Individuals with multi-compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) frequently experience challenges in activities of daily living (ADL) such as stair ambulation. The Levitation “Tri-Compartment Offloader” (TCO) knee brace was designed to reduce pain in individuals with multicompartment KOA. This brace uses novel spring technology to reduce tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces via reduced quadriceps forces. Information on brace utility during stair ambulation is limited. This study evaluated the effect of the TCO during stair descent in patients with multicompartment KOA by assessing knee flexion moments (KFM), quadriceps activity and pain. Nine participants (6 male, age 61.4±8.1 yrs; BMI 30.4±4.0 kg/m2) were tested following informed consent. Participants had medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades two to four) diagnosed by an orthopaedic surgeon. Joint kinetics and muscle activity were evaluated during stair descent to compare three bracing conditions: 1) without brace (OFF); 2) brace in low power (LOW); and 3) brace in high power (HIGH). The brace spring engages from 60° to 120° and 15° to 120° knee flexion in LOW and HIGH, respectively. Individual brace size and fit were adjusted by a trained researcher. Participants performed three trials of step-over-step stair descent for each bracing condition. Three-dimensional kinematics were acquired using an 8-camera motion capture system. Forty-one spherical reflective markers were attached to the skin (on each leg and pelvis segment) and 8 markers on the brace. Ground reaction forces and surface EMG from the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) were collected for the braced leg. Participants rated knee pain intensity performing the task following each bracing condition on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale ranging from “no pain” (0) to “worst imaginable pain” (100). Resultant brace and knee flexion angles and KFM were analysed during stair contact for the braced leg. The brace moment was determined using brace torque-angle curves and was subtracted from the calculated KFM. Resultant moments were normalized to bodyweight and height. Peak KFMs were calculated for the loading response (Peak1) and push-off (Peak2) phases of support. EMG signals were normalized and analysed during stair contact using wavelet analysis. Signal intensities were summed across wavelets and time to determine muscle power. Results were averaged across all 3 trials for each participant. Paired T-tests were used to determine differences between bracing conditions with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (α=0.025). Peak KFM was significantly lower compared to OFF with the brace worn in HIGH during the push-off phase (p Table 1: Average peak knee flexion moments, quadriceps muscle power and knee pain during stair descent in 3 brace conditions (n=9). Quadriceps activity, knee flexion moments and pain were significantly reduced with TCO brace wear during stair descent in KOA patients. These findings suggest that the TCO assists the quadriceps to reduce KFM and knee pain during stair descent. This is the first biomechanical evidence to support use of the TCO to reduce pain during an ADL that produces especially high knee forces and flexion moments. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The anatomic resection approach is based on the patient's unique anatomy adjusting for worn cartilage or bone loss. The femoral component is aligned around the primary transverse distal femoral axis around which the tibia follows a multi-radius of curvature. The tibia cut is made according to the patient's native anatomy adjusting for worn cartilage and bone loss, and applying an anatomic amount of tibial slope. This technique minimises the need for ligamentous releases to a large degree preserving the competence of the patient's soft tissue. Ligament and capsular releases can be used in difficult cases. Adjustments for the natural varus up to 3 degrees and slope of the tibial bone cut (3 – 10 degrees) further aids in knee balancing. The final alignment may not agree with a neutral hip-knee-ankle mechanical alignment on full length standing x-rays, leaving varus knees in slight varus, and valgus legs in neutral. Since little or no balance is required, this operation can be performed efficiently. Personalise the reconstruction and alignment as much as possible for each patient. The traditional “one size fits all” method where all patients have a center hip, knee, and ankle alignment needs to be reevaluated and reserved for the valgus leg

Background. Many Accident and Emergency units employ a “one size fits all” policy with regard to referring patients with musculoskeletal injury for further review in fracture clinic. This may result in inappropriate timings of review in the clinic wasting patient time, clinic time and hospital resources. Aim. Our firm employs a rapid review of all radiographs and A&E notes of all musculoskeletal injury patients referred to our fracture clinic on a weekly basis. We aimed to investigate the impact this review has on the running of our clinic and what benefits were gained. Patients and Methods. Over a three month period all the rapid trauma review meetings were audited with respect to time taken; number of referrals; outcome of referral and staff members present. During this time an audit of the number of patients reviewed in fracture clinic by the Consultant orthopaedic surgeon was also undertaken to allow the average time taken for review of a patient in the clinic to be established. Results and Discussion. Over the three month period 117 patients were reviewed with 44(38%) being given a later appointment; 6(5%) being given an earlier appointment; 8(7%) being discharged to general practice or physiotherapy and 4(3%) being referred to a different clinic. Man time taken to review was 2.4minutes per patient. Mean time for review in fracture clinic was 12.6minutes. Taking the changes to later appointment, discharges and changes to different clinic to be inappropriate referrals, 4.7 occurred per review meeting. This equated to a mean time saved per fracture clinic of 60.6 minutes. Conclusion. This data supports the use of a rapid trauma review meeting to ensure appropriate timing of review of musculoskeletal injury patients. It saves time wasted on inappropriate reviews, saves patient dissatisfaction with being seen unnecessarily and allows patients who should be reviewed more promptly to be identified and reviewed appropriately

Introduction. Many uncemented femoral implant designs have had successful outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different uncemented stem designs achieve initial and long term stability through shape, size, coating and fit. There is increasing emphasis on bone preservation, particularly in younger and more active patients. The desire to optimize load transfer has led to the development of short stems that seek to achieve fixation in the proximal femur. Short stems designed to achieve stability by engaging the metaphysis or the proximal femoral necks are currently in clinical use. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which five stems designed to achieve proximal fixation contact the bone in the proximal femur. Using three-dimensional CT models of 30 femurs, we assessed the fit, fill and contact of each of the five different implants. Methods. Using three-dimensional computerized templating software designed to navigate robotic surgery, pre-operative CT scans of 30 patients were analyzed. Each of five femoral implant designs (TRILOCK, ARC, ABGII, CITATION, ACCOLADE) was then optimized for size and fit based on manufacturer technique guide and design rationale. The proximal femoral metaphysis was divided into four zones in the axial plane. Five contact points were determined on the frontal plane using anatomical landmarks. Each zone was assessed for cortical contact and fill of the bone-implant interface. We graded contact from 1 to 5, with 5 being 100% contact. Results. In the 150 different templates analyzed significant variability existed in contact areas of the proximal femur depending on implant design and femoral morphology. High femoral neck resection design (ARC) had the greatest contact area in the most proximal zones (Figure 1). The ABG II and Trilock stems had comparable contact in the antero-medial zones, while the ABG II had greater fill in the sagittal plane (Figures 2 & 3). The Trilock was the only stem that consistently achieved lateral cortical contact at the distal landmarks. All stems showed a pattern of mostly posteromedial contact proximally and mostly anteromedial distally. Discussion. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the contact points of metaphyseal engaging stems in the proximal femur. By directly comparing implant contact points in the same femur we found significant variability in the extent of fit, fill and contact of the metaphysis. These differences in proximal femoral contact are like to have implications for fixation in bone of varying quality and for long term proximal bone remodeling