Cementless fixation in TKA has been inconsistently adopted since its early use but is increasing due to a number of factors, predominantly related to a demand for improved survivorship in younger patients. Modern biomaterials have demonstrated optimal bone ingrowth and have also contributed to a renewed confidence by surgeons to utilise cementless fixation in TKA. With a modern design and appropriate surgical technique, optimal mechanical stability of new designs have been demonstrated and can build upon the excellent long-term outcomes that have rivaled traditional cemented TKA. Paramount to obtaining successful long-term osseointegration and clinical survivorship with cementless fixation is an awareness of the past failure mechanisms to improve implant modern implant design, and should also guide meticulous surgical technique. A robust implant design with optimal surgical technique is critical to success when employing cementless fixation in TKA. The tried and true principles of sufficient mechanical stability to minimise micromotion of an osteoconductive implant surface with intimate contact against viable bone are essential to allow osseointegration and long-term survivorship. The surgical techniques and tips for “getting it right” include: 1.) Meticulous planar cuts - Prevention of saw blade deviation (particularly anterior femoral cortex and sclerotic medial tibial plateau), Appropriate tolerances in cutting guides (particularly 4-in-1 femoral cutting guide), Appropriate interference fit for tibial keel/stem, patella planar cut, Perfect planar cut on tibial surface confirmed with “4-corner test”. 2.) Implantation of components to maximise mechanical stability - Intimate implant contact with bone (minimizing gaps), Consider bone slurry to minimise gaps, Prevention of femoral component flexion with impaction, Ensure parallel position of tibial baseplate with tibial cut surface during impaction, Peripheral fixation on tibial baseplate, either screws or pegs, to provide supplemental fixation and stability in titanium tray designs

Purpose. Medial tibial condylar fractures (MTCFs) are rare but a serious complication after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The reasons for MTCFs was thought to be associated with the surgical procedures that are the halls for the guide pins, extended cut of the posterior tibial cortex, an incorrect positioning of the tibial keel groove, and an excessive force application when placing the tibial component. However, the relationship between MTCFs and the alignment of the tibial component has not been proven. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of the tibial component alignment to the MTCFs using the finite element method (FEM). Materials and Methods. We used three-dimensional (3D) image model of the tibia (Sawbones: Washington, US) on the FEM analysis software (ANSYS Design Space ver. 12, Tokyo, Japan). We measured the bone stresses in the 3D image model of the tibia at the site of the medial metaphyseal cortex and the anterior/posterior cortex. The tibial component was placed 0°, 3°varus, 3°valgus, 6°varus, and 6° valgus relative to the tibial anatomical axis in the coronal plane (Figure 1). In sagittal plane, tibial component was positioned 7° posterior inclination relative to the tibial anatomical axis. And, making an additional vertical groove at the posterior cortex by the extended sagittal saw cut of 2° and 10° posterior inclination, the impact of posterior cortical bone stress was evaluated (Figure 2). A load of 900 N was applied to the center of the tibial component parallel to the tibial axis, the maximum bone stress was subsequently calculated. Furthermore, to evaluate the stress distribution, we calculated the bone mass of the 3D bone model below the tibia component under the various alignment of the tibial component (Figure 3). Results. The bone stress at the medial metaphyseal cortex and the anterior cortex did not change depending on the alignment of the tibial component (Figure 4). When the tibial component was placed varus, the bone stress at the posteiror cortex decreased. By contrast, the valgus position of the tibial component increased the bone stress. An extended sagittal saw cut increased the bone stress depending on the depth of the groove. The bone mass of the tibia below the tibial component decreased as positioning the tibial component valgus. Conclusions. Surgeons should be aware of the potential pitfalls of valgus alignemnt of the tibial component and an extended sagittal saw cut, because this can lead to increased risk of the MTCFs

Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) have not been previously assessed in unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). We studied the early bone changes beneath the uncemented Oxford medial UKR. Our hypothesis was that this implant should decrease the shear stresses across the bone-implant interface and result in improved BMD and BMC beneath the tibial component. Using the Lunar iDXA and knee specific software we developed 7 regions of interest (ROI) in the proximal tibia and assessed 38 patients with an uncemented Oxford UKR at 2 years. We measured the replaced knee and contralateral unreplaced knee using the same ROI and compared the BMD and BMC. The initial precision study in 20 patients demonstrated high precision in all areas. There were 12 males and 16 females with an average age of 65.8 years (46–84 years). ROI 1 and 2 were beneath the tibial tray and had significantly less BMC (p=0.023 and 0.001) and BMD (p=0.012 and 0.002). ROI 3 was the lateral tibial plateau and this area also had significantly less BMC (p=0.007) and BMD (p=0.0001). ROI 4 and 5 immediately below the tibial keel had no significant change. These changes were independent of gender and age. These results were surprising in that the universal loss of BMC and BMD suggested that bone loading of the proximal tibia was not improved even after a UKR. The better BMD and BMC adjacent to the keel confirms other studies that show improved bone in-growth around keels and pegs in the uncemented tibial component. A prospective longitudinal study has been developed to compare BMD and BMC changes over time to see whether these changes are dynamic