There is limited literature on the effects of socioeconomic factors on outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). In the setting of hip or knee arthroplasty, patients of a lower socioeconomic status demonstrate poorer post-operative satisfaction, longer lengths of stay, and larger functional limitations. It is important to ascertain whether this phenomenon is present in ankle arthritis patients. This is the first study to address the weight of potential socioeconomic factors in affecting various socioeconomic classes, in terms of how they benefit from ankle arthroplasty. This is retrospective cohort study of 447 patients who underwent a TAA. Primary outcomes included pre-operative and final follow-up AAOS pain, AAOS disability, and SF-36 scores. We then used postal codes to determine median household income using Canadian 2015 census data. Incomes were divided into five groups based on equal amounts over the range of incomes. This method has been used to study medical conditions such as COPD and cardiac disease. These income groups were then compared for differences in outcome measures. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired t-test. A total of 447 patients were divided into quintiles by income. From lowest income to highest income, the groups had 54, 207, 86, 64, and 36 patients, respectively. The average time from surgery to final follow up was 85.6 months. Interestingly, we found that patients within the middle household income groups had significantly lower AAOS disability scores compared to the lowest income groups at final follow-up (26.41 vs 35.70, p=0.035). Furthermore, there was a trend towards middle income households and lower post-operative AAOS pain scores compared to the lowest income group (19.57 vs 26.65, p=0.063). There was also a trend toward poorer AAOS disability scores when comparing middle income groups to high income groups post-operatively (26.41 vs 32.27, p=0.058). Pre-operatively, patients within the middle-income group had more pain, compared to the lowest and the highest income groups. No significant differences in SF-36 scores were observed. There were no significant differences seen in middle income groups compared to the highest income group for AAOS pain post-operatively. There were no significant differences found in pre-operative AAOS disability score between income groups. Patients from middle income groups who have undergone TAA demonstrate poorer function and possibly more pain, compared to lower and higher income groups. This suggests that TAA is a viable option for lower socioeconomic groups and should not be a source of discouragement for surgeons. In this circumstance there is no real disparity between the rich and the poor. Further investigation is needed to explore reasons for diminished performance in middle class patients

Higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation have been associated with worse health outcomes. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has not previously been investigated. A total of 217 patients (171 female, 46 male; median age 23.4 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to their New Zealand Deprivation (NZDep) Index: minimal deprivation (NZDep Index 1–3, n=89), moderate deprivation (NZDep Index 4–6, n=94), and maximal deprivation (NZDep Index 7–10, n=34). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables, surgical details, complications, and pre-operative and two-year post-operative functional scores (including International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), EQ-5D quality of life score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for the effect of NZDep Index on patient outcomes. Patients in the maximal deprivation group were more likely to be Māori (p<0.001) and have surgery in a public rather than a private hospital (p=0.004), while the minimal deprivation group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.005). There were otherwise no other significant differences in baseline variables, surgical details, complications, nor pre-operative or two-year post-operative functional scores between the three groups (all p>0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a higher NZDep Index to be independently predictive of a lower pre-operative UCLA activity score (p=0.014) and a higher two-year iHOT-12 score (p<0.001). Our results demonstrate an inequality in access to PAO, with patients exposed to higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation under-represented in our study population. When provided access to PAO, these vulnerable patients achieve significant functional improvement at least as great as patients with less socioeconomic deprivation. Initiatives to improve access to hip preservation care in socioeconomically deprived populations appear warranted

There is little known about how patient socioeconomic status impacts clinical outcomes in hip preservation surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between indices of multiple deprivation, funding provider (NHS Funded or Private Funded) and clinical outcomes following surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The study analysed the data of 5590 patients recorded in the NAHR who underwent primary hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI between November 2013 and July 2023. Records were matched to the UK National index of multiple deprivation using the lower layer super output area. Using iHOT12 score, patient reported outcome measures were analysed at base line and 1 year following surgery. 2358 records were matched to LLSOA deciles. Between the lowest (most deprived) 3 deciles and the highest (least deprived) the average baseline iHOT12 score was 28.98 (n=366) and 35.33 (n=821). The proportion of patients receiving treatment through NHS funding compared to independent funding for the most deprived, 292 (90%) 37 (10%) respectively compared to the least deprived 515 (70%) and 244 (30%) respectively. At 1year, iHOT12 scores for each group were 51.64 (29.1 SD) compared to 61.5 (28.06 SD) respectively. The study demonstrates that patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had poorer baseline and one-year post-surgery iHOT12 scores compared to those from higher socioeconomic strata. Furthermore, a higher reliance on NHS funding was observed among the most deprived, while more affluent patients predominantly opted for private funding. These findings underscore the significant influence of socioeconomic status on both the quality of healthcare received and recovery outcomes in hip preservation surgery, calling attention to the need for more equitable healthcare solutions

Aims. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgical procedures. The objectives of this study were to define whether there is a correlation between socioeconomic status (SES) and surgical complications after elective primary unilateral THA, and investigate whether access to elective THA differs within SES groups. Methods. We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study involving 202 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, over a 17-year period. Patients were divided into income quintiles based on postal codes as a proxy for personal economic status. Multivariable logistic regression models were then used to primarily assess the relationship between SES and surgical complications within one year of index THA. Results. Of 111,359 patients who underwent elective primary THA, those in the lower SES groups had statistically significantly more comorbidities and statistically significantly more postoperative complications. While there was no increase in readmission rates within 90 days, there was a statistically significant difference in the primary and secondary outcomes including all revisions due (with a subset of deep wound infection and dislocation). Results showed that those in the higher SES groups had proportionally more cases performed than those in lower groups. Compared to the highest SES quintile, the lower groups had 61% of the number of hip arthroplasties performed. Conclusion. Patients in lower socioeconomic groups have more comorbidities, fewer absolute number of cases performed, have their procedures performed in lower-volume centres, and ultimately have higher rates of complications. This lack of access and higher rates of complications is a “double hit” to those in lower SES groups, and indicates that we should be concentrating efforts to improve access to surgeons and hospitals where arthroplasty is routinely performed in high numbers. Even in a universal healthcare system where there are no penalties for complications such as readmission, there seems to be an inequality in the access to THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):589–597

Aims. The aim of this study was to examine whether socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher risk of infections following total hip arthroplasty (THA) at 30 and 90 days. Methods. We obtained individual-based information on SES markers (cohabitation, education, income, and savings) on 103,901 THA patients from Danish health registries between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2017. The primary outcome measure was any hospital-treated infection (i.e. all infections). The secondary outcomes were further specified to specific hospital-treated infections (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and periprosthetic joint infection). The primary timepoint was within 90 days. In addition, the outcomes were further evaluated within 30 days. We calculated the cumulative incidence, and used the pseudo-observation method and generalized linear regression to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each marker. Results. The cumulative incidence of any infection at 90 days was highest in patients who lived alone (1.5% (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6)) versus cohabitant (0.7% (95% CI 0.7 to 0.8)), had the lowest educational achievement (1.1% (95% CI 1.0 to 1.2)) versus highest (0.7% (95% CI 0.5 to 0.8)), had the lowest income (1.6% (95% CI 1.5 to 1.70)) versus highest (0.4% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.5)), or had lowest savings (1.3% (95% CI 1.2 to 1.4)) versus highest (0.7% (95% CI 0.6 to 0.8)). Within 90 days, the RRs for any infection were 1.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.4) for patients living alone versus cohabiting, 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3) for low education achievement versus high, 1.7 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.1) for low income versus high income, and 1.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.8) for low savings versus high savings. The same trends were also seen for any infections within the first 30 days. Conclusion. Our study provides evidence that socioeconomic inequality adversely influences the risk of infection after THA, thus contributing to healthcare disparities and inequalities. We found that living alone, low educational achievement, low income, or low savings were associated with higher risks of infections within the first 30 and 90 days after THA. Therefore, the development of targeted intervention strategies with the aim of increasing awareness of patients identified as being at greatest risk is needed to mitigate the impact of SES on the risk of infections following THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):221–226

This prospective study assessed the effect of social deprivation on the Oxford hip score at one year after total hip replacement. An analysis of 1312 patients undergoing 1359 primary total hip replacements for symptomatic osteoarthritis was performed over a 35-month period. Social deprivation was assessed using the Carstairs index. Those patients who were most deprived underwent surgery at an earlier age (p = 0.04), had more comorbidities (p = 0.02), increased severity of symptoms at presentation (p = 0.001), and were not as satisfied with their outcome (p = 0.03) compared with more affluent patients. There was a significant improvement in Oxford scores at 12 months relative to pre-operative scores for all socioeconomic categories (p < 0.001). Social deprivation was a significant independent predictor of mean improvement in Oxford scores at 12 months, after adjusting for confounding variables (p = 0.001). Deprivation was also associated with an increased risk of dislocation (odds ratio 5.3, p < 0.001) and mortality at 90 days (odds ratio 3.2, p = 0.02). Outcome, risk of dislocation and early mortality after a total hip replacement are affected by the socioeconomic status of the patient

Traumatic rotator cuff injuries can be a leading cause of prolonged shoulder pain and disability, and contribute to significant morbidity and healthcare costs. Previous studies have shown evidence of socio-demographic disparities with these injuries. The purpose of this nationwide study was to better understand these disparities based on ethnicity, sex, and socio-economic status, in order to inform future healthcare strategies. Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) is a no-fault comprehensive compensation scheme encompassing all of Aotearoa/New Zealand (population in 2018, 4.7 million). Using the ACC database, traumatic rotator cuff injuries were identified between January 2010 and December 2018. Injuries were categorized by sex, ethnicity, age and socioeconomic deprivation index of the claimant. During the 9-year study period, there were 351,554 claims accepted for traumatic rotator cuff injury, which totalled over $960 million New Zealand Dollars. The greatest proportion of costs was spent on vocational support (49.8%), then surgery (26.3%), rehabilitation (13.1%), radiology (8.1%), general practitioner (1.6%) and “Other” (1.1%). Asian, Māori (Indigenous New Zealanders), and Pacific peoples were under-represented in the age-standardized proportion of total claims and had lower rates of surgery than Europeans. Māori had higher proportion of costs spent on vocational support and lower proportions spent on radiology, rehabilitation and surgery than Europeans. Males had higher number and costs of claims and were more likely to have surgery than females. There were considerably fewer claims from areas of high socio-economic deprivation. This large nation-wide study demonstrates the important and growing economic burden of rotator cuff injuries. Indirect costs, such as vocational supports, are a major contributor to the cost suggesting improving treatment and rehabilitation protocols would have the greatest economic impact. This study has also identified socio-demographic disparities which need to be addressed in order to achieve equity in health outcomes

This is the first study to use the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2007, the Government’s official measure of multiple deprivation, to analyse the effect of socioeconomic status on the incidence of fractures of the hip and their outcome and mortality. Our sample consisted of all patients admitted to hospital with a fracture of the hip (n = 7511) in Nottingham between 1999 and 2009. The incidence was 1.3 times higher (p = 0.038) in the most deprived populations than in the least deprived; the most deprived suffered a fracture, on average, 1.1 years earlier (82.0 years versus 83.1 years, p < 0.001). The mortality rate proved to be significantly higher in the most deprived population (log-rank test, p = 0.033), who also had a higher number of comorbidities (p = 0.001). This study has shown an increase in the incidence of fracture of the hip in the most deprived population, but no association between socioeconomic status and mortality at 30 days. Preventative programmes aimed at reducing the risk of hip fracture should be targeted towards the more deprived if they are to make a substantial impact

Introduction. It is thought that socioeconomic status and cultural upbringing influence the patient based outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. Previous studies have shown that patients in a lower socioeconomic class had surgery at an earlier age, increased comorbidities, increased severity of symptoms at presentation, and less satisfaction with the outcome. The purpose of this study was to compare the 1) reasons for undergoing total joint replacement and 2) satisfaction with the outcome among patients in different cultures and socioeconomic categories. We hypothesized that the overall reasons for undergoing surgery would be similar among all groups. Method. Patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty were divided into groups based on their country of residence and socioeconomic status. The patients were asked to rank their reasons for undergoing surgery preoperatively from 1 to 4 according to importance. They were also asked to state how much relief of pain or improvement in function they expected to obtain. They were then asked to complete a questionnaire assessing their satisfaction with surgery 6 months post-operatively. These results were then compared across the three groups. Results. Thirty Nepalese patients and 10 American patients who received total hip or knee arthroplasty as part of a charitable outreach program were compared with 20 age and sex matched American patients who electively underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty. In both the Nepalese and outreach American patients, pain relief followed by improvement in performing everyday actions were listed as the most important reasons for undergoing surgery. The control group of American patients who sought surgery electively listed pain relief followed by improvement in performing individual activities as the main reasons for undergoing surgery. As compared to the other groups, the elective patients ranked athletic improvement higher as a reason for undergoing surgery. A review of the post-operative questionnaires completed by the Nepalese and American outreach patients showed that all were satisfied with the outcome of surgery and reported improvement in pain and the ability to perform individual as well as everyday activities. The postoperative questionnaires completed by the elective American patients showed satisfaction with the surgery, however, they reported less improvement in all functional categories. Conclusion. We found that, despite socioeconomic status, the reasons for undergoing total joint arthroplasty were similar among all groups. Pain relief was the most important reason for having surgery. There was a tendency for elective patients to rank participation in athletic activities higher than those in the lower socioeconomic groups. All patients were satisfied with their outcomes. However, the degree of subjective improvement among elective patients was less than that in lower socioeconomic groups. This may be due to the fact that, due to their lack of access to care, patients in lower socioeconomic groups had more severe disease prior to surgery

We aimed to identify whether patients in lower socioeconomic groups had worse function prior to total knee arthroplasty and to establish whether these patients had worse post-operative outcome following total knee arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Kinemax outcome study, a prospective observational study of 974 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The study was undertaken in thirteen centres, four in the United States, six in the United Kingdom, two in Australia and one in Canada. Pre-operative data were collected within six weeks of surgery and patients were followed for two years post-operatively. Pre-operative details of the patient's demographics, socioeconomic status (education and income), height, weight and co-morbid conditions were obtained. The WOMAC and SF-36 scores were also obtained. Multivariate regression was utilised to analyse the association between socioeconomic status and the patient's pre-operative scores and post-operative outcome. During the analysis, we were able to control for variables that have previously been shown to effect pre-operative scores and post-operative outcome. Patients with a lower income had a significantly worse pre-operative WOMAC pain (p=0.021) and function score (p=0.039) than those with higher incomes. However, income did not have a significant impact on outcome except for WOMAC Pain at 12-months (p=0.014). At all the other post-operative assessment times, there was no correlation between income and WOMAC Pain and WOMAC Function. Level of education did not correlate with pre-operative scores or with outcome at any time during follow-up. This study demonstrates that across all four countries, patients with lower incomes appear to have a greater need for total knee arthroplasty. However, level of income and educational status did not appear to affect the final outcome following total knee arthroplasty. Patients with lower incomes appear able to compensate for their worse pre-operative score and obtain similar outcomes post-operatively

We aimed to identify whether patients in lower socioeconomic groups had worse function prior to total knee arthroplasty and to establish whether these patients had worse post-operative outcome following total knee arthroplasty. Data was obtained from the Kinemax outcome study, this was a prospective observational study of 974 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The study was undertaken in thirteen centers, four in the United States, six in the United Kingdom, two in Australia and one in Canada. Pre-operative data was collected within six weeks of surgery and patients were followed for two years post-operatively. Pre-operative details of the patient’s demographics, socioeconomic status (education and income), height, weight and co-morbid conditions were obtained. The WOMAC and SF-36 scores were also obtained. Multivariate regression was utilised to analyse the association between socioeconomic status and the patient’s pre-operative scores and post-operative outcome. During the analysis, we were able to control for variables that have previously been shown to effect pre-operative scores and post-operative outcome. Patients with a lower income had a significantly worse pre-operative WOMAC pain (p=0.021) and function score (p=0.039) than those with higher incomes. However, income did not have a significant impact on outcome except for WOMAC Pain at 12-months (p=0.014). At all the other post-operative assessment times, there was no correlation between income and WOMAC Pain and WOMAC Function. Level of education did not correlate with pre-operative scores or with outcome at any time during follow-up. This study demonstrates that across all four countries, patients with lower incomes appear to have a greater need for total knee arthroplasty. However, level of income and educational status did not appear to effect the final outcome following total knee arthroplasty. Patients with lower incomes appear able to compensate for their worse pre-operative score and obtain similar outcomes post-operatively

Socially deprived patients face significant barriers that reduce their access to care, presenting unique challenges for orthopaedic surgeons. Few studies have investigated the outcomes of surgical fracture care among those socially deprived, despite the increased incidence of fractures, and the inequality of care received in this group. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether social deprivation impacted the complications and subsequent management of marginalized/homeless patients following ankle fracture surgery. In this retrospective, population-based cohort study involving 202 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, we evaluated 45,444 patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for an ankle fracture performed by 710 different surgeons between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2011. Socioeconomic deprivation was measured for each patient according to their residential location by using the “deprivation” component of the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-MARG). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between deprivation and shorter-term outcomes within 1 year (implant removal, repeat ORIF, irrigation and debridement due to infection, and amputation). Multivariable cox proportional hazards (CPH) models were used to assess longer-term outcomes up to 20 years (ankle fusion and ankle arthroplasty). A higher level of deprivation was associated with an increased risk of I&D (quintile 5 vs. quintile 1: odds ratio (OR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25–3.67, p = 0.0054) and amputation (quintile 4 vs. quintile 1: OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.01–12.4, p = 0.0466). It was more common for less deprived patients to have their hardware removed compared to more deprived patients (quintile 5 vs. quintile 1: OR 0.822, 95% CI 0.76–0.888, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between marginalization and subsequent revision ORIF, ankle fusion, or ankle arthroplasty. Marginalized patients are at a significantly increased risk of infection and amputation following operatively treated ankle fractures. However, these complications are still extremely rare among this group. Thus, socioeconomic deprivation should not prohibit marginalized patients from receiving operative management for unstable ankle fractures

Aims. It is well established that there is a strong association between Perthes’ disease and worsening socioeconomic deprivation. It has been suggested that the primary determinant driving this association is exposure to tobacco smoke. This study aimed to examine this hypothesis. Patients and Methods. A hospital case-control study (n = 149/146) examined the association between tobacco smoke exposure and Perthes’ disease, adjusting for area-level socioeconomic deprivation. Tobacco smoke exposure was assessed by parental questionnaire of smoking habits during pregnancy, and by quantitative assay of current exposure using the urinary cotinine-creatinine ratio, which is a widely used and validated measure of tobacco smoke exposure. Results. The odds of Perthes’ disease significantly increased with reported in utero exposure after adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation (maternal smoking odds ratio (OR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 3.63; paternal smoking OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.46). The cotinine-creatinine ratio was significantly greater in cases, OR 1.63 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.43), suggesting a greater ‘dose’ of current tobacco exposure. Conclusion. An association exists between tobacco smoke exposure and Perthes’ disease but we remain unable to disentangle the association with socioeconomic deprivation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1102–8

Aims. Social determinants of health (SDOHs) may contribute to the total cost of care (TCOC) for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between demographic data, health status, and SDOHs on 30-day length of stay (LOS) and TCOC after this procedure. Methods. Patients who underwent TKA between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were identified. A total of 234 patients with complete SDOH data were included. Data were drawn from the Chesapeake Regional Information System, the Centers for Disease Control social vulnerability index (SVI), the US Department of Agriculture, and institutional electronic medical records. The SVI identifies areas vulnerable to catastrophic events with four themed scores: socioeconomic status; household composition and disability; minority status and language; and housing and transportation. Food deserts were defined as neighbourhoods located one or ten miles from a grocery store in urban and rural areas, respectively. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine associations with LOS and costs after controlling for various demographic parameters. Results. Divorced status was significantly associated with an increased LOS (p = 0.043). Comorbidities significantly associated with an increased LOS included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma and congestive heart failure (p = 0.043 and p = 0.001, respectively). Communities with a higher density of tobacco stores were significantly associated with an increased LOS (p = 0.017). Comorbidities significantly associated with an increased TCOC included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.004), dementia (p = 0.048), and heart failure (p = 0.007). Increased TCOCs were significantly associated with patients who lived in food deserts (p = 0.001) and in areas with an increased density of tobacco stores (p = 0.023). Conclusion. Divorced marital status was significantly associated with an increased LOS following TKA. Living in food deserts and in communities with more tobacco stores were significant risk factors for increased LOS and TCOC. Food access and ease of acquiring tobacco may both prove to be prognostic of outcome after TKA and an opportunity for intervention. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):113–118

Introduction. Alternative payment models, such as bundled payments, aim to control rising costs for total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Without risk adjustment for patients who may utilize more resources, concerns exist about patient selection and access to care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether lower socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with increased resource utilization following TKA and THA. Methods. Using the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) database, we reviewed a consecutive series of 4,168 primary TKA and THA patients over a 3-year period. We defined lowest SES based upon the median household income of the patient's ZIP code. An a prioripower analysis was performed to determine the appropriate sample size. Demographics, medical comorbidities, length of stay, discharge destination, and readmission rates were compared between patients of lowest SES and higher SES. Results. Patients in the lowest SES group had a longer hospital length of stay (2.79 vs. 2.22 days, p<0.001), were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility (27% vs. 18%, p<0.001), and be readmitted to the hospital within 90 days (11% vs. 8%, p=0.002) than the higher SES group. In the multivariate analysis, lowest SES was found to be an independent risk factor for 90-day readmission rate (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15–1.96, p=0.003), extended hospital LOS 4 days or greater (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.78–3.07, p<0.001), and discharge to a rehabilitation facility (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.34–2.01, p<0.001). Both age greater than 75 years and obesity were also independent risk factors for all three outcome measures. Conclusion. Patients in the lowest SES group utilize more resources in the 90-day postoperative period. Therefore, risk adjustment models, including SES, may be necessary to fairly compensate hospitals and surgeons and to avoid potential problems with access to joint replacement care

Aims

The overall aim of this study was to determine the impact of deprivation with regard to quality of life, demographics, joint-specific function, attendances for unscheduled care, opioid and antidepressant use, having surgery elsewhere, and waiting times for surgery on patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Introduction

The goal of the current study was to determine if SES affects PROMs in patients treated with THA. Specifically, we sought to determine any potential differences between low and high SES patients in pre-surgical PROMs, post-surgical PROMs, and PROM improvement after surgery while controlling for any potential confounding demographic factors.

We assessed the effect of social deprivation upon the Oxford knee score (OKS), the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and patient satisfaction after total knee replacement (TKR). An analysis of 966 patients undergoing primary TKR for symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) was performed. Social deprivation was assessed using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. Those patients that were most deprived underwent surgery at an earlier age (p = 0.018), were more likely to be female (p = 0.046), to endure more comorbidities (p = 0.04) and to suffer worse pain and function according to the OKS (p < 0.001). In addition, deprivation was also associated with poor mental health (p = 0.002), which was assessed using the mental component (MCS) of the SF-12 score. Multivariable analysis was used to identify independent predictors of outcome at one year. Pre-operative OKS, SF-12 MCS, back pain, and four or more comorbidities were independent predictors of improvement in the OKS (all p < 0.001). Pre-operative OKS and improvement in the OKS were independent predictors of dissatisfaction (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Although improvement in the OKS and dissatisfaction after TKR were not significantly associated with social deprivation per se, factors more prevalent within the most deprived groups significantly diminished their improvement in OKS and increased their rate of dissatisfaction following TKR.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:52–8.

Introduction

This study investigates the epidemiology of proximal radial fractures and potential links to social deprivation.

Aims. Socioeconomic and racial disparities have been recognized as impacting the care of patients with cancer, however there are a lack of data examining the impact of these disparities on patients with bone sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to examine socioeconomic and racial disparities that impact the oncological outcomes of patients with bone sarcoma. Methods. We reviewed 4,739 patients diagnosed with primary bone sarcomas from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 2007 and 2015. We examined the impact of race and insurance status associated with the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis, treatment outcome, and overall survival (OS). Results. Patients with Medicaid (odds ratio (OR) 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15 to 1.72) and uninsured patients (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.86) had higher risks of metastatic disease at diagnosis compared to patients with health insurance. Compared to White patients, Black (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.85) and Asian/Pacific Islander (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.91) were less likely to undergo surgery. In addition, Black patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.91) compared to White patients. In patients with chondrosarcoma, those with Medicaid had worse OS compared to patients with insurance (hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.56). Conclusion. In patients with a bone sarcoma, the cancer stage at diagnosis varied based on insurance status, and racial disparities were identified in treatment. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors which can mitigate socioeconomic and racial disparities found in patients with bone sarcomas. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(5):278–291