Introduction. Although Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) generally provides favorable clinical outcomes, its complications have been reported with high rate compared with other joints. Previously, we used the Bryan & Morrey approach in TEA, which included separating the triceps muscle subperiosteally from the olecranon; however, since 2008, in order to prevent skin trouble and deficiency of the triceps, we performed TEA by MISTEA method, which required no removal of the subcutaneous tissue in the region of the olecranon and no release or stripping of the triceps tendon. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the MISTEA method by evaluating and comparing muscle strength and complications by using both the Bryan & Morrey approach and MISTEA method. Materials and Methods. The study was conducted on 23 elbows, on which elbow muscle strength could be measured postoperatively at more than 6 months after TEA. Thirteen elbows were operated on the Bryan & Morrey approach (BM group; mean age, 62.3 years; mean follow-up period, 27 months), and 10 elbows on the MISTEA method (MIS group; mean age, 67.6 years; mean follow-up period, 19.1 months). To determine the elbow extensor and flexor strengths, measurements were conducted on the affected side for the BM group, and on both the affected and healthy sides for the MIS group. Further, the “extension/flexion ratio” as well as the “affected/healthy side ratio” and complications were assessed. Results. Excluding the elbow extensor strength of 3 elbows in the BM group, which could not be measured too week. The extension/flexion ratio was as follows: in the BM group, 0.61 and in the MIS group, 0.93 on the affected side and 0.81 on the healthy side. For the MIS group, in which measurements could be performed on both the sides, the “affected/healthy side ratio” was 0.72 in flexion and 0.91 in extension. In terms of complications, skin trouble was found on 2 elbows in the BM group and on 1 elbow in the MIS group; further, rupture of the triceps tendon was suspected in 3 elbows in the BM group but was not found in the MIS group. Discussion. In our study, deficiency in triceps muscle was found in 3 of 13 elbows with the Bryan & Morrey approach. MISTEA method may be the reason for prevention of deficiency or rupture of the triceps tendon. The MIS group had higher extension/flexion ratio in the affected side, suggesting the possibility that either the extensor strength had increased or the flexor strength had weakened. Further, in the MIS group, the extension showed an “affected/healthy side” ratio, which means that an extensor strength almost equivalent to that of the healthy side was maintained, whereas the flexor strength was 72% of that on the healthy side, suggesting that the flexor strength may have decreased. Loss of the flexor strength may be because the MISTEA method involves partial release of the brachialis muscle and the joint's center of rotation to move slightly towards the proximal side

Heterotopic Ossification (HO) is a known complication that can arise after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In most cases it is asymptomatic, however, in some patients it can limit range of motion and lead to poor outcomes. The objective of this review was to assess and report incidence, risk factors, prophylaxis, and management of HO after TEA. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed to retrieve all relevant studies evaluating occurrence of HO after TEA. The search was performed in duplicate and a quality assessment was performed of all included studies. A total of 1907 studies were retrieved of which 45 studies were included involving 2256 TEA patients. HO was radiographically present in 10% of patients and was symptomatic in 3%. Less than 1% of patients went on to surgical excision of HO, with outcomes following surgery reported as good or excellent as assessed by range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS). TEA due to ankylosis, primary osteoarthritis, and posttraumatic arthritis are more likely to develop symptomatic HO. HO is an uncommon complication following TEA with the majority of patients developing HO being asymptomatic and requiring no surgical management. Routine HO prophylaxis for TEA is not supported by the literature. The effectiveness of prophylaxis in high risk patients is uncertain and future studies are required to clarify its usefulness. The strength of these conclusions are limited by inconsistent reporting in the available literature

Mechanical alignment (MA) techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may introduce significant anatomic modifications, as it is known that few patients have neutral femoral, tibial or overall lower limb mechanical axes. A total of 1000 knee CT-Scans were analyzed from a database of patients undergoing TKA. MA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated. Femoral rotation was aligned with either the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA) or with 3° of external rotation to the posterior condyles (PC). Medial-lateral (DML) and flexion-extension (DFE) gap differences were calculated. Extension space ML imbalances (3mm) occurred in 25% of varus and 54% of valgus knees and significant imbalances (5mm) were present in up to 8% of varus and 19% of valgus knees. For the flexion space DML, higher imbalance rates were created by the TEA technique (p < 0 .001). In valgus knees, TEA resulted in a DML in flexion of 5 mm in 42%, compared to 7% for PC. In varus knees both techniques performed better. When all the differences between DML and DFE are considered together, using TEA there were 18% of valgus knees and 49% of varus knees with < 3 mm imbalances throughout, and using PC 32% of valgus knees and 64% of varus knees. Significant anatomic modifications with related ML or FE gap imbalances are created using MA for TKA. Using MA techniques, PC creates less imbalances than TEA. Some of these imbalances may not be correctable by the surgeon and may explain post-operative TKA instability. Current imaging technology could predict preoperatively these intrinsic imitations of MA. Other alignment techniques that better reproduce knee anatomies should be explored

Background. The use of tranexamic acid (TEA) can significantly reduce the need for allogenic blood transfusions in elective primary joint arthroplasty. Revision total hip arthroplasty requires increased utilization of post-operative blood transfusions for acute blood loss anemia compared to elective primary hip replacement. There is limited literature to support the routine use of TEA in revision THA. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 161 consecutive patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty from 2012–14 at a single institution by two fellowship-trained surgeons. We compared the transfusion requirements and the post-operative hemoglobin drop of the TEA Group (109 patients, 114 hips) versus the No TEA group (52 patients, 56 hips). Our standard protocol for administering TEA is 1000mg IV at incision, and the same dose repeated two hours later. The No TEA group did not receive the medication because of previous hospital contraindication criteria. Results. The transfusion rate was significantly less for the TEA group (7%) compared to the No TEA group (34%) (p < 0.0001). The mean hemoglobin delta was also significantly less for the TEA group (2.0 ± 1.3 g/dL) compared to the No TEA group (3.5 ± 1.4 g/dL, p < 0.0001). No adverse thromboembolic events occurred in the patients who received TEA. Conclusion. The routine use of TEA during revision total hip arthroplasty demonstrated a significant reduction in allogenic blood transfusion rates. The post-operative hemoglobin drop was also significantly less with the use of TEA. We recommend the routine use of TEA during revision THA

Tranexamic acid (TEA), an antifibrinolytic agent, is routinely used for reduction of blood loss in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, use of intravenous (IV) TEA has been questioned due to safety concerns and a lack of biochemical data in the arthroplasty literature. Tranexamic acid given topically as a periarticular solution is a promising alternative route of administration. The purpose of this study is to identify differences in systemic absorption for intravenous and topical TEA administered during primary THA. In a blinded randomised controlled trial of patients undergoing primary cementless total hip arthroplasty, 29 participants received a weight-based bolus infusion of intravenous TEA (20 mg/kg) 10 minutes prior to skin incision. Conversely, 15 participants received a 1.5 g bolus dose of TEA administered topically into the periarticular region of the operative hip at the time of arthrotomy closure. A blood sample was drawn one hour post-administration for measurement of serum TEA concentration (µg/mL) by tandem mass spectrometry. In addition to comparing mean concentration levels for both treatment arms, each sample concentration was referenced to a pre-determined TEA concentration threshold of 10 µg/mL, a value known to represent 80% tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) inhibition in vivo. Those participants receiving topical TEA had four-fold lower TEA levels at one hour postoperatively (mean 12.44 ± 17.59 versus 52.54 ± 23.94 µg/mL, p<0.05). These results demonstrate significantly lower circulating TEA at one hour after topical administration. Intravenous TEA must travel through the intravascular compartment in order to reach the operative hip. Topical administration of TEA targets bleeding tissues within the surgical field without necessitating parenteral administration. This results in less inhibition of tPA away from the operative site, potentially decreasing the risk of developing a pro-thrombotic state postoperatively. Correlating these results with outcomes from clinical efficacy trials comparing intravenous and topical TEA use in THA will further clarify optimal dosing strategies

Mechanical alignment (MA) techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) introduces significant anatomic modifications and secondary ligament imbalances. A restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol was proposed to minimise these issues and improve TKA clinical results. A total of 1000 knee CT-Scans were analyzed from a database of patients undergoing TKA. rKA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated. rKA is defined by the following criteria: Independent tibial and femoral cuts within ± 5° of the bone neutral mechanical axis and, a resulting HKA within ± 3° of neutral. Medial-lateral (ΔML) and flexion-extension (ΔFE) gap differences were calculated and compared with MA results. With the MA technique, femoral rotation was aligned with either the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA) or with 3° of external rotation to the posterior condyles (PC). Extension space ML imbalances (>/=3mm) occurred in 33% of TKA with MA technique versus 8% of the knees with rKA (p /=5mm) were present in up to 11% of MA knees versus 1% rKA (p < 0 .001). Using the MA technique, for the flexion space ΔML, higher imbalance rates were created by the TEA technique (p < 0 .001). rKA again performed better than both MA techniques using TEA of 3 degrees PC techniques (p < 0 .001). When all the differences between ΔML and ΔFE are considered together: using TEA there were 40.8% of the knees with < 3 mm imbalances throughout, using PC this was 55.3% and using rKA it was 91.5% of the knees (p < 0 .001). Significantly less anatomic modifications with related ML or FE gap imbalances are created using rKA versus MA for TKA. Using rKA may help the surgeon to balance a TKA, whilst keeping the alignment within a safe range

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) usage is increasing owing to expanded surgical indications, better implant designs, and improved long-term survival. Correct humeral implant positioning has been shown to diminish stem loading in vitro, and radiographic loosening in in the long-term. Replication of the native elbow centre of rotation is thought to restore normal muscle moment arms and has been suggested to improve elbow strength and function. While much of the focus has been on humeral component positioning, little is known about the effect of positioning of the ulnar stem on post-operative range of motion and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the sagittal alignment and positioning of the humeral and ulnar components on the functional outcomes after TEA. Between 2003 and 2016, 173 semi-constrained TEAs (Wright-Tornier Latitude/Latitude EV, Memphis, TN, USA) were performed at our institution, and our preliminary analysis includes 46 elbows in 41 patients (39 female, 7 male). Patients were excluded if they had severe elbow deformity precluding reliable measurement, experienced a major complication related to an ipsilateral upper limb procedure, or underwent revision TEA. For each elbow, saggital alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. A best fit circle of the trochlea and capitellum was drawn, with its centre representing the rotation axis. Ninety degree tangent lines from the intramedullary axes of the ulna and humerus, and from the olecranon tip to the centre of rotation were drawn and measured relative to the rotation axis, representing the ulna posterior offset, humerus offset, and ulna proximal offset, respectively. In addition, we measured the ulna stem angle (angle subtended by the implant and the intramedullary axis of the ulna), as well as radial neck offset (the length of a 90o tangent line from the intramedullary axis of the radial neck and the centre of rotation) in patients with retained or replaced radial heads. Our primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score recorded at the latest follow-up for each patient. Our secondary outcome measures were postoperative flexion, extension, pronation and supination measured at the same timepoints. Each variable was tested for linear correlation with the primary and secondary outcome measures using the Pearson two-tailed test. At an average follow-up of 6.8 years (range 2–14 years), there was a strong positive correlation between anterior radial neck offset and the quickDASH (r=0.60, p=0.001). There was also a weak negative correlation between the posterior offset of the ulnar component and the qDASH (r=0.39, p=0.031), and a moderate positive correlation between the change in humeral offset and elbow supination (r=0.41, p=0.044). The ulna proximal offset and ulna stem angle were not correlated with either the primary, or secondary outcome measures. When performing primary TEA with radial head retention, or replacement, care should be taken to ensure that the ulnar component is correctly positioned such that intramedullary axis of the radial neck lines up with the centre of elbow rotation, as this strongly correlates with better function and less pain after surgery

Introduction. Proper femoral component rotation is a crucial factor in successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Femoral component rotation using anatomic landmarks has traditionally been established by referencing the transepicondylar axis (TEA), Whiteside's Line (WSL), or the posterior condylar axis (PCA). TEA is thought to best approximate the flexion-axis of the knee, however WSL or PCA are commonly used as surrogates of the TEA in the operating room due to their accessibility. The relationship of these anatomic landmarks has been previously investigated in anatomic and computed tomography based studies. The relatively few knees evaluated have limited the power of these studies. Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an emerging technology in total knee replacement. The purpose of this study was to use magnetic resonance imaging based planning software to assess the relationship of WSL and PCA to the TEA and to determine if the relationships were influenced by the magnitude of the pre-operative coronal deformity. Methods. Five hundred sixty total knee replacements were performed in 510 patients utilizing PSI. The Materialize preoperative planning software was utilized to determine the rotational relationships of TEA, WSL, and PCA (Fig 1). The coronal plane deformity of each patient was also evaluated utilizing the MRI-based imaging and planning software. Results. The WSL is externally rotated by 90.36 degrees (SD ±2.3 degrees) compared to the TEA and the PCA is 2.38 degrees (SD ±1.6 degrees) internally rotated compared to the TEA in the overall population (p<0.001). The relationship of WSL to TEA has more variability than the relationship of PCA to TEA. In the overall population only 77% of WSL and 74% of PCA based resection will be within 2 degrees of the TEA. The PCA is more internally rotated in females and in valgus knees (P<0.001) however is not affected by the degree of valgus deformity (p = 0.211). Discussion. Femoral component rotation is determined based on one of three axis options. Classic studies have shown that the TEA is perpendicular to the WSL and the PCA is 3 degrees internally rotated to the TEA. However, there is wide variation in the relationships. Our MRI based evaluation shows that both WSL and PCA approximate the TEA in valgus knees regardless of the degree of deformity. Our study also shows that on average the PCA is 2.38 degrees internally rotated compared to the TEA, not the previously assumed 3 degrees. Our study indicates that the PCA is more internally rotated compared to the TEA in female patients and patients with valgus deformity. Males with varus knees may only require a 2 degree internal rotation correction rather than the historically established 3 degrees. WSL also shows more variability in its relationship to the TEA compared to the PCA. Advanced imaging can assist surgeons in assessing their options for femoral component rotation in TKA. Our data indicates that the relationships of axis options and historical assumptions may need to be reassessed as imaging technology advances

A primary goal of revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (rTKA) is restoration of the Joint Line (JL) and Posterior Condylar Offsets (PCO). The presence of a native contralateral joint allows JL and PCO to be inferred in a way that could account for patient-specific anatomical variations more accurately than current techniques. This study assesses bilateral distal femoral symmetry in the context of defining targets for restoration of JL and PCO in rTKA. 566 pre-operative CTs for bilateral TKAs were segmented and landmarked by two engineers. Landmarks were taken on both femurs at the medial and lateral epicondyles, distal and posterior condyles and hip and femoral centres. These landmarks were used to calculate the distal and posterior offsets on the medial and lateral sides (MDO, MPO, LDO, LPO respectively), the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), TEA to PCA angle (TEAtoPCA) and anatomic to mechanical axis angle (AAtoMA). Mean bilateral differences in these measures were calculated and cases were categorised according to the amount of asymmetry. The database analysed included 54.9% (311) females with a mean population age of 68.8 (±7.8) years. The mean bilateral difference for each measure was: LDFA 1.4° (±1.0), TEAtoPCA 1.3° (±0.9), AAtoMA 0.5° (±0.5), MDO 1.4mm (±1.1), MPO 1.0mm (±0.8). The categorisation of asymmetry for each measure was: LDFA had 39.9% of cases with <1° bilateral difference and 92.4% with <3° bilateral difference, TEAtoPCA had 45.8% <1° and 96.6% <3°, AAtoMA had 85.7% <1° and 99.8% <3°, MDO had 46.2% <1mm and 90.3% <3mm, MPO had 57.0% <1mm and 97.9% <3mm. This study presents evidence supporting bilateral distal femoral symmetry. Using the contralateral anatomy to obtain estimates for JL and PCO in rTKA may result in improvements in intraoperative accuracy compared to current techniques and a more patient specific solution to operative planning

Introduction. Most surgeons utilize one of three axis options in conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the transepicondylar axis (TEA), Whiteside's line (WSL) or the posterior condylar axis (PCA) with an external rotation correction factor. Each option has limitations and no clear algorithm has been determined for which option to use and when. Many surgeons believe the TEA to be the gold standard for determining rotation however it can be difficult to access intraoperatively. WSL and PCA have been used as surrogates for determining axial rotation in conventional TKA but may also be prone to error. MRI based preoperative planning systems overcome intraoperative limitations while accounting for the individual anatomy of each patient, thus helping optimize femoral component rotation. The goal of this study was to examine if coronal plane deformity had any effect on the relationship of conventional referencing options such as WSL and PCA to the TEA. Methods. Utilizing a preoperative planning software based on MRI, we compared the preoperative posterior femoral condyle resections for three different axis options in 176 TKA. The difference in bone resection amount was used to determine the rotational differences between the axis options in all knees. Assuming that the TEA was the ideal rotational axis, we compared the TEA to both WSL and PCA. A 1-sample t-test and paired t-test were then used to determine if there was a significant rotational difference between the various axis options when accounting for degree and direction of preoperative deformity in the coronal plane. Results. In the overall population of 176 knees (42 valgus, 134 varus), neither WSL or PCA approximated the TEA accurately (p=0.016 and 0.001). In valgus deformity, WSL was found to approximate the TEA (p=0.68) better than the PCA (p=0.21). Minor varus deformity (< 3 degrees) favored the use of PCA (0.53) while moderate varus deformity (3–6 degrees) favored use of WSL (p=0.76). Severe varus (>6 degrees) deformity favored use of PCA due to lower variability. For complete results see Figure 2. Conclusion. Based on MRI data, our study indicates that preoperative coronal plane deformity should help determine the specific referencing option utilized for femoral component rotation in TKA. Broad application of either WSL or the PCA to all patients regardless of preoperative deformity did not accurately approximate TEA in femoral component rotation. Rather, analysis of the degree and direction of preoperative coronal plane deformity indicates that WSL and PCA should be used in specific scenarios to approximate the TEA. When WSL or PCA either both approximate or do not approximate the TEA, we recommend using the option with a lower standard deviation, and thus less variability. Although this MRI based technology is not in widespread use, we believe our findings (Figure 1) can assist the majority of surgeons determine when to use WSL or the PCA based on preoperative coronal plane deformity

Introduction. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have found correspondence between transepicondylar axis (TEA) and functional flexion axis (FFA) in healthy subjects. In addition some studies suggest that the use of FFA for rotational alignment of femoral implant may be more accurate than TEA. Ostheoarthritis (OA) may modify limb alignment and therefore flexion axis, introducing a bias at different flexion ranges during kinematic acquisition. In this study we want to understand whether OA affects somehow the FFA evaluation compared to TEA and whether the FFA could be considered a usable reference for implant positioning for osteoarthritic knees. Methods. We included a group of 111 patients undergoing TKA. With a navigation system, we recorded intraoperative kinematic data in three different ranges of motion (0°-120°; 35°-80°; 35°-120°). We compared the difference in orientation of FFA (computed with the mean helical axis method) in the three ranges as also the difference with the TEA on frontal and axial planes. The correlation of preoperative limb deformity with FFA and TEA was also performed. Results. In OA patients an average difference of −2.8° ± 5.0° between TEA and FFA was found on frontal plane, while on axial plane results showed a difference of 0.6° ± 4.7°. No statistical difference was found among the three ranges in axial view whereas some difference was found in frontal view (p<0.0001). Angle between TEA and FFA was not correlated with limb alignment on axial plane, while it was, even if poor, in frontal plane. Conclusions. In pathological knees there is the same correspondence between TEA and FFA both in frontal and axial plane and preoperative limb alignment does not correlate with orientation of FFA and TEA. Results are in agreement to studies on healthy subjects. FFA can be used as reference for femoral implant positioning in axial plane also in pathologic knees, while for the frontal plane further investigations are required

Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) is a procedure to treat a number of conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), post-traumatic arthritis, and osteoarthritis. To date, there has been minimal literature published on the Latitude since its release in 2001. There is one study reporting outcomes from the Latitude, a German study published in 2010. The purpose of this study was to analyse outcomes from primary Latitude TEAs. We performed a retrospective case series of 23 TEAs performed on 20 patients. 6 patients required revision surgery and were not included in the analysis. One patient was lost to follow up, resulting in 17 patients included for ROM analysis. All patients received Latitude TEA through a posterior approach and underwent a standard rehab protocol. 11 Patients were recalled at least two years post-op and were administered DASH and MAYO questionnaires. Complications such as triceps insufficiency, ulnar nerve dysfunction, infection, and aseptic loosening were recorded. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test in STATA. Immediate post-op radiographs and patients most recent radiographs were analysed by a blinded upper-extremity surgeon not involved in the initial operation and analysed for loosening and implant malpostioning. Mean follow up was 4.8 years (range 2.6–7.5 years). Analysis of 17 TEAs in 16 patients revealed no difference in pre-operative ROM and post-operative ROM for flexion (121°±20 vs 129°±16, p=0.13) extension (40°±27 vs 27°±15, p=0.19), pronation (73°±13 vs 75°±24, p=0.55) or supination (64°±22 vs 68°±14, p=0.52). Patients who underwent TEA for RA had a significant improvement in flexion (121°±15 vs 135°±10, p<0.02). There was a statistically significant improvement in flexion-extension arc post-operatively (101°±28) compared to pre-operative scores (83±23 degrees, p<0.02). DASH and MAYO scores were calculated from 11elbows in 11 non-revision patients able to return for examination. The average MAYO score was 87.9 with nine patients in the “excellent” category, two patients in the “good” category, one patient in the “fair” category, and one in the “poor” category. The average DASH score was 32.9. Two patients underwent revision for periprosthetic fractures, two patients underwent revision for infection, one underwent revision for aseptic loosening and two for radial head dissociation (rate of 30%). This is one of the first studies examining the outcomes of the Latitude TEA. This retrospective case series demonstrates that the Latitude TEA has promising outcomes with respect to improving patient pain and functioning as assessed by the MAYO. Treatment using the Latitude TEA results in favorable functional outcomes for a majority of patients and offers an improvement in flexion-extension arc. Furthermore, our results are comparable to the MAYO scores reported by other studies analysing different prosthesis designs. The complication rate in our series was comparable to published rates of 20–40%

We aimed to assess the functional outcomes of elderly patients with isolated comminuted distal humerus fractures that were managed non-operatively. Retrospective analysis of patients over 65 years presenting to our unit between 2005–2015 was undertaken. 67 patients were identified, 7 had immediate TEA, 41 died and 5 were lost to follow-up leaving 14 available for review. Mean Follow-up was 55 months(range 17–131) Patient functional outcomes were measured using VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity, and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES). Need for conversion to TEA and complications were recorded. The mean age at injury was 76 years(range 65–90) of which 79%(11/14) were females. The mean score on the OES was 46(range 29 – 48). The mean VAS score at rest was 0.4(range 0–6) and the mean VAS score during activity was 1.3(range 0–9). 93%(13/14) of patients reported no pain (0 out of 10 on the numeric scale for pain) in their injured elbow at rest and 79%(11/14) reported no pain during activity. No patients converted to TEA and there were no complications. Non-operative management of comminuted distal humerus fractures should be considered for elderly patients, avoiding surgical risks whilst giving satisfactory functional outcomes in this low demand group

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor. As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for independent 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the TEA. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal. Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise. The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration. Given these ideals, to what extent are patients improved? The concept of reproducing bony anatomy is based on the pretext that form will dictate function, such that normal-leaning anatomy will tend towards normal-leaning kinematics. Therefore, we seek to evaluate knee function based on objective assessments of movement or kinematics. In summary, the use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of postoperative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality

Background. Mechanical alignment (MA) techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) introduce significant anatomic modifications and secondary ligament imbalances. A restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol was proposed to minimize these issues and improve TKA clinical results. Method. rKA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated on 1000 knee CT-Scans from a database of patients undergoing TKA. rKA is defined by the following criteria: Independent tibial and femoral cuts within ± 5° of the bone neutral mechanical axis and; a resulting HKA within ±3° of neutral. Medial-lateral (ΔML) and flexion-extension (ΔFE) gap differences were calculated and compared with measured resection MA results. Results. Extension space ML imbalances ≥3mm occurred in 33% of TKA with MA technique versus 8% with rKA, and ≥5mm were present in up to 11% of MA knees versus 1% rKA (p<0.001). Using the MA technique, for the flexion space, higher ML imbalance rates were created by both MA techniques (using TEA or 3°PC) versus rKA (p<0.001). When all the differences between ΔML and ΔFE are considered together: using MA with TEA there were 41% of the knees with <3mm imbalances throughout; using PC this was 55% and using rKA it was 92% (p<0.001). Conclusion. Significantly less ML or FE gap imbalances are created using rKA versus MA for TKA. Using rKA may help the surgeon to preserve native knee ligament balance during TKA and avoid residual instability, whilst keeping the lower limb alignment within a safe range

Purpose. Clinical outocome of revision total elbow arthroplasty(TEA) in rheumatoid arthritis(RA) patients were evaluated. Methods. Clinical outocome of revision TEA that underwent between 2005 and 2013 were evaluated. Causes of revision, implanted revised prosthesis, a clinical score (the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) elbow assessment score), the arc of motion and complications were investigated. Totally, 6 patients underwent revision TEA. The patients were females with a mean age of 60.4 years (range, 32 to 72). Results. Seventy-two primary TEAs were done in corresponding period. Six out of 72 (8.3%) TEAs were revised. Causes of revision were loosening, instability (dislocation) and breakage of a component in 3, 2 and 1 cases, respectively. A mean duration from initial TEA to revision surgery was 10.3 years (range, 1 to 13). Semi-constrained arthroplasties (5 Coonrad-Morrey, 1 Discovery) were used for revision surgery. A mean JOA elbow assessment score improved from 59 to 81 point at the time of follow up. The mean ROM, flexion was improved 125 degrees, to 131 degrees. Extension, supination and pronation was not changed. A fracture at the time of implant withdrawal occurred as an intraoperative complication. The fractures were recovered by wiring with autologous bone graft from the ilium and a good bone union was achieved in 2 out of 3 cases. However, a re-revision surgery with plate was required in the remaining case. Conclusions. Revision TEA provided a satisfactory functional outcome. An intraoperative fracture was a critical complication in this procedure

Computer navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of total knee replacement (TKR) when compared to intra or extra osseous referencing. Currently the surgical transepicondylar axis (TEA) is used to help determine femoral component rotation. This relies on the surgeon identifying medial and lateral epicondyles intra-operatively. This process has been shown to have a high variability and operator dependency. The functional flexion axis (FFA) of the femur is a kinematically derived reference axis which has previously been shown in a cadaveric model to correspond well with the transepicondylar axis. This study was therefore designed to evaluate its accuracy in vivo. 50 patients undergoing total knee replacement under the care of the three senior authors were prospectively recruited. A preoperative CT scan was obtained and the TEA evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. TKR was undertaken in the standard fashion using Stryker navigation. The FFA was derived at 3 time points during the procedure: pre-incision, post osseous registration and following component implantation. The deviations of the FFA and surgical TEA (surTEA) to the CT-derived TEA (ctTEA) was calculated and comparisons drawn between the 2 methods with respect to validity, as well as within and between-patient reproducibility. While the FFA results were highly correlated between pre and post-arthrotomy (r = 0.89), the post-incision FFA (−1.60+/−3.7) was significantly internally rotated (p<0.01) relative to the pre-incision FFA (−2.50+/−3.4). In addition the surgical TEA (−0.40+/−3.6) was significantly internally rotated (p = 0.02) relative to the post-incision FFA (1.80+/−3.7) for the combined data from all 2 surgeons. However, when examined individually, 1 of the 2 surgeons showed no significant difference between the FFA and TEA. In addition, the two methods demonstrated comparable between-patient variability in the knee axis, although surgeon-dependent patterns remained. The FFA has been shown to be of equivalent accuracy to the surgical TEA but surprisingly does not avoid its operator-dependency. Further evaluation of the FFA method with possible adjustments to the algorithm is warranted

Purpose. To validate accuracy of transepicondylar axis as a reference for femoral component rotation in primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods. A prospective study done from dec 2010 to dec 2011 at tertiary centre. 80 knees were included (43 females and 21 males). All surgeries were carried out by one senior arthroplasty surgeon. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included and all revision cases were excluded. Intraoperative assessment of TEA was done by palpating most prominent point on lateral epicondyle and sulcus on medial epicondyle and passing a k wire through it. Confirmation is done under image intensifier C arm with epicondylar view. Postoperative TEA was assessed by taking CT scan, measuring condylar twist angle and posterior condylar angle. Also correlation of femoral component rotation with postoperative anterior knee pain was assessed. Results. The mean PCA was around 4° with TEA as reference and only 10% patients required an additional lateral release of which 2% patient had preop patellar maltracking. No postoperative patellar maltracking was seen. Anterior knee pain was present in 8% patients. No postop infection is noted. Alignment ranging from 3° to 9° external rotation. Conclusion. TEA is most accurate reference for femoral component rotation even in severely deformed arthritic knees. Key words – Transepicondylar axis, total knee arthroplasty, femoral component rotation,

Purpose:. To compare accuracy of transepicondylar axis as a reference for femoral component rotation in primary navigated versus non navigated total knee arthroplasty in severely deformed knees. Methods:. A prospective study done from dec 2009 to dec 2011 at tertiary centre. 180 knees were included (124 females and 56 males). All cases were randomly allocated into 2 groups: navigated and non navigated. All surgeries were carried out by two senior arthroplasty surgeons. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included and all revision cases were excluded. Intraoperative assessment of TEA was done by palpating most prominent point on lateral epicondyle and sulcus on medial epicondyle and passing a k wire through it. Confirmation is done under image intensifier C arm with epicondylar view in Non navigated knees. Postoperative TEA was assessed by taking CT scan, measuring condylar twist angle and posterior condylar angle (PCA). Results:. The mean PCA was around 4° with TEA as reference in Navigated and 6° in Non navigated knees and only 7% patients required an additional lateral release of which 2% patient had preop patellar maltracking. No postoperative patellar maltracking was seen. Anterior knee pain was present in 10% patients. No postop infection is noted. Alignment ranging from 4° to 8° external rotation. Conclusion:. Navigation is most accurate measure for TEA as reference, as compared to non navigated TKA, which can lead to excessive external rotation especially in severely deformed knees

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the TEA. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal. Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise. The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration. Given these ideals, to what extent are patients improved? The concept of reproducing bony anatomy is based on the pretext that form will dictate function, such that normal-leaning anatomy will tend towards normal-leaning kinematics. Therefore, we seek to evaluate knee function based on objective assessments of movement or kinematics. The use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of post-operative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality