The standard approach is through the deltopectoral interval. Among patients with prior incisions, one makes every effort to either utilise the old incision or to incorporate it into a longer incision that will allow one to approach the deltopectoral interval and retract the deltoid laterally. The deltopectoral interval is most easily developed just distal to the clavicle, where there is a natural infraclavicular triangle of fat that separates the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles even in very scarred or stiff shoulders. Typically, the deltoid is retracted laterally leaving the cephalic vein on the medial aspect of the exposure. The anterior border of the deltoid is mobilised from the clavicle to its insertion on the humerus. The anterior portion of the deltoid insertion together with the more distal periosteum of the humerus may be elevated slightly. The next step is to identify the plane between the conjoined tendon group and the subscapularis muscle. Dissection in this area must be done very carefully due to the close proximity of the neurovascular group, the axillary nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve. Scar is then released from around the base of the coracoid. The subacromial space is freed of scar and the shoulder is examined for range of motion. Particularly among patients with prior rotator cuff surgery, there may be severe scarring in the subacromial space. Internal rotation of the arm with dissection between the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid is critical to develop this plane. If external rotation is less than 30 degrees, one can consider incising the subscapularis off bone rather than through its tendinous substance. For every 1 cm that the subscapularis is advanced medially, one gains approximately 20 to 30 degrees of external rotation. The rotator interval between the subscapularis and supraspinatus is then incised. This release is then continued inferiorly to incise the inferior shoulder capsule from the neck of the humerus. This is performed by proceeding from anterior to posterior with progressive external rotation of the humerus staying directly on the bone with electrocautery and great care to protect the axillary nerve. The key for glenoid exposure as well as improvement in motion is deltoid mobilization, a large inferior capsular release, aggressive humeral head cut and osteophyte removal

Aims

Open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF) for displaced proximal humerus fractures can achieve reliably good long-term outcomes. However, a minority of patients have persistent pain and stiffness after surgery and may benefit from open arthrolysis, subacromial decompression, and removal of metalwork (ADROM). The long-term results of ADROM remain unknown; we aimed to assess outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure for stiffness following ORPF, and assess predictors of poor outcome.

Aims

Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE.

Purpose: The results of coracoid blocks for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability are satisfactory (SOFCOT 1991 and 1999). Little work has been devoted to complications of this operation. We report our results after surgical revision in a consecutive series of seventeen patients. Material and methods: Fourteen men and three women, mean age 34 years, required a second interention after anterior coracoid block: for recurent instability in ten cases and for painful stiff shoulder in seven. Radiographic assessment demonstrated a conflict between the block and/or the screw with the humeral head in 13 cases and signs of joint degeneration in three. The block was malpositioned in eight shoulders. The stabilisation procedure (Bankart ± capsuloplasty) was performed for these unstable shoulders with debridement and removal of the screw and or the block for painful stiff shoulders. The subscapular tendon was normal preoperatively in two shoulders, fibrous or thin in eleven and torn in one. The time from the first operation to revision was eleven years on the average. Results: At mean follow-up of 21 months, the patients were assessed with the Duplay score. Results were good or excellent for eleven patients (70% for stabilised unstable shoulders and 57% for debrided painful stiff shoulders), fair for four and poor for two. Clinical assessment of the subscapular demonstrated a deficiency in ten shoulders. The force of internal rotation of the operated shoulder was 3.3 kg less than for the controlateral shoulder. Computed tomography demonstrated significant fatty degeneration of the subscapular in four patients. Glenohumeral joint degeneration was observed in nine shoulders. The most significant prognostic factor for final outcome was the number of prior interventions (p< 0.01). Discussion: The result of revision surgery after coarcoid block depends on the clinical presentation. While the results for painful stiff shoulders remained very limited due to frequent intra-articular lesions, adjunction of a capsuloplasty with or without reinsertion of the glenoid rim yielded satsifactory results in more than two-thrids of the unstable shoulders. Involvement of the subscapular muscle appears to be related to multiple interventions in these shoulders, as well as to the deleterious effect of the block (Picard 1998, Glasson 1999) and continues to be the crucial prognostic factor for final outcome

Subacromial bursa fibrosis are linked to rotator cuff lesion with shoulder stiffness; however, the mechanism underlying this shoulder disorder remain elusive. MicroRNA-29s (miR-29s) are emerging fibrosis inhibitor targeting fibrogenic matrices during tissue fibrosis. This study is aimed to investigate clinical relevance and function of miR-29 signalling to subacromial bursa homeostasis in shoulder stiffness. Subacromial bursa in patients with rotator cuff lesion with or without shoulder stiffness who required open acromioplasty were harvested for assessing fibrosis histopathology using Manson's trichrome staining. Expressions of proinflammatory cytokines, fibrotic matrices, and miR-29s were quantified using RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. Range of motion and pain scores of the stiffness group were higher than those of non-stiffness group. Upregulated proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and fibrotic matrices (collagen 1α1, 3α1, and 4α1) but decreased miR-29a and b expression existed in the stiffness group. Affected tissues exhibited severe fibrotic matrix accumulation, synovial hyperangiogenesis, hyperplasia, and strong miR-29a transcripts. In vitro, IL-1β rather than IL-6 and TNF-α decreased miR-29a expression of subacromial bursa fibroblasts. miR-29a knockdown escalated fibrotic matrix expression, whereas forced miR-29a expression alleviated the IL-1β-induced fibrotic matrix expression. Of interest, miR-29a transgenic mice displayed moderate responses to supraspinatus and infraspinatus tenotomy-induce fibrosis and gait irregularity of affected shoulders. Weak miR-29 signalling causes excessive fibrosis and remodelling in subacromial bursa and ultimately increases the prevalence of shoulder stiffness. This study reveals a new mechanistic underlying shoulder stiffness and highlights that sustained miR-29a potentially ameliorates the severity and function of stiff shoulder

The April 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Arthroscopic Bankart repair in athletes: in it for the long run?; Functional outcomes and the Wrightington classification of elbow fracture-dislocations; Hemiarthroplasty or ORIF intra-articular distal humerus fractures in older patients; Return to sport after total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty; Readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty; Arthroscopic Bankart repair in the longer term; Bankart repair with(out) remplissage or the Latarjet procedure? A systematic review and meta-analysis; Regaining motion among patients with shoulder pathology: are all exercises equal?

Peri-prosthetic fractures around implants in the proximal humerus can present substantial challenges. Most individuals who undergo upper limb arthroplasty tend to be osteopenic to begin with, and the anatomy of the proximal humerus does not provide an excess of bone to work with. Therefore, peri-prosthetic fractures pose difficulties to rotator cuff function and implant stability. There are multiple classification systems, but series are small and the classification does not always lead to treatment algorithms. Risk factors for humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty include endosteal notching, cortical perforation, varus malalignment, stem perforation, ipsilateral shoulder and elbow arthroplasties, and loose stems. Many of these risk factors are directly related to technical errors at the time of surgery. Poor exposure can lead to aberrant starting point and errors in reaming. Oversized prostheses can lead to cortical perforation or even stem perforation. Proper positioning of the patient on the table and surgical releases help avoid these technical errors. Peri-prosthetic fractures should be carefully evaluated radiographically for stability. Two important considerations: 1. Is the implant stable? 2. Is the fracture stable? Generally, if the implant is unstable, the implant must be revised. In the setting of a stable implant, many humeral fractures can be treated nonoperatively. Many fractures at or below the level of the tip of the implant can be treated as typical humeral fractures. Options for fixation include plates with cables or long stem prostheses which bypass the fracture. Displaced tuberosity fractures are treated with suture or wire fixation. Risk factors for a poor outcome include increased time to union, skin breakdown, and stiff shoulder

We report the results of a method of reconstructing massive rotator cuff (RC) tears and reinforcing the repaired RC tendons with re-tensioning of the cuff to effect reconstruction of tears which were previously considered non-repairable. Methods A consecutive series of 37 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 61 years (range 45–80) are reported. Mean duration of pre-op symptoms was 19 (4–36) months and the mean pre-op Constant Score (CS) was 41. Insertion involved anchoring the device to the undersurface of the retracted RC tendon with Ethibond sutures, passing the other end of the device through a tunnel under the greater tuberosity and anchoring the device, under tension, to the proximal humerus with 1 or 2 screws. The proximal fixation is similar to “spot-welding” while the distal fixation is a “flexible plate” fixation. Results The follow-up mean CS (minimum 10/12 post-op) was 54. There has been one deep infection. Two had MRI confirmed re-rupture of the RC. One case of a stiff shoulder required manipulation. This embroidered polyester augmentation device is resistant to re-tears and integrates well with medium term re-centering of the humeral head which had been superiorly displaced pre-op

Purpose of the study: A stiff shoulder in internal rotation is a classical complication of obstetrical injury to the brachial plexus. The condition generally associates glenohumeral dysplasia. In 2003, Pearl proposed arthroscopic release of the shoulder, with or without latissimus dorsi transfer as an alternative to an open procedure. We report a series of 13 patients who underwent this procedure. Material and method: From 2004 to 2007, 13 children aged 1 to 11 years (range 3.5) underwent surgery. The procedure was an arthroscopic tenotomy of the intra-articular portion of the subscapularis associated with release of the anterior capsuloligament structures without tendon transfer. A thoracobrachial resin cast maintained the shoulder in maximal external rotation for six weeks. The functional outcome was assessed on the basis of the passive and active range of motion and the Mallet score. Pre and postoperative MRI was used to assess glenohumeral dysplasia and check its correction. Results: Mean follow-up was 23 months (range 5–40). There were no complications. Mean immediate postoperative gain was 53 (range 30–70) for external rotation (RE1). On average, passive RE1 improved from −5.4 to +57.7. Eight patients (61%) recovered active external rotation (57.5 on average). Mean active abduction improved from 45.8 to 56.5. Active internal rotation declined in 38% of the shoulders. The Mallet score improved in 69% of the shoulders. The best results were observed for children aged less than 4 years. There was one failure, related to major dyplasia which could not be reduced with an open procedure. Correction of the glenohumeral dysplasia was noted on 7 of the 9 MRI performed and the retroversion angle of the glenoid improved from −28.2 to −25.6, on average. Discussion: Open techniques are aggressive and only variably effective. A majority of our patients (8/13) achieved improved passive and active RE1 solely with the arthroscopic procedure. Correction of the glenohumeral dysplasia with growth appears to correspond to the clinical improvement but further follow-up is needed. Conclusion: Our results are comparable with those reported by Pearl. This is a minimally invasive easy-to-perform technique. For children aged less than 4 years, systematic tendon transfer does not appear to be necessary

Introduction: We have described nine clinical features to aid the clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder. These include symptoms of pain and pins and needles radiating down the arm to the hand, feeling of lameness in the arm, tenderness over medial border of scapula, tenderness over the rotator interval, tenderness over the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular fossa, reduction of pain with passive abduction and forward flexion of the shoulder, asymmetry of the arm position at rest with an increase in elbow to waist distance and apparent winging of the scapula. Methods: We prospectively evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of each clinical test in a consecutive series of 110 patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder. An equal number of patients with shoulder pathology other than frozen shoulder were used as controls matched to the study group for sex and age. We also discuss the probable causes and clinical relevance of these features. Results The most sensitive test was pain over the brachial p:lexus in the supraclavicular fossa (0.98) and the most specific test was apparent winging of the scapula (0.84). The single most accurate diagnostic test was relief of symptoms with abduction and flexion (85%). The incidence of positive accessory features was positively correlated with the visual analogue pain score (p< 0.0001, Spearman rank correlation coefficient) and negatively correlated with the length of duration of symptoms (p< 0.0001, Spearman rank correlation coefficient). Conclusion: These accessory tests are intended to supplement the original description made by Codman. They are most useful in the acute painful stage of the disease when symptoms have been present for less than 6 months. In the diagnosis of a patient with a painful stiff shoulder, if six of the tests with the highest correlation are positive, the diagnosis of frozen shoulder is likely

Aim: To describe the technique and the mid term results of anterior shoulder instability arthroscopic reconstruction. Patients-methods: Between March and December 2000 29 patients-28 males with ages ranging between 19–29 years (mean age 23 y.) and 1 female 24 years old-underwent arthroroscopic stabilization of anterior shoulder instability. During the procedure the anterior-inferior part of the labrum was reattached to the glenoid using bioabsorbable and metallic suture anchors. In selected patients in which capsule plication after anchors’ insertion was insufficient additional capsular shrikange or/and rotators’ interval closure was also performed. Results: Postoperatively patient evaluation took place using Rowe-Zarins scale. According to this score 22 patients (75,9%) had excellent or very good outcome. Three (3) patients (10,35%) were lost during follow up while 1 (3,45%) died. From the remaining 25 patients 2 had recurrence of the instability (6.9%) and in 1 patient (3,45%) a stiff shoulder was noticed and arthroscopically resolved. Finally a disengaged metallic suture anchor was noticed incidentally during routine radiographic examination in one patient (3,45%).The anchor was successfully removed under arthroscopic visualization without compromising the final outcome. Conclusions: Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior shoulder instability when precisely performed after correct patient selection is an effective technique achieving results comparable to those of traditional open procedures

Introduction: Shoulder arthroplasty is generally a successful procedure. However, in a small percentage excessive pain or limitation of motion, does occur. We examine the role of arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Methods and Results: Between 1995–2000, 29 patients who had excessive pain or limitation of motion following arthroplasty underwent arthroscopy. Time between procedures was 37.3 months (range 4–95). Impingement syndrome confirmed and successfully treated by ASD in 10, a rotator cuff tear in 3. Loose bodies removed in 1. Arthroscopic washout was performed in 1 patient for acute septic joint. 6 of 7 with capsular fibrosis underwent a successful arthroscopic capsular release. Loose or worn components were found in 4, a florid synovitis in 1, loose cement in another and in 1 no abnormality could be found. Discussion: Arthroscopy is a useful tool for diagnosis and treatment of painful or stiff shoulder arthroplasty. However, it leads to a number of technical difficulties. Orientation within the joint is often hindered as the reflection from the prosthesis makes it difficult to differentiate between the real and mirror images of the tissues and arthroscopic instruments. Access is often compromised in stiff shoulders. Conclusion: Arthroscopy following shoulder arthroplasty is useful for the diagnosis and treatment of pain and loss of motion in selected patients, but can be technically difficult. Diagnostic arthroscopy following shoulder arthroplasty should be considered for patients suffering from pain in whom no cause could be found using less invasive investigations

Aim: Distal clavicle excision (DCE) is the treatment of choice for A–C joint arthritis.The overall complication rate for open, isolated DCE is higher than previously reported. Distal clavicle excision (DCE) is the treatment of choice for A–C joint arthritis. Isolated DCE., as an open procedure has been considered to be a safe procedure, and it is the gold standard for comparison for arthroscopic distal clavicle excision. This study attempts to define the incidence of complications after isolated, open DCE. Materials & Methods: This prospective, non-randomized study included 702 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder. 580 patients were included in the control group. All patients underwent a thorough preoperative evaluation and final diagnosis was given after arthroscopic evaluation. There were 42 patients with isolated A–C joint arthritis, which underwent an open D.C.E. Mean follow up was 16.7 months. There were 30 men and 12 women with a mean age of 42,6 (± 12,5) years. The dominant arm was involved in 30 patients. 16 patients participated in sports while 9 of them were competitive athletes. 38 (90%) patients had symptomatic arthritis, 2(5%) cases were of osteolysis and separation arthritis each. Results: 22 (52%) of the 42 patients developed complications. There were 2 deep infections and 2 stitches abscesses. 4 (9.5%) patients developed a stiff shoulder and 1(2.4%) patient developed heterotopic ossification. 16 (38%) patients had tenderness in A–C joint for a period over 3 months while 6 (14%) patients had local tenderness at the last follow up. Painful scar was present in 2 (5%) patients over 3 months. Conclusions: The overall complication rate for open, isolated DCE is higher than previously reported. Patients should be advised of these possibilities and this study serves as a baseline for comparison for future study

Purpose. Electrothermal arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy (ETAC) was a technology introduced for orthopaedic surgery without good scientific clinical evidence supporting its use. This multicentre randomized clinical trial provides the scientific clinical evidence comparing ETAC to Open Inferior Capsular Shift (ICS), by measuring disease-specific quality of life at 2-years post-operatively, in patients with shoulder instability due to capsular redundancy. Method. Fifty-four subjects (37 females and 17 males; mean age 23.3 years (SD = 6.9; 15–44 years) with multidirectional instability (MDI) or multidirectional laxity with antero-inferior instability (MDL-AII) were randomized intra-operatively to ETAC (n = 28) or Open ICS (n = 26) using concealed envelopes, computer-generated, variable block randomization with stratification by surgeon and type of instability. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index is a quality of life outcome measure that is scored on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents better quality of life. Two functional assessments included the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) Score and the Constant Score. Post-operative recurrent instability and surgical time were also measured. Analyses included ANOVA of repeated measures with Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons, Chi-square and independent t-tests (p < 0.05). Results. At 2-years post-operatively, mean WOSI scores were not statistically different between the groups (p=0.61): ETAC = 74 (SD = 24; 95% CI = 64 84); Open ICS = 77 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 68 86). There was no difference between groups for mean ASES scores (p=0.34): ETAC = 81 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 73 90); Open ICS = 87 (SD = 18; 95% CI = 79 95), mean Constant scores (p = 0.35): ETAC = 83 (SD = 7; 95% CI = 80 86); Open ICS = 85 (SD = 11; 95% CI = 80 − 90), and recurrent instability (p = 0.41): ETAC = 2; Open ICS = 4. Mean surgical time was 23 minutes for ETAC and 59 minutes for Open ICS (p = 0.00). Three subjects (1 ETAC, 2 Open ICS) had stiff shoulders; however, no major complications were observed. Conclusion. Patient outcomes improved from baseline to all follow-up periods. There was no difference between the ETAC and Open ICS groups in quality of life, functional outcomes, and recurrent instability at 2 years post-operatively

Purpose of the study: Fragile bone and weak soft tissues can create a serious challenge for arthroplasty of the rheumatoid arthritis shoulder. Patients seen late after rotator cuff tears become irreparable may also present a stiff shoulder, further complicating the procedure. Material and methods: The purpose of this study was to assess outcome at more than five years in a prospective series of 12 patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder with an irreparable rotator cuff tear treated with a hemiarthroplasty with a mobile cup. The radiological and clinical results were compared with those obtained in a control series of ten bipolar humeral prostheses implanted for centered or excentered degenerative disease with irreparable cuff tears. Results: The mean preoperative Constant score was 16.9 points: pain 2.5, activity 4.2, active mobility 9.5, strength 0.7. Active ROM was 63.8° for anterior elevation, 45° for abduction, and 12° for external rotation. At last follow-up, the mean postoperative Constant score was 39.4 points: pain 10.7, activity 10.8, active mobility 13.8, strength 4.1. Mean active anterior elevation was 83.7°, abduction 70.4°, and external rotation 29.1°. Outcome was not significantly different from the control group with degenerative joint disease (p< 0.05). Discussion: The overall Constant score, especially the pain score, was significantly improved (p< 0.05). Improvement in joint motion was modest but comparable with other series in the literature and even better than with conventional hemiarthroplasty for the same indication. There were few complications, mainly superior subluxation favored by the preoperative infra-scapularis or infraspinatus tears. Glenoid wear was significant despite the dual mobility concept. There were no cases of loosening. Conclusion: These results show that hemiarthroplasty with a mobile cut provides acceptable mid-term results for the advanced-stage rheumatoid shoulder with an irreparable rotator cuff tear. Results in this series were comparable with that in the control group of patients with degenerative joint disease. Consequently, the status of the rotator cuff appears to be more important that the inflammatory or degenerative etiology. Certain cuff tears involving the infrascapularis raise the risk of superoanterior instability and could be a limitation for this method. A more constrained prosthesis might be advisable

Purpose: We report the satisfactory results obtained in a retrospecive multicentric series of 80 shoulder prostheses implanted for aseptic osetonecrosis of the head of the humerus. Material and methods: Seventy-four patients (43 men, 31 women, men age 59 years) with aseptic osteonecrosis of the head of the humerus treated with a shoulder prosthesis were reviewed at least two years after surgery. The mean weighted score before surgery was 37%. Twenty-six total prostheses and 54 humeral prostheses were implanted via the deltopectoral approach. There had been few complications at review: seven stiff shoulders, one torn suture of the subscapularis with instability, two inflammatory glenoids, one migration. Physical exam and x-ray (ossifications, lucent lines) findings were recorded. Results: Mean follow-up was 47 months (24–104 months). The Constant score was improved significantly (p < 0.05). The total weighed score was 88% on the average and was not affected by gender, side, or dominant side. Ninety percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. Gain in motion was significant in all movements with a mean 53° for active anterior elevation. For grade V shoulders, the improvement was significantly better with total shoulder arthroplasty while for grade II and III shoulders a humeral prosthesis was preferable. Full thickness tears of the rotator tendons did not influence overall outcome despite less recovery of motion (p < 0.05) and force (p = 0.09). Complications did not alter results. Discussion: A humeral prosthesis should be preferred for grade II–III shoulders and a total shoulder arthroplasty for major degeneration of the glenoid (grade V). For grade IV, either prosthesis may be used depending on the patient’s age, activity level, and status of the rotator cuff. For very young or very old patients, high levels of physical activity may argue against prosthesis implantation due to the risk of loosening or rotator cuff tears which are unfavourable factors. Conclusion: The results of this multicentric series corroborate data in the literature that shoulder arthroplasty provides good results for the treatment of aseptic necrosis of the head of the humerus. In generally, arthroplasty allows pain relief, good motion, particularly for external rotation, and good force recovery, explaining the better results obtained in active younger subjects

Ultrasound screening has shown that the shoulder joint is almost always involved in rheumatoid arthritis. But only few of rheumatoid patients suffering from omarthritis are in considerable pain. Loss of strength and mobility is often compensated by the adjacent joints. Low patients demands, as pain and swelling can be treated often temporarely successfully by corticoid injections and the need of a wide exposure of the shoulder joint when performing an open synovectomy are the reasons of the low rate of synovectomies performed in rheumatoid shoulder joints. The clinical outcome after synovectomies in rheumatoid omarthritis is generally superior to those of knee synovectomies and shows a reliable reduction of pain, swelling and an increase of ROM. The surgical trauma in open synovectomy of the shoulder results in an impairment of the complex muscle co-ordination of the shoulder and a painful long-lasting aftertreatment. This disadvantages can be prevented when using arthroscopic techniques. The advantages of the arthroscopic technique are mostly obvious in the shoulder joint. The reduced surgical trauma of the periarticular tissue leaving the proprioreception intact results in reduced postoperative pain, allowing early mobilisation and shorter rehabilitation. Arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder is performed with the patient in beach- chair position under general anesthesia. We use a standard 5mm arthroscope and a motorised synovial resector. To prevent bleeding it is advantageous to utilise cooled non-ionic irrigation solution with epinephrin in addition pressurised by a roller pump. Synovectomy of the glenohumeral joint and of the subacromial bursa is performed via four portals. Potential hazards like injury to the periarticular vessels and nerves or damage of the joint cartilage especially in stiff shoulders can only be prevented with careful proceeding. Active and passive physiotherapy starts on the first postoperative day. Our first series of 12 shoulder arthroscopies done 1989–1991 was followed 3. 8 years postoperatively. Swelling and pain at rest disappeared rapidly after surgery. Pain during motion took longer to subside. At the end of follow-up patients reported slight pain on motion in five shoulders. Postoperatively all patients reported improvement of pain. There was one recurrence of swelling due to bursitis. In this patient no bursectomy was done during shoulder arthroscopy, which is now done as a routine. There was subjectively and objectively an increase of strength postoperatively. ROM showed immediate postoperative improvement, although a slight reduction was noticed during the follow-up period. In 1990–1999 we performed 52 arthroscopical synovectomies of rheumatoid shoulders. 31 shoulders could be followed by questionnaire at a mean of 6. 5years postoperatively. Pain at rest and pain on motion was improved in about 80% and 74% respectively. Recurrence of swelling was reported by 26% of the patients. Five patients has to be operated again. The clinical outcome compare favourably with the results published about open shoulder synovectomy. Five patients with large humeral cysts were treated with arthroscopic synovectomy, arthroscopically assisted curettage and bone grafting of the cyst via a small incision at the major tuberculum. Until now none of the patients suffered from humeral collaps, no shoulder has to be replaced. In painful rheumatoid omarthritis swelling and pain can be improved reliably with arthroscopic synovectomy. The reduced surgical trauma of minimal invasive synovectomy should raise the rate of early preventive surgery

BACKGROUND. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) provides an alternative to standard total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of selected complex shoulder problems including failed shoulder replacements. The purpose of this report is to present outcome of RTSA using Comprehensive Reverse System (CRS) as either primary or revision treatment choice. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS. Between September 2010 and April 2012, 54 patients (36 females, 18 males) with the mean age of 68.4 (±10) underwent RTSA-CRS. In 27 patients RTSA-CRS was performed as a revision due to failed previous arthroplasty. Primary underlying conditions included AVN (2), massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (2), primary osteoarthritis (7), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (2), rheumatoid arthritis (6), and rotator cuff arthropathy (8). It was not possible to complete the operation in 6 patients (4 revisions group 2 AVN cases) due to substantial glenoid erosion. Preoperative CT scan was performed in 50% of patients to assess the bony stock of the glenoid. In some patients ultrasound and MRI were performed to acquire additional information. A total of 46 patients were followed-up by means of antroposterior and axial plain X-rays, pain and satisfaction level (VAS/0–10), stiffness, Constant Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, SF-12 (Physical and mental Subscales), and range of movement for a mean duration of 6.5 months (±4.2). RESULTS. The table presents the pre- and postoperative outcome variables for both primary and revision RTSA-CRS groups. The majority of outcome measures indicated a considerable improvement in both groups during the short term follow-up. Significant correlations were noted in-between some key outcome variables. However; due to the short period of follow-up and continuity of collecting data, we intend to produce a more realistic picture of the results s and outcome of the RTSA-CRS in coming years. COMPLICATIONS. There was no vascular complication. Disassociation of glenosphere from the base-plate happened in one patient 8 weeks post-op due to technical mistake, this was repaired later with a satisfactory outcome. One case had enormous hematoma formation 72 hours post-op due to anticoagulants administration leading to second stage evacuation and increased stiffness of shoulder. One patient sustained deltoid partial rupture due to recurrent falls and managed by conservatively. Another patient sustained a type C periprosthetic fracture and was later revised to custom-made stem prosthesis. CONCLUSION. The results of this short-term report indicate a satisfactory and acceptable outcome for RTSA-CRS as reflected in the assessment tools in both primary and revision cases, however with superior results in the primary group. Long-term follow-up is essential to have a more rational assessment of the clinical outcome as well as associated complications