Introduction. Short stems have been developed for some years for preservation of femoral bone stock and achieve physiological proximal loading. Shortening stem length is a merit for bone stock preservation. However, it might lead to reduction of primary stability. We investigated relationship between stem length and primary stability by patient specific finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods. Thirty-one hips in 31 patients were performed total hip arthroplasty with standard length tapered wedge-shaped (TW) cementless stem (CTi-II: Corin, Cirencester, UK). There were 6 males and 25 females. The average age at operation was 69 years old. The average body mass index was 23.9 kg/m2. Primary diagnoses were secondary osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip in 29 hips. Femoral canal shapes were normal in 21, stovepipe in 6 and champagne-flute in 4 hips. Bone qualities were type A in 6, B in 19 and C in 6 hips. The patients underwent computed tomography (CT) preoperatively and postoperatively. We constructed preoperative three dimensional (3D) femur surface models from preoperative CT data with individual bone mineral density (BMD) mapping. The postoperative 3D femur and rough stem surface models were obtained from postoperative CT data. The coordinates of the postoperative femur were transformed to fit the preoperative femur model. A precise stem model constructed using computer-assisted design data was matched to the transformed rough stem model using the iterative closest point algorithm. We obtained a patient-specific model with the proximal bone geometry, allocation of BMD and stem alignment. We estimated the average of axial and rotational micromotion (MM) at stem-bone interface and the ratio of area (MM â�¦ 40 micrometers) on the porous surface in order to analyze primary stability of TW stem with several lengths (standard (100 %), 75 %, 50 %, 40 % and 30 % length). Results. The average MM in standard length stem was 14.3 micrometers and the ratio of area with MM â�¦ 40 micrometers was 97.9 %. The average of axial and rotational MM in shorter length (75 %) stem were respectively 9.7, 8.3 micrometers. There were no differences in the average of axial and rotational MM between standard and shorter (75 %) length stems. MM at the porous surface was increased as the stem length grew shorter. The ratio of area with MM â�¦ 40 micrometers on the porous surface were reduced by 50 to 80 % in −40 % or less length stem, comparing with the standard length stem. Discussion and Conclusion. The present FEA on the stem length and MM demonstrated that primary stability in 40 % or less short length TW stem was extensively reduced, which might lead to failure of bone ingrowth on the porous surface and early loosening. Shortening of stem length less than 50 % is a risk for reduced primary stability in TW stem

Introduction. Excellent long-term survival rates associated with the absence of stem subsidence have been achieved with total hip arthroplasty (THA) using femoral components cemented line-to-line (“French Paradox”). Recently, short stems have been introduced in order to preserve diaphyseal bone and to accommodate to minimal invasive THA and a variety of clinical situations. The aim of the current study was to quantify the rotational and tilting stability of a Kerboull stem of varying length after line-to-line cementation using a validated in-vitro model. Materials & methods. The femoral component made of M30NW stainless steel was derived from the original Kerboull stem. It had a double taper, a highly polished surface, and a quadrangular cross-section. Four stem lengths were designed from the original length with a distal reduction of 6, 12, 17 and 22%, whereas the proximal body geometry of the implant remained unaffected. For each stem length, five specimens were implanted into a non-canal synthetic femoral model. The femoral preparation was performed in order to obtain rotational and tilting stability of the stem prior to the line-to-line cementation. Spatial micro-motions of the specimens were investigated using a validated rotational measuring set-up. In addition, in a second separate step, the specimens were exposed to a ventro-dorsal moment to mimic varus-valgus moment. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with Fisher PLSD. Results. The maximum torque transfer from the stem within the cement mantle to the composite femur occurred at the level of the lesser trochanter, whereas the lowest torque transfer was observed at the tip of the stem. The relative movement at the tip was significantly greater for the original length when compared to 6 and 12% length reduction (p = 0.036 and 0.033, respectively). The 12% reduction resulted in a significant lower mean overall movement when compared to the original length (p = 0.044). The tilting behavior according to the stem lengths indicated that proximal bending value was significantly increased for 17% reduction when compared to 6% and 12% reduction (p = 0.035 and 0.032, respectively). Bending of the tip of the stem was in the same direction as the shoulder, indicating a backlash from the tip. At the tip, relative bending was increased when compared to the previous length up to 12% reduction and then decreased. However, the difference was not significant (p <0.05). Discussion & conclusion. The stem lengths evaluated in the current study showed similar results to previously reported cemented stems of different designs, indicating a close fixation to composite bone with small relative movement. Both 6 and 12% shortened versions showed significant reduced relative movement at the tip when compared to the original length, suggesting a limited role for the tip in terms of rotational stability. Regarding the medio-lateral torque, the stems always reacted with a backlash and did not tilt like a rigid body. Although not significant, the distal bending tended to increase with reduced length. These findings led us to develop a Kerboull stem with 12% distal reduction that is currently under clinical trial

Purpose. Investigating the effects of femoral stem length on hip and knee muscle strength. Methods. The study included 20 patients having undergone total knee prostheses (TKP) due to coxarthrosis and 10 healthy subjects. Of the 20 patients, 10 underwent conventional TKP and 10 had Thrust Plate Prothesis (TPP). For the assessment of the patients’ muscle strength of operated and non-operated hips (Gl. medius and Gl. Maximus) and knees (Quadriceps Femoris-QF), the Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) was used. Results. A significant difference was observed in the muscle strength of Gl. medius in TPP patients and of Gl. maksimus in conventional TKP patients (p <0.05). Compared to the healthy group, only hip muscle strength decreased in TPP patients, but both hip and knee muscle strengths decreased in conventional TKP patients (p <0.05). Conclusion. A decrease in hip and knee muscle strengths was determined in the TPP and conventional THA patients, compared to healthy subjects. Compared to the bone protective prosthetic systems (eg TPP), a significant difference is observed in the QF muscle strength in intramedullary prosthesis applications. This data may be used in planning the treatment of patients with hip arthroplasty

Introduction. The Exeter cemented polished tapered stem design was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1970's. [i] Design and cement visco-elastic properties define clinical results [ii]; a recent study by Carrington et al. reported the Exeter stem has 100% survivorship at 7 years. [iii] Exeter stems with offsets 37.5–56 mm have length 150 mm (shoulder to tip). Shorter stems, lengths 95–125 mm, exist in offsets 30–35.5 mm. The Australian National Joint Replacement Registry recently published that at 7 years the shorter stems are performing as well as longer stems on the registry [iv]. Clinical observation indicates in some cases of shorter, narrower femora that fully seating a 150 mm stem's rasp in the canal can be difficult, which may affect procedural efficiency. This study investigates the comparative risk of rasp distal contact for the Exeter 150 mm stem or a 125 mm stem. Materials and Methods. Rasps for 37.5, 44, 50 mm offset, No.1, 150 mm length stems (Exeter, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah NJ) were compared with shortened length models using SOMA™ (Stryker Orthopaedics Modeling and Analytics technology). 637 patients' CT scanned femora were filtered for appropriate offset and size by measuring femoral-head to femoral-axis distance and midsection cancellous bone width (AP view). These femora were analyzed for distal contact (rasp to cortices) for 150 mm and 125 mm models (Figure 1). The widths of the rasp's distal tip and the cancellous bone boundary were compared to assess contact for each femur in the AP and ML views; the rasp was aligned along an ideal axis and flexed in order to pass through the femoral neck (ML view only). Results. The sample size of appropriate patients totaled 238 femora. In the AP view, the rasp exhibited contact in 43 cases for a 150 mm stem but in 0 cases for a 125 mm stem; 95% of bones with contact were Champagne Fluted. In the ML view, rasp distal contact occurred in 52 femora for a 150 mm stem and in 1 femur for a 125 mm stem (Table 1). The difference was significant in both views with p < 0.001. Discussion. This study shows that a shortened stem design's rasp avoids distal contact. Shorter stem rasps resolved all cases where there was a risk of contact with a 150 mm rasp and reduced the likelihood of contact (one case compared to 52), AP and ML views respectively. These results indicate that shorter stems may address patients with champagne-fluted and/or excessively bowed femora, commonly found in the Asian population[v]. Contact avoidance may improve rasp seating height (AP view) and alignment with the femoral axis (ML view), thereby increasing procedural efficiency and producing an optimal cement mantle distally.[vi] The data shows that a total 29% of appropriate model patients would benefit from a shorter stem. Shorter cemented stems may effectively address the global population's needs in THR

Introduction. Femoral component design is a key part of hip arthroplasty performance. We have previously reported that a hip resurfacing offered functional improved performance over a long stem. However resurfacing is not popular for many reasons, so there is a growing trend towards shorter femoral stems, which have the added benefit of ease of introduction through less invasive incisions. Concern is also developing about the impact of longer stems on lifetime risk of periprosthetic fracture, which should be reduced by the use of a shorter stem. For these reasons, we wanted to know whether a shorter stem offered any functional improvement over a conventional long stem. We surmised that longer stems in hip implants might stiffen the femoral shaft, altering the mechanical properties. Materials and Methods. From our database of over 800 patients who have been tested in the lab, we identified 95 patients with a hip replacement performed on only one side, with no other lower limb co-morbidities, and a control group:. 19 with long stem implant, age 66 ± 14 (LONG). 40 with short stem implant, age 69 ± 9 (SHORT). 26 with resurfacing, age 60 ± 8 (RESURF). 43 healthy control with no history of arthroplasty, age 59 ± 10 (CONTROL). All groups were matched for BMI and gender. Participants were asked to walk on an instrumented treadmill. Initially a 5 minute warm up at 4 km/h, then tests at increasing speed in 0.5 km/h increments. Maximum walking speed was determined by the patients themselves, or when subjects moved from walking to running. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were measured in 20 second intervals at each speed. Features were calculated based on the mean GRF for each trial, and on symmetry measures such as first peak force (heel strike), second peak force (toe-off), the rate at which the foot was loaded and unloaded, and step length. Results. When measured by top walking speed, stemmed implants of either type appear slower than those which do not include the femoral shaft (resurfacing). The latter group walking speed was equal to the control group (Figure 1). When looking at the whole gait cycle at any one speed, no major differences appear in the first or second peak forces (Figure 2 – 5km/h, implanted side compared). When checked for asymmetry, resurfacing patients did not demonstrate any asymmetry between legs, while either stemmed groups demonstrated slight differences between legs in terms of force related features (Figure 3). Discussion. We sought to show if stem length has an impact on top walking speed and asymmetry of gait. This small study contributes to that debate. We could not demonstrate any functional superiority of the short over the long stem, but the short femoral stem seems to transmit load just as well as the longer stem, allowing good load transfer at toe-off, and comparable walking speed. The results stress the advantages of non stemmed implants as published before. Our study adds to the discussion as to whether long stems are still needed in primary arthroplasty

Published investigations with custom short stems have reported very encouraging results (Walker, et al, 1). However, off-the-shelf (OTS) versions of shorter length prostheses has not met with the same success. Several basic questions must be addressed. First, what is the purpose of a stem? Second, can stem length be reduced and if so by how much can this be safely done. Third, what are the effects of stem shortening and are there other design criteria which must take on greater importance in the absence of a stem to protect against implant aseptic failure. To examine these issues a testing rig was constructed which attempts to simulate the in vivo loading situation of a hip, Fig. 1 (Walker, et, al.). Fresh cadaveric femora were tested with the femora intact and then with femoral components of varying stem length implanted to examine the distribution of stresses within the femur under increasing loads as a function of stem length. This was correlated with observations of prospective DEXA measurement of proximal femoral bone mass and implant migration following THR (Leali, 3). We then initiated a prospective multi-center study of a specific short stem design which included three geometric features to ensure initial implant stability. This report documents that after 2 years, in the first 200 stems implanted, this design has been shown to provide stability against subsidence, flexion/extetnsion and rotational forces. This is consistent with the findings of the in-vitro studies and identical to the previously published clinical results of a similarly designed full length version of this same stem. Our studies indicated that a stem is not an absolute requirement in order to achieve a well functioning, stable implant. Initial stability can be achieved in the absence of a stem, by a “rest fit,” if adequate design features are incorporated. These studies also demonstrated that simply reducing the length of an existing implant to accommodate changes in surgical techniques may not be a reasonable or safe design change. Such shortened versions of existing stem designs must undergo rigorously in-vitro testing and clinical validation before being released for implantation

The choice of stem length in total hip revision with impaction bone grafting of femur is essentially based upon the grade of cavitation of femur and surgeon's preference. The standard length stem has been often critiqued for the apprehension of peri-prosthetic fracture. Our study highlights the importance of proximal bone stock rather than distal cavitation in determining the length of femoral stem. 168 total hip revisions of 162 patients with impaction bone grafting and cemented standard C-stem (done with standardized technique) between 1995 and 2008 at a tertiary referral centre were included. Revisions for infection and segmental bone defects were excluded. Serial radiographs were retrospectively analysed by two people independently, using Endoklinik classification, Gruen zones and more and outcomes were analysed. Mean follow-up of the 168 revision hips was 10.5 years (range 5 – 19.1 years). 14 patients (8.3%) were re-revised, reasons being, persistent deep infection (1.8%), repeated dislocations (1.2%), cup loosening (4.8%) and stem loosening (1.2%). Only 1 patient (0.6%) was re-revised due to stem loosening alone. No peri-prosthetic fractures or stem breakage were identified. Use of standard stem length in hip revisions with impaction bone grafting doesn't increase the risk of peri-prosthetic fractures even during long term follow up period. This questions the principle of bypassing the distal cavitation of femur by 2 cortical diameters with the use of long stem. In our experience, a good proximal femur support aids in the performance of standard length cemented stems in revision for aseptic loosening irrespective of grade of distal cavitation for cavitory defects of femur treated with impaction bone grafting

Recent trends in surgical techniques for THR, i.e. MIS and anterior approaches, have spawned an interest in and possible need for shorter femoral prostheses. Although, early clinical investigations with custom short stems have reported very encouraging results, the transition to off-the-shelf (OTS) versions of shorter length prostheses has not met with the same degree of success. Early reports with OTS devices have documented unacceptably high and significant incidences of implant instability, migration, mechanical/aseptic failure, and technical difficulty in achieving reproducible implantation outcomes. They have highlighted the absolute need for a better understanding of the consequences of changes in implant design as well as for improvements in instrumentation and surgeon training. Two basic questions must be addressed. First, what is the purpose of a stem? And second, can stem length be reduced and if so by how much can this be safely done. What are the effects of stem shortening and are there other design criteria which must take on greater importance in the absence of a stem to protect against implant failure. To examine these questions a testing rig was constructed which attempts to simulate the in vivo loading situation of a hip, fig. 1. Fresh cadaveric femora were tested with the femora intact and then with femoral components of varying stem length implanted to examine the distribution of stresses within the femur under increasing loads as a function of stem length. Our studies indicated that a stem is not an absolute requirement in order to achieve a well functioning, stable implant. However in order to reduce the possibility of mechanical failure a reduced stem or stemless implant absolutely must have three important characteristics to its design. First, it must have sufficient medial/lateral dimension to provide stability against subsidence and varus stress; second it must have a flat posterior surface, parallel and in contact with the posterior endosteal surface of the proximal femur with which to maximize A/P stability against flexion/extension forces (As a consequence of this design feature, appropriate anteversion must be achieved in the neck region of the prosthesis and not by rotation of the implant within the proximal metaphyseal cavity of the femur); and third, the implant must also have a cross-sectional geometry that will stabilize against torsional loading about the long axis of the femur. Therefore, simply reducing the length of an existing implant to accommodate changes in surgical techniques may not be a reasonable or safe design change. Such shortened versions of existing stem designs must be rigorously tested before being released for general use. The required design parameters outlined above have been clinically validated in custom fabricated implants. They have been shown to reduce aseptic loosening and migration of a short stem femoral implant. This report will provide the clinical review of a multi-center experience with the first 200 off-the-shelf “Lateral Flare” short stem implants

Recent trends in surgical techniques for THR, i.e. MIS and anterior approaches, have spawned an interest in and possible need for shorter femoral prostheses. Although, early clinical investigations with custom short stems have reported very encouraging results, the transition to off-the-shelf (OTS) versions of shorter length prostheses has not met with the same degree of success. Early reports with OTS devices have documented unacceptably high and significant incidences of implant instability, migration, mechanical/aseptic failure, and technical difficulty in achieving reproducible implantation outcomes. They have highlighted the absolute need for a better understanding of the consequences of changes in implant design as well as for improvements in instrumentation and surgeon training. Two basic questions must be addressed. First, what is the purpose of a stem? And second, can stem length be reduced and if so by how much can this be safely done. What are the effects of stem shortening and are there other design criteria which must take on greater importance in the absence of a stem to protect against implant failure. To examine these questions a testing rig was constructed which attempts to simulate the in vivo loading situation of a hip, fig. 1. Fresh cadaveric femora were tested with the femora intact and then with femoral components of varying stem length implanted to examine the distribution of stresses within the femur under increasing loads as a function of stem length. Our studies indicated that a stem is not an absolute requirement in order to achieve a well functioning, stable implant. However in order to reduce the possibility of mechanical failure a reduced stem or stemless implant absolutely must have three important characteristics to its design. First, it must have sufficient medial/lateral dimension to provide stability against subsidence and varus stress; second it must have a flat posterior surface, parallel and in contact with the posterior endosteal surface of the proximal femur with which to maximize A/P stability against flexion/extension forces (As a consequence of this design feature, appropriate anteversion must be achieved in the neck region of the prosthesis and not by rotation of the implant within the proximal metaphyseal cavity of the femur); and third, the implant must also have a cross-sectional geometry that will stabilize against torsional loading about the long axis of the femur. Therefore, simply reducing the length of an existing implant to accommodate changes in surgical techniques may not be a reasonable or safe design change. Such shortened versions of existing stem designs must be rigorously tested before being released for general use. The required design parameters outlined above have been clinically validated in custom fabricated implants. They have been shown to reduce aseptic loosening and migration of a short stem femoral implant. This report will provide the clinical review of a multi-center experience with the first 150 off-the-shelf “Lateral Flare” short stem implants

Introduction. Conventional hip radiographs allow surgeons, during preoperative planning, to make important decisions. Size and location of implants are routinely measured by overlaying schematics of the implanted components onto preoperative radiographs. Most currently available planning tools are in two-dimensions (2D), using X-ray images and 2D templates of the implants. Determination of the ideal component size requires two radiographic views of the femur: the anterior-posterior (AP) and the lateral direction. The surgeon uses this information to determine component sizes. Even though this approach has been used for many years leading to very good results, this manual process potentially carries multiple shortcomings. The biggest issue with the AP X-ray image is the fact that it is 2D in nature while the measurement's objective is to obtain three-dimensional (3D) parameters. Objective. The objective of this study is to derive a methodology to automatically select correct THA implant sizes while keeping the anatomical center of each specific patient within a forward solution model (FSM) that predicts post-operative outcomes. Methods. The femoral components in our process contain five parameters: stem length, neck offset, neck length, neck shaft angle, and component width. There are many steps to measure the morphologic parameters of a femoral component. (1)Preparation of training implant database, (2)defining multi-plane intersection, (3)determining circumcircles for all intersected femoral component contours, (4)finding centers and radii of circumcircles, (5)measuring distances from each circumcircle to the femoral component head center, and (6)determining the stem shaft axis. The FSM fits specific femoral canal using a 3D mesh model of the femur. The femoral component and canal morphology of a femur model are compared to the training femoral component database. For each femoral component morphology, the algorithm determines how far distally the femoral component fits within the canal before collision between the stem and cortical bone. Once the defined position is confirmed, the relative distance from the anatomical femoral head center to the femoral component head center is calculated. This process is repeated for all femoral component morphology. The best fitting femoral component is determined when the distance from its head center to the femoral head center is minimized, Figure 1. Results. Three intensive validation tools have been developed: (1) cross-sectional analysis, (2) slice analysis, and (3) contact map analysis. Cross-sectional analysis is a graphic interaction program where users can freely view the anatomy at any orientation, Figure 2. The slice analysis enhances the user visualization by providing a static view of the fit between chosen femoral component and femoral canal, Figure 3. Finally, the contact map analysis allows for visualization of contact area through the bone-stem interface. Conclusion and Discussion. This is a powerful tool with the FSM that allows surgeons to get a “best fit” implant in 3D, based on canal fit and distance from anatomical femoral head center. Surgeons may want to manually size up or down, but the program will pick best fit sizes based on anatomical morphology. Future iterations will consider the reaming depth each surgeon uses to improve implant selection for each surgeon's technique. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is necessary to prevent painful aseptic loosening and resultant humeral bone loss. Causes of humeral component loosening include stem design and material, stem length and geometry, ingrowth vs. ongrowth surfaces, quality of bone available for fixation, glenoid polyethylene debris osteolysis, exclusion of articular particulate debris, joint stability, rotator cuff function, and patient activity levels. Fixation of the humeral component may be achieved by cement fixation either partial or complete and press-fit fixation. During the past two decades, uncemented humeral fixation has become more popular, especially with short stems and stemless press fit designs. Cemented humeral component fixation risks difficult and complicated revision surgery, stress shielding of the tuberosities and humeral shaft periprosthetic fractures at the junction of the stiff cemented stem and the remaining humeral shaft. Press fit fixation may minimise these cemented risks but has potential for stem loosening. A randomised clinical trial of 161 patients with cemented vs. press fit anatomic total shoulder replacements found that cemented fixation of the humeral component provided better quality of life, strength, and range of motion than uncemented fixation but longer operative times. Another study found increased humeral osteolysis (43%) associated with glenoid component loosening and polyethylene wear, while stress shielding was seen with well-fixed press fit humeral components. During reverse replacement the biomechanical forces are different on the humeral stem. Stem loosening during reverse replacement may have different factors than anatomic replacement. A systemic review of 41 reverse arthroplasty clinical studies compared the functional outcomes and complications of cemented and uncemented stems in approximately 1800 patients. There was no difference in the risk of stem loosening or revision between cemented and uncemented stems. Uncemented stems have at least equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with cemented stems during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is associated with fully cemented stems or well ingrown components that exclude potential synovial debris that may cause osteolysis

The advent of modern anatomic shoulder arthroplasty occurred in the 1990's with the revelation that the humeral head dimensions had a fixed ratio between the head diameter and height. As surgeons moved from the concept of balancing soft tissue tension by using variable neck lengths for a given humeral head diameter, a flawed concept based on lower extremity reconstruction, improvements in range of motion and function were immediately observed. Long term outcome has validated this guiding principle for anatomic shoulder replacement with improved longevity of implants, improved patient and surgeon expectations and satisfaction with results. Once the ideal humeral head prosthesis is identified, and its position prepared, the surgeon must use a method to fix the position of the head that is correct in three dimensions and has the security to withstand patient activities and provide maximal longevity. Based again on lower extremity concepts, long stems were the standard of care, initially with cement, and now, almost universally without cement for a primary shoulder replacement. The incredibly low revision rates for humeral stem aseptic loosening shifted much of the attempted innovation to the challenges on the glenoid side of the reconstruction. However, glenoid problems including revision surgery, infections, periprosthetic fractures, and other complications often required the removal of the humeral stem. And, in many cases, the overall results of the procedure and the patient's long-term outcome was affected by the difficulty in removing the stem, leading surgeons to compromise the revision procedure, avoid revision surgery, or add to the overall morbidity with humeral fractures and substantial bone loss. With improved technology, including bone ingrowth methods, better matching of the proximal stem geometry to the humerus, and an understanding that the center of rotation (torque) on the humeral component is at the level of the humeral osteotomy, shorter stems and stemless humeral components were developed, now more than 10 years ago, primarily in Europe. With more than a decade of experience, our European colleagues have shown us that stemless humeral component replacement with a device that has both cortical and cancellous fixation is as effective as a stemmed device, easier to implant as well as revise when needed. The short-term results of the cancellous fixation stemless devices are acceptable, but longer follow-up is needed. Currently, the most widely used humeral components in the USA are short stem components, although the recent FDA approval of numerous stemless devices has initiated a shift from short stems to stemless devices. The truth is, short stem devices have a firm position in the USA surgeons' armamentarium today due to regulatory restrictions. A decade ago, without a predicate on the market, it was not conceivable that a stemless device that was already gaining popularity in Europe would be able to get 510K approval, and therefore would require a lengthy and expensive FDA IDE process. However, shorter stems had already been approved in the USA, as long as the stem length was 7 centimeters, matching the market predicate. Now, in 2018, based on evidence and outcomes, stemless humeral components should be the first choice when treating primary osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Short stem or longer stem devices should be reserved for those cases where stemless fixation is not possible, which is less than 10% of patients with primary OA of the shoulder

Total shoulder arthroplasty results in excellent outcomes for most patients who suffer from osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Current trends within the field reflect a desire to minimise stem lengths in contemporary prosthetic designs. The movement towards short-stem humeral implants proffers several advantages including the ease of revision and ‘less invasive’ surgery. But, is there data to support these claims? This talk will focus on the proposed advantages of short-stem implants, variations in the current designs, the data on their outcomes and other current concepts with these implants

Shortened humeral stem implants can be advantageous as they preserve more of the patient's bone and are not limited by the canal for placement in the proximal body. However, traditional longer stems may help stabilize the implant through interaction with the dense cortical bone of the canal. We developed an FEA model to gage the contributions of design features such as stem length, coatings, and interference fit. Models were constructed in FEMAP and solved using the NX Nastran advanced nonlinear static solver. The Turon (DJO Surgical) implant geometry was imported from a Solidworks CAD file and bone geometry was taken from a statistical shape model by Materialise representing the mean humeral geometry of 95 healthy humeri (avg age = 69.9 years). Implant and cancellous bone were considered to be linear homogeneous materials, and the cortical shell was modeled as orthotropic. Interference fits between the implant and cancellous bone surfaces were modeled using the gap feature of NX Nastran with friction coefficients corresponding to the surface finish. Loading was applied through a control node located at the center for the replacement head. Two loading conditions were analyzed, one representing torsion about the neck axis with a magnitude of 3140 Nm and one representing the peak load vector during activities of daily living. Using resection plane nodes at the intersection of the implant and bone, the histograms of micromotion and the associated 5. th. , 50. th. , and 95. th. percentile values were calculated. For a traditional length stem, the dominate effect on the predicted micromotion at the resection plane was the interference fit in the coating region. The contribution of a traditional length stem to resection plane micromotion was complex and depended on the presence of the stem and the amount of interference fit in the coating region

The technique involves impaction of cancellous bone into a cavitary femur. If segmental defects are present, the defects can be closed with stainless steel mesh. The technique requires retrograde fill of the femoral cavity with cancellous chips of appropriate size to create a new endomedullary canal. By using a set of trial impactors that are slightly larger than the real implants the cancellous bone is impacted into the tube. Subsequent proximal impaction of bone is performed with square tip or half moon impactors. A key part of the technique is to impact the bone tightly into the tube especially around the calcar to provide optimal stability. Finally a polished tapered stem is cemented using almost liquid cement in order to achieve interdigitation of the implant to the cancellous bone. The technique as described is rarely performed today in many centers around the world. In the US, the technique lost its interest because of the lengthy operative times, unacceptable rate of peri-operative and post-operative fractures and most importantly, owing to the success of tapered fluted modular stems. In centers such as Exeter where the technique was popularised, it is rarely performed today as well, as the primary cemented stems used there, rarely require revision. There is ample experience from around the globe, however, with the technique. Much has been learned about the best size and choice of cancellous graft, force of impaction, surface finish of the cemented stem, importance of stem length, and the limitations and complications of the technique. There are also good histology data that demonstrate successful vascularization and incorporation of the impacted cancellous bone chips and host bone. Our experience at the clinic was excellent with the technique as reported in CORR in 2003 by M Cabanela. The results at mid-term demonstrated minimal subsidence and good graft incorporation. Six of 54 hips, however, had a post-operative distal femoral fracture requiring ORIF. The use of longer cemented stems may decrease the risk of distal fracture and was subsequently reported by the author after reviewing a case series from Exeter. Today, I perform this technique once or twice per year. It is an option in the younger patient, where bone restoration is desired. Usually in a Paprosky Type IV femur, where a closed tube can be recreated and the proximal bone is reasonable. If the proximal bone is of poor quality, then I prefer to perform a transfemoral osteotomy, and perform an allograft prosthetic composite instead of impaction grafting, and wrap the proximal bone around the structural allograft. I prefer this technique as I can maintain the soft tissues over the bone and avoid the stripping that would be required to reinforce the bone with struts or mesh. Another indication for its use in the primary setting is in the patient with fibrous dysplasia

A large body of the orthopaedic literature clearly indicates that the cement mantle surrounding the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty should be at least 2 mm thick. In the early 1970s, another concept was introduced and is still in use in France consisting of implanting a canal filling femoral component line-to-line associated with a thin cement mantle. This principle has been named the “French paradox”. An explanation to this phenomenon has been provided by in-vitro studies demonstrating that a thin cement mantle in conjunction with a canal filling stem was supported mainly by cortical bone and was subjected to low stresses. We carried out a study to evaluate the in-vivo migration patterns of 164 primary consecutive Charnley-Kerboull total hip replacements. All prosthesis in the current series combined an all-polyethylene socket and a 22.2 mm stainless steel femoral head. The monobloc double tapered (5.9 degrees) femoral component was made of 316L stainless steel with a highly polished surface (Ra = 0.04 μm), a quadrangular section, and a neck-stem angle of 130 degrees. The stem was available in six sizes with a stem length (shoulder to tip) ranging from 110 mm to 160 mm, and a neck length ranging from 24 mm to 56 mm. For each size, the femoral component was available in two to four different diameters to adapt the implant to the medullary canal. Hence the whole range comprised a total of 18 standard femoral components. The femoral preparation included removal of diaphyseal cancellous bone to obtain primary rotational and varus/valgus stability of the stem prior to the line-to-line cementation. We used the Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse Femoral Component (EBRA-FCA) method to assess the subsidence of the femoral component. At the minimum 15-year follow-up, 73 patients were still alive and had not been revised at a mean of 17.3 years, 8 patients had been revised, 66 patients were deceased, and 8 patients were lost to follow-up. The mean subsidence of the entire series was 0.63 ± 0.49 mm (0 – 1.94 mm). When using a 1.5 mm threshold, only four stems were considered to have subsided. With revision of either component for any reason as the endpoint, the cumulative survival rate at 17 years was 90.5 ± 3.2% (95% CI, 84.2% to 96.8%). With radiological loosening of the femoral component as the endpoint, the cumulative survival rate at 17 years was 96.8 ± 3.1% (95% CI, 93.2% to 100%). This study demonstrated that, in most cases, a highly polished double tapered stem cemented line-to-line does not subside up to 18-year follow-up

Introduction. Successful designs of total hip replacement need to be robust to surgery-related variability. Until recently, only simple parametric studies have explored the influence of surgical variability [1]. This study presents a systematic method for quantifying the effect of variability in positioning on the primary stability of femoral stems using finite element (FE) models. Methods. Patient specific finite element models were generated of two femurs, one male and one female. An automated algorithm positioned and sized a Corail stem (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw) into each of the femurs to achieve maximum fill of the medullary canal without breaching into the cortical bone boundaries.. Peak joint contact and muscle forces associated with level gait were applied[2] and scaled to the body mass of each subject, whilst the distal femur was rigidly constrained. The space prone to surgical variation was defined by the “gap” between the stem and the inner boundary of the cortical bone. The anterior/posterior and the varus/valgus alignment of the stem within this “gap” was controlled by varying the location of the points defining the shaft axis. The points were taken at 20% and 80% of the stem length (Figure 1). The anteversion angle as well as the vertical and the medial position of the stem were controlled by changing the location of the head centre within the femoral head radius. The location of these points was varied using Latin Hypercube sampling to generate 200 models per femur, each with a unique stem position. The risk of failure was evaluated based on stem micromotion, equivalent strains, and percentage of the bone-prosthesis contact area experiencing more than 7000 µstrains [3]. Results. The range of positions covered in this study adhered to the anatomy of the subjects (Table 1) and none of the stem positions breached into the cortical bone of the femur. The 90th percentile peri-prosthetic strains were between 1770 – 4792 µstrains for the male subject, and 2710 – 11260µstrains for the female subject. The 90th percentile micromotion was between (15.6 – 47) µm for the male subject, and (42.4 – 102.4) µm for the female subject. The percentage of the contact area experiencing more than 7000 µstrains was between (0% – 0.33%) for the male subject, and (0% – 12%) for the female subject. Discussion. A systematic method for studying the effect of surgical-related variation on primary stability was presented its applicability demonstrated on two femurs. The study found that variation in stem position may result in large variation (up to 1.5 times the baseline position) in strains and micromotions. The magnitude Up to three times the magnitudes for the ideal stem position. This method can be applied to larger samples to understand the influence of different alignment parameters on the primary stability of femoral stems

A design modification to the DJO Linear hip stem was performed to facilitate use of the stem with the minimally invasive direct anterior approach. While the main design consideration was to reduce the overall stem length, it was also important to increase congruency of the implant and proximal cortical bone to ensure initial stability. An initial design attempt produced a geometry that was difficult to insert into the femur; therefore, reconstructed digital models of the femur (ADaMs by Materialise) were obtained and used to delineate the best fit implant cross section. The ADaMs models were constructed from 74 CT scans taken from northern Europeans undergoing investigations for cardio-vascular conditions. Using equivalency points, models representing the bone mean, ±1σ, and ±2σ were constructed. The ADaMs models are pictured in Figure 1. After importing the ADaMs models in the Solidworks CAD environment, the existing Linear stem was ideally positioned in the femur model and equally spaced planes parallel to the resection plane were defined as shown in Figure 2. At each plane, the shape of the cortical bone was determined and then used to define an implant cross section that was congruent to the bone, at least as large as the Linear hip stem, and symmetric about its midline. After using the base ADaMs models to drive the design's geometry, the final design fit was validated for very small patients using a hypothetical size −4σ extrapolation of the ADaMs models. The digital reconstructions improved the design process by providing accurate, tangible models of the actual femur geometry. From these models, the design team was able to visualize how implant geometry should be constructed to optimize congruency, symmetry, and favorable insertion characteristics. Additionally, the ADaMs models served to validate the design for a challenging condition and as a starting point for computer simulations that were able to predict the insertion difficulty encountered in the initial, pre ADaMs model design. The final redesign was launched in the US in 2014 as the TaperFill hip stem

Background. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) using a circumferential metal mesh is one of the options that allow restoration of the femoral bone stock and stability of the implant in hip arthroplasty. Here we examined the clinical and radiographic outcome of this procedure with a cemented stem and analyzed experimentally the initial stability of mesh–grafted bone–cemented stem complexes. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 6 hips (6 patients) that had undergone femoral revisions with a circumferential metal mesh, impacted bone allografts, and a cemented stem. The mean follow-up period was 2.9 years (range, 1.4–3.8 years). Hip joint function was evaluated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score, and radiographic changes were determined from radiographs. The initial resistance of cemented stem complexes to axial and rotational force was measured in a composite bone model with various segmental losses of the proximal femur. Results. The hip score improved from 50 (range, 10–84) preoperatively to a mean of 74 (range, 67–88) at the final follow-up. The overall implant survival rate was 100% at 4 years when radiological loosening or revision for any reason was used as the endpoint. No stem subsided more than 3 mm vertically within 1 year after implantation. Computed tomography showed reconstitution of the femoral canal in a metal mesh. In mechanical analyses, there was no influence on the stem stability to axial compression during the repeated axial compression test between IBG reconstruction rates. On the other hand, for IBG reconstruction rate of 66.7%, grafted bone-Sawbone juntion was buckled under the axial breaking force. In contrast, under rotational load, the rotation angles of the stainless mesh were strongly affected by the IBG reconstruction rate. Conclusions. The short-term results show good outcomes for reconstruction of proximal bone loss with impaction bone allografts and a circumferential mesh. The procedure should be applied in cases where the circumferential proximal bone loss is less than half of the stem length implanted

Objective. Failures of internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures pose great challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. Hip arthroplasty can be a remedy for such failures, however, the selection of femoral stem length is controversial. This study aims to report our experience of managing failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures with standard femoral stem arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective review of patients who were managed with hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures in the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, P.R. China between January 2001 to December 2013 was performed. Patients’ age, gender, pre- and postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), femoral stem types and surgical outcomes were traced and analyzed. Results. 14 patients were included. The average age at the time of internal fixation and hip arthroplasty was 74.6 years old (Range, 56–89) and 75.8 years old (Range, 58–90), respectively. The time duration between internal fixation and hip arthroplasty ranged from 3 to 26 months. 5 were total hip arthroplasty while 9 were hemiarthroplasty. 4 were implanted with long femoral stems while 10 with standard stems, including 4 cementless (SL-PLUS, Smith & Nephew)and 6 cemented stems. Standard femoral stems were defined as ones that are designed to be used in primary hip replacement, with the length of which ranging from 120 to 140mm. The distal ends of these stems did not exceed the distal screw hole levels of 2 cortical diameters. After a mean follow-up time of 6.4 years (Range, 1–13), 2 patients lost to follow-up and 2 died of non-surgically related diseases. For the 8 cases with standard stems, at the latest follow-up, no periprosthetic fractures or periprosthetic joint infections were observed. A total of 3 hip dislocations happened in 2 patients but were managed successfully with manipulative reduction followed by hip brace. The HHS score increased from an average of 35.6 preoperatively to 79.4 after surgery. Conclusions. Hip arthroplasty can be performed as revision for failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures. Use of standard femoral stems is less invasive, reduces expenditure and can also achieve similar satisfactory clinical outcomes as long femoral stems. However, the long-term clinical outcomes required further follow-up