Introduction. The origins of the uncemented tapered wedge hip stem design currently offered by several orthopaedic device companies can be linked back to the cemented Straight Mueller type stem design first used in 1977. The design, a wedge shape with a taper angle of 6 degrees, maintains a single medial curvature for all sizes and increases laterally in the width to accommodate different size femurs. Although evolutionary improvements have been made over the years the basic body geometry of the stem has stayed mainly unchanged with excellent clinical survivorship. Over the past decade, the demographics of hip replacement have changed, with a large increase in younger male patients in the age range of 40 to 60 years. In this study the femoral fit of a novel tapered stem, designed to fit a wide array of patient types, is compared to a standard predicate tapered stem design. Methods. A bone morphology study was performed on a patient population of 556 patients using three dimensional digital data from CT-scans. To characterize the fit of the stem designs we analyzed the ratio of a distal (60mm below lesser trochanter) and a proximal (10mm above lesser trochanter) cross section. The same measurements were taken with the standard tapered stem design and the novel tapered stem design, with a given constant implantation height of 20mm above the lesser trochanter. The fit of the stems was classified as Type 1, where there was both proximal and distal engagement, Type 2, proximal engagement only, Type 3, distal engagement only. The distal and proximal engagement, Type 1, was specified with a maximum engagement difference of 2mm proximal to distal. Results. The standard tapered stem showed a well balanced distal to proximal ratio in the median sizes. However, with increasing stem size the distal engagement increases. The novel tapered stem design showed a well balanced proximal to distal ratio throughout the complete size range. With respect to Type 3 fit classification the novel tapered stem design showed a reduced percentage of distal engagements (2.8%) compared to the predicate standard stem (17.2%). In the 40 to 60 year old male group the distal engagements for the standard stem increases (28.2%), whereas the distal engagements for the novel stem remains unchanged (1.3%). Discussion. The cementless, tapered wedge stem design is used in large numbers globally due to its ease of use and reproducibility. However, changing patient demographics and associated bone morphology represents a challenge for existing designs to achieve a proximal fit. The novel tapered stem design presented here was adapted to these influencing factors by optimizing the proximal to distal ratio with respect to the whole patient group resulting in a particularly marked improvement in proximal fit in the male 40–60 age group compared to predicate stem designs

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) following hip arthroplasty are complex injuries. This study evaluates patient demographic characteristics, management, outcomes, and risk factors associated with PPF subtypes over a decade.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe the management and associated outcomes of patients sustaining a femoral hip periprosthetic fracture (PPF) in the UK population.

Introduction. Modern cementless press fit stems rely on early fixation and stability for osteointegration and longterm success with early migration increasing the risk of failure. The Ein Bild Roentegen Analyse Femoral Component Analysis (EBRA-FCA) methods allow accurate measurement of femoral stem subsidence without the need for Tantalum markers. The degree of subsidence of femoral stems in the first two years has been shown to be highly predictive of failure when using the cut off value of 1.5 mm. We aimed to measure the early migration pattern of a titanium alloy, tapered, plasma and hydroxyapatite coated femoral stem and any factors associated with subsidence. Methods. Between January 2005-June 2007, 387 Accolade cementless femoral stems (Stryker, Allendale NJ) were implanted at our institution. Seventy-seven had a minimum of two years post operative follow up and a complete set of pre and postoperative radiographs for analysis. Our group inlcuded 45 females with a mean age of 71.4 years, and 32 males with a mean age of 68.5 years. The primary diagnosis was degenerative osteoarthritis in 71 patients, avascular necrosis in two, and post fracture in four patients. The average BMI was 27.1. We measured the canal index to assess bone quality and the canal calcar index to assess the proximal femoral morphology. Immediate postoperative radiographs were assessed for canal fill of the prosthesis and implantation varus/valgus angles. The EBRA-FCA software was used to obtain migration curves for each stem. Results. The mean follow up was 29.3months (24–48). The mean canal index was 0.55 (0.36–0.68) with a mean canal calcar index of 0.54 (0.39–0.79). The average canal fill index at the midpoint of the stem was <0.8 in 37 stems and >80 in 40 stems. The average subsidence at 24 months was 2 mm and this had risen to 2.4 mm by 36 months postoperatively. When analysed using a Kaplan Meier curve using 1.5 mm as an end point we found a survivorship of 63.4% (52.3–74.5) at 24 months and this had worsened to 41.6% (26.6–56.5) by 36 months. Multivariate and univariate regression analysis of measured variables did not reveal any significant hazard for any factor other than the larger stem sizes doing worse. Discussion. Although several cementless tapered stem designs have had an excellent track record, our migration analysis of the Accolade stem is somewhat concerning. Thirty three percent of stems had reached the 1.5 mm subsidence point by two years. This is of concern as work has previously shown this to predict failure of stems with aseptic loosening at ten years with an accuracy of 79%. If these stems go on to fail at the predicted rate this would represent an unacceptably high level of failure. Our data raises serious concerns about the overall clinical performance of this stem design due to poor initial stability and integration

Aims

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are devastating complications that are associated with functional limitations and increased overall mortality. Although cementless implants have been associated with an increased risk of PFF, the precise contribution of implant geometry and design on the risk of both intra-operative and post-operative PFF remains poorly investigated. A systematic review was performed to aggregate all of the PFF literature with specific attention to the femoral implant used.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines from 2011 recommend the use of cemented hemi-arthroplasty for appropriate patients with an intracapsular hip fracture. In our institution all patients who were admitted with an intracapsular hip fracture and were suitable for a hemi-arthroplasty between April 2010 and July 2012 received an uncemented prosthesis according to our established departmental routine practice. A retrospective analysis of outcome was performed to establish whether the continued use of an uncemented stem was justified. Patient, surgical and outcome data were collected on the National Hip Fracture database. A total of 306 patients received a Cathcart modular head on a Corail uncemented stem as a hemi-arthroplasty. The mean age of the patients was 83.3 years (sd 7.56; 46.6 to 94) and 216 (70.6%) were women. The mortality rate at 30 days was 5.8%. A total of 46.5% of patients returned to their own home by 30 days, which increased to 73.2% by 120 days. The implant used as a hemi-arthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture provided satisfactory results, with a good rate of return to pre-injury place of residence and an acceptable mortality rate. Surgery should be performed by those who are familiar with the design of the stem and understand what is required for successful implantation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1538–43.

Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218 re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97) for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening (HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection (HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications, including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased.

This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.