Gram staining is used as an initial indicator of synovial joint infection but has widely varied false negative rates in the literature. Clinical decisions are often made on the basis of gram stain results, such as whether a patient requires urgent surgery, and therefore it is important to understand the tests efficacy. A retrospective review of synovial fluid aspirates in NHS Tayside for the years 2017 and 2018 was performed from the departmental microbiology database. Aspirates of large joints were included (hip, knee, shoulder, wrist, elbow, ankle). Any joints with prosthesis were excluded, including fixation metalwork. Any abscess overlying a joint that was not proven to penetrate the joint was also excluded. Initial gram stain results and formal culture results were reviewed. Final culture results were considered to be the gold standard to compare gram stain results to. 2167 samples were reviewed. Of these 1552 were excluded base on inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 615, 120 (19.5%) were culture positive. There were 33 positive gram stain results, 1 false positive and 32 true positive results. The sensitivity was 26.67% with a specificity of 99.80% (p=0.0001). The negative predictive value is 84.88% (CI 83.44% – 86.21%). These results show that gram stain tests of native joints have a low sensitivity and poor negative predictive value. This is reflected in the current literature with prosthetic joints. Based on this study caution should be used when interpreting a negative gram stain result with appropriate safety netting and follow up required alongside clinical assessment

Aims

Monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) or neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are useful for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but their diagnostic values are unclear for screening fixation-related infection (FRI) in patients for whom conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) is planned after failed internal fixation for femoral neck fracture.

Introduction. Microbiological diagnosis of bone and joint infections (BJIs) currently relies on standard cultures which are time consuming and lack sensitivity. Various molecular approaches have been described and allowed improvement of BJI diagnosis. This study evaluated for the first time the performance of a DNA microarray-based assay (Prove-it™ Sepsis assay, PISA) for the rapid (<6 hours) detection and identification of 50 different species involved in BJI directly from clinical samples. Material and methods. We retrospectively selected 130 bone and joint samples (67 synovial fluids and 63 bone biopsies) including 114 positive and 16 negative samples. The microbiological diagnosis had been previously established either by culture(C+, n=53) or by PCR16S and sequencing when culture was negative (C-/PCR+). The positive samples were selected to match the species targeted on the DNA microarray. DNA extraction was performed before proceeding to PISA amplification and hybridization on every selected sample. Results. Among the 16 negative samples, one was detected positive with S. epidermidis by PISA, result that was secondarily confirmed using specific PCR. Among the 114 positive samples, 62.3% were positive using PISA with highly concordant identification compared to culture and PCR16S/sequencing results. Forty-three samples (37.7%) remained negative, illustrating a defect of sensitivity. However, PISA accurately detected methicillin resistance not only among the 16 C+/PISA+ Staphylococcus species (n=5) but also among the 28 C-/PCR16S+ Staphylococcus species (n=12) offering crucial rapid information to adapt the treatment of staphylococcal BJIs. Seven polymicrobial samples were also identified without extensive experiments. Discussion – Conclusion. Even if the sensitivity deserves to be improved by optimizing DNA extraction and investigating on human DNA interference, these preliminary promising results highlight that this new and simple microarray method could be in the future an alternative to conventional PCR16S for the diagnosis of BJI

INTRODUCTION. The advantages of large diameter metal on metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty are decreased wear rate, preservation of bone stock, anatomical restoration and enhanced stability. Large amounts of metal wear particles and metal ions are released which may induce adverse reactions including local soft tissue toxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, bone loss and risk of carcinogenesis. Aseptic loosening can be the result of a peri-prosthetic osteolysis generated as a result of a biological response to particulate wear debris. No reports in the literature exist as to whether circulating levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) decrease upon removal of a symptomatic large diameter MoM implant or whether levels remain high due to the effect of metal ions debris left behind in the soft tissues after revision surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Between June 2006 and June 2009 we undertook 44 revision surgeries of both large head MoM THAs (femoral head diameter 38mm) and metal-on-metal hip resurfacings for suspected metallosis. Mean time from original implant to revision was 4 years, 8 months (1yr 4mo–7yr 9mo). The mean follow up evaluation was 2 years and 2 months (1yr 2mo–4 years). Blood samples were taken for whole blood Cr and serum Co according to a recognised protocol and compared with reference levels indicated by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency recommendation of less than 7ppb for Cr (130nM/L) and Co (119nM/L). RESULTS. 42 patients were found to have histological evidence of either metal allergy, metal toxicity or foreign body reaction. 2 patients had evidence of infection with no features of metal reaction. 3 patients suffered early dislocation requiring closed reduction. 1 patient had infective complications necessitating Girdlestones. 11 patients were lost to follow up, 8 patients were diagnosed pre operatively on Co and Cr levels in urine or synovial fluid aspirate alone. 23 patients had pre revision blood or serum metal ion level results available for direct comparison. Median serum Co level pre revision was 176.6nM/L, falling post revision to 5.1nM/L (p=<0.001∗). The median whole blood Cr level pre revision was 117nM/L and 19nm/L post revision (p=<0.001∗). Mean Oxford Hip Score was 23.7. DISCUSSION. This study demonstrates that at greater than one year post removal of a large diameter MoM hip implant for the indication of symptomatic metallosis or metal hypersensitivity, metal ion levels fall to almost normal levels and that outcome of revision surgery in terms of patient satisfaction is not adversely affected

Objectives

Osteochondral injuries, if not treated adequately, often lead to severe osteoarthritis. Possible treatment options include refixation of the fragment or replacement therapies such as Pridie drilling, microfracture or osteochondral grafts, all of which have certain disadvantages. Only refixation of the fragment can produce a smooth and resilient joint surface. The aim of this study was the evaluation of an ultrasound-activated bioresorbable pin for the refixation of osteochondral fragments under physiological conditions.