 4.3 degrees. The most precisely located constant axis was from the center of the tibia to the center of the tibial tubercle, which was externally rotated by 14.9 ± 3.7 degrees. Conclusions:. The line connecting the center of the PCL and the mid-point between the medial and lateral tibial spines was the closest to the functional
Purpose. We aimed to investigate whether the anterior superior iliac spine could provide consistent rotational landmark of the tibial component during mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using computed tomography (CT). Methods. During sagittal tibial resection, we utilized the ASIS as a rotational landmark. In 47 knees that underwent postoperative CT scans after medial UKA, the tibial component position was assessed by drawing a line tangential to the lateral wall of the
Purpose. Surgeons sometimes encounter moderate or severe varus deformed osteoarthritic cases in which medial substantial release including semimembranosus is compelled to appropriately balance soft tissues in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, medial stability after TKA is important for acquisition of proper knee kinematics to lead to medial pivot motion during knee flexion. The purpose of the present study is to prove the hypothesis that step by step medial release, especially semimembranosus release, reduces medial stability in cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Twenty CR TKAs were performed in patients with moderate varus-type osteoarthritis (10° < varus deformity <20°) using the tibia first technique guided by a navigation system (Orthopilot). During the process of medial release, knee kinematics including
The posterior drawer is a commonly used test to diagnose an isolated PCL injury and combined PCL and PLC injury. Our aim was to analyse the effect of tibial internal and external rotation during the posterior drawer in isolated PCL and combined PCL and PLC deficient cadaver knee. Ten fresh frozen and overnight-thawed cadaver knees with an average age of 76 years and without any signs of previous knee injury were used. A custom made wooden rig with electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure the knee kinematics. Each knee was tested with posterior and anterior drawer forces of 80N and posterior drawer with simultaneous external or internal rotational torque of 5Nm. Each knee was tested in intact condition, after PCL resection and after PLC (lateral collateral ligament and popliteus tendon) resection. Intact condition of each knees served as its own control. One-tailed paired student's t test with Bonferroni correction was used. The posterior tibial displacement in a PCL deficient knee when a simultaneous external rotation torque was applied during posterior drawer at 90° flexion was not significantly different from the posterior tibial displacement with 80N posterior drawer in intact knee (p=0.22). In a PCL deficient knee posterior tibial displacement with simultaneous internal rotation torque and posterior drawer at 90° flexion was not significantly different from tibial displacement with isolated posterior drawer. In PCL and PLC deficient knee at extension with simultaneous internal rotational torque and posterior drawer force the posterior tibial displacement was not significantly different from an isolated PCL deficient condition (p=0.54). We conclude that posterior drawer in an isolated PCL deficient knee could result in negative test if tibia is held in external rotation. During a recurvatum test for PCL and PLC deficient knee,
There are basically 4 ways advocated to determine the proper femoral component rotation during TKA: (1) The Trans-epicondylar Axis, (2) Perpendicular to the “Whiteside Line,” (3) Three to five degrees of external rotation off the posterior condyles, and (4) Rotation of the component to a point where there is a balanced symmetric flexion gap. This last method is the most logical and functionally, the most appropriate. Of interest is the fact that the other 3 methods often yield flexion gap symmetry, but the surgeon should not be wed to any one of these individual methods at the expense of an unbalanced knee in flexion. In correcting a varus knee, the knee is balanced first in extension by the appropriate medial release and then balanced in flexion by the appropriate rotation of the femoral component. In correcting a valgus knee, the knee can be balanced first in flexion by the femoral component rotation since balancing in extension almost never involves release of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) but rather release of the lateral retinaculum. If a rare LCL release is anticipated for extension balancing, then it would be performed prior to determining the femoral rotation since the release may open up the lateral flexion gap to a point where even more femoral component rotation is needed to close down that lateral gap. It is important to know and accept the fact that some knees will require internal rotation of the femoral component to yield flexion gap symmetry. The classic example of this is a knee that has previously undergone a valgus tibial osteotomy that has led to a valgus tibial joint line. In such a case, if any of the first 3 methods described above is utilised for femoral component rotation, it will lead to a knee that is very unbalanced in flexion being much tighter laterally than medially. A LCL release to open the lateral gap will be needed, increasing the complexity of the case. My experience has shown that intentional internal rotation of the femoral component when required is well-tolerated and rarely causes problems with patellar tracking. It is also of interest to note that mathematical calculations reveal that internally rotating a femoral component as much as 4 degrees will displace the trochlear groove no more that 2–3 mm (depending on the FC size), an amount easily compensated for by undersizing the patellar component and shifting it medially those few mm. There are basically 3 ways to determine the proper
The anterior curve of the tibial plateau cortex represents a realiable and reproducible landmark which may help aligning the tibial component with the femoral component and the extensor mechanism. Few studies analyzed the
Introduction. Tibial component malrotation is one of the commonest causes of pain and stiffness following total knee arthroplasties, however, the assessment of tibial component malrotation on imaging is not a clear-cut. Aim. The objective of this study was to assess
Background. Rotational alignment is important for the long-term success and good functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is the generally accepted landmark on the distal femur, a precise and easily identifiable anatomical landmark on the tibia has yet to be established. Our aim was to compare five axes on the proximal tibia in normal and osteoarthritic (OA) knees to determine the best landmark for determining rotational alignment during TKA. Methods. One hundred twenty patients with OA knees and 30 without knee OA were recruited for the study. Computed tomography (CT) images were obtained and converted through multiplanar reconstruction so the angles between the sTEA and the axes of the proximal tibia could be measured. Five AP axes were chosen: the line connecting the center of the posterior cruciate ligament(PCL) and the medial border of the patellar tendon at the cutting level of the tibia (PCL-PT), the line from the PCL to the medial border of the tibial tuberosity (PCL-TT1), the line from the PCL to the border of the medial third of the tibia (PCL-TT2), the line from the PCL to the apex of the tibia (PCL-TT3), and the AP axis of the tibial prosthesis along with the anterior cortex of the proximal tibia (anterior tibial curved cortex, ATCC). Results. In OA knees, the mean angles were less than those in normal knees for all 5 axes tested. In normal knees, the angle of the ATCC axis had the smallest mean value (1.6° ± 2.8°) and the narrowest range. In OA knees, the angle of the PCL-TT1 axis had the smallest mean value (0.3° ± 5.5°); however, the standard deviation (SD) and range were wider than that of the angle of the ATCC axis. The mean angle of the ATCC axis was larger (0.8° ± 2.7°) than the angle of the PCL-TT1 axis, but the difference was not statistically significant (P =0.461). The angle of the ATCC axis had the smallest SD and the narrowest range. Conclusion. In OA knees, the AP axis of the proximal tibia showed greater internal rotation compared with normal knees. In our study, the ATCC was found to be the most reliable and useful anatomical landmark for
Introduction. Post-operative clinical outcomes of TKA are dependent on a multitude of surgical and patient-specific factors. Malrotation of the femoral and/or tibial component is associated with pain, accelerated wear of the tibial insert, joint instability, and unfavorable patellar tracking and dislocation. Using the transepicondylar axis to guide implantation of the femoral component is considered to be an accurate anatomical reference and is widely used. However, no gold standard currently exists with respect to ensuring optimal rotation of the tibial tray. Literature has suggested that implantation methods, which reference the tibial tubercle, reduce positioning outliers with more consistency than other anatomical landmarks. Therefore, the purpose of this evaluation is to use data collected from intraoperative sensors to assess the true rotational accuracy of using the mid-medial third of the tibial tubercle in 98 TKAs. Methods. The data for this evaluation was retrieved from 98 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA from the same highly experienced surgeon. Femoral component rotation was verified in every case via the use of the Whiteside line, referencing the transepicondylar axis, and confirming appropriate patellar tracking.
Background. Accurate implant positioning is of supreme importance in total knee replacement (TKR). The rotational profile of the femoral and tibial components can affect outcomes, and the aim is to achieve coronal conformity with parallelism between the medio-lateral axes of the femur and tibia. Aims. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of implant rotation in total knee replacement. Methods. Intra-operatively, the trans-epicondylar axis of the femur (TEA) and Whiteside's line were used as the reference points, aiming to externally rotate the femoral component by 1 degree. The medial third of the tibial tuberosity was used as the anatomical reference point, aiming to reproduce the rotation of the native tibia. Pre-and post-operative CT scans were reviewed. The difference in femoral rotation was calculated by determining the femoral posterior condylar axis (PCA) of the native femur pre-operatively and the implant post-operatively.
Introduction. Kinematics post-TKA are complex; component alignment, component geometry and the patient specific musculoskeletal environment contribute towards the kinematic and kinetic outcomes of TKA.
Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs evolve as evidence accumulates on natural and prosthetic knee function. TKA designs based upon a medially conforming tibiofemoral articulation seek to reproduce essential aspects of normal knee stability and have enjoyed good clinical success and high patient satisfaction for over two decades. Fluoroscopic kinematic studies on several medially conforming knee designs show extremely stable knee function, but very small ranges of
Introduction. Mobility at insert-tray articulations in mobile bearing knee implant accommodates lower cross-shear at polyethylene (PE) insert, which in turn reduces wear and delamination as well as decreasing constraint forces at implant-bone interfaces. Though, clinical studies disclosed damage due to wear has occurred at these mobile bearing articulations. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the effect of second articulations bearing mobility and surface friction at insert-tray interfaces to stress states at tibial post during deep flexion motion. Method & Analysis. Figure 1 shows the 3-D computational aided drawing model and finite element model of implant used in this study. LS-DYNA software was employed to develop the dynamic model. Four conditions of models were tested including fixed bearing, as well as models with coefficients of friction of 0.04, 0.10 and 0.15 at tibial-tray interfaces to represent healthy and with debris appearance. A pair of nonlinear springs was positioned both anteriorly and posteriorly to represent ligamentous constraint. The dynamic model was developed to perform position driven motion from 0° to 135° of flexion angle with 0°, 10° and 15° of
Introduction. Instability, loosening, and patellofemoral pain belong to the main causes for revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Currently, the diagnostic pathway requires various diagnostic techniques such as x-rays, CT or SPECT-CT to reveal the original cause for the failed knee prosthesis, but increase radiation exposure and fail to show soft-tissue structures around TKA. There is a growing demand for a diagnostic tool that is able to simultaneously visualize soft tissue structures, bone, and TKA without radiation exposure. MRI is capable of visualising all the structures in the knee although it is still disturbed by susceptibility artefacts caused by the metal implant. Low-field MRI (0.25T) results in less metal artefacts and offers the ability to visualize the knee in weight-bearing condition. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the possibilities of low field MRI to image, the patellofemoral joint and the prosthesis to evaluate the knee joint in patients with and without complaints after TKA. Method. Ten patients, eight satisfied and two unsatisfied with their primary TKA, (NexGen posterior stabilized, BiometZimmer) were included. The patients were scanned in sagittal, coronal, and transversal direction on a low field MRI scanner (G-scan Brio, 0.25T, Esaote SpA, Italy) in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions with T1, T2 and PD-weighted metal artefact reducing sequences (TE/TR 12–72/1160–7060, slice thickness 4.0mm, FOV 260×260×120m. 3. , matrix size 224×216). Scans were analysed by two observers for:. - Patellofemoral joint: Caton-Descamps index and Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TT-TG) distance. - Prosthesis malalignment: femoral component rotation using the posterior condylar angle (PCA) and
PURPOSE. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful technique for treating painful osteoarthritic knees. However, the patients' satisfaction is not still comparable with total hip arthroplasty. Basically, the conditions with operated joints were anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knees, thus, the abnormal kinematics is one of the main reason for the patients' incomplete satisfaction. Bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA was established to reproduce both ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and expected to improve the abnormal kinematics. However, there were few reports to evaluate intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA using navigation system. Hence, the aim in this study is to reveal the intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA and compare the kinematics with conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA. Materials and Methods. Twenty five consecutive subjects (24 women, 1 men; average age, 77 years; age range, 58–85 years) with varus osteoarthritis undergoing navigated BCS TKA (Journey II, Smith&Nephew) were enrolled in this study. An image-free navigation system (Stryker 4.0 image-free computer navigation system; Stryker) was used for the operation. Registration was performed after minimum medial soft tissue release, ACL and PCL resection, and osteophyte removal. Then, kinematics including tibiofemoral rotational angles from maximum extension to maximum flexion were recorded. The measurements were performed again after implantation. We compared the kinematics with the kinematics of paired matched fifty subjects who underwent conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA (25 subjects with Triathlon, Stryker; 25 subjects with PERSONA, ZimmerBiomet) using navigation statistically. Results. Preoperative tibiofemoral rotational kinematics were almost the same between the three implants groups. Kinematics at post-implantation found that tibia was significantly internally rotated compared to the kinematics at registration in all three implants at maximum extension position (p<0.05), however the
Modern total knee replacements aim to reconstruct a physiological kinematic behaviour, and specifically femoral roll-back and automatic
Purpose. To investigate the tibiofemoral rotational profiles during surgery in navigated posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and investigated the effect on postoperative maximum flexion angles. Materials and Methods. At first, twenty-five consecutive subjects (24 women and 1 man; age: mean, 77 years; range, 58–85 years) with varus osteoarthritis treated with navigated PS TKA (Triathlon, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) were enrolled in this study. Kinematic parameters, including the tibiofemoral rotational angles from maximum extension to maximum flexion, were recorded thrice before and after PCL resections, and after implantation. The effect of PCL resection and component implantation on tibiofemoral rotational kinematics was statistically evaluated. Then, the effect of tibiofemoral rotational alignment changes on the postoperative maximum angles were retrospectively examined with 96 subjects (84 women, 12 men; average age, 76 years; age range, 56–88 years) who underwent primary TKA. Results. The tibiofemoral kinematics revealed a significant
Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has achieved excellent clinical outcomes and functional performances. However, there is a need for greater implant longevity and higher flexion by younger and Asian patients. We determined the relationship between mobility and stability of TKA product because they are essential for much further functional upgrading. This research evaluated the geometry characteristics of femorotibial surfaces quantitatively by measuring their force of constraint by computer simulation and mechanical test. Methods. We measured the force of constraint of femorotibial surfaces in order to evaluate the property of femorotibial surfaces. A total knee system was used for this evaluation, and has an asymmetrical joint surface, which restores the anatomical jointline in both sagittal and coronal planes, and is expected to permit normal kinematics, with cruciate-retaining fixed type. We performed computer simulation using finite element analyses (FEA) and mechanical tests using knee simulator to measure the force of constraint regarding anterior-posterior (AP) and internal-external (IE) rotational direction in extension position, 90-degree flexion and a maximum flexion of 140-degree. In the FEA, Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were set to 213 GPa and 0.3 for Co-Cr-Mo alloy as the femoral component, and 1 GPa and 0.3 for UHMWPe as the tibial insert, respectively. The force load to AP direction of tibial tray was measured when the femoral component moved plus or minus 10 millimeters. The moment load to IE rotational direction of tibial tray was measured when the femoral component moved plus or minus 20 degrees. The vertical load of 710 N was loaded on the femoral component during these measurements. Results. Regarding AP direction, the results of FEA showed 506 N (0-degree), 421 N (90-degree), and 389 N (140-degree) as the maximum load for anterior direction, and 152 N (0-degree), 166 N (90-degree), and 174 N (140-degree) for posterior direction. The results of mechanical tests showed 463 N (0-degree), 387 N (90-degree), and 332 N (140-degree) as the maximum load for anterior direction, and 108 N (0-degree), 121 N (90-degree), and 197 N (140-degree) for posterior direction [Fig. 1]. As the maximum moment load to IE rotational direction, the results of FEA showed 7.0 N-m (0-degree), 6.6 N-m (90-degree), and 5.5 N-m (140-degree) to
Total joint arthroplasty is an extremely high quality medical intervention with measured benefit to individual patients and society as a whole. However, nearly 20% of patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may report some level of dissatisfaction following surgery. Weight-bearing-in-flexion activities such as squatting and ascending/descending stairs are those activities with which patients most frequently report dissatisfaction. It is assumed that optimal functioning following TKA requires proper femoral and tibial implant positioning in all planes (sagittal, coronal, and axial), proper femoral-tibial balance in the coronal and sagittal plane and durable fixation irrespective of implant design and the manner in which the surgery is executed. Posterior stabilised (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) TKA designs are the most predominant implants utilised yet their kinematics are infrequently close to normal. In addition, there is little clinical evidence that one design is superior to another. Alternative designs such as bi-cruciate and medially stabilised designs are much less frequently used and much less frequently studied. However, in both cases, isolated centers with relatively small volumes of patients studied have reported outcomes superior to PS and CR designs depending on the metric assessed. With respect to kinematics, bi-cruciate and medially stabilised designs have displayed certain patterns of behavior that more closely mimic the native knee both in-vitro and in-vivo. Normal knee kinematics, as described by Freeman and Pinskerova, includes lateral sided femoral rollback with progressive knee flexion (alternatively thought of as internal