Shoulder impingement is one of the most common non-traumatic upper limb causes of disability in adults. Often resulting in pain and disability, management remains highly debated. This meta-analysis of randomized trials aims to evaluate the efficacy of surgical intervention in the setting of shoulder impingement in comparison to non-operative or sham treatments. Two reviewers independently screened MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED and Cochrane databases for randomized control trials published from 1946 through to May 19th, 2018. A risk of bias assessment was conducted for all included studies and outcomes were pooled using a random effects model. The primary outcome was improvement in pain up to two years. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome scores reported at the short term (/=2 years). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2statistic. Functional outcome scores were presented along with minimal clinically important differences to provide clinical context to findings. Twelve RCT's (n=1062 patients) were included in this review. Eligible patients were a mean age of 48 (SD +/− 4) years with 45% being male gender. The pooled treatment effect of surgical intervention for shoulder impingement did not demonstrate any benefit to surgery with respect to pain relief (mean difference [MD] −0.07, 95% CI −0.40 to 0.26) or short-term functional outcomes (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.27 to 0.08). Surgical intervention did result in a small statistically significant but clinically unimportant improvement in long term functional outcomes (SMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.41). Evidence suggests surgical intervention has little, if any, benefit for impingement pathology in the middle-aged patient

Os acromiale is a developmental defect caused by failure of fusion of the anterior epiphysis of the acromion between the ages of 22 and 25. The prevalence of os acromiale in the general population ranges from 1.4% to 15%. Os acromiale has been reported as a contributory factor to shoulder impingement symptoms and rotator cuff injuries, despite being a common incidental observation. In this retrospective study, we examined the prevalence of os acromiale in black African patients with shoulder pain. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 119 patients who presented with atraumatic and minor traumatic shoulder pain at a single institution over a one-year period. Anteroposterior, scapula Y-view, and axillary view plain images were initially evaluated for the presence of os acromiale, and this was corroborated with axial MRI image findings. Patients with verified os acromiale had their medical records reviewed to determine their first complaint and the results of their clinical examination and imaging examination. Radiographs and MRI on 24 patients (20%) revealed an osacromiale. This cohort had a mean age of 59.2 years, and there were significantly more females (65%) than males. Meso-acromion was identified as the most prevalent type (n=11), followed by pre-os acromion (n=7). All patients underwent bilateral shoulder x-rays, and 45 percent of patients were found to have bilateral meso- acromion. Most patients (70%) were reported to have unstable os acromiale with subacromial impingement symptoms, and nine patients (36%) had confirmed rotator cuff tears based on clinical and Mri findings. Surgery was necessary for 47% of the 24 patients with confirmed Os acromiale (arthroscopic surgery, n=7; open surgery, n=1) in order to treat their symptoms. The prevalence of os acromiale in our African patients with atraumatic shoulder symptoms is greater than that reported in the general population. Os acromiale is a rare condition that should always be considered when evaluating shoulder pain patients

Background. Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common debilitating condition, treated across multiple health disciplines including Orthopaedics, Physiotherapy, and Rheumatology. There is little consistency in diagnostic criteria with ‘Shoulder impingement syndrome’ being used for a broad spectrum of complex pathologies. We assessed patterns in diagnostic procedures for SIS across multiple disciplines. Methods. This is a systematic review of electronic databases MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL five years of publications, January 2009 - January 2014. Search terms for SIS included subacromial impingement syndrome, subacromial bursitis. Searches were delimited to articles written in English. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, data was then extracted by one reviewer and twenty percent of the extraction was independently assessed by the co-reviewer. Studies included were intervention studies examining individuals diagnosed with SIS and we were interested in the process and method used for the diagnosis. Results. The search strategy yielded 3339 articles of which 1931 were duplicates. A further 1260 were excluded based on relevance obtained from title/abstract. A total of 148 articles were identified investigating SIS across thirty different journals internationally. Fourteen different health disciplines have investigated twenty-five different surgical and conservative treatments. Studies document their diagnostic approach, reporting on duration of symptoms, medical history, physical examination tests and radiological investigations. Duration of symptoms for inclusion ranged from a minimum of 2 weeks to 18 months where the median duration of symptoms is 3 months observed in 46 percent of the studies. Commonly used physical tests were Neer's test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, Jobe and Yocum, and a further eight tests identified. Neer's test or Hawkins-Kennedy tests were individually used in 72 percent of studies. Thirty of the studies used more than one and up to six physical tests per study to determine the presence of impingement. Radiological investigations were reported in twenty-eight studies, sixteen of these required more than one radiological investigation to confirm the diagnosis of SIS. Comparisons between disciplines identify important differences in diagnostic criteria used by different health professionals. Conclusions. This study highlights the variety of diagnostic methods which are currently used between health disciplines and will be a useful comparative tool for clinicians. Diagnostic transparency is pertinent for shoulder impingement syndrome to ensure all disciplines are treating the same pathology and importantly to contribute to our understanding of the common pathology

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is increasingly used in the United States since approval by the FDA in 2003. RTSA relieves pain and restores mobility in arthritic rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Though many advantages of RTSA have been demonstrated, there still are a variety of complications (implant loosening, shoulder impingement, infection, frozen shoulder) making apparent much still is to be learned how RTSA modifies normal shoulder function. The goal of this study was to assess how RTSA affects deltoid muscle moment generating capacity post-surgery using a subject-specific computational model driven by in vivo kinematic data. A subject-specific 12 degree-of-freedom (DOF) musculoskeletal model was used to analyze the shoulders of 27 subjects (14-RTSA, 12-Normal). The model was modified from the work of Holzbaur et al. to directly input 6 DOF humerus and scapula kinematics obtained using fluoroscopy. Model geometry was scaled according to each subject's skeletal dimensions. In vivo abduction kinematics for each subject were input to their subject-specific model and muscle moment arms for the anterior, lateral and posterior aspects of the deltoid were measured over the arc of motion. Similar patterns of muscle moment arm changes were observed for normal and RTSA shoulders. The moment arm of the anterior deltoid was positive with the arm at the side and decreased monotonically, crossing zero (the point at which the muscle fibers pass across the joint center) between 50°–60° glenohumeral abduction (Figure 1a). The average moment arm of the lateral deltoid was constant and positive in normal shoulders, but showed a decreasing trend with abduction in RTSA shoulders (Figure 1b). The posterior deltoid moment arm was negative with the arm at the side, and increased monotonically to a positive value with increasing glenohumeral abduction (Figure 1c). Subject-specific moment arm values for RTSA shoulders were highly variable compared to normal shoulders. 2-way repeated measures ANOVA showed significant differences between RTSA and normal shoulders for all three aspects of the deltoid moment arm, where the moment arms in RTSA shoulders were smaller in magnitude. Shoulder functional capacity is a product of the moment generating ability of the shoulder muscles which, in turn, are a function of the muscle moment arms and muscle forces. Placement of implant components during RTSA can directly affect the geometric relationship between the humerus and scapula and, therefore, the muscle moment arms in the RTSA shoulder. Our results show RTSA shoulders maintain the same muscle moment arm patterns as healthy shoulders, but they show much greater inter-subject variation and smaller moment arm magnitudes. These observations show directly how RTSA configuration and implant placement affect deltoid moment arms, and provide an objective basis for determining optimal implant configuration and surgical placement to maximize RTSA function in a patient-specific manner