End-stage osteoarthritis is characterised by pain and reduced physical function, for which total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recognised to be a highly effective treatment. Most implants are multi radius in design, though modern kinematic theory suggests a single flexion/extension axis is located in the femur. A recently launched TKA implant (Triathlon, Stryker US), is based on this theory, adopting a single radius of curvature femoral component. It is hypothesised that this design allows better function, and specifically, that it results in enhanced efficiency of the quadriceps group through a longer patello-femoral moment arm. Change in power output was compared between single and multi radius implants as part of a larger ongoing randomised controlled trial to benchmark the new implant. Power output was assessed using a Leg Extensor Power Rig, well validated for use with this population, pre-operatively and at 6, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively in 101 Triathlon and 82 Kinemax implants. All patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis, and drawn from a single centre. Output was reported as maximal wattage (W) generated in a single leg extension, and expressed as a proportion of the contralateral limb power output to act as an internal control. The results are shown in the table below. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of TKA on the quadriceps power output, F = 249.09, p = <0.001 and also a significant interaction of the implant group on the output F = 11.33, p = 0.001. Independent samples t-tests of between group differences at the four assessment periods highlighted greater improvement in the single radius TKA group at all post-operative assessments (p <0.03), see table. The theoretical enhanced quadriceps efficiency conferred by single radius design was found in this study. Power output was significantly greater at all post-operative assessments in the single radius compared to the multi radius group. This difference was particularly relevant at early 6 week and 1 year assessment. Lower limb power output is known to link positively to functional ability. The results support the hypothesis that TKAs with a single radius design have enhanced recovery and better function

Introduction. Femoral periprosthetic fractures above TKA are commonly treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing (IMN). This study determined if TKA design and liner type affect the minimum knee flexion required for retrograde nailing through a TKA. Methods. Twelve cadaveric specimens were prepared for six single radius (SR) TKAs and six asymmetric medial pivot (MP) TKAs. Trials with 9mm polyethylene liners were tested with cruciate retaining (CR), cruciate substituting (CS) and posterior stabilizing (PS) types. The knee was extended to identify the minimum knee flexion required to allow safe passage of the opening reamer while maintaining an optimal fluoroscopic starting point for retrograde nailing. Furthermore, the angle of axis deviation between the reamer and the femoral shaft was calculated from fluoroscopic images. Results. In all specimens, the reamer entry point was posterior to Blumensaat's line. In the SR TKA, the average flexion required was 70, 71 and 82 degrees for CR, CS and PS respectively. The required flexion in PS was significantly greater than the other designs (p=0.03). In the MP TKA, the average flexion required was 74, 84 and 123 degrees for CR, CS and PS respectively. The required flexion was significantly greater in CS and PS designs (p<0.0001). Femoral component size did not affect the minimum flexion required. Furthermore, the entry reamer required 9.2 (SR) and 12.5 (MP) degrees of posterior axis deviation from the femur. Conclusions. Our study illustrates four novel factors to consider when performing retrograde nailing through TKA. First, significant knee flexion is required to obtain an ideal radiographic starting point when retaining the liner. Second, PS implants require more flexion with both TKA designs. Third, femoral component size does not affect the flexion required. Fourth, there is a consistent posterior axis deviation of the entry reamer from the femoral shaft, explaining the commonly created extension deformity

Background. A new knee simulator has been developed at Ghent University. This simulator provides the unique opportunity of evaluating the knee kinematics during activities of daily living. The simulator therefore controls the position of the ankle in the sagittal plane while keeping the hip at a fixed position. This approach provides full kinematic freedom to the knee. To evaluate and validate the performance of the simulator, the development of and comparison with a numerical simulation model is discussed in this paper. Methods. Both a two and three dimensional simulation model have been developed using the AnyBody Modelling System (AMS). In the two dimensional model, the knee joint is represented by a hinge. Similarly, the ankle and hip joint are represented by a hinge joint and a variable amplitude quadriceps and hamstrings force is applied. In line with this simulation model, a hinge model was created that could be mounted in the UGent knee simulator to evaluate the performance of the simulated model. The hinge model thereby performs a cyclic motion under varying simulated muscle loads while recording the ankle reaction forces. In addition to the two dimensional model, a three dimensional model has been developed. More specifically, a model is built of a sawbone leg holding a posterior stabilised single radius total knee implant. The physical sawbone model contains simplified medial and lateral collateral ligaments. In line with the boundary conditions of the UGent knee simulator, the simulated hip contains a single rotational degree of freedom and the ankle holds four degrees of freedom (three rotations, single translation). In the simulations, the knee is modelled using the force-dependent kinematics (FDK) method built in the AMS. This leaves the knee with six degrees of freedom that are controlled by the ligament tension in combination with the applied quadriceps load and shape of the implant. The physical sawbone model goes through five cycles in the UGent simulator using while recording the kinematics of the femur and tibia using a set of markers rigidly attached to the femur and tibia bone. The position of the implant with respect to the markers was evaluated by CT-scanning the sawbone model. Results and Discussion. In a first step, the reaction forces at the ankle in the 2D model were evaluated. The difference between the simulated and measured reaction force is limited and can be explained from a slight variation of the attachment point of the simulated muscle loads. For the 3D model, the kinematic patterns have been evaluated for both the simulation and physical model using Grood & Suntay definitions. The kinematic parameters display realistic trends, however, no exact match has been obtained for all parameters so far. The latter might be attributed to a number of simplifications in the simulation model as well as elastic deformation of the physical sawbone model. Conclusion. A three dimensional model of a knee implant in the UGent Knee Simulator has been developed. The simulated kinematic patterns appear realistic though no exact match with the measured patterns has been obtained. Future research will therefore focus on the development of a more realistic experimental and numerical model