Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 36
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 6 | Pages 883 - 886
1 Aug 2003
Manoj Kumar RV Rajasekaran S

Ochronosis, the musculoskeletal manifestation of alkaptonuria, is known to lead to degenerative changes of the spine and weight-bearing joints. Symptoms related to degeneration of tendons or ligaments with spontaneous ruptures have not previously been reported. Three patients are described with four spontaneous ruptures of either the patellar tendon or tendo Achillis as the first symptom of alkaptonuria.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 20 - 20
1 May 2015
Lancaster S Ogunleye O Smith G Clark D Packham I
Full Access

Rupture of the pectoralis major (PM) tendon is a rare yet severe injury. Several techniques have been described for PM fixation including a transosseus technique, when cortical buttons are placed at the superior, middle and inferior PM tendon insertion positions. The concern with this technique is the risk that bicortical drilling poses to the axillary nerve as it courses posteriorly to the humerus.

This cadaveric study investigates the proximity of the posterior branch of the axillary nerve to the drill positions for transosseus PM tendon repair. Drills were placed through the humerus at the superior, middle and inferior insertions of the PM tendon and the distance between these positions and the axillary nerve, which had previously been marked, was measured using computed tomography (CT) imaging.

This investigation demonstrates that the superior border of PM tendon insertion is the fixation position that poses the highest risk of damage to the axillary nerve.

Caution should be used when performing bicortical drilling during cortical button PM tendon repair, especially when drilling at the superior border of the PM insertion. We describe ‘safe’ and ‘danger’ zones for transosseus drilling of the humerus reflecting the risk posed to the axillary nerve.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 64 - 64
23 Feb 2023
Faruque R
Full Access

Tendon injuries after distal radius fractures Introduction: Tendon injuries after distal radius fractures are a well-documented complication that can occur in fractures managed both operatively and non-operatively. The extensor tendons, in particular the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon, can be damaged and present late after initial management in a cast, or by long prominent screws that penetrate the dorsal cortex and cause attrition. Similarly, a prominent or distally placed volar plate can damage the flexor pollicis longus tendon (FPL). The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of tendon injuries associated with distal radius fractures. We conducted a single centre prospective observational study. Patients aged 18–99 who presented with a distal radius fracture between May 2018 to April 2020 were enrolled and followed-up for 24 months. Tendon injuries in the group were prospectively evaluated. Results: 199 patients with distal radius fractures were enrolled. 119 fractures (59.8%) had fixation and 80 (40.2%) were managed incast. In the non-operative group, 2 (2.5%) had EPL ruptures at approximately 4 weeks post injury. There were no extensor tendon ruptures in the operative group. In the operative group, there were 6 (5%) patients that required removal of metalware for FPL irritation. At the time of operation, there were no tendon ruptures noted. Within the operative group we evaluated plate prominence using a previously described classification (Soong et al.). 5 of the 6 patients (83%) with FPL irritation had Grade 3 prominence. The incidence of both flexor and extensor tendon injury in our cohort was 4%, extensor tendon rupture was 1% and flexor tendon rupture was avoided by early metalware removal. This study demonstrates tendon injuries are not uncommon after distal radius fractures, and close examination and follow-up are necessary to prevent eventual rupture. Plate prominence at the time of fixation should be minimised to reduce the risk of rupture


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 90 - 90
23 Feb 2023
Gill S Stella J Lowry N Kloot K Reade T Baker T Hayden G Ryan M Seward H Page RS
Full Access

Australian Football (AF) is a popular sport in Australia, with females now representing one-third of participants. Despite this, the injury profiles of females versus males in largely unknown. The current study investigated fractures, dislocations and tendon ruptures in females versus males presenting to emergency departments (ED) with an AF injury. All patients, regardless of age, presenting to one of 10 EDs in Victoria, Australia, with an AF injury were included. Data were prospectively collected over a 10-month period, coinciding with a complete AF season. Data were extracted from patient medical records regarding injury-type, body-part injured and treatments required. Female and male data were compared with chi-squared tests. Of the 1635 patients presenting with an AF injury, 595 (36.0%) had a fracture, dislocation or tendon rupture, of whom 85 (14.3%) were female and the average age was 20.5 years (SD 8.0). Fractures accounted for most injuries (n=478, 80.3% of patients had a fracture), followed by dislocations (n=118, 19.8%) and tendon ruptures (n=14, 2.4%). Upper limb fractures were more common than lower limb fractures (71.1% v 11.5% of fractures). Females were more likely to fracture their hands or fingers than males (45.7% v 34.3%). Males were more likely to fracture ribs (5.4% v 0%). Most fractures (91.2%) were managed in the ED, with the remainder being admitted for surgery (GAMP/ORIF). Males were more likely to be admitted for surgery than females (11.2% v 5.9%). Regarding dislocations (n=118), females were more likely to dislocate the patella (36.8% v 8.1% of dislocations). Only males sustained a tendon rupture (n=14): finger extensor or flexor (57.1%), achilles tendon (28.6%) and patella tendon (14.3%). Orthopaedic AF injuries are common presentations to EDs in Victoria, though few require specialist orthopaedic intervention. Injury profiles differed between genders suggesting that gender specific injury prevention and management might be required


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 48 - 48
1 Mar 2021
Matthies N Paul R Dwyer T Whelan D Chahal J
Full Access

Quadriceps tendon ruptures are a rare but debilitating injury resulting in loss of knee extension necessitating surgical intervention. Currently, multiple different surgical techniques and rehabilitation programs are utilized by surgeons. Researchers have been unable to determine the best surgical technique with respect to function and complication rate; certain techniques are more cost-effective than others. Early vs. late motion rehabilitation programs are utilized; recent evidence suggests that less aggressive initial rehabilitation may lead to decreased extensor lag and fewer additional surgeries. The goal of our study is to determine the treatment practices of orthopaedic surgeons across Canada. Our study was completed anonymously via . SurveyMonkey.com. (Palo Alto, California). Based on current literature, a 26-question survey was distributed. E-mail invitations were be sent to all members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Participation is voluntary. Currently, 104 surveys have been completed. 78% of respondents utilize transosseous drill holes, 13% utilize suture anchors and 9% utilize a combined surgical technique. The majority of surgeons begin range of motion (ROM) at 2 weeks (42%) or 6 weeks (24%); ROM is then commonly progressed in a step-wise fashion at 2-week intervals (58%). Approximately half of respondents have performed revision surgery for quadriceps re-rupture. Surgical management of quadriceps tendon ruptures is fairly consistent amongst Canadian orthopaedic surgeons. However, wide variation exists regarding rehabilitation, favoring early initiation and progression of ROM despite some evidence recommending a longer period of immobilization


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 54 - 54
1 May 2019
Rosenberg A
Full Access

General Principles. All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion. Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex mesh can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture. End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture. These can be repaired end-to-end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture. Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag, non-operative treatment in extension. A loose component and/or > 20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions. While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate. In chronic disruptions with loss of the patella, allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction may be considered. Marlex mesh repair has also been shown to be effective in reconstruction of chronic patellar and quadriceps tendon defects


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 116 - 116
1 Jun 2018
Jacobs J
Full Access

General Principles: All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion: Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture: End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture: These can be repaired end-to-end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture: Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag, non-operative treatment in extension. A loose component and/or > 20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions: While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate. In chronic disruptions with loss of the patella, allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction may be considered. Marlex mesh repair has also been shown to be effective in reconstruction of chronic patellar and quadriceps tendon defects


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 39 - 39
1 Dec 2021
Suren C Lazic I Stephan M von Eisenhart-Rothe R Prodinger PM
Full Access

Aim. The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging and relies on a combination of parameters. However, the currently recommended diagnostic algorithms have not been validated for patients with recent surgery, dislocation or other events associated with a local inflammatory response. As a result, these algorithms are not safely applicable offhand in such conditions. Calprotectin is a leukocyte protein that has been shown to be a reliable biomarker of PJI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of calprotectin to rule out PJI within 3 months after surgery or dislocation. Method. We included patients who underwent arthroplasty revision surgery at our institution within 3 months after any event causing inflammation. Calprotectin was measured using a lateral-flow assay. European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria were used as gold standard. The diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin was calculated. Results. Twenty-two patients (14 females, 8 males) with a mean age of 65.1 ± 12.3 years with 13 total hip (THA) and 9 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were included. There were 4 instances of possible early-onset acute infection, 4 dislocations, 2 patella tendon ruptures, 1 local tissue reaction to the sutures, 4 cases of early loosening, 2 component breakages and 1 avulsion of a polyethylene patella button. Using the EBJIS criteria, PJI was confirmed postoperatively in 12 cases. With a cut-off at 50mg/L, the calprotectin lateral flow test was positive in 10 cases. This results in a sensitivity of the calprotectin test of 0.75, a specificity of 0.9, positive and negative predictive values of 0.9 and 0.75, respectively, and a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 7.5 and 0.28, respectively. Conclusions. Aggravating the difficulties of ruling out PJI prior to revision surgery, local inflammation can be caused by some conditions in which the widely accepted PJI definition criteria cannot be applied. Nevertheless, an accurate diagnosis of PJI is just as crucial in these situations as it is in planned revision surgery. This study suggests that calprotectin is a promising diagnostic parameter for ruling out PJI in such cases. The calprotectin lateral-flow assay is readily applicable at the beginning of the procedure, yielding results that can assist in the decision whether to perform septic revision or aseptic partial or component exchange within 15 minutes, and with an overall accuracy of 81.8%


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 101 - 101
1 Apr 2017
Engh C
Full Access

Extensor mechanism complications after or during total knee arthroplasty are problematic. The prevalence ranges from 1–12% in TKR patients. Treatment results for these problems are inferior to the results of similar problems in non-TKR patients. Furthermore, the treatment algorithm is fundamentally different from that of non-TKR patients. The surgeon's first question does not focus on primary fixation; rather the surgeon must ask if the patient needs surgery and if so am I prepared to augment the repair? Quadriceps tendon rupture, periprosthetic patellar fracture, and patellar tendon rupture have similar treatment algorithms. Patients who are able to perform a straight leg raise and have less than a 20-degree extensor lag are generally treated non-operatively with extension bracing. The remaining patients will need surgical reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. Loose patellar components are removed. Primary repair alone is associated with poor results. Whole extensor mechanism allograft, Achilles tendon allograft, and synthetic mesh reconstruction are the current techniques for augmentation. In the acute setting if these are not available hamstring tendon harvest and augmentation is an option. Achilles tendons and synthetic mesh are easier to obtain than and entire extensor mechanism but are limited to patients that have an intact patella and the patella that can be mobilised to within 2–3 cm of the joint line. No matter which technique is used the principles are: rigid distal/tubercle fixation, coverage of allograft/mesh with host tissue to decrease infection, tensioning the augment material in extension, no flexion testing of reconstruction and post-operative extension bracing


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 54 - 54
1 Aug 2017
Rosenberg A
Full Access

General Principles - All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute Tibial Tuberosity Avulsion - Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilisation. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture - End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture - These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture - Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag. A loose component and/or >20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions - While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevent a “tension-free” repair. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate while in any patellar tendon defect, mesh repair has been shown to be effective. In most chronic disruptions with loss of the patella allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction may be considered


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 66 - 66
1 Nov 2016
Engh C
Full Access

Extensor mechanism complications after or during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are problematic. The prevalence ranges from 1%-12% in TKA patients. Treatment results for these problems are inferior to the results of similar problems in non-TKA patients. Furthermore, the treatment algorithm is fundamentally different from that of non-TKA patients. The surgeon's first question does not focus on primary fixation; rather the surgeon must ask if the patient needs surgery and if so am I prepared to augment the repair? Quadriceps tendon rupture, peri-prosthetic patellar fracture, and patellar tendon rupture have similar treatment algorithms. Patients who are able to perform a straight leg raise and have less than a 20-degree extensor lag are generally treated non-operatively with extension bracing. The remaining patients will need surgical reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. Loose patellar components are removed. Primary repair alone is associated with poor results. Whole extensor mechanism allograft, Achilles tendon allograft, and synthetic mesh reconstruction are the current techniques for augmentation. In the acute setting if these are not available, hamstring tendon harvest and augmentation is an option. Achilles tendons and synthetic mesh are easier to obtain than an entire extensor mechanism but are limited to patients that have an intact patella and the patella that can be mobilised to within 2–3 cm of the joint line. No matter which technique is used the principles are: rigid distal/tubercle fixation, coverage of allograft/mesh with host tissue to decrease infection, tensioning the augment material in extension, no flexion testing of reconstruction and post-operative extension bracing


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_22 | Pages 96 - 96
1 Dec 2016
Rosenberg A
Full Access

General Principles. All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion. Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6–8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture. End to end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture. These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture. Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag. A loose component and/or >20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions. While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally, an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate while in any patellar tendon defect, mesh repair has been shown to be effective


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 66 - 66
1 Nov 2015
Rosenberg A
Full Access

General Principles: All repairs should be repaired in full extension. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–12 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Marlex Mesh has been shown to be an excellent replacement as well as an augment for deficient soft tissue. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion: Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6–8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft or Marlex can provide additional support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture: End-to-end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture: These can be repaired end-to-end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turndown or mesh may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture: Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20 degree lag. A loose component and/or > 20 degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions: While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevents a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella remains viable and has not retracted proximally an Achilles tendon graft is appropriate while in any patellar tendon defect, mesh repair has been shown to be effective


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 103 - 103
1 Feb 2015
Rosenberg A
Full Access

General Principles. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–8 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion - Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6 to 8 weeks of immobilization. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft can provide additional structural support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture - End to end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture - These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turn-down may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture - Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension. If the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20-degree lag. A loose component and/or >20-degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions - While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevent a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions complete allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella itself has not retracted proximally and remains intact other allograft soft tissues are a viable alternative. All grafts should be repaired tightly with the knee in full extension


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 65 - 65
1 Jul 2014
Rosenberg A
Full Access

General Principles. Repairs should be immobilised in full extension for 6–8 weeks. Gradual resumption of motion in a hinged brace over an additional 6–8 weeks almost always yields flexion to at least 90 degrees. Acute tibial tuberosity avulsion. Open repair is best accomplished with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture, secured distally around a screw and washer followed by 6–8 weeks of immobilisation. Augmentation with a semitendinosus graft can provide additional structural support. Acute Patella Tendon Rupture. End to end repair is standard, but re-rupture is not uncommon, so supplemental semitendinosus reconstruction is recommended. The tendon is harvested proximally, left attached distally and passed through a transverse hole in the inferior patella. The gracilis tendon can be harvested and sutured to semitendinosus for additional length, if needed. Acute Quadriceps Tendon Rupture. These can be repaired end to end with a non-absorbable heavy Krackow suture. A superficial quadriceps fascial turn-down may be a useful adjunct. Patella Fracture. Treatment depends on the status of the patellar component and the loss of active extension if the component remains well fixed and the patient has less than a 20 degree lag. A loose component and/or >20 degree extensor lag requires ORIF +/− component revision. Chronic Disruptions. While standard repair techniques are possible, tissue retraction usually prevent a “tension-free” repair. In most chronic disruptions complete allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction is preferable. If the patella itself has not retracted proximally and remains intact, other allograft soft tissues are a viable alternative. All grafts should be repaired tightly with the knee in full extension


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXII | Pages 16 - 16
1 Jul 2012
Granville-Chapman J Hacker A Keightley A Sarkhel T Monk J Gupta R
Full Access

Extensor tendon ruptures have been reported in up to 8.8% of patients after volar plating and long screws have been implicated. The dihedral dorsal surface of the distal radius hinders accurate screw length determination using standard radiographic views (lateral; pronation and supination). A ‘dorsal tangential’ view has recently been described, but has not been validated. To validate this view, we mounted a plate-instrumented sawbone onto a jig. Radiographs at different angles were reviewed independently by 11 individuals. Skyline views clearly demonstrated all screw tips, whereas only 69% of screw tips were identifiable on standard views. With screws 2mm proud of the dorsal surface, skyline views detected 67% of long screws (sensitivity). The best of the standard views achieved only 11% sensitivity. At 4mm long, skyline sensitivity was 85%, compared with 25% for standard views. At 6mm long, 100% of long screws were detected on skylines, but only 50% of 8mm long screws were detected by standard views. Inter and intra-observer variability was 0.97 (p=0.005). For dorsal screw length determination of the distal radius, the skyline view is superior to standard views. It is simple to perform and its introduction should reduce the incidence of volar plate-related extensor tendon rupture


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 86 - 86
1 Jul 2020
Ashjaee N Johnston G Johnston J
Full Access

Distal radius fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures among women. The treatment of these fractures has been shifting from a traditional non-operative approach to surgery, using volar locking plate (VLP) technology. Surgery, however, is not without risk, complications including failure to restore an anatomic reduction, fracture re-displacement, and tendon rupture. The VLP implant is also marked by bone loss due to stress-shielding related to its high stiffness relative to adjacent bone. Recently, a novel internal, composite-based implant, with a stiffness less than the VLP, was designed to eradicate the shortcomings associated with the VLP implant. It is unclear, however, what effect this less-stiff implant will have upon adjacent bone density distributions long-term. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of the two implants (the novel surgical implant and the gold-standard VLP) by using subject-specific finite element (FE) models integrated with an adaptive bone formation/resorption algorithm. Specimen: One fresh-frozen human forearm specimen (female, age = 84 years old) was imaged using CT and was used to create a subject-specific FE model of the radius. Finite element modeling: In order to simulate a clinically relevant (unstable) fracture of the distal radius, a wedge of bone was removed from the model, which was approximately 10 mm wide and centered 20 mm proximal to the tip of the radial styloid. Bone remodeling algorithm: A strain-energy density (SED) based bone remodeling theory was used to account for bone remodeling. With this approach, bone density decreased linearly when SED per bone density was less than 67.5 µJ/g and increased when it was more than 232.5 µJ/g. When it was in the lazy zone (67.5 to 232.5 µJ/g), no changes in density occurred. Boundary conditions: A 180 N quasi-static force representing the scaphoid, and a 120 N quasi-static force representing the lunate was applied to the radius. The midshaft of the radius was constrained. FE outcomes: To examine the effects of stress shielding associated with each implant, the long-term changes of bone density within proximal transverse cross-sections of radius were inspected. The regional density analysis focused on three transverse cross-sections. The transverse cross-sections were positioned proximal to the subchondral plate, and were distanced 50 (cross-section A), 57 (cross-section B), and 64 mm (cross-section C) from the subchondral endplate. For both implants in all three cross-sections, cortical bone was reserved completely at the volar side. On the dorsal side, the cortical bone was completely resorbed in the VLP model. In all cross-sections, the averaged resultant density was higher for the “novel implant”. The difference ranged from 33% (cross-section A) to 36% (cross-section C) in favor of the “novel implant”. On average, the density values of the novel implant were 34% higher in transverse cross-sections (A, B, and C). This study showed that the novel implant offered higher density distributions compared to the VLP, which suggests that the novel implant may be superior to the VLP in terms of avoiding stress shielding


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 21 - 21
1 May 2019
Flatow E
Full Access

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures continue to increase in prevalence and controversy still remains about the optimal method to manage the subscapularis. Scalise et al. performed an analysis of 20 osteotomies and 15 tenotomy procedures, and found the tenotomy group had a higher rate of abnormal subscapularis tendons on ultrasound examination. There was one tendon rupture in the subscapularis tenotomy group and no ruptures in the osteotomy group. Jandhyala et al. retrospectively examined 26 lesser tuberosity osteotomies and 10 subscapularis tenotomies for arthroplasty, and their study demonstrated a significant improvement in the belly press test for the osteotomy group. Lapner et al. performed a randomised controlled trial assigning patients to either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or a subscapularis peel procedure. They evaluated 36 osteotomies and 37 subscapularis peels. The outcomes evaluated were Dynamometer internal rotation strength, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and in a subsequent paper they evaluated the healing rates and Goutallier grade. Their studies illustrated no difference in the internal rotation strength between groups. Both groups significantly improved WOOS and ASES scores postoperatively, but the difference was not significant between groups. Goutallier grade increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Overall, the different approaches have not demonstrated a meaningful clinical difference. Further studies are needed to help understand issues leading to subscapularis complications after arthroplasty


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 152 - 152
1 Jan 2016
Liu B Lodge C Budgen A
Full Access

Background. Operative fixation of acute tendo-achilles ruptures remains controversial. Standard surgical exposure is associated with and increased risk of wound breakdown and infections. The mini-open technique was developed to minimise these risks and provide anatomical reduction/apposition of the tendon rupture. Methods. We present a retrospective case series of 27 patients who were treated operatively for acute Achilles tendon rupture in the hands of 1 surgeon, between 4–6 years post operatively, using Achillon instrumentation. Post operatively they were treated with an air cast boot and 3 wedges, bringing the foot into neutral by 6 weeks followed by a rehabilitation programme. The patients were contacted via telephone and consent was obtained. The complications, Leppilahti score and ATRS score were then calculated. Results. 2 patients underwent a further operation (one for a retained suture and another for a re-rupture in an uncompliant patient), in total there were 2 re-ruptures (another patient sustained a partial rupture which was treated conservatively). There were no patients who sustained a wound problem or infection (other than the patient already mentioned). There were 3 patients who complained of ongoing altered sensation in the sural nerve distribution, and 4 who had paraesthesia post operativeley that completely resolved within 3 months. There were no DVT/PE reported and the average Leppilahti score was 85.7/100 (excellent outcome) and ATRS 93.3/100 (excellent outcome). Conclusion. This study shows that the mini-open technique can be used successfully to treat acute tendo-Achilles ruptures with excellent long term outcome


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 20 - 20
1 Jul 2014
Flatow E
Full Access

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures continue to increase in prevalence, and controversy still remains about the optimal method to manage the subscapularis. Scalise et al. performed an analysis of 20 osteotomies and 15 tenotomy procedures, and found the tenotomy group had a higher rate of abnormal subscapularis tendons on ultrasound examination. There was one tendon rupture in the subscapularis tenotomy group and no ruptures in the osteotomy group. Jandhyala et al. retrospectively examined 26 lesser tuberosity osteotomies and 10 subscapularis tenotomies for arthroplasty, and their study demonstrated a significant improvement in the belly press test for the osteotomy group. Lapner et al. performed a randomised controlled trial assigning patient to either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or a subscapularis peel procedure. They evaluated 36 osteotomies and 37 subscapularis peels. The outcomes evaluated were Dynamometer internal rotation strength, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and in a subsequent paper they evaluated the healing rates and Goutallier grade. Their studies illustrated no difference in the internal rotation strength between groups. Both groups significantly improved WOOS and ASES scores post-operatively, but the difference was not significant between groups. Goutallier grade increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Overall, the different approaches have not demonstrated a meaningful clinical difference. Further studies are needed to help understand issues leading to subscapularis complications after arthroplasty