Abstract
Aim
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications after joint replacement. It is associated with high morbidity and economic burden when misdiagnosed as an aseptic failure. Among all cases of PJI, up to 25% could yield negative cultures. Conversely, among cases of aseptic failures, up to 30% may actually be undiagnosed PJIs. In PJIs microbiological diagnosis is a key step for successful treatment. Sonication of the removed prosthesis is more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic-tissue culture, especially in patients who received antimicrobial therapy before surgery. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of classic sonication fluid cultures (SF-C) and sonication fluid incubation in blood culture bottle (SF-BCB).
Method
Between 2016 and 2018 we analysed 160 revision procedures of joint arthroplasties. For each procedure, at least 5 microbiological and multiple histopathological samples were harvested, and explant sonication was performed which was further analysed by SF-C and SF-BCB. For SF-C classical cultivation of sonication fluid was performed. While for SF-BCB, 10 mL of sonication fluid was inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic lytic blood culture bottles. The definite diagnosis of PJI was based on the EBJIS definition.
Results
Among 160 revisions, 59 PJIs were identified, 15 patients were treated with the debridement and implant retention, 7 patients with the one-stage and 35 with the two-stage exchange, remaining 2 were partial revisions. The sensitivity of SF-C and SF-BCB were 81.5% and 94.9%, respectively. The mismatch of microbe identification was observed in 5 cases. We observed positive SF-C while negative SF-BCB in 4 cases, among them having 2 positive histology. While 12 patients have negative SF-C and positive SF-BCB, among them 3 have positive and 6 negative histology. Among these 12 patients, typical low-grade microbes were identified in 9 cases (5 cases of C. acnes, 3 cases of S. epidermidis, and 1 case of S. capitis).
Conclusions
The weakest point in all PJI diagnostic criteria is their sensitivity. SF-BCB demonstrates higher sensitivity in diagnosing PJI compared to SF-C. Therefore, it appears prudent to incorporate SF-BCB into the diagnostic protocol for all patients exhibiting either low-grade PJI symptoms or experiencing undiagnosed, presumably aseptic failures, where the likelihood of misdiagnosing infection is greatest.
