Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications after joint replacement. It is associated with high morbidity and economic burden when misdiagnosed as an aseptic failure. Among all cases of PJI, up to 25% could yield negative cultures. Conversely, among cases of aseptic failures, up to 30% may actually be undiagnosed PJIs. In PJIs microbiological diagnosis is a key step for successful treatment. Sonication of the removed prosthesis is more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic-tissue culture, especially in patients who received antimicrobial therapy before surgery. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of classic sonication fluid cultures (SF-C) and sonication fluid incubation in blood culture bottle (SF-BCB). Method. Between 2016 and 2018 we analysed 160 revision procedures of joint arthroplasties. For each procedure, at least 5 microbiological and multiple histopathological samples were harvested, and explant sonication was performed which was further analysed by SF-C and SF-BCB. For SF-C classical cultivation of sonication fluid was performed. While for SF-BCB, 10 mL of sonication fluid was inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic lytic blood culture bottles. The definite diagnosis of PJI was based on the EBJIS definition. Results. Among 160 revisions, 59 PJIs were identified, 15 patients were treated with the debridement and implant retention, 7 patients with the one-stage and 35 with the two-stage exchange, remaining 2 were partial revisions. The sensitivity of SF-C and SF-BCB were 81.5% and 94.9%, respectively. The mismatch of microbe identification was observed in 5 cases. We observed positive SF-C while negative SF-BCB in 4 cases, among them having 2 positive histology. While 12 patients have negative SF-C and positive SF-BCB, among them 3 have positive and 6 negative histology. Among these 12 patients, typical low-grade microbes were identified in 9 cases (5 cases of C. acnes, 3 cases of S. epidermidis, and 1 case of S. capitis). Conclusions. The weakest point in all PJI diagnostic criteria is their sensitivity. SF-BCB demonstrates higher sensitivity in diagnosing PJI compared to SF-C. Therefore, it appears prudent to incorporate SF-BCB into the diagnostic protocol for all patients exhibiting either low-grade PJI symptoms or experiencing undiagnosed, presumably aseptic failures, where the likelihood of misdiagnosing infection is greatest

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after joint arthroplasty. Diagnosing PJI can be challenging as preoperative screening and conventional cultures may be inconclusive. Sonication fluid culturing stands out as a valuable adjunct technique to improve microbiological PJI diagnosis. This study aims to determine the clinical relevance of routinely using sonication for all septic and aseptic revisions. Method. All patients who underwent (partial) hip or knee revision arthroplasty for all causes between 2012 and 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the European Bone and Joint Society PJI criteria, we categorized them into three groups: infection confirmed, infection likely, and infection unlikely. We analyzed the clinical, laboratory, and radiological screening that could confirm or refute suspicion of PJI. We analyzed microbiology cultures and the most frequently detected microorganisms. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for synovial fluid cultures (preoperative), tissue cultures, and sonication fluid cultures. We determined the clinical relevance of sonication as the percentage of patients for whom sonication confirmed (microbiological) PJI diagnosis. Results. 429 patients who underwent (partial) revision of hip (246 patients) or knee (183 patients) arthroplasty were included. Sensitivity and specificity were 69% and 99% for preoperative synovial fluid cultures, 76% and 92% for intraoperative tissue cultures, and 80% and 89% for sonication fluid cultures, respectively. Sonication fluid cultures improved tissue culture sensitivity and specificity to 83% and 99%, respectively. In 12 (11%) out of 110 PJIs, sonication fluid cultures were decisive for confirming the causative pathogen. This was applicable to acute and chronic infections. In 29 (9%) out of 319 aseptic cases, a negative sonication fluid culture could confirm contamination of tissue cultures. Conclusions. Routine sonication fluid cultures enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of PJI diagnostics. In 11% of PJI cases, causative pathogens were confirmed by sonication fluid culture results. Routine sonication may be helpful in confirming contamination of synovial fluid cultures and tissue cultures. Routine sonication fluid culture should be performed in all revision arthroplasties

Aim. One of the surgical therapeutic options for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) includes debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). Prognostically favorable criteria for DAIR include short duration of symptoms, stable implant, pathogen susceptible to a ‘biofilm-active’ antimicrobial agent, and intact soft-tissue conditions. Despite this, there is a proportion of failures after DAIR, possibly because the duration of infection is underestimated. With the hypothesis that the duration of infection correlates with the bacterial load, and hence, the bacterial load is associated with failure after DAIR, we aimed to investigate the association of bacterial load in the sonication fluid of mobile parts and clinical outcome after DAIR. Method. From our PJI cohort (2010–2021), patients with DAIR (both palliative and curative approaches) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with hip, knee or shoulder arthroplasties fulfilling infection definition, available sonication results, and ≥2 years follow-up were included. Sonication results were categorized in ≤ or >1000 cfu/mL. Univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for DAIR failure. Results. Out of 209 PJIs, we identified 96 patients (100 PJIs, 47.8%) with DAIR. In 67 (69.8%) patients with 71 PJIs, there was a follow-up of ≥2 years. The mean age was 72.7 (SD 12.99) years, 50% were male. The infection affected 36 hips (50.7%), 32 knees (45.1%) and 3 shoulders (4.2%). At follow-up, there were 29 (40.8%) cured and 42 (59.2%) failed cases. When comparing failed and cured cases, we found no difference in comorbidities and previously defined risk factors for PJI, ASA score, Charlson score, anatomic location, no. of previous surgeries, pathogenesis of infection or laboratory values. The proportion of patients with high bacterial load on mobile parts (i.e. >1000 cfu/mL) was significantly higher in the failed DAIR group than it was in the cured group (61.9% vs 20.7%, p<0.001). Conclusions. In this study, a high bacterial load in sonication fluid of mobile parts was associated with failure after DAIR in patients with PJI. Sonication may help to differentiate acute hematogenous seeding to the implant and late reactivation of a previously silent implant-associated infection

Aim. To compare the performance of sonication and chemical methods (EDTA and DTT) for biofilm removal from artificial surface. Method. In vitro a mature biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984) and P. aeruginosa ATCC®53278) were grown on porous glass beads for 3 days in inoculated brain heart infusion broth (BHI). After biofilm formation, beads were exposed to 0.9% NaCl (control), sonication (40 kHz, 1 min, 0.2 W/cm. 2. ), EDTA (25 mM/15 min) and DTT (1 g/L/15 min). Quantitative and qualitative biofilm analysis were performed with viable counts (CFU/ml) and microcalorimetry using time to detection (TTD), defined as the time from insertion of the ampoule into the calorimeter until the exponentially rising of heat flow signal exceeded 100 μW, which is inversely proportional to the amount of remaining bacterial biofilm on the beads. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Results. Mean colony counts obtained after treatment S. epidermidis biofilms with EDTA and DTT was similar to those after 0.9% NaCl (control) – 6.3, 6.1 and 6.0 log CFU/mL, respectively. Sonication detected significantly higher CFU counts with 7.5 log (p<0.05). Concordant results were detected with microcalorimetry: significantly less (p<0.05) biofilm after treatment with sonication compared to EDTA and DTT (12 h vs 6h and 6h, respectively). The same results were observed when P. aeruginosa biofilms were treated. Mean colony counts dislodged after treatment with EDTA and DTT was similar to those after 0.9% NaCl (control) – 5.2, 5.3 and 5.0 log CFU/mL, respectively. Sonication detected significantly higher CFU counts with 6.5 log (p<0.05). Microcalorimetry reviled concordant results: significantly less (p<0.05) biofilm after treatment with sonication in comparison with EDTA and DTT (11 h vs 6h and 6h, respectively). Conclusions. Chemical methods showed no difference in biofilm dislodging compared to normal saline. Sonication is superior to chemical methods (DTT or EDTA) for biofilm detection. Sonication may be improved by combination of two or more chemical dislodgement methods

Aim. The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were pre-operatively evaluated as aseptic failure. Method. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for presumed aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologicaly evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced. Results. Between October 2010 and June 2016 265 cases were operated as aseptic loosenings (66 revision knee arthroplasty, 199 revision hip arthroplasty). 69 (26,0%) cases had positive sonication and negative periprosthetic tissue sample, 24 (9,1%) cases had positive tissue samples, but negative sonication, in 27 (10,2%) cases both tests were positive and in 145 (54,7%) cases all microbiologic tests were negative. In both groups coagulase-negative staphylococci and P.acnes were most common, followed by mixed flora. Conclusions. With the increasing number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty, a clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection is crucial for the optimal treatment. Sonication of explanted material is more successful in the isolation of pathogens compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures. Sonication of explanted prosthetic material is helpful in the detection of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a rare, but devastating complication. Diagnostic approaches to PJI vary greatly between different centers. Most commonly tissue biopsies and synovial fluid sampling are recommended for identification pathogens causing PJI. However, sensitivity and specificity of those techniques have been shown to be highly dependent on preanalytical factors like time and conditions of transportation, location of sampling, as well as analytical approaches and prolonged incubation for up to 14days. Sonication of explanted orthopedic devices has been shown to be more than only an addition in the diagnosis of PJI. The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of sonication in PJI. Method. Retrospective cohort analysis of orthopedic samples sent for sonication from 29 surgical centers between 06/2014–04/2017. Until 07/2015 samples were plated on Columbia-, MacConkey-, Chocolate- and Schaedler agar*, incubated aerobically and anaerobically for up to 14 days. In 07/2015 an additional enrichment of 10ml per aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles* was introduced. The bottles were also incubated up to 14days and plated immediately if growth was detected. Results. We evaluated 698 orthopedic samples sent for sonication, of which resulted in growth of one (n=355) or several (n=15) relevant pathogens. Coagulase negative staphylococci were isolated in 162 cases; Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 67 cases, Propionibacterium spp. In 23 cases, Streptococcus spp. in 14 cases, Gram negative in 44 cases, Enterococcus spp. also in 14 cases and Candida spp. in 3 cases. The necessary time of incubation to growth was further decreased to 1.8 days (range: 0–13) days after introduction of additional incubation of sonicate fluid in blood-culture bottles. 92.7% of all positive samples showed growth before the 8th day of incubation. Conclusions. Sonication of explanted orthopedic devices and culturing of the sonicate fluid provides a fast reliable tool for diagnosing pathogens of PJI/ODAI potentially without the need for prolonged incubation for up to 14 days. The additional incubation of the sonicate fluid in automated blood-culturing systems further improves the limit of detection and the time to growth. *BioMerieux, Marcy étoile

Clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection remains one of the goals of modern orthopaedic surgery. The development of new diagnostic methods enabled more precise evaluation of the etiology of prosthetic joint failure. With the introduction of sonication an increasing number of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection were detected. The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were preoperatively evaluated as aseptic failure. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologicaly evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced. Between October 2010 and April 2013 54 patients were operated (12 revision knee arthroplasty, 42 revision hip arthroplasty). 10 (18,6%) patients had positive sonication and negative periprosthetic tissue sample, 5 (9,2%) patients had positive tissue samples, but negative sonication, in 9 (16,7%) patients both tests were positive and in 30 (55,5%) patients all microbiologic tests were negative. The microbiologic isolates of sonicate fluid were in 12 cases coagulase-negative staphylococci, in 3 cases P.acnes in 3 cases mixed flora, in 1 case enterococcus and in 1 case SA. From periprosthetic tissue cultures 5 samples have yielded coagulase-negative staphylococci in 5 cases P.acnes in 2 cases mixed flora, in 1 case enterococcus and in 1 case SA were isolated. With the increasing number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty, a clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection is crucial for the optimal treatment. Sonication of explanted material is more successful in the isolation of pathogens compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures. Sonication of explanted prosthetic material is helpful in the detection of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections

Aim. Clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection remains one of the goals of modern orthopaedic surgery. New diagnostic methods can provide more precise evaluation of the etiology of prosthetic joint failure. With the introduction of sonication an increasing number of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection were detected. The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were preoperatively evaluated as aseptic failure. Method. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for presumed aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologically evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced. Results. Between October 2010 and till the end of 2014 151 cases were operated (38 revision knee arthroplasty, 113 revision hip arthroplasty). 40 (26,5%) cases had positive sonication and negative periprosthetic tissue samples (knee 7 cases, hips 33 cases), 13 (8,6%) cases had positive tissue samples but negative sonication (knee 7 cases, hips 6 cases), in 13 (8,6%) cases both tests were positive (knee none, hips 13 cases) and in 85 (56,3%) cases all microbiologic tests were negative (knee 24 cases, hips 61 cases). In both groups cases coagulase-negative staphylococci and P.acnes were most common, followed by mixed flora. Conclusions. With the increasing number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty, a clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection is crucial for the optimal treatment. Sonication of explanted material is more successful in the isolation of pathogens compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures. Sonication of explanted prosthetic material is helpful in the detection of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) has been frequently indicated to treat long bone open and closed fractures, but infection following internal fixation may have devastating consequences, with higher costs. Treatment of intramedullary nail-associated infections (IMNI) is challenging and based upon surgery and adequate antibiotic administration, which requires the correct identification of causative microorganisms. However, there have been difficulties for the microbial diagnosis of IMNI, as the peri-prosthetic tissue cultures may show no microbial growth, particularly in patients with previous use of antibiotics. Sonication have shown higher sensitivity and specificity for microbial identification on a variety of orthopedic implant-associated infections. Aim: To compare clinical and microbiological results and sensitivity for the pathogen identification obtained by conventional peri-implant tissue culture samples with culture of samples obtained by sonication of explanted IMN implants, among patients presenting IMNI of long bones. Methods: Longitudinal prospective cohort study performed at a tertiary public hospital, ongoing since August 2011. We analyzed all patients with indication for IMN implant removal, and orthopedic-implant associated infections was defined according to previous publications addressing osteosynthesis-associated infections (Yano 2014). Minimal of 2 samples from the peri-implant tissue were taken and sent under sterile conditions to the laboratory for culture. Statistical analysis was performed McNemar's test for related proportions. Results: We included 26 patients presenting clinical signs of IMNI, of which tissue and sonication cultures were performed for 26 (100%) and 20 (77%) patients, respectively. Among them, 88% were male, with mean age was 35.9 years (range, 19–59 yo). Causes of trauma were mainly motorcycle crashes accounting 54% of accidents; tibia and fibula were affected in 65% and 27%, respectively. Gustilo open fracture classification was grade II (35%) and IIIA (35%). First stage management with external fixation for fracture stabilization was performed in 75% of trauma patients. Sensitivity of peri-prosthetic tissue culture and sonication was 80.7% (21/26), and 95% (19/20) (p< 0.05), respectively. Only one infected patient presented negative tissue and fluid cultures. Gram-positive cocci were isolated in 75% and 79% in tissue and sonication fluid cultures, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus sp., were isolated from tissue and sonication culture in 43.5% and 36.3%, 8.7% and 22.7%, 13% and 13.7%, respectively. Polymicrobial infection was diagnosed in 3.8% (1/26) and 15.8% (3/19), patients by tissue and sonication fluid cultures (p< 0,01), respectively. Conclusion: Sonication of retrieved infected intramedullary nails has the potential for improving the microbiological diagnosis of IMNI

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the sonication fluid cultures (SFC) for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection and compare it with frozen section and periprosthetic tissue cultures. 108 patients underwent revision or explantation procedure for any reason. Frozen sections of intraoperative specimen were analized and multiple periprosthetic samples (at least 5) were collected and cultured. All explanted prosthesis components were subject to sonication and cultured. All cultures were incubated for 14 days. PJI was diagnosed in 52 patients (48%). Sonication achieved the highest sensivity with 95% and specificity of 98%. Frozen section showed low sensivity (44%) and specificity (80%) and periprosthetic tissue cultures showed sensivity of 75% and specificity of 98%. Sonication fluid culture is a cheap, easy, accurate and sensitive diagnostic method and helps to detect about 30% more PJI compared to frozen section and 16% more compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures. It also detect about 25% more pathogens than periprosthetic tissue cultures

Collection of 4–5 independent peri-prosthetic tissue samples is recommended for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections. Sonication of explanted prostheses has also been shown to increase microbiological yield in some centres. We compared sonication with standard tissue sampling for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and other orthopaedic device related infections. We used standard protocols for sample collection, tissue culture and sonication. Positive tissue culture was defined as isolation of a phenotypically indistinguishable organism from ≥2 samples; and positive sonication culture as isolation of an organism at ≥50 cfu/ml. We compared the diagnostic performance of each method against an established clinical definition of infection (Trampuz 2011), and against a composite clinical and microbiological definition of infection based on international consensus (Gehrke & Parvizi 2013). 350 specimens were received for sonication, including joint prostheses (160), exchangeable components (76), other orthopaedic hardware and cement (104), and bone (10). A median of 5 peri-prosthetic tissue samples were received from each procedure (IQR 4–5). Tissue culture was more sensitive than sonication for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and orthopaedic device related infection using both the clinical definition (66% versus 57%, McNemar's Χ2 test p=0.016) and the composite definition of infection (87% vs 66%, p<0.001). The combination of tissue culture and sonication provided optimum sensitivity: 73% (95% confidence interval 65–79%) against the clinical definition and 92% (86–96%) against the composite definition. Results were similar when analysis was confined to joint prostheses and exchangeable components; other orthopaedic hardware; and patients who had received antibiotics within 14 days prior to surgery. Tissue sampling appears to have higher sensitivity than sonication for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and orthopaedic device infection at our centre. This may reflect rigorous collection of multiple peri-prosthetic tissue samples. A combination of methods may offer optimal sensitivity, reflecting the anatomical and biological spectrum of prosthetic joint and other device related infections

To retrospectively analyze the etiology and microbiological results of synovial fluid culture, periprosthetic tissue culture and sonication fluid culture in 74 episodes of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in 66 patients treated at the Department for Orthopaedic Surgery in 5 years period. PJI was diagnosed according to the standard definition criteria (1). Conventional microbiological methods were used together with sonication of explanted prosthesis and sonication fluid culture. The results are presented in Table 1. Acute PJI were more common in female patients (72%), whereas delayed PJI occurred in both sexes equally. Surprisingly, among acute PJI streptococcal (especially Streptococcus agalactiae) PJI were as common as Staphylococcus aureus PJI; we also observed high percentage of polymicrobial PJI (26 % among acute PJI and 30 % among delayed PJI), whereas 6/21 (28.6%) were detected by sonication fluid culture only. Preoperative synovial fluid culture identified the pathogen in 91.3% of acute PJI and in 63.2% of delayed PJI. Sonication fluid culture identified causative pathogens in 85% of acute PJI and in 95% of delayed PJI. In acute PJI 24/34 (70.6%) patient had concordant microbiological results between standard cultures and sonication fluid cultures, whereas in 4/34 (11.7%) microorganisms were detected by sonication fluid culture only and in 6/34 (17.6%)by tissue culture only. 23/40 (57.5%)patients with delayed PJI had concordant microbiological results; in 3/40 (7.5%) pathogens were detected by sonication fluid culture only. We found sonication as very useful additional method in diagnostics of PJI, especially low grade PJI. At the same time we observed high percentage of positive and concordant mcrobiological results between all three microbiological methods in patients with acute PJI

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of an isolated positive sonication fluid culture (SFC) in patients who underwent revision surgery of a prosthetic joint. We hypothesized that cases with a positive SFC have a higher rate of infection and prosthesis failure during follow-up compared to controls with a negative SFC.

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intraoperative direct sonication on the yield of traditional culture and the time to positivity (TTP) of cultures obtained for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), thereby assessing its potential to improve diagnostic efficiency and reduce contamination risk.

Aim

Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection are often complicated by the presence of biofilm, which hampers bacteria dislodging from the implants, thus affecting sensitivity of cultures. In the last 20 years several studies have evidenced the usefulness of implant sonication to improve microbial recovery from biofilm formed on inert substrates. More recently, treatment of prosthetic joints and tissues with Dithiothreitol, a sulphur compound already used in routine diagnostic workflow for fluidification of respiratory samples, has proved to be not inferior to sonication in microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections.

This study aimed to evaluate if the combination of the two treatments could further improve microbial retrieval from biofilm in an in vitro model.

Aim

S. aureus and S. epidermidis remain the leading biofilm-forming agents causing orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI), but other coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) with clinical importance is emerging. Besides, few studies have assessed specific genomic traits associated with patient outcome. This is a preliminary descriptive study of phenotypic and genomic features identified in clinical isolates of S. aureus and CoNS isolates recovered from OIAIs patients that progressed to treatment failure.

Aim

In cases of prosthetic joint infections the sensitivity of bacterial cultivation of tissue samples is not 100%. In fact, the reported sensitivity based on standardized criteria and rigorous tissue sampling technique probably differs between 86 to 89%. It has been claimed that sonication of explanted prostheses with subsequent culturing of sonication fluid can increase the sensitivity of the test compared to culturing of tissue samples. To what degree bacteria embedded in biofilm is dislodged during the sonication process has to our knowledge not been fully elucidated. We studied the effect of sonication as a method to dislodge biofilm embedded Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro.

Introduction:

The diagnosis of implant-associated infections is challenging, and the conventional culturing of periprosthetic tissue has been the gold standard for diagnosis of implant-associated infections. However, conventional diagnostic tests are inaccurate because the pathogenesis of implant-associated infection is related to microorganisms growing in biofilms. We compared culture of samples obtained by sonication of explanted implants to dislodge adherent bacteria from implants with conventional culture of periprosthetic tissue. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of sonication that is microbiological diagnostic method for implant-associated infections.

Aim

Metagenomic nanopore sequencing is demonstrating potential as a tool for diagnosis of infections directly from clinical samples. We have previously shown nanopore sequencing can be used to determine the causative bacterial species in prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, to make predictions regarding antimicrobial resistance, human DNA contamination must be reduced so a greater proportion of sequence data corresponds to the microbial portion of the DNA extract. Here, we utilise selective DNA extraction from sonication fluid samples to begin to make predictions regarding antimicrobial resistance in PJI.

Introduction: In recent years the implementation of sonication in the diagnosis of orthopaedic implant infections has improved the detection of subclinical infections. With the use of sonication of removed orthopaedic material we can detect the presence of biofilm. The method has already shown encouraging results, especially in cases of preoperative antibiotic therapy.

Aim: The aim of the study was to detect infections of orthopaedic material using both sonication and standard diagnostic methods, and to compare the obtained results of both methods.

For the purpose of the study we sonicated all explanted material at revision surgery and cultured the obtained samples. During revision surgery soft tissue biopsies were collected and analyzed using standard microbiologic methods. The results were compared, analyzed and additional therapy was applied, if an infection of the material was proven.

During the period from September 2009 to the end of March 2014 we studied 249 cases (198 patients) of revision surgery (166 cases of revision hip arthroplasty, 53 cases of revision knee arthroplasty, 13 cases of revision foot surgery, 17 cases of revision spine surgery). Of studied cases infection was proven in 20 (8,0%) cases by soft tissue biopsies only, 90 cases (36,1%) were diagnosed both by soft tissue biopsies and sonication, 45 cases (18,1%) were diagnosed only by sonication of explanted prosthetic material and in 94 cases (37,8%) all results were negative. The statistical analysis has shown statistically significant (p<0,05) improvement of infection detection using sonication.

According to our experience the implementation of sonication has shown an improvement in the diagnosis of orthopaedic implant infections. Despite certain limitations, sonication should be considered in doubtful cases of revision surgery. The use of sonication should be emphasized in cases of preoperative antibiotic treatment.