The NZ Standards of Service Provision for Sarcoma patients were developed by the NZ Sarcoma working group and published by the Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2013. Although not formally enacted by the MOH we aimed to determine the impact of these published standards and referral pathways on disease-specific survival of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma in NZ. The Middlemore Musculoskeletal Tumour Unit database was searched. Patients referred for treatment in our centre with a diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma in the five-year period before (n=115) and after (n=155) were included. We excluded patients with bone sarcomas and retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. The rate of referral after inappropriate treatment reduced after implementation of the Standards (24% vs 12%, p=0.010). The number of patients referred with tumours larger than 50mm decreased (74.8% vs 72.3%, p=0.021) and fewer had metastases at diagnosis (11.3% vs 3.2%, p=0.017). Mortality was lower in the group after introduction of the Standards (45% vs 30%, p=0.017). The estimated disease-specific survival curve between the two groups shows a trend towards increased survival in the post-standards group, although not reaching statistical significance. Local recurrence rate and metastasis rate after definitive treatment were similar between the two groups. Patients had a shorter duration of symptoms before referral in the post-Standards group although this was not statistically significant. Since implementation of the Standards, patients have been referred more promptly, with fewer inappropriate treatments. The time to mortality curve indicates a trend towards improved disease-specific survival. We conclude that the pathway for investigation and referral for this condition has become clearer, supporting the ongoing use of the Sarcoma Standards, and that these should be formally implemented by the MOH

Introduction. The number of young and more active patients requiring total knee replacement (TKR) is increasing. Preclinical evaluation and understanding the long-term failure of TKR is therefore important. Preclinical wear simulation of TKR is usually performed according to the International Standards Organization (ISO) recommendations. Two international standards for preclinical wear simulation of TKRs have been developed so that the anterior-posterior (AP) translation and internal-external (IE) rotation can be driven in either force or displacement control. However, the effects of using different control regimes on the kinematics and wear of the same TKR have not been investigated. The current study investigated the kinematics, contact mechanics and wear performance of a TKR when running under ISO force and displacement control standards using an experimentally validated computational model. Materials/Methods. Three different ISO control standards were investigated using a size C Sigma curved TKR (DePuy, UK), with moderately cross-linked UHMWPE curved inserts; ISO-14243-3-2004, ISO-14243-3-2014 and ISO- 14243-1-2009. Axial force and flexion-extension angle are common for the three standards. AP and IE motions are displacement controlled in ISO-14243-3-2004 and ISO-14243-3-2014, with the only difference being a reversal of AP polarity between the two standards, and are force controlled in ISO-14243-1-2009. The test setup and soft tissue constraints were defined in accordance with ISO recommendations. The wear model was based on the modification of Archard's law where the wear volume is defined as a function of contact area, sliding distance, cross-shear and contact stress. The simulation framework has been independently validated against experimental wear rates under three different standard and highly demanding daily activities (Abdelgaied et al. 2018). Results. Reversing AP in the displacement control ISO-2014, compared to ISO-2004, resulted in high contact stresses of more than 70 MPa in the posterior direction. The predicted AP and IE from the force control ISO-2009 were in different directions and magnitudes to ISO-2014 AP and IE. The predicted wear rates were 1.8, 2.0, and 5.5 [mm. 3. /mc] for ISO-14243-3-2004, ISO-14243-3-2014 and ISO-14243-1-2009 respectively. Discussion. Reversing AP in the displacement control ISO-2014, without revising the femoral centre of rotation, resulted in high stress edge loading in the posterior direction, due to femoral rollback, and more than 10% increase in wear rate compared to ISO-2004. The predicted AP and IE from the force control ISO-2009 had different polarities and magnitudes to the corresponding displacement control ISO-2014 AP and IE. In addition, the predicted wear rate under the force control ISO-2009 was more than double that measured under displacement control standards due to the increased AP and IE motions predicted under the force control standard. In addition to the previous validation of the model, the predicted wear rate under the force control ISO-2009 of 5.5 mm. 3. /mc was within the 95% confidence limits of the reported experimental wear rate for the same TKR of 4.71±1.29 mm. 3. /mc (Johnston et al. 2018) which gives more confidence in the model. Conclusion. The study showed significant differences between ISO force and displacement control standards and between ISO displacement standards with different AP polarities. These differences should therefore be considered when choosing a control regime for preclinical simulation of TKR

The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have partnered to advance international patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collection and reporting standards for hip and knee arthroplasty. This project is part of the OECD's Patient-Reported Indicator Survey (PaRIS) initiative, which aims to address the need for internationally comparable patient-reported outcome and experience measures in order to better monitor health system performance and drive continuous improvement. PROMs are in varying stages of implementation across OECD health systems, with differences in collection and reporting practices across existing programs.

CIHI and the OECD are leading an international working group for PROMs in hip and knee replacement surgery in order to build consensus on PROMs data collection standards and develop indicators for international reporting. Working group members include patient representatives, clinicians, national arthroplasty registries, the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR), experts in PROMs measurement, and government representatives of several OECD member countries. Activities of the working group focus on two main priorities: 1) Use existing PROMs programs to maximize pilot comparable reporting in OECD's Health at a Glance 2019 report, and 2) Advance new PROMs standards and data collection to maximize comparable reporting beyond Health at a Glance 2019.

An environmental scan of PROMs in hip and knee arthroplasty found that a number of countries are collecting this data, however, there are variations in survey instruments as well as administration and reporting methods within and across countries. As part of priority 1, the working group has achieved consensus on a number of aspects around pilot reporting. The project is compiling data from existing PROMs programs in order to report results in the Health at a Glance 2019 publication.

For priority 2, the most notable challenge is establishing an agreement across countries on common survey tools, as well as a minimum data set that works for all, given the disparities of existing collection across countries. Many international programs lack the flexibility to change PROMs tools or collections methods, and have concerns regarding the break in trend for PROMs data within their own countries if they were to change methods. The project is exploring the use of crosswalks and other opportunities for comparable reporting, such as the use of single-item anchor questions. To date, the working group continues to develop consensus on international standards for PROMs collection and reporting. Results of the international consensus building and work to date will be shared.

PROMs incorporate the patient's perspective into the delivery of treatments and care – such as hip and knee arthroplasty – that aim to improve a patient's quality of life. Alignment of standards in PROMs collection across countries will make comparable data available for reporting, in order to inform quality improvement initiatives within health systems to provide better care for patients. CIHI and the OECD will continue to work with member countries to develop international data collection and reporting standards for PROMs, and encourage the adoption of common approaches across countries.

Objective

Guidelines published by the British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) and Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) recommend urgent MRI imaging and intervention in individuals suspected of having CES. The need for an evidence based protocol is driven by a lack of 24/7 MRI services and centralisation of neurosurgery to tertiary centres, compounded by CES's significant medico-legal implications. We conducted an audit to evaluate the pathway for suspected CES in BCUHB West between 2018 and 2021.

Dedication to quality has a longstanding tradition within the Schulthess Clinic. Pioneering documentation Maurice E. Müller initiated an International Documentation & Evaluation System (IDES) in the era of hip replacement becoming an increasingly wide spread and standardized procedure. Starting in 1984, IDES was used to document each and every hip replacement and as of 1995 also for every knee arthroplasty performed. Norbert Gschwend became the driving authority in the clinic for standardizing documentation and regular long term follow-up intervals for all patients.

With increasing interest in patient reported outcomes (PROMs) a shift took place in the basic conception and electronic means (iPads) were introduced in 2012 to let patients complete their part of questionnaires, i.e. EQ-5D, OHS, OKS, UCLA & WOMAC while the clinical part was addressed in the same manner using HHS & KSS.

Optimizing user experience while answering routine questions and allowing for the physician to quickly enter required data without the numbing experience of ever same paper forms largely increased the return on information. This approach also guarantees for complete data sets, often a problem when using pen and paper.

Using these modern tools in combination with a refined recall procedure, we today show follow-up rates of well over 90% in the first post-operative years vs rates of 80% or less prior to introduction.

As of late 2012 the Swiss implant registry for knees & hips was introduced and here again we today use iPads with an app specifically designed to quickly document and register all operations on a daily base, reducing the chore of using paper or web based on line options from 3 to 10 minutes per operation to a mere 20 seconds, fully plausibilized and in this way never returned for corrections.

Pooling this data allows not only for generalized and stringent quality control but also facilitates spotting aberrant trends in the sense of an early warning system within our clinic with regard to procedures and implants.

Pioneering this approach to facilitate & perfect all documentation related procedures we aspire towards an elevated quality level in reporting to help sustain & guarantee patient satisfaction despite the high day-by-day volume.

Wear testing of THR has chaperoned generations of improved UHMWPE bearings into wide clinical use. However, previous in vitro testing failed to screen many metal-on-metal hips which failed. This talk tours hip wear testing and associated standards, giving an assortment of THR wear test results from the author's laboratory as examples.

Two international hip wear-simulator standards are used: ISO-14242-1 (anatomic configuration) and ISO-14242-3 (orbital-bearing). Both prescribe 5 million (MC) force-motion cycles involving cross-shear synchronized with compression simulating walking gate of ideally aligned THRs. ISO-14242-1 imposes flexion (flex), abduction-adduction (ad-ab) and internal-external (IE) rotations independently and simultaneously. An orbital-bearing simulator more simply rotates either a tilted femoral head or acetabular component, switching from flexion-dominated to ad-ab-dominated phases in each cycle with some IE. In the latter, the acetabular component is typically placed below the femoral head to accentuate abrasive conditions, trapping third-body-wear debris.

Wear is measured (ISO-14242-2) gravimetrically (or volumetrically in some hard-on-hard bearings). Wear-rate ranges from negligible to >80mg/MC beyond what causes osteolysis. This mode-1 adhesive wear can therefore “discriminate” to screen hip designs-materials in average conditions.

Stair-climbing, sitting, squatting and other activities may cause THR edge-loading and even impingement with smaller head-to-neck ratios or coverage angle, naturally worse in metal-on metal hips. Deformation of thin acetabular components during surgical impaction may cause elevated friction or metal-metal contact, shedding more metal-ions and accelerating failure. Surgical misalignments in inclination angle, version and tilt can make this worse, even during modest activities in hard-on-hard bearings. Abrasive particulate debris from bone or bone-cement, hydroxyapatite, neck-impingement, normal wear, or corrosion can compound the above. Such debris can scratch the femoral head surface, or embed in the UHMWPE liner compromising the wear of even metal-on-plastic hips.

Much of the belated standardization activity for higher demand hip testing is in response to the metal-metal failures. ASTM F3047M is a recent non-prescriptive guide for what more rigorous testing can generally be done. Third-body particulate can be intentionally introduced or random scratching of the femoral component surface in extra abrasion testing. Also, the compressive load can be increased, more frequent start-stops to disrupt lubrication, and steepening acetabular shell-liner angles to reduce contact area and cause edge-loading, made harsher when combined with version misalignment. Transient separation can occur between head and liner during the swing phase in a lax THR joint with low coverage angle and misalignments; the separated head impacts the liner rim when reseating. An edge-loading ISO test is currently being discussed where (so-called) “microseparation” to a known distance is directly imposed by a lateral spring force in a hip simulator.

Friction testing of a THR in a pendulum-like setup undergoing flexion or abduction swings is being discussed in the ASTM, and so have multi-dimensional THR friction measurements during a long-term wear test simultaneously measuring and separating friction of three rotational (flex, ad-ab, and IE) axes.

THR wear test methods continue to evolve to address more challenges such as novel duo-mobility THR designs, where UHMWPE bearings cannot be removed for gravimetric wear measurements.

Bowel management following joint replacement is often neglected leading lot of patient distress, with the advent of the enhanced orthopedic rehabilitation program, there is a need of a guideline to ensure prompt and quick recovery of bowel habits before discharge. Our aim was to identify the incidence of constipation in joint replacement patients, to evaluate the current practice of bowel management and formulate a protocol for management of constipation to improve the practice. We conducted a prospective study of 50 patients who underwent joint replacement procedures at our institute between September and October 2015. Following initial audit, we formulated a protocol for bowel management, and performed a re-audit by collecting a prospective data of 50 patients. The statistical analysis was done and calculating the mean and standard deviation for continuous variable and Fischer's exact test was used and significance level was set at 0.05. Incidence of constipation was 88% and laxatives were prescribed in 42%. More importantly, there was no correlation between constipation and pre operative fasting (p Value 0.33), post operative fasting (p Value 0.1822), type of surgery (p value 1.00) and type of anaesthesia (p Value 0.27). Following introduction of bowel protocol the laxative prescription increased to 98% (Prophylactic in 81%), consequently the incidence of constipation reduced to 18%. Implementing bowel protocol significantly will improve the patient care and reduce the rate of complications.

Aim

Peri-prosthetic joint infection is a serious and expensive complication of joint arthroplasty. Theatre discipline has infection prevention at its core with multiple studies correlating increased door opening with surgical site infection. The WHO, NICE and Philadelphia Consensus all advocate minimal theatre traffic. The Dutch Health Inspectorate consider >5 door openings per procedure excessive.

Studies of operation notes have shown they can vary in quality and affect patient safety. This audit compares the quality of operation notes against standards set by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Orthopaedic Association.

Information from operation notes was collected prospectively over a two-week period. All operations performed were included and trainees from the region coordinated data collection in 9 hospitals.

Data from 1091 operation notes was reviewed. A number of standards were nearly met including legibility (98.4%), the name of operating surgeon (99.3%) and operation title (99.1%). However a number of standards were not met and those with potential patient safety implications include availability on the ward (88.8%), documentation of type of anaesthetic used (78.6%), diagnosis (73.4%) and findings (80.1%). In addition, the postoperative instructions recorded the need for and type of postoperative antibiotics or venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in only 49.7% and 48.8% of cases respectively.

The quality of operation notes studied across the region in this period was variable. Software programmes meant some hospitals had better results for date, time and patient identification details. Following this study, awareness of the standards combined with additional local measures may improve the quality of operation notes.

Generic walking profiles applied to mechanical knee simulators are the gold standard in wear testing of total knee replacements (TKRs). Recently, there was a change in the international standard (ISO) for knee wear testing (ISO 14243-3): the direction of motion in the anterior/posterior (AP) and internal/external (IE) directions were reversed. The effects of this change have not been investigated, therefore it is not known whether results generated by following this new standard can be compared to historical wear tests which used the old standard. Using a finite element analysis (FEA) model of a TKR in parallel with an energy based wear model and adaptive remeshing, we investigated differences in wear between the newest ISO standard developed in 2014, and the previous ISO standard developed in 2004.

CAD models of a left sided NexGen Cruciate Retaining (CR) TKR (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) were used to create the FEA model (Figure 1). The loads and motions specified by simulator standards ISO 14243-3(2004) and ISO 14243-3(2014) were applied to the model. Analyses were run using ABAQUS v6.13-2 Standard (Dassault Systèmes, Waltham, MA). 8 node hexahedral elements were used to model the UHMWPE component. The contact was modeled as penalty contact, with the friction coefficient set to 0.04 on the articular surface. The cobalt chromium molybdenum femoral component was modeled as a rigid surface, utilizing a mix of 2^nd order quadrilaterals and tetrahedrons. Wear of the polyethylene (PE) component was predicted to 1,000,000 cycles using a previously published frictional energy-based wear model. The wear model, developed from data generated in wheel-on-flat tests, utilizes two parameters defining the frictional energy required to remove a unit volume of material both parallel (3.86E8 J/mm³) and perpendicular (3.55E7 J/mm³) to the primary polyethylene fibril direction. Primary fibril direction for the analysis was set to the AP direction. Wear for each simulation of a gait cycle was scaled to 500,000 cycles. Two gait cycles were simulated representing 1,000,000 cycles in total. Adaptive remeshing was driven by the wear model, with the mesh being updated every time increment to simulate material ablation. The time step size was variable with a maximum of 0.01s.

The FEA predicted higher wear rates for the newest ISO standard (7.34mg/million cycles) compared to the previous standard (6.04mg/million cycles) (Figure 2). Comparing the predicted wear scars (Figure 3), the new version of the standard covered a larger percentage of the total articular surface, with wear being more spread out as opposed to localized. This is more similar to what is seen in patient retrievals.

The results of the study suggest that major differences between the old and the new ISO standard exist and therefore historical wear results are not comparable to newly obtained results. In addition, this study demonstrates the utility of FEA in wear analysis, though the wear model needs further work and validation before it can be used as a supplement to simulator testing. Validation of the wear model against simulator tests and pin-on-disk experiments is currently underway.

For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Quality assurance for training in trauma and orthopaedics was provided by the JCHST through the SAC for Trauma and Orthopaedics. To date there have been written SAC standards; some are compulsory and others advisory and will generate requirements or recommendations to change if unmet on inspection. There has been a major change in the way postgraduate training is monitored and quality assured, with the formation of the PMETB, which now has the combined responsibility for all postgraduate training.

The aims and objectives of our study were to measure the effectiveness of the current quality assurance system for training in Trauma and Orthopaedics, and to determine the reduction in the number of unmet compulsory standards at the end of the visits process and how effectively these requirements were implemented. We also identified the deficiencies in each component of training and determined the current general profile of the quality of training in Trauma and Orthopaedics. The inspection visits, progress and revisit reports were collected from training regions that were visited after the standards were implemented.

In 109 units, in the 3 years studied, the inspection process reduced the overall unmet standards from a mean of 14.8% (10.3-19.2%) to 8.9% (6.5%-12.7%). The number of unmet requirement per unit fell from 4.6 to 2.8 (p<0.05). 27% of units did not improve. Overall 15% of standards were deficient, least in Scottish units and most in Irish units. Currently registrars do 1.4 trauma lists, 2.8 elective lists, 1.3 fracture clinics and 2.1 elective clinics per week. This is the first multi-regional study of a national accreditation process. Quality assurance requires standards setting and rectification. These findings are important for the imminent restructuring by the Postgraduate Medical Education Board.

Introduction. There are concerns that patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) currently used for adults requiring, undergoing or after undergoing lower limb reconstruction (LLR) are not adequately capturing the range of experiences important to these patients. The ‘Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction’ (PROLLIT) study developed a conceptual framework of outcomes identified as important and relevant by adult LLR patients. This review explored whether existing PROMs address these outcomes, and exhibit content validity in this population. Materials & Methods. A range of key PROMs was selected (n=32). Systematic and hand-searches were employed to find studies assessing content validity of these PROMs in the adult LLR population, along with PROM content and development information. A systematic review of content validity of the measures was carried out following ‘COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments’ (COSMIN) guidance, alongside conceptual mapping of the content of the PROMs against the PROLLIT conceptual framework. Results. The searches uncovered very few content validity studies assessing the PROMs when applied in adult LLR patients. The COSMIN review found that these measures lacked content validity when applied in this population. The conceptual mapping found that PROMs did not capture all concepts identified as important and relevant in the PROLLIT framework. Conclusions. Existing PROMs applied in the adult LLR population lack content validity and fail to adequately capture relevant outcomes for this patient group. There is a need for a new, dedicated PROM designed for adult LLR patients

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic presents an unprecedented burden on global healthcare systems, and existing infrastructures must adapt and evolve to meet the challenge. With health systems reliant on the health of their workforce, the importance of protection against disease transmission in healthcare workers (HCWs) is clear. This study collated responses from several countries, provided by clinicians familiar with practice in each location, to identify areas of best practice and policy so as to build consensus of those measures that might reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to HCWs at work. Methods. A cross-sectional descriptive survey was designed with ten open and closed questions and sent to a representative sample. The sample was selected on a convenience basis of 27 senior surgeons, members of an international surgical society, who were all frontline workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was reported according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist. Results. Responses were received by all 27 surgeons from 22 countries across six continents. A number of the study respondents reported COVID-19-related infection and mortality in HCWs in their countries. Differing areas of practice and policy were identified and organized into themes including the specification of units receiving COVID-19 patients, availability and usage of personal protective equipment (PPE), other measures to reduce staff exposure, and communicating with and supporting HCWs. Areas more specific to surgery also identified some variation in practice and policy in relation to visitors to the hospital, the outpatient department, and in the operating room for both non-urgent and emergency care. Conclusion. COVID-19 presents a disproportionate risk to HCWs, potentially resulting in a diminished health system capacity, and consequently an impairment to population health. Implementation of these recommendations at an international level could provide a framework to reduce this burden

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCH) are the most common fractures sustained following a fall on an outstretched hand in healthy children, and one of the leading causes of hospital admission and surgical intervention. With increasing severity of injury, treatment options become more invasive and the potential for long lasting complications increases. The aim of this study is to examine the causes and circumstances surrounding SCH in public play spaces particularly to determine whether or not the playground equipment implicated in injurious falls is compliant with Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standards. Children aged 6–12 years who sustained SCH while playing at a public play space between 2017 and 2019 were recruited from the paediatric orthopaedic clinic. Public playgrounds within a 50 km radius of the clinic were visited by research assistants. Using GPS coordinates from photographs taken by the children at the site of injury or play structures identified by the children using Google Maps, play structure type, dimensions, height of fall, and the type and depth of the surface material were collected from each site and compared to the relevant CSA standard. Of the 89 SCH injuries reported during the recruitment period, 49 (55%) occurred on public play structures. Thirty-nine injury sites, representing 42 SCH cases, were accessible to conduct site visits and were included in the analysis. Thirteen children (31%) sustained Type One, 19 (45%) were Type Two, and 10 (24%) were Type Three SCHs. The mean child age at injury was 7.13 years. Of the 42 SCH cases, 37 sites had woodchips surfacing (88%); three had rubber (7%), one had cement (2%), and one had sand (2%). Of the 36 sites where woodchip depth measurements could be obtained, only seven (19%) met the minimum CSA depth. Out of the 42 SCH cases, 29 injuries (69%) involved upper body equipment (i.e. monkey bars or similar) and track rides. Fourteen of these 29 injuries (48%) occurred on structures that did not meet CSA standards for fall height. All rotating play structures had less than half of the required clearance between the components. Eighty-six percent of SCH cases occurred in playgrounds where at least one of the required CSA standards was not met. Woodchip surfacing was of particular concern because 81% of woodchip surface depths failed to meet CSA standards. Of the 14 injuries where fall height did not meet CSA standards, 11 (79%) also did not meet minimum CSA surface depth. Field investigation into the characteristics of playgrounds in which children sustain SCH can guide preventative policy and practice measures. Municipalities and school boards should be alerted to the need for regular maintenance of woodchip playground surfacing, in order to remain compliant with the minimum surface depth and prevent serious injuries. Additionally, compliance with minimum surface depths can also decrease fall heights to meet CSA standards. By minimizing the prevalence of SCH injuries occurring on play structures and the need for emergency department visits, the burden to healthcare systems and families of injured children can potentially be reduced

Introduction. Fixation has been shown to be the primary indicator of an implant's long-term success. Failure to achieve attachment, especially in acetabular and TKR, has been attributed to a lack of initial stability and gaps between the implant and bone. Gaps greater than 150 microns allow fibrous tissue to form. Properly addressing implant design features can help avoid adverse outcomes. ASTM International Standards (F1854-09) do not assess the relationship between porosity of the coating and that of cancellous bone, which can lead to an absence of mechanical interlock. This study developed a virtual program that uses human cancellous bone to predict potential skeletal attachment for implants properly placed for TJR. The goal of the Virtual Paradigm was to assess initial contact surface area at the time of implantation. Methods. Seven human femurs and tibias were used. Bones from 11 males and 3 females were used, ages ranging from 40 to 61. Five porous coatings were assessed: Biofoam (Wright Medical), Fiber Mesh, CSTI, Tantalum (Zimmer), and P² (DJO Global). Specimen Processing. Each bone was resected 2 mm beyond the articulating surface into the cancellous host using surgical TKA instruments. The specimens and coatings were embedded in PMMA. For Part 1, the specimens and coatings were cut perpendicular to the neutral axis, displaying a surface view for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For Part 2, the coatings were cross-sectioned for SEM, ground, and polished to optical finish. Imaging: Part 1. The bone and coating sections displaying the surface view were imaged using SEM under backscatter (BSE) at 22x. Three images were taken of each tibia section, resulting in 12 images. Three images were taken of each femur section, resulting in 9 images. Analysis: Part 1. Each bone image was overlaid onto each coating image. Using various computer programs (IQ Materials, Fastone Image Viewer, Corel Photopaint X3), available bone was normalized to 100% and bone-implant contact was marked red (Figure 1). Imaging: Part 2. The cross-sectioned coatings were imaged with SEM-BSE at 30x. For each implant, 3 images were taken and assembled together (Microsoft Research ICE). Analysis: Part 2. Using the programs, bone images were overlaid onto each coating to establish a 200-micron region of initial contact. The surface of the coating within this region was calculated to represent surface roughness (Figure 2). Results. Bone porosity ranged from 14.04%-23.04% in the femur and 11.85%-23.68% in the tibia. Percent contact between the implant and bone ranged from 3.28%-43.47% (Figure 1). Surface roughness ranged from 5.4–11.1 mm (Figure 2). Opening porosity of the coatings ranged from 52.54%-94.97% (Figure 3). Discussion. Long-term success of cementless TJR depends on mechanical stability and bone attachment. This virtual study addressed fixation and contact between coatings and cancellous bone, and it can be used to evaluate innovative materials intended for TJR. This program challenged the limits of ASTM Standards for screening coatings. The results of this study demonstrated that the Virtual Bone-Implant Surface Contact Paradigm could be used in the early phases of implant development and testing to assess clinical success

Aim. There is a theoretical advantage for immediate postoperative start of rifampicin after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Anti-biofilm treatment may be mostly needed during the first postoperative days in order to prevent new biofilm formation. However, there are concerns with regard to development of rifampicin resistance if rifampicin is started too early. Rifampicin monotherapy will rapidly result in rifampicin resistance, but this may not occur when prescribed as part of combination antimicrobial therapy and after thorough surgical debridement. We hypothesized that in this setting the probability of development of rifampicin resistance is very low. We evaluated the frequency of development of rifampicin resistance in patients with acute staphylococcal PJI who were treated with DAIR followed by immediate postoperative start of rifampicin in combination with a betalactam or glycopeptide. Method. During 2003–2014, all patients with an acute staphylococcal PJI were treated with five days of high-dose rifampicin (600mg bid) in combination with at least 6 weeks of betalactam or glycopeptide antibiotics, both started immediately postoperative after DAIR. Clinical outcome and development of rifampicin resistance in patients who failed were monitored. Susceptibility testing for rifampicin was performed by Vitek 2 (Biomerieux). Until 2014, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for rifampicin resistance were applied (S ≤ 1), from 2014 EUCAST criteria (S ≤ 0.06) were applied. Results. Forty-one patients with acute staphylococcal hip (22) of knee (19) PJI were included. Comorbidities were rheumatoid arthritis (22%), diabetes (10%), a tumor prosthesis due to malignancy (34%) and corticosteroid use (27%). Fifteen patients (37%) developed a failure after DAIR. Eight failures were caused by the same staphylococcal species as the initial PJI (six Staphylococcus aureus, two Coagulase-negative staphylococci). In all failures, rifampicin susceptibility of the isolate had not changed. One patient was started on chronic suppressive treatment (not including rifampicin) and had a prosthetic joint removal 18 months later. In this patient, one out of five positive cultures with S. aureus from the removed prosthesis showed a rifampicin resistant strain. In all failures, mean duration between the initial DAIR and failure was 208 days (range 7–636 days). Conclusions. Immediate postoperative start of high-dose rifampicin in combination with betalactam or glycopeptide did not result in rifampicin resistant staphylococci among patient who had a failure with the same staphylococci. These results strongly indicate that immediate postoperative start of rifampicin is safe. Larger studies are needed to prove the clinical benefit of this strategy

Today, hip prostheses are validated with Standards for fatigue testing: The Standard ISO 7206-4 requires to test 6 components at 230daN during 5 × 10. 6. cycles without crack. For the neck region of stemmed femoral components, the Standard ISO 7206-6 requires 6 tests at 534daN during 10 × 10. 6. cycles without crack. But these tests don't provide provide any indication on reliability level for an implantation in population. At the same time, the number of hip prosthesis implantation is growing, patients are implanted younger and younger and they want to be able to maintain a “normal” life. This way the average “loading spectrum” is getting tougher and tougher, due to this modification of the use of prosthesis in comparison with some years ago. On the other hand, there is new materials, new processes (additive manufacturing), new methods (customized stems…) with no feedback on reliability. A method is then necessary to manage the reliability in fatigue for actual and new products. The objective of this study is to establish a statistical distribution of loading of hip prosthesis in order to define at best a minimum value of strength required for a good fatigue design. To define this strength, the Stress-Strength (well known in automotive sector) approach is applied (fig 1). This approach will allow better assess the reliability in a population, depending on the mean strength and the scattering in fatigue. The first step is to establish the distribution of the loads for a hip prosthesis. Then, for a given risk level, the required strength can be defined, knowing the scattering of this strength. The strategy to have the distribution is based on:. In vivo load recordings on hip prosthesis (find on . Orthoload.com. ),. Analysis of frequency of everyday activities,. Activity level of different category of the population,. Statistical distribution of key parameters, like weight, age…. All these data are collected in the literature, and combined, then processed with the software DEFFI. ®. The goal is first to assess the reliability reached by a “nominal” stem and compare it to the reliability described in implant registers. Another goal is to analyse the stress distribution and compare it to standard requests (ISO 7206-6), in order to assess the reliability of an implant that succeeded this standard. A last, this method is a way to define the minimum strength for implants dedicated to particular populations: young and active patients, patients with high Body Weight, etc…. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).