The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on Gustilo-Anderson (GA) type IIIB open tibial shaft (AO-42) injuries to determine the consistency of reporting in the literature. A search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify relevant studies published from January 2000 to January 2021 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The study was registered using the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. Patient/injury demographics, management and outcome reporting were recorded. There were 32 studies that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1,947 patients (70.3% male, 29.7% female). There were 6 studies (18.8%) studies that reported on comorbidities and smoking, with mechanism of injury reported in 22 (68.8%). No studies reported on all operative criteria included, with only three studies (9.4%) reporting for time to antibiotics, 14 studies (43.8%) for time from injury to debridement and nine studies (28.1%) for time to definitive fixation. All studies reported on the rate of deep infection, with a high proportion documenting union rate (26/32, 81.3%). However, only two studies reported on mortality or on other post-operative complications (2/32, 6.3%). Only 12 studies (37.5%) provided any patient reported outcomes. This study has demonstrated a deficiency and a lack of standardized variable and outcome reporting in the orthopaedic literature for Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open tibial shaft fractures. We propose a future international collaborative Delphi process is needed to standardize

Introduction. Despite the implementation of numerous preventive measures in recent years, the persistent challenge of periprosthetic infections remains. Among the various strategies, metallic modification of implants, particularly with silver, has emerged as a promising avenue. Silver's antimicrobial properties, coupled with its low human toxicity, render it an appealing option. However, ongoing debate surrounds its comparative efficacy in infection prevention when contrasted with titanium-coated prostheses. Methods. The PubMed database was systematically searched up to March 2024. Studies in English that met predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria and utilized “Megaprosthesis AND infection” and “ silver-coated AND infection “ as key terms were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) statement guided the article selection process. Results. From a pool of 1892 potential papers after literature screening, 11 studies with a total of 1419 patients were meticulously selected for analysis. Among these patients, 638 were treated with silver-coated implants, while 781 received titanium-coated implants, resulting in 166 recorded cases of infection. Remarkably, the infection rate stood at 9.2% for the silver-coated group, contrasting with 13.4% for the titanium-coated group. The subsequent analysis unveiled a notable discrepancy in proportions (P difference = -0.0473, 95%CI: -0.088 to -0.006), signaling a statistically significant decrease in infections within the silver-coated cohort. Furthermore, the I2 statistic, denoting heterogeneity in effect sizes, stood at 21.8% (95%CI: 0.0-66.9), indicating a modest degree of variability among the studies. Conclusion. In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis shed light on the potential of silver-coated implants in mitigating periprosthetic infections. Despite the persistent challenge posed by such infections, our findings suggest a statistically significant decrease in infection rates among patients treated with silver-coated implants compared to those with titanium-coated ones

Introduction. The transition from resident to registrar constitutes a steep learning curve in most medical practitioners’ careers, regardless of speciality. We aimed to determine whether a six-week orthopaedic surgical skills course could increase resident skills and confidence prior to transitioning to orthopaedic registrar within the Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia. Materials. Unaccredited registrars, orthopaedic trainees, and orthopaedic consultants, through a departmental peer reviewed process and survey, developed a six-session course (“Registrar Academy”) that included basic knowledge and essential practical skills training for residents with an interest in becoming orthopaedic registrars. This course was implemented over a 3-month period and assessed. Mixed method quantitative and qualitative evidence was sought via a 14-item and 18-item Likert scale questionnaire coupled with open-ended questions. Ethical approval was granted by our institutions Human Research and Ethics Comittee, reference no.: HREC/16/QGC336. Results/Discussion. Results were qualitatively synthesised using quantitative and qualitative data. Thirteen residents participated in the course. All residents agreed to statements indicating they felt unprepared to work as an orthopaedic registrar and were not confident in performing various core tasks required. After completing the course, residents indicated greater confidence or comfort in all these areas and felt better prepared for the transition to registrar. There was broad approval of the course among participants. Every participant who completed the final questionnaire agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed the course and that it taught usable, reproducible practical skills and increased their orthopaedic knowledge. This group also uniformly agreed or strongly agreed that the course improved their patient care and patient safety. Conclusion. Residents feel unprepared for their transition to orthopaedic registrar and lack confidence in several core competencies. A supplemental “Registrar Academy” within an institution is an effective way to improve knowledge, confidence, and practical skills for residents wishing to transition to a registrar position

Patients with a hindfoot deformity impose a particular challenge when performing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This could be attributed to the lack of insights concerning the outcome towards the hindfoot alignment. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature to investigate the influence of TKA on hindfoot alignment and vice-versa. In accordance with the Methodological Index For Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library were searched to identify capable studies studying the influence between TKA and hindfoot malalignment. We indentified four prospective cohort studies, seven retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study. All twelve articles addressed the influence of TKA on hindfoot alignment. Seven out of nine studies which noticed an improvement of hindfoot alignment after TKA, found a significant improvement (p<0.05). Aditionally three of these studies reported a significant improvement only in valgus hindfeet (p<0.05). On the topic of hindfoot alignment influencing TKA, we identified two studies. These studies reported an impact of hindfoot alignment on the weightbearing and described that 87% of hindfeet remained in valgus alignment after TKA. Available data suggests that alignment in valgus hindfeet can improve after TKA, though long term results are not present. Contrary to last, improvement of hindfoot alignment is not expected in varus hindfeet. Furthermore hindfoot alignment deformity may cause a reduction of the long term survival of the knee prosthesis and therefore should be taken in to account

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta- analysis to investigate the effect of initial varus or valgus displacement of proximal humerus on the outcomes of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing postoperative outcomes associated with initial varus versus initial valgus displacement of proximal humerus fracture. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified two retrospective cohort studies and one retrospective analysis of a prospective database, enrolling a total of 243 patients with proximal humerus fractures. Our analysis showed that initial varus displacement was associated with a higher risk of overall complication (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.12–4.64, P = 0.02), screw penetration (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06–5.02, P = 0.04), varus displacement (RR 4.38, 95% CI 2.22–8.65, P < 0.0001), and reoperation (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.80–5.03, P < 0.0001) compared to valgus displacement. There was no significant difference in avascular necrosis (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.62–3.27, P = 0.40), infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.46–4.84, P = 0.51), and non-union or malunion (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.37–5.04, P = 0.64). Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that initial varus displacement of proximal humerus fractures is associated with higher risk of overall complication, screw penetration, varus displacement, and reoperation compared to initial valgus displacement. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Further high quality studies, that are adequately powered, are required to investigate the outcomes of initial varus and valgus displacement in specific fracture types

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodesis. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified one prospective cohort study and 5 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 286 patients with ankle arthritis. Our analysis showed that open ankle fusion was associated with a lower fusion rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.52, P = 0.0002), longer tourniquet time (MD 16.49, 95% CI 9.46–23.41, P<0.00001), and longer length of stay (MD 1.60,95% CI 1.10–2.10, P<0.00001) compared to arthroscopic ankle fusion; however, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.76–7.64, P = 0.14), overall complication rate (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.80–2.96, P = 0.20), and operation time (MD 4.09, 95% CI −2.49–10.66, P = 0.22). The between-study heterogeneity was high for tourniquet time but low or moderate for other outcomes. The direction of the effect sizes remains unchanged throughout sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that arthroscopic ankle fusion may be associated with a higher fusion rate, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of stay compared to open ankle fusion. We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Long-term results of the comparative efficacy of arthroscopic ankle fusion over open ankle fusion are not currently available. Further high quality randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered are required

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodesis. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified one prospective cohort study and 5 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 286 patients with ankle arthritis. Our analysis showed that open ankle fusion was associated with a lower fusion rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.52, P = 0.0002), longer tourniquet time (MD 16.49, 95% CI 9.46–23.41, P<0.00001), and longer length of stay (MD 1.60,95% CI 1.10–2.10, P<0.00001) compared to arthroscopic ankle fusion; however, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.76–7.64, P = 0.14), overall complication rate (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.80–2.96, P = 0.20), and operation time (MD 4.09, 95% CI −2.49–10.66, P = 0.22). The between-study heterogeneity was high for tourniquet time but low or moderate for other outcomes. The direction of the effect sizes remains unchanged throughout sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that arthroscopic ankle fusion may be associated with a higher fusion rate, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of stay compared to open ankle fusion. We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Long-term results of the comparative efficacy of arthroscopic ankle fusion over open ankle fusion are not currently available. Further high quality randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered are required

Background. In the UK, over 160,000 total joint replacements are performed annually. About 1% of patients subsequently develop a deep bacterial infection and, if untreated, this can result in severe pain, disability, and death. Costs to the NHS are substantial. The INFORM (Infection Orthopaedic Management) programme aims to address gaps in knowledge relating to treatment of deep prosthetic joint infection through six work packages. The programme is supported by a patient forum and patient-partners working on oversight groups. Methods. Literature reviews and meta-analysis of individual patient data from cohort studies of patients treated for prosthetic hip infection. Analysis of the National Joint Registry to observe trends in infection rates, and identify risk markers for infection and effective treatments. Qualitative interviews with patients and health professionals exploring the impact of infection and its treatment. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare patient-centred outcomes after one- or two-stage revision for prosthetic hip infection. An economic evaluation to assess cost-effectiveness of treatments. A survey of patients to explore individuals’ preferences for treatments. Results. Individual patient data has been provided by UK and international centres. Data on over 1.4 million procedures is available from the National Joint Registry. Interviews conducted with 19 patients with prosthetic hip infection and 12 treating surgeons. Information has advised randomised controlled trial methodology. Seven major UK centres recruiting patients to the INFORM randomised controlled trial. Methods for assessment of costs from a health service and societal perspective developed for the randomised controlled trial. Qualitative studies have contributed to the design of a discrete choice questionnaire. Conclusions. Findings from INFORM will establish how patient care and outcomes can be optimised after prosthetic joint infection. Guidance on best clinical practice will be developed. Level of evidence 1–3. Funding statement This abstract presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (grant number: RP-PG-1210-12005). The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

Background. The two-stage revision strategy has been claimed as being the “gold standard” for treating prosthetic joint infection. The one-stage revision strategy remains an attractive alternative option, however, its effectiveness in comparison to the two-stage strategy remains uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness of one- and two-stage revision strategies to prevent re-infection after prosthetic hip infection. Methods. Cohort studies (prospective or retrospective) conducted in unselected patients with infection treated exclusively by one- or two-stage revision and reporting re-infection outcomes within two years of revision were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, manual search of bibliographies to March 2015, and email contact with investigators. Data were extracted by two independent investigators and a consensus was reached with involvement of a third. Rates of re-infection were aggregated using random-effect models after arcsine transformation, and were grouped by study and population level characteristics. Results. In 38 one-stage studies, the rate (95% confidence intervals) of re-infection was 8.2% (6.0–10.8). The corresponding re-infection rate for 60 two-stage studies was 7.9% (6.2–9.7). Re-infection rates remained generally similar when grouped by several study and population level characteristics. There was no evidence of publication bias among contributing studies. Conclusion. Among unselected populations, evidence from aggregate published data suggest similar re-infection rates after one- or two-stage revision. More detailed analyses under a broader range of circumstances and exploration of other sources of heterogeneity will require collaborative pooling of individual participant data, which is ongoing within our Global Infection Orthopaedic Management (INFORM) collaboration. Level of evidence. Level 2a - Systematic reviews of cohort studies. Funding statement. This abstract presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (grant number: RP-PG-1210-12005). The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

Background. Around 1% of patients who have hip replacement have deep prosthetic joint infection afterwards. Infection is treated with antibiotics and revision surgery. We aimed to characterise the impact of deep joint infection and its treatment, to identify treatment preferences, and to describe surgeons' treatment decisions. Methods. In a qualitative study in the UK we interviewed 19 patients who had infection after hip replacement and 12 orthopaedic surgeons specialising in infection. Face-to-face interviews with patients explored experience of infection, treatment and recovery. Interviews with surgeons explored treatment decisions. With consent, interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and anonymised. Once imported into QSR NVivo software, data were analysed using constant comparison. Results. Patients with deep joint infection described mobility loss, pain, loss of valued activities, changes to home environments/moving into care, negative impact on personal relationships and financial strain. Physical and psychological trauma was associated with revision surgery and antibiotic treatment. Patients had strong preferences for treatment options, emphasising impact of surgery, side effects of antibiotics and duration of treatment as key considerations. Although eradication of infection was important, patients felt that reducing impact of treatment was high priority and identified a need for more support. Surgeons' treatment decisions focused on patient characteristics and nature of infection to prioritise eradication of infection. During patients' recovery surgeons' were concerned about possible return of infection and patients' mobility and function. Conclusion. Infection after joint replacement causes physical and psychological trauma. Balancing patients' preferences for reducing impact of treatment with surgeons' emphasis on eradication of infection should be an important consideration in care. There is also need to develop new interventions to support patients with infection. Level of evidence. Level 3 – Qualitative Research. Funding statement. This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (grant number: RP-PG-1210-12005). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Ethics. This study has been given a favourable opinion for conduct in the NHS by the National Research Ethics Service Committee South West – Exeter 14/SW/0072

Summary Statement. Routine metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty is not essential and the use of cobalt chromium or stainless steel implants is recommended regardless of the patient's metal allergy status. Introduction. This study was undertaken to obtain a consensus amongst joint arthroplasty experts with regards to metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty and the choice of implant in patients with potential metal allergy. Patients & Methods. A web based Delphi consensus study was used including orthopaedic surgeons that had previously published on the topic of knee, hip or shoulder arthroplasty. Two rounds of questionnaires were sent via electronic mail. Consensus was considered if agreement was 60% or higher. Results. 18 surgeons responded to the first and 17 to the second round of questionnaires. There was consensus that patients having metal arthroplasty surgery should not be routinely questioned about metal allergy prior to surgery. There was consensus that patch testing is not necessary even if metal allergy is suspected. Most respondents agreed in proceeding with cobalt chromium or stainless steel implant in patients suspected of metal allergy regardless of the results of cutaneous patch testing. Discussion/Conclusion. This consensus study suggests that routine metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty is not essential. The use of traditional cobalt chromium/stainless steel implants is recommended regardless of the patient's metal allergy status

Summary Statement. This paper is the first to compare the results of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision surgery between cases with explained pain and cases with unexplained pain. Revision surgery for unexplained pain usually results in a less favourable outcome. Introduction. Although it is suggested in literature that results of UKA to TKA revision surgery improve when the mechanism of failure is understood, a comparative study regarding this topic is lacking. Methods. All cases of revision surgery in two hospitals in the Netherlands were listed retrospectively. Fifteen cases with unexplained pain were listed in group A and 15 cases with a cause for pain in group B. Oxford knee scores (OKS), visual analogue scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction one year after revision surgery were compared. Results. OKS improved from 19 to 25 within group A and from 23 to 38 within group B. VAS improved from 7, 7 to 5, 4 within group A and from 7, 4 to 1, 7 within group B. The difference in outcome between both groups is statistically significant, p=0,022 for OKS and p=0,002 for VAS. Subgroup analysis in group A, performed in order to define a patient factor that predicts outcome of revision surgery in case of unexplained pain, showed no preoperative differences between both subgroups. Discussion. These results are important to properly inform patients about what to expect of revision surgery, highlighting that UKA to TKA revision surgery for unexplained pain generally results in a less favourable outcome

Summary Statement. This experimental study showed that platelet rich fibrin matrix can improve muscle regeneration and long-term vascularization without local adverse effects. Introduction. Even though muscle injuries are very common, few scientific data on their effective treatment exist. Growth Factors (GFs) may have a role in accelerating muscle repair processes and a currently available strategy for their delivery into the lesion site is the use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The present study is focused on the use of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM), as a source of GFs. Materials and Methods. Bilateral muscular lesions were created on the longissimus dorsi muscle of Wistar rats. One side of the lesion was filled with a PRFM while the contralateral was left untreated (controls). Animals were sacrificed at 5, 10, 40 and 60 days from surgery. Histological, immunohistochemical and histomorphometric analyses were performed to evaluate muscle regeneration, neovascularization, fibrosis and inflammation. The presence of metaplasic zones, calcifications and heterotopic ossification were also assessed. Results. PRFM treated muscles exhibited an improved muscular regeneration, an increase in neovascularization, and a slight reduction of fibrosis compared with controls. No differences were detected for inflammation. Metaplasia, ossification and heterotopic calcification were not detected. Conclusions. This preliminary morphological experimental study shows that PRFM use can improve muscle regeneration and long-term vascularization. Since autologous blood products are safe, PRFM may be a useful and handily product in clinical treatment of muscle injuries

Summary Statement. This is the first report of a new technique for unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision surgery in which patient specific guides are formed based on preoperative CT imaging. This technique can help to make revision surgery less technically demanding. Introduction. Unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty revision surgery can be a technically demanding procedure. Joint line restoration, rotation and augmentations can cause difficulties. This study describes a new technique in which single way fitting guides serve to position knee system cutting blocks. Methods. Preoperatively an image of the distal femur and proximal tibia are formed using CT-scanning. This image is used to create patient specific guides that fit in one single position on the contours of the bone and prosthesis in situ. These guides are fixed with pins and thereafter removed. The pins determine the position of the cutting blocks. Ten consecutive revisions were performed using this technique. Results. All guides fitted well. All femoral prostheses were properly inserted using this technique. One proximal tibia however did not have not enough bonestock so that conversion to intramedular referencing was performed. This was to be expected after the preoperative planning. Postoperative position of the prosthesis was good in all cases. Discussion. This new technique can help to make unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty less demanding. Problems such as the need for augmentations can be predicted in the preoperative planning. Radiation issues due to CT scanning are limited. The instrumentation needs to be redesigned in order to make this technique work in cases with minimal bonestock present

Summary Statement. Bio-impedance analysis (BIA) provides a convenient method for the estimation of whole body and segmental measurement of skeletal muscle mass (SMM). BIA-measured SMM parameters may be effectively used for the normalisation of muscle strength and removing body-size dependence. Introduction. Despite an increasing interest in using bio-impedance analysis (BIA) for the estimation of segmental skeletal muscle mass (SMM); existing data is sparse. On the other hand, there is a need for better understanding of the influence of SMM on gender-related differences in muscle strength. Using BIA technique, this study aimed to measure the SMM, determine its correlation with muscle strength, and examine its relation with gender-related differences in muscle strength. Patients and Methods. Segmental and whole body SMM (3-segment electrode configuration) and maximum voluntary contraction in five distinct shoulder planes (forward flexion, abduction in scapular plane, abduction in coronal plane, and internal- and external rotation) were measured in 45 healthy participants (22 males, 23 females) with a mean age of 30.3 years. Independent t-tests and Pearson Correlation test were applied for comparative and correlational analysis, respectively. Results. All muscle-related parameters including muscle volume, SMM, and SMM index were significantly different between men and women. There was a significant gender-related difference in the absolute shoulder strength but not after normalisation to SMM. A strong correlation was found between strength and SMM and in-between strength measurements. Conclusion. BIA provided a convenient method for SMM estimation. SMM parameters may be effectively used for strength normalisation allowing comparisons of individuals with differing body masses. Strong correlations between SMM and muscle strength supported the use of BIA in assessing muscle size-strength relations and its applicability in muscle function assessments

Summary Statement. In this study we suggested a possible role of prion proteins genes in osteosarcoma. Therefore, the inhibition of prion proteins expression must be tested because it could represent a new approach to the molecular treatment of osteosarcoma. Introduction. Although osteosarcoma is the most common bone malignancy, the molecular and cellular mechanisms influencing its pathogenesis have remained elusive. Prion proteins (PRNP and PRND), known mostly for its involvement in neurodegenerative spongiform encephalopathies, have been recently demonstrated to be involved in resistance to apoptosis, tumorigenesis, proliferation and metastasis. Patients & Methods. The main aim of research was to study whether prion proteins were over-expressed in human osteosarcoma, and if prion proteins could have a role also in osteosarcomas. We evaluated differential gene expression between 22 cases of osteosarcoma and 40 cases of normal bone specimens through cDNA microarray analysis spanning a substantial fraction of the human genome. Results. PRNP and PRND are significantly over-expressed in osteosarcoma. PRNP and PRND appear involved with some important genes related to tumorigenesis and apoptosis. PRNP is linked to PTK2, RBBP9 and TGFB1 while PRND is linked to TNFSF10, BCL2A1, NFKB2 and TP53RK. Discussion/Conclusion. Increased expression on Affymetrix arrays of prion proteins seems to be associated with the development of osteosarcoma. Prions seem to induce a negative regulation of apoptosis, thus promoting osteosarcoma development and progression. Osteosarcoma is a very aggressive tumor and even after modern chemotherapy and excision of tumors efforts are needed to improve clinical outcome. Since Prion proteins seem to be related to osteosarcoma development, their inhibition could represent a new approach to the molecular treatment of osteosarcoma

Summary Statement. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a multifactorial skeletal disorder. S100A9 represseses angiogenesis and vessel integrity in ONFH. It also may function as a marker of diagnosis in ONFH. Introduction. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a multifactorial skeletal disorder characterised by ischemic deterioration, bone marrow edema and eventually femoral head collapse and joint destruction. Several surgical, pharmaceutical and non-invasive biophysical modalities have been employed to alleviate this joint disorder. Our proteomic analysis showed that ONFH patients displayed increased expression of S100A9 protein when compared with healthy volunteers. This study is designed to evaluate the pathogenesis of S100A9 on the patients of ONFH. Patients & Methods. We collected 56 patients with ONFH including stage I, II, III and IV and 14 health volunteers. 20 ml of peripheral venous blood is drawn from each subject or prior to general anesthesia for hip arthroplasty. We compared the ELISA of S100A9, Osteocalcin, TRAP-5b, sVCAM-1. Immunohistochemistry of S100A9, vWF and VEGF are compared using femoral head harvested from late stages of ONFH and femoral neck fracture when received hip arthroplasty. In vitro angiogenic assay was performed by tube formation assay. Results. There were significant elevation of S100A9 in the serum of ONFH patients then in healthy volunteers. sVCAM-1 and TRAP-5b were increased and Osteocalcin was decreased in ONFH patient when comapred with healthy volunteers. The expression of S100A9 protein in ONFH tissue was significantly higher than femoral neck fracture tissue. In tube formation assay, we found S100A9 and the serum of ONFH patient supressed angiogenesis in vascular endothelial cell culture. Discussion/Conclusion. The expression of S100A9 significantly increased in the serum and femoral head tissue of patients with ONFH. S100A9 also supressed angiogenesis expression. The results indicated that S100A9 represseses angiogenesis and vessel integrity in ONFH. It also may function as a marker of diagnosis in ONFH

Summary Statement. We used three-dimensional software to assess different anatomic variables in the femur. The canal of Femur twisted slightly below the lesser trochanter in cases with a larger angle of anteversion. Introduction. Accurate positioning of the joint prosthesis is essential for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). To aid in tailoring of the prosthesis, we used three-dimensional software to assess different anatomic variables in the femur. Patients & Methods. We used CT imaging data of the unaffected normal side of the 25 patients (22 females, age range 30 to 81 years) who underwent THA in 2012 in our hospital. The femur was reconstructed from CT data and measured using three-dimensional modeling software (Mimics 16.0 Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). We measured ellipse fitting to the medullary canal in the axial plane of the femur at 20-mm intervals. The angle between the major axis of those ellipses and the axis of the femoral neck was measured and expressed as the canal rotation. The distance between the lesser trochanter and the center of the femoral head was measured along the Z axis. Results. The major axes of the ellipses direct to medial, front and medial side in the level of epiphysis, above isthmus and distal portion respectively in all cases. The maximum rotated level was above isthmus. The rotation angle in the proximal portion ranged from 36 to 84 degrees (mean, 60.6 degrees, SD ± 12.1). The rotation angle of the distal portion ranged from 71 to 95 degrees (mean, 86.1 degrees, SD ± 6.1). Discussion/Conclusion. The torsion of the canal varied more widely between individuals in the proximal portion than did the distal portion. In addition, the torsion of the proximal aspect, although more variable, was on average smaller when the angle of anteversion was large. Because the canal twisted slightly below the lesser trochanter in cases with a larger angle of anteversion, it is suggested that attention to the degree of anteversion of a flat prosthesis stem is warranted