Aims. Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice. Methods. A consensus exercise was conducted involving all the major stakeholders in the patient journey for those with musculoskeletal injury. The consensus exercise primary aim was to seek agreement on a standardized set of terminology for weightbearing instructions. Results. A pre-meeting questionnaire was conducted. The one-day consensus meeting, including patient representatives, identified three agreed terms only to be used in defining the weightbearing status of the patient: 1) non-weightbearing; 2) limited weightbearing; and 3) unrestricted weightbearing. Conclusion. This study represents the first and only exercise in standardizing rehabilitation terminology in orthopaedics, as agreed by all major stakeholders in the patient pathway and the patients themselves. The standardization of language allows for higher-quality and more accurate research to be conducted, and is one small part of the bigger picture in increasing the mobility of patients after orthopaedic injury or surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):1016–1020

Introduction. Individuals with significant hip and knee trauma receive total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) as definitive end-stage procedures. In Aotearoa, injury-related costs, including workers compensation, may be funded by ACC. With a steady increase of arthroplasty procedures in Aotearoa, we aim to understand the magnitude and characteristics of such procedures to inform future healthcare strategies. Method. This is a longitudinal collaborative study from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2020, using ACC and New Zealand Joint Registry databases. Total cost was subcategorised into social and medical cost for analysis. Results. ACC funded 10179 TKA and 5611 THA, amounting to 918 million New Zealand Dollars. Most clients were between 55 and 65 years of age at time of surgery, with greater representation by Male sex and European prioritised ethnicity. Māori and Pacific peoples represent less than 10% of the study population. ACC identified requiring more than 182 days of workers’ compensation as a significant marker for needing additional supports. Risk of this was 21% for TKA and 11% for THA, with risk factors being younger age (RR 0.96), Male sex (TKA RR 1.12, THA RR 1.23), and heavy work-types (TKA RR 1.50, THA RR 1.57). Discussion. Supporting individuals with post-traumatic lower limb arthroplasty is costly. Workers’ compensation contributes to a significant proportion of social expenditure. Risk factors for increased cost utilisation can be used to highlight vulnerable clients and target interventions. Conclusions. This is one of few nationwide studies investigating the healthcare cost of post-traumatic lower limb arthroplasty. We need to focus on injury prevention, targeted treatment, and rehabilitation protocols to improve recovery and reduce time off work. These findings would be of interest to multiple stakeholders

Treatment for hip displacement in children and youth with cerebral palsy (CP) is dependent upon when the problem is detected. Hip surveillance aims to identify hip displacement early through systematic screening and, together with timely orthopaedic intervention, can eliminate the need for salvage hip procedures. Here we report the impact on surgical practice of 1) hip surveillance program advocacy and knowledge translation efforts and 2) initial population-based program implementation. A retrospective review was completed of all children with CP undergoing surgery for hip displacement at a provincial tertiary pediatric hospital in the years 2004 to 2018. Date and type of surgery, age at surgery, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and pre-operative migration percentages (MP) were collected. Surgeries were categorized as soft-tissue release, reconstructive, and salvage procedures. Results were collected for three time periods: historical (September 2004- June 2010), hip surveillance advocacy and knowledge translation (July 2010- August 2015), and post provincial hip surveillance program implementation (September 2015 – December 2018). A total of 261 surgeries on 321 hips were reviewed. The rate of salvage procedures dropped from 29% (24) of surgeries performed in the historical period to 12% (14) during the period that included targeted hip surveillance knowledge translation and development of provincial guidelines. Since implementation of the surveillance program, salvage procedures have accounted for 7% (4) of interventions performed; all of these were in patients new to the province or existing patients. During the three study periods, reconstructive surgeries accounted for 64%, 81%, and 80% of the interventions performed. The mean initial MP at time of reconstructive surgery has decreased from 66% (SD 20%) in the historical time period to 57% (SD 25%) and 57% (SD 22%) in the subsequent time periods. There were a greater number of children at GMFCS levels III and IV in the two more recent time periods suggesting surveillance may assist in identifying children at these levels of impairment. The rate of soft-tissue surgeries was low during all time periods with the number trending higher since program implementation (7%, 7%, 10%). Knowledge translation and use of standardized surveillance guidelines can have a significant impact on the prevalence of salvage hip surgeries. Centers should utilize existing surveillance guidelines and educate key stakeholders about the importance of hip surveillance in the absence of a formal hip surveillance program

OSSTEC is a pre-spin-out venture at Imperial College London seeking industry feedback on our orthopaedic implants which maintain bone quality in the long term. Existing orthopaedic implants provide successful treatment for knee osteoarthritis, however, they cause loss of bone quality over time, leading to more dangerous and expensive revision surgeries and high implant failure rates in young patients. OSSTEC tibial implants stimulate healthy bone growth allowing simple primary revision surgery which will provide value for all stakeholders. This could allow existing orthopaedics manufacturers to capture high growth in existing and emerging markets while offering hospitals and surgeons a safer revision treatment for patients and a 35% annual saving on lifetime costs. For patients, our implant technology could mean additional years of quality life by revising patients to a primary TKA before full revision surgery. Our implants use patent-filed additive manufacturing technology to restore a healthy mechanical environment in the proximal tibia; stimulating long term bone growth. Proven benefits of this technology include increased bone formation and osseointegration, shown in an animal model, and restoration of native load transfer, shown in a human cadaveric model. This technology could help capture the large annual growth (24%) currently seen in the cementless knee reconstruction market, worth $1.2B. Furthermore, analysis suggests an additional market of currently untreated younger patients exists, worth £0.8B and growing by 18% annually. Making revision surgery and therefore treatment of younger patients easier would enable access to this market. We aim to offer improved patient treatment via B2B sales of implants to existing orthopaedic manufacturer partners, who would then provide them with instrumentation to hospitals and surgeons. Existing implant materials provide good options for patient treatments, however OSSTEC's porous titanium structures offer unique competitive advantages; combining options for modular design, cementless fixation, initial bone fixation and crucially long term bone maintenance. Speaking to surgeons across global markets shows that many surgeons are keen to pursue bone preserving surgeries and the use of porous implants. Furthermore, there is a growing demand to treat young patients (with 25% growth in patients younger than 65 over the past 10 years) and to use cementless knee treatments, where patient volume has doubled in the past 4 years and is following trends in hip treatments. Our team includes engineers and consultant surgeons who have experience developing multiple orthopaedic implants which have treated over 200,000 patients. To date we have raised £175,000 for the research and development of these implants and we hope to gain insight from industry professionals before further development towards our aim to begin trials for regulatory approval in 2026. OSSTEC implants provide a way to stimulate bone growth after surgery to reduce revision risk. We hope this could allow orthopaedic manufactures to explore high growth markets while meaning surgeons can treat younger patients in a cost effective way and add quality years to patients' lives

There has been a widespread adoption of training programs or “boot-camps” targeting new surgical residents prior to entrance to the hospital environment. A plethora of studies have shown positive reactions to implementations of “boot camps”. Reaction surveys, however, lack the ability to provide a deeper level of understanding into how and why “boot camps” are seen as effective. The purpose of this study was to develop a rich perspective on the role “boot camps” are perceived to play in resident education. A constructivist approach to qualitative grounded theory methodology, employing iterative semi-structured, in-person, interviews was used to explore the construct of a “boot camp” through the eyes of key stakeholders, including junior surgical residents (n=10), senior surgical residents (n=5), and faculty members (n=5) at a major academic centre. Interviews were coded and analysed thematically using NVIVO software. Three members of the research team coded data independently and compared themes until consensus was reached. A method of constant comparative analysis was utilised throughout the iterative process. Emerging themes were revisited with stakeholders as a measure of rigor. Axial coding of themes was used to discover the overlying purposes embedded in the “boot camp” construct. The overarching themes resonating from participants were ‘anxiety reduction’, ‘cognitive unloading’ and ‘practical logistics’. Resident anxiety was ameliorated through subthemes of ‘social inclusion’, ‘group formation’, ‘confidence building’ and ‘formalisation of expectations’. A resident commented “the nuances of how things work is more stressful than the actual job.” Residents bonded together to create personal and group identities, “forming the identity of who we are as a group”, that shaped ongoing learning throughout training, “right from the beginning we would be able to call on each other.” Junior residents found themselves cognitively unloaded for higher level learning through ‘expectation setting’ and ‘formalised basic skills’; “I knew how the equipment was going to fit together, it allowed me to focus more on what was happening from the operative perspective.” Stakeholders highlighted the importance of positioning “boot camp” at the beginning of residency training, as it directly influenced the point of transition. This highlights the strength of the “boot camp” construct at targeting the challenges associated with discrete moments of transition in the advancement in practice. While surgical preparatory “boot camps” were initially born out of a competency-based framework focused on technical skill development, our findings demonstrate that the benefits outweigh simple improvement in technical ability. The formation of a learner group identity has downstream effects on resident perceptions of anxiety and confidence, while priming for higher-level learning. “Boot camp” then, is re-imagined as an experience of social professional enculturation

The patient's subjective experience of disease is an increasing focus in health care delivery. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is defined as a “functional effect of a medical condition and its consequent treatment”; it is both self-reported and multi-dimensional. While functional outcome is well researched among the soft tissue sarcoma (STS) population, few studies have focused on HRQoL, which gives a broader understanding of the psychological, somatic, social and physical toll of cancer and its treatment from the patient's viewpoint. The biologic and anatomic heterogeneity of sarcomas are considerable, just as the treatments are diverse, we surmise that the indicators of patient HRQoL differ and are not captured in existing generic HRQoL tools for cancer. The study objectives were to explore the domains of HRQoL and functioning in adult patients diagnosed with extremity STS from the patient's perspective from active care through survivorship through qualitative inquiry, so as to form the basis for the development of a patient-derived, sarcoma-specific, preference based HRQoL tool. Study design is a sequential exploratory mixed methods study of patient experience in localized or metastatic adult extremity STS (2007 and 2017). The study was conducted at a high-volume sarcoma centre. Qualitative descriptive design was grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach and aimed at identifying HRQoL domains through in-person and electronic focus groups, and individual semi-structured interviews in both English and French (N=28). The interview guide topics were selected based on existing knowledge about PROs and HRQoL life, including (a) impact of diagnosis on employment or acquisition of academic/vocational skills; (b) physical and psychological functioning; (c) symptom burden; (d) treatment preferences; (e) knowledge of and use of existing resources; (f) impact on family time and resources; and (g) overall experience. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic networks approach using the qualitative software N-Vivo 12. Codes were generated by 2 independent qualitative experts capturing key concepts of HRQoL that is impacted by STS. Basic themes were clustered into organizing themes, and merged into global domains. Attention was paid to deviant cases and within-group dynamics during focus group discussion analysis. Discrepancies or inconsistencies in coding were resolved in consensus meetings. Final sample size was determined when data saturation was reached and no new themes emerged. Qualitative reduction of identified items to reach a consensus framework was facilitated by a moderator during multi-disciplinary panel meetings comprised of sarcoma experts, patient partners, allied health staff and other stakeholders. Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-proven localized or metastatic STS of the extremity participated (69% lower extremity STS; mean age 56 years, 25% with local recurrence, 21% metastatic, 18% amputation). Inductive thematic network analysis revealed five function-related domains HRQoL for patients with STS. The functional domains were mapped to the Wilson & Cleary Model and experience domains were mapped to the Picker Institute's Through Patient's Eyes model. This is a critical step toward developing disease specific outcome measures. Patient-centered research is crucial to understanding the impact of surgery, adjuvant therapy and the associated complications for patients with extremity STS, and thereby improving the quality of care provision. This study offers a unique perspective on what domains and sub domains are most impactful on HRQoL and provides the basis for our on-going development of a disease-specific, preference-based HRQoL measure

Introduction. With many stakeholders, healthcare decisions are complex. However, patient interests should be prioritized. This maximizes healthcare value (quality divided by cost), simultaneously minimizing costs (objective) and maximizing quality (subjective). Unfortunately, even ‘high value’ procedures like total knee arthroplasty (TKA) suffer from recovery assessment subjectivity (i.e. high assessment variability) and increasing costs. High TKA costs and utilization yield high annual expenditures (∼$22B), including postoperative physical therapy (PT) accounting for ∼10% of total costs (∼$2.3B annually). Post-TKA PT is typically homogenous across subjects ensuring most recover, however recent work shows outcomes unimpacted by PT. Accordingly, opportunities exist improving healthcare value by simultaneously reducing unnecessary PT expenditures and improving outcomes. However, discerning recovery completion relies on discrete ROM measures captured clinically and subjective clinician experience (i.e. intuition about recovery). Accordingly, our goal was developing objective post-TKA performance assessment methods utilizing gait knee ROM and statistical analyses to categorize patient recovery (‘accelerated,’ ‘delayed,’ or ‘normal’). Methods. We first established statistical reasons for current post-TKA rehabilitation including risk-reward tradeoffs between incorrectly ascribing ‘poor recovery’ to well-recovering patients (T1 error) or ‘good recovery’ to poorly-recovering patients (T2 error) using methods described by Mudge et al. and known TKA volumes/rehabilitation costs. Next, previously captured gait ROM data from well-healed patients was utilized establishing standard recovery curves. These were then utilized to assess newly captured patient recovery. Following IRB approval, we prospectively captured gait ROM from 10 TKA patients (3M, 69±13 years) 1-week pre-TKA and 6-weeks immediately post-TKA. Performance was compared to recovery curves via control charts/Shewhart rules (daily performance) as well as standard deviation thresholds (weekly performance) establishing recovery as ‘accelerated,’ ‘delayed,’ or ‘normal.’ The categorization was extrapolated to US TKA population and savings/expenses quantified. Statistical analyses were performed in Minitab with statistical significance set to α<0.05. Results. Current post-TKA approach is as much PT as possible (AMPTAP). AMPTAP was confirmed statistically. Because poor recovery costs are significant, balancing T1/T2 error minimizes risk by removing T1 error risk (α=0.00) via 27 PT sessions for equal cost to one manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). Previously captured, well-healed subject gait ROM were always normally distributed. Assessing performance via control charts showed serial ‘accelerated’/‘delayed’ recovery and would serially under/over-prescribe PT. Establishing recovery performance via ±1SD thresholds successfully evaluated 3 clinically established “poor recoverers” as ‘delayed’ and the reaming clinically established “good recoverers” as ‘normal’ or ‘accelerated’ throughout recovery. Discussion. Optimization for current AMPTAP approach, while effective reducing poor recovery risk, is a gross misuse of rehabilitation spending. Improved methods are necessary including those rooted with strong statistical foundation. Control charts are likely too fine an assessment as patient performance day-to-day is too variable resulting in clinical rehabilitation prescription over-reactions. In contrast, standard deviation thresholds likely provide a conservative approach that allows clinicians the opportunity to improve postoperative rehabilitation week-after-week throughout recovery. However, PT was not altered herein. Thus, the impact altering PT has on postoperative outcomes remains unknown. Future work should investigate how altering postoperative rehabilitation changes postoperative outcomes. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Despite the vast quantities of published artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms that target trauma and orthopaedic applications, very few progress to inform clinical practice. One key reason for this is the lack of a clear pathway from development to deployment. In order to assist with this process, we have developed the Clinical Practice Integration of Artificial Intelligence (CPI-AI) framework – a five-stage approach to the clinical practice adoption of AI in the setting of trauma and orthopaedics, based on the IDEAL principles (https://www.ideal-collaboration.net/). Adherence to the framework would provide a robust evidence-based mechanism for developing trust in AI applications, where the underlying algorithms are unlikely to be fully understood by clinical teams.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(9):507–512.

Patients offered fluid two-hours preoperatively have improved satisfaction, fewer complications and no increased intra-operative risk. Our hospital has prolonged pre-operative starvation times for trauma patients. Failure-Modes-and-Effects-Analysis (FMEA) was used to identify points of inefficiency in the preoperative starvation system. Data was collected from patients, ward-staff and computer-systems, on pre-operative starvation times and food provision following cancellation. A process map of the system was created. Failure-modes-and-effects were identified at interview and stakeholders were asked to risk-evaluate each failure-mode by providing consequence scores, probability of failure and of detection. Over 7-days, 27 patients were reviewed. Average fasting times were 6.84 (2–22.25) hours for fluid, and 12.03 (3–28.75) hours for food. Five patients were cancelled with a mean NMB time of 17.25 (3–28.75) hours. The highest risk scores identified were regarding the decision to place a patient on the list (10), keeping patients NBM (10.16) and being cancelled and fed (10.11). Process-mapping and FMEA can be applied to the pre-operative starvation of trauma patients to identify parts of the system that will have the biggest impact if improved. Engaging the multidisciplinary-team allowed all members to feel involved in risk assessment and quality improvement. Using FMEA should facilitate change and improve the system of pre-operative starvation

Background. Surgical quality improvement has received increasing attention in recent years, yet it isn't clear where orthopaedic surgeons should focus their efforts for the greatest impact on peri-operative safety and quality. We sought to guide these efforts by prioritising orthopaedic procedures according to their relative contribution to overall morbidity, mortality, and excess length of stay. Methods. We used data from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to identify all patients undergoing an orthopaedic procedure between 2005 and 2007 (n=7,970). Patients were assigned to 44 unique procedure groups based on Current Procedural and Terminology codes. We first assessed the relative contribution of each procedure group to overall morbidity and mortality in the first 30 days, and followed with a description of their relative contribution to excess length of stay. Results. Ten procedures accounted for 70% of adverse events and 64% of excess hospital days. Hip fracture repair accounted for the greatest share of adverse events, followed by total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, revision total hip arthroplasty, knee arthroscopy, laminectomy, lumbar/thoracic arthrodesis, and femur fracture repair. In contrast, no other procedure group accounted for more than 2% of morbidity and mortality. Conclusion. Only a few procedures account for the vast majority of morbidity and mortality in orthopaedic surgery. Concentrating quality improvement efforts on these procedures may be an effective way for surgeons and other stakeholders to improve peri-operative care and reduce cost in orthopaedic surgery

The response to the COVID-19 pandemic has raised the profile and level of interest in the use, acceptability, safety, and effectiveness of virtual outpatient consultations and telemedicine. These models of care are not new but a number of challenges have so far hindered widespread take-up and endorsement of these ways of working. With the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, remote and virtual working and consultation have become the default. This paper explores our experience of and learning from virtual and remote consultation and questions how this experience can be retained and developed for the future.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):301–304.

Aims

Orthopaedic surgeries are complex, frequently performed procedures associated with significant haemorrhage and perioperative blood transfusion. Given refinements in surgical techniques and changes to transfusion practices, we aim to describe contemporary transfusion practices in orthopaedic surgery in order to inform perioperative planning and blood banking requirements.

The imminent introduction of the new Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) curriculum, and the implementation of the Improving Surgical Training initiative, reflect yet another paradigm shift in the recent history of trauma and orthopaedic training. The move to outcome-based training without time constraints is a radical departure from the traditional time-based structure and represents an exciting new training frontier. This paper summarizes the history of T&O training reform, explains the rationale for change, and reflects on lessons learnt from the past.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2-3:181–190.

Introduction

Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are being increasingly used to offer safe and efficient orthopaedic review without the requirement for face-to-face contact. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to develop an online referral pathway that would allow us to provide definitive orthopaedic management plans and reduce face-to-face contact at the fracture clinics.

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the provision of orthopaedic care across the UK. During the pandemic orthopaedic specialist registrars were redeployed to “frontline” specialties occupying non-surgical roles. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic training in the UK is unknown. This paper sought to examine the role of orthopaedic trainees during the COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate orthopaedic education.

We evaluated the quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery by examining how they adhere to validated methodological standards in their development. A structured review was performed for guidelines that were published between January 2005 and April 2013 in medical journals or on the Internet. A pre-defined computerised search was used in MEDLINE, Scopus and Google to identify the guidelines. The AGREE II assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines in the study.

Seven international and national guidelines were identified. The overall methodological quality of the individual guidelines was good. ‘Scope and Purpose’ (median score 98% interquartile range (IQR)) 86% to 98%) and ‘Clarity of Presentation’ (median score 90%, IQR 90% to 95%) were the two domains that received the highest scores. ‘Applicability’ (median score 68%, IQR 45% to 75%) and ‘Editorial Independence’ (median score 71%, IQR 68% to 75%) had the lowest scores.

These findings reveal that although the overall methodological quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery is good, domains within their development, such as ‘Applicability’ and ‘Editorial Independence’, need to be improved. Application of the AGREE II instrument by the authors of guidelines may improve the quality of future guidelines and provide increased focus on aspects of methodology used in their development that are not robust.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:19–23.