Abstract
BACKGROUND
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) provides an alternative to standard total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of selected complex shoulder problems including failed shoulder replacements. The purpose of this report is to present outcome of RTSA using Comprehensive Reverse System (CRS) as either primary or revision treatment choice.
PATIENTS AND MATERIALS
Between September 2010 and April 2012, 54 patients (36 females, 18 males) with the mean age of 68.4 (±10) underwent RTSA-CRS. In 27 patients RTSA-CRS was performed as a revision due to failed previous arthroplasty. Primary underlying conditions included AVN (2), massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (2), primary osteoarthritis (7), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (2), rheumatoid arthritis (6), and rotator cuff arthropathy (8). It was not possible to complete the operation in 6 patients (4 revisions group 2 AVN cases) due to substantial glenoid erosion. Preoperative CT scan was performed in 50% of patients to assess the bony stock of the glenoid. In some patients ultrasound and MRI were performed to acquire additional information. A total of 46 patients were followed-up by means of antroposterior and axial plain X-rays, pain and satisfaction level (VAS/0–10), stiffness, Constant Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, SF-12 (Physical and mental Subscales), and range of movement for a mean duration of 6.5 months (±4.2).
RESULTS
The table presents the pre- and postoperative outcome variables for both primary and revision RTSA-CRS groups. The majority of outcome measures indicated a considerable improvement in both groups during the short term follow-up. Significant correlations were noted in-between some key outcome variables. However; due to the short period of follow-up and continuity of collecting data, we intend to produce a more realistic picture of the results s and outcome of the RTSA-CRS in coming years.
COMPLICATIONS
There was no vascular complication. Disassociation of glenosphere from the base-plate happened in one patient 8 weeks post-op due to technical mistake, this was repaired later with a satisfactory outcome. One case had enormous hematoma formation 72 hours post-op due to anticoagulants administration leading to second stage evacuation and increased stiffness of shoulder. One patient sustained deltoid partial rupture due to recurrent falls and managed by conservatively. Another patient sustained a type C periprosthetic fracture and was later revised to custom-made stem prosthesis.
CONCLUSION
The results of this short-term report indicate a satisfactory and acceptable outcome for RTSA-CRS as reflected in the assessment tools in both primary and revision cases, however with superior results in the primary group. Long-term follow-up is essential to have a more rational assessment of the clinical outcome as well as associated complications.
