Abstract
Quality assurance for training in trauma and orthopaedics was provided by the JCHST through the SAC for Trauma and Orthopaedics. To date there have been written SAC standards; some are compulsory and others advisory and will generate requirements or recommendations to change if unmet on inspection. There has been a major change in the way postgraduate training is monitored and quality assured, with the formation of the PMETB, which now has the combined responsibility for all postgraduate training.
The aims and objectives of our study were to measure the effectiveness of the current quality assurance system for training in Trauma and Orthopaedics, and to determine the reduction in the number of unmet compulsory standards at the end of the visits process and how effectively these requirements were implemented. We also identified the deficiencies in each component of training and determined the current general profile of the quality of training in Trauma and Orthopaedics. The inspection visits, progress and revisit reports were collected from training regions that were visited after the standards were implemented.
In 109 units, in the 3 years studied, the inspection process reduced the overall unmet standards from a mean of 14.8% (10.3-19.2%) to 8.9% (6.5%-12.7%). The number of unmet requirement per unit fell from 4.6 to 2.8 (p<0.05). 27% of units did not improve. Overall 15% of standards were deficient, least in Scottish units and most in Irish units. Currently registrars do 1.4 trauma lists, 2.8 elective lists, 1.3 fracture clinics and 2.1 elective clinics per week. This is the first multi-regional study of a national accreditation process. Quality assurance requires standards setting and rectification. These findings are important for the imminent restructuring by the Postgraduate Medical Education Board.
