Since osteoimmunology is gaining increasingly interest and evidence for involvement of complement in bone biology was found, the role of complement in bone biology and fracture healing was evaluated. After characterizing the bone phenotype, a fracture healing experiment with C3- and C5- deficient mice was performed. After osteotomy of the right femur and external fixation, healing was analyzed after 1, 3, 7 and 21 days. Bone characterization revealed a reduced number of osteoclasts in C5-deficient animals with a significantly reduced resorption activity. While bone mineral density was significantly higher in complement-deficient strains, stiffness was significantly reduced. After 21 days of fracture healing, C5-deficient animals showed reduced stiffness and a smaller callus volume compared to controls. Interestingly, C3- more than C5-deficient animals showed reduced bone formation. Altogether, bone phenotype of complement-deficient animals resembles a mild form of osteopetrosis. This might be due to the resorption defect seen in C5-deficient mice. A reason for the minor involvement of C3-deficient mice compared to the C5-deficient animals could be the cross-talk between the coagulation cascade with side activation of complement factor C5 by thrombin. These results indicate for the first time an essential role of complement in bone biology and fracture healing. Future studies should focus on the molecular basis of complement involvement and the osteoclastic resorption defect

Introduction. Interest in platelet-derived growth factors has been increasing as an adjunct in surgical techniques for tissue repair. Its use in ligament injuries repair has been studied mainly in animals. The authors intend to study growth factors influence in ACL repair using BTB graft. Material. 20 individuals underwent ACL rupture BTB arthroscopic repair, using Double Incision Mini-Invasive Technique. MRI (3-Tesla) images. GPSIII ® System to obtain Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) thrombin activated. Methods. Prospective study consisting of 2 groups of 10 patients each. Surgical technique, fixation method and postoperative protocol were the same. In the study group (SG-10 patients) graft was imbued with PRP and the remaing plasma was intra-articularly injected. The MRIs took place 6 weeks and 6 months after the procedure with and without gadolinium-DTPA enhancement. Evaluation was performed blindly by independent radiologists concerning femoral tunnel integration, sinovialization process and nonspecific synovitis. Clinical and functional status evaluation: IKDC. Statistical analysis in SPSS®. Results. Radiological evaluation was similar in both groups. In the Study Group at 6 weeks we verified less joint effusion and synovitis. At 6 months: no diference in integration in femoral tunnel, and in granulation tissue around the femoral tunnel in graft sinovialization. IKDC (mean ± SD) with PRP: pre-operative −45,66 ±6,98, post-operative −94,35 ±3,54 (Age-29 ± 10), without PRP: preoperative −48,02 ±12,68, post-operative −91,7 ±6,99 (Age −31 ±10). There are no statistical differences between the groups with and without PRP in clinical and functional assessments and MRI images. Discussion. The use of technology to accelerate and improve the processes of tissue repair and integration is of great interest in repairing the ACL. Studies in humans are rare, with low level of evidence and contradictory results. Although the limitations of this study, it seems to us that the use of growth factors has no advantages in the process of PT graft integration at 6 months. Conclusion. PRP doesn't seem to contribute to enhancement of the ligamentation process and articular rehabilitation when used as a step of BTB technique

Exsanguination is the second most common cause of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial, as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation. Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents or halts the progression of the trauma-induced coagulopathy, remains unknown. Although early and aggressive use of blood products in these patients appears to improve survival, over-enthusiastic resuscitative measures may not be the safest strategy.

This paper provides an overview of the classification of pelvic injuries and the current evidence on best-practice management of high-energy pelvic fractures, including resuscitation, transfusion of blood components, monitoring of coagulopathy, and procedural interventions including pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, external fixation and angiographic embolisation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1143–54.

Heterotopic ossification occurring after the use of commercially available bone morphogenetic proteins has not been widely reported. We describe four cases of heterotopic ossification in patients treated with either recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 or recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 7. We found that while some patients were asymptomatic, heterotopic ossification which had occurred around a joint often required operative excision with good results.

This paper reports the cost of outpatient venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following 388 injuries of the lower limb requiring immobilisation in our institution, from a total of 7408 new patients presenting between May and November 2011. Prophylaxis was by either self-administered subcutaneous dalteparin (n = 128) or oral dabigatran (n = 260). The mean duration of prophylaxis per patient was 46 days (6 to 168). The total cost (pay and non-pay) for prophylaxis with dalteparin was £107.54 and with dabigatran was £143.99. However, five patients in the dalteparin group required nurse administration (£23 per home visit), increasing the cost of dalteparin to £1142.54 per patient. The annual cost of VTE prophylaxis in a busy trauma clinic treating 12 700 new patients (2010/11), would be £92 526.33 in the context of an income for trauma of £1.82 million, which represents 5.3% of the outpatient tariff.

Outpatient prophylaxis in a busy trauma clinic is achievable and affordable in the context of the clinical and financial risks involved.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:673–7.